Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2016
ABSTRACT
Scotland and Norway started the nineteenth century as political cousins with seemingly similar structural features with regard to the political unions in which they took part. Yet from that point onwards their national development diverged. Norway turned out to become a rapidly developing, consensus-oriented and egalitarian nation-state, where democratisation ran parallel with the pursuit of national autonomy. Its Scottish cousin, meanwhile, remained embedded in the Union of Great Britain. It was characterised by adversarial politics and sharp social inequalities and saw its national aspirations run awry. How and why two countries with a shared point of departure evolved into entities that differ so profoundly today provides the puzzle for this chapter. We assess the perceived similarity between Scotland and Norway at the start of the period, analyse the differences in the social and political models today and trace the factors that may account for how the gap appeared. Finally, we consider the implications for an independent Scotland with this historical backdrop.
INTRODUCTION
The longue durée of Scottish and Norwegian history gives ample reason to place the two under the same light of scrutiny. Both nations were unified as seaward empire-nations in the Middle Ages, only to move towards peripheral status under a stronger neighbouring centre during the phase of accelerated nationbuilding from the sixteenth century onwards. They both turned Protestant in the Reformation and concentrated heavy responsibility for cultural development and education in their State Churches. Both Norwegians and Scots, furthermore, maintained − even during the peak periods of political integration under the dominant external centre − distinctive legal traditions and institutions as well as urban corporations with some independence in their external trade relations. Finally, in cultural terms, both countries harboured progressive rural movements with the potential to forge links with an emerging industrial working class.
In the run-up to the referendum on Scottish independence in 2014 an argument has been made − especially by proponents for independence − that Scotland should regenerate its relations across the North Sea. However, as we will argue in this chapter, in social and political terms Scotland and Norway have diverged widely from a seemingly similar structural position, thus complicating any claim to familiarity today.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.