Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:08:09.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Brain Death, Minimal Consciousness, and Vegetative States in Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Geoffrey Miller
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Various groups treat death in different ways. Medically, death is the diagnosis of a biological event. To the philosopher, people's interests and the obligations owed them are usually thought to depend on certain qualities possessed only by the living. In religious traditions, death may simply be a transition. To the anthropologist, it is a social event and the beginning of a ceremonial process. Legally the presence and determination of death are necessary when the decision is made as to whether the cause was natural, accidental, homicide, or suicide; when vital organs can be harvested for transplantation; when burial, cremation, or autopsy can occur; when inheritances must be determined; when a spouse can remarry; and when an individual can bring an action in his or her own right. Every culture has customs, norms, rituals, and ethical requirements and prohibitions surrounding death. In modern society, these requirements and prohibitions have been complicated by the ability to keep alive individuals who, in previous circumstances, would have died without intervention. In times past, the traditional approach to the recognition of death relied on the irreversible cessation of heart and lung function. A person would be seen to be unconscious and in a state resembling death, and another person, who was not necessarily a physician, would feel for a pulse, listen with his or her ear to the chest, and look for condensation on a mirror placed close to the nose and mouth. If no evidence of heartbeat or respiration was heard, felt, or seen, death was presumed present, and the passage of time would usually confirm this. There was not absolute public trust in this method, and some feared premature burial.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pediatric Bioethics , pp. 247 - 261
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×