Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:56:02.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix I - Appendix of Legal Principles

from APPENDIX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

John Patrick O'Grady ,
Martin L. Gimovsky ,
Lucy A. Bayer-Zwirello  and
Kevin Giordano
John Patrick O'Grady
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Operative Obstetrics , pp. 843 - 873
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Miller v. Albany Medical Center Hosp., 95 A. D.2d 977 (1983).
Findlay v. Board of Supervisors 230 P2d 526 (1951).
Childs v. Weiss 440 S. W.2d at 106, 107.
Ibid. at 106–107.
Ibid. at 106.
Sullenger v. Setco Northwest, 702 P.2d 1139 (Or.Ct.App.1985).
Oliver v. Brock, 342 So.2d 1 (Ala.1977).
342 So.2d at 4.
Hill by Burston v. Kokosky, 463 N. W.2d 265 (1990), ibid. at 268.
Dunn, JD, Practice with co-providers. In Legal Medicine: Legal Dynamics of Medical Encounters ed 2. St. Louis, Mosby, 199l; pp 434, 438.Google Scholar
Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Memorial Hospital, 866 S. W.2d 32 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993).
See ibid. at 39–40; Cintron v. New York Medical College Flower and Fifth Ave. Hosps., 193 A. D.2d 551 (1st Dept 1993).
Hill by Burston, supra at 267.
Gilinsky v. Indelicato, D. C., 894 F.Supp. 86 (1995).
McCullough v. Hutzel Hosp., 88 Mich. App. 235 (1979).
Maxwell v. Cole, 482 N. Y. S.2d 1000 (Sup. Ct. 1984).
Moeller v. Hauser, 54 N. W.2d 639 (1952).
McCullough v. Hutzel Hosp., 276 N. W.2d 569 (1979).
Ibid. at 571.
Mozingo v. Pitt Cty. Mem. Hosp., 415 S. E.2d 341 (1992).
Silva v. Providence Hosp., 97 P.2d 798, 804 (Cal. 1939).
Hurley v. Eddingfield, 59 N. E. 1058, 1058 (Ind. 1901).
Prosser, WL, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 56, ed 4. West Publishing Co., 1971: pp. 341–342.Google Scholar
Malloy, supra, 232 P.2d at 247; cf. United States v. DeVane, 306 F.2d 182, 186 (5th Cir. 1962).
Frank, B. Mapel III & Charles, J. Weigel II, Good Samaritan laws – who needs them? The current state of Good Samaritan protection in the United States, 21 S. Tex. L. Rev. 327, 330 (1981).Google Scholar
Colby v. Schwartz, 78 Cal App.3d 885 (Cal Ct. App. 1978).
Velazquez v. Jiminez 169 N. J. 604 (2001).
Restatement (Second) of Torts, Division Two, Ch. 12, Topic 4, Scope Note, at 65–66 (1965).
Dawson v. Bunker Hill Plaza Assocs., 289 N. J. Super. 309, 327 (App. Div. 1996).
O'Neill v. Suburban Terrace Apartments, Inc., 110 N. J. Super. 541, 545 (App. Div. 1970).
Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hosp. Ass'n, 349 A.2d. 245 (Md. 1975).
Lenger v. Physican's Gen. Hosp., 455 S. W.2d 703, 707 (Tex. 1970).
Hicks v. United States 368 F.2d 626 (4th Circ. 1996).
Krishnan v. Ramirez, 42 S. W.3d 212 (Tex. App. 2001).
Connellan v. Coffey, 187 A.2d 901 (1936).
Gooding v. University Hospital Building, Inc., supra.
Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc., supra.
Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital 863 S. W.852 (1993).
Prosser, WL, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 43, ed 4. West Publishing Co., 1971; p. 291.Google Scholar
``Proving Causation in “Loss of a Chance” Cases: A Proportional Approach,” 34 Cath. U. L. Rev. 747 (1985).
Ibid. at 749.
Herkovits v. Group Health Co-Op, 664 P.2d 474 (1983).
Recovery for Loss of Chance in a Wrongful Death Action – Herkovits v. Group Health, 99 Wash. 2d 609, 664 P.2d 474 (1983), 59 Wash. L. Rev. 981 (1984).
Delaney v. Cade, supra, 255 Kan. 211–12.
Brown v. Koulizakis, 331 S. E.2d 440 (1985).
McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., 741 P.2d 467 (Okla. 1987).
Zilich, GJ, Cutting through the confusion of the loss-of-chance doctrine under Ohio law: A new cause of action or a new standard of causation?50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 673 (2002–2003).Google Scholar
J. King, 90 Yale L. J., supra, p. 1354.
34 Cath. U. L. Rev., supra, pp. 766–67.
Kirby v. Spivey, 307 S. E.2d 538 (1983)
LaBieniec v. Baker, 526 A.2d 1341 (1987).
Deutsch v. Shein, 597 S. W.2d 141 (Ky. 1980; adopting the substantial factor test of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 431).
Pathways, Inc. v. Hammons, 113 S. W.3d 85 (Ky. 2003).
Bailey v. North American Refractories Co., 95 S. W.3d 868 (Ky. App. 2001).
Restatement (Second) of Torts § 431.
Walden v. Jones, 439 S. W.2d 571 (Ky. 1968).
61 Am. Jur. 2d Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Healers § 332 (2002).
Miller v. Paulson, 646 N. E.2d 521 (1994).
Dalebout v. Union Pac. R. R. Co., 980 P.2d 1194 (Utah Ct. App. 1999).
Fid. & Guaranty Ins. Underwriters, Inc. v. Gary Douglas Elec., Inc., 357 N. E.2d 388 (1974).
Nichols SM, Jorgenson v. Vener: The South Dakota Supreme Court declares loss-of-chance doctrine as part of our common law in medical malpractice torts, 46 S. D. L. Rev. 618 (2000–2001).
Dingle v. Belin, 749 A.2d 157 (2000).
Rizzo v. Schiller, 445 S. E.2d 153, 155 (1994).
Moates v. Hyslop, 480 S. E.2d 109, 111 (1997).
Rizzo v. Schiller, 445 S. E.2d 153,154 (1994).
Bly v. Rhoads, 216 Va. 645, 650–51, 222 S. E.2d 783, 787 (1976).
Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F.2d 772 (1972).
Ibid. at 787.
Precourt v. Frederick, 481 N. E.2d 1144, 1149 (Mass. 1985) (quoting LaCaze v. Collier, 434 So.2d 1039, 1046 (La. 1983)).
Ibid. at 243 (quoting Wilkinson v. Vesey, 295 A.2d 676 (R. I. 1972)).
Harrison v. United States 284 F.3d 293 (2003).
Banaghan v. Dewey, 340 Mass. 73, 79 (1959).
Dodge v. Sawyer, 288 Mass. 402 (1934).
Nass v. Duxbury, 327 Mass. 396 (1951).
Phillips v. Deihm, 541 NW2d 566 (1995).
United States v. Alzanki, 54 F.3d 994, 1005 (1st Cir. 1995).
United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1183 (1st Cir. 1993).
Mitchell v. United States, 141 F.3d 8, 15 (1st Cir. 1998).
Payton v. Abbott Labs, 780 F.2d 147, 155 (1st Cir. 1985).
Sheely v. Memorial Hospital 710 A.2d 161 (1998)
Lake v. Clark, 450 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1983).
Lake v. Clark, 533 So.2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA), review.
Fed. R. Evid. 702.
Ariz.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Ark.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Colo.R.Evid. 803(18) (1992).
Del.Unif.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Hawaii R.Evid. 803(b)(18) (1991).
Idaho R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Iowa R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Kan.Stat.Ann. § 60–460(cc) (1991).
Ky.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 422A.0803(18) (1991).
La.Code Evid.Ann. art. 803(18) (1991).
Me.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Minn.R.Evid. 803(18) (1992).
Mont.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Nev. Rev.Stat.Ann. § 51.255 (Michie 1991).
N. H. R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
N. M. R.Evid. 11–803 R (1991).
N. C.Gen.Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 803(18) (1991).
Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12, § 2803(18) (West 1991).
S. D.Codified Laws Ann. § 19-16-22 (1991).
Tex.R.Civ.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Utah R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Vt.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Wash.R.Evid. 803(a)(18) (1991).
W.Va.R.Evid. 803(18) (1991).
Wis.Stat.Ann. § 908.03(18) (West 1991).
Cross v. Huttenlocher, 185 Conn. 390, 440 A.2d 952, 955–56 (1981).
Fed. R.Evid. 803(18).
Swank v. Halivopoulos, 260 A.2d 240 (App. Div. 1969).
Gridley v. Johnson, 476 S. W.2d 475 (Mo. 1972).
Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hosp., 211 N. E.2d 253, 259 (Ill. 1966).
Jacober by Jacober v. St. Peter's Med. Ctr., 608 A.2d 304 (1992).
Darling v. Charleston County Mem'l Hospital 211 N. E.2d 253 (Ill. 1965)
Jones v. Bloom, 388 Mich. 98, 200 N. W. 2d 196 (1972).
Iverson v. Lancaster, 158 N. W.2d 507, 517–18 (N. D. 1968).
Dabroe v. Rhodes Co., 392 P.2d 317, 321–23 (1964).
Thornton v. CAMC, 305 S. E.2d 316, 321–23 (W.Va. 1983).
FRE 803 (18).
Schneider v. Revici, 817 F.2d 987 (2d Cir.1987).
Tart v. McGann, 697 F.2d 75, 78 (2nd Cir.1982).
Hemingway v. Ochsner Clinic, 608 F.2d 1040, 1047 (5th Cir.1979).
Meschino v. North Am. Drager, Inc., 841 F.2d 429, 434 (1st Cir. 1988).
Kilpatrick v. Wolfond, 704 So. 2d 708 (1998).
Strickler J. EMTALA: The basics. JONAS Health Law Ethics Regul. 2006 Jul–Sept; 8(3):77–81.
42 U. S. C. § 1395dd(a).
Vickers v. Nash Gen. Hosp., Inc., 78 F.3d 139, 142 (4th Cir. 1996).
Baber v. Hospital Corp. of America, 977 F.2d 8721, 880 (4th Cir. 1992).
42 U. S. C. § 1395dd(a), (e) (3) (B).
C. M. v. Tomball Reg'l Hosp., 961 S. W.2d 236, 240 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1997).
Repp v. Anadarko Mun. Hosp. 43 F.3d 529 (10th Cir. 1994)
Marshall v. East Carroll Parish Hospital, 134 F.3d 319,322 (5th Cir. 1998).
United States v. Rush Foundation Hospital: U. S. Dept. Health Hum. Services: No. CR 832 (2001).
Jackson v. East Bay Hosp., 246 F.3d 1248 (9th Cir).
Eberhardt v. City of Los Angeles, 62 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1995).
Urban v. King, 43 F.3d 523 (1994).
Burditt v. United States, 934 F.2d 1362 (1991).
Frye v. United States 293 F. 1013 (D. C. Cir. 1923).
Roe v. Wade 410 U. S. 113 (1973).
Planned Parenthood v. Casey 505 U. S. 833 (1992).
Maher v. Roe 432 U. S. 464 (1977).
Harris v. McRae 448 U. S. 297 (1980).
Stenberg v. Carhart 530 U. S. 914 (2000).
Griswold v. Connecticut 381U. S. 479
Greco v. U. S. 893. P2d 345 (1995).
Becker v. Schwartz 46 NY 2d 401 (1978).
Reed v. Compagnolo 332 Md. 226 (1993).
Siemieniec v. Lutheran General Hospital 117 Ill. 2d 230 (1987).
Gallagher v. Duke University Hospital 638 F.Supp 979 (M. D. N. C. 1986).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×