Abbott, Frederick M. (2021). Child-Proofing Global Public Health in Anticipation of Emergency. www.ila-americanbranch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/White-Paper-COVID19-Global-Governance-FINAL-April-2021.pdf.Google Scholar

Abraham, Kavi J. (2017). ‘Politics Lost?’ in Combes, DeRaismes ed., Can Networks Govern? An International Studies Quarterly Online Symposium, 6 October, 7–8 at www.dhnexon.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ISQSymposiumAvant.pdf.Google Scholar

Abraham, Kavi J. and Abramson, Yoni (2015). A Pragmatist Vocation for International Relations: The (Global) Public and Its Problems. European Journal of International Relations, 23 (1), 26–48.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization, 58 (2), 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2011). Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 39 (3), 619–37.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2013). Rethinking Power, Institutions and Ideas in World Politics Whose IR? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58 (4), 647–59.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav (2016). Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2007). Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7 (3), 287–312.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2019). The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at Its Centenary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (2021). Re-imagining International Relations: World Orders in the Thought and Practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic Civilizations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerly, Brooke A. and True, Jacqui (2008). An Intersectional Analysis of International Relations. Politics and Gender, 4 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Addams, Jane (1902). Democracy and Social Ethics, New York: Macmillan. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Addams, Jane (2002 [1895]). ‘The Settlement as a Factor in the Labor Movement’ in Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed., The Jane Addams Reader, New York: Basic Books. Kindle Edition. [First published in 1895 in Hull House Maps and Papers, New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.]Google Scholar

Addams, Jane (2002 [1909]). ‘The Thirst for Righteousness’ in Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed., The Jane Addams Reader, New York: Basic Books. Kindle Edition. [First published in 1909 in The Spirit of Youth and City Streets, New York, Macmillan.]Google Scholar

Addams, Jane (2019 [1922]). Peace and Bread in Time of War: Activists on the Way to a 1915 Peace Conference, Washington DC: Ebooks for Students Ltd. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Adediran, Bolarinwa (2018). Reforming the Security Council through a Code of Conduct: A Sisyphean Task? Ethics & International Affairs, 32 (4), 463–82.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel (1992). The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control. International Organization, 46 (1), 101–46.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel (2005). Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post – Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14 (2), 195–230.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (1998). ‘Security Communities in Theoretical Perspective’ in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael eds., Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–28.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Bernstein, Steven (2005). ‘Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance’ in Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond eds., Power in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294–318.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Drieschova, Alena (2021). The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order. International Organization, 75 (2), 359–86.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Faubert, Michael (2022). ‘Epistemic Communities of Practice’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 47–76.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Haas, Peter (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order and the creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization, 46 (1), 367–90.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (2011). ‘International practices: introduction and framework’ in Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–35.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2008). The Diplomacy of Opting Out: A Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46 (3), 663–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Pouliot, Vincent (2014). Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20 (4), 889–911.Google Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey C. (2011). Performance and Power, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Alexander, Thomas M. (1993). John Dewey and the Moral Imagination: Beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a Postmodern Ethics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 29 (3), 369–400.Google Scholar

Allan, Barry (2021). ‘Pragmatism and Confucian Empiricism’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D., eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 59–69.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. (2020). The WHO in the Age of the Coronavirus. American Journal of International Law, 114 (4), 578–87.Google Scholar

Ames, Roger T. (2021). ‘On the Cusp of a New World Order? A Dialogue between Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 176–205.Google Scholar

Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Peter, D. Hershock (2021). ‘Introduction’ in Roger T. Ames, Chen Yajun and Peter D. Hershock, eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 11–24.Google Scholar

Annan, Kofi (1999). Secretary-General Presents his Annual Report to General Assembly, 20 September at https://press.un.org/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.htmlGoogle Scholar

Ansell, Christopher (2011). Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Auteserre, Séverine (2014). Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah (2016). Pragmatic Networks and Transnational Governance of Private Military and Security Services. International Studies Quarterly, 60 (2), 330–42.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah (2017). ‘A Pragmatic Response’ in Combes, DeRaismes ed., Can Networks Govern? An International Studies Quarterly Online Symposium, 6 October, 13–15 at www.dhnexon.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ISQSymposiumAvant.pdf.Google Scholar

Avant, Deborah (2021). ‘Mainstream Allergy to Pragmatism’s Femininities’ in Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The prospects of substantive theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1940–2.Google Scholar

Bäckstrand, Karin and Kuyper, Jonathan W. (2017). The Democratic Legitimacy of Orchestration: The UNFCCC, Non-state Actors, and Transnational Climate Governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 764–88.Google Scholar

Baier, Annette (1991). A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bardosh, Kevin L. et al. (2020). Integrating the Social Sciences in Epidemic Preparedness and Response: A Strategic Framework to Strengthen Capacities and Improve Global Health Security. Globalization and Health, 16, 1–18.Google Scholar

Bargués, Pol (2020). Peacebuilding Without Peace? On How Pragmatism Complicates the Practice of International Intervention. Review of International Studies, 46 (2), 237–55.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel (2010). Realist Constructivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barkin, J. Samuel and Sjoberg, Laura (2019). International Relations’ Last Synthesis? Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Amy and Wallace Brown, Garrett (2011). ‘The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: Expertise, Accountability and the Depoliticisation of Global Health Governance’ in Williams, Owain and Rushton, Simon eds., Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 53–75.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Adler, Emanuel (1998). ‘Studying Security Communities in Theory, Comparison and History’ in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael eds., Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 413–41.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael and Weiss, Thomas G. (2011). Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bauer, Harry and Brighi, Elisabetta, eds., (2009). Pragmatism in International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Beardsworth, Richard (2020). Climate Science, the Politics of Climate Change and Futures of IR. International Relations, 34 (3), 374–90.Google Scholar

Beck, Silke and Forsyth, Tim (2017). ‘Environmental Science and International Relations’ in Corry, Olaf and Stevenson, Hayley eds., Traditions and Trends in Global Environmental Politics: International Relations and the Earth, New York: Routledge, 81–99.Google Scholar

Beck, Silke and Mahony, Martin (2018). The IPCC and the New Map of Science and Politics. WIREs Climate Change, 3 July at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/wcc.547.Google Scholar

Behera, Navnita Chadha (2016). Knowledge Production. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 153–5.Google Scholar

Behuniak, Jim (2021). ‘Toward a Social Philosophy Dewey’s Newly Restored China Lectures’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 128–43.Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan (2018). Pragmatism and Prophecy: H. G. Wells and the Metaphysics of Socialism. The American Political Science Review, 112 (2), 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. (2002). Pragmatic Solidarism and Dilemmas of Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 683–719.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex J. and Luck, Edward (2018). The Responsibility to Protect: From Promise to Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Alex. J. and Šimonović, Ivan (2021). Introduction: Towards Evidence Based Atrocity Prevention. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 24 (3–4), 285–304.Google Scholar

Bellamy, Rob, Chilvers, Jason, and Vaughan, Naomi (2016). Deliberative Mapping of Options for Tackling Climate Change: Citizens and Specialists ‘Open Up’ Appraisal of Geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science, 25 (3), 269–86.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla (1986). Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Berling, Trine Villumsen (2012). Bourdieu, International Relations, and European Security. Theory and Society, 41 (5), 451–78.Google Scholar

Berling, Trine Villumsen (2015). The International Political Sociology of Security: Rethinking Theory and Practice, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J. (2013). ‘Hegel and Pragmatism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 105–23.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J. (2021). ‘John Dewey: Exemplar of the Democratic Public Intellectual’ in Ames, Roger T., Yajun, Chen and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 26–40.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Steven and Laurence, Marion (2022). ‘Practices and Norms: Relationships, Disjunctures and Change’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 77–99.Google Scholar

