Book contents
- Painting, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Rome
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- Painting, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Rome
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Plates
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Painting of Painting in Ancient Rome
- 1 Winckelmann and the Cultural Dynamics of Painting
- 2 Disrupting the Frame
- 3 The Ethics and Politics of Art
- 4 Transparent and Opaque: Medium and Materiality on the Roman Wall
- 5 Paradigms, Ensembles, and Anachronisms
- Epilogue: Reflection and Reflexivity
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2019
Book contents
- Painting, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Rome
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- Painting, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Rome
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Plates
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Painting of Painting in Ancient Rome
- 1 Winckelmann and the Cultural Dynamics of Painting
- 2 Disrupting the Frame
- 3 The Ethics and Politics of Art
- 4 Transparent and Opaque: Medium and Materiality on the Roman Wall
- 5 Paradigms, Ensembles, and Anachronisms
- Epilogue: Reflection and Reflexivity
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Painting, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Rome , pp. 235 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abdy, R. (2012). “Tetrarchy and the House of Constantine,” in Metcalf, W. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Coinage. Oxford.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., and Baumbach, M. (eds.) (2004). Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (2009). The Signature of All Things: On Method. Trans. L. di Santo. New York.Google Scholar
Alcock, S.E. (1996). “Landscapes of Memory and the Authority of Pausanias,” in Musti, D. and Bingen, J. (eds.), Pausanias historien: huits exposés suivis de discussions. Geneva, 241–276.Google Scholar
Alloa, E. (2009). “Metaxu. Figures de la médialité chez Aristote,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 62: 247–262.Google Scholar
Allroggen-Bedel, A. (1974). Maskendarstellungen in der römisch-kampanischen Wandmalerei. Munich.Google Scholar
Allroggen-Bedel, A. (1975). “Zur Datierung der Wandmalereien in der Villa Imperiale in Pompeji,” Bulletin antieke beschaving 50: 225–236.Google Scholar
Alsop, J. (1982). The Rare Art Traditions: The History of Art Collecting and Its Linked Phenomena Wherever These Have Appeared. New York.Google Scholar
Andersen, F.G. (1985). “Pompeian Painting. Some Practical Aspects of Creation,” Analecta Romana Instituti Danici 14: 113–128.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. (1962). “Der Zyklus der Odysseefresken im Vatikan,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 69: 106–117.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. (1969). “Säle der Stuckreliefs und Malereien der Villa Farnesina,” in Speier, H. and Helbig, W. (eds.), Führer durch die öffentlichen Sammlungen klassischer Altertümer in Rom, III: Die Staatlichen Sammlungen. Museo Nazionale Romano (Thermenmuseum), Museo Nazionale di Villa Giulia. 4th edn., Tübingen, 430–452.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. (2011). Apelles von Kolophon: Das Telephosbild aus Herculanum im antiken und modernen Kunsturteil. Mainz.Google Scholar
Andreae, B. (2014). Aphrodite, Hera und Heroen: Adaptionen griechischer Meisterwerke der Malerei in römisch-kampanischen Wandgemälden. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2006). “Parole e contesto nel discorso pliniano sull’imitazione artistica,” Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti 17: 555–572.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2007). “Retaining the Function: Sacred Copies in Greek and Roman Art,” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 51: 98–107.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2011). Intimità a Pompei. Riservatezza, condivisione, e prestigio negli ambienti ad alcova di Pompei. Berlin.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2012a). Difficillima imitatio: immagine e lessico delle copie tra Grecia e Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (ed.) (2012b). Privata Luxuria: Towards an Archaeology of Intimacy: Pompeii and Beyond. Munich.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2014). “Remembering with Greek Masterpieces: Observations on Memory and Roman Copies,” in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor, 117–126.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1995). “Aristotle on Memory and the Self,” in Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A.O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s ‘De Anima’. Oxford, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, W.C. (1981). The Paintings of the Casa dei Vettii in Pompeii, PhD dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Archer, W.C. (1990). “The Paintings in the Alae of the Casa dei Vettii and a Definition of the Fourth Pompeian Style,” American Journal of Archaeology 94: 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, W.C. (1994). “The Maturing of the Fourth Style: The Casa delle Nozze d’Argento at Pompeii,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 7: 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argentieri, L. (2007). “Meleager and Philip as Epigram Collectors,” in Bing, P. and Bruss, J.S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden, 147–164.Google Scholar
Ashby, T. (1914). “Drawings of Ancient Paintings in English Collections,” Papers of the British School at Rome 7: 1–62.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1959). “Figura,” in Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. New York, 11–76.Google Scholar
Aurigemma, S. (1953). “Il ciclo iliaco dipinto nel criptoportico della Casa del Criptoportico od Omerica,” in Spinazzola, (1953), Pompeii alla luce degli scavi nuovi di via dell’Abbondanza, 903–970.Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Bastianini, G. (eds.) (2002). Posidippi pellaei quae supersunt omnia. Milan.Google Scholar
Austin, R.G. (1944). “Quintilian on Painting and Statuary,” Classical Quarterly 38: 17–26.Google Scholar
Austin, R.G. (1977). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos, Liber Sextus: With a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Azoulay, V. (2017). The Tyrant-Slayers of Ancient Athens: A Tale of Two Statues. Trans. J. Lloyd. New York.Google Scholar
Bachmann, C. (2015). Wenn man die Welt als Gemälde betrachtet. Studien zu den Eikones Philostrats des Älteren. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Baier, T. (2010). “Eumolpe et Encolpe dans une galerie d’art,” in Prioux, É. and Rouveret, A. (eds.), Métamorphoses du regard ancien. Paris, 191–204.Google Scholar
Baldassarre, I., Pontrandolfo, A., Rouveret, A., and Salvadori, M. (2006). La pittura romana: dall’ellenismo al tardo-antico. Milan.Google Scholar
Balensiefen, L. (1990). Die Bedeutung des Spiegelbildes als ikonographisches Motiv in der antiken Kunst. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Bann, S. (1989). The True Vine: Visual Representation and the Western Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baraz, Y. and van den Berg, C.S. (eds.) (2013). Intertextuality. Special Issue of American Journal of Philology 134: 1–148.Google Scholar
Barbanera, M. (2011). Originale e copia nell’arte antica: origine, sviluppo e prospettive di un paradigma interpretativo. Mantua.Google Scholar
Barbet, A. and Verbanck-Piérard, A. (eds.) (2013). La villa romaine de Boscoreale e ses fresques. Arles.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001). Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London.Google Scholar
Barkan, L. (1999). Unearthing the Past: Archaeology and Aesthetics in the Making of Renaissance Culture. New Haven.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.E. (2011). Egyptianizing Figurines from Delos: A Study in Hellenistic Religion. Leiden.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.E. (2017). “Recontextualizing Nilotic Scenes: Interactive Landscapes in the Garden of the Casa dell’Efebo, Pompeii,” American Journal of Archaeology 121: 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, F. (2007). “Walking on Water: Cosmic Floors in Antiquity and the Middle Ages,” The Art Bulletin 89: 627–656.Google Scholar
Barry, F. (2011). “A Whiter Shade of Pale: Relative and Absolute White in Roman Sculpture and Architecture.” in Clerbois, S. and Droth, M. (eds.), Revival and Invention: Sculpture through Its Material Histories. Bern, 31–62.Google Scholar
Bastet, F. and De Vos, M. (1979). Proposta per una classificazione del terzo stile pompeiano. The Hague.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. (2011). Bilder Schreiben: Virtuose Ekphrasis in Philostrats ‘Eikones’. Berlin.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. (1954). Reflections on Poetry: Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. (1979). “The Development of the Roman Stage: A Missing Link Restored,” Theatre Research International 5: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beacham, R., Baker, D., Blazeby, M., and Denard, H. (2013). “The Digital Visualisation of the Villa at Boscoreale,” in Barbet and Verbanck-Piérard (2013), 165–195.Google Scholar
Beagan, M. (2013). “Labores pro Bono Publico: The Burdensome Mission of Pliny’s Natural History,” in Woolf, G. and König, J. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge, 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. (1994). “The Roman and the Foreign: The Cult of the ‘Great Mother’ in Imperial Rome,” in Thomas, N. and Humphrey, C. (eds.), Shamanism, History and the State. Ann Arbor, 164–190.Google Scholar
Bek, L. (1993). “From Eye-Sight to View-Planning: The Notion of Greek Philosophy and Hellenistic Optics as a Trend in Roman Aesthetics and Building Practice,” in Guldager Bilde, P., Nielsen, I., and Nielsen, M. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenism in Italy: Towards a Cultural Unity? Copenhagen, 127–143.Google Scholar
Belting, H. (2011a). An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body. Trans. T. Dunlop. Princeton.Google Scholar
Belting, H. (2011b). Florence and Baghdad: Renaissance Art and Arab Science. Trans. D.L. Schneider. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (2007). “Unpacking My Library,” in Arendt, H. (ed.), Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1994). “The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii,” The Art Bulletin 76: 225–256.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1995). “Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 79–120.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1996). “The Pregnant Moment: Tragic Wives in the Roman Interior,” in Kampen, N. (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art. Cambridge, 199–218.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1999). “Rhythms of Recognition: Mythological Encounters in Roman Landscape Painting,” in de Angelis, F. and Muth, S. (ed.), Im Spiegel des Mythos: Bilderwelt und Lebenswelt. Wiesbaden, 81–107.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (2007). “A Painted Garland: Weaving Words and Images in the House of the Epigrams in Pompeii,” in Newby, Z. and Leader-Newby, R.E. (eds.), Art and Inscriptions in the Ancient World. Cambridge, 60–101.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (2008). “Staging the Supernatural: Interior Gardens of Pompeian Houses,” in Mattusch, C.C. (2008), 53–69.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (2014). “The Concept of Boundary in the Roman Garden.” in Coleman, K. (ed.), Le jardin dans l’antiquite. Vandoeuvres, 245–300.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B., De Caro, S., Mertens, J.R., and Meyer, R. (2010). Roman Frescoes from Boscoreale: The Villa of Publius Fannius Synistor in Reality and Virtual Reality. New Haven.Google Scholar
Berry, J. (2016). “Boundaries and Control in the Roman House,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 31: 125–141.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2012). Vertere: un’antropologia della traduzione nella cultura antica. Turin.Google Scholar
Beyen, H.G. (1938–1960). Die pompejanische Wanddekoration vom zweiten bis zum vierten Stil. 2 vols. The Hague.Google Scholar
Beyen, H.G. (1948). “Les domini de la Villa de la Farnésine,” in Studia varia C.W. Vollgraff a discipulis oblata. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Beyen, H.G. (1956). “A propos of the ‘Villa Suburbana’ (‘Villa Imperiale’) near the Porta Marina at Pompeii,” Bulletin antieke beschaving 31: 54–57.Google Scholar
Bianchi, B. (2009). “‘Ma in verità non c’è gloria se non per gli artisti che dipinsero quadri …’ (Plinio il Vecchio, Naturalis Historia 35, 118),” in La Rocca, E., Ensoli, S., Tortorella, S., and Papini, M. (eds.), Roma: la pittura di un impero. Milan, 137–147.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. (1928). “Der Mysteriensaal der Villa Item,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 43: 298–330.Google Scholar
Bilde, P.G. (1993). “The International Style: Aspects of Pompeian First Style and Its Eastern Equivalents,” in Nielsen, M., Nielsen, I., and Bilde, P.G. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenism in Italy: Towards a Cultural Unity? Copenhagen, 151–177.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2005). “The Politics and Poetics of Geography in the Milan Posidippus, Section One: On Stones (AB 1–20),” in Gutzwiller (2005), 119–140.Google Scholar
Blanck, H. and Weber-Lehmann, C. (eds.) (1987). Malerei der Etrusker in Zeichnungen des 19. Jahrhunderts. Mainz.Google Scholar
Blanckenhagen, P.H.v. (1957). “Narration in Hellenistic and Roman Art,” American Journal of Archaeology 61: 78–83.Google Scholar
Blanckenhagen, P.H. (1963). “The Odyssey Frieze,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 70: 100–146.Google Scholar
Blanckenhagen, P.H. (1968). “Daedalus and Icarus on Pompeian Walls,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 75: 106–143.Google Scholar
Blanckenhagen, P.H.v. and Alexander, C. (1990). The Augustan Villa at Boscotrecase. Mainz.Google Scholar
Bloch, D. (2007). Aristotle on Memory and Recollection: Text, Translation, Interpretation, and Reception in Western Scholasticism. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bonnet, H. (1961). “Herkunft und Bedeutung der naophoren Statue,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Abteilung Kairo 17: 91–98.Google Scholar
Borbein, A. (1975). “Zur Bedeutung von Scherwand und Durchblick auf den Wandgemälden des 2. Pompejanischen Stils,” in Andreae, B. and Kyrieleis, H. (eds.), Neue Forschungen in Pompeji und den anderen vom Vesuvausbruch 79 n. Chr. verschütteten Städten. Recklinghausen, 61–71.Google Scholar
Borello, L. and Musatti, G. (2009). “La casa di Augusto sul Palatino: Il recupero e il restauro della decorazione pittorica,” Bolletino d’Arte 94: 1–116.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. (2004). Mother of the Gods: From Cybele to the Virgin Mary. Trans. L. Hochroth. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Bounia, A. (2004). The Nature of Classical Collecting. Collectors and Collecting, 100 BCE–100 CE. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. (2014). “Roman Painting in the Republic and Early Empire,” in Pollitt, J.J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge, 302–369.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. and De Vos, M. (1982). Museo Nazionale Romano, II: Le pitture, 1: Le decorazioni della villa romana della Farnesina. Rome.Google Scholar
Brendel, O.J. (1930). “Immolatio boum,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 45: 196–226.Google Scholar
Brendel, O.J. (1935). “Novus Mercurius,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 50: 231–259.Google Scholar
Brendel, O.J. (1953). “Prolegomena to a Book on Roman Art,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 21: 7–73.Google Scholar
Brendel, O.J. (1980). “The Great Frieze in the Villa of the Mysteries,” in The Visible Idea. Interpretations of Classical Art. Washington, DC, 90–138.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. (1982). “I piedistalli del giardino di Boboli: spolia in se, spolia in re,” Prospettiva 31: 2–17.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. (1984). Visual Narratives. Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. and Kinney, D. (eds.) (2011). Reuse Value: Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture, from Constantine to Sherrie Levine. Farnham.Google Scholar
Brunnsåker, S. (1971). The Tyrant-Slayers of Kritios and Nesiotes: A Critical Study of the Sources and Restorations. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Bruno, V.J. (1969). “Antecedents of the Pompeian First Style,” American Journal of Archaeology 73: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, V.J. (1985). Hellenistic Painting Techniques. The Evidence of the Delos Fragments. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bruno, V.J. (1993). “Mark Rothko and the Second Style: The Art of the Color Field in Roman Murals,” in Scott, R. and Reynolds, A. (eds.), Eius virtutis studiosi: Classical and Postclassical Studies in Memory of Frank Edward Brown (1908–1988). Washington, DC, 235–255.Google Scholar
Bryson, N. (1990). Looking at the Overlooked: Four Essays on Still Life Painting. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buchanan, S. (2012). “Representing Medea on Roman Sarcophagi: Contemplating a Paradox,” Ramus 41: 144–160.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1977). “Air-Imprints or Eidola: Democritus’ Aetiology of Vision,” Illinois Classical Studies 2: 97–109.Google Scholar
Burlot, D. (2011). “The Disegni intagliati: A Forgotten Book Illustrating the First Discoveries at Herculaneum.” The Journal of the History of Collections 23:15–28.Google Scholar
Bussels, S. (2012). The Animated Image: Roman Theory on Naturalism, Vividness and Divine Power. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büttner, S. (2006). Antike Ästhetik: eine Einführung in die Prinzipien des Schönen. Munich.Google Scholar
de Azevedo, Cagiano, M. (1949). “Il restauro degli affreschi della Casa di Livia,” Bollettino d’arte del Ministero per i beni culturali e ambientali 34: 145–149.Google Scholar
Calandra, E. (2011). The Ephemeral and the Eternal: The Pavilion of Ptolemy Philadelphos in the Court of Alexandria. Trans. S. A. Burgess. Athens.Google Scholar
Capasso, M. (2010). “Who Lived in the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum – A Settled Question?” in Zarmakoupi (2010), 89–114.Google Scholar
Carandini, A. and Bruno, D. (2008). La Casa di Augusto: dal ‘Lupercalia’ Al Natale. Bari.Google Scholar
Carandini, A., Bruno, D., and Fraioli, F. (2010). Le case del potere nell’antica Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Carettoni, G. (1983a). “La decorazione pittorica della casa di Augusto sul Palatino,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 90: 373–419.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2003). Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Carlé, M. (2007). “Zeit des Mediums: Die Genese des Medienbegriffs in griechischen Denken,” in Kittler, F. and Ofak, A. (eds.), Medien vor den Medien. Munich, 31–59.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1990). The Logic of the Cultural Sciences: Five Studies. Trans. S. G. Lofts. New Haven.Google Scholar
Castriota, D. (1992). Myth, Ethos, and Actuality: Official Art in Fifth-Century B.C.Athens. Madison.Google Scholar
Cheetham, M.A. (2009). “Theory Reception: Panofsky, Kant, and Disciplinary Cosmopolitanism,” Journal of Art Historiography 1: 1–13.Google Scholar
Childs, W. (2005). “Stil als Inhalt statt als Künstlersignatur,” in Strocka (2005b), 235–244.Google Scholar
Ciarallo, A. (2012). “Gli elementi vegetali raffigurati negli affreschi della Casa della Venere in Conchiglia,” Rivista di Studi Pompeiani 23: 25–18.Google Scholar
Ciardiello, R. (2006). “VI 17 Insula Occidentalis 42 Casa del Bracciale d’Oro,” in Aoyagi, M. and Pappalardo, U. (eds.), Pompei (Regiones VI-VII) Insula Occidentalis. Naples, 69–256.Google Scholar
Cicirelli, C. (1999). “Il complesso di pitture e pavimenti di II stile della villa 6 di Terzigno,” in Docter, R.F. and Moormann, E.M. (eds.), Proceedings of the XVth Congress of Classical Archaeology. Amsterdam, 118–122.Google Scholar
Cicirelli, C. (2003). “Terzigno. La Villa 6,” in Mastroroberto, M., d’D’Ambrosio, A, and Guzzo, P.G. (eds.), Storie da un’eruzione: Pompei, Ercolano, Oplontis. Milan, 214–220.Google Scholar
Cima, M. and La Rocca, E. (eds.) (1998). Horti Romani: Atti del convegno internazionale. Roma 4–6 maggio 1995. Rome.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.R. (1991). The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 BC–AD 250: Ritual, Space, and Decoration. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.R. (1998). Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.R. (2003). Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans: Visual Representation and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 315. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.R. (2005). “Augustan Domestic Interiors: Propaganda or Fashion?” in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge, 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J.R. (2010). “Model-Book, Outline-Book, Figure-Book: New Observations on the Creation of Near-Exact Copies in Romano-Campanian Painting,” in Bragantini, I. (ed.), Atti del X Congresso Internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour le Peinture Murale Antique) Napoli 17–21 Settembre 2007. Naples, 203–214.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.R. (2014). Oplontis Villa A (“of Poppea”) at Torre Annunziata, Italy. Vol. 1, The Ancient Setting and Modern Rediscovery. New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.R. and Gazda, E. (eds.) (2016). Leisure and Luxury in the Age of Nero: The Villas of Oplontis near Pompeii. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Closterman, W.E. (2007). “Family Ideology and Family History: The Function of Funerary Markers in Classical Attic Peribolos Tombs,” American Journal of Archaeology 111: 633–652.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1989). “La casa dell’aristocrazia romana secondo Vitruvio,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J.J. (eds.), Munus non ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture, Leiden, 20–23 January 1987. Leiden, 178–187.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1996a). “La pompé di Tolomeo Filadelfo e il mosaico nilotico di Palestrina,” in Revixit ars: arte e ideologia a Roma, dai modelli ellenistici alla tradizione repubblicana. Rome, 102–137.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1996b). “Il complesso pompeiano del Campo Marzio e la sua decorazione scultorea,” in Revixit ars: arte e ideologia a Roma, dai modelli ellenistici alla tradizione repubblicana. Rome, 360–381.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1998). “The Odyssey frescoes of the Via Graziosa: a proposed context,” Papers of the British School at Rome 66: 21–37.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2007). Rome and Environs: An Archaeological Guide. Trans. J.J. Clauss and D.P. Harmon. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2011). Le origini di Roma: la cultura artistica dalle origini al III secolo a.C. Milan.Google Scholar
Cohen, B. (2006). The Colors of Clay: Special Techniques in Athenian Vases. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, ed. Segal, C.. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Conte, G.B. (2017). Stealing the Club from Hercules: On Imitation in Latin Poetry. Berlin.Google Scholar
Conticello, B. (ed.) (1989). Italienische Reise: pompejanische Bilder in den deutschen archäologischen Sammlungen = Italienische Reise: immagini pompeiane nelle raccolte archeologiche germaniche. Naples.Google Scholar
Cooley, A.E. (2009). Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Text, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1999) Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, K. (2007). “Closely Watched Households: Visibility, Exposure, and Private Power in the Roman Domus,” Past and Present 197: 3–33.Google Scholar
Corlaita Scagliarini, D. (1974). “Spazio e decorazione nella pittura pompeiana,” Palladio 23–25: 3–44.Google Scholar
Crawley, P. (2016). “Crystalline Aesthetics and the Classical Concept of the Medium.” West 86th 23: 220–251.Google Scholar
Croisille, J.-M. (1965). Les natures mortes campaniennes: Répertoire descriptif des peintures de nature morte du Musée National de Naples, de Pompéi, Herculaneum et Stabies. Brussels.Google Scholar
Da Costa Kaufmann, T. (2001). “Antiquarianism, the History of Objects, and the History of Art before Winckelmann,” Journal of the History of Ideas 62: 523–541.Google Scholar
Dacos, N. (1969). La découverte de la Domus Aurea et la formation des grotesques à la Renaissance. Leiden.Google Scholar
Daehner, J. and Lapatin, K. (eds.) (2015). Power and Pathos: Bronze Sculpture of the Hellenistic World. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
D’Alconzo, P. (2002). Picturae excisae: conservazione e restauro dei dipinti ercolanesi e pompeiani tra XVIII e XIX secolo. Rome.Google Scholar
Dardenay, A. (2013). “Rome, les romains et l’art grec. Translatio, interpretatio, imitatio, aemulatio,” in Bonnet, C. and Bouchet, F. (eds.), Translatio: Traduire et adapter les Anciens. Paris, 109–125.Google Scholar
Darwall-Smith, R. (1996). Emperors and Architecture: A Study of Flavian Rome. Brussels.Google Scholar
Daszewski, W. (1977). La mosaïque de Thésée: Études sur les mosaïques avec représentations du labyrinthe, de Thésée et de Minotaure. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Daut, R. (1984). “Belli Facies et Triumphus,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 91: 115–123.Google Scholar
Davis, W. (1996). “Winckelmann Divided,” in Replications: Archaeology, Art History, Psychoanalysis. University Park, 257–265.Google Scholar
de Angelis, F. (2008). “Pliny the Elder and the Identity of Roman Art,” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 53/54: 79–92.Google Scholar
De Carolis, E., et al. (2012). “Riflessioni sul quadro della ‘Venere in Conchiglia’ di Pompei dal mito al lavoro dei pictores,” Rivista di Studi Pompeiani 23: 7–24.Google Scholar
de Cesare, M. (1994). “Una statua di Eracle tra mito ed escatologia: per una lettura unitaria del cratere apulo di New York MMA 50.11.4,” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti 9: 247–258.Google Scholar
de Cesare, M. (1997). Le statue in immagine: Studi sulle raffigurazioni di statue nella pittura vascolare greca. Rome.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. (2011). “The Shield of Achilles: From Metalepsis to Mise en Abyme,” Ramus 40: 1–14.Google Scholar
de Simone, G.F. (2006). “VI 17 Insula Occidentalis 41,” in Aoyagi, M. and Pappalardo, U. (eds.), Pompei (Regiones VI–VII) Insula Occidentalis. Naples, 43–68.Google Scholar
De Vos, M. (1977). “Primo stile figurato e maturo quarto stile negli scarichi provenienti dalle macerie del terremoto del 62 d.C. a Pompei,” Mededelingen van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 39: 29–47.Google Scholar
De Vos, M. (1980). L’Egittomania in pitture e mosaici romano-campani della prima età imperiale. Leiden.Google Scholar
Decultot, E. (2000). Johann Joachim Winckelmann: enquête sur la genèse de l’histoire de l’art. Paris.Google Scholar
Denard, H. and Beacham, R.C. (2003). “The Pompey Project: Digital Research and Virtual Reconstruction of Rome’s First Theatre,” Computers and the Humanities 37: 129–139.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1987). The Truth in Painting. Trans. G. Bennington and I. McLeod. Chicago.Google Scholar
Dilthey, C. (1876). “Dipinti pompeiani accompagnati d’epigrammi greci,” Annali dell’Istituto di corrispondenza archeologica 48: 294–317.Google Scholar
Donahue, A.A. (1995). “Winckelmann’s History of Art and Polyclitus,” in Moon, W.G. (ed.), Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition. Madison, 327–353.Google Scholar
Donati, A. (ed.) (1998). Romana pictura: la pittura romana dalle origini all’età bizantina. Milan.Google Scholar
Donderer, M. (1995). “Zu den Häusern des Kaiser Augustus,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 107: 621–660.Google Scholar
Donderer, M. (1997). “Bildhauersignaturen auf griechischer Rundplastik,” Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Instituts 65: 87–104.Google Scholar
Donderer, M. (2004). “Antike Bildhauersignaturen – wo man sie nicht erwarten würde,” Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Instituts 73: 81–96.Google Scholar
Donderer, M. (2008). “Antike Musterbücher und (k)ein Ende: Ein neuer Papyrus und die Aussage der Mosaiken,” Musiva et Sectilia 2–3: 81–113.Google Scholar
Doxiadis, E. (1995). The Mysterious Fayum Portraits: Faces from Ancient Egypt. New York.Google Scholar
Drerup, H. (1959). “Bildraum und Realraum in der römischen Architektur,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 66: 147–174.Google Scholar
Dubois-Pelerin, E. (2008). Le luxe privé à Rome et en Italie au Ier siècle après J.–C. Naples.Google Scholar
Duro, P. (ed.) (1996). The Rhetoric of the Frame: Essays on the Boundaries of the Artwork. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1984). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Ehlich, W. (1953). Bild und Rahmen im Altertum: Die Geschichte des Bilderrahmens. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ehlich, W. (1977). “Die griechische Tafelmalerei und das Entstehen der Pinakotheken,” Das Altertum 23: 110–119.Google Scholar
Ehlich, W. (1978). “Zur Entstehung der römischen Bildersammlungen,” Das Altertum 24: 167–176.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, W. (1987). Stilgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an römischen Wandmalereien: von der späten Republik bis zur Zeit Neros. Mainz.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, W. (1991). “Bild und Ausblick in Wandbemalungen zweiten Stils,” Antike Kunst 34: 28–65.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1995). Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1998). Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph: The Art of the Roman Empire AD 100–450. Oxford.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2000). “Making Myth Visual: The Horae of Philostratus and the Dance of the Text,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 107: 253–276.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2006). “Classicism in Roman Art,” in Porter, J.I. (ed.), Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greco-Roman Antiquity. Princeton, 270–297.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2017). “Visual Ontologies: Style, Archaism, and Framing in the Construction of the Sacred in the Western Tradition,” in Platt and Squire (2017a), 457–499.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., Alcock, S.E., and Cherry, J.F. (eds.) (2001). Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Engemann, J. (1967). Architekturdarstellungen des frühen zweiten Stils. Illusionistische römische Wandmalerei der ersten Phase und ihre Vorbilder in der realen Architektur. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Eristov, H. (1979). “Corpus des faux-marbres peints a Pompéi,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 91: 693–771.Google Scholar
Eristov, H. (1987). “Peinture romaine et textes antiques: informations et ambiguités à propos du «Recueil Milliet»,” Revue Archéologique 1: 109–123.Google Scholar
Esch, A. (1969). “Spolien. Zur Wiederverwendung antiker Baustücke und Skulpturen im mittelalterlichen Italien,” Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 51: 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, D. (2009). Le officine pittoriche di IV stile a Pompei: dinamiche produttive ed economico-sociali. Rome.Google Scholar
Esposito, D. (2010). “Disegno e creazione delle immagini nella pittura romana,” in Bragantini, I. (ed.), Atti del X Congresso Internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour le Peinture Murale Antique) Napoli 17–21 Settembre 2007. Naples, 215–226.Google Scholar
Esposito, D. (2011). “Il sistema economico e produttivo della pittura romana: esempi dall’area vesuviana,” in Monteix, N. and Tran, N. (eds.), Les savoirs professionnels des gens de métier: Études sur le monde du travail dans les sociétés urbaines de l’empire romain. Naples, 65–85.Google Scholar
Esposito, D. (2013). “Le pitture della Villa dei Papiri ad Ercolano,” in Barbet and Verbanck-Piérard (2013), 210–225.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F. (2001). “La ricerca di opere d’arte nell III e II secolo a.C. come momento per una definizione di ‘classicità’,” in Fabbrini, F. (ed.), Maecenas: Il collezionismo nel mondo romano dall’età degli Scipioni a Cicerone. Arezzo, 13–46.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H.R. (1929). Horace. Satires. Epistles. The Art of Poetry. Loeb Classical Library 194. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2001). Latin Language and Latin Culture: From Ancient to Modern Times. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007). Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. (1999). “The Geography of Time: The Nile Mosaic and the Library at Praeneste,” Ostraka 8: 359–386.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. (2013). “History and Its Margins in the Pictorial Narrative of the Nile Mosaic at Praeneste,” in Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B., and Kirichenko, A. (eds.), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art. Heidelberg, 129–142.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1988). Philhellénisme et impérialisme. Aspects idéologiques de la conquête romaine du monde hellénistique, de la seconde guerre de Macédoine à la guerre contre Mithridate. Rome.Google Scholar
Fiorelli, G. (1860). Pompeianarum antiquitatum historia quam ex cod. mss. et a schedis diurnisque R. Alcubierre, C. Weber, M. Cixia, I. Corcoles, I. Perez-Conde, F. et P. La Vega, R. Amicone, A Ribav, M. Arditi, N.D’Apuzzo ceteror. Naples.Google Scholar
Flory, M.B. (1984). “Sic Exempla Parantur: Livia’s Shrine to Concordia and the Porticus Liviae,” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 33: 309–330.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2003). ‘Utraque Lingua’: A Bibliography on Bi- and Multilingualism in Graeco-Roman Antiquity and in Modern Times. Essen.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2005). “The Transformation of Greek Scientific Knowledge by Roman Technical Writers: On the Translating of Technical Texts in Antiquity,” Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption 15: 91–114.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2009). Wissen, Kommunikation und Selbstdarstellung. Zur Struktur und Charakteristik römischer Fachtexte der frühen Kaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Foster, H., Krauss, R., Bois, Y.-A., Buchloh, B., and Joselit, D. (2011). Art since 1900: Modernism, Antimodernism, Postmodernism. New York.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997). “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies,” Materiali e discussioni 39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fragaki, H. (2008). “Des « topia » à l’utopie: le rôle de l’Égypte dans la peinture paysagiste romaine,” Antike Kunst 51: 96–122.Google Scholar
Francis, J. (2009). “Metal Maidens, Achilles’ Shield and Pandora: The Beginnings of ‘Ekphrasis’,” American Journal of Philology 130: 1–23.Google Scholar
Frazel, T.D. (2005). “Furtum and the Description of Stolen Objects in Cicero In Verrem 2.4,” The American Journal of Philology 126: 363–376.Google Scholar
Frazer, J.G. and Goold, G.P. (1996). Ovid. Fasti. Loeb Classical Library 253. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frederick, D. (1995). “Beyond the Atrium to Ariadne: Erotic Painting and Visual Pleasure in the Roman House,” Classical Antiquity 14: 266–268.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, R. (2010). “Plaster Casts in Antiquity,” in Frederiksen, R. and Marchand, E. (eds.), Plaster Casts Making, Collecting, and Displaying from Classical Antiquity to the Present. Berlin, 13–34.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2001). Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fröhlich, T. (1991). Lararien- und Fassadenbilder in den Vesuvstädten: Untersuchungen zur ‘volkstümlichen’ pompejanischen Malerei. Mainz.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M. (1987). Untersuchungen zur Ausstattung römischer Theater in Italien und den Westprovinzen des Imperium Romanum. Mainz.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M. (2013). “Figures géométriques à la Maison d’Auguste sur le Palatin,” in Fuchs, M., Sylvestre, R., and Heidenreich, C.S. (eds.), Inscriptions mineures: nouveautés et réflexions: actes du premier colloque Ductus (19–20 juin 2008, Université de Lausanne). Bern, 229–240.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, H. (1931). Philoxenos von Eretria. Archäologische Untersuchungen über zwei Alexandermosaike. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Fujisawa, N. (1974). “ Ἔχειν, Μετέχειν, and Idioms of ‘Paradeigmatism’ in Plato’s Theory of Forms,” Phronesis 19: 30–58.Google Scholar
Fullerton, M. (1997). “Imitation and Intertextuality in Roman Art,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 427–440.Google Scholar
Fulton, C. (2016). Lost in Transportation: Trade Networks and the Materiality of Cargoes in the Ancient Mediterranean. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1993). “Democritus and Epicurus on Sensible Qualities,” in Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge, 72–94.Google Scholar
Fusconi, G. and Moteldo, A. (1997). “Pier-Leone Ghezzi, un incisore ignoto e l’edizione delle Camere sepolcrali,” in Debendetti, E. (ed.), Settecento disegnatore. Incisione progetti e caricature. Rome, 141–160.Google Scholar
Gahtan, M.W. and Pegazzano, D. (eds.) (2015). Museum Archetypes and Collecting in the Ancient World. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Gaifman, M. (2017). “Framing Divine Bodies in Greek Art,” in Platt and Squire (2017a), 392–423.Google Scholar
Galsterer, H. (1994). “Kunstraub und Kunsthandel im republikanischen Rom,” in Hellenkemper Salies (1994), 857–866.Google Scholar
Garbrah, K.A. (1988). “Notes on Inscriptions from Chios II,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 73: 73–74.Google Scholar
Gass, W.H. (1970). “Philosophy and the Form of Fiction.” in Fiction and the Figures of Life. Boston. 3–26.Google Scholar
Gasser, A. (1982). Die Klapptürbilder in der römisch-pompejanischen Wandmalerei, PhD Dissertation, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Gazda, E.K. (ed.) (2002). The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Gee, R. (2014). “Fourth Style Responses to ‘Period Rooms’ of the Second and Third Styles at Villa A (‘of Poppea’) at Oplontis,” in Zimmermann, N. (ed.), Antike Malerei zwischen Lokalstil und Zeitstil. Akten des XI. internationalen Kolloquiums der AIPMA. Vienna, 89–96.Google Scholar
Gee, R. (2015). “Fourth Style Workshop Deployment and Movement Patterns at Villa A (‘of Poppaea’) at Oplontis,” in Lepinski, S. and McFadden, S. (eds.), Beyond Iconography: Materials, Methods, and Meaning in Ancient Surface Decoration. Selected Papers on Ancient Art and Architecture, 1. Boston, 113–134.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (2008). The First Hall of Fame: A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gell, A. (1992). The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. New York.Google Scholar
Gell, W. (1832). Pompeiana: The Topography, Edifices and Ornaments of Pompeii. London.Google Scholar
Gensheimer, M. (2015). “Greek and Roman Images of Art and Architecture,” in Marconi, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture. Oxford, 84–104.Google Scholar
Ghedini, F., Colpo, I., and Novello, M. (eds.) (2004). Le immagine di Filostrato Minore: La prospettiva dello storico dell’arte. Rome.Google Scholar
Ghedini, F. and Salvo, G. (2015). “Private Art Galleries in Roma: Literary and Archaeological Evidence,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano (2015), 109–117.Google Scholar
Giovenale, G.B. (1929). “Un epigramma di Marziale e le ultime scoperte al Foro di Augusto,” Atti del Congresso Nazionale di Studi Romani 1: 110–116.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. (2006). “Die unmöglichen Bilder des Philostrat. Ein antiker Beitrag zur Paragone-Debatte?” Pegasus 8: 91–116.Google Scholar
Giuliani, L. (2013). Image and Myth: A History of Pictorial Narration in Greek Art. Trans. J. O’Donnell. Chicago.Google Scholar
Glinister, F., Woods, C., North, J.A., and Crawford, M.H. (eds.) (2007). Verrius, Festus, and Paul: Lexicography, Scholarship, and Society. London.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2012). “Cicero’s Remarks on Translating Philosophical Terms – Some General Problems,” in Glucker, J. and Burnett, C. (eds.), Greek into Latin from Antiquity until the Nineteenth Century. London, 37–96.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.M. (2005). Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and Its Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1994). “The Naïve and Knowing Eye: Ecphrasis and the Culture of Viewing in the Hellenistic World,” in Goldhill and Osborne (1994), 197–223.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2017). “Is This Reperformance?” in Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds.), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. Cambridge, 283–301.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.) (1994). Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldman, B. (1999). “The Kerch Easel Painter,” Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 62: 28–44.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E.H. (2000). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton.Google Scholar
Goodman, K. (2004). Georgic Modernity and British Romanticism: Poetry and the Mediation of History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.L. (1979). “The Real and the Imaginary: Production and Religion in the Greco-Roman World,” Art History 2: 5–34.Google Scholar
Gow, A.S.F. and Page, D.L. (eds.) (1965). The Greek Anthology. Hellenistic Epigrams. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S.F. and Page, D.L. (eds.) (1968). The Greek Anthology: The Garland of Philip, and Some Contemporary Epigrams. London.Google Scholar
Graeve, V. von (1984). “Marmorbilder aus Herkulaneum und Pompeji,” Dialoghi di archeologia 2.3: 89–113.Google Scholar
Graeve, V. von and Preusser, F. (1981). “Zur Technik griechischer Malerei auf Marmor,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 96: 120–156.Google Scholar
Grahame, M. (1997). “Public and Private in the Roman House: Investigating the Social Order of the Casa del Fauno,” in Laurence, R. and Wallace-Hadrill, A. (eds.), Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and beyond. Portsmouth, 137–164.Google Scholar
Graser, E.R. (1940). “The Edict of Diocletian on Maximum Prices,” in Frank, T. (ed.), An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome. Vol V. Rome and Italy of the Empire. Baltimore, 305–321.Google Scholar
Graverini, L. (2001). “L. Mummio Acaico,” in Fabbrini, F. (ed.), Maecenas: Il collezionismo nel mondo romano dall’età degli Scipioni a Cicerone. Arezzo, 105–148.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. (1993). “Modernist Painting,” in O’Brian, J. (ed.), Clement Greenberg: The Collected Essays and Criticism. Chicago, 85–93.Google Scholar
Greenwood, L. H.G. (1928). Cicero. The Verrine Orations, Volume I: Against Caecilius. Against Verres, Part 1; Part 2, Books 1–2. Loeb Classical Library 221. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2017). Aesthetics Experiences and Classical Antiquity: The Significance of Form in Narrative and Pictures. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1973). “Hermodoros et Vitruve,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 85: 137–161.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (2008). “The Theory and Practice of Perspective in Vitruvius’ De Architectura,” in Carpo, M. and Lemerle, F. (eds.), Perspective, Projections, Design: Technologies of Architectural Representation. New York, 5–17.Google Scholar
Grüner, A. (2004). Venus Ordinis: Der Wandel von Malerei und Literatur im Zeitalter der römischen Bürgerkriege. Paderborn.Google Scholar
Gualandi, G. (1982). “Plinio e il collezionismo d’arte,” in Alfonsi, L. (ed.), Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario: atti del convegno di Como, 5–7 ottobre 1979: atti della tavola rotonda nella ricorrenza centenaria della morte di Plinio il Vecchio, Bologna 16 dicembre 1979. Como, 259–298.Google Scholar
Guidobaldi, M.P. and Esposito, D. (2010). “New Archaeological Research at the Villa of the Papyri,” in Zarmakoupi (2010), 21–62.Google Scholar
Guidobaldi, M.P., Esposito, D., and Formisano, E. (2009). “L’Insula I, l’insula nord-occidentale e la villa dei papiri di Ercolano: una sintesi delle conoscenze alla luce delle recenti indagini archeologiche,” Vesuviana: An International Journal of Studies on Pompeii and Herculaneum 1: 43–180.Google Scholar
Gury, F. (1986). “La forge du destin. A propos d’une série de peintures pompéiennes du IVe style,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 98: 427–489.Google Scholar
Gury, F. (2010). “Le paysage idyllique sacré au bétyle de la ‘Maison de Livie’ sur le Palatin. Une évocation de la source du Nil,” in Bragantini, I. (ed.), Atti del X congresso internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour la Peinture Murale Antique): Napoli 17–21 settembre 2007. Naples, 173–186.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K.J. (2004). “Seeing Thought: Timomachus’ Medea and Ecphrastic Epigram.” American Journal of Philology 125: 339–386.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K.J. (ed.) (2005). The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. New York.Google Scholar
Habinek, T.N. (1998). The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hagen, W. (2008). “Metaxy: Eine historiosemantische Fussnote zum Medienbegriff,” in Münker, S. and Roesler, A. (eds.), Was ist ein Medium? Frankfurt am Main, 13–29.Google Scholar
Haimson Lushkov, A. (2015). Magistracy and the Historiography of the Roman Empire. Politics in Prose. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hales, S. (2008). “Aphrodite and Dionysus: Greek Role Models for Roman Homes?” in Bell, S. and Hansen, I.L. (eds.), Role Models in the Roman World: Identity and Assimilation. Ann Arbor, 235–255.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2002). “The Phillipics,” in May, J.M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden, 273–304.Google Scholar
Hallett, C.H. (1995). “Kopienkritik and the Works of Polykleitos,” in Moon, W.G. (ed.), Polykleitos. The Doryphoros and Tradition. Madison, 121–160.Google Scholar
Hallett, C.H. (2001). “Response to R. Tybout ‘Roman Wall-Painting and Social Significance’,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 14: 414–416.Google Scholar
Hallett, C.H. (2005). “Emulation vs. Replication. Redefining Roman Copying,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 18: 419–435.Google Scholar
Hallett, C.H. (2015). “Defining Roman Art,” in Borg, B. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Art. Malden, 11–33.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002). The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.F. (2003). The Eloquence of Appropriation: Prolegomena to an Understanding of Spolia in Early Christian Rome. Rome.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1985). “Imago Mundi: Cosmological and Ideological Aspects of the Shield of Achilles.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 11–31.Google Scholar
Harloe, K. (2010). “Pausanias as Historian in Winckelmann’s History,” Classical Receptions Journal 2: 174–196.Google Scholar
Harloe, K. (2013). Winckelmann and the Invention of Antiquity: History and Aesthetics in the Age of Altertumswissenschaft. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, W. (2015). “Prolegomena to a Study of the Economics of Roman Art,” American Journal of Archaeology 119: 395–417.Google Scholar
Hart, M.L. (2016). “A Portrait of a Bearded Man Flanked by Isis and Serapis,” in Heyn, M. and Steinsapir, A. (eds.), Icon, Cult, and Context: Sacred Spaces and Objects in the Classical World. Los Angeles, 79–89.Google Scholar
Haskell, F. and Penny, N. (1981). Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500–1900. New Haven.Google Scholar
Haug, A. (2001). “Constituting the Past, Forming the Present: The Role of Material Culture in the Augustan Period,” Journal of the History of Collections 13: 111–123.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2016). The Image of the Artist in Archaic and Classical Greece: Art, Poetry, and Subjectivity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heilmeyer, W.-D. (2008). “Kunst und Serie,” in Junker, Stähli, and Kunze (2008), 243–251.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. (2015). Emperors and Ancestors: Roman Rulers and the Constraints of Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Helbig, W. (1868). Wandgemälde der vom Vesuv verschütteten Städte Campaniens. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hellenkemper Salies, G. (ed.) (1994). Das Wrack: der antike Schiffsfund von Mahdia. Cologne.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1996), “Footnote: Representation in the Villa of the Mysteries,” in Elsner (1996), 235–276.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1995). “Graecia Capta: Roman Views of Greek Culture,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 243–261.Google Scholar
Heseltine, M., Rouse, W.H.D., and Warmington, E.H. (1913). Petronius, Seneca. Satyricon. Apocolocyntosis. Loeb Classical Library 15. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. (2015). The Museum of Augustus: The Temple of Apollo in Pompeii, the Portico of Philippus in Rome, and Latin Poetry. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hett, W.S. (2000). Aristotle. On the Soul; Parva Naturalia; On Breath. Loeb Classical Library 288. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Higbie, C. (2003). The Lindian Chronicle and the Greek Creation of their Past. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinterhöller-Klein, M. (2015). Varietas Topiorum: Perspektive und Raumerfassung in Landschafts- und Panoramabildern der römischen Wandmalerei vom 1. Jh. vor Chr. bis zum Ende der pompejanischen Stile. Vienna.Google Scholar
Hodske, J. (2007). Mythologische Bildthemen in den Häusern Pompejis: Die Bedeutung der zentralen Mythenbilder für die Bewohner Pompejis. Stendal.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996). “Exempla und mos maiorum. Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität,” in Gehrke, H.J. and Möller, A. (eds.), Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt. Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein. Tübingen, 301–338.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. (1990). “Time, History, and Ritual on the Ara Pacis Augustae,” The Art Bulletin 72: 542–557.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. (1997). “Roman Triumphal Painting: Its Function, Development, and Reception,” The Art Bulletin 79: 130–147.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. (2002). The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. (2005). “The Rhetoric of ‘Romanitas’: The ‘Tomb of the Statilii’ Frescoes Reconsidered,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 50: 89–129.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2004). The Language of Images in Roman Art. Trans. A. Snodgrass and A. Künzl-Snodgrass, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2006). “Greek Styles and Greek Art in Augustan Rome,” in Porter, J.I. (ed.), Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greco-Roman Antiquity. Princeton, 237–259.Google Scholar
Huber, M. (2010). Spiegelungen: Philosophisch-ästhetische Studien zur Geschichte des Bildes. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hülsen, C. (1895). “Untersuchungen zur Topographie des Palatins,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 10: 252–283.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2004). “Notes on the Lithika of Posidippus.” in Acosta-Hughes, Kosmetatou, and Baumbach (2004), 94–104.Google Scholar
Hurwit, J. (1977). “Image and Frame in Greek Art,” American Journal of Archaeology 81: 1–30.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. (2013). “Genre and Super-Genre,” in Papanghelis, T., Harrison, S.J., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions, and Transformations. Berlin, 19–34.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. (2014). Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford.Google Scholar
Iacopi, I. (1997). Palatino, Aula Isiaca: la decorazione pittorica dell’Aula Isiaca. Milan.Google Scholar
Iacopi, I. and Tedone, G. (2005). “Bibliotheca e Porticus ad Apollinis,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 112: 352–378.Google Scholar
Isager, J. (1991). Pliny on Art and Society: The Elder Pliny’s Chapters on the History of Art. Odense.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1993). The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Jashemski, W. (1993). The Gardens of Pompeii, Herculaneum and the Villas Destroyed by Vesuvius. New Rochelle.Google Scholar
Jones, F. (2016). The Boundaries of Art and Social Space in Rome: The Caged Bird and Other Art Forms. London.Google Scholar
Jones, H.L. (1929). Strabo. Geography, Volume VI: Books 13–14. Loeb Classical Library 223. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jones, N.B. (2014). “Ancient Painted Panels: Terminology and Appearance,” Mnemosyne 67: 295–304.Google Scholar
Jones, N.B. (2015). “Temple Inventory and Fictive Picture Gallery: Ancient Painting between Votive Offering and Artwork,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano (2015), 118–128.Google Scholar
Joyce, H. (1992). “Grasping at Shadows: Ancient Paintings in Renaissance and Baroque Rome,” The Art Bulletin 74: 219–246.Google Scholar
Jucker, H. (1950). Vom Verhältnis der Römer zur bildenden Kunst der Griechen. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Junker, K., Stähli, A., and Kunze, C. (eds.) (2008). Original und Kopie: Formen und Konzepte der Nachahmungen in der antiken Kunst: Akten des Kolloquiums in Berlin, 17.-19. Februar 2005. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kakoulli, I. (2009). Greek Painting Techniques and Materials from the Fourth to the First Century B.C. London.Google Scholar
Kaltsas, N.E., Vlachogianni, E., and Bouyia, P. (eds.) (2012). The Antikythera Shipwreck: The Ship, the Treasures, the Mechanism. Athens.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Guyer, P. (ed.), Trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kaschnitz von Weinberg, G. (1965). Mittelmeerische Kunst: Eine Darstellung ihrer Struktur. Ausgewählte Schriften. Berlin.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. (2017). “A Poet on the Margins: Vergil and the Theocritean Scholia,” Classical Philology 112: 456–478.Google Scholar
Kellum, B.A. (1990). “The City Adorned: Programmatic Display at the Aedes Concordiae Augustae,” in Raaflaub, K., Toher, M., and Bowersock, G. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley, 276–307.Google Scholar
Kellum, B.A. (1994). “The Construction of Landscape in Augustan Rome: The Garden Room at the Villa ad Gallinas,” The Art Bulletin 76: 211–224.Google Scholar
Kinney, D. (1998). “Spolia, damnatio and renovatio memoriae,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 42: 117–148.Google Scholar
Kirby, J.T. (1996). “Classical Greek Origins of Western Aesthetic Theory,” in Allert, B. (ed.), Languages of Visuality: Crossings between Science, Art, Politics, and Literature. Detroit, 29–45.Google Scholar
Kittler, F. (2009). “Towards an Ontology of Media,” Theory, Culture & Society 26: 23–31.Google Scholar
Klamm, S. (2010). “Neue Originale. Medienpluralität in der klassischen Archäologie des 19. Jahrhunderts,” in Bartsch, T., Becker, M., Bredekamp, H., and Schreiter, C. (eds.), Das Originale der Kopie. Kopien als Produkte und Medien der Transformation von Antike. Berlin, 47–68.Google Scholar
Knox, P. (2015). “The Literary House of Mr. Octavius Quartio,” Illinois Classical Studies 40: 171–184.Google Scholar
Koch, N. (2013). Paradeigma: Die antike Kunstschriftstellerei als Grundlage der frühneuzeitlichen Kunsttheorie. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Koch-Brinkmann, U. (1999). Polychrome Bilder auf weissgrundigen Lekythen: Zeugen der klassischen griechischen Malerei. Munich.Google Scholar
Kochs, S. (2005). Untersuchungen zu Winckelmanns Studien der antiken griechischen Literatur. Ruhpolding.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. (2013). The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. New York.Google Scholar
Krause, C. (2000). “Hemizyklien im frühkaiserlichen Villenbau,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 107: 37–48.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (2007). “The Arrangment of Epigrams in Collections,” in Bing, P. and Bruss, J.S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden, 131–146.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P.O. (1990). “The Modern System of the Arts,” in Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays. 2nd edn. Princeton, 163–227.Google Scholar
Krüger, K. (2001). Das Bild als Schleier des Unsichtbaren: Ästhetische Illusion in der Kunst der frühen Neuzeit in Italien. Munich.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (1999). “Culture and History at Pompey’s Museum,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 129: 343–373.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (2005). “Cabinet Fit for a Queen: The Λίθικα as Posidippus’ Gem Musem,” in Gutzwiller (2005), 141–163.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (1985). Amazzonomachia: le sculture frontale del tempio di Apollo Sosiano. Rome.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (1988). “Der Apollo-Sosianus Tempel,” in Hofter, M.R. (ed.), Kaiser Augustus und die verlorene Republik: Eine Ausstellung im Martin-Gropius-Bau, Berlin, 7. Juni–14. August 1988. Mainz, 121–129.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (2001). “La nuova immagine dei fori Imperiali. Appunti in margine agli scavi,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 108: 171–213.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (2008a). “Gli affreschi della casa di Augusto e della villa della Farnesina: una revisione cronologica,” in La Rocca, E., León, P., and Parisi Presicce, C. (eds.), Le due patrie acquisite: Studi di archeologia dedicate a Walter Trillmich. Rome, 223–242.Google Scholar
La Rocca, E. (2008b). Lo spazio negato: La pittura di paesaggio nella cultura artistica greca e romana. Milan.Google Scholar
La Torre, G.F. and Torelli, M. (eds.) (2011). Pittura ellenistica in Italia e in Sicilia: linguaggi e tradizioni. Atti del convegno di studi (Messina, 24–25 settembre 2009). Rome.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1996). “Ut figura poesis. Writing Art and the Art of Writing in Augustan Poetry,” in Elsner (1996), 75–102.Google Scholar
Lampela, A. (1998). Rome and the Ptolemies of Egypt: The Development of Their Political Relations, 273–80 B.C. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. (1982). Griechische Meisterwerke in römischen Abgüssen: Der Fund von Baia. Liebieghaus, Museum Alter Plastik, vom 27. Mai bis 28. August 1982. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. (1985). Die antiken Gipsabgüsse aus Baiae: griechische Bronzestatuen in Abgüssen römischer Zeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Landwehr, C. (2010). “The Baiae Casts and the Uniqueness of Roman Copies,” in Frederiksen, R. and Marchand, E. (eds.), Plaster Casts: Making, Collecting, and Displaying from Classical Antiquity to the Present. Berlin, 35–46.Google Scholar
Lauter-Bufe, H. (1969). Zur Stilgeschichte der figürlichen pompejanischen Fresken, PhD Dissertation, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Lazzeretti, A. (2015). “Verres, Cicero and Other Collectors in Late Republican Rome,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano (2015), 91–101.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W. (1981). “Metamorphoses of the Actaeon Myth,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 88: 307–327.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W. (1982). “Patrons, Painters, and Patterns. The Anonymity of Romano-Campanian Painting and the Transition from the Second to the Third Style,” in Gold, B.K. (ed.), Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin, 135–173.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W. (1988). The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Leach, E.W. (2004). The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of the Naples. New York.Google Scholar
Leader, R.E. (1997). “In Death Not Divided: Gender, Family, and State on Classical Athenian Grave Stelae,” American Journal of Archaeology 101: 683–699.Google Scholar
Lelli, E. (2004). “I gioelli di Posidippo,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 76: 127–138.Google Scholar
Lessing, J. and Mau, A. (1891). Wand- und Deckenschmuck eines römischen Hauses aus der Zeit des Augustus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ling, R. (1999). “Review. Palatino: Aula Isiaca, by I. Iacopi,” Journal of Roman Studies 89: 248.Google Scholar
Little, A.M.G. (1956). “A Roman Sourcebook for the Stage,” American Journal of Archaeology 60: 27–33.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. (2011). “Reading Spolia in Late Antiquity and Contemporary Perception,” in Brilliant and Kinney (2010), 33–52.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A.B. (1982). “The Inscription of Udjaḥorresnet: A Collaborator’s Testament,” The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 68: 166–180.Google Scholar
Lo Sardo, E. (ed.) (2008). The She-Wolf and the Sphinx: Rome and Egypt from History to Myth. Milan.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (2008). Bilder machen Räume: Mythenbilder in pompeianischen Häusern. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (2015). “Roman Painting: Up Against the Wall,” in Borg, B. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Art. Malden, 252–267.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, S. (1993). “The Pictures on Juno’s Temple in the Aeneid,” The Classical World 87: 37–49.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2007). “Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus,” in Heyworth, S. (ed.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford, 91–112.Google Scholar
Lugli, G. (1938). “La pianta dell’antica casa della Farnesina,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 55: 5–27.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. (1933). “Pompei. Studi e ricerche intorno alla Casa del Criptoportico sulla Via dell’ Abbondanza,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità: 252–276.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. (1938). “Note su di un nuovo dipinto ercolanese,” Bollettino d’arte del Ministero per i beni culturali e ambientali 31: 481–489.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. (1940). “Picturae ligneis formis inclusae. Note sulla tecnica della pittura campana,” Atti dell’Accademia dei Lincei. Rendiconti 1: 138–160.Google Scholar
Malaise, M. (1972). Les conditions de pénétration et de diffusion des cultes égyptiens en Italie. Leiden.Google Scholar
Manzo, A. (1975). “Spunti di storia dell’arte e di critica d’arte in Varrone,” Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo 109: 252–268.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. (1996). Down from Olympus. Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970. Princeton.Google Scholar
Marconi, C. (2011). “The Birth of an Image: The Painting of a Statue of Herakles and Theories of Representation in Ancient Greek Culture,” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 59–60: 145–167.Google Scholar
Marin, L. (1983). “The Iconic Text and the Theory of Enunciation: Luca Signorelli at Loreto (Circa 1479–1484).” Trans. L. Duisit. New Literary History 14: 553–596.Google Scholar
Marin, L. (1989). Opacité de la peinture: essais sur la représentation au Quattrocento. Paris.Google Scholar
Marin, L. (2001). “Ruptures, Interruptions, Syncopies in Representation in Painting,” in On Representation. Trans. C. Porter. Stanford, 373–387.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (2005). Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste: An Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (1989). “Copying in Roman Sculpture: The Replica Series,” in Preciado, K. (ed.), Retaining the Original: Multiple Originals, Copies, and Reproductions. Washington, DC, 29–45.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (1997). “Roman Sculptural Reproductions or Polykleitos: The Sequal,” in Hughes, A. and Ranfft, E. (eds.), Sculpture and Its Reproductions. London, 7–28.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (2008). The Language of the Muses: The Dialogue between Roman and Greek Sculpture. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Matheson, S.B. (1983). “A Bronze Hermes in the Polykleitan Style,” Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin 38: 14–21.Google Scholar
Mathews, T.F. (2001). “The Emperor and the Icon,” Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia 15: 163–177.Google Scholar
Mathews, T.F. and Muller, N.E. (2016). The Dawn of Christian Art in Panel Paintings and Icons. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C.C. (1980). “The Berlin Foundry Cup: The Casting of Greek Bronze Statuary in the Early Fifth Century B.C.,” American Journal of Archaeology 84: 435–444.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C.C. (1996). Classical Bronzes: The Art and Craft of Greek and Roman Statuary. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C.C. (2002). “In Search of the Greek Bronze Original,” in Gazda (2002), 99–116.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C.C. (ed.) (2008). Pompeii and the Roman Villa: Art and Culture around the Bay of Naples. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C.C. (2011). “Introduction,” in Winckelmann, J.J., Letter and Report on the Discoveries at Herculaneum. Los Angeles, 1–61.Google Scholar
Mattusch, C.C. (ed.) (2013). Rediscovering the Ancient World on the Bay of Naples, 1710–1890. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Mau, A. (1882a). “Parete dipinta della casa antica scoperta nel giardino della Farnesina,” Annali dell’Istituto di corrispondenza archeologica 54: 301–308.Google Scholar
Mau, A. (1884). “Pitture della casa antica scoperta nella Villa Farnesina,” Annali dell’Istituto di corrispondenza archeologica 56: 307–322.Google Scholar
Mau, A. (1902). “Wandschirm und Bildträger in der Wandmalerei,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 17: 179–231.Google Scholar
Mau, A. (1903). “Tafelbild oder Prospekt,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 18: 222–273.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. (2012). The Ancient Middle Classes: Urban Life and Aesthetics in the Roman Empire, 100 BCE–250 CE. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCann, A.M. (1968). The Portraits of Septimius Severus, A.D.193–211. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 30. Rome.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (2006). “Roman Aesthetics and the Spoils of Syracuse,” in Dillon, S. and Welch, K. (eds.), Representations of War in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, 68–90.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J. (2007). The Architecture of Alexandria and Egypt: 300 BC–AD 700. New Haven.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1964). “The Medium Is the Message,” in Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York, 7–21.Google Scholar
Meneghni, R. and Santangeli Valenziani, R. (2007). I fori Imperiali. I scavi del commune di Roma (1991–2007). Rome.Google Scholar
Meyboom, P. (1995a). “Famulus and the Painters’ Workshops of the Domus Aurea.” Mededelingen van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 54: 229–245.Google Scholar
Meyboom, P. (1995b). The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina: Early Evidence of Egyptian Religion in Italy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Meyboom, P. and Moormann, E.M. (2013). Le decorazioni dipinte e marmoree della Domus Aurea di Nerone a Roma. Leuven.Google Scholar
Mielsch, H. (1979). “Zur Deutung und Datierung der Knöchelspielerinnen des Alexandros,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 86: 233–248.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2002). “Cicero’s Prosecution of Gaius Verres: A Roman View of the Ethics of Acquisition of Art,” International Journal of Cultural Property 11: 28–49.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2008). Art as Plunder: The Ancient Origins of Debate about Cultural Property. New York.Google Scholar
Miller, M. (1997). Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century BC: A Study in Cultural Receptivity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, M. (2006/2007). “Persians in the Greek Imagination.” Mediterranean Archaeology 19/20: 109–123.Google Scholar
Miller, S.G. (1993). The Tomb of Lyson and Kallikles: A Painted Macedonian Tomb. Mainz.Google Scholar
Miller, S.G. (2014). “Hellenistic Painting in the Eastern Mediterranean, Mid-Fourth to Mid-First Century B.C.” in Pollitt, J.J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge, 170–237.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J.T. (1994). “Metapictures,” in Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representations. Chicago, 35–82.Google Scholar
Moholt, R. (2011). “Roman Labyrinth Mosaics and the Experience of Motion.” The Art Bulletin 93: 287–303.Google Scholar
Moignard, E. (2015). Master of Attic Black-Figure Painting: The Art and Legacy of Exekias. London.Google Scholar
Molle, C. (2014). “Graffiti dalla Regio I (Latium et Campania),” Sylloge Epigraphica Barcinonensis 12: 47–62.Google Scholar
Mols, S.T.A.M. (1999). Wooden Furniture in Herculaneum: Form, Technique and Function. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mols, S.T.A.M. and Moormann, E.M. (2008). La Villa della Farnesina: le pitture. Milan.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1950). “Ancient History and the Antiquarian,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 13: 285–315.Google Scholar
Moneti, A. (1991). “Le ville di Tiberio a Capri e la villa sotto la Farnesina: una necessaria reconsiderazione,” Rivista di archeologia 15: 89–96.Google Scholar
Moormann, E.M. (1988). La pittura parietale romana come fonte di conoscenza per la scultura antica. Assen.Google Scholar
Moormann, E.M. (1995). ‘Und dieser Esel ist hier das gelehrteste.’ Winckelmann und die Antike Wandmalerei. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Moormann, E.M. (2005). “Der römische Freskenzyklus mit grossen Figuren in der Villa 6 in Terzigno,” in Ganschow, T., Steinhart, M., Berges, D., and Fröhlich, T. (eds.), Otium: Festschrift für Volker Michael Strocka. Remshalden, 257–266.Google Scholar
Moormann, E.M. (2010a). “Wall Paintings in the Villa of the Papyri. Old and New Finds,” in Zarmakoupi (2010), 63–78.Google Scholar
Moormann, E.M. (2010b). “Castel di Guido ed il III stile a Roma,” in Bragantini, I. (ed.), Atti del X Congresso Internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour le Peinture Murale Antique) Napoli 17–21 Settembre 2007. Naples, 197–202.Google Scholar
Moormann, E.M. (2013). “Did Roman Republican Paintings Convey Political Messages? The Megalography of Terzigno and Other Second Style Paintings,” in Barbet and Verbanck-Piérard (2013), 226–235.Google Scholar
Moreno, P. (1999). “Visita di Dioniso. Rilievo Maffei al British Museum,” in Sabato in museo. Letture di arte ellenistica e romana. Milan, 86–94.Google Scholar
Moretti, J.-C. (1997). “Formes et destinations du proskénion dans les théâtres hellénistiques de Grece,” Pallas 47: 13–39.Google Scholar
Moretti, J.-C. (ed.) (2009). Fronts de scène et lieux de culte dans le théâtre antique. Lyon.Google Scholar
Morselli, C., Tortorici, E., and Alvaro, C. (1989). Curia, Forum Iulium, Forum Transitorium. Rome.Google Scholar
Murphy, T.M. (2004). Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nagel, A. and Wood, C.S. (2005). “Interventions: Toward a New Model of Renaissance Anachronism,” The Art Bulletin 87: 403–415.Google Scholar
Najbjerg, T. (2007). “From Art to Archaeology: Recontextualizing the Images from the Porticus of Herculaneum,” in Gardner Coates, V. and Seydl, J.L. (eds.), Antiquity Recovered: The Legacy of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Los Angeles, 59–72.Google Scholar
Nakamura, R. (1995). The Hediste Stele in the Context of Hellenistic Funerary Art: The Display of the Corpse of a Tragic Woman. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Nava, M.L., Paris, R., and Friggeri, R. (eds.) (2007). Rosso pompeiano: la decorazione pittorica nelle collezioni del Museo di Napoli e a Pompei. Milan.Google Scholar
Neer, R.T. (2002). Style and Politics in Athenian Vase-Painting: The Craft of Democracy, ca.530–460 B.C.E. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nelsestruen, G. (2015). Varro the Agronomist: Political Philosophy, Satire, and Agriculture in the Late Republic. Columbus.Google Scholar
Netzer, E., Kalman, Y., Porath, R., and Chacy-Laureys, R. (2010). “Preliminary Report on Herod’s Mausoleum and Theatre with a Royal Box at Herodium,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 23: 84–108.Google Scholar
Neudecker, R. (1998). “The Roman Villa as a Locus for Art Collections,” in Frazer, A. (ed.), The Roman Villa: Villa Urbana. Philadelphia, 77–91.Google Scholar
Neudecker, R. (2015). “Collecting Culture: Statues and Fragments in Roman Gardens,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano (2015), 129–136.Google Scholar
Neutsch, B. (1940). Der Maler Nikias von Athen: Ein Beitrag zur griechischen Künstlergeschichte und zur pompejanischen Wandmalerei. Borna.Google Scholar
Neutsch, B. (1955). “Das Epigrammenzimmer in der Casa degli Epigrammi zu Pompeji und sein Wandbild ‘Eros im Ringkampf mit Pan’,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 70: 155–184.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2002). “Testing the Boundaries of Ekphrasis: Lucian on the Hall,” Ramus 31: 126–135.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2009). “Absorption and Erudition in Philostratus’ Imagines,” in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus. Cambridge, 322–342.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2012). “The Aesthetics of Violence: Myth and Danger in Roman Domestic Landscapes,” Classical Antiquity 31: 349–389.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. (2016). Greek Myths in Roman Art and Culture: Imagery, Values and Identity in Italy, 50 BC–AD 250. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ní Mhellaigh, K. (2014). Reading Fiction with Lucian: Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2010). “Contemporary Perspectives on Luxury Building in Second-Century BC Rome,” Papers of the British School at Rome 78: 39–61.Google Scholar
Nodelman, S. (1971). “Roman Illusionism: Thoughts on the Birth of Western Spatiality,” Art News Annual 37: 25–38.Google Scholar
Nowicka, M. (1984). “Theophilos, peintre alexandrin, et son activité,” in Bonacasa, N. (ed.), Alessandria e il mondo ellenistico-romano: Studi in onore di Achille Adriani. Rome, 256–259.Google Scholar
Oakley, J.H. (2004). Picturing Death in Classical Athens: The Evidence of the White Lekythoi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2007). In Search of the Sorcerer’s Apprentice: The Traditional Tales of Lucian’s Lover of Lies. Swansea.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. (1987). “Somnia Ficta in Lucretius and Lucilius,” Classical Quarterly 37: 517–519.Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2010). “The Art of Signing in Ancient Greece,” in Platt and Squire (2010), 231–251.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006). Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, T.M. (2007). “Walking with Odysseus: The Portico Frame of the Odyssey Landscapes,” American Journal of Philology 128: 497–532.Google Scholar
Ovadiah, A. (2013). “A Fragmentary Wall Painting in Herod’s Theatre at Herodion: The Drinking Contest between Dionysos and Herakles,” Liber Annus 63: 351–359.Google Scholar
Ovadiah, A. and Turnheim, Y. (2013). “A Wall Painting in Herod’s Theatre at Herodion: An Image of Elysium?” Liber Annus 63: 343–349.Google Scholar
Pace, S. (2000). Herculaneum and European Culture between the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Naples.Google Scholar
Paderni, C. (2000). Monumenti antichi rinvenuti ne reali scavi di Ercolano e Pompej e delineati e spiegati da D. Camillo Paderni romano. Pannuti, U. (ed.). Naples.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. (1955). “The History of Art as a Humanistic Discipline,” in Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. Garden City, 1–25.Google Scholar
Pape, M. (1975). Griechische Kunstwerke aus Kriegsbeute und ihre öffentliche Aufstellung in Rom: von der Eroberung von Syrakus bis in augusteische Zeit. PhD dissertation, Universität Hamburg.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U. (1987). “La ‘Villa Imperiale’ a Pompei: rapporto preliminare,” Dialoghi di archeologia 2: 125–134.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U. (1995). “La bottega della Villa Imperiale a Pompei,” Mededelingen van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 54: 176–190.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U. (1997). “I cicli pittorici nella ‘Villa Imperiale’ a Pompei,” in Corlaita Scagliarini, D. (ed.), I temi figurativi nella pittura parietale antica. Bologna, 271–275.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U. (2007). “Il ritrato romano dipinto,” Quaderni di studi Pompeiani 1: 11–19.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U. (2015). “Einflüsse augusteischer Ideologie in der Wanddekoration von Pompeji und Herculaneum,” in Kussl, R. (ed.), Augustus: Kunst, Kultur und Kaisertum. Speyer, 205–212.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U., Ciardiello, R., and Grimaldi, M. (2008). “L’Insula occidentalis e la villa imperiale,” in Guzzo, P.G. and Guidobaldi, M.P. (eds.), Nuove ricerche archeologiche nell’area vesuviana (scavi 2003–2006): Atti del convegno internazionale, Roma, 1–3 febbraio 2007. Rome, 294–307.Google Scholar
Pappalardo, U. and Grimaldi, M. (2005). “La cronologia della Villa Imperiale di Pompei,” in Ganschow, T., Steinhart, M., Berges, D., and Fröhlich, T. (eds.), Otium: Festschrift für Volker Michael Strocka. Remshalden, 271–274.Google Scholar
Parise-Badoni, F. (1990). “Arianna a Nasso: La rielaborazione di un mito greco in ambiente romano,” Dialoghi di archeologia 8: 73–89.Google Scholar
Parlasca, K., and Seemann, H. (eds.) (1999). Augenblicke: Mumienporträts und ägyptische Grabkunst aus römischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Parslow, C. (1995). Rediscovering Antiquity. Karl Weber and the Excavation of Herculaneum, Pompeii, and Stabiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pekáry, T. (2002). Imago res mortua est. Untersuchungen zur Ablehnung der bildenden Kunst in der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pericolo, L. (2015). “What Is Metapainting? The Self-Aware Image Twenty Years Later,” in Stoichita, V. I (2015), The Self-Aware Image, Turnhout. 11–32.Google Scholar
Perl, E. (1999). “The Presence of the Paradigm: Immanence and Transcendence in Plato’s Theory of Forms,” The Review of Metaphysics 53: 339–362.Google Scholar
Perry, E. (2005). The Aesthetics of Emulation in the Visual Arts of Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peters, W. J. T. (1993). La casa di Marcus Lucretius Fronto a Pompei e le sue pitture. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Peters, W.J.T. and Moormann, E.M. (1995). “I pittori della casa di Marcus Lucretius Fronto a Pompei. Riflessioni un anno dopo,” Mededelingen van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 54: 167–173.Google Scholar
Petersen, E. (1903). “Antike Architekturmalerei,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 18: 87–140.Google Scholar
Pfanner, M. (1989). “Über das Herstellen von Porträts: ein Beitrag zu Rationalisierungsmassnahmen und Produktionsmechanismen von Massenware im späten Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 104: 157–257.Google Scholar
Phillips, K.M. (1968). “Perseus and Andromeda,” American Journal of Archaeology 72: 1–23.Google Scholar
Picard, C. (1955). “Bosquet d’Artémis dans la Casa di Livia au Palatin,” Revue Archéologique 45: 226–228.Google Scholar
Picard, C. (1977). “Origine et signification des fresques architectoniques roman-campaniennes dites de second style,” Revue Archéologique 45: 226–228.Google Scholar
Picard-Schmitter, M.-T. (1971). “Bétyles hellénistiques. À la mémoire de Charles Picard,” Monuments et mémoires de la Fondation Eugène Piot 57: 43–88.Google Scholar
Picón, C.A. and De Puma, R.D. (eds.) (2007). Art of the Classical World in the Metropolitan Museum of Art: Greece, Cyprus, Etruria, Rome. New York.Google Scholar
Pierattini, A. (2012). “Scaenografia e aedificatio nell’architettura delle città vesuviane,” Bollettino d’Arte 14: 1–24.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. (2002). “Viewing, Desiring, Believing: Confronting the Divine in a Pompeian House,” Art History 25: 87–112.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. (2006). “Making an Impression: Replication and the Ontology of the Graeco-Roman Seal Stone,” Art History 29: 233–257.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. (2009). “Where the Wild Things Are: Locating the Marvellous in Augustan Wall-Painting,” in Hardie, P. (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford, 41–74.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. (2011). Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. and Squire, M. (eds.) (2010). The Art of Art History in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Arethusa 43: 133–340, 349–369.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. and Squire, M. (eds.) (2017a). The Frame in Classical Art: A Cultural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Platt, V.J. and Squire, M. (2017b). “Framing the Visual in Greek and Roman Antiquity,” in Platt and Squire (2017a), 3–99.Google Scholar
Plisecka, A. (2011). Tabula picta: aspetti giuridici del lavoro pittorico in Roma antica. Padua.Google Scholar
Pochmarski, E. (1990). Dionysische Gruppen: Eine typologische Untersuchung zur Geschichte des Stützmotivs. Vienna.Google Scholar
Polignac, F. de (1993). “La ‘fortune’ du columbarium,” in Raspi Serra, J. (ed.), Idea e Scienza dell’Antichità. Roma e l’Europa 1700–1770. Rome, 41–63.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J.J. (1974). The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History, and Terminology. New Haven.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J.J. (1978). “The Impact of Greek Art on Rome,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 108: 155–174.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J.J. (2014). “Painting in Greek and Graeco-Roman Art Criticism,” in Pollitt, J.J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge, 288–301.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2009). “Is Art Modern? Kristeller’s ‘Modern System of the Arts’ Reconsidered,” British Journal of Aesthetics 49: 1–24.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2010a). “Why Art has Never Been Autonomous,” in Platt and Squire (2010), 165–180.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2010b). The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2011). “Against λεπτότης: Rethinking Hellenistic Aesthetics,” in Erskine, A. and Llewellyn-Jones, L. (eds.), Creating a Hellenistic World. Swansea, 271–312.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2012). “The Value of Aesthetic Value,” in Papadopoulos, J. and Urton, G. (eds.), The Construction of Value in the Ancient World. Los Angeles, 336–353.Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2017). “Disfigurations: Erich Auerbach’s Theory of Figura,” Critical Inquiry 44: 80–113.Google Scholar
Possanza, D.M. (2004). Translating the Heavens: Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin translation. New York.Google Scholar
Potts, A. (1994). Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. New Haven.Google Scholar
Potts, A. (2006). “Introduction,” in History of the Art of Antiquity. Los Angeles, 1–53.Google Scholar
Powell, A. (2010). “Painting as Blur: Landscapes in Paintings of the Dutch Interior,” Oxford Art Journal 33: 145–166.Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (1995). “Cicero’s Translations from Greek,” in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Twelve Papers. Oxford, 273–300.Google Scholar
Prêtre, C. (1999). “Le matériel votif à Délos: exposition et conservation,” Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 123: 389–396.Google Scholar
Prettejohn, E. (2002). “Lawrence Alma-Tadema and the Modern City of Ancient Rome,” The Art Bulletin 84: 115–129.Google Scholar
Pretzler, M. (2010). “From One Connoisseur to Another: Pausanias as Winckelmann’s Guide to Analysing Greek Art,” Classical Receptions Journal 2: 197–218.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. (2007). Regards alexandrins: histoire et théorie des arts dans l’épigramme hellénistique. Leuven.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. (2008). Petits musées en vers: épigrammes et discours sur les collections antiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. (2015). “Poetic Depictions of Ancient Dactyliothecae,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano (2010), 54–71.Google Scholar
Prisco, G. (2009) Filologia dei materiali e trasmissione al futuro. Indagini e schedatura sui dipinti murali del Museo Archeologico di Napoli. Rome.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (2003). Pliny. Natural History, Volume IX: Books 33–35. Loeb Classical Library 394. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reeder, J.C. (1989). Agyieus and Baluster, Aniconic Monuments in Roman Art. PhD dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1977). “Hercules Musarum and the Porticus Philippi in Rome,” American Journal of Archaeology 81: 355–361.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B.S. (1984). Roman Copies of Greek Sculpture: The Problem of the Originals. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B.S. (2002). Hellenistic Sculpture. III, The Styles of ca.100–31 B.C. Madison.Google Scholar
Ridley, R.T. (1992). “The Praetor and the Pyramid: The Tomb of Gaius Cestius in History, Archaeology and Literature,” Bolletino di Archeologia 13–15: 1–30.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A.M. (1997). “‘Public’ and ‘Private’ in Roman Culture: The Case of the Cubiculum,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 36–56.Google Scholar
Rizzo, S. (2001). “Indagini nei fori Imperiali: Oroidrografia, foro di Cesare, foro di Augusto,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 108: 215–244.Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1895). “Votivgemälde eines Apobaten,” Hallisches Winckelmannsprogramm 19: 1–20.Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1897). “Die Knöchelspielerinnen des Alexandros,” Hallisches Winckelmannsprogramm 21: 1–21.Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1898). “Kentaurenkampf und Tragoedienscene. Zwei Marmorbilder aus Herculaneum,” Hallisches Winckelmannsprogramm 22: 1–37.Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1899). “Der Müde Silen. Marmorbild aus Herculaneum,” Hallisches Winckelmannsprogramm 22: 1–25.Google Scholar
Robert, C. (1903). “Niobe. Ein Marmorbild aus Pompeii,” Hallisches Winckelmannsprogramm 24: 1–12.Google Scholar
Roby, C. (2016). Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Almeida, E. (1981). Forma urbis marmorea: aggiornamento generale 1980. Rome.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J.C. (1998). Suetonius. Lives of the Caesars, Volume I: Julius. Augustus. Tiberius. Gaius. Caligula. Loeb Classical Library 31. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2004). “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” Classical Philology 99: 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2009). “The Exemplary Past in Roman Historiography and Culture,” in Feldherr, A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge, 214–230.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2010). “Demolished Houses, Monumentality, and Memory in Roman Culture,” Classical Antiquity 29: 117–1180.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2013). “On the Intersignification of Monuments in Augustan Rome,” in Baraz and van den Berg (2013), 119–131.Google Scholar
Romm, J. (1990). “Wax, Stone, and Promethean Clay: Lucian as Plastic Artist,” Classical Antiquity 9: 74–98.Google Scholar
Rose, M.E. (2006). “The Trier Ceiling: Power and Status on Display in Late Antiquity,” Greece & Rome 53: 92–109.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (2010). “Taking the First Style Seriously,” Chicago Art Journal 20: 103–115.Google Scholar
Roullet, A. (1972). The Egyptian and Egyptianizing Monuments of Imperial Rome. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1987a). “Les lieux de la memoir publique: quelques remarques sur la fonction des tableaux dans la cité,” Opus 6–8: 101–124.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1987b). “Tout la mémoire du monde. La notion de collection dans la NH de Pline,” Helmantica 38: 115–133.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1989). Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne: Ve siècle av. J.-C.-Ier siècle ap. J.-C. Rome.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (2002). “Vitruve et les faux-semblants,” in Pontrandolfo, A. (ed.), La pittura parietale in Macedonia e Magna Grecia. Salerno, 105–124.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (2007). “Collection romaine de tableaux grecs,” in Croisille, J.-M. and Perrin, Y. (eds.), Neronia VII: Rome, l’Italie e la Grèce. Hellénisme et philhellénisme au premier siècle après J.-C. Clermont-Ferrand, 342–354.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (2014). “Etruscan and Italic Tomb Painting, c. 400–200 B.C.,” in Pollitt, J.J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge, 238–287.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (2015). “Painting and Private Art Collections in Rome,” in Destree and Murray (2015), 109–127.Google Scholar
Rowell, H. (1940). “The Forum and Funeral ‘Imagines’ of Augustus.” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 17: 131–143.Google Scholar
Rozenberg, S. (2009). “Wall Paintings of the Hellenistic and Roman Period in the Land of Israel,” in Jacobson, D. and Kokkinos, N. (eds.), Herod and Augustus. Papers Presented at the IJS Conference 21st-23rd June 2005. Leiden, 249–265.Google Scholar
Rozenberg, S. (2013). “Interior Decoration in Herod’s Palaces,” in Mevorah, D. and Rozenberg, S. (eds.), Herod the Great: The King’s Final Journey. Jerusalem, 166–223.Google Scholar
Rudolph, K. (2011). “Democritus’ Perspectival Theory of Vision,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 131: 67–83.Google Scholar
Ruggiero, M. (1885). Storia degli scavi di Ercolano ricomposta su’ documenti superstiti. Naples.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S.H. (2012). Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting. Oxford.Google Scholar
Salowey, C.A. (2012). “Women on Hellenistic Grave Stelai: Reading Images and Texts,” in James, S.L. and Dillon, S. (eds.), A Companion to Women in the Ancient World. Chichester, 249–262.Google Scholar
Salvo, G. (2018). Pinacothecae: Testimonianze di collezionismo di quadri nel mondo antico. Rome.Google Scholar
Salzmann, D. (1982). Untersuchungen zu den antiken Kieselmosaiken: von den Anfängen bis zum Beginn der Tesseratechnik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sampaolo, V. (1998) “Gli affreschi del museo archeologico di Napoli,” in Donati, A. (ed.) Romana pictura. La pittura romana delle origini all’età bizantina. Naples, 65–72.Google Scholar
Sampaolo, V. (2005). “In margine alle figure del salone 13 della villa di Terzigno,” in Guzzo, P.G. (ed.), Storie da un’eruzione: in margine alla mostra. Atti della tavola rotonda, Napoli, 12 giugno 2003. Naples, 113–125.Google Scholar
Sande, S. (2004). “Pagan Pinakes and Christian Icons. Continuity or Parallelism?” Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia 28: 81–100.Google Scholar
Santoro, S. (2007). “Intorno a una parete verde al Museo di Trier: alcune riflessioni sulla monocromia nella pittura romana,” in Pelegrín, C.G. (ed.), Circulación de temas y sistemas decorativos en la pintura antigua. Calatayud, 153–163.Google Scholar
Sanucci, P. (1992). “Tecnica di esecuzione e dei distacchi degli affreschi di età romana,” in De Caro, S. (ed.), Alla ricerca di Iside. Analisi, studi, e restauri dell’Iseo pompeiano nel museo di Napoli. Naples, 111–114.Google Scholar
Sanzi di Mino, M.R. and Bragantini, I. (1998). La Villa della Farnesina: in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme. Milan.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (1987). “Le complexe pompéien du Champ de Mars: nouveauté urbanistique à finalité idéologique,” in L’Urbs: espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.-C.- IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.): actes du colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique et l’École française de Rome (Rome, 8–12 mai 1985). Rome, 457–473.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (1990). “Les monstres, au coeur des conflits esthétiques à Rome au Ier siècle avant J.-C,” Revue de l’Art 90.1: 35–45.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (1994). Quis deum? l’expression plastique des idéologies politiques et religieuses à Rome à la fin de la République et au début du principat. Rome.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (1998). La grande fresque de la villa des Mystères à Pompéi: mémoires d’une dévote de Dionysos. Paris.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (2001). “La révolution iconographique du ‘deuxième style’.” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 113: 769–786.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (2009). Les décors privés des Romains: dans l’intimité des maîtres du monde. Paris.Google Scholar
Savile, A. and Wollheim, R. (1986). “Imagination and Pictorial Understanding,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 60: 19–60.Google Scholar
Schapiro, M. (1969). “On Some Problems in the Semiotics of Visual Art: Field and Vehicle in Image-Signs,” Semiotica 1: 223–242.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1953). “Helena im Schutz der Isis,” in Mylonas, G.E. and Raymond, D. (eds.), Studies Presented to David M. Robinson on his 70th Birthday. St. Louis, 1096–1102.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1957). Die Wände Pompejis: Topographisches Verzeichnis der Bildmotive. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1972). La peinture pompéienne. Essai sur l’évolution de sa signification. Brussels.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. (1976). “Bilderbücher als Vorlagen römischer Sarkophage,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 88: 759–811.Google Scholar
Scheibler, I. (1998). “Zu den Bildinhalten der Klapptürbilder römischer Wanddekorationen,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 105: 1–20.Google Scholar
Scheibler, I. (2003). “Wanddekor und Pinakes. Zur Malerei des Theophilos von Alexandria,” in Epitoumbion Gerhard Neumann. Athens, 189–195.Google Scholar
Schmalz, B. (1989a). “Theseus, der Sieger über den Minotauros,” Archäologischer Anzeiger 71–79.Google Scholar
Schmalz, B. (1989b). “Andromeda: Ein campanisches Wandbild,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 104: 259–181.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Colinet, A. (2016). “The Reconstruction and Distribution of Pattern Books in the Roman Empire: Some Archaeological Evidence from Palmyra,” in Adornato, G. (ed.), Intorno al Papiro di Artemidoro. III, I disegni: atti del convegno internazionale del 4 febbraio 2011 presso il Gabinetto Disegni e Stampe degli Uffizi, Firenze. Milan, 129–146.Google Scholar
Schur, D. (2004). “A Garland of Stones: Hellenistic Lithika as Reflections on Poetic Transformation.” in Acosta-Hughes, Kosmetatou, and Baumbach (2004), 118–122.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, B. (1925). Der bildende Künstler und der Begriff des Künstlerischen in der Antike. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, B. (1932). Xenokrates von Athen: Beiträge zur Geschichte der antiken Kunstforschung und Kunstanschauung. Halle.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1997). “The Ethics of Brutus and Cassius.” The Journal of Roman Studies 87: 41–53.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999). “Lucretius’ Use and Avoidance of Greek,” Proceedings of the British Academy 93: 227–246.Google Scholar
Seipel, W. (ed.) (1998). Bilder aus dem Wüstensand: Mumienporträts aus dem Ägptischen Museum Kairo: Eine Ausstellung des Kunsthistorischen Museums Wien, 20. Oktober 1998 bis 24. Januar 1999. Vienna.Google Scholar
Sekora, J. (1977). Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought, Eden to Smollett. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Semper, G. (2004). Style in the Technical and Tectonic Arts, or, Practical Aesthetics. Trans. H.F. Mallgrave and M. Robinson. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Settis, S. (1993). “La trattistica delle arti figurative,” in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L., and Lanza, D. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica. Salerno, 469–498.Google Scholar
Settis, S. (2002). Le pareti ingannevoli: la Villa di Livia e la pittura di giardino. Milan.Google Scholar
Settis, S., Anguissola, A., and Gasparotto, D. (eds.) (2015). Serial/Portable Classic: The Greek Canon and Its Mutations. Milan.Google Scholar
Severy, B. (2004). Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire. New York.Google Scholar
Severy-Hoven, B. (2012). “Master Narratives and the Wall Painting of the House of the Vettii, Pompeii,” Gender & History 24: 540–580.Google Scholar
Shaviro, S. (2009). Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shaya, J. (2005). “The Greek Temple as Museum: The Case of the Legendary Treasure of Athena from Lindos,” American Journal of Archaeology 109: 423–442.Google Scholar
Shaya, J. (2013). “The Public Life of Monuments: The Summi Viri of the Forum of Augustus,” American Journal of Archaeology 117: 83–110.Google Scholar
Shaya, J. (2015). “Greek Temple Treasures and the Invention of Collecting,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano (2015), 24–33.Google Scholar
Silberberg-Peirce, S. (1980). “Politics and Private Imagery: The Sacral-Idyllic Landscapes,” Art History 3: 1–24.Google Scholar
Sinisgalli, R. (2012). Perspective in the Visual Culture of Classical Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sinn, U. and Wehgartner, I. (2001). Begegnung mit der Antike: Zeugnisse aus vier Jahrtausenden mittelmeerischer Kultur im Südflügel der Würzburger Residenz. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. (2001). “Ladies Day at the Art Institute: Theocritus, Herodas, and the Gendered Gaze,” in Lardinois, A.P.M.H. and McClure, L. (eds.), Making Silence Speak: Women’s Voices in Greek Literature and Society. Princeton, 201–222.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. (eds.) (2012). Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden.Google Scholar
Small, J.P. (2008). “Visual Copies and Memory,” in Mackay, E.A. (ed.), Orality, Literacy, Memory in the Ancient Greek and Roman World. Leiden, 227–252.Google Scholar
Small, J. P (2013). “Skenographia in Brief,” in Harrison, G. and Liapis, V. (eds.), Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre. Leiden, 111–128.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2004). “Elusive Stones: Reading Posidippus’ Lithika through Technical Writing on Stones.” in Acosta-Hughes, Kosmetatou, and Baumbach (2004), 105–117.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M. (1998). Homer and the Artists: Text and Picture in Early Greek Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sojc, N. (ed.) (2012). Domus Augustana: Archäologische und bauhistorische Dokumentationsarbeiten auf dem Palatin in Rom. Leiden.Google Scholar
Söldner, M. (2004). “Zur Funktion ägyptischer Elemente in der römischen Wanddekoration.” in Bol, P.C., Kaminski, G., and Maderna, C. (eds.), Fremdheit-Eigenheit. Ägypten, Griechenland und Rom: Austausch und Verständnis. Frankfurt, 201–212.Google Scholar
Söldner, M. (2009). “Naiskoi für Menschen: Eine heroisierende Fiktion im unteritalischen Vasenbild,” in Bettenworth, A. and Schmitz, C. (eds.), Mensch – Heros – Gott: Weltentwürfe und Lebensmodelle im Mythos der Vormoderne. Stuttgart, 35–51.Google Scholar
Solin, H. (2008). “Introduzione allo studio dei graffiti parietali,” in Brandt, O. and Solin, H. (eds.), Unexpected Voices: The Graffiti in the Cryptoporticus of the Horti Sallustiani and Papers from a Conference on Graffiti at the Swedish Institute in Rome, 7 March 2003. Stockholm, 99–124.Google Scholar
Sörries, R. (2003). Das Malibu-Triptychon: ein Totengedenkbild aus dem römischen Ägypten und verwandte Werke der spätantiken Tafelmalerei. Dettelbach.Google Scholar
Spannagel, M. (1999). Exemplaria principis: Untersuchungen zu Entstehung und Ausstattung des Augustusforums. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Spinazzola, V. (1953). Pompei alla luce degli scavi nuovi di Via dell’Abbondanza (anni 1910–1923), ed. Aurigemma, S.. Rome.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010a). “Reading a View: Poem and Picture in the Greek Anthology,” Ramus 39: 73–103.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010b). “Introduction: The Art of Art History in Greco-Roman Antiquity,” in Platt and Squire (2010), 133–163.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010c). “Making Myron’s Cow Moo? Ecphrastic Epigram and the Poetics of Simulation,” American Journal of Philology 131: 589–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, M. (2011). The Iliad in a Nutshell: Visualizing Epic on the Tabulae Iliacae. Oxford.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2012a). “Classical Archaeology and the Contexts of Art History,” in Alcock, S.E. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Classical Archaeology. 2nd edn. Malden, 468–500.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2012b). “Greek Art through Roman Eyes,” in Plantzos, D. and Smith, T.J. (eds.), A Companion to Greek Art. Oxford, 599–620.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013a). “Apparitions Apparent: Ekphrasis and the Parameters of Vision in the Elder Philostratus’ Imagines,” Helios 40: 97–140.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013b). “Ekphrasis at the Forge and the Forging of Ekphrasis: The ‘Shield of Achilles’ in Graeco-Roman Word and Image,” Word and Image 29: 157–191.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013c). “Embodied Ambiguities on the Prima Porta Augustus,” Art History 36: 242–279.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013d). “Ars in their ‘I’s: Authority and Authorship in Graeco-Roman Visual Culture,” in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. (eds.), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford, 357–414.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013e). “‘Fantasies So Varied and Bizarre’: The Domus Aurea, the Renaissance, and the ‘Grotesque’,” in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. (eds.), A Companion to the Age of Nero. Chichester, 444–464.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2014). “The Ordo of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of Ordo,” in Elsner and Meyer (2010), 353–417.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015a). “Roman Art and the Artist,” in Borg, B. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Art. Malden, 172–194.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015b). “Conceptualizing the (Visual) ‘Arts’,” in Destrée and Murray (2015), 307–326.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015c). “Running Rings Round Troy: Recycling the ‘Epic Circle’ in Hellenistic and Roman art,” in Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. (eds.), The Greek Epic Cycle and Its Ancient Reception. A Companion. Cambridge, 496–542.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015d). “Ars Revixit? In Search of the Ancient Artist,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 28: 523–535.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015e). “Figuring Rome’s Foundation on the Iliac Tablets,” in Mac Sweeney, N. (ed.), Foundation Myths in Ancient Societies. Philadelphia, 151–189.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2016). “Ignotum per ignotius? Pompeii, Vergil and the ‘Museum of Augustus’,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 29: 598–606.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2016b). “‘How to Read a Roman Portrait’? Optatian Porfyry, Constantine, and the Vultus Augusti.” Papers of the British School at Rome 84: 179–240.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2017). “Framing the Roman ‘Still-Life’: Campanian Wall Painting and the Frames of Mural Make-Believe,” in Platt and Squire (2017a), 188–253.Google Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. (1989). “Polygnotos’s Iliupersis: A New Reconstruction,” American Journal of Archaeology 93: 203–215.Google Scholar
Stansbury-O’Donnell, M. (1990). “Polygnotos’s Nekyia: A Reconstruction and Analysis,” American Journal of Archaeology 94: 213–235.Google Scholar
Stauffer, A. (2008). Antike Musterblätter: Wirkkartons aus dem spätantiken und frühbyzantinischen Ägypten. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Stauffer, A. (2016). “Zum Gebrauch von Musterblättern in der antiken Textilherstellung,” in Adornato, G. (ed.), Intorno al Papiro di Artemidoro. III, I disegni: atti del convegno internazionale del 4 febbraio 2011 presso il Gabinetto Disegni e Stampe degli Uffizi, Firenze. Milan, 147–164.Google Scholar
Stears, K. (2000). “Losing the Picture: Change and Continuity in Athenian Grave Monuments in the Fourth and Third Centuries B.C.,” in Rutter, N.K. and Sparkes, B. (eds.), Word and Image in Ancient Greece. Edinburgh, 206–227.Google Scholar
Stewart, A.F. (2006). “Baroque Classics: The Tragic Muse and the Exemplum,” in Porter, J.I. (ed.), Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greco-Roman Antiquity. Princeton, 127–170.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (1984). On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Stinson, P. (2011). “Perspective Systems in Roman Second Style Wall Painting,” American Journal of Archaeology 115: 403–426.Google Scholar
Stoichita, V.I. (1997). The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Meta-Painting. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stoichita, V.I. (2015). The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Metapainting. 2nd edn. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Strazzulla, J.M. (1990). Il principato di Apollo: Mito e propaganda nelle lastre ‘Campane’ dal Tempio di Apollo Palatino. Rome.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (1984). “Ein missverstandener Terminus des vierten Stils. Die Casa del Sacello Iliaco in Pompeji (I 6, 4),” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 91: 125–140.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (1993). “Pompeji VI 17, 41: Ein Haus mit Privatbibliothek,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 100: 321–351.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (1995). “Das Bildprogramm des Epigrammzimmers in Pompeji,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 102: 269–290.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (2005a). “Troja – Karthago – Rom: Ein vorvergilisches Bildprogramm in Terzigno bei Pompeji,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 112: 79–120.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (ed.) (2005b). Meisterwerke: Internationales Symposion anlässlich des 150. Geburtstages von Adolf Furtwängler: Freiburg im Breisgau, 30. Juni–3. Juli 2003. Munich.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (2006). “Aeneas, nicht Alexander! Zur Ikonographie des römischen Helden in der pompejanischen Wandmalerei,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 121: 269–315.Google Scholar
Strocka, V.M. (2007). “Domestic Decoration: Painting and the ‘Four Styles’,” in Dobbins, J. and Foss, P. (eds.), The World of Pompeii. London, 302–322.Google Scholar
Strong, D. (1994). “Roman Museums,” in Roman Museums. Selected Papers on Roman Art and Architecture. London, 13–32.Google Scholar
Summers, D. (2003). Real Spaces: World Art History and the Rise of Western Modernism. New York.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. (2015). Egypt in Italy: Visions of Egypt in Roman Imperial Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammisto, A. (2012). “Gli uccelli nelle pitture di giardino della Casa della Venere in Conchiglia,” Rivista di Studi Pompeiani 23: 29–38.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2006). The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2016). “Sight and Painting: Optical Theory and Pictorial Poetics in Classical Greek Art,” in Squire, M. (ed.), Sight and the Ancient Senses. New York, 107–114.Google Scholar
Taplin, O. (2007). Pots and Plays: Interactions between Tragedy and Greek Vase-Painting of the Fourth CenturyB.C. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Testa, F. (1999). Winckelmann e l’invenzione della storia dell’arte: i modelli e la mimesi. Bologna.Google Scholar
Teverson, R. (2015). Augustan Kings: The Art and Architecture of Herod the Great of Judea and Juba II of Mauretania, PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Thébert, Y. (1992). “Private Life and Domestic Architecture in Roman Africa,” in Veyne, P. (ed.), A History of Private Life: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium. Cambridge, 314–411.Google Scholar
Thimme, J. (1964). “Die Stele der Hegeso als Zeugnis des attischen Grabkults,” Antike Kunst 7: 16–29.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (1995). “Zum Zeugniswert griechischer Beischriften auf römischen Wandgemälden der späten Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit.” Mededelingen van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 54: 110–23.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. and Witschel, C. (1992). “Constructing Reconstruction: Claim and Reality of Roman Rebuilding Inscriptions from the Latin West,” Papers of the British School at Rome 60: 135–177.Google Scholar
Thompson, M.L. (1960). “The Monumental and Literary Evidence for Programmatic Painting in Antiquity,” Marsyas 9: 36–77.Google Scholar
Todisco, L. (1990). “Eracle, la statua, l’artefice sul cratere apulo di New York MMA 50.11.4,” Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome 102: 901–957.Google Scholar
Tomei, M.A. (2000). “Le case di Augusto sul Palatino,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 107: 7–36.Google Scholar
Tomei, M.A. (2013). “Note su Palatium di Filippo Coarelli,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 26: 526–538.Google Scholar
Tomei, M.A. and Carettoni, G. (2014). Augusto sul Palatino: gli scavi di Gianfilippo Carettoni, appunti inediti (1955–1984). Milan.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. (2001). “Forma greca e culture periferiche: il caso di Kazanlak,” in Barbanera, M. (ed.), Storie dell’arte antica. Atti del convegno ‘Storia dell’arte ancita nell’ultima generazione: tendenze e prospettive.’ Roma, 19–20 febbraio 2001. Rome, 141–170.Google Scholar
Tortorella, S. (2008). “Tabulae pictae e non solo. Geografia e rappresentazione della vittoria nel trionfo,” in La Rocca, E. and Tortorella, S. (eds.), Trionfi romani. Milan, 56–61.Google Scholar
Tortorella, S. (2010). “La raffigurazione pittoriche ‘trionfali’. Affreschi, quadri, iscrizioni dipinte,” in Bragantini, I. (ed.), Atti del X Congresso Internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour le Peinture Murale Antique) Napoli 17–21 Settembre 2007. Naples, 113–125.Google Scholar
Tortorici, E. (1990). “L’attività edilizia di Agrippa a Roma,” in Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. and Grant, M. (eds.), Il bimillenario di Agrippa. Genua, 19–55.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1998). “Home and Forum: Cicero between ‘Public’ and ‘Private’,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 1–23.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1999). “The Upper-Class House as Symbol and Focus of Emotion in Cicero,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 12: 33–56.Google Scholar
Trendall, A.D. (1989). Red Figure Vases of South Italy and Sicily: A Handbook. New York.Google Scholar
Trendall, A.D. and Cambitoglou, A. (1978). The Red-Figured Vases of Apulia. Volume 1: Early and Middle Apulian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trendall, A.D. and Cambitoglou, A. (1982). The Red-Figured Vases of Apulia. Volume 2: Late Apulian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. (2002). “Greek Myth, Gender, and Social Structure at a Roman House: Two Paintings of Achilles at Pompeii,” in Gazda (2002), 225–248.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. (2011). Women and Visual Replication in Roman Imperial Art and Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tybout, R.A. (1989a). “Die Perspektive bei Vitruv: Zwei Überlieferungen von scaenographia,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J.J. (eds.), Munus non ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture, Leiden, 20–23 January 1987. Leiden, 55–68.Google Scholar
Tybout, R.A. (1989b). Aedificiorum figurae: Untersuchungen zu den Architekturdarstellungen des frühen zweiten Stils. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tybout, R.A. (2001). “Roman Wall Painting and Social Significance,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 14: 33–56.Google Scholar
Ungaro, L. (2004). “Il rivestimento dipinto dell ‘Aula del Colosso’ nel Foro di Augusto,” in Papini, M. and Polito, E. (eds.), Colori del bianco: policromia nella scultura antica. Rome, 275–280.Google Scholar
Unger, M. and Garello, F. (2014). “Virtual Digs: Digitization as Revisitation of Past Finds,” Archaeological Review from Cambridge 29: 103–128.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. (1925). The Philosophy of “As If”, a System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind. Trans. C.K. Ogden. New York.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. (2007). “Four Women from Stabiae: Eighteenth-Century Antiquarian Practice and the History of Ancient Roman Painting,” in Gardner Coates, V. and Seydl, J.L. (eds.), Antiquity Recovered: The Legacy of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Los Angeles, 73–94.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. (2011). “Fallax Imago: Ovid’s Narcissus and the Seduction of Mimesis in Roman Wall Painting,” Word and Image 27: 378–395.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. (2012). “Elegy, Art, and the Viewer,” in Gold, B.K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Hoboken, 318–338.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. (2014). “Pictorial Paratexts: Floating Figures in Roman Wall Painting,” in Jansen, L. (ed.), The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge, 176–205.Google Scholar
Vallois, R. (1913). “Les πίνακες déliens,” in Holleaux, M. (ed.), Mélanges Holleaux: recueil de mémoires concernant l’antiquité grecque offert à Maurice Holleaux en souvenir de ses années de direction à l’École franc̜aise d’Athènes (1904–1912). Paris, 289–299.Google Scholar
Van Buren, A. (1938). “Pinacothecae, with Special Reference to Pompeii,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 15: 70–81.Google Scholar
Varone, A. (1995). “L’organizzazione del lavoro in una bottega di decoratori: le evidenze dal recente scavo pompeiano lungo Via dell’Abbondanza,” Mededeelingen van het Nederlands Historisch Instituut te Rome 54: 124–139.Google Scholar
Venit, M.S. (2002). The Monumental Tombs of Ancient Alexandria: The Theater of the Dead. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1991). Mortals and Immortals: Collected Essays, ed. Zeitlin, F.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Versluys, M.J. (2002). Aegyptiaca Romana: Nilotic Scenes and the Roman Views of Egypt. Leiden.Google Scholar
Viscogliosi, A. (1996). Il tempio di Apollo in Circo e la formazione del linguaggio architettonico augusteo. Rome.Google Scholar
Vlad Borelli, L. (1967). “Il restauro dell’Aula Isiaca,” Bolletino dell’istituto centrale del restauro 47: 7–46.Google Scholar
Vout, C. (2003). “Embracing Egypt,” in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge, 192–195.Google Scholar
Vout, C. (2012). “Unfinished Business: Re-Viewing Medea in Roman Painting,” Ramus 41: 119–43.Google Scholar
Walker, S. (2003). “Carry-On at Canopus: The Nilotic Mosaic from Palestrina and Roman Attitudes to Egypt,” in Matthews, R. and Roemer, C. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Egypt. London, 191–202.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988). “The Social Structure of the Roman House,” Papers of the British School at Rome 56: 43–97.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1990). “Pliny the Elder and Man’s Unnatural History,” Greece & Rome 37: 80–96.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2009). “Case dipinte: Il sistema decorativo della casa romana come aspetto sociale,” in La Rocca, E., Ensoli, S., Tortorella, S., and Papini, M. (eds.), Roma: La pittura di un impero. Milan, 31–37.Google Scholar
Walton, K.L. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wamberg, J. (2009). Landscape as World Picture: Tracing Cultural Evolution in Images. Trans. G. Kynoch. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Warmington, E.H. (1938). Remains of Old Latin, Volume III: Lucilius, The Twelve Tables. Loeb Classical Library 329. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2010). “Lucretius and Greek Philosophy,” in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P.R. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge, 19–32.Google Scholar
Waurick, G. (1975). “Kunstraub der Römer: Untersuchungen zu den Anfängen anhand der Inschriften,” Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 22: 1–46.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (1997). “Mémoire et imagination: les limites de l’enargeia,” in Lévy, C. and Pernot, L. (eds.), Dire l’évidence: philosophie et rhétorique antiques. Paris, 229–248.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009). Ekphrasis, Imagination, and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Weber, B. (2005). “Ein aktualisiertes Familienbild? Überlegungen zur Datierung des Berliner Severertondos,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts. Römische Abteilung 112: 425–431.Google Scholar
Weis, H.A. (2003). “Gaius Verres and the Roman Art Market: Consumption and Connoisseurship in Verrine II 4,” in Haltenhoff, A., Heil, A., and Mutschler, F.-H. (eds.), O tempora, o mores! Römische Werte und römische Literatur in den letzten Jahrzehnten der Republik. Munich, 354–400.Google Scholar
Weitzmann, K. (1947). Illustrations in Roll and Codex: A Study of the Origin and Method of Text Illustration. Princeton.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. (1968). “Zur asymmetrischen Perspektive in der Wanddekoration des zweiten pompejanischen Stils,” Marburger Winckelmanns Programm: 102–109.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. (1985). “Römische Wandmalerei am Ausgang der Republik. Der zweite pompejanische Stil,” Gymnasium 92: 470–488.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. (1988). “Zur Io des Nikias in den pompejanischen Wandbildern,” in Schmidt, M. (ed.), Kanon: Festschrift Ernst Berger zum 60. Geburtstag am 26. Februar 1988 gewidmet. Basel, 344–350.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J.J. (1764b). Nachrichten von den neuesten herculanischen Entdeckungen. Dresden.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J.J. (1987). Reflections on the Imitation of Greek Works in Painting and Sculpture. Trans. E. Heyer and R.C. Norton. La Salle.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J.J. (2006). History of the Art of Antiquity. Trans. H.F. Mallgrave. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, J.J. (2011). Letter and Report on the discoveries at Herculaneum. Trans. C. C. Mattusch. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. (1987). “Conspicui postes tectaque digna deo: The Public Image of Aristocratic and Imperial Houses in the Late Republic and Early Empire,” in Pietri, C. (ed.), L’Urbs, espace urbain et histoire (Ier siècle av. J.-C.-IIIe siècle apr. J.-C.). Rome, 393–413.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. (2009). “The House of Augustus and the Lupercal,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 22: 527–545.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical Investigations: The German Text, with a Revised English Translation. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. 3rd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1980). “Seeing-As, Seeing-In, and Pictorial Representation,” in Art and Its Objects. Cambridge, 205–226.Google Scholar
Wood, C.S. (1991). “Introduction,” in Panofsky, (1991), Perspective as Symbolic Form. New York, 7–24.Google Scholar
Wood, C.S. (ed.) (2000). The Vienna School Reader: Politics and Art Historical Method in the 1930s. New York.Google Scholar
Wood, C.S. (2008). Forgery, Replica, Fiction: Temporalities of German Renaissance Art. Chicago.Google Scholar
Wu, H. (1996). The Double Screen: Medium and Representation in Chinese Painting. London.Google Scholar
Wulf-Rheidt, U. (2012). “Still Higher and More Audacious: The Architecture of the Imperial Palaces on the Palatine in Rome,” in Ousterhout, R., Holod, R., and Haselberger, L. (eds.), Masons at Work: Architecture and Construction in the Pre-Modern World. Philadelphia. www.sas.upenn.edu/ancient/masons/uwr.pdf.Google Scholar
Wyler, S. (2006). “Roman Replications of Greek Art at the Villa Farnesina,” Art History 29: 213–232.Google Scholar
Yalouris, N. (1986). “Le myth d’Io: Les transformations d’Io dans l’iconographie et la littérature grecques.” in Augé, C. and.de Bellefonds, P.Linant (eds.), Iconographie classique et identité régionale. Paris, 3–23.Google Scholar
Yardley, J.C. (2017). Livy. History of Rome, Books 31–34. Loeb Classical Library 295. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Young, E.M. (2016). Translation as Muse: Poetic Translation in Catullus’s Rome. Chicago.Google Scholar
Yuen, T. (1970). “The ‘Bibliotheca Graeca’: Castagno, Alberti, and Ancient Sources,” The Burlington Magazine 112.812: 725–736.Google Scholar
Zaloscher, H. (1961). Porträts aus dem Wüstensand: Die Mumienbildnisse aus der Oase Fayum. Vienna.Google Scholar
Zanda, E. (2011). Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (1981). “Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 124: 297–311.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (2003). “New Light on the Literary Category of ‘Ekphrastic Epigram’ in Antiquity: The New Posidippus (Col. X 7–XI 19 p. Mil. vogl. VIII 309),” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 143: 59–62.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1974). Klassizistische Statuen: Studien zur Veränderung des Kunstgeschmacks in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mainz.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1979). “Die Villa als Vorbild des späten pompejanischen Wohngeschmacks,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 94: 460–523.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (2002). “Domitian’s Palace on the Palatine and the Imperial Image,” in Bowman, A. and Millar, F. (eds.), Representations of Empire: Rome and the Mediterranean World. Oxford, 105–130.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (2008). “Designing the Landscapes of the Villa of Livia at Prima Porta,” in Kurtz, D., Meyer, C., Saunders, D., Tsingarida, A., and Harris, N. (eds.), Essays in Classical Archaeology for Eleni Hatzivassiliou. Oxford, 269–276.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (ed.) (2010). The Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum: Archaeology, Reception, and Digital Reconstruction. Berlin.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (2014). Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes (c.100 BCE–79 CE). Oxford.Google Scholar
Zevi, F. and Bove, E.V. (2008). “The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina,” in Lo Sardo (2008), 78–87.Google Scholar
Zimmer, G. (1994). “Republikanisches Kunstverständnis: Cicero gegen Verres,” in Hellenkemper Salies, G. (1994), 867–874.Google Scholar
Zink, S. (2011). Octavian’s Sanctuary of Apollo on the Palatine: Architecture, Site, and the Development of a Sacred Topography, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar