Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:25:45.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2024

Edited by
Omar F. Miranda  and
Kate Singer
Omar F. Miranda
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco
Kate Singer
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Percy Shelley for Our Times , pp. 276 - 285
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Abbey, Lloyd. Destroyer and Preserver: Shelley’s Poetic Skepticism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Abdel-Hai, M. “Shelley and the Arabs: An Essay in Comparative Literature.” Journal of Arabic Literature 3 (1972), 72–89.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Abrams, M. H. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1973.Google Scholar
Alexander, Meena. “Shelley’s India: Territory and Text, Some Problems of Decolonization.” In Shelley: Poet and Legislator of the World, eds. Bennett, Betty T. and Curran, Stuart, 169–178. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
An, Young-Ok. “Beatrice’s Gaze Revisited: Anatomizing ‘The Cenci.’” Criticism 38.1 (1996), 27–68.Google Scholar
Aveling, Edward B. and Marx Aveling, Eleanor. Shelley’s Socialism. Journeyman Chapbook: No. 3. London: Journeyman Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Barnett, Suzanne L. Romantic Paganism: The Politics of Ecstasy in the Shelley Circle. New York: Palgrave, 2017.Google Scholar
Behrendt, Stephen C. “Beatrice Cenci and the Tragic Myth of History.” In History and Myth: Essays on English Romantic Literature, ed. Behrendt, Stephen C., 214–234. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bennett, Betty T. and Curran, Stuart, eds. Shelley: Poet and Legislator of the World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bewell, Alan. Romanticism and Colonial Disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bieri, James. Percy Bysshe Shelley: A Biography: Youth’s Unextinguished Fire, 1792–1816. Danvers: Rosemont Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Binfield, Kevin. “‘May They Be Divided Never’: Ethics, History, and the Rhetorical Imagination in Shelley’s ‘The Coliseum’.” Keats-Shelley Journal 46 (1997), 124–147.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. Shelley’s Mythmaking. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. Poets and Poems. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar
Bonca, Teddi Chichester, Shelley’s Mirrors of Love: Narcissism, Sacrifice, and Sorority. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Borushko, Matthew, “Violence and Nonviolence in Shelley’s ‘Mask of Anarchy.’” Keats-Shelley Journal 59 (2010), 96–113.Google Scholar
Borushko, Matthew, ed. The Politics of Shelley: History, Theory, Form. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (October 2015). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/shelley_politics.Google Scholar
Bowers, Will and Mathelinda, Nabogodi, eds. Reading Shelley on the Bicentenary of his Death. European Romantic Review 33.5 (2022), 609–757.Google Scholar
Brigham, Linda. “The Postmodern Semiotics of Prometheus Unbound.” Studies in Romanticism 33.1 (1994), 31–56.Google Scholar
Brookshire, David, ed. Percy Shelley and the Delimitation of the Gothic. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (October 2015). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/gothic_shelley.Google Scholar
Brown, Nathaniel. Sexuality and Feminism in Shelley. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Bundock, Chris. “Historicism, Temporalization, and Romantic Prophecy in Percy Shelley’s Hellas.” In Rethinking British Romantic History, 1770–1845, eds. Fermanis, Porscha and Regan, John, 144–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Madeleine. Eternity in British Romantic Poetry. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Madeleine. Shelley’s Living Artistry: Letters, Poems, Plays. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Madeleine. The Poet-Hero in the Work of Byron and Shelley. London: Anthem Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth Neil. The Young Shelley: Genesis of a Radical. New York: Macmillan, 1950.Google Scholar
