Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Formative Years
- Part II Institutions and Market Performance
- Part III Public Goods
- Part IV Auctions and Institutional Design
- PART V Industrial Organization
- Introduction
- 32 An Empirical Study of Decentralized Institutions of Monopoly Restraint
- 33 Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results
- 34 In Search of Predatory Pricing
- Part VI Perspectives on Economics
33 - Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I The Formative Years
- Part II Institutions and Market Performance
- Part III Public Goods
- Part IV Auctions and Institutional Design
- PART V Industrial Organization
- Introduction
- 32 An Empirical Study of Decentralized Institutions of Monopoly Restraint
- 33 Natural Monopoly and Contested Markets: Some Experimental Results
- 34 In Search of Predatory Pricing
- Part VI Perspectives on Economics
Summary
INTRODUCTION
The concept of natural monopoly is one of the most familiar in economics. Most textbook descriptions are similar to that of Mansfield:
… [A] firm may become a monopolist because the average cost of producing the product reaches a minimum at an output rate that is big enough to satisfy the entire market at a price that is profitable. In a situation of this sort, if there is more than one firm producing the product, each must be producing at a higher-than-minimum level of average cost. Each may be inclined to cut the price to increase its output rate and reduce its average costs. The result is likely to be economic warfare—and the survival of a single victor, the monopolist.
Many supposed natural monopolies are the object of widespread state, local, and federal regulation. It was in addressing issues of public utility regulation that Demsetz laid the foundation for an alternative scenario for decreasing cost markets. In a model of rivals offering goods or services through a bidding process, Demsetz says:
Economies of scale in production imply that the bids submitted will offer increasing quantities at lower per unit costs, but production scale economies imply nothing obvious about how competitive these prices will be.…
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Papers in Experimental Economics , pp. 731 - 753Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1991