Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pascal's Wager , pp. 315 - 328Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Anderson, R. (1995). Recent criticisms and defenses of Pascal’s Wager. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 37: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (2015). Which party is better for the economy? April 14. politicsthatwork.com/blog/which-party-is-better-for-the-economy.phpGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, T. (1992). Super Boethium De trinitate. In Leonina, (ed.), Opera omnia. Vol. 50.Google Scholar
Arnobius, (1907–1911). Adversus Gentes, in Ante-Nicene Fathers: Translations of the Writings of the Fathers down to AD 325. Vol. 5. Trans. H. Bryce and H. Campbell. Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Bartha, P. (2007). Taking stock of infinite value: Pascal’s Wager and relative utilities. Synthese, 154: 5–52.Google Scholar
Bartha, P. (2012). Many Gods, Many Wagers: Pascal’s Wager meets the replicator dynamics. In Chandler, J. and Harrison, V. (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion (pp. 187–206). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartha, P. (2016). Probability and the Philosophy of Religion. In Hájek, A. and Hitchcock, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy (pp. 738–71). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartha, P. and DesRoches, C. T. (2016). The relatively infinite value of the environment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 95: 328–53.Google Scholar
Benci, V. and Di Nasso, M. (2003). Numerosities of labelled sets: a new way of counting. Advances in Mathematics, 173: 50–67.Google Scholar
Benci, V., Horsten, L., and Wenmackers, S. (2013). Non–Archimedean probability. Milan Journal of Mathematics, 81: 121–51.Google Scholar
Benci, V., Horsten, L., and Wenmackers, S. (2018). Infinitesimal probabilities. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69: 509–52.Google Scholar
Betty, L. S. (2001). Going beyond James: a pragmatic argument for God’s existence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 49: 69–84.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1999). Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blanchet, L. (1919). L’Attitude religieuse des jésuites et les sources du pari de Pascal. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 26: 477–516, 617–47.Google Scholar
Boolos, G. S., Burgess, J. P., and Jeffrey, R. C.. (2007). Computability and Logic, 5th ed. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buben, A. (2011). Christian hate: death, dying, and reason in Pascal and Kierkegaard. In Stokes, P. and Buben, A. (eds.), Kierkegaard and Death (pp. 65–80). Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Buben, A. (2013). Neither irrationalist nor apologist: revisiting faith and reason in Kierkegaard. Philosophy Compass, 8: 318–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buben, A. (2016). Meaning and Mortality in Kierkegaard and Heidegger: Origins of the Existential Philosophy of Death. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Buchak, L. (2012). Can it be rational to have faith? In Chandler, J. and Harrison, V. (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion (pp. 225–47). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, J. P. (1999). Grace. In Fitzgerald, A. and Cavadini, J. C. (eds.), Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia (pp. 391–98). W. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Cantillon, A. (2014). Le Pari-de-Pascal: étude littéraire d’une série d’enonciations. Vrin.Google Scholar
Cantor, G. (1966 [1932]). Gesammelte Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts. Herausgegeben von Ernest Zermelo, nebst einem Lebenslauf Cantors von A. Fraenkel. Springer. Reprinted by Hildesheim, Olms.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950a). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4: 20–40. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Casey, Patricia. (2009). The Psycho-social Benefits of Religious Practice. The Iona Institute.Google Scholar
Chen, E. and Rubio, D. (forthcoming). Surreal decisions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, W. (1840 [1638]). The Religion of Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation, in The Works of William Chillingworth. Hooker.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. (1879). The Ethics of Belief. In Lectures and Essays, Vol. 2 (pp. 177–211). Macmillan.Google Scholar
Connor, J. A. (2006). Pascal’s Wager: The Man Who Played Dice with God. HarperOne Publishers.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (2004). It is rational to believe in the resurrection. In Peterson, M. L. and VanArragon, R. J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (pp. 164–74). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Decety, J., Cowell, J. M., Lee, K., Mahasneh, R., Malcolm-Smith, S., Selcuk, B., and Zhouet, X. (2015). The negative association between religiousness and children’s altruism across the world. Current Biology, 22: 2951–55.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. (1875–77 [1746]). Assézar, J. and Tourneux, M. (eds.) Pensées philosophiques. Vol. 1. Garnier (fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Pensées_philosophiques/Addition_aux_Pensées_philosophiques).Google Scholar
Diderot, D. (1875). Addition aux Pensées philosophiques. In Assézat, J. (ed.), Œuvres complètes de Diderot. Vol. 1 (pp. 158–70). Garnier Frères.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. (2009). Diderot’s Early Philosophical Works (reprint). Trans. Jourdain, M. BiblioBazaar.Google Scholar
Diener, E. and Seligman, M. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13: 81–84.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Tay, L., and Myers, D. (2011). The religion paradox: if religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101: 1278–90.Google Scholar
