Ab-Shukor, N. A., Kay, Q. O. N., Stevens, D. P. & Skibinski, D. O. F. (1988). Salt tolerance in natural populations of Trifolium repens. New Phytologist, 109, 483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, R. J. & Brochmann, C. (2003). History and evolution of the arctic flora: in the footsteps of Eric Hultén. Molecular Ecology, 12, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Abbott, R. J. & Forbes, D. G. (2002). Extinction of the Edinburgh lineage of the allopolyploid neospecies, Senecio cambrensis Rosser (Asteraceae). Heredity, 88, 267–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, R. J., Ingram, R. & Noltie, H. J. (1983a). Discovery of Senecio cambrensis Rosser in Edinburgh. Watsonia, 14, 407–8.Google Scholar

Abbott, R. J., Noltie, H. J. & Ingram, R. (1983b). The origin and distribution of Senecio cambrensis Rosser in Edinburgh. Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 44, 103–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, R. J., Ireland, H. E. & Rogers, H. J. (2007). Population decline despite high genetic diversity in the new allopolyploid species Senecio cambrensis (Asteraceae). Molecular Ecology, 16, 1023–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, R. J.et al. (2010). Homoploid hybrid speciation in action. Taxon, 59, 1375–86.Google Scholar

Abbott, R. J.et al. (2012). Hybridization and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 229–46.Google Scholar

Abramovitz, J. N. (1996). Imperiled waters, impoverished future: the decline of freshwater ecosystems. Washington DC: Worldwatch.Google Scholar

Adams, J. U. (2008). Transcriptome: connecting the genome to gene function. Nature Education, 1, 195.Google Scholar

Adams, W. M. (2004). Against extinction: the story of conservation. London & Sterling, VA: Earthspan.Google Scholar

Agnarsson, I. & Kuntner, M. (2007). Taxonomy in a changing world: seeking solutions for a science in crisis. Systematic Biology, 56, 531–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agrawal, A. A., Laforsch, C. & Tollrian, R. (1999). Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature, 401, 60–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ågren, J. & Schemske, D. W. (2012). Reciprocal transplants demonstrate strong adaptive differentiation of the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana in its native range. New Phytologist, 194, 1112–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aguilar, R.et al. (2006). Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecological Letters, 9, 968–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ahmed, S.et al. (2009). Wind-borne insects mediate directional pollen transfer between desert fig trees 160 kilometers apart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 20342–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ainouche, M. L.et al. (2009). Hybridization, polyploidy and invasion: lessons from Spartina (Poaceae). Biological Invasions, 11, 1159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akçakaya, H. R. (2002). RAMAS Metapop: Viability Analysis for Stage-structured Metapopulations (version 4.0). Setauket, NY: Applied Biomathematics.Google Scholar

Akeroyd, J. R. (1994). Some problems with introduced plants in the wild. In The common ground of wild and cultivated plants, ed. Perry, A. R. & Ellis, R. G., pp. 31–40. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales.Google Scholar

Akeroyd, J. R. & Wyse Jackson, P. (1995). A handbook for botanic gardens on the reintroduction of plants to the wild. London: Botanic Gardens Conservation International.Google Scholar

Al-Hiyaly, S. E. K., McNeilly, T. & Bradshaw, A. D. (1988). The effect of zinc contamination from electricity pylons – evolution in a replicated situation. New Phytologist, 110, 571–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Hiyaly, S. E. K., McNeilly, T. & Bradshaw, A. D. (1990). The effect of zinc contamination from electricity pylons – contrasting patterns of evolution in five grass species. New Phytologist, 114, 183–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Hiyaly, S. E. K., McNeilly, T., Bradshaw, A. D. & Mortimer, A. M. (1993). The effect of zinc contamination from electricity pylons. Genetic constraints on selection for zinc tolerance. Heredity, 70, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Al-Kaff, N.et al. (2008). Detailed dissection of the chromosomal region containing the Ph1 Locus in Wheat Triticum aestivum: with deletion mutants and expression profiling. Annals of Botany, 101, 863–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albert, V. A., Williams, S. E. & Chase, M. W. (1992). Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science, 257, 1491–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albert, V. A., Oppenheimer, D. & Lindqvist, C. (2002). Pleiotropy, redundancy and the evolution of flowers. Trends in Plant Science, 7, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alberto, F. J.et al. (2013a). Imprints of natural selection along environmental gradients in phenology-related genes of Quercus petraea. Genetics, 195, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alberto, F. J.et al. (2013b). Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change – evidence from tree populations. Global Climate Change, 19, 1645–61.Google ScholarPubMed

Alcázar, R.et al. (2012). Signals of speciation within Arabidopsis thaliana in comparison with its relatives. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 15, 205–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aldridge, S. (1996). The thread of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, D. (2011). The language of genetics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Ali, N. S. & Trivedi, C. (2010). Plant diversity and climate change – a review of Kew's science activities relevant to climate change. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar

Ali, N. S. & Trivedi, C. (2011). Botanic Gardens and climate change – an audit of scientific activities at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Biodiversity Conservation, 20, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, E. & Pannell, J. R. (2009). Rapid divergence in physiological and life-history traits between northern and southern populations of the British introduced neo-species, Senecio squalidus. Oikos, 118, 1053–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, A. M.et al. (2011). Pollen–pistil interactions and self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae: new insights from studies of Senecio squalidus (Oxford Ragwort). Annals of Botany, 108, 687–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allendorf, F. W, Luikart, G. & Aitken, S. N. (2013) Conservation and the genetics of populations, edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Allison, L. A. (2007). Fundamental molecular biology. Malden, MA, Oxford & Carlton, Australia: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Allnutt, T. R.et al. (1998). Genetic variation in Fitzroya cupressoides (Alerce), a threatened South American conifer. Molecular Ecology, 8, 975–87.Google Scholar

Ally, D., Ritland, K. & Otto, S. P (2008). Can clone size serve as a proxy for clone age? An exploration using microsatellite divergence in Populus tremuloides. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4897–911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alonso-Blanco, C., Mendez-Vigo, B. & Koornneef, M. (2005). From phenotypic to molecular polymorphisms involved in naturally occurring variation of plant development. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 49, 717–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alsos, I. G.et al. (2007). Frequent long-distance plant colonization in the changing Arctic. Science, 316, 1606–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alsos, I. G.et al. (2009). Past and future range shifts and loss of diversity in Dwarf Willow (Salix herbacea L.) inferred from genetics, fossils, and modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18, 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, R. E. & Turner, B. L. (1963a). Biochemical systematics. London & New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Alston, R. E. & Turner, B. L. (1963b). Natural hybridization among four species of Baptisia (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany, 50, 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altizer, S. M., Thrall, P. H. & Antonovics, J. (1998), Vector behaviour and transmission of anther-smut infection in Silene alba. American MidlandNaturalist, 139, 147–63.Google Scholar

Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, F. A., Asaro, F. & Michel, H. V. (1980). Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction. Science, 208, 1095–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alvarez-Valin, F. (2002). Neutral theory. In Encyclopedia of evolution, vol. 2, 815–21, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Amborella Genome Project (2013). The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science, 342, DOI:10.1126/science.1241089

Amsellen, L., Noyer, J. L, Le Bourgeois, T. & Hossaert-McKey, M. (2000). Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Molecular Ecology, 9, 443–55.Google Scholar

