Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T14:44:53.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

Keith Ansell-Pearson
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Paul S. Loeb
Affiliation:
University of Puget Sound, Washington
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Nietzsche's ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra'
A Critical Guide
, pp. 247 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Abbey, Ruth (2000). Nietzsche’s Middle Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abbey, Ruth and Appel, Fredrick (1998). “Nietzsche and the Will to Politics.” The Review of Politics, 60: 83114.Google Scholar
Abel, Günter (1998). Nietzsche: Die Dynamik der Willen zur Macht und die ewige Wiederkehr. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Abel, Günter (2015). “Consciousness, Language, and Nature.” In Nietzsche on Mind and Nature, ed. Dries, M. and Kail, P. J. E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Acampora, Christa Davis (2006). “On Sovereignty and Overhumanity: Why It Matters How We Read Nietzsche’s Genealogy II:2.” In Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morality: Critical Essays, ed. Acampora, C. D., 147161. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Acampora, Christa Davis (2013). Contesting Nietzsche. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Acampora, Christa and Ansell-Pearson, Keith (2011). Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil: A Reader’s Guide. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Acampora, Ralph. (1994). “Using and Abusing Nietzsche for Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics, 16 (2): 187194.Google Scholar
Alfano, Mark (2018). “A Schooling in Contempt: Emotions and the Pathos of Distance.” In Katsafanas (2018a), 121–139.Google Scholar
Alfano, Mark (2019). Nietzsche’s Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier (2005). “Nietzsche on Truth, Illusion, and Redemption.” European Journal of Philosophy, 13 (2): 185225.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier (2009). “Nietzsche on Redemption and Transfiguration.” In The Re-Enchantment of the World: Secular Magic in a Rational Age, eds. Landy, J. and Saler, M., 225258. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier (2017). Online. “Friedrich Nietzsche.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E.. (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche)Google Scholar
Anderson, R. Lanier and Cristy, Rachel (2017). “What Is ‘The Meaning of our Cheerfulness’? Philosophy as a Way of Life in Nietzsche and Montaigne.” European Journal of Philosophy, 25 (4): 15141549.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith (1992). “Who Is the Ubermensch? Time, Truth, and Woman in Nietzsche.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 53 (2): 309331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith (1994). An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker: The Perfect Nihilist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith (1997). Viroid Life: Perspectives on Nietzsche and the Transhuman Condition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith (2013). “Free Spirits and Free Thinkers: Nietzsche and Guyau on the Future of Morality.” In Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Philosophy of the Future, ed. Metzger, J., 102125. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith (2021). “Making Sense of Nietzsche as a Sceptic.” In On Nietzsche Making Sense of Nietzsche, eds. Denat, C. and Wotling, P.. Reims: Reims University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell-Pearson, Keith and Large, Duncan (eds.) (2006). The Nietzsche Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Appel, Fredrick (1999). Nietzsche Contra Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Arkema, K. et al. (2013). “Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms.” Nature Climate Change, 3: 913918.Google Scholar
Babich, Babette (2013). “Nietzsche’s Zarathustra and Parodic Style: On Lucian’s Hyperanthropos and Nietzsche’s Übermensch.” Diogenes, 58 (4): 5874.Google Scholar
Babich, Babette (2014) “Nietzsche and/or/versus Darwin.” Common Knowledge, 20 (3): 404411.Google Scholar
Babich, Babette (2017). “Nietzsche’s Posthuman Imperative: On the ‘All-too-Human’ Dream of Transhumanism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 101–132.Google Scholar
Bamford, Rebecca (2017). “Nietzsche on Ethical Transhumanism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 205–219.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Beam, Craig (1996). “Hume and Nietzsche.” Hume Studies, 22 (2): 299324.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2016). Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Macalester (2013). Hard Feelings: The Moral Psychology of Contempt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Porat, Ziva (1979). “Method in Madness: Notes on the Structure of Parody, Based on MAD TV Satires.” Poetics Today, 1: 245272.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1965). Creative Mind, trans. Andison, M. L.. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.Google Scholar
