Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:10:10.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Laymen, doctors and medical knowledge in the eighteenth century: The evidence of the Gentleman's Magazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Get access

Summary

For the nineteenth century the history of English medicine has long since ceased to be written as though it were simply the annals of heroic doctors and epoch-making breakthroughs. That old warhorse, the epic of medical progress, featuring The Revolution in Victorian Medicine and the consequent deliverance (as two recent popular books put it) from The Age of Agony to The Age of Miracles, has for some time now been comprehensively challenged by a variety of alternative ways of seeing.

For example, complementing Ackerknecht's work, the late Michel Foucault argued that The Birth of the Clinic spelt a revolution in ‘medical gaze’, with the new normative and technological order of the hospital entailing fresh diagnostic epistemologies and disease representations, all generating vast medical power. Paralleling and to some degree overlapping with Foucault, many medical sociologists have trained their spotlight on professionalization as the great dynamo of medical transformation. Their timely attention to professional ambitions further reminds us that the Victorian age saw the rise of the public health movement, and other critical encounters in medicine's equivocal relations with the state; and this in turn has implications for what one school of investigators has dubbed the ‘medicalization of life’ – a concept often linked with polemical exposés of the ‘disabling professions’ and ‘the expropriation of health’, and with a radical desire to demystify medicine's allegedly hegemonic role as a secular and naturalizing instrument of ‘social control’. Of course, as ‘medicalization’ proceeded and orthodoxy sandbagged its citadel in the Victorian age, ‘alternative’ medical therapies became steadily more marginalized; and awareness of this polarization has informed recent explorations of radical and plebeian medicine.

Type
Chapter
Information
Patients and Practitioners
Lay Perceptions of Medicine in Pre-industrial Society
, pp. 283 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×