Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:53:54.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Perivascular Dermatitis with No/Minimal Epidermal Changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2017

Asok Biswas
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avshalumov, K., Pichardo, R., Jorizzo, J.L., et al. (2008). Bullous mastocytosis: report of a patient and a brief review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol, 30, 455457.Google Scholar
Bansal, I., Kerr, H., Janiga, J. J., et al. (2006). Pinpoint papular variant of polymorphous light eruption: clinical and pathological correlation. J Eur Acad Dermatol, 20, 406410.Google Scholar
Barzilai, A., Shpiro, D., Goldberg, I., et al. (1999). Insect bite-like reaction in patients with hematologic malignant neoplasms. Arch Dermatol, 135, 15031507.Google Scholar
Bigby, M. (2001). Rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs. Arch Dermatol, 137, 765770.Google Scholar
Biswas, A., Richards, J.E., Massaro, J., et al. (2014). Mast cells in cutaneous tumors: innocent bystander or maestro conductor? Int J Dermatol, 53, 806811.Google Scholar
Böer, A., Bresch, M., Dayrit, J., et al. (2007). Erythema migrans: a reassessment of diagnostic criteria for early cutaneous manifestations of borreliosis with particular emphasis on clonality investigations. Br J Dermatol, 156, 12631271.Google Scholar
Brönnimann, M., Yawalkar, N. (2005). Histopathology of drug-induced exanthems: is there a role in diagnosis of drug allergy? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 5, 317321.Google Scholar
Davis, M.D., Perniciaro, C., Dahl, P.R., et al. (1998). Exaggerated arthropod-bite lesions in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic study of eight patients. J Am Acad Dermatol, 39, 2735.Google Scholar
Fink-Puches, R., Wolf, P.W., Kerl, H., Cerroni, L. (2008). Lichen aureus: clinicopathologic features, natural history, and relationship to mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol, 144, 11691173.Google Scholar
Fung, M.A. (2002). The clinical and histopathologic spectrum of “dermal hypersensitivity reactions,” a nonspecific histologic diagnosis that is not very useful in clinical practice, and the concept of a “dermal hypersensitivity reaction pattern”. J Am Acad Dermatol, 47, 898907.Google Scholar
Hannon, G.R., Wetter, D.A., Gibson, L.E. (2014). Urticarial dermatitis: clinical features, diagnostic evaluation, and etiologic associations in a series of 146 patients at Mayo Clinic (2006–2012). J Am Acad Dermatol, 70, 263268.Google Scholar
Hennino, A., Bérard, F., Guillot, I, et al. (2006). Pathophysiology of urticaria. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 30, 311.Google Scholar
Hollmann, T.J., Brenn, T., Hornick, J.L. (2008). CD25 expression on cutaneous mast cells from adult patients presenting with urticaria pigmentosa is predictive of systemic mastocytosis. Am J Surg Pathol, 32, 139145.Google Scholar
Hönigsmann, H. (2008). Polymorphous light eruption. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 24, 155161.Google Scholar
Hood, A.F., Elpern, D.J., Morrison, W.L. (1986). Histopathologic findings in papulovesicular light eruption. J Cutan Pathol, 13, 1321.Google Scholar
Jordaan, H.F., Schneider, J.W. (1997). Papular urticaria: a histopathologic study of 30 patients. Am J Dermatopathol, 19, 119126.Google Scholar
Justiniano, H., Berlingeri-Ramos, A.C., Sánchez, J.L. (2008). Pattern analysis of drug-induced skin diseases. Am J Dermatopathol, 30, 352369.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, N., Furukawa, F. (2007). Autoinflammatory syndromes with a dermatological perspective. J Dermatol, 34, 601618.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J., Burgin, S., Sepehr, A. (2011). Granulomatous pigmented purpura: report of a case and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol, 38, 984989.Google Scholar
Kieffer, C., Cribier, B., Lipsker, D. (2009). Neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis: a variant of neutrophilic urticaria strongly associated with systemic disease. Report of 9 new cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore), 88, 2331.Google Scholar
Kim, K.J., Chang, S.E., Choi, J.H., et al. (2002). Clinicopathologic analysis of 66 cases of erythema annulare centrifugum. J Dermatol, 29, 6167.Google Scholar
Kossard, S., Hamann, I., Wilkinson, B. (2006). Defining urticarial dermatitis: a subset of dermal hypersensitivity reaction pattern. Arch Dermatol, 142, 2934.Google Scholar
Krahl, D., Sellheyer, K. (2009). A scanning microscopic clue to the diagnosis of arthropod assault reaction: alteration of interstitial tissue is more common than a wedge-shaped inflammatory infiltrate. J Cutan Pathol, 36, 308313.Google Scholar
Krause, K., Grattan, C.E., Bindslev-Jensen, C., et al. (2012). How not to miss autoinflammatory diseases masquerading as urticaria. Allergy, 67, 14651474.Google Scholar
LeBoit, P.E. (2004). The last refuge of scoundrels. Am J Dermatopathol, 26, 516517.Google Scholar
Lipsker, D., Mitschler, A., Grosshans, E., et al. (2006). Could Jessner’s lymphocytic infiltrate of the skin be a dermal variant of lupus erythematosus? An analysis of 210 cases. Dermatology, 213, 1522.Google Scholar
