Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- An Idea we Cannot do Without
- Needs and Global Justice
- Need, Humiliation and Independence
- Needs and Ethics in Ancient Philosophy
- Aristotle on Necessities and Needs
- Need, Care and Obligation
- Needs, Facts, Goodness, and Truth
- Fundamental Needs
- Needs, Rights, and Collective Obligations
- Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?
- Needs and Capabilities
Needs and Ethics in Ancient Philosophy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- An Idea we Cannot do Without
- Needs and Global Justice
- Need, Humiliation and Independence
- Needs and Ethics in Ancient Philosophy
- Aristotle on Necessities and Needs
- Need, Care and Obligation
- Needs, Facts, Goodness, and Truth
- Fundamental Needs
- Needs, Rights, and Collective Obligations
- Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?
- Needs and Capabilities
Summary
Aristotle
What I propose to do in this short paper is to outline two different approaches to needs in Greek philosophy. The first is the reasonably familiar approach used by Aristotle, and, in some moods, by Plato; the second is a rather less well-known approach which can with some justice be associated with Socrates, and/or Plato when he is not in an Aristotelian mood (if I may so put it)—and also the Stoics, who seem to have picked up some distinctly Socratic ways of thinking. The Aristotelian line, if not necessarily familiar as Aristotle's, will be familiar just insofar as it gives some degree of that recognition to needs that most moderns would suppose the idea should be given. What I am calling the Socratic line, by contrast, appears to leave no room for the idea of needs at all (or at least, that will be my way of putting it for now; I shall need a rather different formulation later on). It is this second, ‘Socratic’, approach that primarily interests me, not least because it is non-standard.
But first the Aristotelian perspective. I quote from a recent review of a book on the philosophy of mind:
Virtue theories understand human beings as members of a species who flourish in distinctively communal forms of life; given the right upbringing and circumstances, individual fulfilment and communal wellbeing are mutually supporting. […]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Philosophy of Need , pp. 99 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006