Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T23:07:26.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Dynamics of colloids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

George D. J. Phillies
George D. J. Phillies
Affiliation:
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

We move in this chapter from random coils to colloidal particles. This chapter treats transport properties of colloid solutions that are directly analogous to the polymer properties considered in the remainder of this volume, including single-particle diffusion, mutual diffusion and quasielastic light scattering, rotational diffusion, viscosity, and viscoelastic properties. Colloidal particles have a wide range of shapes; this chapter emphasizes spheres. Some systems treated here are thermo-dynamically stable; in others, the density difference between colloid and solvent is large enough such that the particles tend to settle. This distinction is purely a consequence of the strength of the local gravitational field, and has no fundamental significance.

Why is it of interest to consider colloid dynamics?

First, the fundamental forces between neutral colloidal spheres are the same as the fundamental forces between neutral polymers. Polymers and colloids are equally subject to excluded-volume forces, hydrodynamic forces, van der Waals interactions, and to the random thermal forces that drive Brownian motion.

Second, the dynamic equations for polymer motion and for colloid motion are qualitatively the same, namely they are generalized Langevin (e.g.,Mori–Zwanzig) equations, including direct and hydrodynamic forces on each colloid particle or polymer segment, hydrodynamic drag forces, and “random” thermal forces due to solvent motion, all leading to coupled diffusive motion.

Because the forces and the dynamic equations of motion are fundamentally the same, it should not be surprising that the dynamic behaviors of polymers and colloids have substantial similarities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Phenomenology of Polymer Solution Dynamics , pp. 287 - 319
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] J. G., Kirkwood and J, Riseman. The intrinsic viscosities and diffusion constants of flexible macromolecules in solution. J. Chem. Phys., 16 (1948), 565–573.Google Scholar
[2] G. J., Kynch. The slow motion of two or more spheres through a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech., 5 (1959), 193–208.Google Scholar
[3] J. C., Crocker. Measurement of the hydrodynamic corrections to the Brownian motion of two colloidal spheres. J. Chem. Phys., 106 (1997), 2837–2840.Google Scholar
[4] J.-C, Meiners and S. R., Quake. Direct measurement of hydrodynamic cross correlations between two particles in an external potential. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82 (1999), 2211–2214.Google Scholar
[5] M, Brunner, J, Dobnikar, H.-H, von Gruenberg, and C, Bechinger. Direct measurement of three-body interactions amongst charged colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (2004), 078301 1–4.Google Scholar
[6] W. G., Hoover and F. H., Ree. Melting transition and communal entropy for hard spheres. J. Chem. Phys., 49 (1968), 3609–3617.Google Scholar
[7] P. Y., Cheng and H. K., Schachman. Studies on the validity of the Einstein viscosity law and Stokes' law of sedimentation. J. Polymer Sci., 16 (1955), 19–31.Google Scholar
[8] P. N., Pusey and W., Megen. Measurement of the short-time self-mobility of particles in concentrated suspension. Evidence for many-particle hydrodynamic interactions. J. Physique, 44 (1983), 285–291.Google Scholar
[9] A., Veluwen, H. N., W.|Lekkerkerker, C. G., Kruif, and A., Vrij. Measurement of the short-time self-diffusion coefficient in dilute and concentrated suspensions: Influence of direct particle interactions. J. Chem. Phys., 87 (1987), 4873–4880.Google Scholar
[10] V, Degiorgio, R, Piazza, and R. B., Jones. Rotational diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions of hard spheres. Phys. Rev. E, 52 (1995), 2707–2717.Google Scholar
[11] A., Blaaderen, J, Peetermans, G, Maret, and J. K. G., Dhont. Long-time selfdiffusion of spherical colloidal particles measured with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. J. Chem. Phys., 96 (1992), 4591–4603.Google Scholar
[12] M. M., Kops-Werkhoven, C., Pathmamanoharan, A., Vrij, and H. M., Fijnaut. Concentration-dependence of the self-diffusion coefficient of hard, spherical-particles measured with photon-correlation spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys., 77 (1982), 5913–5922; also M. M. Kops-Werkhoven. Unpublished D.Sc. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Te Utrecht (1982).Google Scholar