Amsellem, L., Chevalier, M. H. & Hossaert-McKey, M. (2001). Ploidy level of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 228, 171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amsellem, L., Noyer, J.-L. & Hossaert-McKey, M. (2001). Evidences of a switch in the reproductive biology of Rubus alceifolius (Rosaceae) towards apomixis, between its native range and its area of introduction. American Journal of Botany, 88, 2243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, D. L. & East, I. J. (2008).The latest buzz about colony collapse disorder. Science, 319, 724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, E. (1949). Introgressive hybridisation. London: Chapman & Hall; New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. (1953). Introgressive hybridization. Biological Reviews, 28, 280–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, E. & Abbe, L. B. (1933). A comparative anatomical study of a mutant Aquilegia. American Naturalist, 67, 380–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, G.et al. (2006). Reproductive biology of the dioecious Canary Islands endemic Withania aristata (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany, 93, 1295–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. T.et al. (2012). Phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution contribute to advancing flowering phenology in response to climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 279, 3843–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Andreasen, K., Manktelow, M. & Razafimandimbison, S. G. (2009). Successful DNA amplification of a more than 200-year-old herbarium specimen: recovering genetic material from the Linnaean era. Taxon, 58, 959–62.Google Scholar

Andrews, C. A. (2010). Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow do not act in isolation in natural populations. Nature Education Knowledge, 3, 5.Google Scholar

Andrus, N.et al. (2009). Phylogenetics of Darwiniothamnus (Asteraceae: Astereae) – molecular evidence for multiple origins in the endemic flora of the Galápagos Islands. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1055–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APGIII. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 105–21.

Anon. (1965). Iconographia Mendeliana. Brno: The Moravian Museum.

Anon. (1994). IUCN Red List categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Council.

Anon. (2002). Seed banks receive vital cash boost. New Scientist, 30 August.

Anon. (2014). Protect and serve. Nations must keep expanding conservation efforts to avoid a biodiversity crisis. Editorial in Nature, 616, 144.

Antonovics, J. (1968). Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. V. Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity, 23, 219–38.Google Scholar

Antonovics, J. & Bradshaw, A. D. (1970). Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity, 25, 349–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonovics, J., Bradshaw, A. D. & Turner, R. G. (1971). Heavy metal tolerance in plants. Advances in Ecological Research, 7, 1–85.Google Scholar

Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 408, 796–815.

Araújo, M. B. & Peterson, T. (2011). Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology, 93, 1527–39.Google Scholar

Arber, A. (1938). Herbals: their origin and evolution. A chapter in the history of Botany 1470–1670, edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arbogast, B. S.et al. (2002). Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 33, 707–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archibald, J. D. & Fastovsky, D. E. (2004). Dinosaur extinction. In The Dinosauria, ed. Weishampel, D. B.et al., pp. 672–684. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Armbruster, W. S. & Baldwin, B. G. (1998). Switch from specialized to generalized pollination. Nature, 394, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, H. E., Armstrong, F. & Horton, E. (1912). Herbage studies 1. Lotus corniculatus, a cyanophoric plant. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 84, 471–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnaud-Haond, S.et al. (2012). Implications of extreme life span in clonal organisms: millenary clones in meadows of the threatened seagrass Posidonia oceanica. PLOS ONE, 7, e30454, DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0030454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnold, A. C.et al. (2005). Is there a future for wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera subsp. silvestris) in the Rhine Valley?Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, A. E.et al. (2010). Interwoven branches of the plant and fungal trees of life. New Phytologist, 185, 874–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arnold, M. L. (1992). Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, M. L. (1993). Iris nelsonii (Iridaceae): origin and genetic composition of a homoploid hybrid species. American Journal of Botany, 80, 577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, M. L. & Bennett, B. D. (1993). Natural hybridization in Louisiana Irises: genetic variation and ecological determinants. In Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, ed. Harrison, R. G., pp. 115–39. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. L., Bouck, A. C. & Cornman, R. S. (2004). Verne Grant and Louisiana Irises: is there anything new under the sun?New Phytologist, 161, 143–9.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. L., Ballerini, E. S. & Brothers, A. N. (2012). Hybrid fitness, adaptation and evolutionary diversification: lessons learned from Louisiana Irises. Heredity, 108, 159–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aronne, G. & Wilcock, C. C. (1994). First evidence of myrmecochory in fleshy-fruited shrubs of the Mediterranean region. New Phytologist, 127, 781–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronson, J.et al. (1993). Restoring natural capital: science, business and practice. Washington DC, & London: Island Press.Google Scholar

Ashley, M. V. (2010). Plant parentage, pollination, and dispersal: how DNA microsatellites have altered the landscape. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29, 148–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashman, T. L.et al. (2004). Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology, 85, 2408–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashman, T. L., Kwok, A. & Husband, B. C. (2013). Revisiting the dioecy–polyploidy association: alternate pathways and research opportunities. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 140, 241–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ashton, P. A. & Abbott, R. J. (1992). Multiple origins and genetic diversity in the newly arisen allopolyploid species, Senecio cambrensis Rosser (Compositae). Heredity, 68, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, P. S. (1987). Biological considerations in in situ vs ex situ plant conservation. In Botanic gardens and the world conservation strategy, ed. Bramwell, D., Hamann, O., Heywood, V. & Synge, H., pp. 117–30. London: Academic Press for IUCN.Google Scholar

Asker, S. E. & Jerling, L. (1992). Apomixis in plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Assouad, M. W.et al., (1978). Reproductive capacities in the sexual forms of the gynodiecious species Thymus vulgaris. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 77, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assunçáo, A. G. L., Schat, H. & Aarts, M. G. M. (2003). Thlaspi caerulescens, an attractive model species to study heavy metal hyperaccumulation in plants. New Phytologist, 159, 351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aston, J. L. & Bradshaw, A. D. (1966). Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations II. Agrostis stolonifera in maritime habitats. Heredity, 21, 649–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atwell, S.et al. (2010). Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature, 465, 627–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atwood, S. S. & Sullivan, J. T. (1943). Inheritance of a cyanogenic glucoside and its hydrolysing enzyme in Trifolium repens. Journal of Heredity, 34, 311–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auffret, A. G. (2011). Can seed dispersal by human activity play a useful role for the conservation of European grasslands?Applied Vegetation Science, 14, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avers, C. J. (1989). Process and pattern in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Avise, J. C. (1994). Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ayala, F. J. (2012). Evolution. London: Quercus.Google Scholar

Ayazloo, M. & Bell, J. N. B. (1981). Studies on the tolerance to sulphur dioxide of grass populations in polluted areas. 1. Identification of tolerant populations. New Phytologist, 88, 203–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayre, D.et al. (2010). The accumulation of genetic diversity within a canopy-stored seed bank. Molecular Ecology, 19, 2640–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ayres, D. R. & Strong, D. R. (2001). Origin and genetic diversity of Spartina anglica (Poaceae) using nuclear DNA markers. American Journal of Botany, 88, 1863–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bacles, C. F. E., Lowe, A. J. & Ennos, R. A. (2006). Effective seed dispersal across a fragmented landscape. Science, 311, 628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bailey, J. P., Bímová, K. & Mandák, B. (2009). Asexual spread versus sexual reproduction and evolution in Japanese Knotweeds sets the stage for the ‘Battle of the Clones’. Biological Invasions, 11, 1189–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailleul, D.et al. (2012). Seed spillage from grain trailers on road verges during oilseed rape harvest: an experimental survey. PLOS ONE, 7, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, A. M., Barrett, S. C. H. & Thompson, J. D. (2000). Variation of pollen limitation in the early flowering Mediterranean geophyte Narcissus assoanus (Amaryllidaceae). Oecologia, 124, 529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, H. (1966). The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution, 20, 349–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baker, H. G. (1947). Criteria of hybridity. Nature, 159, 1–5.Google ScholarPubMed

