Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Value in Nature and the Nature of Value
- Ecology and the Ethics of Environmental Restoration
- Rehabilitating Nature and Making Nature Habitable
- Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
- Values, Reasons and the Environment
- Awe and Humility: Intrinsic Value in Nature. Beyond an Earthbound Environmental Ethics
- The End of Anthropocentrism?
- Global Religion
- Kant and the Moral Considerability of Non-Rational Beings
- The Idea of the Environment
- Chaos and Order, Environment and Anarchy
- Natural Capital
- Some Philosophical Assessments of Environmental Disobedience
- Global Environmental Justice
- Environmental and Medical Bioethics in Late Modernity: Anthony Giddens, Genetic Engineering and the Post-Modern State
- Highlights and Connections
- Bibliography
- Index
The End of Anthropocentrism?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction
- Value in Nature and the Nature of Value
- Ecology and the Ethics of Environmental Restoration
- Rehabilitating Nature and Making Nature Habitable
- Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?
- Values, Reasons and the Environment
- Awe and Humility: Intrinsic Value in Nature. Beyond an Earthbound Environmental Ethics
- The End of Anthropocentrism?
- Global Religion
- Kant and the Moral Considerability of Non-Rational Beings
- The Idea of the Environment
- Chaos and Order, Environment and Anarchy
- Natural Capital
- Some Philosophical Assessments of Environmental Disobedience
- Global Environmental Justice
- Environmental and Medical Bioethics in Late Modernity: Anthony Giddens, Genetic Engineering and the Post-Modern State
- Highlights and Connections
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
What is it to be Central?
Are human beings in some sense central to the cosmos? It used to seem obvious that they were. It seems less obvious now. But the idea is still powerful in our thinking, and it may be worth while asking just what it has meant.
There is of course a minor point of view from which we really are central—for our own lives, our own species do provide the natural focus. Our starting-point, the angle from which we look at things, is bound to be our own region. In the same way, if we think about self-centredness, each of us does unavoidably see our own self as in some sense the centre of the world.
This parallel is surely helpful. In neither case can we spread our consciousness impartially over the whole scene. We do have powers of sympathy, but since we are finite beings, those powers are necessarily limited. We have no choice but to be specially interested in ourselves and those close to us. As Bishop Butler pointed out, this kind of priority is not necessarily a bad thing. Indeed it is vital that we do love and care for ourselves properly. If we have not enough self-love, if we despise or hate ourselves, we cannot love other people.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philosophy and the Natural Environment , pp. 103 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 7
- Cited by