Blanshard, Brand (1954). On Philosophical Style. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick (2008). “Why I want to be a Posthuman when I grow up.” In Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, eds. Gordijn, B. and Chadwick, R.. 107137. Cardiff: Springer Science.Google Scholar
Bourget, Paul (1920). Essais de psychologie contemporaine, vol. 1. Paris: Libraire Plon.Google Scholar
Brobjer, Thomas (2008). Nietzsche’s Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bruford, W. H. (1975). The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation: “Bildung” from Humboldt to Thomas Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Callicott, Baird (1989). In Defense of the Land Ethic. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Campioni, Giuliano (2000). “Der höhere Mensch nach dem Tod Gottes.Nietzsche-Studien, 28: 336355.Google Scholar
Campioni, Giuliano (2001). Les lectures françaises de Nietzsche. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Campioni, Giuliano (2008). La morale dell’eroe. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Campioni, Giuliano (2018). “‘Vivere pericolosamente’. Il funambolo e gli uomini superiori nello Zarathustra di Nietzsche.” In Arte e Scienza: miscellanea in onore di Aldo Venturelli, ed. Renzi, L., 129140. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Campioni, Giuliano, D’Iorio, Paolo, Fornari, Maria Cristina, Fronterotta, Francesco, and Orsucci, Andrea (2003). Nietzsche persönliche Bibliothek (BN). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cartwright, David E. (1988). “Schopenhauer’s Compassion and Nietzsche’s Pity.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch, 69: 557565.Google Scholar
Cartwright, David E. (1993). “The Last Temptation of Zarathustra.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 31 (1): 4969.Google Scholar
Cauchi, Francesca (1998). Zarathustra Contra Zarathustra. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Chase, Michael (2013). “Observations on Pierre Hadot’s Conception of Philosophy as a Way of Life.” In Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns. Essays in Honor of Pierre Hadot, eds. Chase, M., Clark, S., McGhee, M., 262286. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie (1990). Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie (1999). “Nietzsche’s Antidemocratic Rhetoric.Southern Journal of Philosophy, 37, Supplement: 119141.Google Scholar
Conant, James (2001). “Nietzsche’s Perfectionism: A Reading of Schopenhauer as Educator.” In Nietzsche’s Post Moralism, ed. Schacht, R., 181257. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William (1991). Identity/Difference. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, Daniel (1988). “Solving the Problem of Socrates: Nietzsche’s Zarathustra as Political Irony.” Political Theory, 16: 257280.Google Scholar
Connolly, William (1990). “Nietzsche contra Nietzsche. The Deconstruction of Zarathustra.” In Nietzsche as Postmodernist, ed. Koelb, C., 91110. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William (1997). Nietzsche and the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Connolly, William (1997). Nietzsche’s Dangerous Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creasy, Kaitlyn (2020). The Problem of Affective Nihilism in Nietzsche: Thinking Differently, Feeling Differently. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Daigle, Christine (2011). “Nietzsche’s Notion of Embodied Self: Proto-Phenomenology at Work?Nietzsche-Studien, 40: 226243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannhauser, Werner (1974). Nietzsche’s View of Socrates. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dannhauser, Werner (1987). “Friedrich Nietzsche.” In History of Political Philosophy, 3rd edition, ed. Strauss, L. and Cropsey, J., 829850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Del Caro, Adrian (2004). Grounding the Nietzsche Rhetoric of Earth. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles (1994). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dentith, Simon (2000). Parody. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Detwiler, Bruce (1990). Nietzsche and the Politics of Aristocratic Radicalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
D’Iorio, Paolo (2000). “Genèse, parodie et modernité dans Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra.” In Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra, ed. Merlio, G., 2543. Paris: éditions du Temps.Google Scholar
D’Iorio, Paolo (2010). “The Eternal Return: Genesis and Interpretation.” The Agonist, 3 (1): 747.Google Scholar
D’Iorio, Paolo (2014). “The Eternal Return: Genesis and Interpretation.” Lexicon Philosophicum: Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas, 2: 4196.Google Scholar
