Normative Transformation and the War on Terrorism The Evolution of Targeted Killing, Torture, and Private Military Contracting
Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Normative Transformation and the War on TerrorismThe Evolution of Targeted Killing, Torture, and Private Military Contracting, pp. 181 - 206Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abraham, Kavi Joseph, and Abramson, Yehonatan. 2015. ‘A Pragmatist Vocation for International Relations: The (Global) Public and Its Problems’. European Journal of International Relations 23(1): 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsen, Rita, and Williams, Michael C.. 2009. ‘Security Beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics’. International Political Sociology 3(1): 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00060.x.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’. International Organization 58(2): 239–75. doi:10.1017/S0020818304582024.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Spencer. 2014. ‘Torture Victims Will Bear Psychological Scars Long after CIA Report Scandal Fades’. The Guardian, 13 December. www.theguardian.com/law/2014/dec/13/learned-helplessness-enduring-effects-torture-haunt-victims.Google Scholar
Acuto, Michele, and Curtis, Simon. 2014. ‘Assemblage Thinking and International Relations’. In Reassembling International Theory, edited by Acuto, Michele and Curtis, Simon, pp. 1–15. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Adamson, Fiona B. 2016. ‘Spaces of Global Security: Beyond Methodological Nationalism’. Journal of Global Security Studies 1(1): 19–35.Google Scholar
Adamson, Fiona B., and Demetriou, Madeleine. 2007. ‘Remapping the Boundaries of “State” and “National Identity”: Incorporating Diasporas into IR Theorizing’. European Journal of International Relations 13(4): 489–526. doi: 10.1177/1354066107083145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Greve, Patricia. 2009. ‘When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance’. Review of International Studies 35(S1): 59–84.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3(1): 1–36. doi:10.1017/S175297191000031X.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ed. 2013. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca 2014. ‘Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society’. International Organization 68(1): 143–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, John. 1994. ‘The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory’. Review of International Political Economy 1(1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. 1987. John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience, and Nature. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Allinson, Jamie. 2015. ‘The Necropolitics of Drones’. International Political Sociology 9(2): 113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T. 1971. The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T., and Halperin, Morton H.. 1972. ‘Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications’. World Politics 24(1): 40–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1982. ‘Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action’. British Journal of Sociology 33(4): 455–83.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, Ronald. 2009. Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D. 2005. The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah D. 2007. ‘Selling Security: Trade-Offs in State Regulation of the Private Security Industry’. In Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects, edited by Jäger, Thomas and Gerhard, Kümmel, pp. 419–42. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D. 2016. ‘Pragmatic Networks and Transnational Governance of Private Military and Security Services’. International Studies Quarterly 60(2): 330–42.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1986. ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms’. American Political Science Review 80(4): 1095–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banka, Andris, and Quinn, Adam. 2018. ‘Killing Norms Softly: US Targeted Killing, Quasi-Secrecy and the Assassination Ban’. Security Studies 27(4): 665–703.Google Scholar
Banks, William C., and Raven-Hansen, Peter. 2003. ‘Targeted Killing and Assassination: The US Legal Framework’. University of Richmond Law Review 37: 667–749.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel. 2003. ‘Realist Constructivism’. International Studies Review 5(3): 325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel, and Cronin, Bruce. 1994. ‘The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations’. International Organization 48(1): 107. doi:10.1017/S0020818300000837.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2005. ‘Humanitarianism Transformed’. Perspectives on Politics 3(4): 723–40. doi:10.1017/S1537592705050401.Google Scholar
Baynes, Kenneth. 2004. ‘The Transcendental Turn: Habermas’ “Kantian Pragmatism”’. In The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory, edited by Rush, Fred, pp. 194–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beisheim, Marianne, and Dingwerth, Klaus. 2008. ‘Procedural Legitimacy and Private Transnational Governance: Are the Good Ones Doing Better?’. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, no. 11. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2015. ‘Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices’. In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., pp. 3–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472.Google Scholar
Beres, Louis R. 1991. ‘The Permissibility of State-Sponsored Assassination During Peace and War’. Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 5: 231.Google Scholar
Bernales Ballesteros, Enrique. 1998. ‘Report on the Question of the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Rights of Peoples to Self-Determination’. Geneva: UN Commission on Human Rights, 55th Session.Google Scholar
Bernales Ballesteros, Enrique 2003. ‘Report on the Question of the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Violating Human Rights and Impeding the Exercise of the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination’. Geneva: UN Commission on Human Rights, 60th Session. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/515408.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, Betsill, Michele, Hoffmann, Matthew, and Paterson, Matthew. 2010. ‘A Tale of Two Copenhagens: Carbon Markets and Climate Governance’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(1): 161–73.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, Lebow, R. N., Stein, J. G., and Weber, S.. 2000. ‘God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World’. European Journal of International Relations 7(1): 43–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006001003.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2005. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier. 2011. ‘Pierre Bourdieu and International Relations: Power of Practices, Practices of Power’. International Political Sociology 5: 225–58. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00132.x.Google Scholar
Binder, Martin. 2007. ‘Norms versus Rationality: Why Democracies Use Private Military Companies in Civil Wars’. In Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects, edited by Jäger, Thomas and Gerhard, Kümmel, pp. 307–20. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Blum, Gabriella, and Heymann, Philip. 2010. ‘Law and Policy of Targeted Killing’. Harvard National Security Journal 1(1): 145–70.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1999. ‘Practical Reason and Cultural Constraint: Agency in Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice’. In Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, edited by Shusterman, Richard, 129–52. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc. 2012. Love and Justice as Competences: Three Essays on the Sociology of Action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent, Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A, and Risse, Thomas. 2010. ‘Governance without a State: Can It Work?’ Regulation & Governance 4(2): 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 1998. ‘Limitations of Rational Choice Theory 1’. American Journal of Sociology 104(3): 817–28.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine. 2008. ‘Chaoplexic Warfare or the Future of Military Organization’. International Affairs 84(5): 915–29.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher S., and Matt, McDonald. 2013. ‘The Future of Critical Security Studies: Ethics and the Politics of Security’. European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 235–55.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2011. ‘Interactional International Law: An Introduction’. International Theory 3(2): 307–18.Google Scholar
Bucher, Bernd. 2014. ‘Acting Abstractions: Metaphors, Narrative Structures, and the Eclipse of Agency’. European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 742–65. doi:10.1177/1354066113503481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. 2014. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank 2015. ‘The Play of International Practice’. International Studies Quarterly 59(3): 449–60.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, Harriet. 2010. ‘Cities and the Governing of Climate Change’. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35: 229–53.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, Harriet, and Newell, Peter. 2015. Governing Climate Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole, and Jaap, De Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1998. ‘Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory’. American Journal of Sociology 104(3): 846–71.Google Scholar
Cameron, Lindsey, and Chetail, Vincent. 2013. Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cancian, Francesca M. 1975. What Are Norms? A Study of Beliefs and Action in a Maya Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carmola, Kateri. 2010. Private Security Contractors and New Wars: Risk, Law, and Ethics. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carvin, Stephanie. 2012. ‘The Trouble with Targeted Killing’. Security Studies 21(3): 529–55.Google Scholar
Carvin, Stephanie 2015. ‘Getting Drones Wrong’. International Journal of Human Rights 19(2): 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvin, Stephanie, and Williams, Michael John. 2015. Law, Science, Liberalism, and the American Way of Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
‘Case of Ireland v. The United Kingdom’. 1978. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:%5B%22001-57506%22%5D%7D.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 2008. ‘The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 78–93.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1997. ‘International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide’. European Journal of International Relations 3(4): 473–95.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon, and Lehnardt, Chia, eds. 2007. From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Richard A. 2004. Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Simon. 2006. ‘Theory and Practice: Psychoanalytic Sociology as Psycho-Social Studies’. Sociology 40(6): 1153–69. doi:10.1177/0038038506069855.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly. 2012. ‘Pragmatism and International Relations: A Story of Closure and Opening’. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6(1):138–58.Google Scholar
Coll, Stephen. 2004. Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Coll, Stephen 2014. ‘The Unblinking Stare’. The New Yorker, November 24. www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/11/24/unblinking-stare.Google Scholar
Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate. 2008. Inquiry Into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody, Volume 4.Google Scholar
‘Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’. 1984. UN General Assembly.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana. 2013. ‘Agentic Capacities and Capacious Historical Materialism: Thinking with New Materialisms in the Political Sciences’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(3): 451–69.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W.. 1996. ‘How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms’. International Studies Quarterly 40(4): 451–78.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W. 2005. ‘When Norms Clash: International Norms, Domestic Practices, and Japan’s Internalisation of the GATT/WTO’. Review of International Studies 31(1): 3–25. doi:10.1017/S0260210505006273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craib, Ian. 1990. Psychoanalysis and Social Theory. Amhurst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta 2003. ‘Just War Theory and the Iraq War’. Perspectives on Politics 1(1): 5–25.Google Scholar
Croft, Stuart. 2006. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, Stuart 2012. ‘Constructing Ontological Insecurity: The Insecuritization of Britain’s Muslims’. Contemporary Security Policy 33(2): 219–35.Google Scholar
De Goede, Marieke. 2008. ‘Beyond Risk: Premediation and the Post-9/11 Security Imagination’. Security Dialogue 39(2–3): 155–76.Google Scholar
De Nevers, Renee. 2009. ‘(Self) Regulating War? Voluntary Regulation and the Private Security’. Security Studies 18: 479–516. doi:10.1080/09636410903132854.Google Scholar
del Prado, José L. Gómez. 2008. ‘Private Military and Security Companies and the UN Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries’. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13(3): 429–50.Google Scholar
