Rosenorn-Lanng, D. Human Factors in Healthcare, Level 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CHFG Clinical Human Factors Group. Key human factors messages when working under pressure. https://chfg.org.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2014–16. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2018.Google Scholar

Weindling, AM. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Arch Dis Childhd. 2003;88(12):1034–7.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: 2018 Progress Report. London: RCOG; 2018.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: Themed report on anaesthetic care, including lessons identified from Each Baby Counts babies born 2015 to 2017. London: RCOG; 2018.Google Scholar

Coroyannakis, C, Chandraharan, E, Matiluko, A. Comparative analysis of the human ‘WORM’: role of human factors on adverse incidents in two adjacent obstetric units in London. BJOG. 2013;120(1):413.Google Scholar

Vosper, H, Hignett, S, Bowie, P. () Twelve tips for embedding human factors and ergonomics principles in healthcare education. Med Teacher. 2018;40(4):357–63, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1387240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Russ, AL, Fairbanks, RJ, Karsh, B-T, Militello, LG, Saleem, JJ, Wears, RL. The science of human factors: separating facts from fiction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:802–8.Google Scholar

Jackson, K, Hayes, K, Hinshaw, K. The relevance of non-technical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. TOG. 2013;15:269–74.Google Scholar

Endsley, M. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flin, R, O’Connor, P, Crichton, M. Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 2008.Google Scholar

Chabris, C, Simons, D. The Invisible Gorilla and Other Ways Our Intuition Deceives Us. London: HarperCollins; 2011.Google Scholar

Nzelu, O, Chandraharan, E, Pereira, S. Human factors: the dirty dozen in CTG misinterpretation. Glob J Reprod Med. 2018;6(2):GJORM.MS.ID.555683.Google Scholar

Bahl, R, Murphy, DJ, Strachan, B. Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(2):147–51.Google Scholar

NICE. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth; 2014. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG190Google Scholar

Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign Tools: SBAR communication tool- situation, background, assessment, recommendation. ACT academy- Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. NHS Improvement. https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/2162/sbar-communication-tool.pdfGoogle Scholar

Francis, R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationary Office; 2013.Google Scholar

West, M, Eckert, R, Steward, K, Pasmore, B. Developing collective leadership for healthcare. King’s Fund, 2014. www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/developing-collective-leadership-kingsfund-may14.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hasson, G. Emotional Intelligence. Chichester: Capstone; 2014.Google Scholar

Yule, S, Flin, R, Maran, N, et al. Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behaviour rating system. World J Surg. 2008;32:548–56.Google Scholar

Jackson, S, Brackley, K, Landau, A, Hayes, K. Assessing non-technical skills on the delivery suite: a pilot study. Clin Teach. 2014;11(5):375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Easterbrook, JA. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1959;66(3):183–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hanoch, Y, Vitouch, O. When less is more: information, emotional arousal and the ecological reframing of the Yerkes–Dodson Law. Theory Psychol. 2004;14(4): 427–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nzelu, O, Chandraharan, E, Pereira, S. Human factors: the dirty dozen in CTG misinterpretation. Glob J Reprod Med. 2018;6(2):555683.Google Scholar

Kimmich, N, Zimmermann, R, Kreft, M. Video analysis for the evaluation of vaginal births: a prospective observational study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148:w14634.Google Scholar

Gavin, NR, Satin, AJ. Simulation training in obstetrics. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(4):802–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2006–2008. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118 (Suppl. 1):1–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crofts, JF, Bartlett, C, Ellis, D, et al. Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108 (6):1477–85.Google Scholar

Siassakos, D, Fox, R, Bristowe, K, Angouri, J, Hambly, H, Robson, L, Draycott, TJ. What makes maternity teams effective and safe? Lessons from a series of research on teamwork, leadership and team training. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(11):1239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

van de Ven, J, Fransen, AF, Schuit, E, van Runnard Heimel, PJ, Mol, BW, Oei, SG. Does the effect of one-day simulation team training in obstetric emergencies decline within one year? A post-hoc analysis of a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:79–84.Google Scholar

Fernandez, R, Shah, S, Rosenman, R, et al. Developing team cognition: a role for simulation. Simulat Healthcare 2017;12(2)96–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheng, A, Eppich, W, Grant, V, et al. Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Med Educ. 2014;48(7):657–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sawyer, T, Eppich, W, Brett- Fleegler, M, et al. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simulat Healthcare. 2016;11(3):209–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siassakos, D, Crofts, J, Winter, C, Draycott, T. Multiprofessional ‘fire-drill’ training in the labour ward. Obstet Gynaecologist. 2009;11:55–60.Google Scholar

Draycott, T, Sibanda, T, Owen, L, et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113(2):177–82.Google Scholar

Draycott, TJ, Crofts, JF, Ash, JP, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crofts, JF, Enguerrand, E, Bentham, GL, et al. Prevention of brachial injury: 12 years of shoulder dystocia training – an interrupted time-series study. BJOG. 2016;123: 111–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gossett, DR, Gilchrist-Scott, D, Wayne, DB, et al. Simulation training for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:429–35.Google Scholar

Nelissen, E, Ersdl, H, Mduma, E, et al. Clinical performance and patient outcome after simulation-based training in prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage: an educational intervention study in a low resource setting. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenguerrand, E, Winter, C, Innes, K, et al. THISTLE: trial of hands-on Interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies: a research protocol for a stepped-wedge clustered randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illston, JD, Ballard, AC, Ellington, DR, et al. Modified beef tongue for fourth- degree laceration repair simulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:491–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nitsche, JF, Brost, BC. Obstetric ultrasound simulation. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alkema, L, Chou, D, Hogan, D, Zhang, S, Moller, AB, Gemmill, A. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group., et al. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Say, L, Chou, D, Gemmill, Alison, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Callaghan, WM, Berg, C., S. et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knight, M, Nair, M, Tuffnell, D, Shakespeare, J, Kenyon, S, Kurinczuk, JJ (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. Oxford: National Perinatal. Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2017.Google Scholar

MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Surveillance of Maternal Deaths in the UK 2012–14 and Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–14. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2016.Google Scholar

Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Kurinczuk, JJ, Smith, PW, Boby, T, Smith, LK, Manktelow, BN, on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK Collaboration. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2016: Summary Report. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester; 2018.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: 2018 Progress Report. London: RCOG; 2018.Google Scholar

Nzelu, O, Chandraharan, E, Pereira, S. Human factors: the dirty dozen in CTG misinterpretation. Glob J Reprod Med. 2018;6(2):555683.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: 2019 Progress Report. London: RCOG; 2020. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/research--audit/each-baby-counts/each-baby-counts-2019-progress-report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Department of Health. An organisation with a memory: Report of an Expert Advisory Group on learning from Adverse Events in the NHS. London: The Stationary Office; 2000.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Midwives and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Safer Childbirth: Minimum Standards for the Organisation and Delivery of Care in Labour. London: RCOG Press; 2007.Google Scholar

Royal College of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Standards for Maternity Care. Report of a Working Party. London: RCOG Press; 2008.Google Scholar

NHS Litigation Authority. Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18. NHS Resolution. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/NHS-Resolution-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

NHS Resolution. Five years of cerebral palsy claims. A thematic review of NHS resolution data. September 2017. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Five-years-of-cerebral-palsy-claims_A-thematic-review-of-NHS-Resolution-data.pdfGoogle Scholar

Neilson, PE, Goldman, MB, Mann, S, et al. Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labour and delivery: a randomised control trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:48–55.Google Scholar

Schofield, H. Embedding quality improvement and patient safety at Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 21(4):593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Improving Patient Safety: Risk Management for Maternity and Gynaecology. Clinical Governance Advice No. 2. London: RCOG; 2009.Google Scholar

Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Kurinczuk, JJ, Smith, PW, Boby, T, Smith, LK, Manktelow, BN, on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK Collaboration. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2016. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester. 2018.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Midwives, National Patient Safety Agency. Safer Practice in Intrapartum Care Project Care Bundles. London: RCOG Press; 2010.Google Scholar

NHS Resolution. The Maternity Incentive Scheme for 2019/2020. https://resolution.nhs.uk/services/claims-management/clinical-schemes/clinical-negligence-scheme-for-trusts/maternity-incentive-schemeGoogle Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Serious untoward incident. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2007;17(5):163–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peerally, MF, Carr, S, Waring, J, Dixon-Woods, M. The problem with root cause analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;0:1–6.Google Scholar

ACT Academy of NHS Improvement. Root cause analysis using five whys. https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/root-cause-analysis-using-five-whys/Google Scholar

National Quality Board. Human factors in healthcare. www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/nqb-hum-fact-concord.pdfGoogle Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Maternity Dashboard: Clinical Performance and Governance Scorecard. Good Practice No. 7. London: RCOG; 2008.Google Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. The role of clinical dashboards in improving patient care: experience with the ‘Maternity Dashboard’. Ceylon Med J. 2016;61(2):83–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Clinical governance. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2007;17(7):222–4.Google Scholar