Biesta, Gert (2006). ‘“Of All Affairs, Communication Is the Most Wonderful”. The Communicative Turn in Dewey’s Democracy and Education’ in Hansen, David T. ed., John Dewey and Our Educational Prospect. A Critical Engagement with Dewey’s Democracy and Education, New York: State University of New York Press, 23–37.Google Scholar

Bigo, Didier (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27 (1), 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigo, Didier (2013). ‘Security: Analyzing Transnational Professionals of (in)Security in Europe’ in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ed., Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, London: Routledge, 114–30.Google Scholar

Bigo, Didier (2016). ‘International Political Sociology’ in Bossong, Raphael and Rhinard, Mark eds., Theorising Internal Security in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64–81.Google Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar (2008). Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29 (1), 5–23.Google Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar (2016). Contrapuntal Reading as a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 134–46.Google Scholar

Biswas, Shampa (2001). ‘Nuclear Apartheid’ as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Discourse. Alternatives, 26 (4), 485–522.Google Scholar

Blanchard, Eric M. (2020). Combing the Same Beach: Analytic Eclecticism and the Challenge of Theoretical Multilingualism. International Journal, 75 (3), 404–19.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Alan (2016). Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change. Review of International Studies, 42 (2), 310–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, Alexandra and Wallace Brown, Garrett (2020). R2P and Prevention: the International Community and Its Role in the Determinants of Mass Atrocity. Global Responsibility to Protect 13 (1), 60–95.Google Scholar

Bohman, James (1999). Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor. American Journal of Political Science, 43 (2), 590–607.Google Scholar

Bookman, Myra (2002). ‘Forming Competence: Habermas on Reconstructing Worlds and Context-Transcendent Reason’ in Aboulafia, Mitchell, Bookman, Myra, and Kemp, Catherine eds., Habermas and Pragmatism, London and New York: Taylor and Francis, 65–80.Google Scholar

Boot, Max (2004). Neocons. Foreign Policy, 140, 20–8.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1994). Military Intervention: Duty and Prudence, in Freedman, Lawrence ed., Military Intervention in European Conflicts (Political Quarterly Special Issue), London: Blackwell Publishers, 56–72.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1997). ‘Security and Self: Reflections of a Fallen Realist’ in Krause, Keith and Williams, Michael C. eds., Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 83–119.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1999a). ‘Three Tyrannies’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 31–70.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1999b). Nuclearism, Human Rights and Construction of Security (Part 1). The International Journal of Human Rights, 3 (2), 1–24.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (1999c). Nuclearism, Human Rights and Constructions of Security (Part 2). The International Journal of Human Rights, 3 (3), 44–61.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken ed. (2005). Critical Security Studies and World Politics, London and Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken (2007). Theory of World Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Booth, Ken and Dunne, Tim (1999). ‘Learning Beyond Frontiers’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–29.Google Scholar

Bosco David, L. (2014). Assessing the UN Security Council: A Concert Perspective. Global Governance, 20 (4), 545–61.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (2000). Pascalian Meditations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (2001). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d’ethnologie Kabyle, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bower, Adam (2020). Entrapping Gulliver: The United States and the Antipersonnel Mine Ban. Security Studies, 29 (1), 128–61.Google Scholar

Boyte, Harry C. (2007). Populism and John Dewey Convergences and Contradictions. University of Michigan Dewey Lecture, March 29 at academia.eduGoogle Scholar

Bray, Daniel (2009). Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism. A Deweyan Approach to Democracy beyond the Nation-State. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 37 (3), 683–719.Google Scholar

Bray, Daniel (2011). Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bray, Daniel (2013). Pragmatic Ethics and the Will to Believe in Cosmopolitanism. International Theory, 5 (3), 446–76.Google Scholar

Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). ‘Introduction’ in Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. eds., Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, 1–19.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris (1999). ‘Universal Human Rights: A Critique’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–27.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris (2012). The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 40 (3), 439–56.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris (2022a). ‘If Not Rome or The Hague, Where? Reflections on Sanctioning and Punishing’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 97–111.Google Scholar

Brown, Faye (2022b). Putin Ramps Up Nuclear Threat: ‘We Don’t Brag, We Will Use Them’. Metro, 27 April at https://metro.co.uk/2022/04/27/vladimir-putin-ramps-up-nuclear-threat-we-dont-brag-we-will-use-them-16546440/.Google Scholar

Brown, Garrett Wallace (2010). Safeguarding Deliberative Global Governance: The Case of The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Review of International Studies, 36 (2), 511–30.Google Scholar

Brown, Garrett Wallace (2015). Knowledge, Politics and Power in Global Health: Comment on ‘Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health’. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4, 111–13.Google Scholar

Brown, Matthew J. (2013). ‘Science, Values and Democracy in the Global Climate Change Debate’, in Ralston, Shane, ed., Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 127–58.Google Scholar

Brunkhorst, Hauke (2002). Globalising Democracy Without a State: Weak Public, Strong Public, Global Constitutionalism. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 675–90.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian (2014). Pathways to Practice: Praxiography and International Politics. European Political Science Review, 6 (3), 383–406.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian (2015). Making Things Known: Epistemic Practices, the United Nations, and the Translation of Piracy. International Political Sociology, 9 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian (2018). Territory, Authority, Expertise: Global Governance and the Counter-Piracy Assemblage. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 614–37.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian and Edmunds, Tim (2021). Pragmatic Ordering. Informality, Experimentation and the Maritime Security Agenda. Review of International Studies, 47 (2), 171–91.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank (2014). International Practice Theory. New Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank (2015). The Play of International Practice. International Studies Quarterly 59 (3), 449–60.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry (2004). From International to World society? : English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George (2015). The Global Transformation. History, Modernity and the Making of the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Capie, David (2012). The Responsibility to Protect Norm in Southeast Asia: Framing, Resistance and the Localization Myth. The Pacific Review, 25 (1), 75–93.Google Scholar

Carr, Edward Hallett (1939). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919 to 1939, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey (2001). ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization, 55 (3), 553–88.Google Scholar

Chen, Jia (2021a). ‘Harmony in the Arts. The Sense of Communication in Confucian and Deweyan Aesthetics’ in Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 70–84.Google Scholar

Chen, Yajun (2021b). ‘The Core of Pragmatism and Its Echo in Chinese Philosophy’ in Ames, Roger T., Chen, Yajun and Hershock, Peter D. eds., Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism. Resources for a New Geopolitics of Interdependence, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 42–57.Google Scholar

Chernoff, Fred (2020). Pragmatism, Pluralism, and Eclecticism: Sil and Katzenstein’s ‘Analytic Eclecticism’ in Beyond Paradigms. International Journal, 75 (3), 392–403.Google Scholar

Chernoff, Fred, Cornut, Jérémie, and James, Patrick (2020). Analytic Eclecticism and International Relations: Promises and Pitfalls. International Journal, 75 (3), 383–91.Google Scholar

Christoff, Peter (2010). Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics, 19 (4), 637–56.Google Scholar

