Book contents
- The Persistence of Reciprocity in International Humanitarian Law
- The Persistence of Reciprocity in International Humanitarian Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Reciprocity and IHL Compliance
- 3 Reciprocity and the Updating of the Geneva Conventions
- 4 The Expectation of Reciprocity and the War in Vietnam
- 5 The Expectation of Reciprocity and the GWOT
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendices
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 October 2019
Book contents
- The Persistence of Reciprocity in International Humanitarian Law
- The Persistence of Reciprocity in International Humanitarian Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Reciprocity and IHL Compliance
- 3 Reciprocity and the Updating of the Geneva Conventions
- 4 The Expectation of Reciprocity and the War in Vietnam
- 5 The Expectation of Reciprocity and the GWOT
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendices
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Persistence of Reciprocity in International Humanitarian Law , pp. 191 - 207Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Aaron, Benjamin, Abbott, Kenneth, and Horner, Elizabeth Froehling et al. Letter to Honorable Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, 5 December 2001.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. “New Life for the Laws of War,” American Journal of International Law 75, no. 4 (October 1981): 764–83.Google Scholar
Aldrich, George H. “Some Reflections on the Origins of the 1977 Geneva Protocols.” In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.) Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984) 129–37.Google Scholar
Alexander, George L., and Bennett, Andrew Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Allain, Jean Slavery in International Law: Of Human Exploitation and Trafficking [in English] (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012).Google Scholar
American Bar Association Task Force on Terrorism and the Law. “Report and Recommendations on Military Commissions.” 4 January 2002.Google Scholar
Austin, John The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O. “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions,” World Politics 38, no. 1 (October 1985), 226–54.Google Scholar
Baer, Daniel “The Haspel Nomination and the Torture Question: What Her Confirmation Would Mean for Obama’s Delicate Bargain,” Foreign Affairs (12 April 2018).Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif “International Crimes: ‘Jus Cogens’ and ‘Obligatio Erga Omnes’,” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, no. 4 (1996), 63–74.Google Scholar
Beaver, Diane E. “Memorandum for Commander, Joint Task Force 170, Subject: Legal Brief on Proposed Counter-Resistance Strategies (11 October 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2005) 229–35.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London: Methuen, 1982).Google Scholar
Blocher, Joseph “Combatant Status Review Tribunals: Flawed Answers to the Wrong Question,” The Yale Law Journal 116, no. 3 (December 2006), 667–74.Google Scholar
Borch, Frederic L. III Judge Advocates in Combat: Army Lawyers in Military Operations from Vietnam to Haiti (Washington DC: Office of the Judge Advocate General and Center of Military History, 2001).Google Scholar
Borch, Frederic L. III Judge Advocates in Vietnam: Army Lawyers in Southeast Asia 1959–1975 (Fort Levenworth KS: US Army Command and General Staff College Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl Josef, and Solf, Waldemar A. New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruff, Harold H. Bad Advice: Bush’s Lawyers in the War on Terror (Lawrence KS: University Press of Kansas, 2009).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley “The Grotian Conception of International Society.” In Butterfield, H. and Wight, M. (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1966) 51–73.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. “Humane Treatment of Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees (7 February 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.), The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 134–35.Google Scholar
Bush, George W. “Military Order of November 13, 2001: Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War against Terror.” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.), The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 25–28.Google Scholar
Bybee, Jay S. “Application of Treaties and Laws to Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees (22 January 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.), The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 81–117.Google Scholar
Bybee, Jay S. “Memorandum for John Rizzo, Acting General Council for the Central Intelligence Agency, Interrogation of Al Qaeda Operative, (1 August 2002).” www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/legacy/2010/08/05/memo-bybee2002.pdf.Google Scholar
Bybee, Jay S. “Standards of Conduct for Interrogation under 18 U.S.C. §§2340-2340a (1 August 2002).” InGreenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.), The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 172–217.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Byers, Michael War Law: Understanding International Law and Armed Conflict (Vancouver BC: Douglas and McIntyre, 2005).Google Scholar
CalifanoJr, Joseph A. The Triumph and Tragedy of Lyndon Johnson (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991).Google Scholar
Carr, E. H. The Twenty Year’s Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2001).Google Scholar