D’Iorio, Paolo (2016). Nietzsche’s Journey to Sorrento. Genesis of the Philosophy of the Free Spirit. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dombowsky, Don (2004). Nietzsche’s Machiavellian Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Doyle, Tsarina (2009). Nietzsche on Epistemology and Metaphysics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Drenthen, Martin. (2005). “Wildness as a critical border concept: Nietzsche and the debate on wilderness restoration.” Environmental Values 14 (3): 317337.Google Scholar
Drochon, Hugo (2017). Nietzsche’s Great Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo (1983). “The American Scholar.” In Essays and Lectures, 5171. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo (2000). “Spiritual Laws.” In The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Atkinson, B., 172190. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Erlich, Victor (1965). Russian Formalism: History-Doctrine. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferré, Frederick (1994). “Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm?Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 36: 5973.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Margot (1993). Der “Sinn der Erde” und die Entzauberung des Übermenschen: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Nietzsche. Darmstad: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Foenander, John (2011). A Reading of Nietzsche’s Metaethics. Unpublished master’s thesis, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2011). The Courage of Truth (The Government of Self and Others II). Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–84, eds. Gros, F., trans. Burchell, G.. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Franco, Paul (2014). “Tocqueville and Nietzsche on the Problem of Human Greatness in Democracy.” The Review of Politics, 76: 439467.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael L. (2006). “The Compassion of Zarathustra: Nietzsche on Sympathy and Strength.” The Review of Politics, 68 (1): 4978.Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea (2017). “Plato’s Ethics: An Overview.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N..Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1960). The Ego and the Id, ed. and trans. Strachey, J.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Froese, Katrin (2017). “Redeeming Laughter in Nietzsche.” In Why Can’t Philosophers laugh? 7396. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1986). “Das Drama Zarathustras.” Nietzsche-Studien, 15 (1): 115.Google Scholar
Gallois, Andre (2016). Online. “Identity Over Time.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/identity-time/)Google Scholar
Gemes, Ken. (1992). “Nietzsche’s Critique of Truth.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52 (1): 4765.Google Scholar
Gemes, Ken. (2006). “‘We Remain of Necessity Strangers to Ourselves’: The Key Message of Nietzsche’s Genealogy.” In Nietzsche’s on the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays, ed. Acampora, C., 191208. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gemes, Ken. (2013). “Life’s perspectives.” In Gemes and Richardson (2013), 553–575.Google Scholar
Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John (eds.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gemes, Ken and May, Simon (eds.) (2009). Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard (1982). Palimpsestes: La Littérature au Second Degré. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Volker (2006). “The Body, the Self and the Ego.” In A Companion to Nietzsche, ed. Ansell-Pearson, K., 273296. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael (2007). “Moral Rationalism Vs. Moral Sentimentalism: Is Morality More Like Math or Beauty?Philosophy Compass, 2 (1): 1630.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael (2017). Nietzsche’s Final Teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander L. (1975). “Incipit parodia: The Function of Parody in the Lyrical Poetry of Friedrich Nietzsche.” Nietzsche-Studien, 4: 5274.Google Scholar
Gilman, Sander L. (2001). Nietzschean Parody. An Introduction to Reading Nietzsche. Second, expanded edition. Aurora, CO: The Davies Group.Google Scholar
Gooding-Williams, Robert. (2001). Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Michael Steven (2002). Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Drew E. (1994). “Nietzsche on Tragedy and Parody.” Philosophy and Literature, 18 (2): 339347.Google Scholar
Groddeck, Wolfram (1991). Friedrich Nietzsche – Dionysos-Dithyramben. Band 1: Textgenetische Edition der Vorstufen und Reinschriften. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life, ed. Davidson, A.. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (2002). What Is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (2009). The Present Alone Is Our Happiness. Conversations with Jeannie Carlier and Arnold Davidson, trans. Djaballah, Marc. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (2020). The Selected Writings of Pierre Hadot. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hallman, Max (1991). “Nietzsche’s Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics, 13 (2): 99125.Google Scholar
Han-Pile, Beatrice (2011). “Nietzsche and Amor Fati.” European Journal of Philosophy, 19 (2): 224261.Google Scholar
Hatab, Lawrence J. (1988). “Laughter in Nietzsche’s Thought: A Philosophical Tragicomedy.” International Studies in Philosophy, 20 (2): 6779.Google Scholar
Hatab, Lawrence J. (1995). A Nietzschean Defense of Democracy: An Experiment in Postmodern Politics. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Hatab, Lawrence J. (2018). “What Kind of Text Is Zarathustra?The Agonist, 11 (2): 17.Google Scholar
Hayward, Max (2019). “Immoral Realism.” Philosophical Studies 176 (4): 897914.Google Scholar
Hellwald, Friedrich von (1875). Culturgeschichte in ihrer natürlichen Entwicklung bis zur Gegenwart. Augsburg: Lampart & Co.Google Scholar
Higgins, Kathleen Marie (1987). Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, Kathleen Marie (1987). “Zarathustra Is a Comic Book.” Philosophy and Literature, 16 (1): 114.Google Scholar
Higgins, Kathleen Marie (2010). Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Revised ed. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hollingdale, R. J. (1969). “Introduction.” In Z 1969, 11–35.Google Scholar
Hollingdale, R. J. (1973). Nietzsche. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie (1993). Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W. (1944). “Παρωιδια.Journal of Classical Philology, 39: 19.Google Scholar
Huang, Jing (2019). “Did Nietzsche Want His Notes Burned? Some Reflections on the Nachlass Problem.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (6): 11941214.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Andrew (2019). “The Value of our Values: Nietzsche.” In A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Shand, J., 339364. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Andrew (2020). Online. “Nietzsche’s Aesthetics.” Philosophy Compass 15 (11). (https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12706)Google Scholar
Hume, David (2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lester (1991). Nietzsche and the Origin of Virtue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas (2001). Virtue, Vice, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda (1985). A Theory of Parody: The Teaching of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda (2000). Parody. The Teaching of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce (1991). Marine Lover of Friedrich Nietzsche, trans. Gill, Gillian C.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
James, William (1950). The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (1997). “Kant’s Aesthetics and the ‘Empty Cognitive Stock.’Philosophical Quarterly, 47: 459–76.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (1998) (ed.). Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (2007). Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche’s Genealogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (2017a). “Attitudes to Suffering: Parfit and Nietzsche.” Inquiry 60: 6695.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (2017b). “On the Very Idea of ‘Justifying Suffering.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 48 (2): 152170.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (2018). “Schopenhauer on the Aimlessness of the Will.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26 (2): 331347.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (2020). “The Moral Meaning of the World.” In The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer, ed. Wicks, R., 272281. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Janz, Curt Paul (1981). Friedrich Nietzsche Biographie. Band 2: Die zehn Jahre des freien Philosophen. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl (1965). Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Understanding of his Philosophical Activity, trans. Wallraff, Charles F. and Schmitz, Frederick J.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Scott (2012). “Time and Personal Identity in Nietzsche’s Theory of Eternal Recurrence.” Philosophy Compass, 7 (3): 208217.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Scott (2018). “Ressentiment, Imaginary Revenge, and the Slave Revolt.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96 (1): 192213.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Scott (2020). “The Pessimistic Origin of Nietzsche’s Thought of Eternal Recurrence.” Inquiry, 63: 2041.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dirk R. (2019). “Zarathustra: Nietzsche’s Rendezvous with Eternity.” In Stern (2019a), 173–194.Google Scholar
Kail, P. J. E. (2009). “Nietzsche and Hume: Naturalism and Explanation.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 37: 522.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Korsgaard, C. and trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P., Lalasz, R. and Marvier, M. (2012). “Conservation in the Anthropocene: Beyond Solitude and Fragility,” Breakthrough Journal, Winter.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul (2011). “Deriving Ethics from Action: A Nietzschean Version of Constitutivism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 83 (3): 620660.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. (2013a). Agency and the Foundations of Ethics: Nietzschean Constitutivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. (2013b). “Nietzsche’s Philosophical Psychology,” in Gemes and Richardson (2013), 727–755.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. (2015). “Fugitive Pleasure and the Meaningful Life: Nietzsche on Nihilism and Higher Values.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1: 396416.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. (2016). The Nietzschean Self: Moral Psychology, Agency, and the Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. (ed.) (2018a). The Nietzschean Mind. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. (2018b). “The Antichrist as a guide to Nietzsche’s mature ethical theory.” In Katsafanas (2018a), 83–102.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter (1971a). “Introduction.” In The Portable Nietzsche, ed. Kaufmann, W., 119. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter (1971b). “Thus Spoke Zarathustra: Editor’s Preface.” In The Portable Nietzsche, ed. Kaufmann, W., 103111. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter (1974). Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kerkman, Jan (2017). “Die Einkreisung der schwarzen Schlange: Zur Figur des Wahrsagers im Zarathustra.” In Nietzsche als Dichter, eds. Grätz, K. and Kaufmann, S., 245272. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1999). “Self-Constitution in the Ethics of Plato and Kant.” The Journal of Ethics, 3 (1): 129.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2008). The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lampert, Laurence (1986). Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lampert, Laurence (1993). Nietzsche and Modern times: A Study of Bacon, Descartes, and Nietzsche. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian (1992). “Nietzsche and Aestheticism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 30 (2): 275290.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian (2002). Nietzsche on Morality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian (2013). “Nietzsche’s Naturalism Reconsidered.” In Gemes and Richardson (2013), 576–598.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian (2015). Nietzsche on Morality, second edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian (2019). Moral Psychology with Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lelièvre, Francis J. (1954). “The Basis of Ancient Parody.” Greece & Rome, 1 (2): 6681.Google Scholar
Lemanski, Jens (2012). “The Denial of the Will-to-Live in Schopenhauer’s World and His Association between Buddhist and Christian Saints.” In Understanding Schopenhauer through the Prism of Indian Culture: Philosophy, Religion and Sanskrit Literature, 149183, eds. Barua, A., Gerhard, M., and Koßler, M. (Berlin: de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. (2004). “The Overhuman Animal.” In A Nietzschean Bestiary: Becoming Animal Beyond Docile and Brutal, ed. Davis, C. and Acampora, R. R.. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. (2009). Nietzsche’s Animal Psychology. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Lemm, Vanessa. (2020). Homo Natura: Nietzsche, Philosophical Anthropology and Biopolitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lenman, James (2014). “Deliberation, Schmeliberation: Enoch’s Indispensability Argument.” Philosophical Studies, 168: 835842.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo. (1949). “The Land Ethic.” In A Sand County Almanac, 201226. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf (2006). The Seduction of Culture in German History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Liebscher, Martin (2008). Review of G. von Tevenar (ed.), Nietzsche and Ethics. The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 35/36: 161164.Google Scholar
Lippit, John (1992). “Nietzsche, Zarathustra, and the Status of Laughter.” The British Journal of Aesthetics, 32: 3949.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2000). “The Conclusion of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra.” International Studies in Philosophy, 32 (3): 137152.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2005). “Finding the Übermensch in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morality.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 30: 71102.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2006). “Finding the Übermensch in Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morality.” In Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays, ed. Acampora, C., 163176. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2010). The Death of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2013). “Eternal Recurrence.” In Gemes and Richardson (2013), 645–671.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2015a). “Will to Power and Panpsychism: A New Exegesis of Beyond Good and Evil, 36.” In Nietzsche on Mind and Nature, eds. Dries, M. and Kail, P. J. E., 5788. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2015b). “The Rebirth of Nietzsche’s Zarathustra.” In The Agonist: A Nietzsche Circle Journal, 8 (2): 119.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2017a). “Nietzsche’s Transhumanism: Evolution and Eternal Recurrence.” In Tuncel (2017a), 83–100.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2017b). “Nietzsche’s Place in the Aristotelian History of Philosophy.” In Nietzsche and the Philosophers, ed. Conard, M. T., 939. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2018). “The Colossal Moment in Nietzsche’s Gay Science §341.” In Katsafanas (2018a), 428–447.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2019a). “Nietzsche’s Critique of Kant’s Priestly Philosophy.” In Nietzsche and The Antichrist: Religion, Politics, and Culture in Late Modernity, ed. Conway, D., 89115. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2019b). “Genuine Philosophers, Will to Power, and Value-Creation.” In Nietzsche’s Metaphilosophy, eds. Loeb, P. and Meyer, M., 83105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2021a). “Ecce superhomo: How Zarathustra became what Nietzsche was not.” In Nietzsche’s “Ecce Homo,” eds. Large, D. and Martin, N., 207233. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2021b). “Nietzsche’s Heraclitean Doctrine of The Eternal Recurrence of the Same.” Nietzsche-Studien, 50: 1.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. (2022). “What does Nietzsche mean by ‘the same’ in his theory of eternal recurrence The Journal of Nietzsche Studies 53(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Loeb, Paul S. and Tinsley, David F. (2019). “Translators’ Afterword.” In CWFN (2019), 717–797.Google Scholar
Loschenkohl, Birte (2020). “Nietzsche’s ‘Great Politics’ and Zarathustra’s New Peoples.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 51: 2145.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. (1997), Nietzsche’s Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same, trans. Lomax, J. Harvey. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Luchte, James (ed). (2008). Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra: Before Sunrise. London: Continuum Publishing.Google Scholar
Ludovici, Anthony M. (1909). “Notes on ‘Thus Spake Zarathustra.’” In Z 1909, 405–458.Google Scholar
Magnus, Bernd (1978). Nietzsche’s Existential Imperative. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Magnus, Bernd (1988). “The Deification of the Commonplace: Twilight of the Idols.” In Nietzsche: A Collection of Critical Essays, eds. Solomon, R. and Higgins, K. M., 152181. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malebranche, N. (1997). The Search after Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Ferruccio (1973). “Rhythmisch-metaphorische ‘Bedeutungsfelder’ in Also Sprach Zarathustra.” Nietzsche-Studien, 2: 276307.Google Scholar
Mason, Michelle (2003). “Contempt as a Moral Attitude.” Ethics, 113 (2): 234272.Google Scholar
McDowell, John (1998). Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthew (2014). Reading Nietzsche through the Ancients: An Analysis of Becoming, Perspectivism, and the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthew (2015). “Nietzsche’s Naturalized Aestheticism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23 (1): 138160.Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthew (2019). Nietzsche’s Free Spirit Works: A Dialectical Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Jonathan (2020). Online. “A Nietzschean Theory of Emotional Experience: Affect as Feeling towards Value.” Inquiry. (www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1850341)Google Scholar
Montinari, Mazzino (2003). Reading Nietzsche, trans. Whitlock, G.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
More, Max (2017). “The Overhuman in the Transhuman.” In Tuncel (2017a), 27–31.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander (2000). “For Whom the Sun Shines: A Reading of Also Sprach Zarathustra.” In Friedrich Nietzsche: Also Sprach Zarathustra, ed. Gerhardt, V., 165190. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nyholm, Sven (2015). “Love Troubles: Human Attachment and Biomedical Enhancements.” Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32 (2): 190202.Google Scholar
O’ Keefe, T. (2010). Epicureanism. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Oppel, Frances Nesbitt (2005). Nietzsche on Gender: Beyond Man and Woman. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Owen, David (1995). Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Palmeri, Frank (2011). ‘‘Satire and the Psychology of Religion in Swift and Nietzsche.’’ In Swiftly Sterneward: Essays on Laurence Sterne and His Times in Honor of Melvyn New, eds. Gerard, W. B., Derek Taylor, E., and Walker, Robert G., 143159. Newark: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Parkes, Graham (1999). “Nietzsche as Ecological Thinker.” In Nietzsche’s Futures, ed. Lippitt, J., 167188. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Parkes, Graham (2005). “Explanatory Notes.” In Z (2005), 288–321.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (1988). “Irony and Affirmation in Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra.” In Nietzsche’s New Seas: Explorations in Philosophy, Aesthetics, and Politics, eds. Gillespie, M. A. and Strong, T. B., 4571. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2006). “Introduction.” In Z (2006), viii–xxxv.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. (2010). Nietzsche, Psychology, and First Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Plümacher, Olga (1888). Der Pessimismus in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart: Geschichtliches und Kritisches. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Georg Weiss.Google Scholar
