Book contents
- The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics
- The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on Citations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Aesthetic Judgment and Beauty
- Part II Genius and the Fine Arts
- Part III Negative and Positive States
- Closing Reflections
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2024
Book contents
- The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics
- The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- A Note on Citations
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Aesthetic Judgment and Beauty
- Part II Genius and the Fine Arts
- Part III Negative and Positive States
- Closing Reflections
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Origins of Kant's Aesthetics , pp. 243 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Aagaard-Mogensen, Lars, ed. On the Ugly: Aesthetic Exchanges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019.Google Scholar
Adair, Stephanie. The Aesthetic Use of the Logical Functions of Kant’s Third Critique. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addison, Joseph and Steele, Richard. The Spectator; with Notes, and a General Index. The Eight Volumes Comprised in One. Philadelphia: Hickman and Hazzard, 1822.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “Ginsborg, Nature, and Normativity.” British Journal of Aesthetics 56, no. 4 (2016): 389–95.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae, 61 vols. Cambridge and New York: Blackfriars and McGraw-Hill, 1964–80.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Introduction to St. Thomas Aquinas, ed. Pegis, Anton. New York: The Modern Library, 1945.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Poetics, On the Sublime, On Style, ed. and trans. Halliwell, Stephen, Fyfe, W.H., Russell, Donald, Innes, Doreen C., and Roberts, W. Rhys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Meg. “‘The Effects of Blackness’: Gender, Race, and the Sublime in Aesthetic Theories of Burke and Kant.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54, no. 3 (1996): 213–36.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jeremy. “Laughter, Judgment and Democratic Politics.” Culture, Theory, & Critique 50, no. 1 (2009): 7–21.Google Scholar
Babich, Babette, ed. Reading David Hume’s “Of the Standard of Taste.” Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Baeumler, Alfred. Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Bd I. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Halle: M. Niemeyer, 1923.Google Scholar
Batteux, Charles. The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle, trans. James Young. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Initia philosophiae practicae primae acroamatice. Halle: Carl Hemmerde, 1760.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Texte zur Grundlegung der Ästhetik, ed. Schweizer, Hans Rudolf. Hamburg: Meiner, 1983.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Aesthetica/Ästhetik, ed. and trans. Mirbach, Dagmar. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysics, trans. Courtney Fugate and John Hymers. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Beattie, James. “An Essay on Laughter and Ludicrous Composition.” In Essays: On Poetry and Music, As They Affect the Mind. Edinburgh: William Creech, 1778, 319–486.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick. Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Berger, David. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory: The Beautiful and Agreeable. London: Bloomsbury, 2011.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Merrie. “How Many Feminists Does It Take to Make a Joke? Sexist Humor and What’s Wrong with It.” Hypatia 1, no. 1 (1986): 63–82.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, trans. Cloudesley Brereton and Fred Rothwell. Oxford: Macmillan, 1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, George. Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher: In Seven Dialogues: Containing an Apology for the Christian Religion, against Those Who Are Called Free-Thinkers. New Haven: Sidney’s Press, 1803.Google Scholar
Bett, Richard. “Beauty and Its Relation to Goodness in Stoicism.” In Ancient Models of Mind, ed. Nightingale, Andrea and Sedley, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 130–52.Google Scholar
Bodmer, Johann J. Kritische Betrachtungen über die poetische Gemälde der Dichter. Frankfurt: Athenäum, 1971.Google Scholar
Boileau, Nicolas (Despréaux). “Preface to His Translation of Longinus on the Sublime.” In The Sublime Reader, ed. Clewis, Robert R.. London: Bloomsbury, 2019, 58–61.Google Scholar
Bolzano, Bernard. Über den Begriff des Schönen: Eine philosophische Abhandlung. Prague: Borrosch and André, 1843.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard. “The Æsthetic Theory of Ugliness.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1, no. 3 (1890): 32–48.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard. Three Lectures on Aesthetics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar
Boswell, Terry. “On the Textual Authenticity of Kant’s Logic.” History and Philosophy of Logic 9, no. 2 (1988): 193–203.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.Google Scholar
Brady, Emily. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. Kritischer Kommentar zu Kants Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). Hamburg: Meiner, 1999.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte: Zu Edition, Ambtsgeschäften und Werk Immanuel Kants, Kant-Forschungen, vol. 5. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner, eds. Kant-Forschungen, vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner, 1987.Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela. “The Beauty of Science without the Science of Beauty: Kant and the Rationalists on the Aesthetics of Cognition.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 56, no. 2 (2018): 281–304.Google Scholar
Bruno, Paul. Kant’s Concept of Genius: Its Origin and Function in the Third Critique. London: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar
Buchenau, Stefanie. The Founding of Aesthetics in the German Enlightenment: The Art of Invention and the Invention of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. London: Dodsley, 1757.Google Scholar
Canivet, Michel. “Le rire et le bon sens.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 86, no. 3 (1988): 354–77.Google Scholar
Cannon, Joseph. “The Moral Value of Artistic Beauty in Kant.” Kantian Review 16, no. 1 (2011): 113–26.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. Humour: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard. “Kant’s Apology for Sensibility.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, ed. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 164–93.Google Scholar
Celkyte, Aiste. “The Stoic Definition of Beauty as Summetria.” Classical Quarterly 67, no. 1 (2017): 88–105.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. “Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85, no. 3 (2007): 415–33.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Greenberg, Kant, and Aesthetic Judgments of Modernist Art.” AE: Canadian Aesthetics Journal 18 (2008): 1–15.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “A Case for Kantian Artistic Sublimity: A Response to Abaci.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68, no. 2 (2010): 167–70.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Kant’s Distinction between True and False Sublimity.” In Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide, ed. Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 116–43.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “The Place of the Sublime in Kant’s Project.” Studi kantiani 28 (2015): 149–68.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Kant’s Natural Teleology? The Case of Physical Geography.” Kant-Studien 107, no. 2 (2016): l–29.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “What’s the Big Idea? On Emily Brady’s Sublime.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 50, no. 2 (2016): 104–18.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Beauty and Utility in Kant’s Aesthetics: The Origins of Adherent Beauty.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 56, no. 2 (2018): 305–36.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “The Feeling of Enthusiasm.” In Kant and the Faculty of Feeling, ed. Sorensen, Kelly and Williamson, Diane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 184–207.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Kant’s Physical Geography and the Critical Philosophy.” Epochē: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 22, no. 2 (2018): 411–27.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “On Serena Feloj’s Estetica del Disgusto.” Critique 2019: no pagination. https://virtualcritique.wordpress.com/2019/07/15/robert-r-clewis-on-serena-felojs-estetica-del-disgusto/ [Accessed August 19, 2021].Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “The Sources and Development of Kant’s Views on Aesthetic Normativity.” Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy 4 (2019): 1–19.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Towards a Theory of the Sublime and Aesthetic Awe.” In The Sublime Reader, ed. Clewis, Robert R.. London: Bloomsbury, 2019, 340–54.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “How to Distinguish and Reconcile Sensitive and Conceptual Taste.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics 43, no. 1 (2020): 43–53.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “The Importance of Translating Kant’s Physical Geography Lectures.” In Kants Schriften in Übersetzungen, ed. Schlüter, Gisela. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2020, 717–20.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. Kant’s Humorous Writings: An Illustrated Guide. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “The Majesty of Cognition: The Sublime in Baumgarten, Mendelssohn, and Kant.” In Baumgarten’s Aesthetics: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, ed. McQuillan, J. Colin. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021, 241–72.