Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:24:10.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Participation as God’s Indwelling

Aquinas’ Neoplatonic Systematisation of Aristotle for Participation in the Divine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2024

Douglas Hedley
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Daniel J. Tolan
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

“The universe, in its most profound structure, is essentially a participation of the First and simple Perfection from which it proceeds. It is above all the reflection and imitation of an absolutely perfect exemplar.” Thus concluded Louis-Bertrand Geiger in his unsurpassed treatment of participation in the philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas.1 Within this frame, participation is at the culmination of Aquinas’ treatment of God Himself in the Summa theologiae, the Sending of the Divine Persons. There, two modes of God’s presence appear. First, there is a common one according to which God is in all things through the Proclean triad of essence, power and presence, just in the way a cause is in the effects which participate its goodness. Creation as a whole is participation of this kind.

Type
Chapter
Information
Participation in the Divine
A Philosophical History, From Antiquity to the Modern Era
, pp. 220 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Albertus Magnus: Super Dionysium De divinis nominibus, ed. Simon, Paul. Münster: Aschendorff, 1972.Google Scholar
Aquinas: In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Expositio, ed. Cathala, M. R. and Spiazzi, R. M.. Turin: Marietti, 1964.Google Scholar
Aquinas: De Substantiis Separatis, ed. Fratrum Praedicatorum, . Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1968.Google Scholar
Aquinas: Sententia libri De Anima, ed. Fratrum Praedicatorum, . Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1984.Google Scholar
Aquinas. In Librum Beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus Expositio, ed. Pera, Ceslai. Turin: Marietti, 1950.Google Scholar
Aquinas. Scriptum super Sententiis, ed. and trans. Busa, Roberto. Parma: Textum Parmae, 1856.Google Scholar
Proclus: The Elements of Theology, ed. Dodds, E. R.. 2nd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, vol. ii, ed. and trans. Runia, David T. and Share, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Proclus: Théologie platonicienne, vol. ii, ed. and trans. Saffrey, Henri D. and Westerink, Leendert G.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1974.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

de Belloy, Camille. 2006. La visite de Dieu: Essai sur les missions des personnes divines selon saint Thomas d’Aquin. Geneva: Ad Solem.Google Scholar
de Belloy, Camille. 2014. Dieu comme soi-même. Connaissance de soi et connaissance de dieu selon Thomas d’Aquin: L’herméneutique d’Ambroise Gardeil. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Blankenhorn, Bernard. 2015. The Mystery of Union with God: Dionysian Mysticism in Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Eli. 2015. Mortal Imitations of Divine Life. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. 1939. La nozione metafisica di partecipazione secondo S. Tomaso d’Aquino. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Fabro, Cornelio. 1961. Participation et causalité selon S. Thomas d’Aquin. Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Geiger, Louis-Bertrand. 1953. La Participation dans la philosophie de S. Thomas d’Aquin, 2nd ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Geiger, Louis-Bertrand. 2000. Penser avec Thomas d’Aquin: Etudes thomistes de Louis-Bertrand Geiger OP, présentées par Ruedi Imbach. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. 2005. Aristotle and Other Platonists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 1987 / 2000. God in Himself, Aquinas’ Doctrine of God as Expounded in the Summa Theologiae. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 1998a. “From Metaphysics to History, from Exodus to Neoplatonism, from Scholasticism to Pluralism: the Fate of Gilsonian Thomism in English-Speaking North America.” Dionysius 16: 157–88.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 1998b. “Denys and Aquinas: Antimodern Cold and Postmodern Hot,” in Christian Origins: Theology, Rhetoric and Community, ed. Ayres, Lewis and Jones, Gareth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 2002. “Thomas’ Neoplatonic Histories: His Following of Simplicius.” Dionysius 20: 153–78.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 2004. “Participatio divini luminis, Aquinas’ doctrine of the Agent Intellect: Our Capacity for Contemplation.” Dionysius 22: 149–78.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 2006. One Hundred Years of Neoplatonism in France: A Brief Philosophical History. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Hankey, Wayne J. 2016. “The Concord of Aristotle, Proclus, the Liber de Causis & Blessed Dionysius in Thomas Aquinas, Student of Albertus Magnus.” Dionysius 34: 137209.Google Scholar
Oliva, Adriano. 2009–10. “La Somme de théologie de saint Thomas d’Aquin: Introduction historique et littéraire.” χώρα REAM 7–8, 217–53.Google Scholar
Oliva, Adriano. 2012. “La contemplation des philosophes selon Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 96: 585662.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Fran. 1992. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peghaire, Julien. 1932. “L’axiome ‘Bonum est diffusivum sui’ dans le néo-platonisme et le thomisme.” Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa 1, special section: 530.Google Scholar
Peghaire, Julien. 1936. Intellectus et Ratio selon S. Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Perl, Eric. 2007. Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Albany: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, Timothy. 2009. “Eros as Hierarchical Principle: A Re-evaluation of Dionysius’ Neoplatonism.” Dionysius 27: 7196.Google Scholar
Riggs, Timothy. 2010. “Erôs, the Son, and the Gods as Metaphysical Principles in Proclus and Dionysius.” Dionysius 28: 97130.Google Scholar
Smit, Houston. 2001. “Aquinas’s Abstractionism.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10: 85118.Google Scholar
te Velde, Rudi. 1995. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×