Dreier, J. (1996). Rational preference: decision theory as a theory of practical rationality. Theory and Decision, 40: 249–76.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. (2003). Do vague probabilities really scotch Pascal’s Wager? Philosophical Studies, 112: 279–90.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. (2007). The persecutor’s wager. The Philosophical Review, 116: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, C. (2013). Religion and secular utility: happiness, truth, and pragmatic arguments for theistic belief. The Philosophy Compass, 8: 381–99.Google Scholar
Easwaran, K. (2014). Regularity and hyperreal credences. Philosophical Review, 123: 1–41.Google Scholar
Ecklund, E., Johnson, D., Scheitle, C., Matthews, K., and Lewis, S. (2016). Religion among scientists in international context. Socius, 2: 1–9.Google Scholar
Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., and Hartmann, D. (2006). Atheists as “other”. American Sociological Review, 71: 211–34.Google Scholar
Edwards, W. (1982). Conservatism in human information processing (excerpted). In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty (pp. 359–69). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrman, B. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrman, B. (2009). Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don’t Know About Them). Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Ehrman, B. (2014). How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Ehrman, B. (2016). Jesus Before the Gospels: How the Earliest Christians Remembered, Changed, and Invented Their Stories of the Savior. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2003). Pascal and decision theory. In Hammond, N. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Pascal (pp. 53–75). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, P. (2006). Why religion matters even more. Backgrounder #1992, Heritage Foundation (www.heritage.org/civil-society/report/why-religion-matters-even-more-the-impact-religious-practice-social-stability).Google Scholar
Foley, R. (1994). Pragmatic reasons for belief. In Jordan, J. (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fouke, D. C. (1989). Argument in Pascal’s Pensées. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 6: 57–68.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (1998). Two caricatures, I: Pascal’s Wager. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 44: 109–14.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (2015). The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Frierson, P. R. (2012). Two concepts of universality in Kant’s moral theory. In Shell, S. M. and Velkley, R. (eds.), Kant’s Observation and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fugate, C. (2014). The highest good and Kant’s proof(s) of God’s existence. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31: 137–58.Google Scholar
Galen, L. and Beahan, J. (2013). A skeptical review of religious prosociality research. Free Inquiry, 33: 14–24.Google Scholar
Galileo, (1954 [1638]). Discorsi e Dimostrazioni Intorno a Due Nuove Scienze. Translated as: Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2007). Religio Philosophi. In Antony, L. M. (ed.), Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (2009). What Happens after Pascal’s Wager: Living Faith and Rational Belief. Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J., Sedikides, C., and Neberich, W. (2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment: on the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23: 158–60.Google Scholar
Golding, J. (1990). Toward a pragmatic conception of religious faith. Faith and Philosophy, 7: 486–503.Google Scholar
Greco, J. and Turri, J. (2016). Virtue Epistemology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016. Ed. Zalta, Edward N.. (plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemology-virtue/).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990). The Philosophical Discourses of Modernity. Trans. F. Lawrence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1994 [1972]). The logic of Pascal’s Wager. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9 (1972): 186–92. Reprinted in J. Jordan (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. (2000). Objecting vaguely to Pascal’s Wager. Philosophical Studies, 98: 1–16.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. (2012a). Blaise and Bayes. In Chandler, J. and Harrison, V. S. (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion (pp. 167–86). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. (2012b). Pascal’s Wager. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2012. Ed. Zalta, Edward N. (plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/pascal-wager/).Google Scholar
Hájek, A. (manuscript). Staying regular? (hplms.berkeley.edu/HajekStayingRegular.pdf).Google Scholar
Hall, D., Matz, D., and Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14: 126–39.Google Scholar
Halpern, J.Y. (2010). Lexicographic probability, conditional probability, and nonstandard probability. Games and Economic Behavior, 68: 155–79.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. A. (2005). God vs. the Gavel: Religion and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hausner, M. (1954). Multidimensional Utilities. In Thrall, R. M., Coombs, C. H., and Davis, R. L. (eds.), Decision Processes (pp. 167–80). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Haybron, D. (2008). Philosophy and the science of subjective well-being. In Eid, M. and Larsen, R. (eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-being. Guilford.Google Scholar
Helman, C. (2011). The world’s happiest countries. Forbes, Jan. 19 (www.forbes.com/2011/01/19/norway-denmark-finland-business-washington-world-happiest-countries.html).Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 795–855.Google Scholar
