Turkish family structure and functioning

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511720437.010

7 - Turkish family structure and functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010

Bilge Ataca

Edited by

Sevda Bekman and

Ayhan Aksu-Koç

Foreword by

M. Brewster Smith

Show author details

Sevda Bekman: Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Ayhan Aksu-Koç: Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A former student and a current colleague of Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı, I have found myself ever inspired by her character and her theoretical work. Originally a non-psychology major, the course of my professional life changed dramatically when Kağıtçıbaşı introduced me to social psychology and cultural influences on human behavior. Raised in a “family of psychological interdependence” with an autonomous-related self, I have been very much intrigued by her Model of Family Change, which guided the present chapter.

Turkey is at the crossroads between the East and the West, characterized by much heterogeneity and social change. This has led to the emergence of many Turkish family prototypes (Ataca 2006; Sunar and Fişek 2005). In general, they could be categorized under two prototypes, namely, the traditional family of interdependence and the family of psychological (emotional) interdependence based on Kağıtçıbaşı's (1990, 1996, 2007) Model of Family Change. Kağıtçıbaşı's model distinguishes among three prototypical family patterns. The first, “family model of interdependence,” is more common in less developed, rural, agrarian contexts with “cultures of relatedness” or collectivism and is characterized by both psychological and material interdependencies in the family system. The contrasting pattern of “family model of independence” is more common in western industrial urban settings with individualistic cultures in which both dependencies are low. A third pattern, the “family model of psychological (emotional) interdependence,” is a synthesis of the first two patterns and characterizes the urban and more developed socio-economic contexts with cultures of relatedness, in which psychological interdependencies continue, while material interdependencies weaken.

Type: Chapter
Information: Perspectives on Human Development, Family, and Culture , pp. 108 - 125

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720437.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abadan-Unat, N., Women in the Developing World: Evidence from Turkey (Colorado: University of Denver, 1986).Google Scholar

Albert, I., Trommsdorff, G., Mayer, B., and Schwarz, B., “Value of children in urban and rural Indonesia: Socio-demographic indicators, cultural aspects and empirical findings,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst Science, 2005), pp. 171–208).Google Scholar

Ataca, B., “Turkey,” in Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 467–74.Google Scholar

Ataca, B. and Sunar, D., “Continuity and change in Turkish urban family life,” Psychology and Developing Societies, 11 (1999), 77–90.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ataca, B., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Diri, A., “The Turkish family and the value of children: Trends over time,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst, 2005), pp. 91–119.Google Scholar

Aytaç, I. A., “Intergenerational living arrangements in Turkey,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 13 (1998), 241–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baştuğ, S., “Household and family in Turkey: An historical perspective,” in Özdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and Dependence in Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective(Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2002), pp. 99–115.Google Scholar

Berik, G., “Towards an understanding of gender hierarchy in Turkey: A comparative analysis of carpet-weaving villages,” in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader (London: Zed Books, 1995), pp. 112–27.Google Scholar

Delaney, C., The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Duben, A., “The significance of family and kinship in urban Turkey,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), pp. 73–99.Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. T., “Perceptions of the value of children,” in Bulatao, R., Lee, R. D., Hollerbach, P. E., and Bongaarts, J. (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in the Developing Countries (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983), pp. 347–69.Google Scholar

Fişek, G. O., “Gender hierarchy: Is it a useful concept in describing family structure?,” in Lawick, J. and Sanders, M. (eds.), Family, Gender and Beyond (Heemstede, The Netherlands: LS Books, 1995), pp. 63–72.Google Scholar

Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Synthesis: How similar and how different are families across cultures?,” in Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006a), pp. 186–240.CrossRef Google Scholar

Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006b).CrossRef Google Scholar

Georgas, J., Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Poortinga, Y. H., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Orung, S. et al., “Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16-culture study,”International Journal of Psychology, 36 (2001), 289–300.CrossRef Google Scholar

Georgas, J., Vijver, F. J. R., Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Methodology of the study,” in Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006c), pp. 111–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoffman, L. W., “The value of children to parents and childrearing parents,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-cultural Psychology (Lisse, The Netherlands: Swetz & Zeitlinger, 1987), pp. 159–70.Google Scholar

Hoffman, L. W., “Cross-cultural differences in child-rearing goals,”New Directions for Child Development, 40 (1988), 99–122.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hortaçsu, N., “Targets of communication during adolescence,”Journal of Adolescence, 12 (1989), 253–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hortaçsu, N., “Prelude to marriage in Ankara: Educational level, reasons for marriage, feelings for spouse and families,”Boğaziçi Journal, 9 (1995), 185–205.Google Scholar

Hortaçsu, N., Gençöz, T., and Oral, A., “Perceived functions of family and friends during childhood, adolescence, and youth: Developmental theories of two Turkish groups,”International Journal of Psychology, 30 (1995), 591–606.CrossRef Google Scholar

İmamoğlu, O., “An interdependence model of human development,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-cultural Psychology (Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1987), pp. 138–45.Google Scholar

İmamoğlu, O. and Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., “1970lerden 1990lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları [Value preferences from the 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university],”Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14 (1999), 1–22.Google Scholar

İmamoğlu, O. and Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., “Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts,”Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130 (2004), 277–306.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., The Changing Value of Children in Turkey (Publ. No. 60-E) (Honolulu: East-West Center, 1982).Google Scholar

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Culture of separateness-culture of relatedness,” in Klopp, C. (ed.), 1984 Vision and Reality. Papers in Comparative Studies. Volume 4 (Columbus: Ohio State University, 1985), pp. 91–99.Google Scholar

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change,” in Berman, J. (ed.), Cross-cultural Perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (Lincoln: Nebraska University Press, 1990), pp. 135–200.Google Scholar

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Family and Human Development across Cultures: A View from the Other Side. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).Google Scholar

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Family, Self, and Human Development across Cultures: Theory and Applications, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007).Google Scholar

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. and Ataca, B., “Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey,”Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (2005), 317–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kandiyoti, D., “Some social psychological dimensions of social change in a Turkish village,”British Journal of Sociology, 15 (1974), 47–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim, U., Y.-S. Park, Y.-E. Kwon, and Koo, J., “Values of children, parent–child relationship, and social change in Korea: Indigenous, cultural, and psychological analysis,”Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (2005), 338–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Klaus, D., Nauck, B., and Klein, T., “Families and the value of children in Germany,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst Science, 2005), pp. 17–41.Google Scholar

Koç, I., “Timing of leaving home in Turkey and its relationship with other life course events,”The Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 23 (2002), 16–24.Google Scholar

Mishra, R., Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Albert, I., and Schwarz, B., “Background and empirical results,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst Science, 2005), pp. 143–70.Google Scholar

Starr, J., “The role of Turkish secular law in changing the lives of rural Muslim women, 1950–1970,”Law and Society Review, 23 (1989), 497–523.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sunar, D., “Changes in Turkish child rearing practices,” paper presented at the workshop on Individualism and Collectivism, Seoul, Korea, July 13–16, 1990.

Sunar, D., “Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family,” in Özdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and Dependence in Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective (Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2002), pp. 217–37.Google Scholar

Sunar, D. and Fişek, G., “Contemporary Turkish families,” in Roopnarine, J. L. and Gielen, U. (eds.), Families in Global Perspective (Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2005), pp. 169–83.Google Scholar

Timur, S., Family Structure in Turkey (Ankara: Hacettepe University Press, 1972).Google Scholar