Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Section 1 Diaphragm and adjacent structures
- Case 1 Pseudolipoma of the inferior vena cava
- Case 2 Superior diaphragmatic adenopathy
- Case 3 Lateral arcuate ligament pseudotumor
- Case 4 Diaphragmatic slip pseudotumor
- Case 5 Diaphragmatic crus mimicking adenopathy
- Case 6 Epiphrenic diverticulum mimicking hiatal hernia
- Case 7 Mediastinal ascites
- Case 8 Diaphragmatic PET/CT misregistration artifact
- Case 9 Lung base mirror image artifact
- Case 10 Peridiaphragmatic pseudofluid
- Section 2 Liver
- Section 3 Biliary system
- Section 4 Spleen
- Section 5 Pancreas
- Section 6 Adrenal glands
- Section 7 Kidneys
- Section 8 Retroperitoneum
- Section 9 Gastrointestinal tract
- Section 10 Peritoneal cavity
- Section 11 Ovaries
- Section 12 Uterus and vagina
- Section 13 Bladder
- Section 14 Pelvic soft tissues
- Section 15 Groin
- Section 16 Bone
- Index
- References
Case 10 - Peridiaphragmatic pseudofluid
from Section 1 - Diaphragm and adjacent structures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Section 1 Diaphragm and adjacent structures
- Case 1 Pseudolipoma of the inferior vena cava
- Case 2 Superior diaphragmatic adenopathy
- Case 3 Lateral arcuate ligament pseudotumor
- Case 4 Diaphragmatic slip pseudotumor
- Case 5 Diaphragmatic crus mimicking adenopathy
- Case 6 Epiphrenic diverticulum mimicking hiatal hernia
- Case 7 Mediastinal ascites
- Case 8 Diaphragmatic PET/CT misregistration artifact
- Case 9 Lung base mirror image artifact
- Case 10 Peridiaphragmatic pseudofluid
- Section 2 Liver
- Section 3 Biliary system
- Section 4 Spleen
- Section 5 Pancreas
- Section 6 Adrenal glands
- Section 7 Kidneys
- Section 8 Retroperitoneum
- Section 9 Gastrointestinal tract
- Section 10 Peritoneal cavity
- Section 11 Ovaries
- Section 12 Uterus and vagina
- Section 13 Bladder
- Section 14 Pelvic soft tissues
- Section 15 Groin
- Section 16 Bone
- Index
- References
Summary
Imaging description
Crescentic foci of increased T2 signal that mimic fluid may be seen at frequency-selective fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging adjacent to the diaphragm, and can be misinterpreted as small pockets of pleural fluid or ascites (Figure 10.1). The artifact is due to failed fat saturation secondary to local field inhomogeneity at the air-tissue interface between the lung and the diaphragm [1].
Importance
Unsuppressed fat may mimic fluid around the diaphragm, and falsely suggest the presence of pleural fluid or ascites.
Typical clinical scenario
This artifact is common, and in one study was seen in 81% (42/52) of unselected consecutive patients undergoing fatsuppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging [1].
Differential diagnosis
The correct diagnosis of failed fat suppression can be made by cross-registration with other sequences. For example, fat will be of high signal on unsuppressed T1-weighted images, while water will be of low signal (Figure 10.2). Another useful clue that is often seen is co-existent failed fat suppression in the subcutaneous tissue related to field inhomogeneities created by surface coil elements (Figure 10.3).
Teaching point
Apparent fluid around the diaphragm on frequency-selective fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging should be inspected closely, since it frequently represents pseudofluid due to failed fat suppression.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pearls and Pitfalls in Abdominal ImagingPseudotumors, Variants and Other Difficult Diagnoses, pp. 26 - 27Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010