Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T22:08:34.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Walter Hopp
Walter Hopp
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perception and Knowledge
A Phenomenological Account
 , pp. 226 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William. 1988. “The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification.” Philosophical Perspectives 2: 257–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William 1989. “What's Wrong with Immediate Knowledge?” In Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William 1996. A Realist Conception of Truth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William 1999. “Back to the Theory of Appearing.” Philosophical Perspectives 13: 181–203.Google Scholar
Alston, William 2002. “Sellars and the ‘Myth of the Given’.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert. 1983. “Foundationalism, Epistemic Dependence, and Defeasibility.” Synthese 55: 119–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert 2003. Epistemology, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1964. Sense and Sensibilia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 2007. “Searle Against the World.” In Tsohatzidis, S. L., ed., John Searle's Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Balog, Katalin. 2009. “Phenomenal Concepts.” In McLaughlin, B., Beckermann, A., and Walter, S., eds., Oxford Handbook in the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael. 2008. “Holism and Horizon: Husserl and McDowell on Non-conceptual Content.” Husserl Studies 24: 29–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, David. 1990. Husserl. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, David 1996. “The Formation of Concepts and the Structure of Thought.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56: 583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, M. R. and Hacker, P. M. S.. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Hugo. 1908. Untersuchungen zum Problem der Evidenz der inneren Wahrnehmung. Halle: Verlag von Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bermudez, José Luis. 2003. “From Perceptual Experience to Subpersonal Computational States.” In Gunther, Y. H., ed., Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernet, Rudolph. 2003. “Desiring to Know Through Intuition.” Husserl Studies 19: 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernet, Rudolph, Kern, Iso, and Marbach, Eduard. 1993. Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1984. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned. 2007. Consciousness, Function, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Laurence. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Laurence 1999. “Foundationalism and the External World.” Philosophical Perspectives 13: 229–49.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 2002. “Non-Inferential Knowledge, Perceptual Experience, and Secondary Qualities: Placing McDowell's Empiricism.” In Smith, N. H., ed., Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brewer, Bill. 1999. Perception and Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Bill 2004. “Realism and the Nature of Perceptual Experience.” Philosophical Issues 14: 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Bill 2005. “Perceptual Experience Has Conceptual Content.” In Steup, M. and Sosa, E., eds., Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brewer, Bill 2006. “Perception and Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 14: 165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Bill 2007. “Perception and Its Objects.” Philosophical Studies 132: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Bill 2008. “How to Account for Illusion.” In Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F., eds., Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Briscoe, Robert. 2008. “Vision, Action, and Make-Perceive.” Mind and Language 23: 457–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1925. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1977. “Belief De Re.” The Journal of Philosophy 74: 338–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1991. “Vision and Perceptual Content.” In Lepore, E. and Gulick, R., eds., John Searle and His Critics. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler 2003. “Perceptual Entitlement.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 503–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 2005. Truth, Thought, Reason: Essays on Frege. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex. 2001. “Intentionalism Defended.” Philosophical Review 110: 199–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex 2003. “Consciousness and Conceptual Content.” Philosophical Studies 113: 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex 2005. “Perception and Conceptual Content.” In Steup, M. and Sosa, E., eds., Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. 2009. “Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus Independence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78: 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John. 1996a. “Molyneux's Question.” Philosophical Issues 7: 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John 1996b. “Shape Properties, Experience of Shape and Shape Concepts.” Philosophical Issues 7: 351–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John 1999. “Immunity to Error through Misidentification and the Meaning of a Referring Term.” Philosophical Topics 26: 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph. 1967. The Logical Structure of the World. George, R. A., trans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Casullo, Albert. 2003. A Priori Justification. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Child, William. 1994. Causality, Interpretation and the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1942. “The Problem of the Speckled Hen.” Mind 51: 368–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick 1957. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick 1965. “The Theory of Appearing.” In Swartz, R. J., ed., Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick 1988. “The Evidence of the Senses.” Philosophical Perspectives 2: 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Carleton B. 1993. “Sense, Subject and Horizon.