Herbermann, C. (ed.) (1913). The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 10. Robert Appleton Company.Google Scholar
Herzberg, F. (2011). Hyperreal expected utilities and Pascal’s Wager. Logique et Analyse, 213: 69–108.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., and Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53: 575–604.Google Scholar
Himma, K. (2002). Finding a high road: the moral case for Salvific Pluralism. International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 52: 1–33.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1962). Cogito Ergo Sum: inference or performance? Philosophical Review, 71: 3–32.Google Scholar
Holyer, R. (1989). Scepticism, evidentialism and the Parity Argument: a Pascalian perspective. Religious Studies, 25: 191–208.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (2000 [1748]). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Beauchamp, T. L.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1998 [1779]). Principal Writings on Religion, including Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and the Natural History of Religion. Ed. Gaskin, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
IHEU (2016). Freedom of Thought Report. International Humanist and Ethical Union (freethoughtreport.com/).Google Scholar
James, W. (1956 [1896]). The Will to Believe. In The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1983b). Bayesianism with a Human Face. In Earman, J. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Testing Scientific Theories. Vol. 10. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jones, W. E. (1998). Religious conversion, self-deception, and Pascal’s Wager. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 36: 167–88.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (ed.) (1994a). Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (1994b). The many-gods objection. In Jordan, J. (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager (pp. 101–13). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (2006). Pascal’s Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joshanloo, M. and Weijers, D. (2014). Aversion to happiness across cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15: 717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, J. (2005). How probabilities reflect evidence. Philosophical Perspectives, 19: 153–78.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. (2010). A defence of imprecise credences in inference and decision making. Philosophical Perspectives, 24: 281–323.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1991). Practical Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1996). Religion and Rational Theology. Ed. and transWood, . A. W. and Di Giovanni, G.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1997 [1785]). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. and trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998 [1781/1787]). Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007). Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. and trans. Louden, R. B. and Zöller, G.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kasser, J., and Shah, N. (2006). The metaethics of belief: an expressivist reading of The Will to Believe. Social Epistemology, 20: 1–17.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1967–1978). Søren Kierkegaard’s Journals and Papers. 7 vols. Trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong, assisted by G. Malantschuk. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1988). Stages on Life’s Way. Trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1989). The Concept of Irony. Trans. H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1990). For Self-Examination and Judge for Yourself! Trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1997–2013). Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter, 28 vols. (plus corresponding commentary vols.) Ed. Cappelørn, N. J. et al. Gads.Google Scholar
Klick, Jonathan (2004). Econometric Analyses of U.S. Abortion Policy: A Critical Review. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 31: 751–82.Google Scholar
Knuth, D.E. (1974). Surreal Numbers: How Two Ex-Students Turned on to Pure Mathematics and Found Total Happiness. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., and Carson, W. B. (2010). Handbook of Religion and Health. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., and Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of Religion and Health. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1956 [1933]). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitrechnung. Ergebnisse der Mathematik. Springer. Trans. N. Morrison, Foundations of Probability. Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lahn, A. (2015). Gender equality gives men better lives (sciencenordic.com/gender-equality-gives-men-better-lives).Google Scholar
Larson, E. and Witham, L. (1998). Leading scientists still reject God. Nature, 394.6691: 313.Google Scholar
Lawes, M. J. and Perrin, M. R. (1995). Risk sensitive foraging behaviour of the round-eared elephant shrew. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37: 31–37.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. and Wagner, C. (1981). Rational Consensus in Science and Society. D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, A. (1995). Introduction. In Levi, A. (ed.), Pensées and Other Writings (pp. vii–xxxvii). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, P. A. (1975). Conversion from nonstandard to standard measure spaces and applications in probability theory. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 211: 113–22.Google Scholar
Lun, V. M. C. and Bond, M. H. (2013). Examining the relation of religion and spirituality to subjective well-being across national cultures. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5: 304–15.Google Scholar
Luther, M. (1959). The last sermon in Wittenberg. In Doberstein, J. W. (ed. and trans.), Luther’s Works: Sermons I (pp. 371–80). Muhlenberg.Google Scholar
Lycan, W. and Schlesinger, G. (1996). You bet your life: Pascal’s Wager defended. In Feinberg, J. (ed.), Reason and Responsibility (pp. 119–27). Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
McBrayer, J. P. (2014). The Wager renewed: believing in God is good for you. Science, Religion and Culture, 1: 130–40.Google Scholar
McClennen, E. (1994). Finite Decision Theory. In Jordan, J. (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager (pp. 115–38). Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Maia Neto, J. R. (1991). The christianization of Pyrrhonism: scepticism and faith in Blaise Pascal, Søren Kierkegaard, and Lev Shestov. PhD. diss., Washington University.Google Scholar
Maimonides, M. (2010). Mishneh Torah (Code of Jewish Law): Sefer Hamadah-Book of Knowledge. Moznaim.Google Scholar
Mancosu, P. (2009). Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: was Cantor’s theory of infinite number inevitable? The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2: 612–46.Google Scholar
Mang, E. (2009). How religion influences Canadian politics (rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/ericmang/2009/12/how-religion-influences-canadian-politics).Google Scholar
Marks, G. and Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102: 72–90.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1983). Pascal’s Wager as an argument for not believing in God. Religious Studies, 19: 57–64.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (2004). It is not rational to believe in the resurrection. In Peterson, M. L. and VanArragon, R. J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (pp. 174–84). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maslen, C. (2016). Pragmatic decisions about God from different points of view: the costs of apostasy. International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 80: 103–13.Google Scholar
Miles, T. (2011). Friedrich Nietzsche: rival visions of the best way of life. In Stewart, J. (ed.), Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources: Kierkegaard and Existentialism (pp. 263–98). Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., and Ariely, D. (2011). Who benefits from religion? Social Indicators Research, 101: 1–15.Google Scholar
Mooney, C. (2015). New study reaffirms the link between conservative religious faith and climate change doubt. (www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/05/29/this-fascinating-chart-on-faith-and-climate-change-denial-has-been-reinforced-by-new-research).Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. and Giblin, C. (2015). Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19: 339–48.Google Scholar
Moriarty, M. (2003). Grace and religious belief. In Hammond, N. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Pascal (pp. 152–57). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. (2017). The God Relationship: The Ethics for Inquiry about the Divine. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, D. B. and Teare, S. W. (1993). Probability of a tossed coin landing on its edge. Physical Review, 48: 2547–52.Google Scholar
Myers, D. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55: 56–67.Google Scholar
Myers, D. (2012). Reflections on religious belief and prosociality: comment on Galen (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 138: 913–17.Google Scholar
Myers, D. (2013). Religious engagement and well-being. In David, S., Boniwell, I., and Ayers, A. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Happiness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narens, L. (1980). On qualitative axiomatizations of probability theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 9: 143–51.Google Scholar
Neander, A. (1847). Über die geschichtliche Bedeutung der Pensées Pascal’s für die Religionsphilosophie insbesondere (Ein zur Feier des Geburtstages Seiner Majestät des Königs in der öffentlichen Sitzung der Akademie am 16. Oktober 1846 gehaltener Vortrag, 2. opl.).Google Scholar
Nelson, E. (1987). Radically Elementary Probability Theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nemoianu, V. M. (2010). The insufficiency of the many gods objection to Pascal’s Wager. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 84: 513–30.Google Scholar
Nemoianu, V. M. (2015). Pascal on divine hiddenness. International Philosophical Quarterly, 55: 325–43.Google Scholar
Newport, F., Witters, D., and Agrawal, S. (2012). Religious Americans enjoy higher well-being. February 16 (gallup.com/poll/152723/Religious-Americans-Enjoy-HigherWellbeing.aspx).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1968). The Will to Power. Trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1990). Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1997). Daybreak. Trans. Hollingdale, R. J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. J. Norman. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (2003). Writings from the Late Notebooks. Trans. K. Sturge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nishimura, K. (1992). Foraging in an uncertain environment: patch exploitation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 156: 91–111.Google Scholar
O’Connell, R. J. (1984). William James on the Courage to Believe. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Oishi, S. and Koo, M. (2008). Two new questions about happiness: “is happiness good” and “is happiness better?” In Eid, M. and Larsen, R. (eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-being. Guilford.Google Scholar