Camoglu, Arif. “White Revolutionary Subjecthood in Percy B. Shelley’s Laon and Cythna.” Essays in Romanticism 30.2 (October 2023), 187–199.Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A. England’s First Family of Writers: Mary Wollstonecraft, William Godwin, Mary Shelley. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Carlson, Julie A. “Like Love: The Feel of Shelley’s Similes.” In Romanticism and the Emotions, eds. Faflak, Joel and Sha, Richard C., 76–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Carman, Colin. “‘Freedom Leads It Forth’: Queering the Epithalamium in Prometheus Unbound.” European Romantic Review 24.5 (2013), 579–602.Google Scholar
Carman, Colin. The Radical Ecology of the Shelleys: Eros and Environment. New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Chander, Harish. “Thematic Affinities in Shelley and Tagore.” South Asian Review 27.2 (2006), 48–71.Google Scholar
Chander, Manu Samriti. “Framing Difference: The Orientalist Aesthetics of David Roberts and Percy Shelley.” Keats-Shelley Journal 60 (2011), 77–94.Google Scholar
Chandler, James. England in 1819: The Politics of Literary Culture and the Case of Romantic Historicism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Clark, Timothy. Embodying Revolution: The Figure of the Poet in Shelley. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clark, Timothy and Hogle, Jerrold E., eds. Evaluating Shelley. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Coffey, Bysshe Inigo. Shelley’s Broken World: Fractured Materiality and Intermitted Song. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Cohen-Vrignaud, Gerard. Radical Orientalism: Rights, Reform, and Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Colbert, Benjamin. “Romantic Palingenesis, or History from the Ashes.” European Romantic Review 28.3 (2017), 369–378.Google Scholar
Collings, David. Disastrous Subjectivities: Romanticism, Modernity, and the Real. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Cox, Jeffrey. Romanticism in the Shadow of War: Literary Culture in the Napoleonic Wars Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Crompton, Louis. Byron and Greek Love: Homophobia in Nineteenth Century England. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Crook, Nora and Guiton, Derek. Shelley’s Venomed Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart. Poetic Form and British Romanticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart. “Romanticism Displaced and Placeless.” European Romantic Review 20.5 (2009), 637–650.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart. Shelley’s Annus Mirabilis: The Maturing of an Epic Vision. San Marino: Huntington Library, 1975.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart. Shelley’s Cenci: Scorpions Ringed with Fire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Curran, Stuart. “The Political Prometheus.” Studies in Romanticism 25.3 (1986), 429–455.Google Scholar
Davis, Amanda Blake. “Androgyny as Mental Revolution in Act 4 of Prometheus Unbound.” The Keats-Shelley Review 34.2 (2020), 160–177.Google Scholar
Dawson, P. M. S. The Unacknowledged Legislator: Shelley and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. The Rhetoric of Romanticism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Demson, Michael. “‘Let a Great Assembly Be’: Percy Shelley’s ‘The Mask of Anarchy’ and the Organization of Labor in New York City, 1910–30.” European Romantic Review 22.5 (2011), 641–655.Google Scholar
Demson, Michael. Masks of Anarchy: The History of a Radical Poem from Percy Shelley to the Triangle Factory Fire. Brooklyn: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Dick, Alex J. “‘The Ghost of Gold’: Forgery Trials and the Standard of Value in Shelley’s The Mask of Anarchy.” European Romantic Review 18.3 (2007), 381–400.Google Scholar
Donohue, Joseph W., Jr. “Shelley’s Beatrice and the Romantic Concept of Tragic Character.” Keats-Shelley Journal 17 (1968), 53–73.Google Scholar
Drew, John. India and the Romantic Imagination. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Duff, David. Romance and Revolution: Shelley and the Politics of a Genre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Duffy, Cian. Shelley and the Revolutionary Sublime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Eeckhout, Bart. “Roaming through World Literature: Shelley’s Wind, Stevens’s Blackbird, Coetzee’s Hugo Claus, and the Desire for Poetic Transformation.” Wallace Stevens Journal 46.2 (2022), 215–234.Google Scholar
Ellermann, Greg. “Red Shelley, Once Again.” Keats-Shelley Journal 68 (2019), 104–105.Google Scholar
Endo, Paul. “The Cenci: Recognizing the Shelleyan Sublime.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 38.3/4 (1996), 379–397.Google Scholar