Claude, Jr. IL. (1971). Swords into Plowshares. The Problems and Progress of International Organization, New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations. A Pragmatic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2002a). A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy: Pragmatism from the Bottom-Up. European Journal of International Relations, 8 (4), 517–48.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2002b). Deweyan Pragmatism and Post-Positivist Social Science in IR. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 525–48.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2009). ‘Conceptualizing the Power of Transnational Agents: Pragmatism and International Public Spheres’ in Geenens, Raf and Tinnevelt, Ronald eds., Does Truth Matter? Democracy and Public Space, Dordrecht: Springer, 167–86.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2010). ‘Dewey as an International Thinker’ in Cochran, Molly ed., The Cambridge Companion to Dewey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309–36.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2012). Pragmatism and International Relations. A Story of Closure and Opening. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 4, 1–22.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2013). ‘Hedley Bull and John Dewey: Two Middle Grounders and a Pragmatic Approach to the Nuclear Dilemma’ in Navari, Cornelia ed., Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs: Arguments from the Middle Ground, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 158–81.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2017). ‘The “Newer Ideals” of Jane Addams’s Progressivism’ in Cochran, Molly and Navari, Cornelia eds., Progressivism and US Foreign Policy between the World Wars, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 143–65.Google Scholar

Cochran, Molly (2021). Whose Pragmatism? Which IR? In Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The prospects of substantive theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1943–5.Google Scholar

Coll, Alberto R. (1991). Normative Prudence as a Tradition of Statecraft. Ethics and International Affairs, 5 (1), 33–51.Google Scholar

Collins, Alan (2013). Norm Diffusion and ASEAN’s Adoption and Adaption of Global HIV/AIDS Norms. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13 (3), 369–97.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew F. and English, John (2005). ‘International Governance and the Mind of Global Governance’, in Thakur, Ramesh, Cooper, Andrew F. and English, John eds., International Commissions and the Power of Ideas, New York: United Nations University Press, 1–26.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew F. and Pouliot, Vincent (2015). How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice. Cooperation and Conflict, 5 (3), 334–50.Google Scholar

Cormier, Harvey (2012). Reconsidering Obama the Pragmatist. The New York Times, 14 October at http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com.Google Scholar

Cornut, Jérémie (2015). To Be a Diplomat Abroad: Diplomatic Practice at Embassies. Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (3), 385–401.Google Scholar

Cornut, Jérémie (2018). Diplomacy, Agency, and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3) 712–36.Google Scholar

Corry, Olaf (2019). Nature and the International: Towards a Materialist Understanding of Societal Multiplicity. Globalizations, 17 (3) 419–35.Google Scholar

Craig, Campbell (2003). Glimmer of a New Leviathan. Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau and Waltz, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Craig, Campbell (2019). Solving the Nuclear Dilemma: Is a World State Necessary? Journal of International Political Theory, 15 (3), 349–66.Google Scholar

Crossley, Nick (2013). Habit and Habitus. Body & Society, 19 (2–3), 136–61.Google Scholar

Dancy, Geoff (2016). Human Rights Pragmatism: Belief, Inquiry, and Pragmatism. European Journal of International Relations, 22 (3), 512–35.Google Scholar

Danielsson, Anna (2020). Reconceptualising the Politics of Knowledge Authority in Post/Conflict Interventions: From a Peacebuilding Field to Transnational Fields of Interventionary Objects. European Journal of International Security, 5 (1), 115–33.Google Scholar

Davies, Sara E. (2019). Containing Contagion. The Politics of Disease Outbreaks in South East Asia, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, Sara E. and Wenham, Clare (2020). Why the COVID-19 Response Needs International Relations. International Affairs, 96 (5), 1227–51.Google Scholar

Davies, Sara E., Kamradt-Scott, Adam, and Rushton, Simon (2015). Disease Diplomacy. International Norms and Global Health Security, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert, and Sabel, Charles (2014). Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44 (3), 477–86.Google Scholar

Deer, Cécile (2008). ‘Reflexivity’ in Grenfell, Michael ed., Pierre Bourdieu. Key Concepts, Durham: Acumen, 199–212.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth (2019). Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (1), 2–17.Google Scholar

Depledge, Joanna, Saldivia, Miguel and Peñasco, Cristina (2022). Glass Half Full or Glass Half Empty? The 2021 Glasgow Climate Conference. Climate Policy, 22 (2), 147–57.Google Scholar

DeShore, Naomi et al. (2020). An Evaluation of the Global Health Security Agenda Steering Group Governance Interventions. European Journal of Public Health, 30 (5), 593–4 at https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/30/Supplement_5/ckaa166.174/5913978.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel H. (2007). Bounding Power. Republican Security Theory from the Polis to the Global Village, Oxford and Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel H. (2019). Going Critical: Toward a Modified Nuclear One Worldism. Journal of International Political Theory, 15 (3), 367–85.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1927). The Public and Its Problems, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1929). The Quest for Certainty. A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1934). Intelligence and Power. New Republic, 25 April at https://newrepublic.com/article/100340/intelligence-and-power.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1962 [1934]). A Common Faith, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1965 [1908a]). ‘The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy’ in Dewey, John ed., The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1965 [1908b]). ‘Intelligence and Morals’ in Dewey, John ed., The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 46–76.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1972 [1920]). Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1897]). ‘My Pedagogic Creed’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 229–35. [First published in 1897 in School Journal LIV, 77–80.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1915]). ‘The Logic of Judgments of Practice’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 236–71. [First published in 1915 in Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12, 505–23, 533–43.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1916]). ‘Nationalizing Education’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 265–9. [First published in 1916 in Journal of Education 84, 425–8.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1922a]). ‘The Place of Habit in Conduct’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic and Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 24–49. [First published in 1922 in Human Nature and Conduct.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1922b]). ‘Valuation and Experimental Knowledge’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 272–86. [First Published in 1922 in Philosophical Review (31), 325–51.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1922c]). ‘The Good Activity’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 321–8. [First published in 1922 in Human Nature and Conduct.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1925a]). ‘The Development of American Pragmatism’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 3–13. [First published in 1925 in Studies in the History of Ideas, ed., Department of Philosophy, Columbia University.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1925b]). ‘Existence, Value and Criticism.’ From Experience and Nature in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 84–101.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1925c]). ‘Nature, Communication and Meaning.’ From Experience and Nature in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 50–66.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1927a]). ‘The Pragmatic Acquiescence’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 33–6. [First published in 1927 in New Republic 49, 186–9.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1927b]). ‘The Search for the Public’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 281–92. [First published in 1927 in The Public and Its Problems.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1928a]). ‘The Inclusive Philosophic Idea’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 308–15. [First published in 1928 in Monist 38, 161–77.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1928b]). ‘A Critique of American Civilization’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 316–22. [First published in 1928 in World Tomorrow 11, 391–5.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1932a]). ‘Moral Judgment and Knowledge’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic and Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 328–40. [From Ethics in 1932.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1932b]). ‘The Moral Self’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic and Psychology, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 341–54. [From Ethics in 1932.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1935]). ‘Renascent Liberalism’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 323–36. [From Liberalism and Social Action in 1935.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1998 [1939]). ‘Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us’ in Hickman, Larry A. and Alexander, Thomas M. eds., The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education Democracy, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 340–3. [First published in 1939 in John Dewey and the Promise of America, Progressive Education Booklet No. 14, Columbus Ohio: American Education Press, 12–17.]Google Scholar

Dewey, John (2011 [1916]). Democracy and Education, Milton Keynes: Simon and Brown.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (2015 [1938]). Experience and Education, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Docherty, Benedict, Mathieu, Xavier and Ralph, Jason (2020). R2P and the Arab Spring. Norm Localization and the US Response to the Early Syria Crisis. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12 (3), 246–70.Google Scholar

Drieschova, Alena and Bueger, Christian (2022). ‘Conceptualizing International Practices. Establishing a Research Agenda in Conversations’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 3–27.Google Scholar

Drolet, Jean-François (2011). American Neoconservatism. The Politics and Culture of a Reactionary Idealism, London: Hurst.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. (2004). Pragmatism and Democracy: In Search of Deliberative Publics. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 72–9.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. and Pickering, Jonathan (2019). The Politics of the Anthropocene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S., Bächtiger, André and Milewicz, Karolina (2011). Toward a Deliberative Global Citizens’ Assembly. Global Policy, 2 (1), 33–42.Google Scholar

Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk : Essays and Sketches, Chicago: A. C. McClurg and co.Google Scholar

Duff, H. Jonathan et al. (2021). A Global Public Health Convention for the 21st Century. The Lancet Public Health, 6 (6) e428–e433 at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33964227/.Google Scholar

Dunne, Tim and Booth, Ken (1999). ‘Learning beyond Frontiers’ in Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. eds., Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–28.Google Scholar

Duvall, Raymond and Chowdhury, Arjun (2011). ‘Practices of Theory’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–54.Google Scholar

Eaton, Lynn (2021). Covid-19: WHO Warns against “Vaccine Nationalism” or Face Further Virus Mutations. BMJ, 372 at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33526414/.Google Scholar

Eckersley, Robyn (2012). Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12 (2), 24–42.Google Scholar

Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed. (2002). The Jane Addams Reader, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Epstein, Charlotte (2013). ‘Norms. Bourdieu’s Nomos, Or the Structural Power of Norms’ in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ed., Bourdieu in International Relations. Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, London: Routledge, 165–78.Google Scholar

Ercan, Pinar Gözen (2016). Debating the Future of the Responsibility to Protect, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Erfani, Parsa et al. (2021). Intellectual Property Waiver for Covid-19 Vaccines will Advance Global Health Equity. BMJ, 374 August, online at www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1837.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni (2012). Whose Progress, Which Morals? Constructivism, Normative IR Theory and the Limits and Possibilities of Studying Ethics in World Politics. International Theory, 4 (3), 449–68.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni (2016). ‘Moral Agents of Protection and Supplementary Responsibilities to Protect’ in Bellamy, Alex and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–85.Google Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew (1995). The Paradox of State Strength: Transnational Relations, Domestic Structures, and Security Policy in Russia and the Soviet Union. International Organization, 49 (1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew (1999). Unarmed Forces. The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert (2016a). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92 (5), 1107–25.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert (2016b). A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits and International Legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (1), 87–101.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert (2017). ‘International Climate Politics Between Pluralism and Solidarism. An English School Perspective’ in Corry, Olaf and Stevenson, Hayley eds., Traditions and Trends in Global Environmental Politics: International Relations and the Earth, London: Routledge, 26–44.Google Scholar

Farrell, Theo and Lambert, Hélène (2001). Courting Controversy: International Law, National Norms and American Nuclear Use. Review of International Studies, 27 (3), 309–26.Google Scholar

Ferhani, Adam and Rushton, Simon (2020). The International Health Regulations, COVID-19, and Bordering Practices: Who Gets in, What Gets Out, and Who Gets Rescued? Contemporary Security Policy, 41 (3), 458–77.Google Scholar

Fesmire, Steven (2020). ‘Pragmatist Ethics and Climate Change’ in Miller, Dale and Eggleston, Ben eds., Moral Theory and Climate Change: Ethical Perspectives on a Warming Planet, London: Routledge. Preprint Online.Google Scholar

Festenstein, Matthew (1997). Pragmatism and Political Theory: From Dewey to Rorty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fidler, David P. (2003). SARS: Political Pathology of the First Post-Westphalian Pathogen. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (4), 485–505.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. (2013). ‘Constructivism’ in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve eds., International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161–78.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. (2020). ‘Knowing, Remembering, Showing But Still Not Seeing: Critical Praxis, Slavery and the Modern “We”’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 19–32.Google Scholar

Fierke, Karin M. and Jabri, Vivienne (2019). Global Conversations: Relationality, Embodiment and Power in the Move Towards a Global IR. Global Constitutionalism, 8 (3), 506–35.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn, Sikkink (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52 (4), 887–917.Google Scholar

Franke, Ulrich and Weber, Ralph (2011). At the Papini Hotel: On Pragmatism in the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 18 (4), 669–91.Google Scholar

Fraundorfer, Markus (2015). Brazil’s Emerging Role in Global Governance: Health, Food Security and Bioenergy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fraundorfer, Markus (2022). Global Governance and the Anthropocene, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Freedman, Lawrence (1988). I Exist; Therefore I Deter. International Security, 13 (1), 177–95.Google Scholar

Frega, Roberto (2014a). Between Pragmatism and Critical Theory: Social Philosophy Today. Human Studies, 37 (1), 57–82.Google Scholar

Frega, Roberto (2014b). The Normative Creature: Toward a Practice-Based Account of Normativity. Social Theory and Practice, 40 (1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Frega, Roberto (2017). Pragmatism and Democracy in a Global World. Review of International Studies, 43 (4), 720–41.Google Scholar

Frega, Roberto (2019). Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. In Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frieden, Thomas R. and Buissonnière, Marine (2021). Will a Global Preparedness Treaty Help or Hinder Pandemic Preparedness? BMJ Global Health 6, 1–3 at https://gh.bmj.com/content/6/5/e006297.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg and Kratochwil, Friedrich (2009). On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization 63 (4), 701–31.Google Scholar

Gadinger, Frank (2016). On Justification and Critique: Luc Boltanski’s Pragmatic Sociology and International Relations. International Political Sociology, 10 (3), 187–205.Google Scholar

Gadinger, Frank (2022). ‘The Normativity of International Practices’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualising International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 100–21.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Adrian (2014). What Constitutes a ‘Manifest Failing’? Ambiguous and Inconsistent Terminology and the Responsibility to Protect. International Relations, 28 (4), 428–44.Google Scholar

Garrison, Jim (1999). John Dewey’s Theory of Practical Reasoning, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31 (3), 291–31.Google Scholar

Garrison, Jim (2006). The ‘Permanent Deposit’ of Hegelian Thought in Dewey’s Theory of Inquiry. Educational Theory, 56 (1), 1–37.Google Scholar

Gieryn, Thomas F. (1983). Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–95.Google Scholar

Giesecke, Johan (2019). The Truth about PHEICs. The Lancet, July 5 at www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2819%2931566-1.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke (2014). Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect. A New History, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Glanville, Luke (2016). Does R2P Matter? Interpreting the Impact of a Norm. Cooperation and Conflict, 51 (2), 184–99.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., eds., (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gostin, Lawrence O., Moon, Suerie, and Meier, Benjamin Mason, (2020). Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 1615–19, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33026872/.Google Scholar

Grimmel, Andreas and Hellmann, Gunther (2019). Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science. International Political Sociology, 13 (2), 198–214.Google Scholar

Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Melillo, Margherita (2022). The Uneasy Coexistence of Expertise and Politics in the World Health Organization. Learning from the Experience of the Early Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Organizations Law Review, 19 (2), 301–31.Google Scholar

Guarner, Jeannette (2020). Three Emerging Coronaviruses in Two Decades: The Story of SARS, MERS, and Now COVID-19. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 153 (4), 420–1.Google Scholar

Guéhenno, Jean-Marie (2015). The Fog of Peace. A Memoir of International Peacekeeping in the 21st Century, Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Haas, Ernst B. (1991). ‘Collective Learning: Some Theoretical Speculations’ in Breslauer, George W. and Tetlock, Philip E. eds., Learning in U.S. and Soviet Foreign Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, 62–99.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M. (2017). The Epistemic Authority of Solution-Oriented Global Environmental Assessments. Environmental Science and Policy, 77, 221–4.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M. and Haas, Ernst B. (2002). Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 573–601.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1993). Justification and Application, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions of Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, Tine (2020). Priorities, Partners, Politics: The WHO’s Mandate beyond the Crisis. Global Governance, 26 (4), 535–43.Google Scholar

Hanrieder, Tine and Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian (2014). WHO Decides on the Exception? Securitization and Emergency Governance in Global Health. Security Dialogue, 45 (4), 331–34.Google Scholar

Harman, Sophie (2018). Global Health Governance, in Weiss, Thomas G. and Wilkinson, Rorden eds., International Organization and Global Governance, London and New York: Routledge, 719–31.Google Scholar

Harrabin, Roger (2021). US Climate Envoy Criticized for Optimism over Clean Tech. BBC News, 17 May at bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-57135506.Google Scholar

Harris, John (2020). If Democracy Looks Doomed, Extinction Rebellion May Have an Answer. The Guardian, 30 August at www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/aug/30/extinction-rebellion-democracy-climate-emergency-bill-citizens-assembly.Google Scholar

Hassoun, Nicole (2021). Against Vaccine Nationalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47 (11) 15 February at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33589473/.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan (2017). Introduction. Symposium on Contestation and International Relations. Polity, 49 (1), 100–8.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan (2018). ‘Social Constructivism and International Ethics’ in Steele, Brent J. and Eric Heinze, Eric A. eds., Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations, London: Routledge, 116–29.Google Scholar

He, Ming Fang (2013). East∼West Epistemological Convergence of Humanism in Language, Identity, and Education: Confucius, Makiguchi and Dewey. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12 (1), 61–70.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2012). The Responsibility to Protect. Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2013). The Permanence of Inconsistency. Libya, the Security Council, and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 38 (1), 137–59.Google Scholar

Hehir, Aidan (2019). Hollow Norms and the Responsibility to Protect, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hellmann, Gunther (2009). Beliefs as Rules for Action: Pragmatism as Theory of Thought and Action. International Studies Review, 11 (3), 638–41.Google Scholar

Hellmann, Gunther (2022). ‘Practising Theorizing in Theorizing Practice: Friedrich Kratochwil and Social Inquiry’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Practice as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 72–93.Google Scholar

Herman, Robert G. (1996). ‘Identity, Norms and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War’ in Katzenstein, Peter J. ed., The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 272–316.Google Scholar

Herz, John (1960). International Politics in the Atomic Age, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Hesengerth, Oliver (2015). Global Norms in Domestic Politics: Environmental Norm Contestation in Cambodia’s Hydropower Sector, The Pacific Review, 28 (4) 505–28.Google Scholar

Heymann, David L. (2013). How SARS Was Contained. New York Times, March 14 at www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/opinion/global/how-sars-was-contained.html.Google Scholar

Hilde, Thomas C. (2012). Uncertainty and the Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Deliberation in Climate Change Adaptation. Democratization, 19 (5), 889–911.Google Scholar

Hildebrand, David (2013). ‘Dewey’s Pragmatism: Instrumentalism and Meliorism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 55–82.Google Scholar

Hildreth, Roudy W. (2009). Reconstructing Dewey on Power. Political Theory, 37 (6), 780–807.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Matthew J. (2009). Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron? International Studies Review, 11 (2), 231–52.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Matthew J. (2018). ‘Climate Change’ in Weiss, Thomas and Wilkinson, Rorden eds., International Organization and Global Governance, London: Routledge, 655–66.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren (2021). ‘Practice Approaches in International Political Theory’ in Paipais, Vassilios ed., Perspectives on International Political Theory in Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 87–106.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren (2022). Diplomacy at the Frontlines: Knowing and Ordering in Crisis. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 18 (1), 1–34.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel (1998). Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation. John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today. Political Theory, 26 (6), 763–83.Google Scholar

Hook, Sidney (1959–60). Pragmatism and the Tragic Sense of Life. Proceedings and Address of the American Philosophical Association 33, 5–26.Google Scholar

Hook, Sidney (1974). Education and the Taming of Power, London: Alcove Press.Google Scholar

Hookway, Christopher (2013). ‘“The Principle of Peirce” and the Origins of Pragmatism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–35.Google Scholar

Hoover, Joe (2016). Reconstructing Human Rights. A Pragmatist and Pluralist Inquiry in Global Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23 (1), 171–200.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted (2010). The Logic of Habit in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16 (4), 539–61.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted (2018). Change in International Practices. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 687–711.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted (2022). ‘Critiques of the Practice Turn in IR Theory: Some Responses’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 28–44.Google Scholar

Horner, Rory (2021). Covax Misses Its 2021 Delivery Target – What’s Gone Wrong in the Fight against Vaccine Nationalism? The Conversation, 17 September at https://theconversation.com/covax-misses-its-2021-delivery-target-whats-gone-wrong-in-the-fight-against-vaccine-nationalism-167753.Google Scholar

Howlett, Charles F. (2017). ‘John Dewey: A Pragmatist’s Search for Peace in the Aftermath of Total War’ in Cochran, Molly and Navari, Cornelia eds., Progressivism and US Foreign Policy between the World Wars, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 117–42.Google Scholar

Hughes, Hannah (2015). Bourdieu and the IPCC’s Symbolic Power. Global Environmental Politics, 15 (4), 85–104.Google Scholar

Hughes, Hannah and Paterson, M. (2017). Narrowing the Climate Field: The Symbolic Power of Authors in the IPCC’s Assessment of Mitigation. The Review of Policy Research, 34 (6), 744–66.Google Scholar

Hughes, Lesley and Morgan, Wesley (2021). Good COP, Bad COP: Climate Wins and Losses from Glasgow. Sydney Morning Herald, 14 November at www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/good-cop-bad-cop-climate-wins-and-losses-from-glasgow-20211114-p598rq.html.Google Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew (1998). ‘An Emerging Security Community in South America’ in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael eds., Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228–64.Google Scholar

Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response for the WHO Executive Board (2021a). Second Progress Report, January at https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Independent-Panel_Second-Report-on-Progress_Final-15-Jan-2021.pdf.Google Scholar

Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response for the WHO Executive Board (2021b). COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic, May at https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COVID-19-Make-it-the-Last-Pandemic_final.pdf.Google Scholar

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2001). The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar

International Court of Justice (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Advisory Opinion. 8 July at https://web.archive.org/web/20171013111831/ www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf.Google Scholar

IHR (International Health Regulations) (2005) World Health Organization at www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496.Google Scholar

IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar

IPCC (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2021). Pragmatism and Academic Responsibility. In Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The prospects of substantive theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1945–8.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2022). ‘Between Science and Politics: Friedrich Kratochwil’s Praxis of “Going On”’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 234–54.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (1999). Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3), 291–332.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (2019). Reclaiming the Social: Relationalism in Anglophone International Studies. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 582–600.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert (2000). The Global Covenant. Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacob, Cecilia and Mennecke, Martin (2019). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: A Future Agenda, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

James, William (2000) Gunn, Giles, ed., Pragmatism and Other Writings, New York: Penguin Classics. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

James, William (2005 [1896]). ‘The Will to Believe’ in Capps, John M. and Capps, Donald eds., James and Dewey on Belief and Experience, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

James, William (2011 [1906]) The Moral Equivalent of War Forward by Charles River Editors. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

James, William (2019 [1907]). Pragmatism. DigiReads.com Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Jarvis, Samuel (2022). The Limits of Common Humanity. Motivating the Responsibility to Protect in a Changing Global Order, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Jetschke, Anja and Liese, Andrea (2013). ‘The Power of Human Rights a Decade After: From Euphoria to Contestation?’ in Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn eds., The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26–42.Google Scholar

Joas, Hans (1992). An Underestimated Alternative: America and the Limits of ‘Critical Theory’. Symbolic Interaction, 15 (3), 261–75.Google Scholar

Joas, Hans (1996). The Creativity of Action, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Richard Wyn (2005). ‘On Emancipation: Necessity, Capacity, and Concrete Utopias’ in Booth, Ken ed., Critical Security Studies and World Politics, Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner, 215–35.Google Scholar

Kaag, John (2013). ‘Pragmatism, Militarism and Political Unity’ in Ralston, Shane ed., Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations, Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 71–85.Google Scholar

Kaag, John and Kreps, Sarah (2012). Pragmatism’s Contributions to International Relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25 (2), 191–208.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. ed. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kavalski, Emilian (2018). Guanxi or What Is the Chinese for Relational Theory of World Politics. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18 (3), 397–420.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). Activists beyond Borders : Advocacy Networks in International Politics, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kenkel, Kai Michael and De Rosa, Felippe (2015). Localization and Subsidiarity in Brazil’s Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7 (3–4), 325–49.Google Scholar

Kikoler, Naomi (2016). ‘Guinea: An Overlooked Case of the Responsibility to Prevent in Practice’ in Sharma, Serena K. and Welsh, Jennifer eds., The Responsibility to Prevent. Overcoming the Challenges of Atrocity Prevention, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 304–23.Google Scholar

King, Anthony (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu Against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus. Sociological Theory, 18 (3), 417–33.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan (2019). The Normative Gap in International Organizations Law: The Case of the World Health Organization. International Organizations Law Review, 16 (2), 272–98.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie (1995). Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions Against South Africa. International Organization, 49 (3), 451–78.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie (1999). Norms in International Relations: The Struggle Against Apartheid, London, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Knafo, Samuel (2016). Bourdieu and the Dead End of Reflexivity: On the Impossible Task of Locating the Subject. Review of International Studies, 42 (1), 25–47.Google Scholar

Knopf, Jeffrey W. (2012). The Concept of Nuclear Learning. The Nonproliferation Review, 19 (1), 79–93.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin (2001). ‘Objectual Practice’ in Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin and von Savigny, Eike eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich (2009). ‘Ten Points to Ponder About Pragmatism: Some Critical Reflections on Knowledge Generation in the Social Sciences’ in Bauer, Harry and Brighi, Elisabetta eds., Pragmatism in International Relations, New York: Routledge, 11–25.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich (2011). ‘Making Sense of International Practices’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36–60.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich (2018). Praxis. On Acting and Knowing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Krause, Keith and Williams, Michael C. eds., (1997). Critical Security Studies. Concepts and Strategies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Krishtel, Priti, and Malpani, Rohit (2021). Suspend Intellectual Property Rights for Covid-19 Vaccines. BMJ, 28 May at www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1344.short.Google Scholar

Krook, Mona L. and True, Jacqui (2012). Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18 (1), 103–27.Google Scholar

Kurki, Milja (2020). International Relations in a Relational Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kuyper, J. 2015. ‘Gridlock in Global Climate Change Negotiations: Two Democratic Arguments Against Minilateralism’ in McKinnon, Catriona and Maltais, Aaron eds., The Ethics of Climate Governance, New York: Rowman and Littlefield Press, 67–88.Google Scholar

Lachs, John (2005). Stoic Pragmatism. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 19 (2), 95–106.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. (2013). Theory Is Dead, Long Live Theory: The End of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3), 567–87.Google Scholar

Lakhani, Nina (2021). Cop26 Legitimacy Questioned as Groups Excluded from Crucial Talks. The Guardian, 8 November at www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/08/cop26-legitimacy-questioned-as-groups-excluded-from-crucial-talks.Google Scholar

Lambert, Harry (2022). Tobias Ellwood: The UK Should Support a No-Fly Zone over Ukraine. New Statesman, 25 February at www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2022/02/tobias-ellwood-the-uk-must-support-a-no-fly-zone-over-ukraine.Google Scholar

Lancet (2019). The Politics of PHEIC. The Lancet, June 18 at www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(19)31406-0.pdf.Google Scholar

Lantis, Jeffrey S. and Wunderlich, Carmen (2018). Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation. Review of International Studies, 44 (3), 570–93.Google Scholar

Larsson, Oscar Leonard (2022). The Swedish Covid-19 Strategy and Voluntary Compliance: Failed Securitization or Constitutional Security Management? European Journal of International Security, 7 (2), 226–47.Google Scholar

Leander, Anna (2011). The Promises, Problems, and Potentials of a Bourdieu-Inspired Staging of International Relations. International Political Sociology, 5 (3), 294–313.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned (2012). ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’ in Erskine, Toni and Ned Lebow, Richard eds., Tragedy and International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 63–71.Google Scholar

Lechner, Silviya and Frost, Mervyn (2018). Practice Theory and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Kelley (2015). Revealing Power in Truth: Comment on ‘Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health’. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4 (4), 257–9.Google Scholar

Lee, Kelley and Piper, Julianne (2020). The WHO and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Less Reform, More Innovation. Global Governance, 26 (4), 524–33.Google Scholar

Levitt, Peggy and Merry, Sally (2009). Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, India, China, and the US. Global Networks, 9 (4), 441–61.Google Scholar

Levy, Jack S. (1994). Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2), 279–312.Google Scholar

Lewis, Simon and Maslin, Mark (2021). Five Things You Need to Know about the Glasgow Climate Pact. The Conversation, 13 November at https://theconversation.com/five-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-glasgow-climate-pact-171799.Google Scholar

Lieven, Anatol (2020). Climate Change and the Nation State: The Realist Case. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Light, Andrew (2017). ‘Climate Diplomacy’ in Mark Gardiner, Stephen and Thompson, Allen eds., The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press, 487–500.Google Scholar

Light, Andrew and Katz, Eric, eds. (1996). Environmental Pragmatism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ling, L. H. M. and Nordin, Astrid H. M. (2019). On Relations and Relationality: A Conversation with Friends. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 654–68.Google Scholar

Linklater, Andrew (1998). The Transformation of Political Community. Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Linsenmaier, Thomas, Schmidt, Dennis R. and Spandler, Kilian (2021). On the Meaning(s) of Norms: Ambiguity and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic World. Review of International Studies, 47 (4), 508–27.Google Scholar

Lippmann, Walter (2021 [1925]). The Phantom Public, United States: Wilder Publications.Google Scholar

Livingston, Alexander (2017). Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey’s Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, 111 (3), 522–34.Google Scholar

Livingston, James (2003). War and the Intellectuals: Bourne, Dewey, and the Fate of Pragmatism. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 2 (4), 431–50.Google Scholar

Luck Edward, C. (2019). Could a United Nations Code of Conduct Help Curb Atrocities? A Response to Bolarinwa Adediran. Ethics and International Affairs, 33 (1), 79–87.Google Scholar

Lynch, Cecilia (2020). ‘Friedrich Kratochwil: Prophet of Doubt?’ in Hellmann, Gunther and Steffek, Jens eds., Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics, Bristol: Bristol University Press, 33–50.Google Scholar

MacGilvray, Eric A. (2000). Five Myths about Pragmatism, or against a Second Pragmatic Acquiescence. Political Theory, 28 (4), 480–508.Google Scholar

Marchetti, Sarin (2015). Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Marlier, Grant and Crawford, Neta C. (2013). Incomplete and Imperfect Institutionalisation of Empathy and Altruism in the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ Doctrine. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5 (4), 397–422.Google Scholar

McAfee, Noëlle (2004). Public Knowledge. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 30 (2), 139–57.Google Scholar

McCourt, David M. (2012). What’s at Stake in the Historical Turn? Theory, Practice, and Phronēsis in International Relations. Millennium. Journal of International Studies 41 (1), 23–42.Google Scholar

McCourt, David M. (2022). The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory, Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar

McDonald, Matt (2021). Ecological Security: Climate Change and the Construction of Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McGrath, Matt (2021). COP26: Fossil Fuel Industry Has Largest Delegation at Climate Summit. BBC News, 8 November at www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-59199484.Google Scholar

McLaren, Duncan and Corry, Olaf (2021). Clash of Geofutures and the Remaking of Planetary Order: Faultlines Underlying Conflicts over Geoengineering Governance. Global Policy, 12 (S1), 20–33.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. (2003). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. (2014). Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93 (5), 77–89.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John J. (2018). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities, New Haven: Yale University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Menand, Louis (2002). The Metaphysical Club, London: Flamingo.Google Scholar

Mérand, Frédéric (2010). Pierre Bourdieu and the Birth of European Defense. Security Studies, 19 (2), 342–74.Google Scholar

Miller, David (2001). Distributing Responsibilities. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9 (3), 453–71.Google Scholar

Miller, Marjorie C. (2013). ‘Pragmatism and Feminism’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–48.Google Scholar

Minteer, Ben A. (2012). Refounding Environmental Ethics: Pragmatism, Principle and Practice, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Misak, Cheryl (2004). Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 9–22.Google Scholar

Mitzen, Jennifer (2006). Ontological Security in World Politics. State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Security, 12 (3), 341–70.Google Scholar

Mitzen, Jennifer (2013). Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Molloy, Seán (2014). Pragmatism, Realism and the Ethics of Crisis and Transformation in International Relations. International Theory, 6 (3), 454–89.Google Scholar

Moolenaar, Ronald L., Cassell, Cynthia H., and Knight, Nancy W. (2020). Lessons Learned in Global Health Security Implementation. Health Security 18 (S1) at https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0157.Google Scholar

Mor, Ben D. and Moaz, Zeev (1999). Learning and the Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries: A Strategic Approach. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 17 (1), 1–48.Google Scholar

Morgan, Patrick (2011). ‘The Practice of Deterrence’ in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent eds., International Practices, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 139–73.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. (1964). The Four Paradoxes of Nuclear Strategy. The American Political Science Review, 58 (1), 23–35.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. (1967 [1948]). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. (1974 [1946]). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Morris, Justin (2015). The Responsibility to Protect and the Great Powers: The Tensions of Dual Responsibility. Global Responsibility to Protect, 7 (3–4), 398–421.Google Scholar

Morris, Justin and Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2016). ‘The Responsibility not to Veto: A Responsibility too Far?’ in Bellamy, Alex J. and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–48.Google Scholar

Mullen, Lucia et al. (2020). An analysis of International Health Regulations Emergency Committees and Public Health Emergency of International Concern Designations. BMJ Global Health 5, 1–10 at https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/6/e002502.full.pdf.Google Scholar

Mumford, Lewis (1926). The Golden Dawn. A Study in American Experience and Culture, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Murphy, Craig N. (2018). ‘The Emergence of Global Governance’ in Weiss, Thomas G. and Wilkinson, Rorden eds., International Organization and Global Governance, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 25–36.Google Scholar

Murray, Robert W. (2013). ‘Humanitarianism, Responsibility or Rationality? Evaluating Intervention as State Strategy’ in Hehir, Aidan and Murray, Robert W. eds., Libya: The Responsibility to Protect and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, New York: Palgrave, 15–33.Google Scholar

Muyumba, Walton M. (2009). The Shadow and the Act. Black Intellectual Practice, Jazz Improvisation, and Philosophical Pragmatism, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Naim, Moisés (2009). Minilateralism: The Magic Number to Get Real International Action. Foreign Policy, 173, 135–6.Google Scholar

Nair, Deepak (2019). Saving Face in Diplomacy: A Political Sociology of Face-to-face Interactions in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. European Journal of International Relations, 25 (3), 672–97.Google Scholar

Nance, Mark T. and Patrick Cottrell, M. (2014). A Turn Toward Experimentalism? Rethinking Security and Governance in the Twenty-first Century. Review of International Studies, 40 (2), 277–301.Google Scholar

Narayan, John (2016). John Dewey: The Global Public and Its Problems, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Navari, Cornelia (2011). The Concept of Practice in the English School. European Journal of International Relations, 17 (4), 611–30.Google Scholar

Negrón-Gonzales, Melinda and Contarino, Michael (2014). Local Norms Matter: Understanding National Responses to the Responsibility to Protect. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 20 (2), 255–76.Google Scholar

Neubert, Stefan (2008). ‘Dewey’s Pluralism Reconsidered. Pragmatist and Constructivist Perspectives on Diversity and Difference’ in Garrison, Jim ed., Reconstructing Democracy, Recontextualizing Dewey: Pragmatism and Interactive Constructivism in the Twenty-first Century, Albany: SUNY Press, Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B. (2002a). Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 627–51.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B. (2002b). The English School on Diplomacy. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B. and Pouliot, Vincent (2011). Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian–Western Relations over the Past Millennium. Security Studies, 20 (1), 105–37.Google Scholar

Nicholson, Carol (2013). ‘Education and the Pragmatic Temperament’ in Malachowski, Alan ed., The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–71.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, Reinhold (1927). Does Civilization Need Religion? New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Niebuhr, Reinhold (2001 [1932]). Moral Man and Immoral Society. A Study of Ethics and Politics, London: John Knox Press.Google Scholar

Nordin, Astrid H. M. and Smith, Graham M. (2018). Reintroducing Friendship to International Relations: Relational Ontologies from China to the West. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 18 (3), 369–96.Google Scholar

Nordin, Astrid H. M. and Smith, Graham M. (2019). Relating Self and Other in Chinese and Western Thought. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 636–53.Google Scholar

Nordin, Astrid H. M., et al. (2019). Towards Global Relational Theorizing: A Dialogue Between Sinophone and Anglophone Scholarship on Relationalism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 570–81.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. (2006). Education and Democratic Citizenship: Capabilities and Quality Education. Journal of Human Development, 7 (3), 385–95.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. (1987). Nuclear Learning and U.S.-Soviet Security Regimes. International Organization, 41 (3), 371–402.Google Scholar

Nyman, Jonna (2016). What Is the Value of Security? Contextualising the Negative/Positive Debate. Review of International Studies, 42 (5), 821–39.Google Scholar

Obergassel, Wolfgang, et al. (2021). Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 15 (4), 271–81.Google Scholar

Orr, Shannon K. (2016). Institutional Control and Climate Change Activism at COP 21 in Paris. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (3), 23–30.Google Scholar

Owen, David (2002). Re-orienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 31 (3), 653–73.Google Scholar

Pappas, Gregory Fernando (2012). What Would John Dewey Say about Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Experimentalism? Contemporary Pragmatism, 9 (2), 57–74.Google Scholar

Paterson, Matthew (2014). ‘Climate Re-Public: Practicing Public Space in Conditions of Extreme Complexity’ in Best, Jacqueline and Gheciu, Alexandra eds., The Return of the Public in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–72.Google Scholar

Paul, Elisabeth, Brown, Garrett W. and Ridde, Valery (2020). COVID-19: Time for Paradigm Shift in the Nexus Between Local, National and Global Health. BMJ Global Health, (5), 1–4. https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/4/e002622.full.pdfGoogle Scholar

Peet, Jessica (2020). Eclecticism or Exclusivity? The (Critical) Pragmatist Ethos of (Intersectional) Analytic Eclecticism. International Journal, 75 (3), 420–32.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. (1877). The Fixation of Belief. Popular Science Monthly, November, 1–15 at http://peirce.org/writings/p107.html.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. (1878). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. Popular Science Monthly, January, 286–302 at https://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/Peirce%201878%20Make%20Ideas%20Clear.pdf.Google Scholar

Petrova, Margarita H. (2016). Rhetorical Entrapment and Normative Enticement: How the United Kingdom Turned from Spoiler into Champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly, 60 (3), 387–99.Google Scholar

Plant, Tom and Harries, Matthew (2021). Going Ballistic: The UK’s Proposed Nuclear Build-up. Royal United Services Institute, 16 March at https://rusi.org/commentary/going-ballistic-uk-proposed-nuclear-build.Google Scholar

Podesta, John (2019). The Climate Crisis, Migration, and Refugees. 25 July at www.brookings.edu/research/the-climate-crisis-migration-and-refugees/.Google Scholar

Porter, Patrick (2020). The False Promise of Liberal Order. Nostalgia, Delusion and the Rise of Trump, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent (2008). The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities. International Organization, 62 (2), 257–88.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent (2010). International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent (2013). ‘Methodology’ in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ed., Bourdieu in International Relations. London and New York: Routledge, 45–58.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent (2016a). International Pecking Orders. The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent (2016b). Hierarchy in Practice: Multilateral Diplomacy and Governance of International Security. European Journal of International Security, 1 (1), 5–26.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent (2021). Global Governance in the Age of Epistemic Authority. International Theory, 13 (1), 144–56.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. (2022). ‘Evolution in International Practices’ in Drieschova, Alena, Bueger, Christian and Hopf, Ted eds., Conceptualizing International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition, 170–90.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent and Cornut, Jérémie (2015). Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 50 (3), 297–315.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent and Thérien, Jean-Philippe (2014). The Politics of Inclusion. Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security. Review of International Studies, 41 (2), 211–37.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent and Thérien, Jean-Philippe (2018). Global Governance in Practice. Global Policy, 9 (2), 163–72.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard (2003). Law, Pragmatism and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Prantl, Jochen and Nakano, Ryoko (2011). Global Norm Diffusion in East Asia: How China and Japan Implement the Responsibility to Protect. International Relations, 25 (2), 204–23.Google Scholar

Pratt, Simon Frankel (2020). From Norms to Normative Configurations: A Pragmatist and Relational Approach to Theorizing Normativity in IR. International Theory, 12 (1), 59–82.Google Scholar

Pratt, Simon Frankel (2021). To be a Pragmatist in Explaining in International Politics. In Pratt, Simon Frankel Pratt et al. Forum. Pragmatism in IR: The Prospects of Substantive Theorizing. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 1933–8.Google Scholar

Price, Richard (1997). The Chemical Weapons Taboo, London and Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard (1998). Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization, 52 (3), 613–44.Google Scholar

Price, Richard ed. (2008a). Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard (2008b). ‘Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–52.Google Scholar

Price, Richard (2008c). ‘Progress with a Price’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard (2008d). ‘The Ethics of Constructivism’ in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 317–26.Google Scholar

Price, Richard (2008e). Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. International Organization, 62 (2), 191–220.Google Scholar

Price, Richard M. (2012). On Pragmatic and Principled Limits and Possibilities of Dialogue. International Theory, 4 (3), 477–92.Google Scholar

Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (1998). Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations, 4 (3), 259–94.Google Scholar

Price, Richard and Sikkink, Kathryn (2021). International Norms, Moral Psychology, and Neuroscience (Elements in International Relations), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Propp, Daniel (2021). A Turning Point? COP26 and the Global Fight Against Climate Change. Columbia. SIPA Journal of International Affairs, December 31 online at https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/online-articles/turning-point-cop26-and-global-fight-against-climate-change.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (1995). Pragmatism. An Open Question, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (2004). Ethics without Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Qin, Yaqing (2016). A Relational Theory of World Politics. International Studies Review, 18 (1), 33–47.Google Scholar

Qin, Yaqing (2018). A Relational Theory of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Qin, Yaqing and Nordin, Astrid H. M. (2019). Relationality and Rationality in Confucian and Western Traditions of Thought. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (5), 601–14.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2007). Defending the Society of States Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and Its Vision of World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2013). America’s War on Terror. The State of the American Exception from Bush to Obama, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2015). Symposium: International Criminal Justice and the Responsibility to Protect. Criminal Law Forum, 26 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2016). ‘The International Criminal Court’ in Bellamy, Alex and Dunne, Tim eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 259–94.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2018). What Should Be Done? Pragmatic Constructivist Ethics and the Responsibility to Protect. International Organization, 72 (1), 173–203.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2022). ‘Ukraine and the Responsibility to Protect: The Consequences for the Vulnerable (and the Not Yet Vulnerable) Should be Front and Centre of Our Reasoning’, Fresh Perspectives European Centre for the Responsibility to Protect 8 March at https://ecr2p.leeds.ac.uk/ukraine-and-the-responsibility-to-protect-the-consequences-for-the-vulnerable-and-the-not-yet-vulnerable-should-be-front-and-centre-of-our-reasoning/.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason (2023). ‘Norms, Normativity and Pragmatist Justification. Advancing the “Third Move” in Norm Studies’ in Orchard, Phil and Wiener, Antje eds., Contesting the World: Norm Research in Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason and Gallagher, Adrian (2015). Legitimacy Faultlines in International Society: The Responsibility to Protect and Prosecute After Libya. Review of International Studies, 41 (3), 553–73.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason and Souter, James (2015). A Special Responsibility to Protect: The UK, Australia and the Rise of Islamic State. International Affairs, 91 (4), 709–23.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason and Gifkins, Jess (2017). The Purpose of Security Council Practice. Contesting Competence Claims in the Normative Context Created by the Responsibility to Protect. European Journal of International Relations, 23 (3), 630–53.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason, Holland, Jack and Zhekova, Kalina (2017). Before the Vote: UK Foreign Policy Discourse on Syria 2011–13. Review of International Studies, 43 (5), 875–97.Google Scholar

Ralston, Shane J. ed. (2013). Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations. Essays for a Bold New World, New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Rath, Richard Cullen (1997). Echo and Narcissus: The Afrocentric Pragmatism of W. E. B. Du Bois. The Journal of American History, 84 (2), 461–95.Google Scholar

Ray, Larry (2004). Pragmatism and Critical Theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 7 (3), 307–21.Google Scholar

Reich, Kersten (2008). ‘Democracy and Education after Dewey – Pragmatist Implications for Constructivist Pedagogy’ in Garrison, Jim ed., Reconstructing Democracy, Recontextualizing Dewey: Pragmatism and Interactive Constructivism in the Twenty-first Century, Albany: SUNY Press. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

Ren, Xiao (2020). Grown from within: Building a Chinese School of International Relations. The Pacific Review, 33 (3–4), 386–412.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian (2005). Liberal Hierarchy and the License to Use Force. Review of International Studies, 31 (S1), 71–92.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian (2008). ‘Constructivism and the Structure of Ethical Reasoning’ in Price, Richard ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–82.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian (2013). Beyond Metatheory? European Journal of International Relations, 19 (3), 589–608.Google Scholar

Revkin, Andrew C. and Broder, John M. (2009). A Grudging Accord in Climate Talks. New York Times, 19 December at www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/science/earth/20accord.html.Google Scholar