Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:02:45.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - On blending and the mora: comments on Kubozono

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Mary E. Beckman
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Bruce Connell
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Amalia Arvaniti
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In his paper, Kubozono nicely summarizes the literature on the mora as a salient unit in speech production in Japanese, and then describes new results which he takes as evidence for the mora as a comparably salient unit in speech perception. His experiments presented pairs of English CVC monosyllables, such as hill and top, to which subjects responded with a third word blending the two stimulus words. Responses differed for different subject groups; English speakers combined the onset of the first word with the rhyme of the second (hill + top = hop), whereas Japanese speakers usually took both the onset and the nucleus from the first word and only the coda consonant from the second (hill + top = hip). Pilot results for two Italian and nine Spanish speakers also showed the Japanese pattern.

Kubozono interprets these results as indicating a difference in syllable-internal prosodic structure among the languages, illustrated in (la) for English and (lb) for the other three, (lc) is Derwing, Yoon & Cho's (1993) alternative interpretation of the Japanese pattern of responses, which their Korean subjects also showed in a similar word-blend experiment. The difference between hypotheses (lb) and (lc) should not obscure the premise in common: Kubozono, like Derwing et al. (1993), takes the pattern of blends as evidence that speakers parse syllables exhaustively into some set of syllable-internal prosodic constituents which can differ from language to language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Phonology and Phonetic Evidence
Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV
, pp. 157 - 167
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×