Erkelenz, Michael. “Inspecting the Tragedy of Empire: Shelley’s Hellas and Aeschylus’ Persians.” Philological Quarterly 76.3 (1997), 313–337.Google Scholar
Everest, Kelvin. Keats and Shelley: Winds of Light. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Everest, Kevin, ed. Shelley Revalued: Essays from the Gregynog Conference. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Faflak, Joel. “Dancing in the Dark with Shelley.” In Constellations of a Contemporary Romanticism, eds. Khalip, Jacques and Pyle, Forest, 167–185. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Faflak, Joel. “The Difficult Education of Shelley’s The Triumph of Life.” Keats-Shelley Journal 58 (2009), 53–78.Google Scholar
Faflak, Joel, ed. The Futures of Shelley’s Triumph of Life. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (October 2019). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/triumph.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Mary. “Peterloo at 200: The Radical Press, Simultaneous Meetings and The Mask of Anarchy.” The Keats-Shelley Review 33.2 (2019), 159–174.Google Scholar
Ferriss, Suzanne. “Percy Bysshe Shelley’s The Cenci and the Rhetoric of Tyranny.” In British Romantic Drama: Historical and Critical Essays, eds. Hoagwood, Terence Allan and Watkins, Daniel P., 208–228. London: Associated University Presses, 1998.Google Scholar
Foot, Paul. Red Shelley. London: Sidgwick and Johnson with Michael Dempsey, 1980.Google Scholar
Foot, Paul. Shelley’s Revolutionary Year. London: Redwords, 1990.Google Scholar
Fraistat, Neil. “Illegitimate Shelley: Radical Piracy and the Textual Edition as Cultural Performance.” PMLA 109.3 (1994), 409–423.Google Scholar
Fraistat, Neil. The Poem and the Book: Interpreting Collections of Romantic Poetry. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Franta, Andrew. “Shelley and the Poetics of Political Indirection.” Poetics Today 22.4 (Winter 2001), 765–793.Google Scholar
Freer, Alexander. “A Genealogy of Narcissism.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 74.1 (June 2019), 1–29.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Amanda Jo. Sweet Science: Romantic Materialism and the New Logics of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Goslee, Nancy. “Shelley’s Greek ‘Discourse’: Ancient Manners and Modern Liberty.” The Wordsworth Circle 36.1 (Winter 2005), 2–5.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Paul. Percy Bysshe Shelley. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian. “The Sounds of Peterloo.” In Commemorating Peterloo: Violence, Resilience and Claim-Making during the Romantic Era, eds. Demson, Michael and Hewitt, Regina, 57–83. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Henderson, Graham. The Real Percy Bysshe Shelley. December 15, 2023. www.grahamhenderson.ca.Google Scholar
Hickman, Jared. Black Prometheus: Race and Radicalism in the Age of Atlantic Slavery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hoagwood, Terence Alan. Skepticism & Ideology: Shelley’s Political Prose and Its Philosophical Context from Bacon to Marx. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hodgson, John A. “The World’s Mysterious Doom: Shelley’s The Triumph of Life.” ELH 42.4 (1975), 595–622.Google Scholar
Hogle, Jerrold E. Shelley’s Process: Radical Transference and the Development of His Major Works. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Holmes, Richard. Shelley: The Pursuit, 2nd ed. New York: Harper Perennial, 2005.Google Scholar
Igarashi, Yohei. The Connected Condition: Romanticism and the Dream of Communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Igarashi, Yohei. “Shelley Amid the Age of Separations: Romantic Sociology and Romantic Media Theory.” In Multi-Media Romanticisms, ed. Burkett, Andrew. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (November 2016). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/multi-media/praxis.2016.multi-media.igarashi.html.Google Scholar
Jager, Colin. “Shelley After Atheism.” Studies in Romanticism 49.4 (2010), 611–631.Google Scholar
Jager, Colin. “Transitional Justice in Prometheus Unbound.” The Workshop 4 (2016), 26–31.Google Scholar
Jager, Colin. Unquiet Things: Secularism in the Romantic Age. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Owen. “In Pursuit of Percy Shelley, ‘The First Celebrity Vegan’: An Essay on Meat, Sex, and Broccoli.” Journal of Folklore Research 53.2 (2016), 1–30.Google Scholar