Carrick, Don, De Lee, Nigel, and Robinson, Paul (eds.), Ethics Education in the Military (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2008).Google Scholar
Carvin, Stephanie Prisoners of America’s Wars: From the Early Republic to Guantanamo (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio “On the Current Trends Towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law,” European Journal of International Law 9, no. 1 (1998), 2–17.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler “On Compliance,” International Organization 47, no. 2 (1993), 175–205.Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane Collective Responsibility and Accountability under International Law (Ardsley NY: Transnational Publishers, 2007).Google Scholar
Darcy, Shane “The Evolution of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals,” Military Law Review 175 (2003), 184.Google Scholar
Daskal, Jennifer C. “The Geography of the Battlefield: A Framework for Detention and Targeting Outside the Hot Conflict Zone,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161, no. 5 (April 2013), 1165–234.Google Scholar
Davis, Morris “Unforgivable Behavior, Inadmissible Evidence,” New York Times, 17 February 2008.Google Scholar
Davis, Vernon E. The Long Road Home: US Prisoner of War Policy and Planning in Southeast Asia (Washington DC: Historical Office, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2000).Google Scholar
Dickinson, Laura A. “Military Lawyers on the Battlefield: An Empirical Account of International Law Compliance,” The American Journal of International Law 104, no. 1 (January 2010), 1–28.Google Scholar
Dixon, William J. “Democracy and the Management of International Conflict,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37, no. 1 (1993), 42–68.Google Scholar
Doty, Grant R. “The United States and the Development of the Laws of Land Warfare,” Military Law Review 156 (1998): 224.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N. “Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?” International Organization 50, no. 3 (1996): 379–406.Google Scholar
Drew, Dennis M. “Rolling Thunder 1965: Anatomy of a Failure.” Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base AL: Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, 1986.Google Scholar
Dunlavey, Michael E. “Counter-Resistance Strategies, (October 11, 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.), The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 225.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press), 1977.Google Scholar
Estreicher, Samuel “Privileging Asymmetric Warfare (Part Ii): The Proportionality Principle under International Humanitarian Law,” Chicago Journal of International Law 12, no. 1 (2011): 143.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes,” American Political Science Review 88, no. 3 (1994): 577–92.Google Scholar
Feith, Douglas J. “Law in the Service of Terror—the Strange Case of the Additional Protocol,” The National Interest 1, no. 1 (Fall 1985): 36–47.Google Scholar
Feith, Douglas J. “Protocol I: Moving Humanitarian Law Backwards,” Akron Law Review 19, no. 4 (1985): 531–35.Google Scholar
Fife, Robert “Trump Calls Trudeau ‘Dishonest and Weak’ Instructs U.S. Officials Not to Endorse G7 Communique.” Globe and Mail, 9 June 2018.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger Improving Compliance with International Law (Charlottesville VA: University Press of Virginia, 1981).Google Scholar
Foreign Relations of the United States. 1964–1968, Vol. III, Vietnam, June-December 1965. Edited by Humphrey, David C., Keefer, Edward C. and Smith, Louis J. (Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1991).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. Fairness in International Law and Institutions (New York: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. “Legitimacy in the International System,” The American Journal of International Law 82, no. 4 (1988): 705–59.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Friedman, Leon (ed.) The Law of War: A Documentary History. 2 vols., vol. 2. (New York: Random House, 1972).Google Scholar
Garratt, David “The Role of Legal Advisors in the Armed Forces.” In Rowe, Peter (ed.) The Gulf War 1990–91 in International and English Law (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
Gebhardt, James F. “The Road to Abu Ghraib: US Army Detainee Doctrine and Experience.” Global War on Terrorism Occasional Paper 6 (2005).Google Scholar
Gellman, Barton, and Becker, Jo “A Different Understanding with the President.” The Washington Post, 24 June 2007.Google Scholar
“The Geneva Convention and the Treatment of Prisoners of War in Vietnam,” Harvard Law Review 80, no. 4 (February 1967): 851–68.Google Scholar
Gillman, Maj Andrew (USAF), and Johnson, Maj William (eds). Operational Law Handbook 2012 (Charlottesville VA: The Judge Advocate General and Legal Center & School, US Army, 2012).Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert War and Change in World Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L. “Review of Harold Hongju Koh, the Trump Adminisrtation and International Law,” American Journal of International Law (28 January 2019).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Mercer, Shannon “International Law and Institutions in the Trump Era,” German Yearbook of International Law (28 January 2019).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A. The Limits of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gomma, Mohammed M. Suspension or Termination of Treaties on Grounds of Breach (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).Google Scholar
