Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Value in Nature and the Nature of Value
- Ecology and the Ethics of Environmental Restoration
- Rehabilitating Nature and Making Nature Habitable
- Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
- Values, Reasons and the Environment
- Awe and Humility: Intrinsic Value in Nature. Beyond an Earthbound Environmental Ethics
- The End of Anthropocentrism?
- Global Religion
- Kant and the Moral Considerability of Non-Rational Beings
- The Idea of the Environment
- Chaos and Order, Environment and Anarchy
- Natural Capital
- Some Philosophical Assessments of Environmental Disobedience
- Global Environmental Justice
- Environmental and Medical Bioethics in Late Modernity: Anthony Giddens, Genetic Engineering and the Post-Modern State
- Highlights and Connections
- Bibliography
- Index
Global Environmental Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Value in Nature and the Nature of Value
- Ecology and the Ethics of Environmental Restoration
- Rehabilitating Nature and Making Nature Habitable
- Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
- Values, Reasons and the Environment
- Awe and Humility: Intrinsic Value in Nature. Beyond an Earthbound Environmental Ethics
- The End of Anthropocentrism?
- Global Religion
- Kant and the Moral Considerability of Non-Rational Beings
- The Idea of the Environment
- Chaos and Order, Environment and Anarchy
- Natural Capital
- Some Philosophical Assessments of Environmental Disobedience
- Global Environmental Justice
- Environmental and Medical Bioethics in Late Modernity: Anthony Giddens, Genetic Engineering and the Post-Modern State
- Highlights and Connections
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Philosophers, like generals, tend to fight the last war. While activists and policy-makers are in the trenches fighting the problems of today, intellectuals are typically studying the problems of yesterday.
There are some good reasons for this. It is more difficult to assess and interpret present events than those which are behind us. Time is needed for reflection and to gather reliable information about what has occurred. The desire to understand leads to a style of life that is primarily contemplative and retrospective.
But there are also bad reasons for the relative neglect of contemporary problems. Philosophers typically write about what other philosophers write about, and if no-one has written about a problem it is difficult to get anyone to write about it. Philosophy is also a deeply historical subject and for the most part the tradition either has been silent about environmental problems or what it has said is itself part of the problem. Moreover, philosophers have a toolbox of theories, methods and concepts and like most people they want to work on problems that their tools can help to solve. And as I shall try to show, the results of applying philosophical theories of justice to problems of the global environment are disappointing.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philosophy and the Natural Environment , pp. 199 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 4
- Cited by