Gunpowder technology not only changed the nature of warfare, but also changed the trajectory of the early modern world, as Geoffrey Parker has famously argued. Another aspect of the advent of gunpowder technology is that it also changed the way war-making materials were procured. Since the two major materials used to manufacture gunpowder, saltpetre and sulphur, were mostly located in different geographical locations and no one country or region in the early modern world possessed both of them in sufficient quantity to fill its needs for manufactured gunpowder (“black powder”) for waging war, at least one of them had to be procured via trade. Charcoal, the third ingredient, was universally available.

Comparatively speaking, saltpetre played a more important role than sulphur and charcoal in the gunpowder formula. However, existing research on the saltpetre trade has hitherto left much to be desired, especially regarding Asia east of India. For the early modern world (c.1390–1850), saltpetre production and trade have received abundant attention for Europe, the Ottoman empire, and India (especially the trade between India and Europe). Regarding Indian saltpetre, Brenda Buchanan has recognized that acquisition of Indian saltpetre led to the creation of the “British Gunpowder Empire”, while James Frey in his meticulous and global study has argued that it was this Indian saltpetre that made possible the “Military Revolution” in 18th century Europe. Valuable and inspiring as these works are, they are marred by Indocentric views. In Asia east of India, saltpetre refining in Japan and Korea, and saltpetre trade between China, Korea, Japan, Siam and the Philippines, have been treated to some extent, but primarily in Japanese and Korean scholarship; using by and large only Chinese, Korean, and Japanese sources.