Gonzales, Alberto “Memorandum for the President. Decision Re: Application of the Geneva Conventions on Prisoners of War to the Conflict with Al Qaeda and the Taliban (January 28, 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Graib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gravel, Mike The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Department History of United States Decisionmaking on Vietnam. vol. 3 (Boston: Beacon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Linda “Over Guantánamo, Justices Come under Election-Year Spotlight.” New York Times, 14 June 2008, A 10.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher “The Twilight of the Law of Belligerent Reprisals,” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 20, no. 1 (1989): 35.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42, no. 3 (1988): 485–507.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo On the Law of War and Peace. trans. Francis Kelsey (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. “A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law,” California Law Review 90, no. 6 (2002): 1823–87.Google Scholar
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld 548 US 557 (2006).Google Scholar
“Hanoi Said to Hint Trial of Americans,” New York Times, 12 February 1966.Google Scholar
HaynesII, William J. “Action Memo for Secretary of Defence, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques (27 November 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 237.Google Scholar
HaynesII, William J. “Memorandum for the General Counsel of the Department of the Air Force (17 January 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
“Hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on the Future of Military Commissions” www.c-span.org/video/?193667–1/future-military-commissions.Google Scholar
Committee on Armed Services Hearing to Receive Testimony on Legal Issues Regarding Military Commissions and the Trial of Detainees for Violations of the Law of War, 111th Cong., 1st sess., 7 July 2009.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie “Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication,” Yale Law Journal 107, no. 2 (1997): 273–391.Google Scholar
Helms, Jesse “American Sovereignty and the UN,” The National Interest 62 (Winter 2000): 31–34.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, Doswald-Beck, Louise, and Alvermann, Carolin (eds.) Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume 1, Rules. 2 vols., vol. 1 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Hermes, Walter G. Truce Tent and Fighting Front (Washington DC: Center of Military History, US Army, 1992).Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Nelson, Michael “Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism,” Political Science and Politics 36, no. 1 (2003): 37–42.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael “Constraints on Warfare.” In Howard, M., Andreaopoulous, G. and Shulman, M. (eds.)The Laws of War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994) 1–11.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. Who Are We?: The Challenges to America’s National Identity (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004).Google Scholar
ICRC Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: Report on the Work of the Conference (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1971).Google Scholar
ICRC Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: Report on the Work of the Confernce. vol. I (Geneva: ICRC, 1972).Google Scholar
ICRC Draft Revised or New Conventions for the Protection of War Victims (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1948).Google Scholar
ICRC Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949. 3 vols., vol. 1, (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1950).Google Scholar
ICRC Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949 3 vols., vol. 2-B (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1950).Google Scholar
ICRC Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949 3 vols., vol. 2-A (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1950).Google Scholar
ICRC “India and Pakistan – Viet Nam – Yemen,” International Review of the Red Cross 5, no. 57 (December 1965): 636–38.Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 7 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 14 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 5 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 8 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 6 (Bern: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 1 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 10 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Devlopment of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva 1974–1977 17 vols., vol. 6 (Berne: Federal Political Department, 1978).Google Scholar
ICRC Remarks and Proposals Submitted by the International Committee of the Red Cross (Geneva: International Committeee of the Red Cross, 1949).Google Scholar
ICRC Report on the Work of the Conference of Government Experts for the Study of the Conventions for the Protection of War Victims (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1947).Google Scholar
ICRC “Respect for the Rules of Humanity in Viet Nam,” International Review of the Red Cross 5, no. 53 (August 1965): 417–18.Google Scholar
ICRC “Response to the Icrc Appeal for the Respect to Be Given the Rules of Humanity in Viet Nam,” International Review of the Red Cross 5, no. 55 (October 1965): 527–28.Google Scholar
ICRC “Responses to the Icrc’s Appeal to Have the Rules of Humanity Respected in Viet Nam,” International Review of the Red Cross 5, no. 54 (September 1965): 477–78.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs 94, no. 1 (2018): 7–23.Google Scholar