Department of Justice. 2012. ‘Lawfulness of a Lethal Operation Directed against a U.S. Citizen Who Is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa’ida or an Associated Force’. White paper. http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/020413_DOJ_White_Paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Depélteau, François. 2013. ‘What Is the Direction of the “Relational Turn?”’. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology, edited by Powell, Christopher and François, Dépelteau, pp. 163–86. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deudney, Daniel. 2000. ‘Geopolitics as Theory: Historical Security Materialism’. European Journal of International Relations 6(1): 77–107.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1978. The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, Volume 6: 1910–1911, Journal Articles, Book Reviews, Miscellany in the 1910–11 Period, and How We Think. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John 1983. The Middle Works of John Dewey, 1899–1924, Volume 14: 1922, Human Nature and Conduct. Edited by Ann Boydston, Jo. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John 1987. The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953, Volume 10: 1934, Art as Experience. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Bentley, Arthur. 1949. Knowing and the Known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
DeWinter-Schmitt, Rebecca. 2013. ‘Montreux Five Years On: A Analysis of State Efforts to Implement Montreux Document Legal Obligations and Good Practices’. Washington College of Law and NOVACT, Washington, DC. www.wcl.american.edu/index.cfm?LinkServID=B1E626D9-095E-4A28-94A94551CEA3488E.Google Scholar
Dittmer, Jason. 2017. Diplomatic Material: Affect, Assemblage, and Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise. 2007. ‘Private Military Companies under International Humanitarian Law’. In From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies, edited by Chesterman, Simon and Lehnardt, Sophia, pp. 115–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, Nicole. 2003. ‘Introduction: The Concept of Norm’. In A Sociocognitive Approach to Social Norms, edited by Dubois, Nicole, 1–16. London:
Routledge.Google Scholar
Dubois, Nicole 1994. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Elliott, Anthony. 2014. Routledge Handbook of Social and Cultural Theory. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elsea, Jennifer K., Schwartz, Moshe, and Nakamura, Kennon H.. 2008. Private Security Contractors in Iraq: Background, Legal Status, and Other Issues. Washington, DC.: Congressional Research Service. www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL32419.html.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989a. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 1989b. ‘Social Norms and Economic Theory’. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 99–117.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 2008. Reason and Rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. ‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’. American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Mische, Ann. 1998. ‘What Is Agency?’ American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023.Google Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte 2013. ‘Norms’. In Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, edited by Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, pp. 165–78. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evers, Miles. 2017. ‘On Transgression’. International Studies Quarterly 61(4): 786–94.Google Scholar
Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. 2002. ‘Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View’. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 52–72. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996a. ‘Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention’. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., pp. 153–85. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 1996b. ‘Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism’. International Organization 50(2): 325–47.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52(4): 887–917.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 1996. ‘The Evolution of International Norms’. International Studies Quarterly 40(3): 363–89. doi:10.2307/2600716.Google Scholar
‘FM 31-15 Operations against Irregular Forces’. 1961. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army. https://wikispooks.com/w/images/6/62/FM_31-15.pdf.Google Scholar
Foot, R. 2006. ‘Torture: The Struggle over a Peremptory Norm in a Counter-Terrorist Era’. International Relations 20(2): 131–51. doi:10.1177/0047117806063844.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Edited by Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence. 2000. Kennedy’s Wars: Berlin, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2009. ‘On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology’. International Organization 63(Fall): 701–31.Fuller, Christopher J. 2015. ‘The Eagle Comes Home to Roost: The Historical Origins of the CIA’s Lethal Drone Program’. Intelligence and National Security 30(6): 769–92. doi:10.1080/02684527.2014.895569.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich 2017. See It/Shoot It: The Secret History of the CIA’s Lethal Drone Program. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
GAO. 2005. ‘Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers’. Washington, DC. www.gao.gov/products/gao-05-737.Google Scholar
GAO 2008. ‘DOD and State Department Have Improved Oversight and Coordination of Private Security Contractors in Iraq, but Further Actions Are Needed to Sustain Improvements’. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office (GAO-08-966). www.gao.gov/new.items/d08966.pdf.Google Scholar
GAO 2013. ‘Afghanistan: Key Oversight Issues’. Washington, DC. www.gao.gov/assets/660/652075.pdf.Google Scholar
GAO 2016. ‘Observations on the Use of Force Management Levels in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria’. Washington, DC. www.gao.gov/assets/690/681336.pdf.Google Scholar
Gazit, Nir, and Brym, Robert J.. 2011. ‘State-Directed Political Assassination in Israel: A Political Hypothesis’. International Sociology 26(6): 862–77.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, James F. 2005. The Road to Abu Ghraib: US Army Detainee Doctrine and Experience. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press.Google Scholar
‘Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention)’. 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Go, Julian. 2008. ‘Global Fields and Imperial Forms: Field Theory and the British and American Empires’. Sociological Theory 26(3): 201–29.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2006. ‘Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy’. International Organization 60(1): 35–68.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009. ‘Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics’. International Theory 1(2): 249–81.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E., and Krebs, Ronald R.. 2015. ‘Rhetoric, Legitimation, and Grand Strategy’. Security Studies 24(1): 5–36.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1969. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1983. ‘The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address’. American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Gordon, Avishag. 2006. ‘“Purity of Arms,” “Preemptive War,” and “Selective Targeting” in the Context of Terrorism: General, Conceptual, and Legal Analyses’. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(5): 493–508. doi: 10.1080/10576100600698501.Google Scholar
Gorski, Philip S. 2013. Bourdieu and Historical Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gowans, Chris. 2015. ‘Moral Relativism’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/archives/win2015/entries/moral-relativism/.Google Scholar