Baker, H. G. (1951). Hybridization and natural gene-flow between higher plants. Biological Reviews, 26, 302–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, H. G. (1954). Report of meeting of British Ecological Society, April 1953. Journal of Ecology, 42, 570–2.Google Scholar

Baker, H. G. (1955). Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. Evolution, 9, 347–9.Google Scholar

Baker, H. G. (1965). Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In The genetics of colonizing species, ed. Baker, H. G. & Stebbins, G. L., pp. 147–72. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baker, H. G. (1967). Support for Baker's Law – as a rule. Evolution, 21, 853–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, H. G. (1974). The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, H. G. (1991). The continuing evolution of weeds. Economic Botany, 45, 445–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, H. G. & Cox, P. A. (1984). Further thoughts on dioecism and islands. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 71, 244–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, E. G.et al. (2006). A genome-wide survey of R gene polymorphisms in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell, 18, 1803–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balakrishnan, R. (2005). Species concepts, species boundaries and species identification: a view from the tropics. Systematic Biology, 54, 689–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balcombe, D. (2011). Invigorating plants. Research Horizons, 5, 9 and http://phys.org/news/2011-07-invigorating.htmlGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, B. G. (2006). Contrasting patterns and processes of evolutionary change in the tarweed-silversword lineage: revisiting Clausen, Keck, and Heisey's findings. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 93, 66–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, B. G. & Wagner, W. L. (2010). Hawaiian angiosperm radiations of North American origin. Annals of Botany, 105, 849–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balmford, A. & Long, A. (1994). Avian endemism and forest loss. Nature, 372, 623–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balmford, A. & Whitten, T. (2003). Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met?Oryx, 37, 238–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bannister, M. H. (1965). Variation in the breeding system of Pinus radiata. In The genetics of colonizing species, ed. Baker, H. G. & Stebbins, G. L., pp. 353–72. New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bannister, P. (1976). Introduction to physiological plant ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barcaccia, G. & Albertini, E. (2013). Apomixis in plant reproduction: a novel perspective on an old dilemma. Plant Reproduction, 26, 159–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barkley, T. M. (1966). A review of the origin and development of the florists’ Cineraria, Senecio cruentus. Economic Botany, 20, 386–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkman, T. J., Lim, S.-H., Mat Salleh, K. & Nais, J. (2004). Mitochondrial DNA sequences reveal the photosynthetic relatives of Rafflesia, the world's largest flower. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 787–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barkman, T. J.et al. (2007). Mitochondrial DNA suggests at least 11 origins of parasitism in angiosperms and reveals genomic chimerism in parasitic plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barling, D. M. (1955). Some population studies in Ranunculus bulbosus L. Journal of Ecology, 43, 207–18.

Barlow, B. A. & Wiens, D. (1977). Host parasite resemblance in Australian Mistletoes: the case for cryptic mimicry. Evolution, 31, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnes, D. K. A. (2002). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 364, 1985–98.Google Scholar

Barnosky, A. D.et al. (2011). Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived?Nature, 471, 51–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnosky, A. D.et al. (2012). Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere. Nature, 486, 52–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrett, P. H.et al. (1987). Charles Darwin notebooks 1836–1844. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and the British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1980a) Sexual reproduction in Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth). I. Fertility of clones from diverse regions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H (1980b). Sexual reproduction in Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth). II. Seed production in natural populations. Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1983). Crop mimicry in weeds. Economic Botany, 37, 255–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1985). Floral trimorphism and monomorphism in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng.) Sols. (Pontederiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 25, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1987). Mimicry in plants. Scientific American, 255, 76–83.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1988). Mating system evolution and speciation in heterostylous plants. In Speciation and its consequences, ed. Otte, D. & Endler, J. A., pp. 257–83. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1989a). The evolutionary breakdown of heterostyly. In The evolutionary ecology of plants, ed. Bock, J. H. & Linhart, Y. B., pp.151–69. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1989b). Mating system evolution and speciation in heterostylous plants. In Speciation and its consequences, ed. Otte, D. & Endler, J. A., pp. 257–83. Sunderland, MA: SinauerGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (1992). Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis. In Evolution and function of heterostyly, ed. Barrett, S. C. H., pp. 1–29. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. (2010a). Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Ser. B., 365, 351–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrett, S. C. H. (2010b). Understanding plant reproductive diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Ser. B., 365, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrett, S. C. H. & Charlesworth, D. (2007). David Graham Lloyd 20 June 1937–30 May 2006. Biographical Memoirs of the Fellows of the Royal Society, 53, 203–21.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. & Harder, L. D. (1996). Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 73–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrett, S. C. H. & Kohn, J. R. (1991). Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In Genetics and conservation of rare plants, ed. Falk, D. A. & Holsinger, K. E., pp. 3–30. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. & Richardson, B. J. (1986). Genetic attributes of invading species. In Ecology of biological invasions, ed. Groves, R. H. & Brown, J. J., pp. 21–33. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. & Shore, J. S. (1990). Isozyme variation in colonising plants. In Isozymes in plant biology, ed. Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S., pp. 106–26. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H. & Shore, J. S.. (2008). New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics. In Self-incompatibility in flowering plants: evolution, diversity and mechanisms, ed. Franklin-Tong, V., pp. 3–32. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H., Dorken, M. E. and Case, A. L. (2001). A geographical context for the evolution of plant reproductive systems. In Integrating ecological and evolutionary processes in a spatial context, ed. Silvertown, J. & Antonovics, J., pp. 341–64. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H., Colautti, R. I. & Eckert, C. G. (2008). Reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology, 17: 373–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barrett, S. C. H., Ness, R. W. & Vallejo-Marín, M. (2009). Evolutionary pathways to self-fertilization in a tristylous plant species. New Phytologist, 183, 546–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, S. C. H.et al. (2011). Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Molecular Biology, 17, 373–83.Google Scholar

Barringer, B. C. (2007). Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany, 94, 1527–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barros, M. D. C. & Dyer, T. A. (1988). Atrazine resistance in the grass Poa annua is due to a single base change in a chloroplast gene for the D1 protein of photosystem II. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 75, 610–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, N. H. (2000). Genetic hitchhiking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 355, 1553–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barton, N. H. & Charlesworth, B. (1984). Genetic revolutions, founder effects, and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 133–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bashford, A. & Levine, P. (2012). The Oxford handbook of the history of eugenics. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateman, R. M. (1999). Integrating molecular and morphological evidence of evolutionary radiations. In Molecular systematics and plant evolution, ed. Hollingsworth, P. M., Bateman, R. M. & Gornall, R. J., pp. 432–71. London & New York: Taylor & Francis. Systematics Association Special Volume Series 57.Google Scholar

Bateman, R. M. (2011). The perils of addressing long-term challenges in a short-term world: making descriptive taxonomy predictive. In Climate change, ecology and systematics, ed. Hodkinson, T. R.. et al., pp.67–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bateman, R. M. & DiMichele, W. A. (2002). Generating and filtering major phenotypic novelties: neoGoldschmidtian saltation revisited. In Developmental genetics and plant evolution, ed. Cronk, Q. C. B., Bateman, R. M. & Hawkin, J. A., pp. 109–59. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Bateman, R. M. & Sexton, R. (2008). Is spur length of Platanthera species in the British Isles adaptively optimized or an evolutionary red herring?Watsonia, 27, 1–21.Google Scholar