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 749–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuard, Philippe. 2006. “Demonstrative Concepts without Re-Identification.” Philosophical Studies 130: 153–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb-Stevens, Richard. 1990. Husserl and Analytic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb-Stevens, Richard 2003. “Husserl's Fifth Logical Investigation.” In Dahlstrom, D. O., ed., Husserl's Logical Investigations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Conee, Earl. 2004. “The Basic Nature of Justification.” In Conee, E. and Feldman, R., Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim. 1992. “The Nonconceptual Content of Experience.” In Crane, T., ed., The Contents of Experience. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim 2006. “Is There a Perceptual Relation?” In Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J., eds., Perceptual Experience. Oxford:Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, Mark and Perry, John. 1989. “The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs.” The Journal of Philosophy 86: 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2008. “Phenomenological Immanence, Normativity, and Semantic Externalism.” Synthese 160: 335–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, T. M. 2006. “Two Conceptions of Conceptualism and Nonconceptualism.” Erkenntnis 65: 245–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cussins, Adrian. 2003. “Content, Conceptual Content, and Nonconceptual Content.” In Gunther, Y. H., ed., Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2006. “Lost Horizons: An Appreciative Critique of Enactive Externalism.” In Ferrarin, A., ed., Passive Synthesis and Life-World. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel 2007. “The Intentionality of Passive Experience: Husserl and a Contemporary Debate.” The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 7: 25–42.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Inquiries Into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald 2001. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Martin. 1992. “Perceptual Content and Local Supervenience.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne A. 2003. Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne A. 2005a. Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference: An Ideational Semantics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne A. 2005b. “Concepts and Epistemic Individuation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 290–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Warren, Nicolas. 2006. “The Archaeology of Perception: McDowell and Husserl on Passive Synthesis.” In Ferrarin, A., ed., Passive Synthesis and Life-World. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. 1969. Seeing and Knowing. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. 2000a. “Entitlement: Epistemic Rights without Epistemic Duties?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60: 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Fred I. 2000b. “Simple Seeing.” In Perception, Knowledge, and Belief. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1982. “The Perceptual Noema.” In Dreyfus, H. L. with Hall, H., eds., Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science, 97–123. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Drummond, John J. 1979. “On Seeing a Material Thing in Space: The Role of Kinaesthesis in Visual Perception.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40: 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, John. J. 1990. Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, John. J. 1991. “Phenomenology and the Foundationalism Debate.” Reason Papers 16: 45–71.Google Scholar
Dubois, James M. 1995. Judgment and Sachverhalt. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1994. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 2006. Thought and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, Daniel J. 2007. “Husserl's Appropriation of the Psychological Concepts of Apperception and Attention.” Husserl Studies 23: 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fales, Evan. 1996. A Defense of the Given. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Farkas, Katalin. 2003. “What is Externalism?” Philosophical Studies 112: 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard. 2004a. “Authoritarian Epistemology.” In Connee, E. and Feldman, R., Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard 2004b. “The Ethics of Belief.” In Connee, E. and Feldman, R., Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. N. 1963. Language, Mind, and Value: Philosophical Essays. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Fish, William. 2009. Perception, Illusion, and Hallucination. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 2007. “The Revenge of the Given.” In McLaughlin, B. P. and Cohen, J., eds., Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn. 1969. “Husserl's Notion of Noema.” The Journal of Philosophy 66: 680–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn 1982. “Husserl's Theory of Perception.” In Dreyfus, H. L. with Hall, H., eds., Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forrai, Gabor. 2001. Reference, Truth and Conceptual Schemes. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, John. 2000. The Nature of Perception. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1994. “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” In Harnish, R. M., ed., Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1997a. “On Sinn and Bedeutung.” In Beaney, M., ed., The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1997b. “Logic.” In Beaney, M., ed., The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1997c. “A Brief Survey of My Logical Doctrines.” In Beaney, M., ed., The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. “Exorcising the Philosophical Tradition: Comments on John McDowell's Mind and World.” The Philosophical Review 105: 427–67.CrossRef
