This chapter contains views expressed by eighteen human rights academics in response to two questions: what in your view are the three most influential ideas put forward during the last ten years on the topic of digital human rights? What in your view are the two or three most significant challenges related to digital human rights which necessitate conceptualisation from academia? As a generalisation, the following was concluded. The academic discourse on digital human rights takes non-coherence as an implicit condition. This theory will turn the implicit assumption into an explicit condition. This explicit condition needs to be applied to several concepts of the highest importance, pointed out the academics: digital constitutionalism, digital democracy, overlapping human rights systems and the typology of digital human rights law development.