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Schwärmerei and Enthusiasmus in Recent English Translations of Kant’s Lectures and Writings on Anthropology.” In Kants Schriften in Übersetzungen, ed. Schlüter, Gisela. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2020, 649–75.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Why the Sublime is Aesthetic Awe.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79, no. 3 (2021): 301–14.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Aesthetic Normativity in Freiburg: Jonas Cohn as an Alternative to Kant.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 39, no. 2 (2022): 183–97.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Kant on the Fine Arts: Reply to a Social Practices Objection.” In Kantian Readings, ed. Dmitrieva, Nina. Dordrecht: Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. “Imagination, Vital Forces, and Self-Consciousness in the Kantian Sublime.” In Kant and the Feeling of Life, ed. Mensch, Jennifer. Albany: SUNY Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Coate, Matthew. “‘Nothing but Nonsense’: A Kantian Account of Ugliness.” British Journal of Aesthetics 58, no. 1 (2018): 51–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix. “Kant on the Possibility of Ugliness.” British Journal of Aesthetics 53, no. 2 (2013): 199–209.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix, ed. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Conrad, Elfriede. Kants Logikvorlesungen als neuer Schlüssel zur Architektonik der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1994.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy, ed. The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy. The Imagination in Hume’s Philosophy: The Canvas of the Mind. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “Kant and Greenberg’s Varieties of Aesthetic Formalism.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42, no. 4 (1984): 442–5.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. The Kantian Aesthetic: From Knowledge to the Avant Garde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O., ed. Kant and His German Contemporaries: Volume 2, Aesthetics, History, Politics, and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur. The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art. Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2003.Google Scholar
De Boer, Karin. Kant’s Reform of Metaphysics: The Critique of Pure Reason Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara and Sensen, Oliver, eds. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting, trans. Bennington, Geoffrey and McLeod, Ian. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Economimesis.” In Continental Aesthetics, ed. Kearney, Richard and Rasmussen, David M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, 431–51.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Passions of the Soul. In Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol. 1, trans. Haldane, Elizabeth and Ross, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. “Laideur.” Encyclopédie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. 9. Neuchâtel: Samuel Faulche, 1765, 176.Google Scholar
Dumouchel, Daniel. Kant et la genèse de la subjectivité esthétique: esthétique et philosophie avant la Critique de la faculté de juger. Paris: J. Vrin, 1999.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Richard. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Feloj, Serena. Estetica del disgusto: Mendelssohn, Kant e i limiti della rappresentazione. Roma: Carocci editore, 2017.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael. “Kant’s Philosophy of Language?” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 74, no. 3 (2012): 485–511.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology, ed. Nigro, Roberto. Cambridge, MA: Semiotext(e), 2007.Google Scholar
Fritz, Martin. Vom Erhabenen. Der Traktat ‘Peri Hybsous’ und seine aesthetisch-religiöse Renaissance im 18. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Mohr Siebek, 2011.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney D., ed. Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Gottfried. “Der ‘Witz’ der reflektierenden Urteilskraft.” In Urteilskraft und Heuristik in den Wissenschaften. Beiträge zur Entstehung des Neuen, ed. Rodi, Frithjof. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft, 2003, 197–210.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. “‘Kants Ästhetik, denke ich, eröffnet eine Möglichkeit, noch die Experimente der zeitgenössischen Kunst zu beurteilen’.” In Form: Zwischen Ästhetik und künstlerischer Praxis, ed. Armen, Avanessian, Stauffacher, Hans, Leeb, Susanne, and Hofmann, Franck. Zürich: Diaphanes, 2009, 285–98.Google Scholar
Gaut, Berys. “Education for Creativity.” In The Philosophy of Creativity: New Essays, ed. Paul, Eliot and Kaufman, Scott. New York: Oxford University Press, 265–87.Google Scholar
Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Taste: with Three Dissertations on the Same Subject by Mr. De Voltaire, Mr. D’Alembert, and Mr. De Montesquieu. London: A. Millar, A. Kincaid, and J. Bell, 1759.Google Scholar
Gerard, Alexander. Versuch über den Geschmack, trans. Flögel, Karl Friedrich. Breslau: Johann Ernst Meyer, 1766.Google Scholar