Fumerton, Richard. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard 2001a. “Epistemic Justification and Normativity.” In Steup, M., ed., Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard 2001b. “Brewer, Direct Realism, and Acquaintance with Acquaintance.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 417–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fumerton, Richard 2002. “Critical Study: Bill Brewer's Perception and Reason.” Noûs 36: 509–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun and Zahavi, Dan. 2007. The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1957. Mental Acts: Their Content and Their Objects. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabo and Hawthorne, John, eds. 2006. Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef
Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. 1976. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 73: 771–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin 2001. “Internalism Exposed.” In Kornblith, H., ed., Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1994 (1975). “Logic and Conversation.” In Harnish, R. M., ed., Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gupta, Anil. 2006. Empiricism and Experience. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1964. The Field of Consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron 1966. Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1987. Appearance and Reality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. 1994. “Perception, Sensation, and Non-Conceptual Content.” Philosophical Quarterly 44: 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Robert. 1993. “Logical Cognition: Husserl's Prolegomena and the Truth in Psychologism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 251–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Robert 2008. “Kantian Non-conceptualism.” Philosophical Studies 137: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1961. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1990. “The Intrinsic Quality of Experience.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, Richard G. 2000. “Nonconceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons’.” The Philosophical Review 109: 483–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, Richard G. 2007. “Are There Different Kinds of Content?” In McLaughlin, B. P. and Cohen, J., eds., Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heffernan, George. 1997. “An Essay in Epistemic Kuklophobia: Husserl's Critique of Descartes' Conception of Evidence.” Husserl Studies 13: 89–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffernan, George 1999. “A Study in the Sedimented Origins of Evidence: Husserl and His Contemporaries Engaged in a Collective Essay in the Phenomenology and Psychology of Epistemic Justification.” Husserl Studies 16: 83–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffernan, George 2009. “On Husserl's Remark That ‘[S]elbst Eine Sich als Apodiktisch Ausgebende Evidenz Kann Sich als Täuschung Enthüllen …’ (xvii 164:32–33): Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility?” Husserl Studies 25: 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., trans. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1985. History of the Concept of Time. Kisiel, T., trans. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1998. “Conceptual Competence.” Philosophical Issues 9: 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, David. 2004. “Hallucination, Sense-Data, and Direct Realism.” Philosophical Studies 120: 185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1975. The Intentions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko 1989. “The Cartesian Cogito, Epistemic Logic and Neuroscience: Some Surprising Interrelations.” In Hintikka, J. and Hintikka, M. B. P., The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko 1995. “The Phenomenological Dimension.” In Smith, B. and Smith, D. W., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, 78–105. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko 2003. “The Notion of Intuition in Husserl.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 224: 169–91.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko and John, Symons. 2007. “Systems of Visual Identification in Neuroscience: Lessons from Epistemic Logic.” In Hintikka, J., Socratic Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, J. M. 1967. “Experiences.” The Philosophical Quarterly 17: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, J. M. 1973. Experiences: An Inquiry into Some Ambiguities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Walter. 2008a. “Husserl on Sensation, Perception, and Interpretation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38: 219–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Walter 2008b. “Husserl, Phenomenology, and Foundationalism.” Inquiry 51: 194–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Walter 2009a. “Husserl, Dummett, and the Linguistic Turn.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 78: 17–40.Google Scholar
Hopp, Walter 2009b. “Conceptualism and the Myth of the Given.” European Journal of Philosophy 17: 363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Terence and John, Tienson. 2002. “The Intentionality of Phenomenology and the Phenomenology of Intentionality.” In Chalmers, D., ed., Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1955. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hendel, C. W., ed. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Nidditch, P. H., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. 1998. Consciousness in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1969. Formal and Transcendental Logic. Cairns, D., trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1970a. Logical Investigations, 2 vols. Findlay, J. N., trans. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1970b. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Carr, D., trans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1973. Experience and Judgment. Landgrebe, L., ed., Churchill, J. S. and Ameriks, K., trans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1977a. Cartesian Meditations. Cairns, D., trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1977b. Phenomenological Psychology. Scanlon, J., trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1982. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Kersten, F., trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book. Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Rojcewicz, R. and Schuwer, A., trans. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Brough, J. B., trans. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1997. Thing and Space. Rojcewicz, R., trans. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 2001. Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Steinbock, A. J., trans. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 2005. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory. Brough, J., trans. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 2008. Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge: Lectures 1906/07. Hill, C. O., trans. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylton, Peter. 1990. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1922. Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
James, William 1952. The Principles of Psychology. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar
Johnson, Bredo C. 1986. “The Given.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kent. 2004. “On the Systematicity of Language and Thought.” The Journal of Philosophy 101: 111–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Mark. 2006. “Better than Mere Knowledge? The Function of Sensory Awareness.” In Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. eds., Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 2009. “The Obscure Object of Hallucination.” In Byrne, A. and Logue, H., eds., Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. Smith, N. K., trans. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1994. “Demonstratives.” In Harnish, R. M., ed., Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sean. 2001a. “Demonstrative Concepts and Experience.” The Philosophical Review 110: 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Sean 2001b. “The Non-conceptual Content of Perceptual Experience: Situation Dependence and Fineness of Grain.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 601–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Sean 2004a. “Reference and Attention: A Difficult Connection.” Philosophical Studies 120: 277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Sean 2004b. “Seeing Things in Merleau-Ponty.” In Carmen, T. and Hansen, M. B. N., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy. 2003. “What's So Transparent About Transparency?” Philosophical Studies 115: 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Jeffrey C. 2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Colin. 2007. “An Imperative Theory of Pain.” The Journal of Philosophy 104: 517–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Hilary. 1980. “Beyond Foundationalism and the Coherence Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy 77: 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan. 2007. “Propositionalism and the Metaphysics of Experience.” Philosophical Issues 17: 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langsam, Harold. 2009. “The Theory of Appearing Defended.” In Byrne, A. and Logue, H., eds., Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Janet. 2008. “Molyneux's Question and the Individuation of Perceptual Concepts.” Philosophical Studies 139: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1973. The Theory of Intuition in Husserl's Phenomenology. Orianne, A., trans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1929. Mind and the World Order. New York: Daver Publications.Google Scholar
Liebesman, David. 2010. Review of Jeffrey C. King's The Nature and Structure of Content. Philosophical Review 119: 246–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loar, Brian. 1990. “Phenomenal States.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loar, Brian 2003. “Phenomenal Intentionality as the Basis of Mental Content.” In Hahn, M. and Ramberg, B., eds., Reflections and Replies: Essays in the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Nidditch, P. H., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lohmar, Dieter. 2002. “Husserl's Concept of Categorial Intuition.” In Zahavi, D. and Stjernfelt, F., eds., One Hundred Years of Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lohmar, Dieter 2006. “Categorial Intuition.” In Dreyfus, H. L. and Wrathall, M. A., eds., A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyons, Jack C. 2008. “Evidence, Experience, and Externalism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 461–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Jack C. 2009. Perception and Basic Beliefs. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majors, Brad and Sawyer, Sarah. 2005. “The Epistemological Argument for Content Externalism.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Eric. 1998. “How to Acquire a Concept.” Mind and Language 13: 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markie, Peter J. 2006. “Epistemically Appropriate Perceptual Belief.” Noûs 40: 118–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. 2003. “Perception, Concepts, and Memory.” In Gunther, Y. H., ed., Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. 2006. “On Being Alienated.” In Gendler, T. S. and , J. Hawthorne eds., Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. 2009a. “The Reality of Appearances.” In Byrne, A. and Logue, H., eds., Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, M. G. F. 2009b. “The Limits of Self-Awareness.” In Byrne, A. and Logue, H., eds., Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne M. 1999. “Husserl's Relapse? Concerning a Fregean Challenge to Phenomenology.” Inquiry 42: 343–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Wayne M. 2006. Theories of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, Mohan. 2005. Seeing, Doing, and Knowing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 1982. “Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge.” In McDowell, , 1998d.