“Interrogations” Washington Post, 21 January 1968.Google Scholar
Jinks, Derek. “The Applicability of the Geneva Conventions to the Global War on Terrorism,” Virgina Journal of Intrenational Law 46, no. 1 (2005–2006): 165–95.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Kahl, Colin H. “In the Crossfire or the Crosshairs? Norms, Civilian Casualties, and US Conduct in Iraq,” International Security 32, no. 1 (2007): 7–46.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits. “The Undertaking to Respect and Ensure Respect in All Circumstances: From Tiny Seed to Ripening Fruit,” Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2 (1999): 3.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, and Zegveld, Liesbeth. Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law 4th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Keeva, Steven. “Lawyers in the War Room,” American Bar Association Journal 77, no. 12 (December 1991): 52–59.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. “Reciprocity in International Relations,” International Organization 40, no. 1 (1989): 1–27.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. The World in Depression 1929–1939 rev ed. (Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. “How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced,” Indiana Law Journal 74, no. 4 (1998): 1397–417.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju “Jefferson Memorial Lecture-Transnational Legal Process after September 11th,” Berkeley Journal of International Law 22, no. 3 (2004): 337–54.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju The Trump Administration and International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?” The Yale Law Journal 106 (1997): 2599–659.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier,” World politics 43, no. 3 (1991): 336–66.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. Norms, Rules and Decisions: On the Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Kwakwa, Edward “Belligerent Reprisals in the Law of Armed Conflict,” Stanford Journal of International Law 27 (1990): 49.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch “The Limits of the Operation of the Law of War,” British Yearbook of International Law 30 (1953): 206–43.Google Scholar
Levie, Howard S., (ed.) Documents on Prisoners of War, International Law Studies, vol. 60 (Newport RI: Naval War College Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael W. “Drones and the Boundaries of the Battlefield,” Texas Intrernational Law Journal 47 (2012): 293–314.Google Scholar
Lohr, Michael “Memorandum for General Counsel of the Air Force, Subject: Working Group Recommendations Relating to Interrogation of Detainees, 6 February 2003.” In Greenberg, Karen J (ed.) The Torture Debate in America(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 382.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, S. P. “The Treatment of Prisoners of War in World War II,” The Journal of Modern History 66, no. 3 (1994): 487.Google Scholar
Mann, Robert A Grand Delusion: America’s Descent into Vietnam (New York: Basic Books, 2001).Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni “The Political Origins of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols of 1977.” In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.) Do the Geneva Conventions Matter? (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 943–69.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organization Basis of Politics (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. “Interests, Power, and Multilateralism,” International Organization 46, no. 4 (1992): 765–92.Google Scholar
Matheson, Michael J. “The United States Position on the Relation of Customary International Law to the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions,” American University Journal of International Law and Policy 2 (Fall 1987): 419–31.Google Scholar
Mayer, Jane The Dark Side: The inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Doubleday, 2008).Google Scholar
Mazzetti, Mark, and Savage, Charlie “Leaked Draft of Executive Order Could Revive C.I.A. Prisons.” New York Times, 25 January 2017.Google Scholar
McCain, John “Respecting the Geneva Conventions.” In Roth, Kenneth, Worden, Minky and Bernstein, Amy D. (eds.) Torture: Does It Make Us Safer? Is It Ever Ok?: A Human Rights Perspective (New York: The New Press, 2005) 155–57.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Abraham “How Far Americans Would Go to Fight Terror.” The Christian Science Monitor, 14 November 2001.Google Scholar
Meeker, Leonard C. “The Legality of US Participation in the Defense of Viet-Nam,” Department of State Bulletin 54 (1966): 474–88.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law,” American Journal of International Law 94, no. 2 (2000): 239.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor The Humanization of International Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006).Google Scholar
Military Assistance Command Vietnam Command History, 1965 (San Francisco CA: Historical Branch Office of the Secretart, Joint Staff, MACV, 1965).Google Scholar
Military Assistance Command Vietnam “Directive No. 381–46, Military Intelligence: Combined Screening of Detainees 12 December 1967.” In Levie, Howard S. (ed.) Documents on Prisoners of War (Naval War College, New Port RI: Naval War College Press, 1979) 748–51.Google Scholar
Military Assistance Command Vietnam “Directive Number 190–3 Military Police: Enemy Prisoners of War.” 24 May 1966.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Andrew D. “Does One Illegality Merit Another–the Law of Belligerent Reprisals in International Law,” Military Law Review 170 (2001): 155–77.Google Scholar
Mofidi, Manooher, and Eckert, Amy E. “Unlawful Combatants or Prisoners of War: The Law and Politics of Labels,” Cornell International Law Journal 36, no. 1 (Spring 2003): 59–92.Google Scholar
Mora, Alberto “Ginal Haspel Is a Torturer. What Else Does the Senate Need to Know?” Politico, 15 March 2018.Google Scholar
Mora, Alberto “Memorandum for Inspector General, Department of the Navy. Subj: Statement for the Record: Office of General Counsel Involvement in Interrogation Issues (7 July 2004),” http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/torturingdemocracy/documents/20040707–1.pdf.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51, no. 4 (1997): 513–53.Google Scholar
Morris, Justin “Law, Politics, and the Use of Force.” In Baylis, J., Wirtz, J. and Gray, C. (eds.) Strategy in the Contemporary World edited by Baylis, J., Wirtz, J. and Gray, C. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) 104–23.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. “The Institutional Features of the Prisoners of War Treaties,” International Organization 55, no. 4 (Autumn 2001): 971–91.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. Order within Anarchy: The Law of War as an International Institution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. “When Do States Follow the Laws of War?” American Political Science Review 101, no. 3 (August 2007): 559–72.Google Scholar
Mowery, E., Hutchins, C., and Rowland, B.. The Historical Management of Pow’s: A Synopsis of the 1968 US Army Provost Marshal General’s Study Entitled ‘a Review of United States Policy on Treatment of Prisoners of War’ (San Diego: Navel Health Research Center, 1975).Google Scholar
Myers, Richard Eyes on the Horizon: Serving on the Front Lines of National Security (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2009).Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. War and the Law of Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times Editorial Board. “A Dangerous New Order.” New York Times, 19 October 2006.Google Scholar
Nicaragua Case (Merits), ICJ Reports 14 (1986).Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Elle. “Combatants and the Combat Zone,” University of Richmond Law Review 43 (2009): 845–64.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger “The Grave Breaches Regime and Universal Jurisdiction,” Journal of International Criminal Justice 7, no. 4 (2009): 811–31.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Jens David The Assault on International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Orend, Brian “Michael Walzer on Resorting to Force,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 33, no. 3 (September 2000): 523–47.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.” In Oye, Kenneth A. (ed.) Cooperation under Anarchy (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986) 1–24.Google Scholar
Padmanabhan, Vijay M. “Legacy of 9/11: Continuing the Humanization of Humanitarian Law.” In Michael Schmitt, N. and Arimatsu, Louise (eds.) Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2011 – Volume 14 (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2012) 419–30.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert R. “Frederick the Great, Guibert, Bülow: From Dynastic to National War.” In Paret, Peter (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age 91–119 (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Parks, W. Hays “The Gulf War: A Practitioner’s View,” Dickinson Journal of International Law 10, no. 3 (Spring 1992): 393–423.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, James P. “The Contemporary Presidency: Decision Making in the Bush White House,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39, no. 2 (June 2009): 363–84.Google Scholar
Phifer, Jerald “Request for Approval of Counter-Resistance Techniques.” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2005) 227–28.Google Scholar
Philbin, Patrick F. “Memorandum Opinion for the Counsel to the President: Legality of the Use of Military Commissions to Try Terrorists (6 November 2001).” http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/torturingdemocracy/documents/20011106.pdf.Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean S., ed. Commentary: Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in the Armed Forces in the Field. 4 vols., vol. 1 (Geneva: ICRC, 1952).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean S. ed. Commentary: Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea. 4 vols., vol. 2 (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1960).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean S. ed. Commentary: Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Geneva: ICRC, 1960).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean S. ed. Commentary: Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War IV vols., vol. IV (Geneva: ICRC, 1958).Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. “The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony: Trump’s Surprsing Grand Strategy,” Foreign Affairs 97, no. 2 (2018): 20–27.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. “Apply the Golden Rule to Al Qaeda.” Wall Street Journal, 15 July 2006.Google Scholar
Powell, Colin “Memorandum to the Counsel to the President and Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs: Draft Decision Memorandum for the President on the Applicability of the Geneva Convention to the Conflict in Afghanistan (26 January 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 122–25.Google Scholar
“Powell Urges Pow Status,” Washington Times, 26 January 2002.Google Scholar
