Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:41:49.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Ecosystem approach and ocean management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Mario Vierros
Affiliation:
United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies
Ian D. Cresswell
Affiliation:
Oceans National Research Flagship, Australia
Peter Bridgewater
Affiliation:
Beijing Forestry University
Anthony D. M. Smith
Affiliation:
CSIRO’s Wealth from Oceans Research Flagship
Salvatore Aricò
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

6.1 Introduction

The concept of an ecosystem approach has arisen largely as a management response to decline in biodiversity and natural resources, which single species management and primarily sectoral approaches had failed to stem. Because of its integrated nature, an ecosystem approach was seen as a way to better manage multiple impacts on environments holistically while maximizing long-term economic, social, and cultural bene benefits. The ecosystem approach also provides for the involvement of a wide range of users and other stakeholders in the management of a spatial area and resources, thus improving coordination and integration in activities.

Many different ‘ecosystem approaches’ exist, ranging from traditional/indigenous approaches to those more recently adopted by Western societies. The theory of how to manage using the ecosystem as the planning framework is still in its infancy and there is no one correct way to implement an ecosystem approach. However, certain principles apply to all current approaches. Perhaps the two bestknown concepts are the complementary ones in use by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (Garcia et al., 2003) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (UNESCO, 2000; Shepherd, 2008) with related biodiversity conventions. In practice, however, the most widely implemented approaches are in integrated coastal zone (sometimes area) management (ICZM) and integrated water resources management (IWRM), also sometimes expressed as river basin management (RBM). While not formally called ‘ecosystem approaches’, they espouse the use of a whole or integrated system as the base layer for all planning and management.

Approaches to management that use the ecosystem as a basis have become a central concept in the implementation of a number of international and regional agreements, such as those within the CBD (cf. CBD, 2000) and the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (FAO, 2013), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR; cf. Fabra and Gascón, 2008), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR), and the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) – among others.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) Ecological Risk Assessment methodology webpage: www.afma.gov.au/managing-our-fisheries/environment-and-sustainability/ecological-risk-management/ (last visited 6 November 2014).
Barber, M. (2005). Where clouds stand: Australian Aboriginal relationship to water, place and the marine environment in Blue Mud Bay, Northern Territory. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University.
Constable, A. J., de la Mare, W. K., Agnew, D. J., Everson, I., and Miller, D. (2000). Managing fisheries to conserve the Antarctic marine ecosystem: Practical implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 778–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2000), Decision V/6. Ecosystem Approach. Accessed on 1 April 2014. Available online at www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7148.
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2010), Report on the Implementation of the Programme of Work on Marine and Coastal Biological Diversity, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/14/INF/2. Accessed on 1 April 2014. Available online at www.cbd.int/doc/?meeting=sbstta-14.
Convention on Biological Diversity (2012). Decision XI/18, B of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity – Voluntary Guidelines for the Consideration of Biodiversity in Environmental Impact Assessments and Strategic Environmental Assessments in Marine and Coastal Areas. Document UNEP/CBD/COP/11/35.
DOALOS (2007), Ecosystem Approaches and Oceans. Accessed on 1 April 2014. www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/mar/cbwsoi-wafr-01/other/cbwsoi-wafr-01-ea-and-oceans-en.pdf.
Ehler, C. (2011). Marine Spatial Planning in the Arctic: A First Step toward Ecosystem-Based Management. A Report of the Aspen Institute's Dialogue and Commission on Arctic Climate Change. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute, pp. 40–82.Google Scholar
Fabra, A. and Gascón, V. (2008). The Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) and the ecosystem approach. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 23(3): 567–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2003), Fisheries Management. Suppl. 2. The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries No. 4, 124 pp.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2012). The State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture, 2012. Rome: FAO. Accessed on 1 April 2014, www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2727e/i2727e.pdf.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2013), The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management. Rome: FAO. Accessed on 1 April 2014, www.fao.org/fishery/topic/13261/en.
Fulton, E. A., Link, J. S., Kaplan, I. C., et al. (2011). Lessons in modelling and management of marine ecosystems: The Atlantis experience. Fish and Fisheries 12: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S. M., Zerbi, A., Aliaume, C.et al. (2003). The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 443. Rome: FAO, 71 pp.
Hobday, A. J., Smith, A. D. M., Stobutzki, I. C., et al. (2011). Ecological risk assessment for the effects of fishing. Fisheries Research 108: 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JNCC (2012a), Advice to the Scottish Government on the Selection of Nature Conservation Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) for the Development of the Scottish MPA Network. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 547. Accessed 1 April 2014. http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/PDF/SNH%20and%20JNCC%20MPA%20network%20advice%20-%20Final%20report.pdf.
JNCC (2012b), JNCC and Natural England's Advice to Defra on Recommended Marine Conservation Zones. Accessed 1 April 2014. http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/PDF/120718MCZAP_JNCC_NE_MCZ%20advice_final_Executive_Summary.pdf.
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., et al. (2004). Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305: 346–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitcher, T., Kalikoski, D., Pramod, G.et al. (2009). Not honouring the code. Nature 457: 658–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruddle, K. and Hickey, F. R. (2008). Accounting for the mismanagement of tropical nearshore fisheries. Environment, Development and Sustainability 10(5): 565–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, G. (ed.) (2008). The Ecosystem Approach: Learning from Experience. Gland: IUCN, 190 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO (1996). Biosphere Reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework of the World Network. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO (2000). Solving the Puzzle: The Ecosystem Approach and Biosphere Reserves. Paris: UNESCO, 31 pp.
Vierros, M., Douvere, F., and Aricò, S. (2006). Implementing the Ecosystem Approach in Open Ocean and Deep Sea Environments. Tokyo and Yokohama: United Nations University – Institute of Advanced Studies, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Vierros, M., Tawake, A., Hickey, F., et al. (2010). Traditional Marine Management Areas of the Pacific in the Context of National and International Law and Policy. Darwin: United Nations University Traditional Knowledge Initiative, 87 pp.Google Scholar
Yamada, T., Hashimoto, H., and Muroishi, Y. (2011). Sato-umi policy in Japan. [Powerpoint slides]. Office for Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas, Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Available at www.emecs.or.jp/emecs9/EMECS9_Satoumi/10-2_Chino.pdf. Accessed June 2014.
Yanagi, T. (2008) ‘Sato-Umi’ – A new concept for sustainable fisheries. In: Fisheries for Global Welfare and Environment. Tsukamoto, K., Kawamura, T., Takeuchi, T., Beard, T. D. Jr., and Kaiser, M. J. (eds.). 5th World Fisheries Congress, 2008, 351–358.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×