McDowell, John 1984. “De Re Senses.” The Philosophical Quarterly 136: 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John 1986. “Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.” In McDowell, , 1998d.
McDowell, John 1991. “Intentionality De Re.” In McDowell, , 1998d.
McDowell, John 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1998a. “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality.” The Journal of Philosophy 95: 431–91.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1998b. “Précis of Mind and World.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 365–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John 1998c. “Reply to Commentators.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 403–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John 1998d. Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 2009. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given.” In Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin. 1982. The Character of Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Ronald. 1987. “Husserl and Frege.” The Journal of Philosophy 84: 529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Ronald 1999. “Naturalizing Phenomenology? Dretske on Qualia.” In Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., and Roy, J., eds., Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Smith, C., trans. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Millar, Alan. 1991a. Reasons and Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Alan 1991b. “Concepts, Experience and Inference.” Mind 100: 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Alan 2007. “The State of Knowing.” Philosophical Issues 17: 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Alan 2008. “Perceptual-Recognitional Abilities and Perceptual Knowledge.” In Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F., eds., Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Izchak. 1984. Husserl, Perception, and Temporal Awareness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Jared. 2009. “Phenomenology's Negative Dialectic: Adorno's Critique of Husserl's Epistemological Foundationalism.” Philosophical Forum 40: 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1990. “The Myth of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 24: 723–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett 2004. The Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, J. N. 2008. The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Montague, Michelle. 2007. “Against Propositionalism.” Noûs 41: 503–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Timothy. 2010. “Understanding and Simple Seeing in Husserl.” Husserl Studies 26: 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1951. “The Refutation of Idealism.” In Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1959. “Proof of an External World.” In Philosophical Papers. London: George, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1965. “Some Judgments of Perception.” In Swartz, R. J., ed., Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Moran, Dermot. 2005. Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul K. 1988. “Foundationalism, The Given, and C. I. Lewis.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5: 189–204.Google Scholar
Mulligan, Kevin. 1995. “Perception.” In Smith, B. and Smith, D. W., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nenon, Thomas. 1997. “Two Models of Foundation in the Logical Investigations.” In Hopkins, B. C., ed., Husserl in Contemporary Context. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Noë, Alva. 2002. “On What We See.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83: 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, Alva 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, Brian. 2000. Consciousness and the World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. 2002. Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 1983. Sense and Content: Experience, Thought, and Their Relations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1998. “Nonconceptual Content Defended.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 2001. “Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?” The Journal of Philosophy 98: 239–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 13: 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, John. 2001. Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Philipse, Herman. 1995. “Transcendental Idealism.” In Smith, B. and Smith, D. W., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pietersma, Henry. 1973. “Intuition and Horizon in the Philosophy of Husserl.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietersma, Henry 2000. Phenomenological Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993a. Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin 1993b. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, John L. 2001. “Defeasible Reasoning with Variable Degrees of Justification.” Artificial Intelligence 133: 233–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, John L. and Cruz, Joseph. 1999. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pollock, John L. and Oved, Iris. 2005. “Vision, Knowledge, and the Mystery Link.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 309–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Steven L. 2006. Restoring the Foundations of Epistemic Justification. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Price, H. H. 1950. Perception. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. 1909. Kant's Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pryor, James. 2000. “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.” Noûs 34: 517–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, James 2005. “There is Immediate Justification.” In Steup, M. and Sosa, E., eds., Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Harnish, R. M., ed., Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1961. From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. 1969. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Brody, B., ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reinach, Adolf. 1982. “On the Theory of the Negative Judgment.” Smith, B., trans. In Smith, B., ed., Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges. 1999. “Concepts and Stereotypes.” In Margolis, E. and Laurence, S., eds., Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Howard. 1994. Perception. London: Routledge.Google ScholarPubMed