Price, Richard “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo,” International Organization 49, no. 1 (1995): 73–103.Google Scholar
Price, Richard “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52, no. 3 (1998): 613–44.Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Kupreskic. International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991, (14 January 2000).Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Milan Martić, 108 ILR 39 (1996).Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić, 105 ILR 419 (1996).Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić: Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Juristiction, ILM 35 (1995).Google Scholar
Prugh, George S. Law at War: Vietnam 1964–1978 (Washington DC: Department of the Army, 1978).Google Scholar
Puls, Keith E. (ed.) Law of War Handbook (Charlottesville, VA: International and Operational Law Department, Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, US Army, 2005).Google Scholar
Rabkin, Jeremy A. Law without Nations?: Why Constitutional Government Requires Sovereign States (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ralph, Jason America’s War on Terror: The State of the 9/11 Exception from Bush to Obama (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Reagan, Ronald “Letter of Transmittal,” American Journal of International Law 81, no. 4 (October 1987): 910–12.Google Scholar
“Report by the J-5 to the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Jcs Review of the 1977 Protocols Additional to the 1949 Geneva Conventions.” 13 September 1982.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian “Politics and International Legal Obligation,” European Journal of International Relations 9, no. 4 (2003): 591–625.Google Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Years in Washington (New York: Crown Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar
Rives, Jack L. “Memorandum for Sap/Gc, Subject: Comment on Draft Report and Recommendations of the Working Group to Assess the Legal, Policy and Operational Issues Relating to Interrogation of Detainees Held by the U.S. Armed Forces in the War on Terrorism, (6 February 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. (ed.) The Torture Debate in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 379–81.Google Scholar
Rives, Jack L. “Memorandum for Sap/Gc, Subject: Final Report and Recommendations of the Working Group to Assess the Legal, Policy and Operational Issues Relating to Interrogation of Detainees Held by the U.S. Armed Forces in the War on Terrorism (5 February 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. (ed.) The Torture Debate in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) 377–78.Google Scholar
Rivkin, David B., Casey, Lee A., and Bartram, Darin R. “Bringing Al-Qaeda to Justice: The Constitutionality of Trying Al-Qaeda Terrorists in the Military Justice System.” The Heritage Foundation, Legal Memorandum #3 (5 November 2001).Google Scholar
Roberts, Adam, and Guelff, Richard (eds.) Documents on the Laws of War 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Romig, Thomas. “Memorandum for General Counsel of the Department of the Air Force, Subject: Draft Report and Recommendations of the Working Group to Ace’s the Legal, Policy and Operational Issues Related to Interrogation of Detainees Held by the U.S. Armed Forces in the War on Terrorism (3 March 2003).” In The Torture Debate in America, edited by Greenberg, Karen J, 386–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rondeau, Sophie. “The Pragmatic Value of Reciprocity: Promoting Respect for International Humanitarian Law among Non-State Actors.” In Perrin, Benjamin (ed.) Modern Warfare: Armed Groups, Private Militaries, Humanitarian Organizations, and the Law (Vancouver BC: UBC Press, 2012) 43–72.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Daniel J., and Schulman, Loren DeJonge “Trump’s Secret War on Terror.” The Atlantic, 10 August 2018.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Gunther Erich The Art of Warfare in the Age of Napoleon (Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques The Basic Political Writings trans. Cress, Donald A., 2nd ed. (Indianapolis IN: Hackett Publishing, 2011).Google Scholar
Rumsfeld, Donald “Memorandum for Commander Ussouthcom, Subject: Counter-Resistance Techniques (15 January 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 239.Google Scholar
Rumsfeld, Donald. “Memorandum for the General Counsel of the Department of Defence, Subject: Detainees Interrogations (15 January 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 238.Google Scholar
Sandkuhler, Kevin M. “Memorandum for General Counsel of the Air Force, Subj: Working Group Recommendations on Detainee Interrogations (27 February 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. (ed.) The Torture Debate in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006) 383.Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmerman, Bruno (eds.) Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987).Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe Lawless World: The Whistle-Blowing Account of How Bush and Blair Are Taking the Law into Their Own Hands (London: Penguin UK, 2006).Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe Torture Team: Rumsfeld’s Memo and the Betrayal of American Values 1st ed. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar
Savage, Charlie Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy (New York: Little Brown and Company, 2007).Google Scholar
Schindler, Dietrich, and Toman, Jiri (eds.) The Laws of Armed Conflict: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions, and Other Documents 2nd ed. (Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1981).Google Scholar
Scott, James B. The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: The Conference of 1899 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1920).Google Scholar
Shalikashvili, John. “Letter to Senate Armed Services Committee (12 September 2006).” www.humanrightsfirst.info/wp-content/uploads/pdf/06913-etn-military-let-ca3.pdf.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy Stoic Warriors: The Ancient Philosophy Behind the Military Mind (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Alvarez, Jose E. “A Liberal Theory of International Law,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 94 (2000): 240–53.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter J. “The New Sovereigntists: American Exceptionalism and Its False Profits,” Foreign Affairs 79, no. 6 (2000): 9–15.Google Scholar
Sutter, Philip “The Continuing Role for Belligerent Reprisals,” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13, no. 1 (2008): 93–122.Google Scholar
Taft, IV, William, H. “Comments on Your Paper on the Geneva Convention (2 February, 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Grhaib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 129–33.Google Scholar
Taft, IV, William, H. “Your Draft Memorandum of January 9 (11 January 2002)” http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/torturingdemocracy/documents/20020111.pdf.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina “Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo,” International Security 29, no. 4 (2005): 5–49.Google Scholar
Teson, Fernando R. “The Kantian Theory of International Law,” Columbia Law Review 92, no. 1 (1992): 53–102.Google Scholar
United Nations Documents of the Conference Official Records of the United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties (New York: United Nations, 1971).Google Scholar
United Nations Summary Records of the Plenary Meetings and of the Meetings of the Committee of the Whole: First Session. Official Records of the United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties (New York: United Nations, 1971).Google Scholar
United Nations Summary Records of the Plenary Meetings and of the Meetings of the Committee of the Whole: Second Session. Official Records of the United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties (New York: United Nations, 1971).Google Scholar
United Nations International Law Commission Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Its Thirty-Second Session. Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1980. Vol. 2, Part 2 (New York: United Nations, 1981).Google Scholar
United States Army Field Manual 19–40 Enemy Prisoners of War and Civilian Internees, 3 November 1952 (Washington DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1952).Google Scholar
United States Army Field Manual 27–10 the Law of Land Warfare, 18 July 1956 (Washington DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1956).Google Scholar
United States Army Field Manual 30–15 Intelligence Interrogations, 7 March 1969 (Washington DC: Department of the Army, 1969).Google Scholar
United States Army The Law of Land Warfare. Army Field Manual 27–10, 15 July 1976 (Washington DC: US Department of the Army, 1976).Google Scholar
United States Department of Defence. “Working Group Report on Detainess Interrogations in the Global War on Terrorism: Assessment of the Legal, Historical, Policy, and Operational Considerations (4 April 2003).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 286–359.Google Scholar
United States v. Von Leeb, Law Reports of the Trials of War Criminals (1948).Google Scholar
US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations “Geneva Conventions for the Protection of War Victims: Hearings on Executives D, E, F, and G” (Washington DC: General Printing Office, 1955).Google Scholar
US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations “Report on Geneva Conventions for the Protection of War Victims: Executives D, E, F, and G” (Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1955).Google Scholar
Washington Post Editorial Board “Humanity to Prisoners.” The Washington Post, 6 December 1965.Google Scholar
Watts, Sean “Reciprocity and the Law of War,” Harvard International Law Journal 50, no. 2 (2009): 365–434.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth “The Rules of War Can’t Protect Al Qaida.” New York Times, 31 December 2001, A 11.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Wilson, Heather A. International Law and the Use of Force by National Liberation Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Windsor, Philip Strategic Thinking: An Introduction and Farewell (Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002).Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Ben “Trump Outpacing Obama in Drone Strikes; 80 in First Year: Report,” The Washington Times, 7 June 2018.Google Scholar
Yoo, John C. War by Other Means: An Insider’s Account of the War on Terror (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Yoo, John C., and Delahunty, Robert J.. “Draft Memorandum for William J. Haynes II, General Counsel, Department of Defence Re: Application of Treaties and Laws to Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees (January 9, 2002).” In Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L. (eds.) The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 38–79.Google Scholar
Yoo, John C., and Ho, James C. “The Status of Terrorists,” Virgina Jounal of International Law 44, no. 1 (2003–2004): 207–28.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Applications (Baltimore MD: Published for Resources for the Future by the John Hopkins University Press, 1979).Google Scholar