
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Cardiac pseudotumors and other challenging diagnoses
- Section 2 Cardiac aneurysms and diverticula
- Section 3 Anatomic variants and congenital lesions
- Section 4 Coronary arteries
- Section 5 Pulmonary arteries
- Section 6 Cardiovascular MRI artifacts
- Section 7 Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
- Case 54 Pitfalls in arterial enhancement timing
- Case 55 Misdiagnosis of acute aortic syndrome in the ascending aorta due to cardiac motion
- Case 56 Aortic pseudodissection from penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
- Case 57 Ductus diverticulum mimicking ductus arteriosus aneurysm
- Case 58 Pericardial recess mimicking traumatic aortic injury
- Case 59 Neointimal calcifications mimicking displaced intimal calcifications on unenhanced CT
- Case 60 The value of non-contrast CT in vascular imaging
- Case 61 Shearing of branch arteries in intramural hematoma: a mimic of active extravasation
- Case 62 Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability
- Case 63 Aortoenteric fistula
- Case 64 Infammatory aortic aneurysm
- Case 65 Incorrect aneurysm measurement due to aortic tortuosity
- Section 8 Post-operative aorta
- Section 9 Mesenteric vascular
- Section 10 Peripheral vascular
- Section 11 Veins
- Index
- References
Case 60 - The value of non-contrast CT in vascular imaging
from Section 7 - Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Cardiac pseudotumors and other challenging diagnoses
- Section 2 Cardiac aneurysms and diverticula
- Section 3 Anatomic variants and congenital lesions
- Section 4 Coronary arteries
- Section 5 Pulmonary arteries
- Section 6 Cardiovascular MRI artifacts
- Section 7 Acute aorta and aortic aneurysms
- Case 54 Pitfalls in arterial enhancement timing
- Case 55 Misdiagnosis of acute aortic syndrome in the ascending aorta due to cardiac motion
- Case 56 Aortic pseudodissection from penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
- Case 57 Ductus diverticulum mimicking ductus arteriosus aneurysm
- Case 58 Pericardial recess mimicking traumatic aortic injury
- Case 59 Neointimal calcifications mimicking displaced intimal calcifications on unenhanced CT
- Case 60 The value of non-contrast CT in vascular imaging
- Case 61 Shearing of branch arteries in intramural hematoma: a mimic of active extravasation
- Case 62 Imaging features of aortic aneurysm instability
- Case 63 Aortoenteric fistula
- Case 64 Infammatory aortic aneurysm
- Case 65 Incorrect aneurysm measurement due to aortic tortuosity
- Section 8 Post-operative aorta
- Section 9 Mesenteric vascular
- Section 10 Peripheral vascular
- Section 11 Veins
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
The attenuation of blood depends on the hematocrit but is usually 20–35 HU. Subacute blood has a higher attenuation (50–80 HU) than flowing blood. This is because of a reduction of water content, which raises the concentration of hemoglobin. This property makes it possible to identify a vascular process such as an aortic rupture (Figure 60.1), aortic injury (Figure 60.2), acute thrombus (Figure 60.3), intramural hematoma or instability of aneurysm on non-contrast CT, by the “hyperattenuating sign.”
Hyperattenuating sign can be unmasked by using narrow windows and comparing diseased vessel to normal vessel.
Importance
Understanding the value of non-contrast CT in vascular imaging is important because sometimes iodinated contrast cannot be administered.
Typical clinical scenario
Unenhanced CT is almost routinely obtained in vascular imaging. This is to prevent mistaking inherently high-attenuation material for iodinated contrast (Figure 60.4). Additionally, after the administration of iodinated contrast the subacute hematoma in the vessel wall or thrombus becomes less apparent.
In certain circumstances iodinated contrast cannot be administered, such as impaired renal function, allergy to iodinated contrast or difficult venous access. The vascular imager, in these situations, should not write off the study because no contrast is in the arteries, as much information can still be gleaned.
Unenhanced CT may be obtained for a suspected nonvascular medical emergency such as renal stone or pancreatitis. It is important to look for an acute vascular process, which is in the differential diagnosis for renal colic and back pain.
Differential diagnosis
Aortic rupture, intramural hematoma, unstable thrombus, calcification, and periaortic hypercellular tumor.
Teaching point
Sometimes only non-contrast CT is available. The imagers should be aware that valuable information about the acuity of a vascular process can still be obtained without iodinated contrast.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular ImagingPseudolesions, Artifacts, and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 193 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015