Gregory, Derek. 2011. ‘From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War’. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 188–215.Google Scholar
Großklaus, Mathias. 2017. ‘Friction, Not Erosion: Assassination Norms at the Fault Line between Sovereignty and Liberal Values’. Contemporary Security Policy 38(2): 260–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1335135.Google Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2009. ‘A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms’. American Sociological Review 74(3): 358–79. doi:10.1177/000312240907400302.Google Scholar
Gross, Neil 2010. ‘Charles Tilly and American Pragmatism’. American Sociologist 41(4): 337–57.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Xavier, and Huysmans, Jef. 2013. Citizenship and Security: The Constitution of Political Being. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2011. ‘Securitization as a Causal Mechanism’. Security Dialogue 42(4–5): 329–41.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2009. ‘Network Analysis for International Relations’. International Organization 63(3): 559–92. doi:10.1017/S0020818309090195.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton H., and Clapp, Priscilla A.. 2006. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, Bill, ed. 2015. Rebuttal: The CIA Responds to the Senate Intelligence Committee’s Study of Its Detention and Interrogation Program. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther. 2009. ‘Beliefs as Rules for Action: Pragmatism as a Theory of Thought and Action’. International Studies Review 11: 638–62. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Beliefs+as+Rules+for+Action+:+Pragmatism+as+a+Theory+of+Thought+and+Action#0.Google Scholar
Hofferberth, Matthias, and Weber, Christian. 2015. ‘Lost in Translation: A Critique of Constructivist Norm Research’. Journal of International Relations and Development 18(1): 75–103. doi:10.1057/jird.2014.1.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2009. ‘Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?’ International Studies Review 11(2): 231–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00847.x.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2010. ‘Norms and Social Constructivism in International Relations’. International Studies Encyclopedia. Blackwell Reference Online. www.isacompendium.com/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781444336597_yr2013_chunk_g978144433659714_ss1-8.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Caroline. 2013. ‘Undoing War: War Ontologies and the Materiality of Drone Warfare’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43(3):535–52.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1998. ‘Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today’. Political Theory 26(6): 763–83.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2010. ‘The Logic of Habit in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 539–61. doi:10.1177/1354066110363502.Google Scholar
Horne, Alistair. 2012. A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954–1962. Basingstoke, UK: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
‘Human Resource Exploitation Training Manual’. 1983. Langley, DC: CIA. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/CIA%Human%Res%Exploit%A1-G11.pdf.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Jacobs, Alan M.. 2015. ‘Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach’. American Political Science Review 109(4): 653–73.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2017. ‘Targeted Killing in International Relations Theory: Recursive Politics of Technology, Law, and Practice’. Contemporary Security Policy 38(2): 307–19.Google Scholar
Imseis, Ardi. 2001. ‘Moderate Torture on Trial: Critical Reflections on the Israeli Supreme Court Judgement Concerning the Legality of General Security Service Interrogation Methods’. Berkeley Journal of International Law 19: 328.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, Naeem, and Blaney, David L. 2012. ‘The Dark Heart of Kindness: The Social Construction of Deflection’. International Studies Perspectives 13(2): 164–75.Google Scholar
Isenberg, David. 2007. ‘A Government in Search of Cover: Private Military Companies in Iraq’. In From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies, edited by Chesterman, Simon and Lehnardt, Chia, pp. 82–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2004. ‘Hegel’s House, or “People Are States Too”’. Review of International Studies 30: 281–7. doi:10.1017/S0260210504006072.Google Scholar
Isenberg, David 2006. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Isenberg, David 2012. “The Constructivism That Wasn’t.” Blog post. Duck of Minerva. www.duckofminerva.com/2012/04/constructivism-that-wasnt.html.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999. ‘Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics’. European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291–332.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1993. Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans, and Beckert, Jens. 2001. ‘Action Theory’. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Turner, Jonathan H., pp. 269–86. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Johnston, Patrick B. 2012. ‘Does Decapitation Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Targeting in Counterinsurgency Campaigns’. International Security 36(4): 47–79.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard Wyn. 1999. Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jenna. 2009. ‘When Heads Roll: Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Decapitation’. Security Studies 18(4): 719–55.Google Scholar
Jose, Betcy. 2017a. ‘Bin Laden’s Targeted Killing and Emerging Norms’. Critical Studies on Terrorism 10(1): 44–66.Google Scholar
Jose, Betcy 2017b. ‘Not Completely the New Normal: How Human Rights Watch Tried to Suppress the Targeted Killing Norm’. Contemporary Security Policy 38(2): 237–59.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Miller, Dale T.. 1986. ‘Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives’. Psychological Review 93(2): 136.Google Scholar
Kalberg, Stephen. 1980. ‘Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History’. American Journal of Sociology 85(5): 1145–79.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 1999. Old and New Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kasher, Asa, and Yadlin, Amos. 2005. ‘Assassination and Preventive Killing’. SAIS Review of International Affairs 25(1): 41–57. doi: 10.1353/sais.2005.0011.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J, ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New Directions in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Sean. 2012. ‘Ontological Security and Peace-Building in Northern Ireland’. Contemporary Security Policy 33(2): 236–63.Google Scholar
Keck, Margeret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Werner, Wouter. 2008. ‘Extrajudicial Killing as Risk Management’. Security Dialogue 39(2–3): 289–308.Google Scholar
Kilcullen, David, and Exum, Andrew McDonald. 2009. ‘Death from Above, Outrage Down Below’. New York Times, May 16. www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/opinion/17exum.html.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. ‘Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security’. Political Psychology 25(5): 741–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina 2006. Globalization and Religious Nationalism in India. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kinsey, Christopher. 2006. Corperate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie. ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa’. International Organization 49, no. 3 (1995): 451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033348.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus. 2007. ‘Argumentation and Compromise: Ireland’s Selection of the Territorial Status Quo Norm’. International Organization 61(1): 69–98. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070026.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus 2019. ‘Framing, Resonance and War: Foregrounds and Backgrounds of Cultural Congruence’. European Journal of International Relations 25(1): 61–85.Google Scholar
Krahmann, Elke. 2013. ‘The United States, PMSCs and the State Monopoly on Violence: Leading the Way towards Norm Change’. Security Dialogue 44(1): 53–71.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1986. ‘A State of the Art on an Art of the State’. International Organization 40(4): 753–75.Google Scholar
Krause, Keith. 1998. ‘Critical Theory and Security Studies: The Research Programme of Critical Security Studies’. Cooperation and Conflict 33(3): 298–333.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald. R., and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2007. ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’. European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 35–66. doi:10.1177/1354066107074284.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David. 2005. ‘Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence?’ European Journal of International Law 16(2): 171–212. doi:10.1093/ejil/chi114.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Armin. 2009. Killer Robots: Legality and Ethicality of Autonomous Weapons. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Krolikowski, Alanna. 2008. ‘State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Sceptical View’. Chinese Journal of International Politics 2(1): 109–33.Google Scholar
Krook, M. L., and True, J.. 2012. ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 103–27. doi:10.1177/1354066110380963.Google Scholar
Kruck, Andreas. 2013. ‘Theorising the Use of Private Military and Security Companies: A Synthetic Perspective’. Journal of International Relations and Development 17(1): 112–41. doi:10.1057/jird.2013.4.Google Scholar
‘KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation’. 1963. Langley, DC: CIA. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/Kubark 82-104.pdf.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1163/156913308X336453.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1996. ‘Culture and Preferences in the International Culture Cooperation’. American Political Science Review 90(1): 118–37.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel J. 2012. Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel J. 2013. ‘Why Hans Morgenthau Was Not a Critical Theorist (and Why Contemporary IR Realists Should Care)’. International Relations 27(1): 95–118.Google Scholar
Liivoja, Rain. 2015. ‘Technological Change and the Evolution of the Law of War’. International Review of the Red Cross 97(900): 1157–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383116000424.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 2011. The Problem of Harm in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lovewine, George C. 2012. Outsourcing the Global War on Terrorism: Private Military Companies and American Intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. 1971. ‘Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat’. In History & Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Talgarth: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2017. ‘A Material Turn in International Relations: The 4x4, Intervention and Resistance’. Review of International Studies 43(5): 855–74.Google Scholar
MacKay, Joseph, and Levin, Jamie. 2015. ‘Hanging Out in International Politics: Two Kinds of Explanatory Political Ethnography for IR’. International Studies Review 17(2): 163–88.Google Scholar
MacKay, Joseph, Levin, Jamie, de Carvalho, Gustavo, Cavoukian, Kristin, and Cuthbert, Ross. 2014. ‘Before and after Borders: The Nomadic Challenge to Sovereign Territoriality’. International Politics 51(1): 101–23.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2009. ‘Gendering Religion and Politics: Untangling Modernities’. In Gendering Religion and Politics, edited by Herzog, Hanna and Braude, Ann, 193–215. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. doi:10.1057/9780230623378_9.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Vol. II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. ‘Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’. International Organization 52(4): 943–69.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. 1999. ‘Pierre Bourdieu: Habitus and the Logic of Practice’. In Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, edited by Shusterman, Richard, 64–83. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Massey, Garth. 2011. Ways of Social Change: Making Sense of Modern Times. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention: Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2016. ‘Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism’. International Studies Quarterly 60(3): 475–85.Google Scholar
McFate, Sean. 2014. The Modern Mercenary: Private Armies and What They Mean for World Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, Ryder. 2009. ‘Norm Regress: US Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm’. International Relations 23(1): 5–25. doi:10.1177/0047117808100607.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils. 2008. Targeted Killing in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mérand, Frédéric, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2013. ‘Bourdieu’s Concepts’. In Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, edited by Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, pp. 24–44. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jane. 2009. ‘The Predator War’. New York Times, October 26. www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/10/26/091026fa_fact_mayer.Google Scholar
Miles, Anne Daugherty. 2016. ‘Perspectives on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques’. Washington, DC. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R43906.pdf.Google Scholar
Miller, Greg. 2012. ‘Plan for Hunting Terrorists Signals U.S. Intends to Keep Adding Names to Kill Lists’. Washington Post, 23 October.Google Scholar
Miller, Greg, Tate, Julie, and Gellman, Barton. 2013. ‘Documents Reveal NSA’s Extensive Involvement in Targeted Killing Program’. Washington Post, October 26. www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/documents-reveal-nsas-extensive-involvement-in-targeted-killing-program/2013/10/16/29775278-3674-11e3-8a0e-4e2cf80831fc_story.html.Google Scholar
Miller, Stuart Creighton. 1982. ‘Benevolent Assimilation’: The American Conquest of the Philippines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006a. ‘Anchoring Europe’s Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities and Ontological Security’. Journal of European Public Policy 13(March): 270–85. doi:10.1080/13501760500451709.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer 2006b. ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’. European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341–70. doi:10.1177/1354066106067346.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer, and Schweller, Randall L.. 2011. ‘Knowing the Unknown Unknowns: Misplaced Certainty and the Onset of War’. Security Studies 20(1): 2–35.Google Scholar
‘The Montreaux Document: On Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies during Armed Conflict’. 2008. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0996.pdf.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2014. Order within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moughty, Sarah. 2015. ‘John Rizzo: The Legal Case for “Enhanced Interrogation”’. PBS Frontline, 19 May. www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/john-rizzo-the-legal-case-for-enhanced-interrogation/.Google Scholar
Musah, Abdel-Fatau, Fayemi, Kayode, and Fayemi, J’Kayode. 2000. Mercenaries: An African Security Dilemma. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2018. ‘Defending Hierarchy from the Moon to the Indian Ocean: Symbolic Capital and Political Dominance in Early Modern China and the Cold War’. International Organization 72(3): 591–626.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. ‘Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’. International Organization 44(4): 479–526.Google Scholar
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. 2004a. ‘Intelligence Policy: Staff Statement No. 7’. Washington, DC. doi:10.1080/02684529008432037.Google Scholar
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States 2004b. ‘The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States’. Washington, DC. Available at https://books.google.ca/books?id=juJxMFmJCEMC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H., and Neumann, Iver B.. 2018. ‘Hegemonic-Order Theory: A Field-Theoretic Account’. European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 662–86. doi: 10.1177/1354066117716524.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H., and Pouliot, Vincent. 2013. ‘“Things of Networks”: Situating ANT in International Relations’. International Political Sociology 7(3): 342–5. doi:10.1111/ips.12026_4.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Kevin A. 2007. ‘What Should and What Should Not Be Regulated?’ In From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies, edited by Chesterman, Simon and Lehnardt, Chia, pp. 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl‐Dieter. 1982. ‘The Evolutionary Emergence of Norms’. British Journal of Social Psychology 21(2): 139–49.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne. 1999. ‘Muscular Humanitarianism: Reading the Narratives of the New Interventionism’. European Journal of International Law 10(4): 679–711.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Carlos. 2007. ‘The Private Military Company: An Entity at the Center of Overlapping Spheres of Commercial Activity and Responsibility’. In Private Military and Security Companies: Chances, Problems, Pitfalls and Prospects, edited by Jäger, Thomas and Gerhard, Kümmel, pp. 11–22. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Panke, Diana, and Petersohn, Ulrich. 2011. ‘Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes’. European Journal of International Relations 18(4): 719–42. doi:10.1177/1354066111407690.Google Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 2001. ‘Persuasion, Frames, and Norm Construction’. European Journal of International Relations 7(1): 37–61.Google Scholar
Percy, Sarah. 2007a. ‘Mercenaries: Strong Norm, Weak Law’. International Organization 61: 367–97.Google Scholar
Percy, Sarah 2007b. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Petersohn, Ulrich. 2011. ‘The Other Side of the COIN: Private Security Companies and Counterinsurgency Operations’. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 34(10): 782–801. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2011.604832.Google Scholar
Percy, Sarah 2014. ‘Reframing the Anti-Mercenary Norm: Private Military and Security Companies and Mercenarism’. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 69(4): 475–93.Google Scholar
Petraeus, David. 2007. ‘Address from Headquarters, 10 May 2007’. Baghdad: Multi-National Force – Iraq. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/petraeus_values_051007.pdf.Google Scholar
Pickard, Daniel B. 2001. ‘Legalizing Assassination-Terrorism, the Central Intelligence Agency, and International Law’. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 30: 1.Google Scholar
Plaw, Avery. 2006. Targeting Terrorists: A License to Kill? Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. 1993. ‘Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power’. International Security 18(2): 80–124.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2007. ‘“Sobjectivism”: Toward a Constructivist Methodology’. International Studies Quarterly 51: 359–84.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent 2008. ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’. International Organization 62(2): 257–88.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent 2010. International Security in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent 2016. International Pecking Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Christopher, and François, Dépelteau. 2013. ‘Introduction’. In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137342652.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel. 2013. ‘“Anyone Who Hurts Us”: How the Logic of Israel’s “Assassination Policy” Developed During the Aqsa Intifada’. Terrorism and Political Violence 25(2): 224–45. doi:10.1080/09546553.2012.657280.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel 2015. ‘Crossing off Names: The Logic of Military Assassination’. Small Wars & Insurgencies 26(1): 3–24. doi:10.1080/09592318.2014.959769.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel 2016. ‘Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory’. International Studies Review 18(3): 508–27.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon Frankel 2017. ‘A Relational View of Ontological Security in International Relations’. International Studies Quarterly 61(1): 78–85.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 1995. ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’. International Organization 49(1): 73–103.Google Scholar
Price, Richard 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard 2008. ‘Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics’. International Organization 62(2): 191–220.Google Scholar
‘Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), June 1977’. 1977. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).Google Scholar
Pugliese, Joseph. 2013. State Violence and the Execution of Law: Biopolitical Caesurae of Torture, Black Sites, Drones. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ragazzi, Franceso. 2009. ‘Governing Diasporas’. International Political Sociology 3(4): 378–97.Google Scholar
Razack, Sherene. 2008. Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Reichertz, Jo. 2007. ‘Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory’. In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K., pp. 214–18. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rejali, Darius M. 2007. Torture and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1996. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘“Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics’. International Organization 54(1): 1–39. doi:10.1162/002081800551109.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas 2006. ‘Transnational Governance and Legitimacy’. In Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences, edited by Benz, Arthur and Papadopoulos, Yannis, pp. 179–99. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Jose A. 2014. ‘Today’s CIA Critics Once Urged the Agency to Do Anything to Fight al-Qaeda’. Washington Post, 5 December. www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/todays-cia-critics-once-urged-the-agency-to-do-anything-to-fight-al-qaeda/2014/12/05/ac418da2-7bda-11e4-84d4-7c896b90abdc_story.html.Google Scholar
‘Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’. 1998. UN General Assembly.Google Scholar
Rosenau, William, and Long, Austin. 2009. ‘The Phoenix Program and Contemporary Counterinsurgency’. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP258.html.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Carol. 2020. ‘He Waterboarded a Detainee. Then He Had to Get the C.I.A. to Let Him Stop’. New York Times, 22 January. www.nytimes.com/2020/01/22/us/politics/cia-torture-interrogation-guantanamo.html.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1975. ‘International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends’. International Organization 29(3): 557–83.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard 1998. ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’. International Organization 52(4): 855–85.Google Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar. 2015. ‘Identity and Desecuritisation: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security’. Journal of International Relations and Development 18(1): 52–74.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2008. ‘Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder’. European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 101–31. doi:10.1177/1354066107087766.Google Scholar
SASC (Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate). 2010. ‘Inquiry into the Role and Oversight of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan’. https://fas.org/irp/congress/2010_rpt/sasc-psc.pdf.Google Scholar
Scahill, Jeremy. 2007. Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and Eike, von Savingy, eds. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge. doi:10.1016/S0956-5221(03)00029-0.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’. International Organization 55(1): 47–80.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Sebastian. 2014. ‘Foreign Military Presence and the Changing Practice of Sovereignty: A Pragmatist Explanation of Norm Change’. American Political Science Review 108(4): 817–29.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N. 1992. ‘State-Sponsored Assassination in International and Domestic Law’. Yale Journal of International Law 17: 609.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shain, Yossi, and Barth, Aharon. 2003. ‘Diasporas and International Relations Theory’. International Organization 57(3): 449–79. doi:10.1017/S0020818303573015.Google Scholar
Shannon, Vaughn P. 2000. ‘Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation’. International Studies Quarterly 44(2): 293–316.Google Scholar
Shaw, Ian G. R. 2013. ‘Predator Empire: The Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare’. Geopolitics 18(3): 536–59.Google Scholar
Shlomo, Avineri. 1981. The Making of Modern Zionism: Intellectual Origins of the Jewish State. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, David P. 2008. ‘Unveiling Charlie: U.S. Interrogators’ Creative Successes against Insurgents’. In Interrogation: World War II, Vietnam, and Iraq, pp. 77–146. Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College.Google Scholar
SIGIR. 2009. ‘Field Commanders See Improvements in Controlling and Coordinating Private Security Contractor Missions in Iraq.’ Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter Warren. 2008. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Updated edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Soldz, Stephen. 2011. ‘Fighting Torture and Psychologist Complicity’. Peace Review 23(1): 12–20. doi:10.1080/10402659.2011.548240.Google Scholar
Solis, Gary D. 2010. The Law of Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty. 2013. ‘Attachment, Tautology, and Ontological Security’. Critical Studies on Security 1(1): 130–2.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty. 2014. ‘The Affective Underpinnings of Soft Power’. European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 720–41.Google Scholar
Spracher, William, ed. 2008. Interrogation: World War II, Vietnam, and Iraq. Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College Press.Google Scholar
SSCI. 2014. ‘Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program, Findings and Conclusions’. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2005. ‘Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality and the American Civil War’. Review of International Studies 31: 519–40. doi:10.1017/S0260210505006613.Google Scholar
SSCI 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. Oxford: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203018200.Google Scholar
SSCI 2017. ‘Organizational Processes and Ontological (in)Security: Torture, the CIA and the United States’. Cooperation and Conflict 52(1): 69–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653156.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 2013. ‘Toward Socioanalysis: The “Traumatic Kernel” of Psychoanalysis and Neo-Bourdieusian Theory’. In Bourdieu and Historical Analysis, edited by Gorski, Philip S., pp. 108–30. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven. 2008. ‘Historical Institutionalism’. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, edited by Porta, Donatella Della and Keating, Michael, pp. 118–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena. 2015. ‘Narrative, Ontological Security, and Foreign Policy Change’. Foreign Policy Analysis 12(4): 610–27. doi:10.1111/fpa.12089.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena, and Zarakol, Ayse. 2013. ‘Cultural Intimacy in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 19(4): 915–38.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 1999. ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use’. International Organization 53(3): 433–68. doi:10.1162/002081899550959.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945. Vol. 87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. 2010. ‘The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice’. Comparative Political Studies 43(2): 230–59. doi:10.1177/0010414009350044.Google Scholar
