Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Preface
- Historical Perspective
- Conference Participants
- Conference Photo
- Conference Timetable
- On flatness and the Ore condition
- Localization in general rings, a historical survey
- Noncommutative localization in homotopy theory
- Noncommutative localization in group rings
- A non-commutative generalisation of Thomason's localisation theorem
- Noncommutative localization in topology
- L2-Betti numbers, Isomorphism Conjectures and Noncommutative Localization
- Invariants of boundary link cobordism II. The Blanchfield-Duval form
- Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry
- Index
Noncommutative localization in group rings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Preface
- Historical Perspective
- Conference Participants
- Conference Photo
- Conference Timetable
- On flatness and the Ore condition
- Localization in general rings, a historical survey
- Noncommutative localization in homotopy theory
- Noncommutative localization in group rings
- A non-commutative generalisation of Thomason's localisation theorem
- Noncommutative localization in topology
- L2-Betti numbers, Isomorphism Conjectures and Noncommutative Localization
- Invariants of boundary link cobordism II. The Blanchfield-Duval form
- Noncommutative localization in noncommutative geometry
- Index
Summary
Abstract
This paper will briefly survey some recent methods of localization in group rings, which work in more general contexts than the classical Ore localization. In particular the Cohn localization using matrices will be described, but other methods will also be considered.
Introduction
Let R be a commutative ring and let S = {s ∈ R | sr ≠ 0 for all r ∈ R \ 0}, the set of non-zerodivisors of R. Then, in the same manner as one constructs ℚ from ℤ, we can form the quotient ring RS–1 which consists of elements of the form r/s with r ∈ R and s ∈ S, and in which r1/s1 = r2/s2 if and only if r1s2 = s1r2. We can consider R as a subring RS–1 by identifying r ∈ R with r/1 ∈ RS–1. Then RS–1 is a ring containing R with the property that every element is either a zerodivisor or invertible. Furthermore, every element of RS–1 can be written in the form rs–1 with r ∈ R and s ∈ S (though not uniquely so). In the case R is an integral domain, then RS–1 will be a field and will be generated as a field by R (i.e. if K is a subfield of RS–1 containing R, then K = RS–1). Moreover if K is another field containing R which is generated by R, then K is isomorphic to RS–1 and in fact there is a ring isomorphism RS–1 → K which is the identity on R.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Noncommutative Localization in Algebra and Topology , pp. 40 - 59Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
- 9
- Cited by