Abadias, L., Bollo, C., and Yakubovich, D., Operator inequalities, functional models and ergodicity, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 498(2) (2021), 124984, 39 pp.Google Scholar

Abbott, S., Understanding Analysis, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2015.Google Scholar

Agler, J., The Arveson extension theorem and coanalytic models, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 5(5) (1982), 608–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agler, J., Hypercontractions and subnormality, J. Operator Theory 13(2) (1985), 203–217.Google Scholar

J. Agler, On the representation of certain holomorphic functions defined on a polydisc, Topics in Operator Theory: Ernst D. Hellinger memorial volume (Eds. L. de Branges, I. Gohberg, and J. Rovnyak), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 48, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1990, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar

Agler, J. and McCarthy, J.E., Global holomorphic functions in several noncommuting variables, Canad. J. Math. 67(2) (2015), 241–285.Google Scholar

Agler, J. and McCarthy, J.E., Pick interpolation for free holomorphic functions, Amer. J. Math. 137(6) (2015), 1685–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agler, J. and McCarthy, J.E., Non-commutative functional calculus, J. Anal. Math. 137(1) (2019), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agler, J., McCarthy, J.E., and Young, N., Operator Analysis: Hilbert Space Methods in Complex Analysis, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 219, Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

J. Agler, and Stankus, M., m-isometric transformations of Hilbert space I, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 21(4) (1995), 383–429.Google Scholar

J. Agler, and Stankus, M., m-isometric transformations of Hilbert space II, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 23(1) (1995), 1–48.Google Scholar

J. Agler, and Stankus, M., m-isometric transformations of Hilbert space III, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 24(4) (1996), 379–421.Google Scholar

Aleman, A., Hartz, M., McCarthy, J.E., and Richter, S., Interpolation sequences in spaces with the complete Pick property, Int. Math. Res. Not. 12 (2019), 3832– 3854.Google Scholar

Aleman, A., Richter, S., and Sundberg, C., Beurling’s theorem for the Bergman space, Acta Math. 177(2) (1996), 275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpay, D., Pinhas, A., and Vinnikov, V., de Branges spaces on compact Riemann surfaces and a Beurling-Lax type theorem, Adv. Math. 373 (2020), Art. 107315, 66 pp.Google Scholar

Ambrozie, C.-G., Englis, M., and Müller, V., Operator tuples and analytic models over general domains in Cⁿ, J. Operator Theory 47(2) (2002), 287–302.Google Scholar

Anderson, B.D.O. and Vongpanitlerd, S., Network Analysis and Synthesis: A Modern Systems Theory Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.Google Scholar

Arazy, J. and Engliš, M., Analytic models for commuting operator tuples on bounded symmetric domains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355(2) (2003), 837–864.Google Scholar

Arveson, W., Subalgebras of C^∗ algebras III: multivariable operator theory, Acta Math. 181 (1998), 159–228.Google Scholar

Athavale, A., Model theory on the unit ball in C^m, J. Operator Theory 27 (1992), 347–358.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Linear systems, operator model theory and scattering: multivariable generalizations, Operator Theory and Its Applications (Eds. A.G. Ramm, P.N. Shivakumar, and A.V. Strauss), Fields Inst. Commun. 25, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000, pp. 151–178.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., Canonical transfer-function realization for Schur multipliers on the Drury-Arveson space and models for commuting row contractions, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 61(2) (2012), 665–716.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., Weighted Bergman spaces: shift-invariant subspaces and input/state/output linear systems, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 76(1) (2013), 301–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., Weighted Hardy spaces: shift invariant and coinvariant subspaces, linear systems and operator model theory, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 79 (2013), 623–686.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., A Beurling type theorem in weighted Bergman spaces, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 351(11–12) (2013), 433–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., On the expansive property of inner functions in weighted Hardy spaces, Complex Analysis and Dynamical Systems (Eds. M.L. Agranovsky et al.), Contemp. Math. 667, Israel Math. Conf. Proc., American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2016, pp. 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., Contractive multipliers from Hardy space to weighted Hardy space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145(6) (2017), 2411–2425.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., de Branges-Rovnyak spaces: basics and theory, Operator Theory, vol. 1 (Ed. D. Alpay), Springer, 2015, pp. 631–679.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Bolotnikov, V., Interpolation by contractive multipliers between Fock spaces, Complex Function Theory, Operator Theory, Schur Analysis and Systems Theory (Eds. D. Alpay, B. Fritzsche, and B. Kirstein), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 280, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2020, pp. 79–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A., Bolotnikov, V., and Fang, Q., Multivariable backward-shift-invariant subspaces and observability operators, Multidim. Syst. Signal Process. 18(4) (2007), 191–248.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Bolotnikov, V., and Fang, Q., Transfer function realization for multipliers of the Arveson space, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 333(1) (2007), 68–92.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Bolotnikov, V., and Fang, Q., Schur-class multipliers on the Arveson space: De Branges-Rovnyak reproducing kernel spaces and commutative transfer-function realizations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 341(1) (2008), 519–539.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Bolotnikov, V., and Fang, Q., Schur-class multipliers on the Fock space: de Branges-Rovnyak reproducing kernel spaces and transfer-function realizations, Operator Theory, Structured Matrices, and Dilations: Tiberiu Constantinescu Memorial Volume (Eds. M. Bakonyi, A. Gheondea, M. Putinar, and J. Rovnyak), Theta Ser. Adv. Math. 7, Theta, Bucharest, 2007, pp. 85–114.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Cohen, N., de Branges-Rovnyak operator models and system theory: a survey, Topics in Matrix and Operator Theory (Eds. H. Bart, I. Gohberg, and M.A. Kaashoek), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 50, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1991, pp. 93–136Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Groenewald, G., and Malakorn, T., Structured noncommutative multidimensional linear system, SIAM J. Control Optim. 44(4) (2005), 1474–1528.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Groenewald, G., and Malakorn, T., Conservative structured noncommutative multidimensional linear systems, The State Space Method: Generalizations and Applications (Eds. D. Alpay and I. Gohberg), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 161,Birkhäuser, Basel, 2006, pp. 179–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A., Groenewald, G., and Malakorn, T., Bounded real lemma for structured noncommutative multidimensional linear systems and robust control, Multidim. Syst. Signal Process. 17(2–3) (2006), 119–150.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Groenewald, G., and ter Horst, S., Bounded real lemma and structured singular value versus diagonal scaling: the free noncommutative setting, Multidim. Syst. Signal Process. 27(1) (2016), 217–254.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Groenewald, G., and ter Horst, S., Standard versus strict Bounded Real Lemma with infinite-dimensional state space I. The state-space-similarity approach, J. Operator Theory 80(1) (2018), 225–253.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Groenewald, G., and ter Horst, S., Standard versus strict Bounded Real Lemma with infinite-dimensional state space II. The storage function approach, The Diversity and Beauty of Applied Operator Theory (Eds. A. Böttcher, D. Potts, P. Stollmann, and D. Wenzel), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 268, Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Kriete, T.L., Operator-valued Nevanlinna-Pick kernels and the functional models for contraction operators, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 10(1) (1987), 17–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A., Marx, G., and Vinnikov, V., Noncommutative reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 271(7) (2016), 1844–1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A., Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi, D.S., Sadosky, C., and Vinnikov, V., Scattering systems with several evolutions and formal reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 9(4) (2015), 827–931.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A., Sadosky, C., and Vinnikov, V., Scattering systems with several evolutions and multidimensional input/state/output linear systems, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 52(3) (2005), 323–393.Google Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Vinnikov, V., Formal reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces: the commutative and noncommutative settings, Reproducing Kernel Spaces and Applications (Ed. D. Alpay), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 143, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2003, pp. 77–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J.A. and Vinnikov, V., Lax-Phillips scattering and conservative linear systems: a Cuntz-algebra multidimensional setting, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 178(837) (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrow, D. L., Chui, C. K., Smith, P. M. and Ward, J. D., Unicity of best mean approximation by second order splines with variable knots, Math. Comp. 32(144) (1978), 1131–1143.Google Scholar

Basseville, M., Benveniste, A., Chou, K.C., Golden, S.A., Nikoukhah, M., and Wilsky, A.S., Modeling and estimation of multiscale stochastic processes, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 38(2) (1992), 766–784.Google Scholar

J. Berstel, and Reutenauer, C., Noncommutative Rational Series with Applications. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 137, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.Google Scholar

Beurling, A., On two problems concerning linear transformations in Hilbert space, Acta Math. 81 (1948), 239–255.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, M., Eschmeier, J., Keshari, D.K., and Sarkar, J., Dilations, wandering subspaces, and inner functions, Linear Algebra Appl. 523 (2017), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhattacharjee, M., Das, B.K., and Sarkar, J., Hypercontractions and factorizations of multipliers in one and several variables, arXiv1812.081432v2, 2019.Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, T., Eschmeier, J., and Sarkar, J., Characteristic function of a pure commuting contractive tuple, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 53(1) (2005), 23–32.Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, T., Eschmeier, J., and Sarkar, J., On C.N.C. commuting contractive tuples, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 116(3) (2006), 299–316.Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, T. and Sarkar, J., Characteristic function for polynomially contractive commuting tuples, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 321(1) (2006), 242–259.Google Scholar

Blecher, D.P. and le Merdy, C., Operator Algebras and Their Modules: An Operator Space Approach, London Mathematical Society Monographs New Series 30, Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borichev, A. and Hedenmalm, H., Harmonic functions of maximal growth: invertibility and cyclicity in Bergman spaces, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 10(4) (1997), 761–796.Google Scholar

de Branges, L. and Rovnyak, J., Canonical models in quantum scattering theory, Perturbation Theory and Its Applications in Quantum Mechanics (Ed. C. Wilcox), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1966, pp. 295–392.Google Scholar

de Branges, L. and Rovnyak, J., Square Summable Power Series, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1966.Google Scholar

Bunce, J.W., Models for n-tuples of noncommuting operators, J. Funct. Anal. 57(1) (1984), 21–30.Google Scholar

F. Beatrous, and Burbea, J., Reproducing kernels and interpolation of holomorphic functions, Complex Analysis, Functional Analysis and Approximation Theory (Ed. J. Mujica), North-Holland Math. Stud. 125, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 25–46.Google Scholar

Chavan, S., Pradhan, D.K., and Trivedi, S., Multishifts on directed Cartesian products of rooted directed trees. Dissertationes Math. 527 (2017).Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Quasi-wandering subspaces in a class of reproducing analytic Hilbert spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140(1) (2012), 4235–4242.Google Scholar

Chou, K.C., Willsky, A.S., and Benveniste, A., Multiscale recursive estimation, data fusion, and reglarization, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 39(3) (1994), 464–478.Google Scholar

Clouâtre, R. and Hartz, M., Multiplier algebras of complete Nevanlinna-Pick spaces: dilations, boundary representations and hyperrigidity, J. Funct. Anal. 274(6) (2018), 1690–1738.Google Scholar

Clouâtre, R., Hartz, M., and Schillo, D., A Beurling-Lax-Halmos theorem for spaces with a complete Nevanlinna-Pick factor, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148(2) (2020), 731–740.Google Scholar

Curto, R.E. and Vasilescu, F.H., Standard operator models in the polydisk, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42(3) (1993), 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curto, R.E. and Vasilescu, F.H., Standard operator models in the polydisk II, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 44(3) (1995), 727–746,Google Scholar

Davidson, K. and Pitts, D., Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation for non-commutative analytic Toeplitz algebras, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 31(3) (1998), 321–337.Google Scholar

Davidson, K.R., Free semigroup algebras: a survey, Systems, Approximation, Singular Integral Operators, and Related Topics (Eds. A.A. Borichev and N.K. Nikolski), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 129, Birkhauser, Basel, 2001, pp. 209–240.Google Scholar

Deepak, K.D., Deepak, K.P., Sarkar, J., and Timotin, D., Commutant lifting and Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation in several variables, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 92(3) (2020), 15 pp.Google Scholar

Douglas, R.G., On majorization, factorization, and range inclusion of operators on Hilbert space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 413–415.Google Scholar

Douglas, R.G., Structure theory for operators, J. Reine Angew. Math. 232 (1968), 180–193.Google Scholar

Douglas, R.G., Misra, G., and Sarkar, J., Contractive Hilbert modules and their dilations, Israel J. Math. 187 (2012), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dullerud, G.E. and Paganini, F., A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach, Texts in Applied Mathematics 36, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.Google Scholar

Duren, P. and Schuster, A., Bergman Spaces, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 100, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004.Google Scholar

Duren, P., Khavinson, D., Shapiro, H.S., and Sundberg, C., Contractive zero-divisors in Bergman spaces, Pacific J. Math. 157(1) (1993), 37–56.Google Scholar

Duren, P., Khavinson, D., Shapiro, H.S., and Sundberg, C., Invariant subspaces in Bergman spaces and the biharmonic equation, Michigan Math. J. 41(2) (1994), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eschmeier, J., Bergman inner functions and m-hypercontractions, J. Funct. Anal. 275(1) (2018), 73–102.Google Scholar

Eschmeier, J. and Langendörfer, S., Multivariable Bergman shifts and Wold decompositions, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 90(5) (2018), Art. 56, 17 pp.Google Scholar

Fliess, M., Matrices de Hankel, Une théorie fonctionnelle de la réalisation en filtrage multidimensionnel, échantillonné, récurrent, Inform. Control 43 (1979), 338–355.Google Scholar

Foias, C. and Frazho, A.E., The Commutant Lifting Approach to Interpolation Problems. Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 44, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1990.Google Scholar

Foias, C., Frazho, A.E., Gohberg, I., and Kaashoek, M.A., Metric Constrained Interpolation, Commutant Lifting and Systems, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 100, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1998.Google Scholar

Frazho, A.E., A shift operator approach to bilinear system theory, SIAM J. Control 1(6) (1980), 640–658.Google Scholar

Frazho, A.E., Models for noncommuting operators, J. Funct. Anal. 48(1) (1982), 1–11.Google Scholar

Frazho, A.E., ter Horst, S., and Kaashoek, M.A., All solutions to an operator Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation problem, Operator Theory in Different Settings and Related Applications (Eds. R. Duduchava et al.), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 262,Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 139220.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, P.A., Linear Systems and Operators in Hilbert Space, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981.Google Scholar

Gleason, A.M., Finitely generated ideals in Banach algebras, J. Math. Mech. 13 (1964), 125–132.Google Scholar

Giselsson, O. and Olofsson, A., On some Bergman shift operators, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 6(4) (2012), 829–842.Google Scholar

Golub, G.H. and van Loan, C.F., Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins Series in Mathematical Sciences 3, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1983.Google Scholar

Gorai, S. and Sarkar, J., Contractively embedded invariant subspaces, Interpolation and Realization Theory with Applications to Control Theory (Eds. V. Bolotnikov et al.), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 272, Birkhäouser/Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gupta, R., Kumar, S., and Trivedi, S., Unitary equivalence of operator-valued multishifts, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 497(2) (2020), Art. 124032, 23 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halmos, P. R., Shifts on Hilbert spaces, J. Reine Angew. Math. 208 (1961), 102– 112.Google Scholar

Hartz, M., Every complete Pick space satisfies the column-row property, arXiv:2005.09614v1.Google Scholar

Hedenmalm, H., A factorization theorem for square area-integrable analytic functions, J. Reine Angew. Math. 422 (1991), 45–68.Google Scholar

Hedenmalm, H., A factoring theorem for a weighted Bergman space, Algebra i Analiz 4(1) (1992), 167–176; translation in St. Petersburg Math. J. 4(1) (1993), 163–174.Google Scholar

Hedenmalm, H., Korenblum, B., and Zhu, K., Theory of Bergman Spaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 199, Springer, Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar

Hedenmalm, H., Zhu, K., On the failure of optimal factorization for certain weighted Bergman spaces, Complex Variables Theory Appl. 19(3) (1992), 165–176.Google Scholar

Helton, J.W., Passive network realization using abstract operator theory, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory CT-19 (1972), 518–520.Google Scholar

Helton, J.W., Discrete time systems, operator models, and scattering theory, J. Funct. Anal. 16 (1974), 15–38.Google Scholar

Helton, J.W., I. Klep, and S. McCullough, Free convex algebraic geometry, Semidefinite Optimization and Convex Algebraic Geometry (Eds. G. Blekherman, P.A. Parrilo, and R.R. Thomas), MOS-SIAM Ser. Optim., 13, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2013, pp. 341–405.Google Scholar

Helton, J.W., Mai, T., and Speicher, R., Applications of realizations (aka linearizations) to free probability, J. Funct. Anal. 274(1) (2018), 1–79.Google Scholar

Hoffman, K., Banach Spaces of Analytic Functions, Dover, New York, 1988.Google Scholar

Horowitz, C., Zeros of functions in the Bergman space, Duke Math. J. 41 (1974), 693–710.Google Scholar

Izuchi, K. J., Izuchi, K. H., and Izuchi, Y., Wandering subspaces and the Beurling type Theorem I, Arch. Math. 95(5) (2010), 439–446.Google Scholar

Izuchi, K. J., Izuchi, K. H., and Izuchi, Y., Quasi-wandering subspaces in the Bergman space, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 67(2) (2010), 151–161.Google Scholar

Jacob, B., Partington, J.R., Pott, S., and Wynn, A., β-admissibility of observation operators for hypercontractive semigroups, J. Evol. Equ. 18 (2018), 153–170.Google Scholar

Jury, M.T. and Martin, R.T.W., Non-commutative Clark theory for the free and abelian Toeplitz algebras, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 456(2) (2017), 1062–1100.Google Scholar

Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi, D. and Vinnikov, V., Foundations of Free Noncommutative Function Theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 199, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014.Google Scholar

Kalman, R.E., Falb, P.L., and Arbib, M.A., Topics in Mathematical Systems Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York/Toronto, ON/London, 1969.Google Scholar

Katsnel’son, V.È., Kheĭfets, A.Y., and Yuditskiĭ, P.M., An abstract interpolation problem and the theory of extensions of isometric operators, Operators in Function Spaces and Problems in Function Theory (Ed. V.A. Marchenko), Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1987, pp. 83–96; translation in Topics in Interpolation Theory (Eds. H. Dym et al.), Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 95, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1997, pp. 283–298.Google Scholar

Knuth, D. E., The Art of Computer Programming, I, Fundamental algorithms, Wiley, New York, 1997.Google Scholar

Krein, M., Concerning the resolvents of an Hermitian operator with the deficiency-index (m, m), Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 52 (1946), 651–654.Google Scholar

M. Krein, The theory of self-adjoint extensions of semi-bounded Hermitian transformations and its applications. I, Mat. Sbornik 20 (1947), 431–495.Google Scholar

Krein, M. G. and Krasnoselskii, M. A., Fundamental theorems on the extension of Hermitian operators and certain of their applications to the theory of orthogonal polynomials and the problem of moments, Uspehi Matem. Nauk 2(3) (1947), 60–106.Google Scholar

Krein, M. G. and Saakjan, S. N., Certain new results in the theory of resolvents of Hermitian operators, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 169 (1966), 1269–1272.Google Scholar

Kriete, T.L., Canonical models and the self-adjoint parts of dissipative operators, J. Funct. Anal. 23(1) (1976), 39–94.Google Scholar

Kumari, R., Sarkar, J., Sarkar, S., and Timotin, D., Factorizations of kernels and reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 87(2) (2017), 225–244.Google Scholar

Lax, P.D., Translation invariant spaces, Acta Math. 101 (1959), 161–178,Google Scholar

Leech, R.B., Factorization of analytic functions and operator inequalities, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 78(1) (2014), 71–73.Google Scholar

Livšic, M.S., On the theory of isometric operators with equal deficiency indices (Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 58 ( 1947 ), 13-15.Google Scholar

Livsic, M.S., On the reduction of a linear non-Hermitian operator to “triangular” form (Russian), doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 85 (1952), 873–876.Google Scholar

Mai, T. and Speicher, R., Flee probability, random matrices, and representations of non-commutative rational functions, Computation and Combinatorics in Dynamics Stochastics, and Control (Eds. E. Celledon et al.), Abel Symp, 13, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 551–577.Google Scholar

Martin, R.T.W. and Shamovich, E., A de Branges-Beurling theorem for the full Fock space, J. Math. Anal. Appl., to appear.Google Scholar

McCullough, S. and Trent, T.T., Invariant subspaces and Nevanlinna-Pick kernels, J. Funct. Anal. 178(1) (2000), 226–249.Google Scholar

Muhly, P. S. and Solel, B., Tensor algebras over C^∗-correspondences: representations, dilations, and C^∗-envelopes, J. Funct. Anal. 158(2) (1998), 389–457.Google Scholar

Muhly, P. S. and Solel, B., Canonical models for representations of Hardy algebras, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 53(3) (2005), 411–452.Google Scholar

Muhly, P. S. and Solel, B., Schur class functions and automorphisms of Hardy algebras, Doc. Math. 13 (2008), 365–411.Google Scholar

Muhly, P. S. and Solel, B., Matricial function theory and weighted shifts, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 84(4) (2016), 501–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, V., Models for operators using weighted shifts, J. Operator Theory 20(1) (1988), 3–20.Google Scholar

Müller, V. and Vasilescu, F.H., Standard models for some commuting multioperators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 117(4) (1993), 979–989.Google Scholar

Nikolski, N.K, Operators, Functions, and Systems: An Easy Reading. Vol. 1. Hardy, Hankel, and Toeplitz, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 92 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.Google Scholar

Nikolski, N.K., Operators, Functions, and Systems: An Easy Reading. Vol. 2. Model Operators and Systems, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 93, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002.Google Scholar

Olofsson, A., A characteristic operator function for the class of n-hypercontractions, J. Funct. Anal. 236(2) (2006), 517–545.Google Scholar

Olofsson, A., An operator-valued Berezin transform and the class of n-hypercontractions, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 58(4) (2007), 503–549.Google Scholar

Olofsson, A., Operator-valued Bergman inner functions as transfer functions, Algebra i Analiz 19(4) (2007), 146–173.Google Scholar

Olofsson, A. and Wennman, A., Operator identities for standard weighted Bergman shift and Toeplitz operators, J. Operator Theory 70(2) (2013), 451–475.Google Scholar

Olofsson, A., Parts of adjoint weighted shifts, J. Operator Theory 74(2) (2015), 249–280.Google Scholar

Paulsen, V., Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 78, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.Google Scholar

Petersen, I.A., Anderson, B.D.O., and Jonkheere, E.A., A first principles solution to the non-singular H^∞-control problem, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Con. 1 (1991), 171–185.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Models for infinite sequences of noncommuting operators, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 53(3–4) (1989), 355–368.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Isometric dilations for infinite sequences of noncommuting operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 316(2) (1989), 523–536.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Characteristic functions for infinite sequences of noncommuting operators, J. Operator Theory 22(1) (1989), 51–71.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Multi-analytic operators and some factorization theorems, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 38(3) (1989), 693–710.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Multi-analytic operators on Fock spaces, Math. Ann. 303(1) (1995), 31–46.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Free holomorphic functions on the unit ball of B(H)ⁿ, J. Funct. Anal. 241(1) (2006), 268–333.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Operator theory on noncommutative varieties, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 55(2) (2006), 389–442.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Operator theory on noncommutative varieties II, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135(7) (2007), 2151–2164.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Noncommutative Berezin transforms and multivariable operator model theory, J. Funct. Anal. 254(4) (2008), 1003–1057.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Operator theory on noncommutative domains, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 205(964), 2010.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Berezin transforms on noncommutative varieties in polydomains, J. Funct. Anal. 265(10) (2013), 2500–2552.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Berezin transforms on noncommutative polydomains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368(6) (2016), 4375–4416.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Invariant subspaces and operator model theory on noncommutative varieties, Math. Ann. 372(1–2) (2018), 611–650.Google Scholar

Popescu, G., Noncommutative hyperballs, wandering subspaces, and inner functions, J. Funct. Anal. 276(11) (2019), 3406–3440.Google Scholar

Pott, S., Standard models under polynomial positivity conditions, J. Operator Theory 41(2) (1999), 365–389.Google Scholar

Reed, M. and Simon, B., Methods of Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, Academic Press, San Diego, 1980.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, M. and Rovnyak, J., Hardy Classes and Operator Theory. Oxford Math. Monographs, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.Google Scholar

Rota, G.-C., On models for linear operators, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13 (1960), 469–472.Google Scholar

Rudin, W., Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Third edition, International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar

Salomon, G., Shalit, O.M., and Shamovich, E., Algebras of bounded noncommutative analytic functions on subvarieties of the noncommutative unit ball, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 370(12) (2018), 8639–8690.Google Scholar

Sarason, D., Generalized interpolation in H^∞, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.- 127 (1967), 179–293.Google Scholar

Sarason, D., Sub-Hardy Hilbert Spaces in the Unit Disk, University of Arkansas Lecture Notes in Mathematical Sciences 10, Wiley, New York, 1994.Google Scholar

Sarkar, J., invariant subspace theorem and invariant subspaces of analytic reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces I, J. Operator Theory 73(2) (2015), 433–441.Google Scholar

Sarkar, J., An invariant subspace theorem and invariant subspaces of analytic reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces II, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 10(4)(2016), 769–782.Google Scholar

Schiitzenberger, M.P., On the definition of a family of automata, Inform. Control 4 (1961), 218–220.Google Scholar

Shields, A.L., Weighted shift operators and analytic function theory, Topics in Operator Theory (Ed. C. Pearcy), Mathematical Surveys 13, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1974, pp. 49–128.Google Scholar

Shimorin, S., Wold-type decompositions and wandering subspaces for operators close to isometries, J. Reine Angew. Math. 531 (2001), 147–189.Google Scholar

Shimorin, S., On Beurling-type theorems in weighted ℓ² and Bergman spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131(6) (2003), 1777–1787.Google Scholar

Solel, B., Invariant subspaces for certain tuples of operators with applications to reproducing kernel correspondences, Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 92(4) (2020), Art. 38, 22 pp.Google Scholar

Sz.-Nagy, B. and Foias, C., Sur les contractions de l’espace de Hilbert VIII, Acta Sci. Math. 25 (1964), 38–71.Google Scholar

Sz.-Nagy, B., Foias, C., Bercovici, H., and Kércy, L., Harmonic Analysis of Operators on Hilbert Space, Universitext, Springer, New York, 2010.Google Scholar

Taylor, J.L., Functions of several noncommuting variables, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 1–34.Google Scholar

Timotin, D., Regular dilations and models for multicontractions, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 47(2) (1998), 671–684.Google Scholar

Vinnikov, V., Commuting operators and function theory on a Riemann surface, Holomorphic Spaces (Eds.S.Axler,J.E.McCarthy,andD.Sarason),Math.Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 33, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998, pp. 445–476.Google Scholar

Vukotić, D., Linear extremal problems for Bergman spaces, Exposition. Math. 14(4) (1996), 313–352.Google Scholar

Weiss, G., Two conjectures on the admissibility of control operators, Estimation an Control of Distributed Parameter Systems (Eds. W. Desch, F. Kappel, and K. Kunisch), Internat. Ser. Numer. Math. 100, Birkhäuser-Verlag, 1991, pp. 367–378.Google Scholar

Wold, H., A Study in Analysis of Stationary Time Series, Almquist und Wiksell, Uppsala, 1938.Google Scholar