Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:06:18.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Techniques to reduce crop loss: human and technical dimensions in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Ferrel V. Osborn
Affiliation:
Elephant Pepper Development Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe
Catherine M. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropoloty School of Social Science and Law, Oxford Brookes University, UK
Rosie Woodroffe
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Simon Thirgood
Affiliation:
Zoological Society, Frankfurt
Alan Rabinowitz
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Crop-raiding by wildlife is neither a new phenomenon nor a rare one. Farmers throughout the world are faced with trying to reduce or eradicate the impact of crop damage by wildlife to their standing crops. Insects, birds, rodents and ungulates are perhaps the most common sources of such conflict and there is a growing literature that details various strategies for reducing crop losses (Fiedler 1988; Giles 1989; Adesina et al. 1994); describes factors that increase farmer tolerance to losses (Decker and Purdy 1988; Messmer 2000); and discusses the introduction of systems for compensating farmers for losses incurred (Rollins and Briggs 1996; Nyhus et al. 2003). For example, wild ungulates and rodents cause an estimated $60-million-worth of damage to forest plantations annually and bird damage to agricultural crops is a multi-million-dollar problem in the USA (Dolbeer et al. 1994). Perhaps not surprisingly, then, rodents, invertebrates and birds receive the greatest attention within the literature on pest management. However, other animals – some of them threatened species – may also pose a considerable threat to farmers' livelihoods. Two types of mammal pests, elephants and primates, exemplify the complexities of managing intelligent and potentially dangerous crop pests, which are also of conservation concern. The problem may be chronic or sporadic, predictable or sometimes unpredictable (at least at the level of the individual); whatever the pattern, crop damage threatens the livelihood security of farmers living near wildlife.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×