Bateman, R. M., Pridgeon, A. M. & Chase, M. W. (1997). Phylogenetics of subtribe Orchidineae (Orchidoideae, Orchidaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. 2. Infrageneric relationships and reclassification to achieve monophyly of Orchis sensu stricto. Lindleyana, 12, 113–41.Google Scholar

Bateson, W. (1895a). The origin of the cultivated Cineraria. Nature, 51, 605–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, W. (1895b). The origin of the cultivated Cineraria. Nature, 52, 29, 103–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, W. (1897). Notes on hybrid Cinerarias produced by Mr Lynch and Miss Pertz. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 9, 308–9.Google Scholar

Bateson, W. (1909). Mendel's principles of heredity. London: Cambridge University Press; New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, W. (1913). Problems of genetics. London: Oxford University Press; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, W. & Punnett, R. C. (1911). On gametic series involving reduplication of certain terms. Journal of Genetics, 1, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, W. & Saunders, E. R. (1902). Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Report to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, 1, 1–160.Google Scholar

Bateson, W., Saunders, E. R. & Punnett, R. C. (1905). Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Report to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society, 2, 1–55, 80–99.Google Scholar

Battaglia, E. (1963). Apomixis. In Recent advances in the embryology of Angiosperms, ed. Maheshwari, P., ch. 8, pp. 221–64. Delhi: University of Delhi Press.Google Scholar

Baucom, R. S. (2016). The remarkable repeated evolution of herbicide resistance. American Journal of Botany, 103, 181–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baum, D. A. & Donoghue, M. J. (2002). Transference of function, heterotopy, and the evolution of plant development. In Developmental genetics and plant evolution, ed. Cronk, Q. C. B., Bateman, R. M. & Hawkin, J. A., pp. 52–69. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Baum, D. A. & Smith, S. D. (2012). Tree-thinking: an introduction to phylogenetic biology. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts & Company.Google Scholar

Baum, D. A, Randall, L. S. & Wendel, J. F. (1998). Biogeography and floral evolution of Baobabs (Adansonia, Bombacaceae) as inferred from multiple data sets. Systematic Biology, 47, 181–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baumann, U.et al. (2000). Self-incompatibility in the grasses. Annals of Botany, 85, 203–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumel, A., Ainouche, M. L. & Levasseur, J. E. (2001). Molecular investigations in populations of Spartina anglica C.E. Hubbard (Poaceae) invading coastal Brittany (France). Molecular Ecology, 10, 1689–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bawa, K. S., Perry, D. R. & Beach, J. H. (1985). Reproductive biology of tropical lowland rain forest trees. I. Sexual systems and self-incompatibility mechanisms. American Journal of Botany, 72, 331–45.Google Scholar

Bayer, R. J., Ritland, K. & Purdy, B. G. (1990). Evidence of partial apomixis in Antennaria media (Asteraceae: Inuleae) detected by segregation of genetic markers. American Journal of Botany, 77, 1078–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsell, D. V.et al. (1993). Reproductive biology of Australian Myrtaceae. Australian Journal of Botany, 41, 511–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beattie, A. (1978). Plant–animal interactions affecting gene flow in Viola. In The pollination of flowers by insects, ed. Richards, A. J., pp. 151–64, Linnean Society Symposium Series 6. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bebber, D. P.et al. (2010). Herbaria are a major frontier for species discovery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 22169–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beck, J. B., Schmuths, H. & Schaal, B. A. (2007). Native range genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana is strongly geographically structured and reflects Pleistocene glacial dynamics. Molecular Ecology, 17, 902–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beckage, B.et al. (2008). A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 4197–202.Google Scholar

Becker, C.et al. (2011). Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature, 480, 245–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beckman, N. G. & Rogers, H. S. (2013). Consequences of seed dispersal for plant recruitment in tropical forests: interactions within the seedscape. Biotropica, 45, 666–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becqemont, D. (2009). Charles Darwin, 1837–1839: aux sources d'une découverte. Paris: Editions Kimé.Google Scholar

Beddall, B. G. (1957). Historical notes on avian classification. Systematic Zoology, 6, 129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beddall, B. G. (1988). Darwin and divergence: the Wallace connection. Journal of the History of Biology, 21, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beddie, A. D. (1942). Natural root grafts in New Zealand trees. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 71, 199–203.Google Scholar

Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin's black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Beilstein, M. A.et al. (2010). Dated molecular phylogenies indicate a Miocene origin for Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 18724–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell, C. D., Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S. (2010). The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited. American Journal of Botany, 97, 1296–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell, G. (1982). The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Belzer, N. F. & Ownbey, M. (1971). Chromatographic comparison of Tragopogon species and hybrids. American Journal of Botany, 58, 791–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Ayed, R. I.et al. (2014). Genetic similarity among Tunisian olive cultivars and two unknown feral olive trees estimated through SSR markers. Biochemical Genetics, 52, 258–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bendiksby, M.et al. (2011). Allopolyploid origins of the Galeopsis tetraploids – revisiting Müntzing's classical textbook example using molecular tools. New Phytologist, 191, 1150–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bengtsson, B. O. (2009). Asex and evolution: a very large-scale overview. In Lost sex: the evolutionary biology of parthenogenesis, ed. Schön, I., Martens, K. & Dijk, P. van, pp. 1–19. Berlin: Springer Publications.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. H. (1983). Natural selection, heredity and eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, K. D., Bhagwat, S. A. & Willis, K. J. (2012). Neotropical refugia. The Holocene, 22, 1207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, M. D. (1995). The development and use of genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) as a new tool in plant systematics. In Kew Chromosome Conference IV, ed. Brandham, P. E. & Bennett, M. D., pp.167–83. Richmond, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. T., Kenton, A. Y. & Bennett, M. D. (1992). Genomic in situ hybridization reveals the allopolyploid nature of Milium montianum (Graminae). Chromosoma, 101, 420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, L. (1962). Plant taxonomy. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar

Bento, M.et al. (2013). Retrotransposons represent the most labile fraction for genomic rearrangements in polyploid plant species. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, DOI:10.1159/000353308CrossRef

Benton, M. J. (2000). Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead?Biological Reviews, 75, 633–48.Google ScholarPubMed

Benton, M. J., Donoghue, P. C. J. & Asher, R. J. (2009). Calibrating and constraining molecular clocks. In The timetree of life, ed. Hedges, S. B. and Kumar, S., pp. 35–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bergman, B. (1935). Zytologische Studien über sexuelles und asexuelles Hieracium umbellatum. Hereditas, 20, 47–64.Google Scholar

Bergman, B. (1941). Studies on the embryo sac mother cell and its development in Hieracium subg. Archieracium. Svensk botanisk Tidskrift, 35, 1–42.Google Scholar

Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E. & Raven, P. H. (1974). Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Berners-Lee, M. & Clark, D. (2013). The burning question: we can't burn half the world's oil, coal and gas, so how do we quit?London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Berry, P. E., Tobe, H. & Gómez, J. A. (1991). Agamospermy and the loss of distyly in Erythroxylum undulatum (Erythroxylaceae) from Northern Venezuela. American Journal of Botany, 78, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, R. J. (1977). Inheritance and natural history. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Bessey, C. E. (1908). The taxonomic aspect of the species questions. American Naturalist, 42, 218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bessey, C. E. (1915). The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals of Missouri Botanic Garden, 2, 109–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhattachayya, M.et al. (1990). The wrinkled-seed character of pea described by Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene encoding starch-branching enzyme. Cell, 60, 115–22.Google Scholar

