Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:55:13.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Purposes and Perspectives on Classroom Observation Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
Education Research Specialist, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) at the University of California, Santa Cruz
Hersh C. Waxman
Affiliation:
Professor of Educational Leadership and Cultural Studies in the College of Education, University of Houston; Principal Researcher in the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence; Principal Investigator in the U.S. Department of Education, National Laboratory for Student Success, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
Director, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE); Professor of Education and Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz
Hersh C. Waxman
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
R. Soleste Hilberg
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

The purpose of this book is to provide researchers, scholars, and educators with examples of recently developed classroom observation instruments based on current research on effective teaching practices, many developed explicitly for use in today's culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. The chapters describe several new instruments and include examples of how they have been used to examine effective instruction, schools, and school-based reform models in classrooms and schools with diverse students. Although most observational research in culturally and linguistically diverse settings has been qualitative, systematic classroom observation research has been widely used during the past three decades (Waxman, 1995; Waxman & Huang, 1999). And, although findings from that research have led to a substantive knowledge base on effective teaching practices (Brophy & Good, 1986; Waxman & Walberg, 1982), many critics have argued that systematic observation lacks a theoretical/conceptual framework and merely focuses on discrete categories or small segments of observable teacher behaviors that can be easily measured with observation instruments (Ornstein, 1991). Indeed, most of the early observation instruments focused on direct instruction and easily quantifiable behaviors associated with basic skills instruction, rendering them inappropriate, or when used alone inadequate, for examining today's diverse classrooms. Today, researchers and educators need instruments based on the most recent theoretical/conceptual work and empirical research on effective pedagogy (Tharp, Estrada, Dalton, & Yamauchi, 2000; Waxman & Walberg, 1999). This book presents a rich variety of such instruments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
New Approaches for Understanding Cultural and Linguistic Diversity
, pp. 1 - 20
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, L. W., & Burns, R. B. (1989). Research in classrooms: The study of teachers, teaching, and instruction. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Brophy, J. E. (1979). Using observation to improve your teaching (Occasional Paper No. 21). East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher–student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan
Copley, J. V., & Williams, S. E. (1993). Systematic classroom observations of technology use. In H. C. Waxman & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Approaches to research on teacher education and technology (pp. 113–122). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education
Doyle, W. (1979). Making managerial decisions in classrooms. In D. L. Duke (Ed.), Classroom management (pp. 42–74). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education
Ebmeier, H., & Good, T. L. (1979). The effects of instructing teachers about good teaching on the mathematics achievement of fourth-grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiman, S. (1981). Exploring connections between different kinds of educational research and different conceptions of inservice education. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 14(2), 11–21Google Scholar
Fennema, E., & Peterson, P. L. (1987). Effective teaching for girls and boys: The same or different? In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 111–125). New York: Random House
Freiberg, H. J., & Waxman, H. C. (1988). Alternative feedback approaches for improving student teachers' classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiberg, H. J., Waxman, H. C., & Houston, W. R. (1987). Enriching feedback to student-teachers through small group discussion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 14(3), 71–82Google Scholar
Gage, N. L. (1972). Teacher effectiveness and teacher education. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific
Good, T. L. (1988). Observational research … grounding theory in classrooms. Educational Psychologist, 25, 375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, T. L., & Biddle, B. (1988). Research and the improvement of mathematics instruction: The need for observational resources. In D. Grouws & T. Cooney (Eds.), Research agenda for mathematics education: Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 114–142). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1974). Changing teacher and student behavior: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2000). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York: Longman
Good, T. L., & Grouws, D. (1979). The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An experimental study in fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of questioning-asking in K–12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., & Mason, D. A. (1988). Learning to ask questions: Grade and school effects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 363–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, L. E. (1989). Classroom processes, sex of students, and confidence in learning mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 242–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. L., & Waxman, H. C. (1996). Classroom observations of middle school students' technology use in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. W. (1974). Affective outcomes. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance (pp. 99–112). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
McKinney, K. (1992). Improving math and science teaching. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education
Medley, D. M. (1992). Structured observation. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 1310–1315). New York: Macmillan
Merkley, D. M., & Hoy, M. P. (1992–1993). Observation as a component in teacher preparation. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 2, 15–21Google Scholar
Nuthall, G., & Alton-Lee, A. (1990). Research on teaching and learning: Thirty years of change. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 546–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, A. C. (1991). Teacher effectiveness research: Theoretical consideration. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 63–80). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
Padrón, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1993). Teaching and learning risks associated with limited cognitive mastery in science and mathematics for limited proficient students. In Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs (Ed.), Proceedings of the third national research symposium on limited English proficient students: Focus on middle and high school issues (Vol. 2, pp. 511–547). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education
Padrón, Y. N., Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1999). Classroom and instructional learning environment differences between resilient and non-resilient elementary school students. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk of Failure, 4(1), 63–81Google Scholar
Rosenshine, B. V. (1987). Explicit teaching. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 75–92). New York: Random House
Rosenshine, B. V., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan
Saldana, D. C., & Waxman, H. C. (1996). The interrogation of multicultural education in urban middle level schools. Issues in Middle Level Education, 5(2), 9–29Google Scholar
Saldana, D. C., & Waxman, H. C. (1997). An observational study of multicultural teaching in urban middle level schools. Equity and Excellence in Education, 30(1), 40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, E., Stringfield, S., & Wolfe, D. (1992). An innovative beginning teacher induction program: A two-year analysis of classroom interactions. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirotnik, K. A. (1983). What you see is what you get – Consistency, persistency, and mediocrity in classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 16–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, J. A. (1980). Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task. Educational Researcher, 9(11), 11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, J. A., & Freiberg, H. J. (1991). Observation for the improvement of teaching. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 107–133). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
Stallings, J. A., & Mohlman, G. G. (1988). Classroom observation techniques. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 469–474). Oxford: Pergamon Press
Stallings, J. A., Needels, M. C., & Sparks, G. M. (1987). Observation for the improvement of student learning. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 129–158). New York: Random House
Stallings, J. A., Needels, M. C., & Stayrook, N. (1979). How to change the process of teaching basic reading skills at the secondary school level. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International
Stodolsky, S. S. (1990). Classroom observation. In J. Milllman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 175–190). Newbury Park, CA: SageCrossRef
Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1991). Observers as predictors of schools' multiyear outlier status on achievement tests. The Elementary School Journal, 91(4), 357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teddlie, C., Kirby, P., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Effective vs. ineffective schools: Observable differences in the classroom. American Journal of Education, 97(3), 221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press
Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S. S., & Yamauchi, L. (2000). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Timm, J. T., & Marchant, G. J. (1992). Using a structured observational instrument in observational settings in teacher education. Teaching Education, 5, 65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walberg, H. J. (1986). Synthesis of research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 214–229). New York: Macmillan
Walberg, H. J. (1991). Productive teaching and instruction: Assessing the knowledge base. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 33–62). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
Walberg, H. J. (1995). Generic practices. In G. Cawelti (Ed.), Handbook of research on improving student achievement (pp. 7–19). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Services
Waxman, H. C. (1995). Classroom observations of effective teaching. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Teaching: Theory into practice (pp. 76–93). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1995). An observational study of technology integration in urban elementary and middle schools. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 329–339Google Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1996–1997). Differences by level of technology use on students' motivation, anxiety, and classroom learning environment in mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25(1), 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1997). Classroom instruction and learning environment differences between effective and ineffective urban elementary schools for African American students. Urban Education, 32, 7–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. L. (1999). Classroom observation research and the improvement of teaching. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 107–129). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
Waxman, H. C., Huang, S. L., Anderson, L. W., & Weinstein, T. (1997). Classroom process differences in inner-city elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, H. C., Huang, S. L., & Padrón, Y. N. (1995). Investigating the pedagogy of poverty in inner-city middle level schools. Research in Middle Level Education, 18(2), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Padrón, Y. N. (2002). Research-based teaching practices that improve the education of English language learners. In L. Minaya-Rowe (Ed.), Teacher training and effective pedagogy in the context of student diversity (pp. 3–38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age
Waxman, H. C., Padrón, Y. N., & Arnold, K. A. (2001). Effective instructional practices for students placed at risk of failure. In G. D. Borman, S. C. Stringfield, & R. E. Slavin (Eds.), Title I: Compensatory education at the crossroads (pp. 137–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Waxman, H. C., Rodriguez, J., Padrón, Y. N., & Knight, S. L. (1988). The use of systematic classroom observations during field experience components of teacher education programs. The College Student Journal, 22, 199–202Google Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). The relation of teaching and learning: A review of reviews of process-product research. Contemporary Education Review, 1, 103–120Google Scholar
Waxman, H. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Effects of early field experiences. In J. D. Raths & L. G. Katz (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 165–184). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Waxman, H. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1999). New directions for teaching practice and research. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction: Purposes and Perspectives on Classroom Observation Research
    • By R. Soleste Hilberg, Education Research Specialist, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Hersh C. Waxman, Professor of Educational Leadership and Cultural Studies in the College of Education, University of Houston; Principal Researcher in the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence; Principal Investigator in the U.S. Department of Education, National Laboratory for Student Success, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory, Roland G. Tharp, Director, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE); Professor of Education and Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Edited by Hersh C. Waxman, University of Houston, Roland G. Tharp, University of California, Santa Cruz, R. Soleste Hilberg, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Book: Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
  • Online publication: 23 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616419.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction: Purposes and Perspectives on Classroom Observation Research
    • By R. Soleste Hilberg, Education Research Specialist, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Hersh C. Waxman, Professor of Educational Leadership and Cultural Studies in the College of Education, University of Houston; Principal Researcher in the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence; Principal Investigator in the U.S. Department of Education, National Laboratory for Student Success, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory, Roland G. Tharp, Director, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE); Professor of Education and Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Edited by Hersh C. Waxman, University of Houston, Roland G. Tharp, University of California, Santa Cruz, R. Soleste Hilberg, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Book: Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
  • Online publication: 23 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616419.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction: Purposes and Perspectives on Classroom Observation Research
    • By R. Soleste Hilberg, Education Research Specialist, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE) at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Hersh C. Waxman, Professor of Educational Leadership and Cultural Studies in the College of Education, University of Houston; Principal Researcher in the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence; Principal Investigator in the U.S. Department of Education, National Laboratory for Student Success, the Mid-Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory, Roland G. Tharp, Director, Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence (CREDE); Professor of Education and Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Edited by Hersh C. Waxman, University of Houston, Roland G. Tharp, University of California, Santa Cruz, R. Soleste Hilberg, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Book: Observational Research in U.S. Classrooms
  • Online publication: 23 November 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616419.001
Available formats
×