Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:31:42.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Using the Best-Interests Standard in Treatment Decisions for Young Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Geoffrey Miller
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Controversies sometimes exist about how to make good treatment decisions for infants and young children. For example, consider the following:

Case 1: Baby T was born at 32 weeks gestation and, as predicted in prenatal screening, had (non-mosaic) trisomy 13 and a semi-lobar holoprosencephaly as well as microencephaly. The only indication that she is conscious is that she reacts to painful stimuli by crying and withdrawing, and with an increased heart rate. Her teenage parents, however, are angry and distrustful. They do not believe the doctors, nurses, and members of the ethics committee who agree that when Baby T is conscious she is in considerable pain and that her life-prolonging treatments have no prospect of improving her condition but merely of prolonging her dying. Although carefully and compassionately counseled before and after Baby T's birth about her condition, her parents insist that they want “everything done” because they believe their daughter will be “perfectly normal.”

Holoprosencephaly is a disorder that arises from the failure of the embryonic forebrain to divide correctly. Consequently, the lobes of the cerebral hemisphere do not form properly. A spectrum of severity exists depending on the extent to which the lobes form, ranging from most severe to nearly normal. Those with the most severe form die at birth, and all are mentally retarded. Baby T has a severe case, but not as severe as that of children in whom a single-lobe brain structure exists.

Studies show that most adults would not want to prolong children's lives with maximal life-saving interventions if, like Baby T, they faced an existence of severe and intractable pain.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×