Bhattachayya, M., Martin, C. & Smith, A. (1993). The importance of starch biosynthesis in the wrinkled seed shape character of peas studied by Mendel. Plant Molecular Biology, 22, 525–31.Google Scholar

Bicknell, R. A. & Koltunow, A. M. (2004). Understanding apomixis: recent advances and remaining conundrums. The Plant Cell, 16, S228–S245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bicknell, R. A., Lambie, S. C. & Butler, R. C. (2003). Quantification of progeny classes in two facultatively apomictic accessions of Hieracium. Hereditas, 138, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Billington, H. L. (1991). Effect of population size on genetic variability in a dioecious conifer. Conservation Biology, 5, 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Gittleman, J. L. & Steel, M. A. (2002). The (super)tree of life. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 265–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birks, H. J. B. (1986). Late-Quaternary biotic changes in terrestrial and lacustrine environments, with particular reference to north-west Europe. In Handbook of Holocene palaeoecology and palaeohydrology, ed. Berglund, E., pp. 3–65. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Birks, H. J. B. & Willis, K. J. (2008) Alpine trees and refugia in Europe. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 1, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisby, F. A.et al. (2002). Taxonomy, at the click of a mouse. Nature, 418, 367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bishop, J. A. & Cook, L. M. (1981) Genetic consequences of man made change. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bishop, J. A. & Korn, M. E. (1969). Natural selection and cyanogenesis in White Clover, Trifolium repens. Heredity, 24, 423–30.Google Scholar

Bishop, O. (1971). Statistics for biology. A practical guide for the experimental biologist, edn. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Bittencourt Júnior, N. S., Gibbs, P. E. & Semir, J. (2003). Histological study of post-pollination events in Spathodea campanulata Beauv. (Bignoniaceae), a species with late-acting self-incompatibility. Annals of Botany, 91, 827–34.Google Scholar

Bittrich, V. & Kadereit, J. (1988). Cytogenetical and geographical aspects of sterility in Lysimachia nummularia. Nordic Journal of Botany, 8, 325–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, W. H. (2002). One-hundred-year code déjà vu?Taxon, 51, 151–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, A. W. & Williamson, P. S. (2010). Pollen dispersal in Star Cactus (Astrophytum asterias). Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 525–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakeslee, A. F. & Avery, A. G. (1937). Methods of inducing chromosome doubling in plants. Journal of Heredity, 28, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaxter, M. L. (2004). The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 359, 669–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bleeker, W. & Hurka, H. (2001). Introgressive hybridization in Rorippa (Brassicaceae): gene flow and its consequences in natural and anthropogenic habitats. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2013–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bliege Bird, R.et al. (2008). The ‘fire stick farming’ hypothesis: Australian Aboriginal foraging strategies, biodiversity and anthropogenic fire mosaics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 14796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blois, J. L.et al. (2013). Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science, 341. 499–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blunt, W. (2004). Linnaeus: The Compleat Naturalist. London: Frances Lincoln.Google Scholar

Bøcher, T. W. (1949). Racial divergences in Prunella vulgaris in relation to habitat and climate. New Phytologist, 48, 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bøcher, T. W. (1963). The study of ecotypical variation in relation to experimental morphology. Regnum Vegetabile, 27, 10–16.Google Scholar

Bøcher, T. W. & Larsen, K. (1958). Geographical distribution of initiation of flowering, growth habit and other factors in Holcus lanatus. Botaniska Notiser, 3, 289–300.Google Scholar

Bøcher, T. W. & Lewis, M. C. (1962). Experimental and cytological studies on plant species. 7, Geranium sanguineum. Biologiske Skrifter, 11, 1–25.Google Scholar

Bohm, W. (1979). Methods of studying root systems. Berlin, Heidelberg & New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolkhovskikh, Z., Grif, V., Matvejeva, T. & Zakharyeva, O. (1969). Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR.Google Scholar

Bomblies, K. (2010). Doomed lovers: mechanisms of isolation and incompatibility in plant speciation. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61, 109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bomblies, K. & Weigel, D. (2010). Arabidopsis and relatives as models for the study of genetic and genomic incompatibilities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 365, 1815–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bomblies, K.et al. (2007). Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky–Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biology, 5, 1962–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bone, E. & Farres, A. (2001). Trends and rates of microevolution in plants. Genetica, 112–113, 165–82.Google ScholarPubMed

Bonin, A., Ehrich, D. & Manel, S. (2007). Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Molecular Ecology, 16, 3737–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonnier, G. (1890). Cultures expérimentales dans les Alpes et les Pyrénées. Revue générale de Botanique, 2, 513–46.Google Scholar

Bonnier, G. (1895). Recherches expérimentales sur l'adaptation des plantes au climat Alpin. Annales des Sciences naturelles (Botanique), 20, 217–360.Google Scholar

Bonnier, G. (1920). Nouvelles observations sur les cultures expérimentales à diverses altitudes et cultures par semis. Revue générale de Botanique, 32, 305–26.Google Scholar

Bordacs, S.et al. (2002). Chloroplast DNA variation of white oaks in northern Balkans and in the Carpathian Basin. Forest Ecology and Management, 156, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borg, S. J. (1972). Variability of Rhinanthus serotinus (Schönh.) Oborny in relation to environment. Unpublished thesis, Rijksuniversiteit te Groningen.

Borges, L. A., Sobrinho, M. S. & Lopes, A. V. (2009). Phenology, pollination, and breeding system of the threatened tree Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Fabaceae), and a review of studies on the reproductive biology in the genus. Flora, 204, 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgström, G. (1939). Formation of cleistogamic and chasmogamic flowers in Wild Violets as a photoperiodic response. Nature, 144, 514–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosemark, N. O. (1954). On accessory chromosomes in Festuca pratensis. I. Cytological investigations. Hereditas, 40, 346–76.Google Scholar

Bossdorf, O.et al. (2005). Phenotypic and genetic differentiation in native versus introduced plant populations. Oecologia, 144, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boswell Syme, J. T. (ed.) (1866). English botany; or Coloured figures of British plants, edn., vol. 6. London: Hardwicke.Google Scholar

Bothmer, R.et al. (1971). Clonal variation in populations of Anemone nemorosa L. Botaniska Notiser, 124, 505–19.

Bottin, L., Cadre, S. Le, Quilichini, A., Bardin, P., Moret, J.et al. (2007) Re-establishment trials in endangered plants: a review and the example of Arenaria grandiflora, a species on the brink of extinction in the Parisian region (France). Ecoscience, 14, 410–19, DOI:10.2980/1195-6860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouck, A. C.et al. (2005). Genetic mapping of species boundaries in Louisiana Irises using IRRE retrotransposon display markers. Genetics, 171, 1289–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowlby, J. (1990). Charles Darwin. A biography. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. (2008). Foreword. In Natural selection and beyond: the intellectual legacy of Alfred Russel Wallace, ed. Smith, C. H. & Beccaloni, G.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (1989a). The Mendelian revolution. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (1989b). Evolution. The history of an idea. Revised edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bowler, P. J. (1990). Charles Darwin; the man and his influence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bowles, M. L. & Whelan, C. J. (1994). Restoration of endangered species, conceptual issues, planning and implementation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Box, J. F. (1978). R. A. Fisher. The life of a scientist. New York, Chichester, Brisbane & Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar

Box, M.S.et al. (2008). Floral ontogenetic evidence of repeated speciation via paedomorphosis in subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 157, 429–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brackman, A. C. (1980). A delicate arrangement: the strange case of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar

Bradley, R. S. (1985). Quaternary paleoclimatology: methods of paleoclimatic reconstruction. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1959a). Population differentiation in Agrostis tenuis Sibth. I. Morphological differentiation. New Phytologist, 58, 208–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1959b). Population differentiation in Agrostis tenuis Sibth. II. The incidence and significance of infection by Epichloë typhina. New Phytologist, 58, 310–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1959c). Studies of variation in bent grass species. II. Variation within Agrostis tenuis. Journal of the Sports Turf Research Institute, 10, 1–7.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1960). Population differentiation in Agrostis tenuis Sibth. III. Populations in varied environments. New Phytologist, 59, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1965). Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics, 13, 115–55.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1976). Pollution and evolution. In Effects of air pollution on plants, ed. Mansfield, T. A., pp. 135–59. London, New York & Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. (1989). Is evolution fettered or free? Transactions of the Botanical Society ofEdinburgh, 45, 303–11.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. & McNeilly, T. (1981). Evolution and pollution. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A. D. & McNeilly, T. (1991). Evolutionary response to global climate change. Annals of Botany, 87 (Suppl.), 5–14.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2012). Little left to lose: deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization. Journal of Plant Ecology. 5, 109–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, M. E. (1963a). Studies on Alchemilla filicaulis Bus., sensu lato and A. minima Walters. Introduction and I. Morphological variation in A. filicaulis, sensu lato. Watsonia, 5, 304–20.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, M. E. (1963b). Studies on Alchemilla filicaulis Bus., sensu lato, and A. minima Walters. II. Cytology of A. filicaulis, sensu lato. Watsonia, 5, 321–6.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, M. E. (1964). Studies on Alchemilla filicaulis Bus., sensu lato and A. minima Walters. III. Alchemilla minima. Watsonia, 6, 76–81.Google Scholar

Brady, K. U., Kruckeberg, A. R. & Bradshaw, H. D. Jr (2005). Evolutionary ecology of plant adaptation to serpentine soils. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brand, C. J. & Waldron, L. R. (1910). Cold resistance of Alfalfa and some factors influencing it. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry. Bulletin 185, 1–80.Google Scholar

Brannigan, A. (1979). The reification of Mendel. Social Studies of Science, 9, 423–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauner, S. & Gottlieb, L. D. (1987). A self-compatible plant of Stephanomeria exigua subsp. coronaria (Asteraceae) and its relevance to the origin of its self-pollinating derivative S. malheurensis. Systematic Botany, 12, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breed, M. F.et al. (2013). Which provenance and where? Seed sourcing strategies for revegetation in a changing environment. Conservation Genetics, 14, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehm, B. G. & Ownbey, M. (1965). Variation in chromatographic patterns in the Tragopogon dubius pratensis – porrifolius complex (Compositae). American Journal of Botany, 52, 81, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breiman, A. & Graur, D. (1995). Wheat evolution. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 43, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breinholt, J. W.et al. (2009). Population structure of an endangered Utah endemic Astragalus ampullaroides (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany, 96, 661–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenchley, W. E. & Warington, K. (1969). The Park Grass plots at Rothamsted, 1856–1949. Harpenden: Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar

Brennan, A. C. (2014). The genetic structure of Arabidopsis thaliana in the south-western Mediterranean range reveals a shared history between North Africa and southern Europe. BMC Plant Biology, 14:17, DOI:10.1186/1471-2229-14-17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brennan, A. C.et al. (2011). Sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae): S allele dominance interactions and modifiers of cross-compatibility and selfing rates. Heredity, 106, 113–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brenner, G. J. (1996). Evidence for the earliest stage of angiosperm pollen evolution: a paleoequatorial section from Israel. In Flowering plant origin, evolution and phylogeny, ed. Taylor, D. W. & Hickey, L. J., pp.91–115. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Breshears, D. D.et al. (2005). Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 15144–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bretagnolle, F. & Thompson, J. D. (1995). Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution in autoployploid plants. New Phytologist, 129, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briand, F.et al. (1989). The Alps. A system under pressure. Chambéry: International Union for Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar

Brickell, C. D.et al. (2008) Do the views of users of taxonomic output count for anything?Taxon, 57, 1047–8.Google Scholar

Briggs, D. (2009). Plant microevolution and conservation in human-influenced ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, D. & Block, M. (1981). An investigation into the use of the ‘-deme’ terminology. New Phytologist, 89, 729–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Briggs, D. & Walters, S. M. (1997). Plant variation and evolution, edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Briggs, J. C. (1987). Biogeography and plate tectonics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Broadhurst, L. M.et al. (2008). Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 587–97.Google ScholarPubMed

Brochet, A. L.et al. (2009). The role of migratory ducks in the long-distance dispersal of native plants and the spread of exotic plants in Europe. Ecography, 32, 298–319.Google Scholar

Brochmann, C., Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (1992a). Recurrent formation and polyphyly of Nordic polyploids in Draba (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 79, 673–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brochmann, C., Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (1992b). Multiple origins of the octoploid Scandinavian endemic Draba cacuminum: electrophoretic and morphological evidence. Nordic Journal of Botany, 12, 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brochmann, C.et al. (1998). Molecular evidence for polyploid origins in Saxifraga (Saxifragaceae): the narrow arctic endemic S. svalbardensis and its widespread allies. American Journal of Botany, 85, 135–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brochmann, C.et al. (2000). Multiple diploid hybrid speciation of the Canary Island endemic Argyranthemum sundingii (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 220, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brochmann, C.et al. (2004). Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 82, 521–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockway, L. H. (1979). Science and colonial expansion: the role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bronstein, J. L., Alarcón, R. & Geber, M. (2006). The evolution of plant–insect mutualisms. New Phytologist, 172, 412–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brooks, J. L. (1983). Just before the Origin: Alfred Russel Wallace's theory of evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, R. R.et al. (1977). Detection of nickeliferous rocks by analysis of herbarium specimens of indicator plants. Journal of Geochemistry Exploration, 7, 49–57.Google Scholar

Brougham, R. W. & Harris, W. (1967). Rapidity and extent of changes in genotypic structure induced by grazing in a Ryegrass population. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 10, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. H. D. (1979). Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 15, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. H. D. & Burdon, J. J. (1983). Multilocus diversity in an outbreeding weed, Echium plantagineum L. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 36, 503–9.

Brown, A. H. D. & Marshall, D. R. (1981). Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants. In Evolution today, ed. Sudder, G. C. E. & Reveal, J. L., pp. 351–63. Pittsburgh, PA: Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation.Google Scholar

Brown, A. D. H. & Schoen, D. J. (1992). Plant population genetic structure and biological conservation. In Conservation of biodiversity for sustainable development, ed. Sandlund, O. T.et al., pp. 88–104. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, V. K. & Lawton, J. H. (1991). Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 333, 267–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, J. (1983). The Secular Ark; studies in the history of biogeography. New Haven, CT, & London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, J. (1995). Charles Darwin: Voyaging. Volume 1 of a biography. London: Pimlico. Random House.Google Scholar

Browne, J. (2002). Charles Darwin: The power of place. Volume 2 of a biography. London: Pimlico. Random House.Google Scholar

Brownfield, L. & Köhler, C. (2011).Unreduced gamete formation in plants: mechanisms and prospects. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 1659–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brucker, R. M. & Bordenstein, S. R. (2013).Speciation by symbiosis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 443–51.Google Scholar

Brummitt, R. K. (1996). In defence of paraphyletic taxa. In The biodiversity of African plants, ed. Maesen, L. J. G. van der, Burgt, X. M. van der & Rooy, J. M. van Medenbach de, Proceedings XIVth AETFAT Congress, 22–27 August 1994, Wageningen, pp. 371–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Brummitt, R. K. (1997). Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon, 46, 723–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brummitt, R. K. (2002). How to chop up a tree. Taxon, 51, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brummitt, R. K. (2003). Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa. Taxon, 52, 803–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brummitt, R. K. (2006). The democratic processes of plant nomenclature. In Taxonomy and plant conservation: the cornerstone of the conservation and the sustainable use of plants, ed. Leadlay, E. & Jury, S, pp. 101–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brunsfeld, S. J. & Sullivan, J. (2005). A multi-compartmented glacial refugium in the northern Rocky Mountains: evidence from the phylogeography of Cardamine constancei (Brassicaceae). Conservation Genetics, 6, 895–904.Google Scholar

Brus, R. (2010). Growing evidence for the existence of glacial refugia of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the south-eastern Alps and north-western Dinaric Alps. Periodicum Biologorum, 112, 239–46.Google Scholar

Brush, S. G. (2009). Choosing selection. The revival of natural selection in Anglo-American evolutionary biology, 1930–1970. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 99 (3), 1–183. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Brussard, P. F. (1997). A paradigm in conservation biology. Science, 277, 527–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, H. N. & Cantino, P. D. (2002). A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue?Biological Review, 77, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brysting, A. K., Mathiesen, C. & Marcussen, T. (2011). Challenges in polyploid phylogenetic reconstruction: a case story from the arctic–alpine Cerastium alpinum complex. Taxon, 60, 333–47.Google Scholar

Budiansky, S. (1995). Nature's keepers. the new science of nature management. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Buggs, R. J. A. (2007). Empirical studies of hybrid zone movement. Heredity, 99, 301–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buggs, R. J. A.et al. (2008). Does phylogenetic distance between parental genomes govern the success of polyploids?Castanea, 73, 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buggs, R. J. A., Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (2009). Does hybridization between divergent progenitors drive whole-genome duplication?Molecular Ecology, 18, 3334–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buggs, R. J. A.et al. (2009). Gene loss and silencing in Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae): comparison of natural and synthetic allotetraploids. Heredity, 103, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buggs, R. J. A.et al. (2010a). Tissue-specific silencing of homoeologs in natural populations of the recent allopolyploid Tragopogon mirus. New Phytologist, 186, 175–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buggs, R. J. A.et al. (2010b). Characterization of duplicate gene evolution in the recent natural allopolyploid Tragopogon miscellus by next-generation sequencing and Sequenom iPLEX MassARRAY genotyping. Molecular Ecology, 19, 132–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buggs, R. J. A., Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (2011). Biosystematic relationships and the formation of polyploids. Taxon, 60, 324–32.Google Scholar

Buggs, R. J. A.et al. (2011). Transcriptomic shock generates evolutionary novelty in a newly formed, natural allopolyploid plant. Current Biology, 21, 551–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buggs, R. J. A.et al. (2012). Next-generation sequencing and genome evolution in allopolyploids. American Journal of Botany, 99, 372–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bullock, J. M. (1998). Community translocation in Britain: setting objectives and measuring consequences. Biological Conservation, 6, 166–74.Google Scholar

Bulmer, M. (2003) Francis Galton: pioneer of heredity and biometry. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Bulmer, M. G. (1967). Principles of statistics, edn. London & Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar

Burchfield, J. D. (1990). Lord Kelvin and the age of the Earth. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burd, M. (1994). Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review, 60, 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burdon, J. J. (1980). Intraspecific diversity in a natural population of Trifolium repens. Journal of Ecology, 68, 717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burdon, J. J. (1987). Disease and plant population biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burdon, J. J., Marshall, D. R. & Groves, R. H. (1980). Isozyme variation in Chondrilla juncea in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany, 28, 193–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, K. S.et al. (2005). Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Molecular Ecology, 14, 3471–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burkhardt, F. & Smith, S. (1985–). The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, F. & Smith, S. (1991). The correspondence of Charles Darwin. Volume 7 1858–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burkill, I. H. (1895). On the variations in number of stamens and carpels. Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany), 31, 216–45.Google Scholar

Busch, J.et al. (2012). Climate change and the cost of conserving species in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 26, 408–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bush, E. J. & Barrett, S. C. H. (1993). Genetics of mine invasions by Deschampsia cespitosa (Poaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany – Revue Canadienne de Botanique, 71, 1336–48.Google Scholar

Bush, M. B. & de Oliveira, P. E. (2006). The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian Speciation: a paleo-ecological perspective. Biota Neotropica, 6, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busi, R.et al. (2013). Herbicide-resistant weeds: from research and knowledge to future needs. Evolutionary Applications, 6, 1218–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cahn, M. A. & Harper, J. L. (1976a). The biology of the leaf mark polymorphism in Trifolium repens. 1. Distribution of phenotypes at a local scale. Heredity, 37, 309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahn, M. A. & Harper, J. L. (1976b). The biology of the leaf mark polymorphism in Trifolium repens. 2. Evidence for the selection of marks by rumen fistulated sheep. Heredity, 37, 327–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, A. J. (1958). Logic and memory in Linnaeus's system of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 169, 144–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, A. J. (1996). John Ray on ‘Accidents’. Archives of Natural History, 23, 343–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, A. J. (1999). John Ray on species. Archives of Natural History, 26, 223–38.Google Scholar

Cain, A. J. (2008). The post-Linnaean development of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 170, 234–44.Google Scholar

Cain, J. & Ruse, M. (2009). Descended from Darwin. Insights into the history of evolutionary studies, 1900–1970. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 99 (1), 1–386.Google Scholar

Cain, M. L., Milligan, B. G. & Strand, A. E. (2000). Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. American Journal of Botany, 87, 1217–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cairns, J. (1998). Ecological restoration. In Encyclopedia of ecology & environmental management, ed. Calow, P., pp. 217–19. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cairns, J. (2002). Rationale for restoration. In Handbook of ecological restoration, ed. Perrow, M. R. & Davy, A. J., pp.10–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caisse, M. & Antonovics, J. (1978). Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. IX. Evolution of reproductive isolation in clinal populations. Heredity, 40, 371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callender, L. A. (1988). Gregor Mendel: an opponent of descent with modification. History of Science, 26, 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calsbeek, B.et al. (2011). Comparing the genetic architecture and potential response to selection of invasive and native populations of Reed Canary Grass. Evolutionary Applications, 4, 726–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Calsbeek, R., Thompson, J. R. & Richardson, J. E. (2003). A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Molecular Ecology, 12, 1021–9.Google Scholar

Caltagirone, L. E. (1981). Landmark examples in classical biological control. Annual Review of Entomology, 26, 213–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camacho, J. P. M. (2005). B chromosomes. In The evolution of the genome, ed. Gregory, T. R., pp. 223–86, London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Camp, W. H. & Gilly, C. L. (1943). The structure and origin of species. Brittonia, 4, 323–85.Google Scholar

Campbell, R. C. (1967). Statistics for biologists. London & New York: Cambridge University Press. [edn: 1974].Google Scholar

Campbell, S. A & Kessler, A. (2013). Plant mating system transitions drive the macroevolution of defence strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 3973–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlo, T. A., Tewksbury, J. J. & del Rio, C. M. (2009). A new method to track seed dispersal and recruitment using N-15 isotope enrichment. Ecology, 90, 3516–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlquist, S. (1965). Island life. A natural history of the islands of the world. New York: Natural History Press.Google Scholar