Gerard, Alexander. Versuch über das Genie, trans. Garve, Christian. Leipzig: Weidmann, 1776.Google Scholar
Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Genius, ed. Fabian, Bernhard. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1966.Google Scholar
Giamario, Patrick. “‘Making Reason Think More’: Laughter in Kant’s Aesthetic Philosophy.” Angelaki 22, no. 4 (2017): 161–76.Google Scholar
Gimbel, Steven. Isn’t That Clever: A Philosophical Account of Humor and Comedy. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Giordanetti, Piero. “Kant e Gerard: Nota sulle fonti storiche della teoria Kantiana del ‘genio’.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 46, no. 4 (1991): 661–99.Google Scholar
Giordanetti, Piero. “Kants Entdeckung der Aprioriät des Geschmacksurteils. Zur Genese der Kritik der Urteilskraft.” In Aufklärung und Interpretation. Studien zu Kants Philosophie und ihrem Umkreis, ed. Klemme, Heiner F, Ludwig, Bernd, Pauen, Michael, and Brandt, Reinhard. Würzburg: Konigshausen & Neumann, 1999, 171–96.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, Kristin. Herder’s Hermeneutics: History, Poetry, Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Goldthwait, John, ed. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime by Immanuel Kant. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Gracyk, Theodore. “Kant’s Shifting Debt to British Aesthetics.” British Journal of Aesthetics 26, no. 3 (1986): 204–17.Google Scholar
Gracyk, Theodore. “Sublimity, Ugliness, and Formlessness in Kant’s Aesthetic Theory.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45, no. 1 (1986): 49–56.Google Scholar
Graham, Daniel J. and Redies, Christoph. “Statistical Regularities in Art: Relations with Visual Coding and Perception.” Vision Research 50, no. 16 (2010): 1503–9.Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary. “Aesthetic Form and Sensory Content in the Critique of Judgment: Can Kant’s ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgment’ Provide a Philosophical Basis for Modern Formalism?” In The Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, ed. Kennington, Richard. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1985, 185–99.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Grote, Simon. The Emergence of Modern Aesthetic Theory: Religion and Morality in Enlightenment Germany and Scotland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Thomson’s Problems with Kant: A Comment on ‘Kant’s Problems with Ugliness’.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50, no. 4 (1992): 317–9.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays in Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Beauty, Freedom, and Morality: Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology and the Development of His Aesthetic Theory.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, ed. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 135–64.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant on the Purity of the Ugly.” In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 141–62.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Genius and Taste: A Response to Joseph Cannon, ‘The Moral Value of Artistic Beauty in Kant’.” Kantian Review 16, no. 1 (2011): 127–34.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9, no. 1 (2011): 59–93.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. A History of Modern Aesthetics, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Play and Society in the Lectures on Anthropology.” In Reading Kant’s Lectures, ed. Clewis, Robert R.. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015, 223–41.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Aesthetics in his Lectures on Metaphysics.” In Kant’s Lectures on Metaphysics: A Critical Guide, ed. Fugate, Courtney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 156–78.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Reason and Experience in Mendelssohn and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul and Allen, Wood. “Interview with Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood.” In Kants Schriften in Übersetzungen, ed. Schlüter, Gisela. Hamburg: Meiner, 2020, 53–72.Google Scholar
Hammermeister, Kai. The German Aesthetic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hartley, David. “Of Wit and Humour.” In The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor, ed. Morreall, John. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hayn-Leichsenring, Gregor and Chatterjee, Anjan. “Colliding Terminological Systems – Immanuel Kant and Contemporary Empirical Aesthetics.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 37, no. 2 (2019): 197–219.Google Scholar
Henderson, Gretchen E. “The Ugly Face Club: A Case Study in the Tangled Politics and Aesthetics of Deformity.” In Ugliness, ed. Pop, Andrei and Widrich, Mechtild. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014, 17–33.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. Konstellationen. Probleme und Debatten am Ursprung der idealistischen Philosophie (1789–1795). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1991.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sämtliche Werke, 33 vols., ed. Suphan, Bernhard. Berlin: Weidmann, 1877–1913.Google Scholar
Hills, Alison and Bird, Alexander. “Against Creativity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99, no. 3 (2019): 694–713.Google Scholar
Hills, Alison and Bird, Alexander. “Creativity without Value.” In The Routledge Handbook on Creativity and Philosophy, ed. Gaut, Berys and Kieran, Matthew. New York: Routledge, 2018, 95–107.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. The Treatise on Human Nature and That on Liberty and Necessity. London: McCreery, 1812.Google Scholar
Hogarth, William. The Analysis of Beauty, ed. Paulson, Ronald. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Holt, Jim. Stop Me If You’ve Heard This: A History and Philosophy of Jokes. New York: W.W. Norton, 2008.Google Scholar
Home, Henry (Lord Kames). Elements of Criticism, ed. Jones, Peter, 2 vols. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
Hounsokou, Annie. “Exposing the Rogue in Us.” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16, no. 2 (2012): 317–36.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise on Human Nature and Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1874.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Enquiries concerning the Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L.A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the Standard of Taste.” In Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1987, 226–49.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “The Sceptic.” In Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1987, 159–80.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Other Writings, ed. Coleman, Dorothy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue in Two Treatises, ed. Leidhold, Wolfgang. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jonathan. “Understandings of Ugliness in Kant’s Aesthetics.” In On the Ugly: Aesthetic Exchanges, ed. Aagaard-Mogensen, Lars and Forsey, Jane. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019, 47–66.Google Scholar
Juchem, Hans-Georg. Die Entwicklung des Begriffs des Schönen bei Kant unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Begriffs der verworrenen Erkenntnis. Bonn: H. Bouvier, 1970.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1900–.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, trans. Creed Meredith., James Oxford: Clarendon, 1911.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Die philosophischen Hauptvorlesungen Immanuel Kants. Nach den aufgefundenen Kollegheften des Grafen Heinrich zu Dohna-Wundlacken, ed. Kowalewski, Arnold. Munich and Leipzig: Rösl, 1924.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy before 1770, ed. and trans. Walford, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Correspondence, trans. Zweig, Arnulf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Notes and Fragments: Logic, Metaphysics, Moral Philosophy, Aesthetics, ed. Guyer, Paul, trans. Bowman, Curtis, Guyer, Paul, and Rauscher, Frederick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology, ed. Wood, Allen W and Louden, Robert B, trans. Clewis, Robert R, Louden, Robert B, Felicitas Munzel, G., and Wood, Allen W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Kants Vorlesungen über Anthropologie. www.online.uni-marburg.de/kant_old/webseitn/gt_ho304.htm# [Accessed September 24, 2021].Google Scholar
Kirwan, James. Sublimity: The Non-Rational and the Irrational in the History of Aesthetics. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. “Kant and the Affektenlehre.” In The Fine Art of Repetition: Essays in the Philosophy of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 250–64.Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. De Gustibus: Arguing About Taste and Why We Do It. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “On Dealing with Kant’s Sexism and Racism.” SGIR Review 2, no. 2 (2019): 3–22.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Me, My Will, and I: Kant’s Republican Conception of Freedom of the Will and Freedom of the Agent.” Studi Kantiani 33 (2020): 103–123.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner and Manfred, Kuehn, eds. The Reception of British Aesthetics in Germany: Seven Significant Translations, 1745–1776, 7 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes, 2001.Google Scholar
Koller, Aaron. “Mendelssohn’s Response to Burke on the Sublime.” In Moses Mendelssohn’s Metaphysics and Aesthetics, ed. Munk, Reinier. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, 329–50.Google Scholar
Korsmeyer, Carolyn. Savoring Disgust: The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics, Part I.” Journal of the History of Ideas 12, no. 4 (1951): 496–527.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics, Part II.” Journal of the History of Ideas 13, no. 1 (1952): 17–46.Google Scholar
Kronfeldner, Maria. “Explaining Creativity.” In The Routledge Handbook on Creativity and Philosophy, ed. Gaut, Berys and Kieran, Matthew. New York: Routledge, 2018, 213–229.Google Scholar
Küplen, Mojca. “Disgust and Ugliness: a Kantian Perspective.” Contemporary Aesthetics 9, article 10 (2011): no pagination. https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol9/iss1/10 [Accessed August 29, 2021]Google Scholar
Küplen, Mojca. Beauty, Ugliness and the Free Play of Imagination: An Approach to Kant’s Aesthetics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Küplen, Mojca. “Kant’s Theory of Laughter.” Debates in Aesthetics 16, no. 1 (2021): 50–62.Google Scholar
Landmann–Kalischer, Edith. “Über den Erkenntniswert ästhetischer Urteile: Ein Vergleich zwischen Sinnes- und Werturteilen.” Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie (1905): 263–328.Google Scholar
Lanford, Michael. “Ravel and ‘The Raven’: The Realisation of an Inherited Aesthetic in Bolero.” Cambridge Quarterly 40, no. 3 (2011): 243–65.Google Scholar
Larkin-Galiñanes, Cristina. “An Overview of Humor Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. Attardo, Salvatore. New York: Routledge, 2017, 4–16.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Confessio philosophi: ein Dialog, ed. Saame, Otto. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1994.Google Scholar
Leppert, Richard. “Ugly.” In German Aesthetics: Fundamental Concepts from Baumgarten to Adorno, ed. Mininger, J.D. and Peck, Jason Michael, London: Bloomsbury, 2016, 219–26.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Selected Prose Works, ed. Bell, Edward. London: George Bell and Sons, 1889.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocöon, An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry, trans. Allen McCormick, Edward. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar
Lohmar, Dieter. “Das Geschmacksurteil über das faszinierend Häßliche.” In Kants Ästhetik, Kant’s Aesthetics, L’esthetique de Kant, ed. Parret, Herman. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1998, 498–512.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. “Constructing a Demonstration of Logical Rules, or How to Use Kant’s Logic Corpus.” In Reading Kant’s Lectures, ed. Clewis, Robert R.. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015, 137–58.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping. Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Makkai, Katalin. Kant’s Critique of Taste: The Feeling of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the “Critique of Judgment.” Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Marmysz, John. “Humor, Sublimity and Incongruity.” Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 2, no. 3 (2001): no pagination. www.dmd27.org/marm.html [Accessed August 26, 2109].Google Scholar
Marmysz, John. Laughing at Nothing: Humor as a Response to Nihilism. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Martin, Mike W. “Humour and Aesthetic Enjoyment of Incongruities.” British Journal of Aesthetics 23, no. 1 (1983): 74–85.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha. “Edith Landmann-Kalischer on Aesthetic Demarcation and Normativity.” British Journal of Aesthetics 60, no. 3 (2020): 315–34.Google Scholar
McConnell, Sean. “How Kant Might Explain Ugliness.” British Journal of Aesthetics 48, no. 2 (2008): 205–28.Google Scholar
McQuillan, J. Colin. “The Science of Aesthetics, the Critique of Taste, and the Philosophy of Art: Ambiguities and Contradictions.” Aesthetic Investigations 4, no. 2 (2021): 144–62.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. Anfangsgründe aller schönen Wissenschaften, Zweyter Theil. Halle: Carl Hemmerde, 1749.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. Thoughts on Jesting, ed. Jones, Joseph. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. “On the Sublime and Naive in the Fine Sciences.” In The Sublime Reader, ed. Clewis, Robert R.. London: Bloomsbury, 2019, 91–100.Google Scholar
Meredith, James Creed, trans. Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Oxford: Clarendon, 1911.Google Scholar
Mirbach, Dagmar. “Magnitudo aesthetica, Aesthetic Greatness: Ethical Aspects of Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s Fragmentary Aesthetica.” The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics nos. 36–7 (2008/2009): 102–28.Google Scholar
Monk, Samuel. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1935.Google Scholar
Morreall, John, ed. The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. “Kant in the Classroom.” https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Home/index.htm [Accessed September 7, 2021]Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. “Kant in the Classroom: Anthropology.” https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesAnthropology.htm [Accessed October 4, 2021].Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. “Kant in the Classroom: Dohna-Wundlacken.” https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesAnthropology.htm#Dohna-Wundlacken1 [Accessed October 6, 2021].Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. “Kant in the Classroom: Logic Notes.” https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesLogic.htm [Accessed July 25, 2021].Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. “Kant in the Classroom: Moral Philosophy Notes.” https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Notes/notesMoral.htm [Accessed October 3, 2021].Google Scholar
Nichols, Stephen G. “Laughter as Gesture: Hilarity and the Anti-Sublime.” Neohelicon 32, no. 2 (2005): 375–89.Google Scholar
Olin, Lauren. “All in Good Taste.” Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 4. Berlin: de Gruyter, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ostaric, Lara. “Genius and the ‘Moral Image of the World’: The Artist and Her Work as a Source of Moral Motivation.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants: Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, ed. Ruffing, Margit, de Almeida, Guido, Terra, Ricardo, and Rohden, Valerio. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008, 667–76.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. “A Liar’s Guide to Humor: Kant on Paradoxical Playing with Perspectives.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Paris, Panos. “The Deformity-Related Conception of Ugliness.” British Journal of Aesthetics 57, no. 2 (2017): 139–60.Google Scholar
Park, Kap H. Kant über das Erhabene: Rekonstruktion und Weiterführung der kritischen Theorie des Erhabenen Kants. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2009.Google Scholar
Pascal, Roy. The German Sturm und Drang. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Phillips, James. “Placing Ugliness in Kant’s Third Critique: A Reply to Paul Guyer.” Kant-Studien 102, no. 3 (2011): 385–95.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk. Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Pinder, Tillman. “Zu Kants Logik-Vorlesung um 1780, anläßlich einer neu aufgefundenen Nachschrift.” In Kant-Forschungen, ed. Brandt, Reinhard and Stark, Werner. Kant-Forschungen, vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner, 1987, 79–114.Google Scholar
Plato, . Complete Works, ed. Cooper, J. M and Hutchinson, D. S. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Pollack, John. The Pun Also Rises: How the Humble Pun Revolutionized Language, Changed History, and Made Wordplay More Than Some Antics. New York: Penguin, 2011.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin. Kant’s Theory of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Pollok, Anne. “Gazing Upwards to the Stage: Mendelssohn’s Notion of Admiration and Its Consequences.” In The Moral Psychology of Admiration, ed. Archer, Alfred and Grahle, André. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2019, 79–94.Google Scholar
Procuranti, Lucia. La percezione del bello da Descartes a Kant. Trento: Verifiche, 2009.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit. “So lachen wir: Wie Immanuel Kant Leib und Seele zusammenhält.” In Kants Schlüssel zur Kritik des Geschmacks. Ästhetische Erfahrung heute – Studien zur Aktualität von Kants “Kritik der Urteilskraft,” ed. Francke, Ursula. Hamburg: Meiner, 2000, 177–87.Google Scholar
Redies, Christoph. “Beauty: Neglected, but Alive and Kicking.” British Journal of Psychology 105, no. 4 (2014): 468–70.Google Scholar
Ritzel, Wolfgang. “Kant über den Witz und Kants Witz.” Kant-Studien 82, no. 1 (1991): 102–9.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, Karl. Aesthetics of Ugliness, trans. Pop, Andrei and Widrich, Mechtild. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Rueger, Alexander. “Beautiful Surfaces: Kant on Free and Adherent Beauty in Nature and Art.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16, no. 3 (2008): 535–57.Google Scholar
Scarré, Geoffrey. “Kant on Free and Dependent Beauty.” British Journal of Aesthetics 21, no. 4 (1981): 351–62.Google Scholar
Schlapp, Otto. Kants Lehre vom Genie und die Entstehung der ʻKritik der Urteilskraft’. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1901.Google Scholar
Schöndörffer, Otto. Kant’s Briefwechsel, ed. Malter, Rudolf and Kopper., Joachim Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, trans. Payne, E. F. J, 2 vols. New York: Dover, 1969.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, (Anthony Ashley Cooper). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, ed. Klein, Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld and Velkley, Richard, eds. Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Shier, David. “Why Kant Finds Nothing Ugly.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38, no. 4 (1998): 412–8.Google Scholar
Simonton, Dean K. “So You Want to Become a Creative Genius? You Must Be Crazy!” The Dark Side of Creativity, ed. Cropley, David H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Kelly and Williamson, Diane. Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Steenhagen, Maarten. “Explaining the Ugly: Disharmony and Unrestrained Cognition in Kant.” Esthetica 11 (2010): no pagination. http://estheticatijdschrift.nl/files/2014/09/09/3-Esthetica-ExplainingtheUgly-Disharmonyand-UnrestrainedCognitioninKant-2010-11-24.pdf [Accessed January 5, 2022]Google Scholar
Strub, Christian. “Das Häßliche und die ‘Kritik der ästhetischen Urteilskraft’: Überlegungen zu einer systematischen Lücke.” Kant-Studien 80 (1989): 416–46.Google Scholar
Swabey, Marie. “The Comic as Nonsense, Sadism, or Incongruity.” Journal of Philosophy 55, no. 19 (1958): 819–33.Google Scholar
Swift, Paul. “In-jestion: Intestinal Laughter in Kant and Nietzsche.” International Studies in Philosophy 27, no. 1 (1995): 97–103.Google Scholar
Tatarkiewicz, Władysław. A History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1980.Google Scholar
Thomson, Garrett. “Kant’s Problems with Ugliness.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50, no. 2 (1992): 107–15.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Oliver. “Kant’s ‘Theory of Music’.” Con-textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2021): 416–38.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. “La formazione del testo della Kritik der Urteilskraft.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 8, no. 4 (1954): 423–48.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. “Kant’s Early Theory of Genius Pt. 1 (1770–1779).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4, no. 2 (1966): 109–32.Google Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. “Kant’s Early Theory of Genius Pt. 2 (1770–1779).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4, no. 3 (1966): 209–24.Google Scholar
Townsend, Dabney. Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics. Amityville, NY: Baywood Pub, 1999.Google Scholar
Townsend, Dabney. Hume’s Aesthetic Theory: Taste and Sentiment. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Tumarkin, Anna. “Zur transscendentalen Methode der Kantischen Asthetik.” Kant-Studien 11, no. 1–3 (1906): 348–78.Google Scholar
Tuna, Emine Hande. “Self-Standing Beauty: Tracing Kant’s Views on Purpose-Based Beauty.” Southwest Philosophy Review 35, no. 1 (2019): 7–16.Google Scholar
Warda, Arthur. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Mit einer getreuen Nachbildung des bisher einzigen bekannten Abzuges des Versteigerungskataloges der Bibliothek Kants. Berlin: Martin Breslauer, 1922.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Christian. “Kant Finds Nothing Ugly?” British Journal of Aesthetics 39, no. 4 (1999): 416–22.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Christian. “Beauty, Genius, and Mathematics: Why Did Kant Change his Mind?” History of Philosophy Quarterly 18, no. 4 (2001): 415–32.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Christian. An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Christian. “Do Negative Judgments of Taste Have a priori Grounds in Kant?” Kant-Studien 103, no. 4 (2012): 472–93.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Christian. “The Art of Doing Mathematics.” In The Routledge Handbook on Creativity and Philosophy, ed. Gaut, Berys and Kieran, Matthew. New York: Routledge, 2018, 313–30.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Kant on Fine Art: Artistic Sublimity Shaped by Beauty.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53, no. 2 (1995): 189–93.Google Scholar
Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty as the Appreciation of Teleological Style.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55, no. 4 (1997): 387–400.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics: The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Vernünfftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen (“German Metaphysics”). Halle: Renger, 1720.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Psychologia empirica, methodo scientifica pertractata. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Renger, 1738.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General, trans. Blackwell, Richard J. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicolas. Art Rethought: The Social Practices of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Young, Edward. Conjectures on Original Composition: In a Letter to the Author of Sir Charles Grandison. London: Millar and Dodsley, 1759.Google Scholar
Young, James O. “Kant’s Musical Antiformalism.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78, no. 2 (2020): 171–82.Google Scholar
Young, Michael, trans. Kant, Immanuel, Lectures on Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “‘Without Hope and Fear’: Kant’s Naturrecht Feyerabend on Bindingness and Obligation.” In Reading Kant’s Lectures, ed. Clewis, Robert R. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015, 346–61.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “A New Look at Kant’s Theory of Pleasure.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60, no. 3 (2002): 239–52.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “The Purposiveness of Form: A Reading of Kant’s Aesthetic Formalism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44, no. 4 (2006): 599–622.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “Kant’s Rationalist Aesthetics.” Kant-Studien 98, no. 4 (2007): 443–63.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “Kant on Practical Fanaticism.” In Kant’s Moral Metaphysics, ed. Lipscomb, Benjamin and Krueger, James. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010, 291–318.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. Herder’s Naturalist Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar