Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:17:35.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2019

Get access

Summary

I have a fantastic old Burmese cookbook on my bookshelves, which proudly informs me that there is no need for feminism in Myanmar.

Great stuff, I think. Things must be totally equal here. So, why's that, then? Ah. Hang on.

There is no need for feminism, I learn, “because it is every Burmese woman's sole aim to become a wife.”

The situation for women in Myanmar is actually even more complicated, and multifaceted, than this suggests. Take the country's 2008 constitution. While article 348 proclaims: “The Union shall not discriminate any citizen of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, based on race, birth, religion, official position, status, culture, sex and wealth”, elsewhere, some government jobs are described as being “naturally suitable for men only”.

While Aung San Suu Kyi is currently the country's de facto leader, she first rose to prominence thanks to her famous father, the country's independence hero General Aung San.

While the country is 80th out of 159 countries in the United Nations’ most recent gender equality index, it is higher than many of its neighbours: Cambodia (112), Laos (106), and even India (125).

And looking at the situation in the past does not clear things up much, either. There is an amazing article in The Atlantic from 1958 by Mya Sein, former head of the Burma Women's Council. It recounts how she was surprised by how fiercely the British colonialists fought back against attempts by the more emancipated Burmese women to get some female representation in the Legislature in 1927.

The backward Brits didn't hold out, though; the first Burmese woman was elected in 1929. But some would argue the situation since then has gone backwards. As the country unravelled in the hands of the generals in the latter half of the twentieth century, women's rights took a similar nosedive.

As such, there are still effectively no laws protecting women from domestic violence, and rape is routinely used as a weapon of war in regional ethnic conflicts. In some rural areas, women have no inheritance rights, no sexual education, and no access to contraception.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×