Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:49:59.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Constantine Antonopoulos
Constantine Antonopoulos
Affiliation:
Democritus University of Thrace
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Non-Participation in Armed Conflict
Continuity and Modern Challenges to the Law of Neutrality
 , pp. 247 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abi-Saab, G., ‘Wars of National Liberation and the Geneva Conventions and Protocols’ (1979 IV) 165 Recueil de Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 357–445Google Scholar
Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Azaria, D., Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D. (ed.), The Kuwait Crisis: Sanctions and Their Economic Consequences (Cambridge: Grotius Publications, 1991), part 2Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D., ‘Self-Defence against an Imminent or Actual Armed Attack by Non-state Actors’ (2012) 106 American Journal of International Law, 770–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boczek, B. A., ‘Law of Warfare at Sea and Neutrality: Lessons from the Gulf War’ (1989) 20 Ocean Development and International Law, 239–71Google Scholar
Borchard, E., ‘War, Neutrality and Non-belligerency’ (1941) 35 American Journal of International Law, 618–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchard, E., ‘Was Norway Delinquent in the Case of the Altmark?’ (1940) 34 American Journal of International Law, 289–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, M., ‘The Law of Neutrality’, in Fleck, D. (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 549–80Google Scholar
Bothe, M., ‘Neutrality at Sea’, in Dekker, I. F. and Post, H. H. G. (eds.), The Gulf War of 1980–1988 (Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1992), pp. 205–11Google Scholar
Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Boyle, F., ‘International Crisis and Neutrality: United States Foreign Policy toward the Iran–Iraq War’ (1992) 43 Mercer Law Review, 523–62Google Scholar
Bridgeman, T., ‘The Law of Neutrality and the Conflict with Al-Qaeda’ (2010) 85 New York University Law Review, 1186–224Google Scholar
Brierly, J. L., ‘International Law and Resort to Armed Force’ (1932) 4 Cambridge Law Journal, 308–19Google Scholar
Brown, D., ‘A Proposal for an International Convention to Regulate the Use of Information Systems in Armed Conflict’ (2006) 47 Harvard International Law Journal, 179–222Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law, 7th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., ‘Volunteers and the Law of War and Neutrality’ (1956) 5 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 570–80Google Scholar
Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, Crawford, J. (ed.), 9th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Brunée, J. and Toope, S. J., ‘Self-Defence against Non-state Actors: Are Powerful States Willing but Unable to Change International Law?’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 263–86Google Scholar
Cassese, A., ‘Current Challenges to International Humanitarian Law’, in Clapham, A. and Gaeta, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 4–19Google Scholar
Chadwick, E., Traditional Neutrality Revisited: Law, Theory and Case Studies (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002)Google Scholar
Christakis, T., ‘Challenging the “Unwilling or Unable Test”’ (2017) 77 Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 19–22Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘La rébellion et le droit international: le principe de neutralité en tension’ (2015) 374 Recueil de Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 57–309Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘The “Unwilling or Unable Test”: Has It Been, and Could It Be, Accepted?’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law, 777–800Google Scholar
Crawford, E. and Pert, A., International Humanitarian Law, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2020)Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Crawford, J., State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Dear, I. C. B. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Second World War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘“Unwilling or Unable”: Toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defense’ (2012) 52 Virginia Journal of International Law, 483–549Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., ‘Comments’ (1988) 82 American Society of International Law Proceedings, 606–09Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L., ‘The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government’ (1985) 56 British Yearbook of International Law, 189–252Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, L., ‘Private Military Companies under International Humanitarian Law’, in Chesterman, S. and Lehnardt, C. (eds.), From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 115–38Google Scholar
Drew, P., The Law of Maritime Blockade: Past, Present and Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Efrony, D. and Shany, Y., ‘A Rule Book on the Shelf? Tallinn Manual 2.0 on Cyberoperations and Subsequent State Practice’ (2018) 112 American Journal of International Law, 583–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, R., ‘The Cambodian Operation and International Law’ (1971) 65 American Journal of International Law, 1–25Google Scholar
Falk, R., ‘Introduction’, in Falk, R. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971), pp. 1–29Google Scholar
Farer, T., ‘The Regulation of Foreign Intervention in Civil Armed Conflict’ (1974 II) 142 Recueil de Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 297–407Google Scholar
Fenrick, W. J., ‘The Exclusion Zone Device in the Law of Naval Warfare’ (1986) 14 Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 91–126Google Scholar
Fenwick, C. G., ‘Is Neutrality Still a Term of Present Law?’ (1969) 63 American Journal of International Law, 98–102Google Scholar
Ferro, L. and Ruys, T., ‘The Saudi-Led Military Intervention in Yemen’s Civil War’, in Ruys, T., Corten, O. and Hofer, A. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 899–911Google Scholar
Ferro, L. and Verlinden, N., ‘Neutrality during Armed Conflicts: A Coherent Approach to Third-State Support for Warring Parties’ (2018) 17 Chinese Journal of International Law, 15–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, M. D., ‘Naval Blockade and the Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen’ (2017) 64 Netherlands International Law Review, 291–307Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G., ‘Some Aspects of Modern Contraband Control and the Law of Prize’ (1945) 22 British Yearbook of International Law, 73–95Google Scholar
Garner, J. W., ‘Questions of International Law in the Spanish Civil War’ (1937) 31 American Journal of International Law, 66–73Google Scholar
Gavouneli, M., ‘Neutrality - A Survivor?’ (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law, 267–273Google Scholar
Goia, A. and Ronzitti, N., ‘The Law of Neutrality: Third States Commercial Rights and Duties’, in Dekker, I. F. and Post, H. H. G. (eds.), The Gulf War of 1980–1988 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992), pp. 221–242Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The British Position in regard to the Gulf Conflict (Iran–Iraq) Part 2’ (1991) 37 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 464–73Google Scholar
Gray, C., ‘The British Position in regard to the Gulf Conflict’ (1988) 37 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 420–8Google Scholar
Green, L. C., The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, 2nd ed. (Manchester: Juris Publishing Manchester University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Greenwood, C., ‘The Concept of War in Modern International Law’ (1987) 36 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 283–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilfoyle, D., The Mavi Marmara Incident and Blockade in Armed Conflict (2011) 81 British Yearbook of International Law, 171–223Google Scholar
Heerten, L. and Dirk, Moses A., ‘The Nigeria-Biafra War: postcolonial conflict and the question of genocide’ (2014) 16 Journal of Genocide Research, 169–203Google Scholar
Heintschel von Heinegg, W., ‘Methods and Means on Naval Warfare in Non-International Armed Conflicts’ (2012) 88 International Law Studies, 211–36Google Scholar
Heintschel von Heinegg, W., ‘The Law of Armed Conflict at Sea’ in Fleck, D. (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 463–547Google Scholar
Heller, K. J., The Law of Neutrality Does Not Apply to the Conflict with Al-Quaeda and It’a Good Thing Too: A Response to Chang, Texas International Law Journal 47 (2011), pp. 115–142Google Scholar
Henckaerts, J.-M. and Doswald-Beck, L. (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), vol. ICrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, L., ‘Force, Intervention and Neutrality in Contemporary International Law’ (1963) 57 American Society of International Law Proceedings, 147–162Google Scholar
Hessbruegge, J. A., ‘The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 265–306Google Scholar
Hyde, C., International Law, Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United States, 2nd ed., 3 vols. (Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1945), vol. III.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. H., ‘Address of Robert H. Jackson, Attorney General of the United States, Inter-American Bar Association, Havana, Cuba, March 27, 1941’ (1941) 35 American Journal of International Law, 348–59Google Scholar
Jennings, R. and Watts, A. (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law, Peace, 9th ed. (London and New York: Longman, 1992), vol. IGoogle Scholar
Jessup, P., Neutrality. Its History, Economics and Law. Today and Tomorrow, 5 vols. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1936), vol. IVGoogle Scholar
Juneau, T., ‘Iran’s Policy Towards the Houthis in Yemen: a limited return on a modest investment’ (2016) 92 International Affairs, 647–63Google Scholar
Kalshoven, F., Reflections on the Laws of War (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 2007)Google Scholar
Kelsey, J. T. G., ‘Hacking into International Humanitarian Law: The Principles of Distinction and Neutrality in the Age of Cyber Warfare’ (2008) 106 Michigan Law Review, 1427–52Google Scholar
Kleffner, J. K., ‘Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law’, Fleck, D. (ed.) The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 43–78Google Scholar
Klein, N., Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komarnicki, T., ‘The Place of Neutrality in the Modern System of International Law’ (1952 I) 80 Recueil de Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 395–510Google Scholar
Kress, C., ‘Major Post-Westphalian Shifts and Some Important Neo-Westphalian Hesitations in the State Practice on the International Law on the Use of Force’ (2014) 1 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 11–54Google Scholar
Kunz, J., ‘Austria’s Permanent Neutrality’ (1956) 50 American Journal of International Law, 418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, J., ‘The Laws of War’ (1956) 50 American Journal of International Law, 313–337Google Scholar
Lalive, J. F., ‘International Organization and Neutrality’ (1947) 24 British Yearbook of International Law, 72–89Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, E. and others (eds.), The Kuwait Crisis – Basic Documents (Cambridge: Grotius Publications, 1991)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., ‘Memorandum on the Principles of International Law Governing the Question of Aid to the Allies by the United States, 15 January 1941’, Sir Lauterpacht, E. (ed.) International Law being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Disputes, War and Neutrality Parts IX–XIV, 5 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), vol. V, pp. 45–658Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., ‘Neutrality and Collective Security’ in Sir Lauterpacht, E. (ed.), International Law being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Disputes, War and Neutrality Parts IX–XIV, 5 vols.( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), vol. V, pp. 611–31Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., ‘The Future of Neutrality’, in Sir Lauterpacht, E. (ed.), International Law being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Disputes, War and Neutrality Parts IX–XIV, 5 vols.(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), vol. V, pp. 675–83Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., Recognition in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1947)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933)Google Scholar
Lin, H., ‘Cyber Conflict and International Humanitarian Law’ (2012) 94 (No. 886) International Review of the Red Cross, 515–31Google Scholar
Mayama, A., ‘The Influence of the Straits Transit Regime on the Law of Neutrality at Sea’ (1995) 26 Ocean Development and International Law, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoubrey, H. and White, N. D., International Law and Armed Conflict (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1992)Google Scholar
McDougal, M. and Feliciano, F., The International Law of War. Transnational Coercion and World Public Order (New Haven: New Haven Press – The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994)Google Scholar
McLaughlin, R., Recognition of Belligerency and the Law of Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
McNair, A., ‘The Legal Meaning of War and the Relation of War to Reprisals’ (1925) 11 Grotius Society Proceedings, 29–51Google Scholar
Neff, S., Justice in Blue and Gray. A Legal History of the Civil War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Neff, S., The Rights and Duties of Neutrals. A General History (Manchester: Juris Publishing Manchester University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Norton, P. M., ‘Between the Ideology and the Reality: The Shadow of the Law of Neutrality’ (1976) 17 Harvard International Law Journal, 249–311Google Scholar
O’Connell, D. P., ‘Limited War at Sea’ in Howard, M (ed.), Restraints on War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 123–34Google Scholar
Ogley, R., The Theory and Practice of Neutrality in the Twentieth Century (London: Routledge and Keegan Paul, 1970)Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L., International Law, A Treatise, Disputes War and Neutrality, Lauterpacht, H. (ed.), 7th ed., 2 vols. (New York: David McKay, 1952), vol. IIGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol. 1 Parts 2 to 4, Jennings, R. and Watts, A. (eds.), 9th ed. (London and New York: Longman, 1996)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A., Collective Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Padelford, N. J., ‘International Law and the Spanish Civil War’ (1937) 31 American Journal of International Law, 226–43Google Scholar
Papastavridis, E., The Interception of Vessels on the High Seas. Contemporary Challenges to the Legal Order of the Oceans (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Pearce Higgins, A., ‘Le Droit de Visite et Capture dans la Guerre Maritime’ (1926 I) 11 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 65–170Google Scholar
Pearce-Higgins, A., ‘Retaliation in Naval Warfare’ (1927) 8 British Yearbook of International Law, 129–146Google Scholar
Petrochilos, G., ‘The Relevance of the Concepts of War and Armed Conflict to the law of Neutrality’ (1998) 31 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 575–616Google Scholar
Politakis, G. P., Modern Aspects of the Laws of Naval Warfare and Maritime Neutrality (London, New York: Keegan Paul International, 1998)Google Scholar
Politis, N., Neutrality and Peace (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1935)Google Scholar
Ruys, T.,’Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter. Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Ruys, T., ‘Of Arms, Funding and Non-Lethal Assistance – Issues Surrounding Third-State Intervention in the Syrian Civil War’ (2014) 13 Chinese Journal of International Law, 13–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassòli, M., Bouvier, A. A., Quintin, A. (eds.), How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents and teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (Geneva: ICRC, 2011)Google Scholar
Schindler, D., ‘Aspects Contemporains de la Neutralité’ (1967 II) 121 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, pp. 225–313Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N. (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Introduction’, in Tsagourias, N. and Buchan, R. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2015), pp. 1–9Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. N., ‘Peacetime Cyber Responses and Wartime Cyber Operations: An Analytical Vade Mecum’ (2007) 8 Harvard National Security Journal, 239–80Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G., International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals, 2 vols. (London: Stevens, 1968), vol. IIGoogle Scholar
Séfériades, S., Course of Public International Law, International Disputes and Conflicts, 2 vols. (Athens, 1928–1929), vol. IIGoogle Scholar
Seger, P., ‘The Law of Neutrality’, in Clapham, A. and Gaeta, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 248–70Google Scholar
Sinclair, I., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, S., The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Thomas, A. V. W. and Thomas Jr., A. J., ‘International Legal Aspects of the Civil War in Spain 1936–1939’, in Falk, R. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971), pp. 111–178Google Scholar
Thucydides, Histories Book 5, chapter 89 (in Greek)Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N. and Farrell, M., ‘Cyber Attribution: Legal and Technical Approaches and Challenges’ (2020) 31 European Journal of International Law, 941–67Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N. and Morisson, A., International Humanitarian Law. Case, Materials and Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N. and White, N. D., Collective Security. Theory, Law and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N., ‘Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: The Interaction between Self-Defence as a Primary Rule and Self-Defence as a Secondary Rule’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law, 801–26Google Scholar
Tucker, R. W., The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea, International Law Series (Newport, Rhode Island: US Naval War College, 1955), vol. XLXGoogle Scholar
Turns, D., ‘Cyber War and the Law of Neutrality’, in Tsagourias, N. and Buchan, R. (eds.), International Law and Cyberspace (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015), pp. 380–400Google Scholar
Turns, D., ‘Military Manuals and the Customary Law of Armed Conflict’ in Hayashi, N. (ed.), National Military Manuals on the Law of Armed Conflict, 2nd ed. (Oslo: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2010), pp. 65–77Google Scholar
Uche, C., ‘Oil, British Interests and the Nigerian Civil War’ (2008) 49 Journal of African History, 111–135Google Scholar
Upcher, J., Neutrality in Contemporary International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Vagts, D., ‘Switzerland, International Law and World War II’ (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law, 466–75Google Scholar
Vagts, D., ‘The Traditional Legal Concept of Neutrality in a Changing Environment’ (1998) 14 American University International law Review, 83–102Google Scholar
Verzijl, J. H. W., International Law in Historical Perspective, 11 vols. (Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff, 1979), vol. XGoogle Scholar
Vöneky, S., ‘Implementation and Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, D. (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 645–700Google Scholar
Waldock, H., ‘The Release of the Altmark’s Prisoners’ (1947) 24 British Yearbook of International Law, 216–238Google Scholar
Wani, K., Neutrality in International Law. From the Sixteenth Century to 1945 (Abington-on-Thames: Routledge, 2017)Google Scholar
White, N. D., ‘From Covenant to Charter: A Legacy Squandered?’ (2020) 22 International Community Law Review, 310–30Google Scholar
White, N. D., Keeping the Peace. The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security, 2nd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Whiteman, M., Digest of International Law, 15 vols. (Washington, DC: Department of State Publication, 1968), vol. XGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, M., Digest of International Law, 15 vols. (Washington, DC: Department of State Publication, 1968), vol. XIGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. R., ‘“Non-Belligerency” in Relation to the Terminology of Neutrality’ (1941) 35 American Journal of International Law, 121–3Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘Self Defence Against Non-State Actors – A Practitioner’s View’ (2017) 77 Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 75–7Google Scholar
Wood, M., ‘The Caroline Incident-1837’, in Ruys, T., Corten, O. and Hofer, A. (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law. A Case-based Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 5–14Google Scholar
Wright, Q., ‘The American Civil War (1861–1865)’, in Falk, R. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971), pp. 30–109Google Scholar
Wright, Q., ‘The Lend-Lease Bill and International Law’ (1941) 35 American Journal of International Law, 305–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Q., ‘The Present Status of Neutrality’ (1940) 34 American Journal of International Law, 391–415Google Scholar
Wright, Q., ‘When Does War Exist?’ (1932) 26 American Journal of International Law, 362–8Google Scholar
Zhang, L., ‘A Chinese Perspective on cyber war’ (2012) 94 (No. 886) International Review of the Red Cross, 801–7Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×