Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction How to Integrate Exceptional Care with Cutting-Edge Technology
Book contents
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Access to Infertility Care
- Chapter 2 The Patient Evaluation of the Future: Genetics, New Diagnostics, and Prediction Modeling
- Chapter 3 Advances in ART Pharmacology: Drug Delivery Systems and the Pipeline
- Chapter 4 ART Monitoring: An End to Frequent Clinic Visits and Needle Sticks?
- Chapter 5 The IVF Cycle to Come: Laboratory Innovations
- Chapter 6 Integrative Care
- Chapter 7 Psychological Counseling: Ethical Challenges of the Future
- Chapter 8 Using Technology to Enhance Communication in Medically Assisted Reproductive Care
- Chapter 9 The Economics of IVF: Evaluating the Necessity and Value of Public Funding
- Chapter 10 Medical and Elective Fertility Preservation: Options and Suggestions for a Patient-Centered Approach
- Chapter 11 Patient Retention, Nursing Retention: The Importance of Empathic Communication and Nursing Support
- Chapter 12 Patient-Centered IVF Care
- Chapter 13 The IVF Patient Journey of the Future
- Index
- References
Chapter 7 - Psychological Counseling: Ethical Challenges of the Future
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2020
Book contents
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Patient-Centered Assisted Reproduction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Access to Infertility Care
- Chapter 2 The Patient Evaluation of the Future: Genetics, New Diagnostics, and Prediction Modeling
- Chapter 3 Advances in ART Pharmacology: Drug Delivery Systems and the Pipeline
- Chapter 4 ART Monitoring: An End to Frequent Clinic Visits and Needle Sticks?
- Chapter 5 The IVF Cycle to Come: Laboratory Innovations
- Chapter 6 Integrative Care
- Chapter 7 Psychological Counseling: Ethical Challenges of the Future
- Chapter 8 Using Technology to Enhance Communication in Medically Assisted Reproductive Care
- Chapter 9 The Economics of IVF: Evaluating the Necessity and Value of Public Funding
- Chapter 10 Medical and Elective Fertility Preservation: Options and Suggestions for a Patient-Centered Approach
- Chapter 11 Patient Retention, Nursing Retention: The Importance of Empathic Communication and Nursing Support
- Chapter 12 Patient-Centered IVF Care
- Chapter 13 The IVF Patient Journey of the Future
- Index
- References
Summary
The interplay between psychological and ethical issues continues to shape and define the role and responsibilities of professionals in the field of ART. Advances in ART have brought the process of creating a child some distance from nature, enabling physicians to offer patients a variety of permutations in terms of conceiving and carrying offspring. Women can be stimulated to produce multiple oocytes, resulting in multiple births that would not otherwise have occurred. Patients can receive donor gametes – eggs and/or sperm or embryos – to create children who (from a genetic point of view) would not otherwise have been created and whose genetic makeup does not reflect their own.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Patient-Centered Assisted ReproductionHow to Integrate Exceptional Care with Cutting-Edge Technology, pp. 81 - 94Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Fisher, MA. Replacing “Who Is the Client?” with a Different Ethical Question. Prof Psychol: Res and Practice. 2009; 40: 1–7.Google Scholar
Domar, A. Creating a Collaborative Model of Mental Health Counseling for the Future. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104: 277–80.Google Scholar
Gameiro, S, Boivin, J, Domar, A. Optimal In Vitro Fertilization in 2020 Should Reduce Treatment Burden and Enhance Care Delivery for Patients and Staff. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 302–9.Google Scholar
Grill, E. Role of the Mental Health Professional in Education and Support of the Medical Staff. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(2): 271–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Child-Rearing Ability and the Provision of Fertility Services: An Ethics Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108: 944–7.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Interests, Obligations, and Rights in Gamete and Embryo Donation: An Ethics Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111: 664–70.Google Scholar
ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Gamete and Embryo Donation. Human Reprod. 2002; 17(5): 1407–8.Google Scholar
ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: The Welfare of the Child in Medically Assisted Reproduction. Human Reprod. 2007; 22(10) 2585–8.Google Scholar
Blyth, E. Guidelines for Infertility Counselling in Different Countries: Is There an Emerging Trend? Human Reprod. 2012; 27: 2045–6.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics 6th Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation for Women Seeking to Preserve Future Reproductive Potential: An Ethics Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 1022–8.Google Scholar
Grill, E, Josephs, L, Brisman, M. Legal and Ethical Issues. In: Chan, P (ed.) Reproductive Medicine Secrets. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc., Medical Publishers; 2004; 342–62.Google Scholar
Gordon, EG, Barrow, RG. Legal and Ethical Aspects of Infertility Counseling. In: Burns, LH, Covington, SN (eds.) Infertility Counseling: A Compressive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Parthenon; 1999; 491–512.Google Scholar
Horowitz, JH, Galst, JP, Elster, N. Ethical Dilemmas in Fertility Counseling. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, E, Thorn, P, Wischmann, T. CBRC and Psychosocial Counselling: Assessing Needs and Developing an Ethical Framework for Practice. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011; 23: 642–51.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Recommendations for Gamete and Embryo Donation: A Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 47–62.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Using Family Members as Gamete Donors or Gestational Carriers. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 1136–42.Google Scholar
ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law. Intrafamilial Medically Assisted Reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(3): 504–9.Google Scholar
Marshall, LA. Intergenerational Gamete Donation: Ethical and Societal Implications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 1171–6.Google Scholar
Braverman, AM, Schlaff, WD. End of Anonymity: Stepping into the Dawn of Communication and a New Paradigm in Gamete Donor Counseling. Fert Steril. 2019; 111: 1102–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Informing Offspring of Their Conception by Gamete or Embryo Donation: A Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109: 601–5.Google Scholar
Borry, P, Rusu, O, Dondorp, W, Wert, G, Knoppers, BM, Howard, HC. Anonymity: Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Donor Conception. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101: 630–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasch, LA. New Realities for the Practice of Egg Donation: A Family Building Perspective. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 1194–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, L. Gamete Donation and Anonymity: The Ethical and Legal Debate. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 818–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, D. Domestic Implementation of the Donor-Conceived Child’s Right to Identity in Light of the Requirements of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Int J Law Policy Fam. 2018; 32: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hahn, SJ, Craft-Rosenberg, M. The Disclosure Decisions of Parents Who Conceive Children Using Donor Eggs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002; 31: 283–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indekeu, A, Dierickx, K, Schotsmans, P, Daniels, KR, Rober, P, D’Hooghe, T. Factors Contributing to Parental Decision Making in Disclosing Donor Conception: A Systematic Review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19: 714–33.Google Scholar
Golombok, S, Readings, J, Blake, L, Casey, P, Mellish, L, Marks, A, Children, Jadva V. Conceived by Gamete Donation: Psychological Adjustment and Mother-Child Relationships at Age 7. J Fam Psychol. 2011; 25: 230–9.Google Scholar
Ravitsky, V. Conceived and Deceived: The Medical Interests of the Donor Conceived. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012; 42: 17–22.Google Scholar
Ilioi, EC, Golombok, S. Psychological Adjustment in Adolescents Conceived by Assisted Reproduction Techniques: A Systematic Review. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21: 84–96.Google Scholar
Readings, J, Blake, L, Casey, P, Jadva, V, Golombok, S. Secrecy, Disclosure and Everything In-Between: Decisions of Parents of Children Conceived by Donor Insemination, Egg Donation, and Surrogacy. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22: 485–95.Google Scholar
Su, P. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive View. Yale J Biol Med. 2013; 86: 359–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Klotz, M. Wayward Relations: Novel Searches of the Donor-Conceived for Genetic Kinship. Med Anthropol. 2016; 365.Google Scholar
Zweifel, J. Donor Conception from the Viewpoint of the Child: Positives, Negatives, and Promoting the Welfare of the Child. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104: 513–19.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte or Embryo Donation to Women of Advanced Reproductive Age. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106: e3–7.Google Scholar
Zweifel, JE. Last Chance or Too Late? Counseling Prospective Older Parents. In: Covington, SN (ed.) Fertility Counseling: Clinical Guide and Case Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press; 150–65.Google Scholar
Arias, E, Xu, J. United States Life Tables (2017). National Vital Statistics Reports 68(7), June 24, 2019 (Tables A and B). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr07_508.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lackey, NR, Gates, MF. Adults’ Recollections of Their Experiences as Young Caregivers of Family Members with Chronic Physical Illnesses. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 34: 320–8.Google Scholar
Bauman, LJ, Foster, G, Silver, EJ, Berman, R, Gamble, I, Muchaneta, L. Children Caring for Their Ill Parents with HIV/AIDS. Vulnerable Child Youth Stud. 2006; 1: 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, N. Enhancing Shared Decision Making in Assisted Reproductive Technologies through the Use of Multimedia Platforms for Informed Consent. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 1267.Google Scholar
Madeira, JL, Rehbein, J, Christianson, MS, Lee, M, Parry, JP, Pennings, G, Lindheim, SR. Using the Engaged MD Multimedia Platform to Improve Informed Consent for Ovulation Induction, Intrauterine Insemination and in Vitro Fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 1338–46.Google Scholar
Gerris, J. Telemonitoring in IVF/ICSI. Curr Opin Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 29: 160–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, BM, Shilaih, M, Falco, L, Dammeier, F, Hamvas, G, Leensers, B. Wearable Sensors Reveal Menses-Driven Changes in Physiology and Enable Prediction of the Fertile Window: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(4): e13404.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A, Selvam, MKP, Sharma, R, Master, K, Sharma, A, Gupta, S, Henkel, R. Home Sperm Testing Device Versus Laboratory Sperm Quality Analyzer: Comparison of Motile Sperm Concentration. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 1277–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palanica, A, Docktor, MJ, Lee, A, Fossat, Y. Using Mobile Virtual Reality to Enhance Medical Comprehension and Satisfaction in Patients and Their Families. Perspect Med Ed. 2019; 8: 123.Google Scholar
Tran, A, Cooke, S, Illingworth, PJ, Gardner, DK. Artificial Intelligence as a Novel Approach to Embryo Selection. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: e430.Google Scholar
Hunter Cohn, K, Zhang, Q, Copperman, AB, Yurttas Beim, P. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for More Data-Driven Patient Counseling After Failed IVF Cycles. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108: e53-e54.Google Scholar
Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists. Guidelines for the Practice of Telepsychology. Amer Psychol. 2013; 68: 791–800.Google Scholar
National Association of Social Workers, Association of Social Work Boards, Council on Social Work Education, Clinical Social Work Association (2017). Standards for Technology in Social Work Practice (2017). Available at: http://www.socialworkers.org/includes/newIncludes/homepage/PRA-BRO-33617.TechStandards_FINAL_POSTING.pdfGoogle Scholar
The Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Moving Innovation to Practice: A Committee Opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104: 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar