Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:39:41.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Learning from Adverse Events: Classification Systems

from Section 3 - Reporting and Databases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

Sally E. Rampersad
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
Cindy B. Katz
Affiliation:
Seattle Children’s Hospital, Washington
Get access

Summary

Healthcare today is a field that is complex, highly specialized, and technical. When errors occur, especially those that could compromise patient safety, it is critical to record those incidents and the contributing factors that surround the events to facilitate processes to prevent those events from reoccurring. In recording these incidents, it is important to devise a classification system, a taxonomy, which will enable healthcare providers to report, analyze, and classify adverse events. The World Health Organization (WHO) created a taxonomy for adverse events categorizing its contributing factors, patient characteristics, and outcomes of that specific event, also classifying mitigating and preventative actions for that event. The Joint Commission (JC) and the Healthcare Performance Improvement (HPI) have taxonomies used by healthcare institutions across the United States today. It would be ideal to have a classification system that would be completely standardized and have patient safety data exchanged easily across systems. A system such as this would facilitate data entry, analysis, and strategy formation for prevention and mitigation. However, until healthcare is able to achieve this system, it is critical that providers take steps to educate each other about best practices to ensure patients receive the best quality and safest care.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chantler, C. The role and education of doctors in the delivery of healthcare. The Lancet. 1999;353(9159):1178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kram, R. Critical incident reporting system in emergency medicine. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2008;21(2):240244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, A, Schyve, P, Croteau, R, O’Leary, D, and Loeb, J. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: A standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2005;17(2):95105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tackling patient safety taxonomy: A must for risk managers. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management. 2008;28(1):7–17. P.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, P, Boaden, R, andEsmail, A. Managing risk: A taxonomy of error in health policy. Health Care Analysis. 2005;13:337–46. P.338.Google Scholar
Larizgoitia, I, Bouesseau, M-C, and Kelley, E. WHO efforts to promote reporting of adverse events and global learning. Journal of Public Health Research. January 2013;2(3):168–74.p.170.Google Scholar
Chang, A. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: A standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2005;17:95–105. P. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brixey, J, Johnson, T, and Zhang, J. Evaluating a medical error taxonomy. AMIA 2002 Annual Symposium Proceedings:71–5.p.71.Google Scholar
Elder, NC, and Dovey, SM. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: A synthesis of the literature. The Journal of Family Practice. 2002;31:927–32.Google Scholar
Throop, C and Stockmeier, C. The HPI SEC and SSER patient safety measurement system for healthcare. HPI White Paper Series, 2016; 1–32.Google Scholar
Chang, A. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: A standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2005;17:95105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Throop, C and Stockmeier, C. The HPI SEC and SSER patient safety measurement system for healthcare. HPI White Paper Series, 2011; 1–34.Google Scholar
Buetow, S, Kiata, L, Liew, T, Kenealy, T, Dovey, S, and Elwyn, G. Patient error: A preliminary taxonomy. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2009;7(3):223231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Throop, C and Stockmeier, C. The HPI SEC and SSER patient safety measurement system for healthcare. HPI White Paper Series, 2011; 1–34. p. 4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×