Kalim, M. Siddiq. The Social Orpheus: Shelley and the Owenites. Lahore: Government College, 1983.Google Scholar
Kantor, Jamison. “Percy Shelley, Political Machines, and the Prehistory of the Postliberal.” In British Literature and Technology, 1600–1830, eds. Girten, Kristin M., Halon, Aaron R., and Drury, Joseph, 139–163. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Keach, William. “Radical Shelley?” Raritan 5.2 (Fall 1985), 120–129.Google Scholar
Keach, William. “Rise Like Lions? Shelley and the Revolutionary Left.” International Socialism 2.75 (1997). www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj2/1997/isj2-075/keach.htm.Google Scholar
Keach, William. Shelley’s Style. London and New York: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar
Kim, Joey S. “Disorienting ‘Shapes’ in Shelley’s The Revolt of Islam.” The Keats-Shelley Review 32.2 (2018), 134–147.Google Scholar
Kipperman, Mark. “History and Ideality: The Politics of Shelley’s Hellas.” Studies in Romanticism 30.2 (1991), 147–168.Google Scholar
Kohler, Michael. “Shelley in Chancery: The Reimagination of the Paternalist State in ‘The Cenci.’” Studies in Romanticism 37.4 (1998), 545–589.Google Scholar
Kucich, Greg. Keats, Shelley, and Romantic Spenserianism. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press University, 1991.Google Scholar
Kuiken, Kir. Imagined Sovereignties: Toward a New Political Romanticism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Langan, Celeste and McLane, Maureen N.. “The Medium of Romantic Poetry.” In The Cambridge Companion to British Romantic Poetry, eds. Chandler, James and McLane, Maureen N., 239–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Leask, Nigel. British Romantic Writers and the East: Anxieties of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Lee, Debbie. Slavery and the Romantic Imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Eric. “Poetry Is Not a Luxury: Audre Lorde and Shelleyan Poetics.” In Romantic Poetics of Public Freedom, eds. Gurton-Wachter, Lily and Wolff, Tristram. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (December 2021). http://romantic-circles.org/praxis/publicfeeling/praxis.2021.publicfeeling.lindstrom.html.Google Scholar
Lussier, Mark S. Romantic Dharma: The Emergence of Buddhism into Nineteenth-Century Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
Lussier, Mark S. Romantic Dynamics: The Poetics of Physicality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar
Makdisi, Saree. Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Matthew, Patricia A., ed. Race, Blackness, and Romanticism. Studies in Romanticism 61.1 (2022), 1–181.Google Scholar
McGrath, Brian. “Shelley, among Other Things.” MLN 133.5 (December 2018), 1188–1205.Google Scholar
Mercer, Anna. The Collaborative Literary Relationship of Percy Bysshe Shelley and Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. London: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar
Michael, Timothy. British Romanticism and the Critique of Political Reason. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Miranda, Omar F. “Between Page and Stage: The Happy Medium of Romantic Drama.” In On the 200th Anniversary of Lord Byron’s Manfred, ed. Miranda, Omar F.. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (June 2019). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/manfred/praxis.2019.manfred.miranda.html.Google Scholar
Miranda, Omar F. “On Phoenix Wings: Lucille Clifton’s Romantic Renewals.” In Race, Blackness, and Romanticism, ed. Patricia Matthew. Studies in Romanticism 61.1 (2022), 125–135.Google Scholar
Miranda, Omar F. “Prometeo Desencadenado: The Afterlife of Percy Shelley’s Prometheus Unbound in the Americas.” In Latin American Afterlives, eds. Moy, Olivia Loksing and Rojas, Marco Ramírez. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (July 2020). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/latinam/praxis.2020.latinam.miranda.html.Google Scholar
Miranda, Omar F. “The Global Romantic Lyric,” The Wordsworth Circle 52.2 (June 2021), 308–327.Google Scholar
Mole, Tom. What the Victorians Made of Romanticism: Material Artifacts, Cultural Practices, and Reception History. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jen. “Uses of Shelley in Working-Class Culture: Approximations and Substitutions.” Key Words: A Journal of Cultural Materialism 13 (2015), 117–137.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy. Shelley and the Revolution in Taste: The Body and the Natural World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shelley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mushakavanhu, Tinashe. “Anarchies of the Mind: An Imagined Conversation Between Two Writers.” Wasafiri 27.4 (2012), 82–88.Google Scholar