Rollinger, Robin D. 2009. “Brentano's Psychology and Logic and the Basis of Twardowski's Theory of Presentations.” The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic, and Communication 4: 1–23.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1972. “The World Well Lost.” The Journal of Philosophy 69: 649–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Klaus. 1977. Evidenz in Husserls deskriptiver Transzendentalphilosophie. Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Runzo, Joseph. 1982. “The Radical Conceptualization of Perceptual Experience.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 205–17.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1984. Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript. Eames, E. R. in collaboration with Blackwell, K., eds. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1985. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Pears, D., ed. Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1999. The Problems of Philosophy. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Frege's Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, Nathan 1989. “Illogical Belief.” Philosophical Perspectives 3: 243–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Frings, M. S. and Funk, R. L., trans. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, Susanna. 2007. “Action and Self-Location in Perception.” Mind 116: 603–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, Susanna 2008. “The Situation-Dependency of Perception.” The Journal of Philosophy 105: 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, Moritz. 1959. “The Foundation of Knowledge.” Rynin, D., trans. In Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Schuhmann, Karl and Smith, Barry. 1985. “Against Idealism: Johannes Daubert vs. Husserl's Ideas I.” Review of Metaphysics 39: 763–93.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2006. “Do Things Look Flat?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72: 589–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1963. Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1975. “The Structure of Knowledge.” In Castandeda, Hector-Neri, ed., Action, Knowledge, and Reality: Critical Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shim, Michael K. 2005. “The Duality of Non-conceptual Content in Husserl's Phenomenology of Perception.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim, Michael K. 2010. “Representationalism and Husserlian Phenomenology.” Presented at the Workshop in Phenomenological Philosophy, Seattle University.Google Scholar
Siegel, Susanna. 2002. “The Role of Perception in Demonstrative Reference.” Philosopher's Imprint, vol. 2, no. 1, philosophersimprint.org/002001.
Siegel, Susanna 2006. “Which Properties are Represented in Perception?” In Gendler, T. S. and , J. Hawthorne, eds., Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Siewert, Charles P. 1998. The Significance of Consciousness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewert, Charles P. 2004. “Is Experience Transparent?” Philosophical Studies 117: 15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewert, Charles P. 2005. “Attention and Sensorimotor Intentionality.” In Smith, D. W. and Thomasson, A. L., eds., Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Siewert, Charles P. 2006. “Is the Appearance of Shape Protean?” Psyche 12.Google Scholar
Siewert, Charles P. 2007. “In Favor of (Plain) Phenomenology.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2001. “Perception and Belief.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2002. The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2008a. “Disjunctivism and Discriminability.” In Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F., eds., Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. 2008b. “Husserl and Externalism.” Synthese 160: 313–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barry. 1987. “On the Cognition of States of Affairs.” In Mulligan, K., ed., Speech Act and Sachverhalt: Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry 1989. “Logic and Formal Ontology.” In Mohanty, J. N. and McKennna, W., eds., Husserl's Phenomenology: A Textbook. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry 1999. “Truth and the Visual Field.” In Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., and Roy, J., eds., Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff. 1982a. “What's the Meaning of ‘This’?” Noûs 16: 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff 1982b. “Husserl on Demonstrative Reference and Perception.” In Dreyfus, H. L. with Hall, H., eds., Husserl, Intentionality, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff 1989. The Circle of Acquaintance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff 2004. Mind World. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff 2007. Husserl. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff and Ronald, McIntyre. 1982. Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowdon, Paul. 2005. “The Formulation of Disjunctivism: A Response to Fish.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soffer, Gail. 2003. “Revisiting the Myth: Husserl and Sellars on the Given.” The Review of Metaphysics 57: 301–37.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. 1971. “The Structure and Content of Husserl's Logical Investigations.” Inquiry 14: 318–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert 1981. “Husserl's Concept of Categorial Intuition.” Phenomenology and the Human Sciences, Supplement to Philosophical Topics 12: 127–41.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert 2000. Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert 2003. “Husserl's Sixth Logical Investigation.” In Dahlstrom, D., ed., Husserl's Logical Investigations. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Sosa, David. 