Oppy, G. (1991). On Rescher on Pascal’s Wager. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 30: 159–68.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1840). Gedanken über die religion und einige andern Gegenstände, 2 vols. Trans. K. Adolf Blech. Wilhelm Besser.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1919 [1659]). Polemical fragments. In Pensées. Trans. W. F. Trotter. Collier.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1963 [1653]). On the conversion of the sinner. Trans Johnston, T. P.. In Lafuma, L. (ed.), Pascal: Œuvres Complètes. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1995 [1655]). Letter on the possibility of the commandments. In Levi, A. (ed. and trans.), Pensées and Other Writings (pp. 205–12). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1995 [1656]). Treatise concerning Predestination. In Levi, A. (ed. and trans.), Pensées and Other Writings (pp. 213–26). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1995a). Pensées and Other Writings. Ed. and trans. Levi, H.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1995b). Writings on Grace. In Levi, H. (ed. and trans), Pensées and Other Writings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2011). The development and scope of Kantian belief: the highest good, the practical postulates and the fact of reason. Kant-Studien, 102: 290–315.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2012). The many gods objection to Pascal’s Wager: a decision theoretic response. Philo, 15: 158–78.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2014). Kant’s touchstone of communication and the public use of reason. Society and Politics, 8: 78–90.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2015). Kant’s “appraisal” of Christianity: biblical interpretation and the pure rational system of religion. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53: 485–506.Google Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2017). Restoring Kant’s conception of the highest good. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55: 435–68.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. (1971). Religion and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Random House.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. L. and VanArragon, R. J. (eds.) (2004). Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2009). Scientists, politics, and religion. July 9 ( www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-4-scientists-politics-and-religion/).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2010). Jesus Christ’s return to earth. July 14 (www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2010/07/14/jesus-christs-return-to-earth/).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2012). The world’s Muslims, ch. 3. August 9 (www.pewforum.org/2012/08/09/the-worlds-muslims-unity-and-diversity-3-articles-of-faith/).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2014). Religious landscape study (www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/religious-family/atheist/).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2015). Religion and views on climate and energy issues. Oct. 22 (www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/22/religion-and-views-on-climate-and-energy-issues/).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2017). Sharp partisan divisions in views of national institutions. July 10 (www.people-press.org/2017/07/10/sharp-partisan-divisions-in-views-of-national-institutions/).Google Scholar
Pirolli, P. (2007). Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pivato, M. (2014). Additive representation of separable preferences over infinite products. Theory and Decision, 77: 31–83.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. and Lim, C. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75: 914.Google Scholar
Qin, J., Kimel, S., Kitayama, S., Wang, X., Yang, X., and Han, S. (2011). How choice modifies preference. NeuroImage, 55: 240–46.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1953). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1976 [1936]). Truth by Convention. Reprinted in The Ways of Paradox. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1976 [1963]). Carnap and Logical Truth. Reprinted in The Ways of Paradox. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. (1994). Moral objections to Pascalian Wagering. In Jordan, J. (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager (pp. 61–81). Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Radcliff, B. (2013). The Political Economy of Human Happiness. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1985). Pascal’s Wager: A Study of Practical Reasoning in Philosophical Theology. University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Reuchlin, H. (1840). Pascals Leben und der Geist seiner Schriften zum Theil nach neu aufgefundenen Handschriften mit Untersuchungen über die Moral der Jesuiten. Cotta’sche.Google Scholar
Rinard, S. (2015). A decision theory for imprecise probabilities. Philosophers’ Imprint, 15: 1–16.Google Scholar
Rinard, S. (2017). No exception for belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94: 121–43.Google Scholar
Rohde, H. P. (ed.) (1967). Auktionsprotokol over Søren Kierkegaards Bogsamling. Det Kongelige Bibliotek.Google Scholar
Rota, M. (2016a). Taking Pascal’s Wager: Faith, Evidence and the Abundant Life. InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Rota, M. (2016b). A better version of Pascal’s Wager. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 90: 415–39.Google Scholar
Ryan, J. (1945). The argument of the wager in Pascal and others. New Scholasticism, 19: 233–50.Google Scholar
Saka, P. (2001). Pascal’s Wager and the Many Gods objection. Religious Studies, 37: 321–41.Google Scholar
Saka, P. (2002). Pascal’s Wager. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (www.utm.edu/research/iep).Google Scholar
Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., and Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: a meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37: 721–34.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. (1994). A Central Theistic Argument. In Jordan, J. (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager (pp. 83–100). Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A. (1958). The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 2. Trans. E. F. J. Payne. The Falcon’s Wing.Google Scholar
Shimony, A. (1955). Coherence and the axioms of confirmation. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20: 1–28.Google Scholar
Shontell, A. (2016). 69-year-old monk who scientists call the worlds happiest man. Business Insider, Jan. 27 (www.businessinsider.com/how-to-be-happier-according-to-matthieu-ricard-the-worlds-happiest-man-2016-1).Google Scholar
Sirmond, A. (1635). De immortalitate animae Demonstratio physica et Aristotelica Adversus Pomponatium et asseclas.Google Scholar
Sirmond, A. (1637). Démonstration de l’Immortalité de l’Ame, Tirée des Principes de la Nature, Fortifiée de ceux d’Aristote.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2000). Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic. 4th ed. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1986). Utilitarianism and its applications. In DeMarco, J. P. and Fox, R. M. (eds.), New Directions in Ethics (pp. 24–41). Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Snoep, L. (2008). Religiousness and happiness in three nations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9: 207–11.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1981). Revisability, a priori truth, and evolution. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59: 68–85.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1990). Contrastive empiricism. In Savage, W. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XIV: Scientific Theories (pp. 392–412). University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (2008). Empiricism. In Psillos, S. and Curd, M. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science (pp. 129–38). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. (1994). Infinite decision theory. In Jordan, J. (ed.), Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., and Schlosser, T. (2013). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across cultures. Social Science Research, 42: 90–105.Google Scholar
Stephen, L. (1898). Pascal. In Studies of a Biographer (pp. 277–93). Duckworth and Co.Google Scholar
Suh, E. and Koo, J. (2008). Comparing subjective well-being across cultures. In Eid, M. and Larsen, R. (eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-being. Guilford.Google Scholar
Talbott, T. (2004). No Hell. In Peterson, M. L. and VanArragon, R. J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (pp. 278–88). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Titelbaum, M. (2013). Quitting Certainties − A Bayesian Framework Modeling Degrees of Belief. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UK Office of National Statistics. (2016). Measuring national well-being. Feb. 2 (www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/datasets/measuringnationalwellbeinghappiness).Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. (1990). Figures in a probability landscape. In Dunn, M. and Gupta, A. (eds.), Truth or Consequences. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. M. A. (1763). The Works of M. de Voltaire. Vol. 26. Trans. T. Smollett et al. Newbery, Baldwin et al.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. M. A. (1856). A Philosophical Dictionary. Vol. 1. Trans. unknown. J. P. Mendum.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. M. A. (1961 [1778]). Philosophical Letters (Letters Concerning the English Nation). Trans. E. Dilworth. Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. M. A. (1971 [1764]). Philosophical Dictionary. Ed. and trans. Besterman, T.. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Voltaire, F. M. A. (1994 [1734]). Pascal’s thoughts concerning religion. (Letter XXV). In Cronk, N. (ed.), Letter Concerning the English Nation (p. 127). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J.von and Morgenstern, O.. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, D. (1964). The Decline of Hell: Seventeenth-Century Discussions of Eternal Torment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Walls, J. (2004). Eternal Hell and the Christian concept of God. In Peterson, M. L. and VanArragon, R. J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (pp. 268–78). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. (2007). The Bayesian and the Dogmatist. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107: 169–85.Google Scholar
Weeden, J. and Kurzban, R. (2014). The Hidden Agenda of the Political Mind. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wernham, J. C. S. (1987). James’s Will-to-Believe doctrine: a heretical view. McGill-Queen’s College Press.Google Scholar
Wetsel, D. (1994). Pascal and Disbelief: Catechesis and Conversion in the Pensées. Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Wetsel, D. (2003). Pascal and Holy Writ. In Hammond, N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Pascal (pp. 162–81). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973a). Deciding to believe. In Problems of the Self. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1973b). The Makropulos Case: reflections on the tedium of immortality. In Problems of the Self. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wing, Nick. (2017). There are still no open atheists in Congress. Huffington Post, Jan. 4 (www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/no-atheists-in-congress_us_586c074ae4b0de3a08f9d487).Google Scholar
Wood, W. (2013). Blaise Pascal on Duplicity Sin and the Fall: The Secret Instinct. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeniaras, V. and Akarsu, T. N. (2016). Religiosity and life satisfaction: a multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18: 1815–40.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., and Hall, J. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity: a meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17: 325–54.Google Scholar