Tenet, George. 2007. At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Tenet, George, Goss, Porter, McLaughlin, John, Calland, Albert, and Kappes, Stephen. 2014. ‘Ex-CIA Directors: Interrogations Saved Lives’. Wall Street Journal, 10 December. www.wsj.com/articles/cia-interrogations-saved-lives-1418142644.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Steinmo, Sven. 1992. ‘Historic Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’. In Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longsreth, Frank, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Gary. 2010. ‘Doing Case Study: Abduction Not Induction, Phronesis Not Theory’. Qualitative Inquiry 16(7): 575–82.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ward. 2000. ‘The Case of International Assassination’. International Security 25(1): 105–33.Google Scholar
Thomson, Janice E. 1994. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extra-Territorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1999. ‘The Trouble with Stories’. In The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century, edited by Pescosolido, Bernice and Aminzade, Ronald, 256–70. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan, and Tavory, Iddo. 2012. ‘Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis’. Sociological Theory 30(3): 167–86.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2012. ‘Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion “from Below”’. International Organization 66(2): 179–209.Google Scholar
United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2014. ‘The Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program’. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’. 1948. UN General Assembly.Google Scholar
Van Munster, Rens. 2007. ‘Review Essay: Security on a Shoestring: A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Critical Schools of Security in Europe’. Cooperation and Conflict 42(2): 235–43.Google Scholar
Von Wright, Georg Henrik 1971. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wahlbeck, Osten. 2002. ‘The Concept of Diaspora as an Analytical Tool in the Study of Refugee Communities’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28(2): 221–38. doi:10.1080/1369183022012430.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeremy, and Cooper, Melinda. 2011. ‘Genealogies of Resilience from Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation’. Security Dialogue 42(2): 143–60.Google Scholar
Walldorf, C. William. 2010. ‘Argument, Institutional Process, and Human Rights Sanctions in Democratic Foreign Policy’. European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 639–62. doi:10.1177/1354066109344015.Google Scholar
Weber, Martin. 2014. ‘Between “Isses” and “Oughts”: IR Constructivism, Critical Theory, and the Challenge of Political Philosophy’. European Journal of International Relations 20(2): 516–43.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1997. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edited by Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Harry A.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’. International Organization 41(3): 335–70.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whittle, Richard. 2014. Predator: The Secret Origins of the Drone Revolution. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley W., Blyth, Mark, and Seabrooke, Leonard. 2007. ‘Exogenous Shocks or Endogenous Constructions? The Meanings of Wars and Crises’. International Studies Quarterly 51(4): 747–59.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley W., and Park, Susan. ‘Differences beyond Theory: Structural, Strategic, and Sentimental Approaches to Normative Change’. International Studies Perspectives 13(3): 123–34.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje. 2004. ‘Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics’. European Journal of International Relations 10(2): 189–234. doi:10.1177/1354066104042934.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2007. ‘The Dual Quality of Norms and Governance beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to “Interaction”’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10(1): 47–69.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2009. ‘Enacting Meaning-in-use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations’. Review of International Studies 35(1): 175–93.Google Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2006. Agents, Structures, and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Lauren. 2017. ‘Embodying Algorithmic War: Gender, Race, and the Posthuman in Drone Warfare’. Security Dialogue 48(1): 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616657947.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. 3rd edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Winston, Carla. 2018. ‘Norm Structure, Diffusion, and Evolution: A Conceptual Approach’. European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 638–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117720794.Google Scholar
Yoo, John. 2014. ‘Yoo: The Feinstein Report Cannot Deny a Clear Record of Success’. Time Magazine, 9 December. https://time.com/3626957/yoo-senate-torture-report-feinstein/.Google Scholar
Youngs, Gillian. 2006. ‘Feminist International Relations in the Age of the War on Terror: Ideologies, Religions and Conflict’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 8(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Zanotti, Laura. 2014. ‘Questioning Universalism, Devising an Ethics without Foundations: An Exploration of International Relations Ontologies and Epistemologies’. Journal of International Political Theory 11(3): 277–95. doi:10.1177/1755088214555044.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2010. ‘Ontological (In)Security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan’. International Relations 24(1): 3–23. doi:10.1177/0047117809359040.Google Scholar
Zarate, Juan Carlos. 1998. ‘The Emergence of a New Dog of War: Private International Security Companies, International Law, and the New World Disorder’. Stanford Journal of International Law 34: 75–162.Google Scholar
Zellman, Ariel. 2015. ‘Framing Consensus: Evaluating the Narrative Specificity of Territorial Indivisibility’. Journal of Peace Research 52(4): 492–507.Google Scholar
Zengel, Patricia. 1991. ‘Assassination and the Law of Armed Conflict’. Military Law Review 134: 123–65.Google Scholar
Zengel, Patricia 1992. ‘Assassination and the Law of Armed Conflict’. Mercer Law Review 43(2): 615–44.Google Scholar
Zenko, Micah. 2012. ‘The Seven Deadly Sins of John Brennan’. Foreign Policy, 19 September.Google Scholar
Zengel, Patricia 2013. Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies – Council of Foreign Relations, Special Report No. 65. Washington, DC: Council of Foreign Relations.Google Scholar