2007. “Perceptual Friction.” Philosophical Issues 17: 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 1995. “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Moser, P. K. and Nat, A. Vander, eds., Human Knowledge, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest 2007. A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, Jeff. 2005. “Is There a Problem about Nonconceptual Content?” The Philosophical Review 114: 359–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, Jeff 2009. “Transparency, Internationalism, and the Nature of Perceptual Content.” Philosophy and Phenomenonological Research 79: 539–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 1997. “Names and Rigid Designation.” In Hale, B. and Wright, C., eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thau, Michael. 2002. Consciousness and Cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Charles. 2004. “The Silence of the Senses.” Mind 113: 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1967. Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twardowski, Kasimir. 1977. On the Content and Object of Presentations. Grossmann, R., trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, Michael. 1992. “Visual Content and Visual Qualia.” In Crane, T., ed., The Contents of Experience, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 1995. “A Representational Theory of Pains and their Phenomenal Character.” Philosophical Perspectives 9: 223–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, Michael 2000. Consciousness, Color, and Content. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 2006. “Nonconceptual Content, Richness, and Fineness of Grain.” In Gendler, T. S. and , J. Hawthorne, eds., Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael 2007. “Intentionalism and the Argument from No Common Content.” Philosophical Perspectives 21: 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tye, Michael 2009. Consciousness Revisited: Materialism without Phenomenal Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cleve, James. 1979. “Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle.” The Philosophical Review 88: 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, James 1985. “Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Belief.” The Monist 68: 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleve, James 1999. Problems from Kant. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cleve, James 2003. “Is Knowledge Easy – or Impossible? Externalism as the Only Alternative to Skepticism.” In Luper, S., ed., The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1994. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Vesey, G. N. A. 1965. “Seeing and Seeing As.” In Swartz, R. J., ed., Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Walton, Roberto J. 2003. “On the Manifold Senses of Horizonedness: The Theories of E. Husserl and A. Gurwitsch.” Husserl Studies 19: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welton, Donn. 1977. “Structure and Genesis in Husserl's Phenomenology.” In Elliston, F. and McCormick, P., eds., Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Welton, Donn 1983. The Origins of Meaning. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, Howard. 1986. “Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?” The Journal of Philosophy 83: 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David. 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, Dallas. 1967. “A Crucial Error in Epistemology.” Mind 76: 513–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1977. “The Paradox of Logical Psychologism: Husserl's Way Out.” In Elliston, F. and McCormick, P., eds., Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1984. Logic and the Objectivity of Knowledge. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1988. “A Critical Study of Husserl and Intentionality.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 19: 186–98 (part 1); 311–22 (part 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1992. “Finding the Noema.” In Drummond, J. J. and Embree, L., eds., The Phenomenology of the Noema. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1994. “The Integrity of the Mental Act: Husserlian Reflections on a Fregean Problem.” In Haaparanta, L., ed., Mind, Meaning, and Mathematics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1995. “Knowledge.” In Smith, B. and Smith, D. W., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willard, Dallas 1999. “How Concepts Relate the Mind to Its Objects: The God's Eye View Vindicated?” Philosophia Christi 2: 5–20.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael. 1977. Groundless Belief: An Essay on the Possibility of Epistemology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael 1988. “Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism.” Mind 97: 415–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael 2005. “Doing Without Immediate Justification.” In Steup, M. and Sosa, E., eds., Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williford, Kenneth. 2006. “The Self-Representational Structure of Consciousness.” In Kriegel, U. and Williford, K., eds., Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1987. “Are Concept-Users World-Makers?” Philosophical Perspectives 1: 233–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John W. 1953. “Linguistic and Epistemological Dualism.” Mind 62: 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshimi, Jeffrey. 2009. “Husserl's Theory of Belief and the Heideggerean Critique.” Husserl Studies 25: 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, Dan. 2001. Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan 2003. Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan 2004. “Husserl's Noema and the Internalism-Externalism Debate.” Inquiry 47: 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Walter Hopp, Boston University
  • Book: Perception and Knowledge
  • Online publication: 21 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758621.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Walter Hopp, Boston University
  • Book: Perception and Knowledge
  • Online publication: 21 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758621.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Walter Hopp, Boston University
  • Book: Perception and Knowledge
  • Online publication: 21 April 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758621.009
Available formats
×