Mulhallen, Jacqueline. Percy Bysshe Shelley: Poet and Revolutionary. London: Pluto Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Nabugodi, Mathelinda. Shelley with Benjamin: A Critical Mosaic. London: UCL Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Nabugodi, Mathelinda. “A Triumph of Black Life?” Keats-Shelley Journal 70 (2021), 133–141.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Anahid, ed. Laon and Cythna; Or, the Revolution of the Golden City. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Nersessian, Anahid. Utopia, Limited: Romanticism and Adjustment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Michael. The Human Mind’s Imaginings: Conflict and Achievement in Shelley’s Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Michael. Shelleyan Reimaginings and Influence: New Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Michael, Anthony, Howe, and Madeleine, Callaghan, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Percy Bysshe Shelley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Paley, Morton D. “Apocapolitics: Allusion and Structure in Shelley’s ‘Mask of Anarchy’.” Huntington Library Quarterly 54.2 (1991), 91–109.Google Scholar
Peterfreund, Stuart. Shelley among Others: The Play of The Intertext and The Idea of Language. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pulos, C. E. The Deep Truth: A Study of Shelley’s Skepticism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Pyle, Forest. Art’s Undoing: In the Wake of a Radical Aestheticism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pyle, Forest. “‘Frail Spells’: Shelley and the Ironies of Exile.” In Irony and Clerisy, ed. White, Deborah Elise. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (August 1999). https://romanticcircles.org/praxis/irony/pyle/frail.html.Google Scholar
Pyle, Forest. “Kindling and Ash: Radical Aestheticism in Keats and Shelley.” Studies in Romanticism 42.4 (December 2003), 427–459.Google Scholar
Pyle, Kai. “Ningaabii’an Negamotawag: Translating Shelley into Ojibwe.” Studies in Romanticism 61.4 (Winter 2002), 491–502.Google Scholar
Quillin, Jessica K. Shelley and the Musico-Poetics of Romanticism. Surrey and Burlington: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama. Dark Interpreter: The Discourse of Romanticism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Rajan, Tilottama. The Supplement of Reading: Figures of Understanding in Romantic Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Redfield, Marc. The Politics of Aesthetics: Nationalism, Gender, Romanticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Reno, Seth T. Amorous Aesthetics: Intellectual Love in Romantic Poetry and Poetics, 1788–1853. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Reno, Seth T. “The Violence of Form in Shelley’s ‘Mask of Anarchy’.” Keats-Shelley Journal 62 (2013), 80–98.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. A Mental Theater: Poetic Drama and Consciousness in the Romantic Age. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Rieger, James. The Mutiny Within: The Heresies of Percy Bysshe Shelley. New York: George Braziller, 1967.Google Scholar
Roberts, Hugh. Shelley and the Chaos of History: A New Politics of Poetry. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Roberts, Merrilees. “Prometheus Unbound: Reconstitutive Poetics and the Promethean Poet.” Keats-Shelley Review 34.2 (2020), 178–193.Google Scholar
Roberts, Merrilees. Shelley’s Poetics of Reticence: Shelley’s Shame. New York/London: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
Rohrbach, Emily. Modernity’s Mist: British Romanticism and the Poetics of Anticipation. New York: Fordham University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
“Romanticism and Pop Culture.” Romantic Circles. https://romantic-circles.org/lab/pop-culture.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Adam R. “Shelley and the Limits of Sustainability.” In Romantic Sustainability: Endurance and the Natural World, 1780–1830, ed. Robertson, Ben R., 233–244. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Rossington, Michael. “Theorizing a Republican Poetics: P. B. Shelley and Alfieri.” European Romantic Review 20.5 (2009), 619–628.Google Scholar
Rossington, Michael. “William Michael Rossetti and the Organization of P. B. Shelley in the Later Nineteenth Century.” European Romantic Review 26.3 (2015), 387–393.Google Scholar
Ruston, Sharon. Shelley and Vitality. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jonathan. “‘Yet the Capital of the World’: Rome, Repetition, and History in Shelley’s Later Writings.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 28.2 (June 2006), 105–126.Google Scholar
Schacht, Benjamin. “Freedom Songs: Socialist Multiculturalism and the Protest Lyric from Percy Shelley to Chaim Zhitlovsky.” The Gotham Center for New York City History (2021). www.gothamcenter.org/blog/freedom-songs-socialist-multiculturalism-and-the-protest-lyric-from-percy-shelley-to-chaim-zhitlovsky.Google Scholar
Schmid, Susanne and Rossington, Michael, eds. The Reception of P.B. Shelley in Europe. London: Bloomsbury, 2008.Google Scholar
Scott, Heidi. Chaos and Cosmos: Literary Roots of Modern Ecology in the British Nineteenth Century. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Michael. Radical Shelley: The Philosophical Anarchism and Utopian Thought of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Sha, Richard. Imagination and Science in Romanticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Sha, Richard. “The Uses and Abuses of Historicism: Halperin and Shelley on the Otherness of Ancient Greek Sexuality.” In Historicizing Romantic Sexuality, ed. Sha, Richard. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (January 2006). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/sexuality/sha/sha.html.Google Scholar
Shaaban, Bouthaina. “Shelley in the Chartist Press.” Keats-Shelley Memorial Bulletin 34 (1983), 41–60.Google Scholar
Shelley, Mary. “Preface and Notes to The Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley (1839).” In The Novels and Selected Works of Mary Shelley, Volume 2, eds. Crook, Nora, Clemit, Pamela, and Bennett, Betty T., 253–330. London: Pickering & Chatto, 1996.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Complete Poetry of Percy Bysshe Shelley, eds. Donald H. Reiman, Neil Fraistat, Nora Crook, et al. 4 volumes to date. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000–.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. Frederick L. Jones. 2 volumes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Poems of Shelley, eds. Geoffrey, Matthews, Kelvin, Everest, Cian, Duffy, Michael, Rossington, et al. 4 volumes to date. New York/London: Routledge, 1989–.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. E. B. Murray. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Shelley’s Poetry and Prose, Norton Critical Edition, 2nd Edition, eds. Donald, H. Reiman and Neil, Fraistat. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2002.Google Scholar
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Popular Songs: The Political Poems of 1819–1820. Seattle: Entre Ríos Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Shih, Terence H. W. “The Romantic Revival in Early China and Taiwan: Hsu Chih-Mo’s Poetics of Liberty.” In English Romanticism in East Asia, ed. Han, Suh-Reen. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (December 2016). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/eastasia.Google Scholar
Shih, Terence H. W. “The Romantic Skylark in Taiwanese Literature: Shelleyan Religious Skepticism in Xu Zhimo and Yang Mu.” In British Romanticism in Asia: The Reception, Translation, and Transformation of Romantic Literature in India and East Asia, eds. Watson, Alex and Williams, Laurence, 319–339. Singapore: Palgrave, 2019.Google Scholar
Singer, Kate. Romantic Vacancy: The Poetics of Gender, Affect, and Radical Speculation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Singer, Kate. “Stoned Shelley: Revolutionary Tactics and Women under the Influence.” Studies in Romanticism 48.4 (2009), 686–707.Google Scholar
Solomonescu, Yasmin. “Percy Shelley’s Revolutionary Periods.” ELH 83.4 (2016), 1105–1133.Google Scholar
Sperry, Stuart M. Shelley’s Major Verse: The Narrative and Dramatic Poetry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Stabler, Jane. The Artistry of Exile: Romantic and Victorian Writers in Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Steffan, Truman Guy. “Seven Accounts of the Cenci and Shelley’s Drama.” Studies in English Literature 9.4 (1969), 601–618.Google Scholar
Sun, Emily. On the Horizon of World Literature: Forms of Modernity in Romantic England and Republican China. New York: Fordham University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Sun, Emily. “Shelley’s Voice: Poetry, Internationalism, and Solidarity.” European Romantic Review 30.3 (2019), 239–247.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Rieko. The Shelleys and the Brownings: Textual Re-Imaginings and the Question of Influence. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Swann, Karen. The Lives of the Dead Poets: Keats, Shelley, Coleridge. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Swann, Karen. “Shelley’s Pod People.” In Romanticism and the Insistence of the Aesthetic, eds. Pyle, Forest and Redfield, Marc. Romantic Circles Praxis Series (February 2005). https://romantic-circles.org/praxis/aesthetic/swann/swann.html.Google Scholar
Swann, Mandy. “Shelley’s Utopian Seascapes.” Studies in Romanticism 52.3 (Fall 2013), 389–414.Google Scholar
Tetreault, Ronald. The Poetry of Life: Shelley and Literary Form. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Thurston, Norman. “Shelley and the Duty of Hope.” Keats-Shelley Journal 26 (1977), 22–28.Google Scholar
Ulmer, William. Shelleyan Eros: The Rhetoric of Romantic Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Verderame, Michael. ‘“We Are as Clouds’: Climate and Social Transformation in Shelley.” ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 28.1 (2021), 271–290.Google Scholar
Wang, Orrin N. C. Fantastic Modernity: Dialectical Readings in Romanticism and Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wang, Orrin N. C. Romantic Sobriety: Sensation, Revolution, Commodification, History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wang, Orrin N. C. Techno-Magism: Media, Mediation, and the Cut of Romanticism. New York: Fordham University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Warren, Andrew B. The Orient and the Young Romantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Warren, Andrew B. “‘Unentangled Intermixture’: Love and Materialism in Shelley’s ‘Epipsychidion’.” Keats-Shelley Journal 59 (2010), 78–95.Google Scholar
Washington, Chris. Romantic Revelations: Visions of Post-Apocalyptic Life and Hope in the Anthropocene. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Earl R. Shelley: A Critical Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Earl R. Shelley’s Prometheus Unbound: A Critical Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Webb, Timothy. Shelley: A Voice Not Understood. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Alan. “Freedom from the Stranglehold of Time: Shelley’s Visionary Conception in Queen Mab.” Romanticism 22.1 (2016), 90–106.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Alan. “‘The Ineffectual Angel’: Arnold’s Misrepresentation of Shelley.” The Keats-Shelley Review 23.1 (2009), 82–96.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Alan M. and Webb, Timothy, eds. The Neglected Shelley. Burlington: Routledge, 2016, 95–116.Google Scholar
Weisman, Karen A. Imageless Truths: Shelley’s Poetic Fiction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wilson, Ross, ed. Percy Shelley in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, in press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Ross. Shelley and the Apprehension of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J. Formal Charges: The Shaping of Poetry in British Romanticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan J. Romantic Shades and Shadows. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Susan. “‘Something must be done’: Shelley, Hemans, and the Flash of Revolutionary Female Violence.” In Fellow Romantics: Male and Female British Writers, 1790–1835, ed. Beth, Lau, 99–122. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Woodman, Ross. The Apocalyptic Vision in the Poetry of Shelley. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Wroe, Ann. Being Shelley: The Poet’s Search for Himself. New York: Vintage Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Young, Art. Shelley and Nonviolence. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.Google Scholar
Zephaniah, Benjamin. The Life and Rhymes of Benjamin Zephaniah: The Autobiography. London: Scribner, 2019.Google Scholar
Zephaniah, Benjamin. Too Black, Too Strong. Hexham: Bloodaxe Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×