Liu, H.N., Sheu, W.J., Chu, T.L. (1992). Scabietic nodules: a dermatopathologic and immunofluorescent study. J Cutan Pathol, 19, 124127.Google Scholar
Magro, C.M., Shaefer, J.T., Crowson, A.N., Li, J., Morrison, C. (2007). Pigmented purpuric dermatosis: classification by phenotypic and molecular profiles. Am J Clin Pathol, 128, 218239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, M., Magerl, M., Metz, M. et al. (2013). Practical algorithm for diagnosing patients with recurrent wheals or angioedema. Allergy, 68, 816819.Google Scholar
Miteva, M., Elsner, P., Ziemer, M. (2009). A histopathologic study of arthropod bite reactions in 20 patients highlights relevant adnexal involvement. J Cutan Pathol, 36, 2633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naim, M., Weyers, W., Metze, D. (2011). Histopathologic features of exanthematous drug eruptions of the macular and papular type. Am J Dermatopathol, 33, 695704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naleway, A.L. (2002). Polymorphous light eruption. Int J Dermatol, 41, 377383.Google Scholar
Peroni, A., Colato, C., Schena, D., et al. (2010). Urticarial lesions: if not urticaria, what else? The differential diagnosis of urticaria: part I. Cutaneous diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol, 62, 541555.Google Scholar
Pichler, W.J. (2003). Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Intern Med, 139, 683693.Google Scholar
Pincus, L.B., LeBoit, P.E., Goddard, D.S., Cho, R.J., McCalmont, T.H. (2010). Marked papillary dermal edema – an unreliable discriminator between polymorphous light eruption and lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. J Cutan Pathol, 37, 416425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rémy-Leroux, V., Léonard, F., Lambert, D., et al. (2008). Comparison of histopathologic-clinical characteristics of Jessner’s lymphocytic infiltration of the skin and lupus erythematosus tumidus: multicenter study of 46 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol, 58, 217223.Google Scholar
Ríos-Martín, J.J., Ferrándiz-Pulido, L., Moreno-Ramírez, D. (2011). Approaches to the dermatopathologic diagnosis of figurate lesions. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 102, 316324.Google Scholar
Rongioletti, F., Merlo, V., Riva, S., et al. (2013). Reticular erythematous mucinosis: a review of patients’ characteristics, associated conditions, therapy and outcome in 25 cases. Br J Dermatol, 169, 12071211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sams, H.H., Dunnick, C.A., Smith, M.L., et al. (2001). Necrotic arachnidism. J Am Acad Dermatol, 44, 561573.Google Scholar
Sardana, K., Sarkar, R., Sehgal, V.N. (2004). Int J Dermatol, 43, 482488.Google Scholar
Shmidt, E., Levitt, J. (2012). Dermatologic infestations. Int J Dermatol, 51, 131141.Google Scholar
Steen, C.J., Carbonaro, P.A., Schwartz, R.A. (2004). Arthropods in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol, 50, 819842.Google Scholar
Stefanato, C.M., Phelps, R.G., Goldberg, L.J., et al. (2002). Type-I cryoglobulinemia-like histopathologic changes in tick bites: a useful clue for tissue diagnosis in the absence of tick parts. J Cutan Pathol, 29, 101106.Google Scholar
Stratigos, A.J., Antoniou, C., Katsambas, A.D. (2002). Polymorphous light eruption. J Eur Acad Dermatol, 16, 193206.Google Scholar
Su, W., Hall, B.J., Cockerell, C.J. (2006). Photodermatitis with minimal inflammatory infiltrate. Clinical inflammatory conditions with discordant histologic findings. Am J Dermatopathol, 28, 482485.Google Scholar
Tharp, M.D. (1996). Chronic urticaria: pathophysiology and treatment approaches. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 98, S325S330.Google Scholar
Toro, J.R., Sander, C.A., LeBoit, P.E. (1997). Persistent pigmented purpuric dermatitis and mycosis fungoides: simulant, precursor, or both? A study by light microscopy and molecular methods. Am J Dermatopathol, 19, 108118.Google Scholar
Valent, P., Horny, H.P., Escribano, L., et al. (2001). Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res, 25, 603625.Google Scholar
Weedon, D. (2010). The vasculopathic reaction pattern. In Weedon, D., ed. Weedon’s skin pathology. 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, pp 195246.Google Scholar
Werner, B., Massone, C., Kerl, H., et al. (2008). Large CD30-positive cells in benign, atypical lymphoid infiltrates of the skin. J Cutan Pathol, 35, 11001107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weyers, W., Diaz-Cascajo, C., Weyers, I. (2003). Erythema annulare centrifugum: results of a clinicopathologic study of 73 patients. Am J Dermatopathol, 25, 451462.Google Scholar
Wolff, K., Komar, M., Petzelbauer, P. (2001). Clinical and histopathologic aspects of cutaneous mastocytosis. Leuk Res, 25, 519528.Google Scholar
Ziemer, M., Eisendle, K., Zelger, B. (2009). New concepts on erythema annulare centrifugum: a clinical reaction pattern that does not represent a specific clinicopathological entity. Br J Dermatol, 160, 119126.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×