Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:29:19.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Jeffrey D. Grynaviski
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Partisan Bonds
Political Reputations and Legislative Accountability
, pp. 223 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2006. “Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology.” Political Research Quarterly 59: 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul. 1976. “Generational Change and the Decline of Party Identification in America: 1952–1974.” American Political Science Review 70: 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul. 1979. “Developing Party Identification: A Further Examination of Life-Cycle, Generational, and Period Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1975. “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69: 1218–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14: 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2002. “Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24: 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher. 2005. “Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis.” Political Analysis 13: 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James, Merrill, Samuel, and Grofman, Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranoff, Robert. 1976. The Management of Electoral Campaigns. Boston: Holbrook Press.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John and Grynaviski, Jeffrey. ND. “Theories of Political Parties.” Forthcoming in the Oxford Handbook of Political Science.
Aldrich, John and Rohde, David. 1994. “Conditional Party Government Revisited: The House GOP and the Committee System in the 104th Congress, Extensions of Remarks.” APSA Legislative Section Newsletter: 19: 5–7.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John and Rohde, David. 1999. “The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: Theory and Evidence on Conditional Party Government.” Unpublished Manuscript.
Alesina, Alberto. 1988. “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System with Rational Voters.” American Economic Review 78: 796–806.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Spear, Stephen. 1988. “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Public Economics 37: 359–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Michael. 1998. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Michael and Franklin, Charles. 1994. “Uncertainty and Political Perceptions.” Journal of Politics 56: 671–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,American Political Science Association. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Party System, a Report. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen and Jones, Phil. 2007. “Constituents' Policy Perceptions and Approval of their Members of Congress.” Paper presented at the Workshop in Political Economy at the University of Chicago.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rodden, Jonathan and Snyder, Jr. James M. 2008. “The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 102: 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, Jr. James M., and Stewart, Charles. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 136–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aranson, Paul and Ordeshook, Peter. 1972. “Spatial Strategies for Sequential Elections.” In Niemi, Richard and Weisberg, Herbert, eds. Probability Models of Collective Decision-Making. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Armey, Richard. 1995. The Freedom Revolution. Washington, DC: Regnery.Google Scholar
Arnold, Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Scott and Mesquita, Ethan Bueno. 2008. “Informative Party Labels with Institutional and Electoral Variation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 20: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bach, Stanley, and Smith, Steven S.. 1988. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Baker, Jean. 1998. Affairs of Party: The political culture of Northern Democrats in the mid-nineteenth century. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Balz, Dan and Brownstein, Ronald. 1996. Storming the Gates: Protest Politics and Republican Renewal. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert and Sala-I-Martin, Xavier. 1991. “Convergence across States and Regions.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 107–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Efects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 194–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2001. “A Generational Model of Partisan Learning.” A paper presented at the American Political Science Association meetings, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24: 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumer, Donald C. and Gold, Howard J.. 1995. “Party Images and the American Electorate.” American Politics Quarterly 23: 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., and Vohs, K. D. (2001). “Bad Is Stronger Than Good.” Review of General Psychology, 5: 323–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen and Jennings, Kent. 1991. “Family Traditions, Political Periods, and the Development of Partisan Orientations.” Journal of Politics 53: 742–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Carl. 1907. The History of Political Parties in the Province of New York, 1760–1776. Bulletin of the University of Washington History Series, Vol. 3: 1–290.
Bernhardt, Daniel and Ingberman, Daniel. 1985. “Candidate Reputations and the Incumbency Effect.” Journal of Public Economics 27: 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T. and Coate, S. (1997). “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(1): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianco, William. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl and Black, Merle. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Earl and Black, Merle. 1992. The Vital South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl and Black, Merle. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Kimball, David, Meinke, Scott, and Tate, Katherine. 2003. “The Effects of Political Representation on the Electoral Advantages of House Incumbents.” Political Research Quarterly 56: 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, Cogan, John, Gaines, Brian, and Rivers, Douglas. 1996. “The Perils of Presidential Support: How the Republicans took the House in the 1994 midterm elections.” Poitical Behavior 18: 345–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., Cooper, Joseph, and Hurley, Patricia. 1979. “The Decline of Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4: 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry and Pope, Jeremy. 2002. “Down to the Wire.” Hoover Digest, issue 4.
Burns, James MacGregor. 1949. Congress on Trial: The Legislative Process and the Administrative State. Harper.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David, and Cogan, John. 2002. “Out of Step, out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review 96: 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Jay Pil. 1998. “Brand Extension as Information Leverage.” The Review of Economic Studies, 655–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claggett, William, Flanigan, William, and Zingale, Nancy. 1984. “Nationalization of the American Electorate.” American Political Science Review 78: 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claycamp, H. J. and Liddy, L. E.. 1969. “Predictions of New Product Performance: An Analytical Approach. Journal of Marketing Research 6: 414–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Josh, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Most Liberal Senator? Analyzing and Interpreting Congressional Roll calls.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37: 805–12.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 18: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela and Feldman, Stanley. 1989. “Candidate Perceptions in an Ambiguous World.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 912–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 578–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Aptrer, David, ed. Ideology and Discontent, pp. 219–41. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1979. “Rejoinder to Abramson.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip and Markus, Gregory. 1979. “Plus Ca Change: The New CPS Election Study Panel.” American Political Science Review 73: 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph. 1999. Congress and the Decline of Public Trust. New York: Westview.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review: 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary and Katz, Jonathan. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew W.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew W.. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary and Poole, Keith. 2002. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3):477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Roger, Oleszek, Walter, and Kephart, Thomas. 1988. “One Bill, Multiple Committees: Multiple Referrals in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. L. and Ferrantino, M. 1996. “Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: why do politicians lie?Public Choice 88: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Karpini, Michael and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Marchi, Scott and Gelpi, Christopher, and Grynaviski, Jeffrey. 2004. “Untangling Neural Nets.” American Political Science Review 98: 371–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1990. “Amenity Potential, Indivisibilities, and Political Competition.” In Shepsle, Kenneth and Alt, James eds. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desart, Jay. 1995. “Information Processing and Partisan Neutrality.” Journal of Politics 57: 776–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel and Feddersen, Timothy. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures: The Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92: 611–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, Evans, John, and Bryson, Bethany. 1996. “Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?American Journal of Sociology 102: 690–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. 1960. “Interregional Differences in Per-Capita Income, Population, and Total Income, 1840–1950.” Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas Byrne and Edsall, Mary D.. 1991. Chain Reaction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick. 2007. “Issue Ownership and Representation in the United States: A Theory of Legislative Response to Constituency Opinion.” Working Paper.
Enelow, James and Hinich, Melvin. 1981. “A New Approach to Voter Uncertainty in the Downsian Spatial Model.” American Journal of Political Science 25: 483–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James and Munger, Michael. 1993. “The Elements of Candidate Reputation: The Effect of Record and crEdibility on Optimal Spatial Location.” Public Choice 77: 757–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Mackuen, Michael, and Stimson, James. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert and Wright, Gerald. 1997. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce eds. Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert and Wright, Gerald. 2000. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Brad, David, Cogan, John, and Ferejohn, John, eds. Change and Continuity in Hose Elections. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert, Wright, Gerald, and McIver, John. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Lawrence. 2001. “Committees, Leaders, and Message Politics.” In Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce, eds. Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley and Conover, Pamela. 1983. “Candidates, Issues, and Voters.” Journal of Politics 45: 810–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John, McKelvey, Richard, and Packel, Edward. 1984. “Limiting Distributions for Continuous State Markov Models.” Social Choice and Welfare 1: 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson-Longman.Google Scholar
Fishel, Jeff. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1991. Social Cognition, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles. 1984. “Issue Preferences, Socialization, and the Evolution of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 459–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles and Jackson, John. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77: 957–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean and Jenkins, Jeffery. 2007. “Negative Agenda Control in the Senate and House: Fingerprints of Majority Party. Journal of Politics 69: 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John, Stern, Hal, and Rubin, Donald. 1995. Bayesian Data Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 1142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan and Green, Donald. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan and Green, Donald P.. 1998. “Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes,” American Journal of Political Science 42: 794–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John. 1998. Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, James G. 1996. Legislative the Revolution: The Contract with America in Its First 100 Days. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Newt. 1998. Lessons Learned the Hard Way. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Goodman, Paul. 1967. “The First American Party System” in Chambers and Burnham eds. The American Party Systems: Stages of Development.
Green, Donald. 1988. “On the Dimensionality of Public Sentiment toward Partisan and Ideological Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 758–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald and Palmquist, Bradley. 1990. “Of Artifacts and Partisan Stability.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 872–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald and Shickler, Eric. 1993. “A Multiple Method Approach to the Measurement of Party Identification.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57: 503–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald and Yoon, David. 2002. “Reconciling Individual and Aggregate Evidence Concerning Partisan Stability.” Political Analysis 10: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard. 2004. “Downs and Two-Party Convergence.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Merrill, Samuel, Brunell, Thomas and Koetzle, William. 1999. “The Potential Electoral Disadvantages of a Catch-All Party.” Party Politics 5: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grynaviski, Jeffrey. 2006. “A Bayesian Learning Model with Implications for Party Identification.” Journal of Theoretical Politics.
Grynaviski, Jeffrey and Corrigan, Bryce. 2006. “Specification Issues in Proximity Models of Candidate Evaluation (with Issue Importance). Political Analysis 14: 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grynaviski, Jeffrey. and Ha, Shang. 2003. “Party Polarization and Party Activists.” Unpublished Manuscript.
Grynaviski, Jeffrey and Harris-Lacewell, Melissa. 2004. “Shifting Allegiances? Are Black Voters Ready to Rethink Allegiance to the Democratic Party?” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meetings.
Hamill, Ruth, Lodge, Milt, and Blake, Frederick. 1985. “The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan, and Ideological Schemata.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 850–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Joseph 1992.“The Role of Party Reputation in the Formation of Policy.” Journal of Public Economics 49: 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Douglas. 2006. “Legislative Parties and Leadership Choice: Confrontation or Accommodation in the 1989 Gingrich-Madigan Whip Race.” American Politics Research 34: 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul. 1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul. 2004. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 4th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95: 619–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin H., Ledyard, John, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1972. “Nonvoting and Existence of Equilibrium under Majority Rule.” Journal of Economic Theory 4: 144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin H. and Munger, Michael C.. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin H. and Ordeshook, Peter. 1969. “Abstentions and Equilibrium in the Electoral Process.” Public Choice 7: 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1969. The Idea of a Party System. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hong, Sung-Tai and Wyer, Robert 1989. “Effects of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attribute Information: An Information Processing Perspective.” Journal of Consumer Research 16: 175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 45: 780–98.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Levine, Jeffrey, and Morgan, William, and Sprague, John. 1999. “Accessibility and the Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 3: 888–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel and Pildes, Richard H.. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process.” Stanford Law Review.
Jackson, John E. 1975. “Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 19: 161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1983. “The Systematic Beliefs of the Mass Public: Estimating Policy Preferences with Survey Data.” Journal of Politics 45: 840–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 1996. “The 1994 House Elections in Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 111: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 6th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Jennings, Kent and Markus, Gregory. 1984. “Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 68: 1000–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Kent and Niemi, Richard. 1978. “The Persistence of Political Orientations: An Over-Time Analysis of Two Generations.” British Journal of Political Science 8: 333–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Kent and Niemi, Richard. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2007. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 804–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Bruce, Magleby, David, Nelson, Candice, Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark, and Wolfinger, Raymond. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Kevin Lane. 2001. Strategic Brand Management, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick and McCubbins, Mathew. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Delegation and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Klein, Benjamin and Leffler, Keith. 1981. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.” Journal of Political Economy 89: 615–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 1994. “Group Identification in Political Context.” Political Psychology 15: 687–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Robin. 1999. Pursuing Majorities. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, David. and Wilson, Robert. 1982. “Reputation and Imperfect Information.” Journal of Economic Theory 27: 253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon and Berent, Matthew. 1993. “Comparisons of Party Identification and Policy Preferences: The Impact of Survey Question Format.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 941–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Carll. 1990. “Public Opinion and the Congress Problem.” Public Interest 100: 57.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45(October): 951–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laymon, Geoffrey and Carsey, Thomas. 2002. “Party Polarization and Conflict Extension in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levermore, Charles. 1896. “The Whigs of Colonial New York.” The American Historical Review 1: 238–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Gilat. 2004. “A Model of Political Parties.” Journal of Economic Theory 155: 250–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyden, Kevin and Borrelli, Stephen. 1994. “An Investment in Goodwill: Party Contribution and Party Unity Among U.S. House Members in the 1980s.” American Politics Research 22: 421–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipinski, Daniel. 2004. Congressional Communication: Content and Consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 90: 505–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, John R. 1987. “The Effect of Nontransferable Property Rights on the Efficiency of Political Markets: Some Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 32: 231–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowell, Lawrence. 1913. Public Opinion and Popular Government. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1994. “Quality, Not Quantity: Strategic Politicians in U.S. Senate Elections, 1952–1990.” Journal of Politics 56: 228–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Matthew. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas. 1978. Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory. 1983. “Dynamic Modeling of Cohort Change: The Case of Political Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 27: 717–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, Gregory and Converse, Philip. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 73: 105570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Nicholas. 1961. “Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 55: 345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974a. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974b. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6: 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan and Groseclose, Timothy. 2000. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 100–19.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “The Hunt for Party Discipline.” American Political Science Review 95: 673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2005. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard. 1966. The Second American Party System: Party Formation in the Jacksonian Era. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Marian C. 2002. Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Constitutional War. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Richard, McKelvey. 1976. “Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–82.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard. 1979. “General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models.” Econometrica 47: 1085–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, Richard. 1986. “Covering, dominance, and institution-free properties of social choice.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Samuel, Grofman, Bernard, Brunell, Thomas, and Koetzle, William. 2000. “The Power of Ideologically Concentrated Minorities.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Paul and Roberts, John. 1986. “Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality.” Journal of Political Economy 94: 796–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkis, Sidney. 1985. “Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Transcendence of Partisan Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 100: 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkis, Sidney. 1999. Political Parties and Constitutional Government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. et al. 1981. “Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science. 25:491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wlezien, Christopher, and Hildreth, Ann. 1991. “A Reference Group Theory of Partisan Coalitions.” Journal of Politics 53: 1134–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren and Shanks, Merrill. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren and Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Constituency Inflence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery and Anderson, Mary. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66: 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Philip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 78: 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Phillip. 1974. “Advertising as Information.” Journal of Political Economy 82: 729–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, Norman, Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John. 1979. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard and Jennings, Kent. 1991. “Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 970–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, John. 1983. Martin van Buren: The Romantic Age of American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nokken, Timothy. 2000. “Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll-Call Behavior, 1947–97.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 417–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokken, Timothy and Poole, Keith. 2004. “Congressional Party Defection in American History.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29: 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M. J. and Slivinski, A. (1996). “A Model of Competition with Citizen Candidates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(1): 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M.J. and Tourky, Rabee. 2007. “Party formation in single-issue elections.” Working Paper.
Page, Benjamin. 1976. “The Theory of Political Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 70: 742–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin and Jones, . 1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties, and the Vote.” American Political Science Review 73: 1071–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas. 1984. “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry.” The Review of Economic Studies 51: 139–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Matthew. 1995. “Toward an Economics of Comparative Political Organization: Examining Ministerial Responsibility.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11: 167–91.Google Scholar
Patterson, James. 1967. Congressional Conservatism and the New Deal: The Growth of the Conservative Coalition in Congress, 1933–1939. University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John. 1989. “The Theory of Issue Ownership.” Paper presented at the 1989 American Political Science Association Meetings.
Phillips, Cabell. 2000. From the Crash to the Blitz. New York: Fordham University PressGoogle Scholar
Polenberg, Richard. 2000. The Era of Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933–1945. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald. 1972. “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968.” American Political Science Review 66: 415–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomper, Gerald and Weiner, Marc. 2002. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party Voter: The Evolving Bases of Partisanship.” In Green, John and Herrnson, Paul eds. Responsible Partisanship: The Evolution of American Political Parties since 1950. University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith. 1998. “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 954–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith. 2005. “The Decline and Rise of Party Polarization in Congress During the Twentieth Century.” Extensions, Fall.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, Jeremy and Woon, Jonathan. 2008. “Made in Congress? Testing the Electoral Implications of Party Ideological Brand Names.” Journal of Politics, 823–36.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prendergast, William B. 1999. The Catholic Voter in American Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Charles and Boskin, Joseph. 1966. “The Roosevelt ‘Purge’: A Reappraisal.” Journal of Politics 28: 660–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rae, Nicol C. 1998. Conservative Reformers: The Republican Freshmen and the Lessons of the 104th Congress. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1954. The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Reeves, Keith. 1997. Voting Hopes or Fears?New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Remini, Robert. 1959. Martin van Buren and the Democratic Party. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ringquist, Evan and Dasse, Carl. 2004. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Campaign Promises?Social Science Quarterly 85: 400–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan and Neshkova, Milena. 2006. “Campaign Promises and Environmental Policy Choices in the U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the April, 2006, Midwest Political Science Association Meetings.
Roberts, Jason and Smith, Steven. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, John. 2001. Political Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1973. “Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process.” American Political Science Review 67: 889–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold. 1970. “The Effect of the Australian Ballot Reform on Split Ticket Voting: 1876–1908.” American Political Science Review1220–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Arthur. 1988. “The Meaning of Party Images.” Western Political Quarterly 41: 583–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric and Green, Donald. 1995. “Issue Preferences and the Dynamics of Party Identification.” In Freeman, John ed. Political Analysis, Vol. 5. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, Norman. 1978. “Instability of Simple Dynamic Games.” Review of Economic Studies 45: 575–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Norman. 1983. “Generic Instability of Majority Rule.” Review of Economic Studies 50: 695–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Norman. 1985. Social Choice and Democracy. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas. 1977. “Collective Choice, Separation of Issues, and Vote Trading.” American Political Science Review 71: 999–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, Patrick. 2000. “Manipulating the Message in the U.S. Congress.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 5: 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Byron and Johnston, Richard. 2006. The End of Southern Exceptionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, J. B. 1939. “Presidential Politics in the South: 1938, I.” Journal of Politics 1: 146–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 1983. “Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 9: 659–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, Joel. 1967. The Shrine of Party: Congressional Voting Behavior, 1841–1852. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1999. “Transformation Agent or Faithful Leader? Principal-Agent Theory and House Majority Party Leadership.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24: 421–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven and Ray, Bruce. 1983. “The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments. Congress and the Presidency 10: 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven. 2007. Party Influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James and Groseclose, Tim. 2001. “Estimating Party Influence on Congressional Roll Call Voting: Regression Coefficients vs. Classification Success.” American Political Science Review 95: 689–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James M. and Ting, Michael. 2002. “An Informational Rationale for Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 90–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James and Ting, Michael. 2003. “Roll Calls, Party Labels, and Elections.” Political Analysis 11: 419–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steely, Mel. 2000. The Gentleman from Georgia: The Biography of Newt Gingrich. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald. 1965. “A Variance Components Model of Political Effects.” In Claunch, John ed. Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald and Miller, Warren. 1962. “Party Government and the Salience of Congress.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, Jean. 1996. “A Theory of Collective Reputations, with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality.” Review of Economic Studies 63: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trilling, Richard. 1976. Party Image and Electoral Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel. 1983. “Extensional versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.” Psychological Review 90: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Michael. 1969. “Changing Concepts of Party in the United States: New York, 1815–1828.” American Historical Review 74: 453–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin. 1981. “The Decline of American Party Politics: Negativity or Neutrality?American Political Science Review 75: 941–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1982. “From Parties to Candidates: Examining the Role of the Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46: 216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1994. The Decline of American Political Parties 1952–1992. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weiher, Kenneth. 1977. “The Cotton Industry and Southern Industrialization, 1880–1930.” Explorations in Economic History 14: 120–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert. 2002. “The Party in the Electorate as a Basis for More Responsible Parties.” In Green, John and Herrnson, Paul eds. Responsible Partisanship: The Evolution of American Political Parties since 1950. University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert. 1980. “A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification.” Political Behavior 2: 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernerfelt, Birger. 1988. “Umbrella Branding as a Signal of New Product Quality: An Example of Signaling by Posting a Bond.” RAND Journal of Economics 19: 458–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1900. [2002]. Congressional Government, 15th ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Originally published by Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1983. “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.” American Political Science Review 77: 142–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolinsky, Asher. 1983. “Prices as Signals of Product Quality.” The Review of Economic Studies 50: 647–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann. 1974. The Strange Career of Jim Crow. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. 1986. “Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy since the Civil War.” Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jeffrey D. Grynaviski, University of Chicago
  • Book: Partisan Bonds
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676055.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jeffrey D. Grynaviski, University of Chicago
  • Book: Partisan Bonds
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676055.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jeffrey D. Grynaviski, University of Chicago
  • Book: Partisan Bonds
  • Online publication: 05 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676055.008
Available formats
×