Carlquist, S. (1974). Island biology. New York & London: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, S., Mayer, V. & Michael, J. (2009). Phylogenetic relationships, taxonomy, and morphological evolution in Dipsacaceae (Dipsacales) inferred by DNA sequence data. Taxon, 58, 1075–91.Google Scholar

Carney, S. E., Cruzan, M. B. & Arnold, M. L. (1994). Reproductive interactions between hybridizing Irises: analyses of pollen-tube growth and fertilization success. American Journal of Botany, 81, 1169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caron, G. E. & Leblanc, R. (1992). Pollen contamination on a small black spruce seedling seed orchard for 3 consecutive years. Forest Ecology & Management, 53, 587–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, G. D.et al. (1999). Chromosome numbers in Compositae. XVIII. American Journal of Botany, 86, 1003–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar

Catcheside, D. G. (1939). A position effect in Oenothera. Journal of Genetics, 38, 345–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Catcheside, D. G. (1947). The P-locus position effect in Oenothera. Journal of Genetics, 48, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caujapé-Castells, J. (2004). Boomerangs of biodiversity? The interchange of biodiversity between mainland north Africa and the Canary Islands as inferred from cpDNA RFLPs in genus Androcymbium. Botánica Macaronésica, 25, 53–69.Google Scholar

Caujapé-Castells, J.et al. (2010). Conservation of oceanic island floras: present and future global challenges. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 12, 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cayouette, J. E. & Morisset, P. (1986). Chromosome studies on the Carex salina complex (Cyperaceae section Cryptocarpae) in northeastern North America. Cytologia, 51, 817–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadwick, M. J. & Salt, J. K. (1969). Population differentiation within Agrostis tenuis L. in response to colliery spoil substrate factors. Nature, 224, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaing, G. C. K.et al. (2009). Major flowering time gene, FLOWERING LOCUS C, regulates seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 11661–6.Google Scholar

Chakraborty, R., Meagher, T. R. & Smouse, P. E. (1988). Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics, 118, 527–36.Google ScholarPubMed

Challice, J. & Kovanda, M. (1978). Chemotaxonomic survey of the genus Sorbus in Europe. Naturwissenschaften, 65, 111–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, S. & Dunwell, J. M. (2008). Gene flow, risk assessment and the environmental release of transgenic plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chanway, C. P.Holl, F. B. & Turkington, R. (1989). Effect of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar. trifolii genotype on specificity between Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne. Journal of Ecology, 77, 1150–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, M. A. & Abbott, R. J. (2009). Introgression of fitness genes across a ploidy barrier. New Phytologist, 186, 63–71.Google ScholarPubMed

Chapman, M. A. & Burke, J. M. (2006). Letting the gene out of the bottle: the population genetics of genetically modified crops. New Phytologist, 170, 429–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charlesworth, B. (2009). Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nature Reviews of Genetics, 10, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charlesworth, D. (1985). Distribution of dioecy and self-incompatibility in angiosperms. In Evolution – essays in honour of John Maynard Smith, ed. Greenwood, P. J. & Slatkin, M., pp. 237–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, D. (2002). Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity, 88, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charlesworth, D. (2006). Evolution of plant breeding systems. Current Biology, 16, R726–R735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charlesworth, D. (2010). Self-incompatibility. F1000 Report Biology, 2,68. Published online, DOI:10.3410/B2-68.CrossRef

Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1979). The evolutionary genetics of sexual systems in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B, 205, 513–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 237–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, D. & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature, 10, 783–96.Google ScholarPubMed

Charlesworth, D.et al. (2005). Plant self-incompatibility systems: a molecular evolutionary perspective. New Phytologist, 168, 61–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Charnov, E. L. (1988). Foreword. In Plant reproductive ecology, ed. Doust, J. Lovett & Doust, L. Lovett, pp. ix–x. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chase, M. W.et al. (1993). Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide-sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 80, 528–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, M. W., Fay, M. F. & Savolainen, V. (2000). Higher-level classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data. Taxon, 49, 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, M. W.et al. (2005). Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 359, 1889–95.Google Scholar

Chase, M. W.et al. (2009). Murderous plants: Victorian Gothic, Darwin and modern insight into vegetable carnivory. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 329–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, J.-Q.et al. (2008). Over-expression of OsDREB genes leads to enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biotechnology Letters, 30, 2191–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, J.et al. (2012). Disentangling the roles of history and local selection in shaping clinal variation in allele frequencies and gene expression in Norway Spruce (Picea abies). Genetics, 191, 865–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, J.et al. (2014). Clinal variation at phenology-related genes in Spruce; parallel evolution in FTL2 and Gigantea?Genetics, 197, 1025–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chen, Q. & Armstrong, K. (1994). Genomic in situ hybridization in Avena sativa. Genome, 37, 607–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheplick, G. P. & Quinn, J. A. (1982). Amphicarpum purshii and the ‘pessimistic strategy’ in amphicarpic annuals with subterranean fruit. Oecologia, 52, 327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheplick, G. P. & Quinn, J. A. (1983). The shift in aerial/subterranean fruit ratio in Amphicarpum purshii: causes and significance. Oecologia, 57, 374–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheptou, P. O. (2012). Clarifying Baker's Law. Annals of Botany, 109, 633–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chester, M.et al. (2007). Parentage of endemic Sorbus L. (Rosaceae) species in the British Isles. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 154, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chester, M.et al. (2010a). Review of the application of modern cytological methods (FISH/GISH) to the study of reticulation (Polyploidy/Hybridisation). Genes (Basel), 1, 166–92, DOI:10.3390/genes1020166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chester, M.et al. (2010b). Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 1176–81.Google Scholar

Choi, Y. D. (2004). Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: towards ‘futuristic’ restoration. Ecological Research, 19, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choi, Y. D. (2007). Restoration ecology to the future: a call for a new paradigm. Restoration Ecology, 15, 351–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomorro, S.et al. (2012). Pollination patterns and plant breeding systems in the Galápagos: a review. Annals of Botany, 110, 1489–1501.Google Scholar

Chung, M. G., Hamrick, J. L., Jones, S. B. & Derda, G. S. (1991). Isozyme variation within and among populations of Hosta (Liliaceae) in Korea. Systematic Botany, 16, 667–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, S. A. & Taylor, D. R. (2007). The evolution of reproductive isolation in spatially structured populations. Evolution, 56, 1859–62.Google Scholar

Cicerone, R. J. & Nurse, P. (2014). Climate change: evidence and causes. US National Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society.Google Scholar

Claessen, D.et al. (2005a). Which traits promote persistence of feral GM crops? Part 1: implications of environmental stochasticity. Oikos, 110, 20–29.Google Scholar

Claessen, D.et al. (2005b). Which traits promote persistence of feral GM crops? Part 2: implications of metapopulation structure. Oikos, 110, 30–42.Google Scholar

Clapham, A. R., Tutin, T. G. & Warburg, E. F. (1981). Excursion flora of the British Isles. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, B. R.et al. (2009). Taxonomy as an escience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 367, 953–66.Google ScholarPubMed

Clark, D. (2005). Molecular biology. Burlington, MA, & London: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Clark, L. V. & Jasieniuk, M. (2012). Spontaneous hybrids between native and exotic Rubus in the Western United States produce offspring both by apomixis and by sexual recombination. Heredity, 109, 320–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, P.et al. (2009). The Last Glacial Maximum. Science, 325, 710–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarke, G. M. (1980). Statistics and experimental design. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. T., Warnock, R. C. M. & Donoghue, P. C. J. (2011). Establishing a timescale for plant evolution. New Phytologist, 192, 266–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar