Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade The Interface between the Right to Regulate and WTO Law
Book contents
- Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Book part
- Table of cases
- Introduction
- Part I Optimal regulation and international trade law – theory
- Part II Optimal regulation and international trade law – application
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2015
Book contents
- Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade
- Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law
- Optimal Regulation and the Law of International Trade
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword
- Book part
- Table of cases
- Introduction
- Part I Optimal regulation and international trade law – theory
- Part II Optimal regulation and international trade law – application
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Optimal Regulation and the Law of International TradeThe Interface between the Right to Regulate and WTO Law, pp. 271 - 287Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Abel-Koch, J., ‘Endogenous Trade Policy with Heterogeneous Firms’ (2010) CDSE Discussion Paper No. 93.Google Scholar
Åhman, J., Trade, Health and the Burden of Proof in WTO Law (Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer, 2012).Google Scholar
Akerloff, G., ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality, Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldred, J., ‘Climate Change Uncertainty, Irreversibility and the Precautionary Principle’ (2012) 36 Cambridge Journal of Economics 1051–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemanno, A., ‘Public Perception of Food Safety Risks under WTO Law: A Normative Perspective’, in: van Calster, G. and Prévost, D. (eds) Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO (Cheltenham, Elgar Publishing, 2013) chapter 9.Google Scholar
Allais, M., ‘Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine’ (1953) 21 Econometrica 503–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. and Lopez, R.A., ‘Exporting and Performance: Evidence from Chilean Plants’ (2005) 38 Canadian Journal of Economics 1384–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anders, S. and Caswell, J., ‘Standards as Barriers versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports’ (2009) 91 American Journal of Agricultural Economics 310–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E.L. and St. Hilaire, C., ‘The Contrast between Risk Assessment and Rules of Evidence in the Context of International Trade Disputes: Can the U.S. Experience Inform the Process?’ (2004) 24 Risk Analysis 449–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansolobehere, S., de Figueriedo, J.M. and Snyder, J.M., ‘Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. Politics?’ (2003) 17 Journal of Economic Perspectives 105−30.Google Scholar
Antle, J.M., ‘Benefits and Costs of Food Safety Regulation’ (1999) 24 Food Policy 605–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antle, J.M., ‘No Such Thing as a Free Lunch: The Cost of Food Safety Regulation in the Meat Industry’ (2000) 82 American Journal of Agricultural Economics 310–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antràs, P. and Staiger, R., ‘Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements’ (2012) 102 American Economic Review 3140–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K.J., ‘A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare’ (1950) 58 Journal of Political Economy 328–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K.J., ‘The Theory of Risk Aversion’, in: Arrow, K.J., Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing, 1971) 90–120.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. and Debreu, G., ‘Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy’ (1954) 22 Econometrica 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K.J. and Hurwicz, L., ‘An Optimality Criterion for Decision Making under Ignorance’, in: Carter, C.F. and Ford, J.L. (eds) Uncertainty and Expectation in Economics: Essays in Honour of G.L.S. Shackles (Oxford, Blackwell, 1972) 1–11.Google Scholar
Atik, J., ‘The Weakest Link: Demonstrating the Inconsistency of “Appropriate Levels of Protection” in Australia – Salmon’ (2004) 24 Risk Analysis 483–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. Mavroidis, P.C., and Staiger, R., ‘It’s a Question of Market Access’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’ (1999) 89 American Economic Review 215–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., ‘Domestic Policies, National Sovereignty and International Economic Institutions’ (2001) 116 Quarterly Journal of Economics 519–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge/Mass., MIT Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., ‘Delocation and Trade Agreements in Imperfectly Competitive Markets’ (2009) NBER Working Paper No. 15444.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., ‘Profit Shifting and Trade Agreements in Imperfectly Competitive Markets’ (2009) NBER Working Paper No. 14308.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., ‘The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice’ (2010) 2 Annual Review of Economics 223–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R., ‘What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization’ (2011) 101 American Economic Review 1238–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balassa, B., Trade Liberalization among Industrial Countries (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1967).Google Scholar
Barber, B.M. and Odean, T., ‘Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence and Common Stock Investment’ (2006) 116 Quarterly Journal of Economics 261–92.Google Scholar
Bartels, L., ‘Trade and Human Rights’, in: McRae, D., Bethlehem, D.L., Neufeldt, R.W. and Van Damme, I. (eds) Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009) 572–96.Google Scholar
Battigalli, P. and Maggi, G., ‘International Agreements on Product Standards: An Incomplete Contracting-Theory’ (2003) NBER Working Paper No. 9533.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S., Grossman, M. and Murphy, K.M., ‘An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction’ (1996) 84 American Economic Review 396–418.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. and Murphy, K.M., ‘A Theory of Rational Addiction’ (1988) 96 Journal of Political Economy 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, J.H., ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More’ (1996) 90 American Journal of International Law 416–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennet, P., ‘Understanding Reponses to Risk: Some Basic Findings’, in: Bennet, P. and Calman, K. (eds) Risk Communication and Public Health (1999) 3–19.Google Scholar
Berger, M.C., Blomquist, G.C., Kenkel, D. and Tolley, G.S., ‘Valuing Changes in Health Risks: A Comparison of Alternative Measures’ (1987) 53 Southern Journal of Economics 967–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermann, G. and Mavroidis, P.C. (eds) Trade and Human Health and Safety (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J.L., Decision Theory and Rationality (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B. and Schott, P.K., ‘Trade Costs, Firms and Productivity’ (2006) 53 Journal of Monetary Economics 917–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B.D. and Rangel, A., ‘Addiction and Cue-triggered Decision Processes’ (2004) 94 American Economic Review 1558–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernoulli, D., ‘Exposition of a New Theory of Measuring Risk’ (1954) 22 Econometrica 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, M.H. and Schmidt, U., ‘An Experimental Investigation of Violations of Transitivity in Choice under Uncertainty’ (2008) 37 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohanes, J., ‘Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-Based Approach to the Precautionary Principle’ (2001–2002) 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 323–89.Google Scholar
Bohanes, J., ‘Comment: United States – Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry from China: The Fascinating Case that wasn’t’ (2012) 11 World Trade Review 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, C.P. and Trachtman, J.P., ‘Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres: A Balancing Act?’ (2009) 8 World Trade Review 85–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brealey, R.A., Myers, S.C. and Allen, F., Principles of Corporate Finance 10th Ed. (New York, McGrew-Hill Irwin, 2011).Google Scholar
Broda, C., Limão, N. and Weinstein, D.E., ‘Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence’ (2008) 98 American Economic Review 2032–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J., Ethics out of Economics (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broude, T., ‘Genetically Modified Rules: The Awkward Rule-Exception-Right Distinction in EC – Biotech’ (2007) 6 World Trade Review 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broude, T. and Levy, P.I., ‘Do You Mind if I don’t Smoke? Products, Purpose and Indeterminacy in US – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes’ (2014) 13 World Trade Review 357–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J.W., Slovic, P., Kasperson, R., Kasperson, J.X., Renn, O. and Scrinvas, E., ‘Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk: Implications for Theory Construction and Decision Making’ (1993) 13 Risk Analysis 611–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bustos, P., ‘Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firm’ (2011) 101 American Economic Review 304–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, C., The Power to Protect: Trade Health and Uncertainty in the WTO (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Calvin, L. and Krissoff, B., ‘Technical Barriers to Trade: A Case Study of Phytosanitary Barriers and US – Japanese Apple Trade’ (1998) 23 Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 351–66.Google Scholar
Camerer, C.F. and Kunreuther, H., ‘Decision Processes for Low Probability Events: Policy Implications’ (1989) 8 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 565–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R., Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Cass, D.Z., ‘The Constitutionalization of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, J. and Coleman, G., ‘Optimistic Bias: What You Think, What You Know, or Whom You Know’ (2009) 11 North American Journal of Psychology 121–32.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S., ‘The Law of Environmental PPMs in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of WTO Illegality’ (2002) 27 Yale Journal of International Law 59–110.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S., ‘An Analysis of Pascal Lamy’s Proposal on Collective Preferences’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, C.R., ‘The EC – Biotech Dispute and Applicability of the SPS Agreement: Are the Panel’s Findings Built on Shaky Grounds?’ (2007) 6 World Trade Review 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, C.R., Process and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.C. and Kovacic, W.E., ‘Behavioral Economics – Implications for Regulatory Behavior’ (2012) 41 Journal of Regulatory Economics 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, S. and Jackson, J.H., ‘WTO Dispute Procedure, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Government’ (1996) 90 American Journal of International Law 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, M.A. and Howse, R., ‘Tuna – Dolphin II: A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Appellate Body Report (2014) 13 World Trade Review 321–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, W.J., ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body Decision in the Hormones Case and the Meaning of the SPS Agreement’, in: Bermann, G. and Mavroidis, P.C. (eds) Trade and Human Health and Safety (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006) 118–32.Google Scholar
Davey, W.J. and Maskus, K.E., ‘Thailand – Cigarettes (Philippines): A More Serious Role for the ‘Less Favourable Treatment’ Standard of Article III:4’ (2013) 12 World Trade Review 163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G., ‘Morality Clauses and Decision Making in Situations of Scientific Uncertainty’ (2007) 6 World Trade Review 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A., ‘Interpreting the Chapeau of GATT Article XX in Light of the ‘New’ Approach in Brazil – Retreaded Tyres’ (2009) 43 Journal of World Trade 507–39.Google Scholar
De Finetti, B., ‘Probabilism: A Critical Essay on the Theory of Probability and on the Value of Science’ (1989) 31 Erkenntnis 169–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Finetti, B., Theory of Probability: A Critical Introductory Treatment, Vol. 1 (Chichester, Interscience Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar
De Groot, M.H., Optimal Statistical Decisions (Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, S., ‘Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field’ (2009) 47 Journal of Economic Literature 315–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dequech, D., ‘Bounded Rationality, Institutions and Uncertainty’ (2001) 35 Journal of Economic Issues 911–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der Kiureghian, A. and Ditlevsen, O., ‘Aleatory or Epistemic? Does It Matter?’ (2009) 31 Structural Safety 105–12.Google Scholar
DiMascio, N. and Pauwelyn, J., ‘Non-Discrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or two Side of the Same Coin?’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 48–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, M.M., ‘Standard of Review under the SPS Agreement after EC – Hormones II’ (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, M.M., ‘Autonomy in Setting Appropriate Level of Protection under the WTO Law: Rhetoric or Reality?’ (2010) 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1077–102.Google Scholar
Du, M.M., ‘The Rise of National Regulatory Autonomy in the GATT/WTO Regime’ (2011) 14 Journal of International Economic Law 639–75.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J., ‘Lotus Eaters: Reflections on the Varietals Dispute, the SPS Agreement and WTO Dispute Resolution’, in: Bermann, G. and Mavroidis, P.C. (eds) Trade and Human Health and Safety (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006) 153–89.Google Scholar
Ehlermann, C.D. and Lockhart, N., ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law 491–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehring, L., ‘De Facto Discrimination in World Trade Law: National and Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment – or Equal Treatment’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 921–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, D., ‘Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms’ (1961) 75 Quarterly Journal of Economics 643–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epps, T., International Trade and Health Protection: A Critical Assessment of the WTO’s SPS Agreement (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epps, T., ‘Reconciling Public Opinion and WTO Rules under the SPS Agreement’ (2008) 7 World Trade Review 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, W.J., ‘The Theory of Trade Policy and Trade Agreements: A Critique’ (2004) 23 European Journal of Political Economy 605–27.Google Scholar
Ethier, W.J., ‘The Political-Support Approach to Trade Agreements’ (2012) 1 Global Journal of Economics 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier, W.J., ‘The Trade Agreement Embarrassment’ (2013) 17 Journal of East-Asian Economic Integration 243–60.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S.L. and Keeney, R.L. (eds) Acceptable Risk (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Flett, J., ‘If in Doubt, Leave It Out? EU Precaution in WTO Regulatory Space’ (2010) 1 European Journal of Risk Regulation 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flett, J., ‘WTO Space for National Regulation: Requiem for a Diagonal Vector Test’ (2013) 16 Journal of International Economic Law 37–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Footer, M.E., ‘Post-Normal Science in the Multilateral Trading System: Social Science Expertise and the EC – Biotech Panel’ (2007) 6 World Trade Review 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C.E., ‘Public Opinion and the Interpretation of the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’ (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 427–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, S. and Fischhoff, B., ‘Scope (In)Sensitivity in Elicited Values’ (1998) 3 Risk Decision Policy 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M., ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, in: Friedman, M. (ed.) Essays in Positive Economics (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1953) 3–43.Google Scholar
Gawande, K., Krishna, P. and Olarreaga, M., ‘What Governments Maximize and Why: The View from Trade’ (2009) 63 International Organization 491–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, I., Theory of Decision under Uncertainty (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E.L., ‘Paternalism and Psychology’ (2006) 73 University of Chicago Law Review 133–56.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P.K. and Maggi, G., ‘Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation’ (1999) 89 American Economic Review 1135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C., The Economics of Risk and Time (Cambridge/Mass., MIT Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C., ‘Whom Should We Believe? Aggregation and Heterogeneous Beliefs’ (2007) 35 Journal of Riks and Uncertainty 107–27.Google Scholar
Gollier, C., Jullien, B. and Treich, N., ‘Scientific Progress and Irreversibility: An Economic Interpretation of the Precautionary Principle’ (2000) 75 Journal of Public Economics 229–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C. and Treich, N., ‘Decision-Making under Scientific Uncertainty: The Economics of the Precautionary Principle’ (2003) 27 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. and Epps, T., ‘The WTO, Science and the Environment: Moving Towards Consistency’ (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law 285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. and Epps, T., ‘How Deep Should We Go? Searching for an Appropriate Standard of Review in SPS Cases’ (2011) 1 European Journal of Risk Regulation 111–4.Google Scholar
Green, A. and Epps, T., ‘United States: Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry from China – Just Another SPS Case?’ (2011) 3 European Journal of Risk Regulation 432–7.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E., ‘Protection for Sale’ (1994) 84 American Economic Review 833–50.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Horn, H., ‘Why the WTO? An introduction to the Economics of Trade Agreements’, in: Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P.C. (eds) Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2013) 9–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G., Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P.C., ‘National Treatment’, in: Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P.C. (eds) Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2013) 205–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. and Koszegi, B., ‘Is Addiction Rational? Theory and Evidence’ (2001) 116 Quarterly Journal of Economics 1261–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruszczynski, L., Regulating Health and Environmental Risk under WTO Law: A Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, S. and Roy, D., ‘National Treatment and the Optimal Regulation of Environmental Externalities’ (2008) 41 Canadian Journal of Economics 1445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, R.W., ‘The Economic Analysis of Regulation: A Response to the Critics’ (2004) 71 University of Chicago Law Review 1021–54.Google Scholar
Hahn, R.W. and Hird, J., ‘The Costs and Benefits of Regulation: Review and Synthesis’ (1991) 8 Yale Journal on Regulation 233–78.Google Scholar
Hammitt, J.K., Wiener, J.B., Swedlow, B., Kall, D. and Zhou, Z., ‘Precautionary Regulation in Europe and the United States: A Quantitative Comparison’ (2005) 25 Risk Analysis 1215–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, P.K.J., Klein, W.M.P. and Arora, N.K.,‘Varieties of Uncertainty in Health Care’ (2011) 31 Medical Decision Making 828–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanemann, , ‘Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation’ (1994) 8 Journal of Economic Perspective 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harremoës, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B. and Vaz, S.G., Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000 (Copenhagen, European Environmental Agency, 2001).Google Scholar
Harrington, W. and Portney, P.R., ‘Valuing the Benefits of Health and Safety Regulation’ (1987) 22 Journal of Urban Economics 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J.C., ‘On the Rationale of the Bayesian Approach: Comments’, in: Butts, R.E. and Hintikka, J. (eds) Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences (Dodrecht, D. Reidel Publishing, 1977).Google Scholar
Helpman, E., Understanding Global Trade (Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. and Trachtman, J.P., ‘Continued Suspense: EC-Hormones and WTO Disciplines on Discrimination and Domestic Regulation’ (2010) 9 World Trade Review (2010) 151–80.Google Scholar
Horn, H., ‘National Treatment in the GATT’ (2006) 96 American Economic Review 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H., ‘The Burden of Proof in Trade Disputes and the Environment’ 62 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (2011) 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P.C., ‘Burden of Proof in Environmental Disputes in the WTO: Legal Aspects’ (2009) European Energy and Environmental Law Review 112–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H., Maggi, G. and Staiger, R., ‘Trade Agreements as Endogenously Incomplete Contracts’ (2010) 100 American Economic Review 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R., ‘Democracy, Science and Free Trade: Risk Regulation on Trial at the World Trade Organization’ (2000) 98 Michigan Law Review 2329–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R., ‘Human Rights in the WTO: Whose Rights? What Humanity? Comments on Petersmann’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 651–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. and Horn, H., ‘European Communities-Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products’ (2009) 8 World Trade Review 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. and Levy, P.I., ‘The TBT Panels: US – Cloves, US – Tuna, US – COOL’ (2013) 12 World Trade Review 327–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. and Turk, E., ‘The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations: A Case Study of the Canada-EC Asbestos Dispute’ in Berman, G. and Mavroidis, PC. (eds) Trade and Human Health and Safety (New York, cambridge University Press, 2006) 77–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, R.H., Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System (Salem, Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1993).Google Scholar
Hudec, R.H., ‘GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: A Requiem for an “Aim and Effects” Test’ (1998) 32 International Lawyer 619–49.Google Scholar
Hudec, R.H., ‘Science and Post-Discriminatory WTO Law’ (2003) 26 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 185–96.Google Scholar
Iacovides, M., ‘Marginal Consumers, Marginalised Economics: Whose Tastes and Habits Should the WTO Panels and Appellate Body Consider When Assessing “Likeness”?’ (2014) 48 Journal of World Trade 323–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, S., Katayama, H. and Krishna, K., ‘Is Protection really for Sale? A Survey and Directions for Future Research’ (2009) 18 Review of International Economics and Finance 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J.H., ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’ (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law 60–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J.H., ‘International Law Status of WTO DS Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to ‘Buy-Out’?’ 98 American Journal of International Law (2004) 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, L.A. and Anderson, K., ‘What’s behind the GM Food Trade Disputes’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffee, S. and Henson, S., ‘Standards and Agro-Food Exports from Developing Countries: Rebalancing the Debate’ (2004) World Bank Policy Research Paper 3348, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
James, S. and Anderson, K., ‘On the Need for More Economic Assessment of Quarantine/SPS Policies’ (1998) 42 Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 525–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H.G., ‘Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation’ (1953–1954) 21 The Review of Economic Studies 142–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D.M., Slovic, P., Braman, D. and Gastil, J., ‘Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk’ (2006) 19 Harvard Law Review 1071–109.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Klein, G., ‘Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree’ (2009) 64 American Psychologist 515–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H., ‘Experimental Test of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ (1990) 98 Journal of Political Economy 1325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., ‘Subjective Probability: A Judgement of Representativeness’ (1972) 3 Cognitive Psychology 430–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., ‘On the Psychology of Prediction’ (1973) 80 Psychological Review 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’ (1979) 47 Econometrica 263–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N., ‘Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility’ (1939) 49 Economic Journal 549–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karacaovali, B. and Limão, N., ‘The Clash of Liberalization: Preferential vs. Multilateral Trade Liberalization in the European Union’ (2008) 74 Journal of International Economics 299–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, R.E. and Kasperson, J.X., ‘The Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk’ (1996) 545 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, R.E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H.S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Ksperson, J.X. and Ratick, S., ‘The Social Amplification of Risk’ (1988) 8 Risk Analysis 177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives (New York, Wiley, 1976).Google Scholar
Kenkel, D., ‘Cost of Illness Approach’, in: Tolley, G., Kenkel, D. and Fabian, R. (eds) Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1994) 42–71.Google Scholar
Kenkel, D., Berger, M. and Blomquist, G., ‘Contingent Valuation of Health’, in: Tolley, G., Kenkel, D. and Fabian, R. (eds) Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1994) 73–104.Google Scholar
Kinsey, J., ‘GATT and the Economics of Food Safety’ (1993) 18 Food Policy 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M. and Mukerji, S., ‘A Smooth Model of Decision-Making under Ambiguity’ (2005) 73 Econometrica 1849–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klick, J. and Mitchell, G., ‘Government Regulation of Irrationality: Moral and Cognitive Hazards’ (2005–2006) Minnesota Law Review 1620–63.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A., Foundations of the Theory of Probability (New York, Chelsea Publishing, 1956).Google Scholar
Kolsky Lewis, M. and Frankel, S. (eds), International Economic Law and National Autonomy (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kone, D. and Mullet, E., ‘Societal Risk Perception and Media Coverage’ (1994) 14 Risk Analysis 21–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krugman, P., ‘Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade’ (1979) 9 Journal of International Economics 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P., ‘What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?’ 35 Journal of Economic Literature (1997) 113.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 3rd, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T. and Sunstein, C., ‘Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation’ (1999) 51 Stanford Law Review 683–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A.T.F., ‘Provisional Measures under Article 5.7 of the WTO’s Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Some Criticisms of the Jurisprudence So Far’ (2008) 42 Journal of World Trade 1085–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limão, N., ‘Preferential Trading Blocks as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade: Evidence for the U.S.’ (2006) 96 American Economic Review 896–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J.A., ‘Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace’ (2004) 72 Econometrica 615–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G. and Sugden, R., ‘Regret Theory: An Alternative Approach to Rational Choice under Uncertainty’ (1982) 92 Economic Journal 805–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions: Critical Introduction and Survey (New York, Wiley, 1957).Google Scholar
Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions: Critical Introduction and Survey (New York, Dover Publications, 2nd Ed., 1989).Google Scholar
Ludema, R.D. and Mayda, A.M., ‘Do Terms-of-Trade Effects Matter for Trade Agreements? Theory and Evidence from WTO Countries’ (2013) 128 Quarterly Journal of Economics 1837–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrady, B., Trade and Public Health: The WTO, Tobacco, Alcohol and Diet (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, J.O. and Movesian, ML., ‘The World Trade Constitution’ (2000) 114 Harvard Law Review 511–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G. and Rodriguez-Clare, A., ‘The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressure’ (1998) 106 Journal of Political Economy 574–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G. and Staiger, R., ‘The Role of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Trade Agreements’ (2011) 126 Quarterly Journal of Economics 475–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, G. and Trachtman, J.P., ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 811–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Subramanian, A., ‘Regulatory Autonomy and Multilateral Disciplines’ (1998) 1 Journal of International Economic Law 303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, P.C., Trade in Goods: The GATT and Other WTO Agreements Regulating Trade in Goods (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P.C., ‘Driftin’ too Far from Shore – Why the Test for Compliance with the TBT Agreement Developed by the WTO Appellate Body Is Wrong, and What Should the AB Have Done Instead’ (2013) 12 World Trade Review 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavriodis, P.C. and Saggi, K., ‘What Is Not So Cool about US – COOL Regulations? A Critical Analysis of the Appellate Body’s Ruling on US – COOL’ (2014) 13 World Trade Review 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, P.E., Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of Evidence (Lanham, Jason Aronson, 1996).Google Scholar
Melischek, C.A., The Relevant Market in International Economic Law: A Comparative Antitrust and GATT Analysis (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Melitz, M.J., ‘The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocation and Aggregate Industry Productivity’ (2003) 71 Econometrica 1691–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercurio, B. and Shao, D., ‘A Precautionary Approach to Decision Making: The Evolution of the Jurisprudence on Article 5.7 of the SPS Agreement’ (2010) 2 Trade Law & Development 195–223.Google Scholar
Milnor, J.W., ‘Games against Nature’, in: Coombs, C.H., Davis, R.L. and Thrall, R. MacDowell (eds) Decision Processes (New York, Wiley, 1954) 49–60.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P., ‘Probability’, in: Davis, J.B., Hands, D.W. and Mäki, U. (eds) Handbook of Economic Methodology (Cheltenham, Edward Elger, 1998) 391–3.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. and Carson, R., Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Neuman, J. and Turk, E., ‘Necessity Revisited Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea – Beef, EC – Asbestos and EC – Sardines’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 199–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neven, D. and Weiler, J.H.H., ‘Japan-Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples: One Bad Apple’, in: Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P.C. (eds) The WTO Case Law of 2003 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006) 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oesch, M., ‘Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law 635–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiro, D.A., ‘GATT/WTO Necessity Analysis: Evolutionary Interpretation and Its Impact on the Autonomy of Domestic Regulation’ (2002) 29 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossa, R., ‘A New “Trade Theory” of GATT/WTO’ (2011) 119 Journal of Political Economy 122–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. and Sewadeh, M., ‘Saving Two in a Billion: Quantifying the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards on African Exports’ (2001) 26 Food Policy 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partito, E., ‘The Appellate Body Report in US-Tuna II and Its Impact on Eco-Labelling and Standardization’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., ‘A GMO by Any Other Name… Might Be an SPS Risk!: Implications of Expanding the Scope of the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement’ (2007) 17 European Journal of International Law 1009–31.Google Scholar
Peel, J., Science and Risk Regulation in International Law (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J., ‘On Apples and Oranges (and Hormones in Beef): Science and the Standard of Review in WTO Disputes under the SPS Agreement’ (2012) 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 427–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, S., ‘Toward a More General Theory of Regulation’ (1976) 19 Journal of Law & Economics 211–40.Google Scholar
Peterson, M., An Introduction to Decision Theory (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K.R., ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’ (1959) 10 British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porges, A. and Trachtman, J., ‘Robert Hudec and Domestic Regulation: The Resurrection of Aim and Effects’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 783–99.Google Scholar
Powell, M.R., ‘How to Modell a Negligible Probability under the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement?’ (2012) 32 Risk Analysis 1–12.Google Scholar
Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, ‘Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management’ (1997).Google Scholar
Prévost, D., ‘Opening Pandora’s Box: The Panel’s Findings in the EC-Biotech Trade Dispute’ (2007) 34 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachlinski, J.J. and Farina, C.R., ‘Cognitive Psychology and Optimal Governmental Design’ (2002) 87 Cornell Law Review 549–615.Google Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘Judicial Review of Member-State Regulation of Trade within a Federal or Quasi-federal System: Protectionism and Balancing, Da Capo’ (2001) 99 Michigan Law Review 1853–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘Regulatory Purpose and “Like Products” in Article III:4 of the GATT (with additional Remarks on Article III:2)’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘Further Thoughts on the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III of the GATT’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 737–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘What Are Trade Agreements for? Two Conflicting Stories Told by Economists with a Lesson for Lawyers’ 9 Journal of International Economic Law (2006) 951–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘The Meaning of ‘Necessary’ in GATT Article XX and GATS Article XVI: The Myth of Cost-Benefit Balancing’ (2007) 6 World Trade Review 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘United States – Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry from China: The Fascinating Case that wasn’t’ (2012) 11 World Trade Review 273–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, D.H., ‘Explaining Trade Agreements: The Practitioner’s Story and the Standard Model’ (2014) EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2014/113.Google Scholar
Renn, O., ‘Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk’, in: Kasperson, R.E. and Stallen, P.J.M. (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives (Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1991) chapter 19.Google Scholar
Rigod, B., ‘The Purpose of the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)’ (2013) 24 European Journal of International Law 503–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, F., ‘Beyond the Ostensible: A Tribute to Professor Robert Hudec’s Insights on the Determination of Likeness of Products under the National Treatment Provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade 771–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.G., ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’ (1982) 36 International Organization 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P., ‘A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumers’ Behaviour’ (1938) 5 Economica 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T.C., Choice and Consequence (Cambridge/Mass., Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Schkade, D. and Payne, J., ‘How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation’ (1994) 26 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 88–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoemaker, P.J.H., ‘The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations’ (1982) 20 Journal of Economic Literature 529–63.Google Scholar
Schropp, S.A.B., ‘Commentary on the Appellate Body Report in Australia – Apples (DS367): Judicial Review in the Face of Uncertainty’ (2012) 11 World Trade Review 171–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J., ‘On Kith and Kane (and Crustaceans): Trade and Environment in the EU and the WTO’, in: Weiler, J.H.H. (ed.) The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? (New York, Oxford University Press, 2000) 125–67.Google Scholar
Scott, J., The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Shafir, E. and LeBoeuf, R.A., ‘Rationality’ (2002) 53 Annual Review of Psychology 491–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silveira, L.D.O., and Oberstein, T., ‘The Scope of the TBT Agreement in Light of Recent WTO Case Law’ (2013) 8 Global Trade and Customs Journal 112–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H.A., ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’ (1955) 69 Quarterly Journal of Economics 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S., ‘Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgement’ (1971) 6 Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance 649–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S., ‘Rating the Risk’ (1979) 21 Environment 14–39.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, T.N., ‘Non-discrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin with and Is There Anything Left?’ 4 World Trade Review (2006) 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, R., ‘Non-Tariff Measures and the WTO’ (2011) Background Paper to the WTO World Trade Report 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, R. and Sykes, A.O., ‘International Trade, National Treatment and Domestic Regulation’ (2011) 40 Journal of Legal Studies 149–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. and West, R.F., ‘Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?’ (2000) 23 Behavioral and Brain Science 645–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stigler, G.J., ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’ (1971) 2 Bell Journal of Economics and Management 3–21.Google Scholar
Stirling, A., ‘On Precautionary and Science Based Approaches to Risk Assessment and Environmental Appraisal’, in: Stirling, A. (ed.) On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk (Sevilla, European Science Technology Observer, 2001) 36–93.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C., ‘The Real World of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Thirty-Six Questions (and almost as many Answers)’ (2014) 114 Columbia Law Review 167–211.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., Valuing Life – Humanizing the Regulatory State (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Sykes, A.O., ‘Regulatory Protectionism and the Law of International Trade’ (1999) 66 University of Chicago Law Review 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A.O., ‘The (Limited) Role of Regulatory Harmonization in International Goods and Services Markets’ (1999) 2 Journal of International Economic Law 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A.O., ‘Domestic Regulation, Sovereignty and Scientific Evidence Requirements: A Pessimistic View’ 3 Chicago Journal of International Law (2002) 353–68.Google Scholar
Sykes, A.O., ‘The Least Restrictive Means’ (2003) 70 University of Chicago Law Review 403–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taleb, N.N., Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder (New York, Random House, 2012)Google Scholar
Thomson, A.P., ‘Australia – Salmon and Compliance Issues Surrounding the SPS Agreement: Sovereign Acceptance and Measure Adaptation’ (2001–2002) 33 Law & Policy in International Business 717–40.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J.P., ‘Trade and … Problems, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity’ 9 European Journal of International Law (1998) 32–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, G., ‘The General Irrelevance of the General Impossibility Theorem’ (1967) 81 Quarterly Journal of Economics 256–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumlir, J., Protectionism: Trade Policy in Democratic Societies (Washington D.C., American Enterprise Institute, 1985).Google Scholar
Tversky, A., ‘Intransitivity of Preferences’ (1969) 76 Psychological Review 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability’ (1973) 4 Cognitive Psychology 207–32.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ (1974) 185 Science 1124–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’ (1981) 211 Science 453–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Causal Schemes in Judgements under Uncertainty’, in: Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds) Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982) 117–28.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model’ (1991) 107 Quarterly Journal of Economics 1039–61.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’ (1992) 5 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN Conference on Environment and Development, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’ (1992) 37 International Legal Materials 874–80.Google Scholar
Venables, A., ‘Trade and Trade Policy with Differentiated Products: A Chamberlinian-Ricardian Model’ (1987) 97 Economic Journal 700–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoosel, G., National Treatment and WTO Dispute Settlement – Adjudicating the Boundaries of Regulatory Autonomy (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar
Villegas, C., ‘On Qualitative Probability’ (1967) 74 American Mathematical Monthly 661–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W.K., ‘Regulation of Health, Safety and Environmental Risks’, in: Polinsky, A.M. and Shavell, S. (eds) Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 1 (Amsterdam, North Holland Publishing, 2007) 591–641.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W.K., ‘How to Value a Life’ (2008) 32 Journal of Economic Finance 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W.K. and Aldy, J.E., ‘The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World’ (2003) 27 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D., The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
von Moltke, K., ‘The Vorsorgeprinzip in West German Environmental Law’ (1988) 12th Report Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, UK, HMSO, CM 310.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1944).Google Scholar
Vranes, E., Trade and the Environment (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahlberg, A.A.F. and Sjöberg, L., ‘Risk Perception and the Media’ (2000) 3 Journal of Risk Research 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, A., ‘Statistical Decision Functions Which Minimize the Maximum Risk’ (1945) 46 Annals of Mathematics 265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, V.R., ‘The Siren Song of Science: Toward a Taxonomy of Scientific Uncertainty for Decisionmakers’ (1991) 23 Connecticut Law Review 667–726.Google Scholar
Walker, V.R., ‘Consistent Levels of Protection in International Trade Disputes: Using Risk Perception Research to Justify Different Levels of Acceptable Risk’ (2001) 31 Environmental Law Reporter 11317–25.Google Scholar
Wakker, P.P., Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherford, R., Philosophical Foundations of Probabilistic Theories (London, Routledge, 1982).Google Scholar
Weiler, J.H.H., ‘Comment on Brazil – Measures Affecting the Imports of Retreaded Tyres (DS322)’ (2009) 8 World Trade Review 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J.B., ‘Whose Precaution after All? A Comment on the Comparison and Evolution of Risk Regulatory Systems’ (2003) 13 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 207–62.Google Scholar
Whitlock, J.P., ‘Japan – Measures Affecting Agricultural Products: Lessons for Future SPS and Agricultural Trade Disputes’ (2001–2002) 33 Law & Policy of International Business 741–76.Google Scholar
Winickoff, D., Jasanoff, S., Busch, L., Grove-White, R. and Wynne, B., ‘Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk and Democracy in World Trade Law’ (2005) 30 Yale Journal of International Law 81–123.Google Scholar
WTO Secretariat, Economic Research and Statistics Division, 2005 World Trade Report, Exploring the Links between Trade, Standards and the WTO (2005).Google Scholar
WTO Secretariat, SPS Committee, ‘Guidelines to Further the Practical Implementation Article 5.5’, G/SPS/15 of 18 July 2000.Google Scholar
Zhou, W., ‘The Role of Regulatory Purpose under Articles III:2 and III:4 – Toward Consistency between Negotiating History and WTO Jurisprudence’ (2012) 11 World Trade Review 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W., ‘US – Clove Cigarettes and US – Tuna II (Mexico): Implications for the Role of Regulatory Purpose under Article III:4 of the GATT’ (2012) 15 Journal of International Economic Law 1075–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar