Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:08:00.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Paternalism in economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Christian Coons
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Michael Weber
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Economists are notoriously averse to paternalism. Yet the reigning methods of policy analysis in normative economics frequently counsel profoundly paternalistic policies. Or so we shall argue.

We take our cue from the current debate over the use of happiness and other psychological measures of well-being in economics. The debate concerns those who take happiness to be a relevant policy consideration, employing the methods of psychology to study the impact of economic policies on well-being, and those who don’t. We will call the former approach happiness-driven economics (HDE) and the most important variety of the latter minimalism. Minimalists argue that economics should minimize its normative commitments by adopting a preference-satisfaction theory of well-being and a decision procedure based solely on optimizing preference satisfaction; and, crucially, minimizing its use of psychological notions, relying instead on an austere methodology of revealed preference – “choice,” in a loose manner of speaking. Happiness-driven economics need not take happiness to be the sole, or even a central, focus of normative economics; it may see it only as one significant concern among others. But it does trade freely in psychological notions like happiness, asserting that economic policy analysis must go beyond a narrow focus on choice behavior. For convenience, our discussion centers on “happiness,” using that term loosely to refer to mental states like subjective well-being, life satisfaction, or emotional well-being, which have dominated recent discussion of well-being policy. However, the argument more broadly concerns the use of well-being indicators for policy, and the points made about happiness will generally apply to well-being regardless of which of the major theories of well-being is adopted.

Type
Chapter
Information
Paternalism
Theory and Practice
, pp. 157 - 177
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×