[13] W., Megen, S. M., Underwood, and I., Snook. Tracer diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. J. Chem. Phys., 85 (1986), 4065–4072.Google Scholar
[14] W., Megen and S. M., Underwood. Tracer diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. II. Non-Gaussian effects. J. Chem. Phys., 88 (1988), 7841–7846.Google Scholar
[15] W., Megen and S. M., Underwood. Motions of particles in concentrated dispersions as observed by dynamic light scattering. Langmuir, 6 (1990), 35–42.Google Scholar
[16] A., Imhof, A., Blaaderen, G., Maret, J., Mellema, and J. K. G., Dhont. A comparison between the long-time self-diffusion and low shear viscosity of concentrated dispersions of charged colloidal silica spheres. J. Chem. Phys., 100 (1994), 2170–2181.Google Scholar
[17] G. H., Koenderinck and A. P., Philipse. Rotational and translational self-diffusion in colloidal sphere suspensions and the applicability of generalized Stokes–Einstein relations. Langmuir, 16 (2001), 5631–5638.Google Scholar
[18] M. H., Blees, J. M., Geurts, and J. C., Leyte. Self-diffusion of charged polybutadiene latex particles in water measured by pulsed field gradient NMR. Langmuir, 12 (1996), 1947–1957.Google Scholar
[19] A., Brands, H., Versmold, and W., Megen. Tracer particle diffusion in crystal-like ordered colloidal suspensions. J. Chem. Phys., 110 (1999), 1283–1289.Google Scholar
[20] M. M., Kops-Werkhoven and H. M., Fijnaut. Dynamic light scattering and sedimentation experiments on silica dispersions at finite concentrations. J. Chem. Phys., 74 (1981), 1618–1625.Google Scholar
[21] H. J., Mos, C., Pathmamanoharan, J. K. G., Dhont, and C. G., Kruif. Scattered light intensity cross correlation. II. Experimental. J. Chem. Phys., 84 (1986), 45–49.Google Scholar
[22] G. D. J., Phillies. Suppression of multiple scattering effects in quasi-elastic light scattering by homodyne cross-correlation techniques. J. Chem. Phys., 74 (1981), 260–262.Google Scholar
[23] G. D. J., Phillies. Experimental demonstration of multiple-scattering suppression in quasielastic-light-scattering by homodyne coincidence techniques. Phys. Rev. A, 24 (1981), 1939–1943.Google Scholar
[24] P. N., Segre, O. P., Behrend, and P. N., Pusey. Short-time Brownian motion in colloidal suspensions: Experiment and simulation. Phys. Rev. E, 52 (1995), 5070–5083.Google Scholar
[25] P. N., Segre and P. N., Pusey. Scaling of the dynamic scattering function of concentrated colloidal suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77 (1996), 771–774.Google Scholar
[26] P. N., Segre, S. P., Meeker, P. N., Pusey, and W. C. K., Poon. Viscosity and structural relaxation in suspensions of hard-sphere colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995), 958–961.Google Scholar
[27] M., Delsanti, J., Chang, P., Lesieur, and B., Cabane. Dynamic properties of aqueous dispersions of nanometric particles near the fluid-solid transition. J. Chem. Phys., 105 (1996), 7200–7209.Google Scholar
[28] G., Bueldt. Interpretation of quasi-elastic light scattering measurements from moderately concentrated solutions. Eur. Polym. J., 12 (1976), 239–242.Google Scholar
[29] R., Brown. A brief account of microscopical observations made in the months of June, July and August, 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies. Phil. Mag., 4 (1828), 161–173.Google Scholar
[30] J., Perrin. Brownian motion and molecular reality. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 18 (1909), 1–114.Google Scholar
[31] A., Kasper, E., Bartsch, and H., Sillescu. Self-diffusion in concentrated colloid suspensions studied by digital video microscopy of core-shell tracer particles. Langmuir, 14 (1998), 5004–5010.Google Scholar
[32] W. K., Kegel and A., Blaaderen. Direct observation of dynamical heterogeneities in colloidal hard-sphere suspensions. Science, 287 (2000), 290–293.Google Scholar
[33] E. R., Weeks, J. C., Crocker, A. W., Levitt, A., Schofield, and D. A., Weitz. Threedimensional direct imaging of structural relaxation near the colloidal glass transition. Science, 287 (2000), 627–631.Google Scholar
[34] E. R., Weeks and D. A., Weitz. Properties of cage rearrangements observed near the colloidal glass transition. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89 (2002), 095704 1–4.Google Scholar
[35] Y., Gao and M., Kilfoil. Direct imaging of dynamical heterogeneities near the colloid-gel transition. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99 (2007), 078301 1–4.Google Scholar
[36] W., Megen, S. M., Underwood, J., Muller, et al.Progr. Theor. Phys. Supp., 126 (1997), 171–180.
[37] S. C., Glotzer, V. N., Novikov, and T. B., Schroeder. Time-dependent, four-point density correlation function description of dynamical heterogeneity and decoupling in supercooled liquids. J. Chem. Phys., 112 (2000), 509–512.Google Scholar
[38] C., Donati, S. C., Glotzer, P. H., Poole, W., Kob, and S. J., Plimpton. Spatial correlations of mobility and immobility in a glass-forming Lennard–Jones liquid. Phys. Rev. E, 60, (1999), 3107–3119.Google Scholar
[39] N., Lacevic, F. W., Starr, T. B., Schroeder, V. N., Novikov, and S. C., Glotzer. Growing correlation length on cooling below the onset of caging in a simulated glass-forming liquid. Phys. Rev. E, 66 (2002), 030101(R).Google Scholar
[40] R., Piazza and V., Degiorgio. Rotational diffusion of hard spheres: Forward depolarized light-scattering measurements and comparison to theory and simulation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matt., 8 (1996), 9497–9502.Google Scholar
[41] M. P., Lettinga, C. M., Kats, and A. P., Philipse. Rotational diffusion of tracer spheres in packings and dispersions of colloidal spheres studied with time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy. Langmuir, 16 (2000), 6166–6172.Google Scholar
[42] G. H., Koenderinck, H., Zhang, M. P., Lettinga, G., Naegele, and A. P., Philipse. Rotational tracer diffusion in binary colloidal sphere mixtures. Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2001), 022401 1–4.Google Scholar
[43] A., Toelle and H., Sillescu. Rotational diffusion of colloid spheres in suspension investigated by deuteron NMR.Langmuir, 10 (1994), 4420–4422.Google Scholar
[44] M., Delong and P. S., Russo. Particle size distribution by zero angle depolarized light scattering. In ACS Advances Series #227, Eds. C., Craver and T., Provder, (Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1990) 65–81.Google Scholar
[45] D., Kivelson and P. A., Madden. Light scattering studies of molecular liquids. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem., 31 (1980), 523–558.Google Scholar
[46] G. K., Batchelor. The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech., 83 (1977), 97–117.Google Scholar
[47] A. R., Altenberger and J. S., Dahler. A renormalization group calculation of the viscosity of a hard-sphere suspension. J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 189 (1997), 379–381.Google Scholar
[48] A. R., Altenberger and J. S., Dahler. Application of a new renormalization group to the equation of state of a hard-sphere fluid. Phys. Rev. E, 54 (1996), 6242–6252.Google Scholar
[49] I. M., Schepper, E. G. D., Cohen, and R., Verberg. Comment on “Viscosity and structural relaxation in suspensions of hard-sphere colloids.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 77 (1996), 584.Google Scholar
[50] S.-E., Phan, W. B., Russel, Z., Cheng, et al.Phase transition, equation of state, and limiting shear viscosities of hard sphere dispersions. Phys. Rev. E, 54 (1996), 6633–6645.Google Scholar
[51] S. P., Meeker, W. C. K., Poon, and P. N., Pusey. Concentration dependence of the low-shear viscosity of suspensions of hard-sphere colloids. Phys. Rev. E, 55 (1997), 5718–5722.Google Scholar
[52] J. C., der Werff and C. G., Kruif. Hard-sphere colloidal dispersions: The scaling of rheological properties with particle size, volume fraction, and shear rate. J. Rheol., 33 (1989), 421–454.Google Scholar
[53] C. G., Kruif, E. M. F., Iersel, A., Vrij, and W. B., Russel. Hard sphere colloidal dispersions: Viscosity as a function of shear rate and volume fraction. J. Chem. Phys., 83 (1985), 4717–4725.Google Scholar
[54] W. C. K., Poon, S. P., Meeker, P. N., Pusey, and P. N., Segre. Viscosity and structural relaxation in concentrated hard-sphere colloids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 67(1996), 179–189.
[55] D. A. R., Jones, B., Leary, and D. V., Boger. The rheology of a concentrated colloidal suspension of hard spheres. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 147 (1991), 479–495.Google Scholar
[56] M., Marshall and C. F., Zukowski, IV. Experimental studies on the rheology of hardsphere suspensions near the glass transition. J. Phys. Chem., 94 (1990), 1164–1171.Google Scholar
[57] J. D., Lee, J.-H., So, and S.-M., Yang. Rheological behavior and stability of concentrated silica suspensions. J. Rheol., 43 (1999), 1117–1140.Google Scholar
[58] G. D. J., Phillies. Polymer solution viscoelasticity from two-parameter temporal scaling. J. Chem. Phys., 110 (1999), 5989–5992.Google Scholar
[59] T., Shikata and D. S., Pearson. Viscoelastic behavior of concentrated spherical suspensions. J. Rheol., 38 (1994), 601–616.Google Scholar
[60] M., Antonietti, T., Pakula, and W., Bremser. Rheology of small spherical polystyrene microgels: A direct proof for a new transport mechanism in bulk polymers besides reptation. Macromolecules, 28 (1995), 4227–4233.Google Scholar
[61] M., Tokuyama and I., Oppenheim. On the theory of concentrated hard-sphere suspensions. Physica A, 216 (1995), 85–119.Google Scholar
[62] M., Tokuyama. Self-diffusion in multi-component glass-forming systems. Physica A, 388 (2009), 3083–3092.Google Scholar
[63] G. D. J., Phillies. Observations upon the dynamic structure factor of interacting spherical polyelectrolytes. J. Chem. Phys., 79 (1983), 2325–2332.Google Scholar
[64] P., Doherty and G. B., Benedek. Effect of electric charge on diffusion of macromolecules. J. Chem. Phys., 61 (1974), 5426–5434.Google Scholar
[65] G. D. J., Phillies. Effect of intermacromolecular interactions on diffusion. I. Twocomponent solutions. J. Chem. Phys., 60 (1974), 976–982.Google Scholar
[66] G. D. J., Phillies. Effect of intermacromolecular interactions on diffusion. II. Threecomponent solutions. J. Chem. Phys., 60 (1974), 983–989.Google Scholar
[67] G. D. J., Phillies. Effect of intermacromolecular interactions on diffusion. III. Electrophoresis in three-component solutions. J. Chem. Phys., 59 (1973), 2613–2617.Google Scholar
[68] G. D. J., Phillies. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and non-ideal solutions. Biopolymers, 14 (1975), 499–508.Google Scholar
[69] V. G., Taratuta, A., Holschbach, G. M., Thurston, A., Blankschtein, and G. B., Benedek. Liquid–liquid phase separation of aqueous lysozyme solutions: Effects of pH and salt identity. J. Chem. Phys., 94 (1990), 2140–2144.Google Scholar
[70] G. D. J., Phillies. Comment on “Critical behavior of a binary mixture of protein and salt water.” Phys. Rev. Lett., 55 (1985), 1341.Google Scholar
[71] M., Muschol and F., Rosenberger. Liquid–liquid phase separation in supersaturated lysozyme solutions and associated precipitate formation/crystallization. J. Chem. Phys., 107 (1997), 1953–1962.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Dynamics of colloids
  • George D. J. Phillies, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts
  • Book: Phenomenology of Polymer Solution Dynamics
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843181.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Dynamics of colloids
  • George D. J. Phillies, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts
  • Book: Phenomenology of Polymer Solution Dynamics
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843181.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Dynamics of colloids
  • George D. J. Phillies, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts
  • Book: Phenomenology of Polymer Solution Dynamics
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843181.011
Available formats
×