Poellner, Peter (1995). Nietzsche and Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Elizabeth (1999). “Hume on the Generation of Motives: Why Beliefs Alone Never Motivate.” Hume Studies, 25 (1–2): 101122.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Elizabeth (2015). “Hume’s Psychology of the Passions: The Literature and Future Directions.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (4): 565606.Google Scholar
Ranisch, Robert and Sorgner, Stefan L. (eds.) (2014). Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH.Google Scholar
Reginster, Bernard (2006). The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Remhof, Justin (2018). “Nietzsche on Loneliness, Self-Transformation, and the Eternal Recurrence.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 49 (2): 194213.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Mattia (2015a). “Inner Opacity: Nietzsche on Introspection and Agency.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 58 (3): 221243.Google Scholar
Riccardi, Mattia (2015b). “Nietzsche on the Embodiment of Mind and Self.” In Nietzsche and the Problem of Subjectivity, eds. Constâncio, J., Mayer-Branco, M. J. and Ryan, B., 533549. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. (1996). Nietzsche’s System. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. (2004). Nietzsche’s New Darwinism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. (2006). “Nietzsche on Time and Becoming.” In A Companion to Nietzsche, ed. Ansell-Pearson, K., 208229. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. (2013). “Nietzsche on Life’s Ends.” In Gemes and Richardson (2013), 756–783.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. (2020), Nietzsche’s Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Margaret (1979). Parody/Metafiction: An Analysis of Parody as a Critical Mirror to the Writing and Reception of Fiction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rose, Margaret (1993). Parody: Ancient, Modern and Post-modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salaquarda, Jorg (1973). “Der Antichrist.” Nietzsche-Studien, 2: 91136.Google Scholar
Santaniello, Weaver (2018). Zarathustra’s Last Supper. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schaberg, William H. (1995). The Nietzsche Canon: A Publication History and Bibliography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schacht, Richard (1983). Nietzsche. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schacht, Richard (1991). “Zarathustra/Zarathustra as Educator.” In Nietzsche: A Critical Reader, ed. Sedgwick, P., 222249. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max (1994). Ressentiment. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1845). The Philosophical and Aesthetic Letters and Essays. London: John Chapman.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1851/1893). The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer: Studies in Pessimism (extracts from Parerga and Paralipomena), trans. Saunders, T. B.. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1947). Sämtliche Werke, Band 6: Parerga und Paralipomena II, ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Wiesbaden: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1969). The World as Will and Representation, trans. Payne, E. F. J., 2 vols. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1974). Parerga and Paralipomena, trans. Payne, E. F. J., 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1978). Gesammelte Briefe, ed. Hübscher, Arthur. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2009). On the Basis of Morals, trans. Janaway, C.. In The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2010). The World as Will and Representation, vol. 1, trans. Norman, J., Welchman, A., and Janaway, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2014). Parerga and Paralipomena, trans. S. Roehr and C. Janaway, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2015). Parerga and Paralipomena, trans. Del Caro, A. and Janaway, C., vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2018). The World as Will and Representation, vol. 2, trans. Norman, J., Welchman, A., and Janaway, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, John (2017). “What Is Philosophy as a Way of Life?Parrhesia, 28: 4056.Google Scholar
Seung, T. K. (2005). Nietzsche’s Epic of the Soul: Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Gary (1989). Nietzschean Narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Gary (2016). Nietzsche’s Earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Gary (2017). “Nietzsche and Anaximander: The Innocence of Becoming, or Life Without a Mortgage.” In Nietzsche and the Philosophers, ed. Conard, M. T., 86103. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra (2019). Reconstructing Schopenhauer’s Ethics: Hope, Compassion and Animal Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1920). Schopenhauer und Nietzsche: Ein Vortragszyklus. Zweite, unveränderte Auflage. Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1986). Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, trans. Loiskandl, H., Weinstein, D., and Weinstein, M.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sinhababu, Neil (2015). “Zarathustra’s Metaethics.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45 (3): 278299.Google Scholar
Sinhababu, Neil (2016). “Virtue, Desire, and Silencing Reasons.” In Questions of Character, ed. Fileva, I., 158168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinhababu, Neil (2017). Humean Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinhababu, Neil (2018). “Nietzsche’s Humean (all-too-Humean) Theory of Motivation.” In Katsafanas (2018a), 161–176.Google Scholar
Skowron, Michael (2004). “Zarathustra-Lehren. Übermensch, Wille zur Macht, Ewige Wiederkunft.” Nietzsche-Studien, 33: 6889.Google Scholar
Skowron, Michael (2013). “Posthuman oder Übermensch: War Nietzsche ein Transhumanist?Nietzsche-Studien, 42: 256282.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter (2013). Nietzsche Apostle. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Small, Robin (2010). Time and Becoming in Nietzsche’s Thought. London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Soll, Ivan (1973). “Reflections on Recurrence: A Re-Examination of Nietzsche’s Doctrine, Die Ewige Wiederkehr des Gleichen.” In Nietzsche: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Solomon, R., 322342. New York: Double Day Books.Google Scholar
Sorgner, Stefan L. (2017a). “Nietzsche, the Overhuman, and Transhumanism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 14–26.Google Scholar
Sorgner, Stefan L. (2017b). “Beyond Humanism: Reflections on Trans- and Posthumanism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 41–67.Google Scholar
Sorgner, Stefan L. (2017c). “Zarathustra 2.0 and Beyond: Further Remarks on the Complex Relationship between Nietzsche and Transhumanism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 136–169.Google Scholar
Sorgner, Stefan L. (2017d). “Immortality as Utopia and the Relevance of Nihilism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 248–261.Google Scholar
Werner, Stegmaier (2013). “Oh Mensch! Gieb Acht!: Kontextuelle Interpretation des Mitternachts-Lieds aus Also sprach Zarathustra.Nietzsche-Studien, 42: 85115.Google Scholar
Stern, Tom (2015a), ‘The Complications of Philosophy’, The Point, 10.Google Scholar
Stern, Tom (ed.) (2019a). The New Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Tom (2019b). “Nietzsche’s Ethics of Affirmation.” In Stern (2019a), 351–173.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (2017). On Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra, ed. Velkley, R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. (2000). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration: Expanded Edition with a New Introduction. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Swanton, Christine (2015). The Virtue Ethics of Hume & Nietzsche. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tanner, Michael (1994). Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tevenar, Gudrun von (2007). “Nietzsche’s Objections to Pity and Compassion.” In Nietzsche and Ethics, ed. von Tevenar, G., 263282. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tevenar, Gudrun von (2013). “Zarathustra: ‘That Malicious Dionysian.’” In Gemes and Richardson (2013), 272–297.Google Scholar
Tevenar, Gudrun von (2019). “Nietzsche on Nausea.” The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 50 (1): 5878.Google Scholar
Thompson, Allan (2017). “Anthropocentrism: The Peril and Promise of Humanity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, eds. Gardner, S. and Thompson, A., 7790. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuncel, Yunus (ed.) (2017a). Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Tuncel, Yunus (2017b). “The Question of Pain and Suffering in Nietzsche and Transhumanism.” In Tuncel (2017a), 220–230.Google Scholar
Ure, Michael (2018). “Nietzsche’s Ethics of Self-Cultivation and Eternity.” In Ethics and Self-Cultivation: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, eds. Dennis, M. and Werkhoven, S., 84104. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ure, Michael (2019). Nietzsche's The Gay Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David (2006). Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay. (2013). The View from Here. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Koral (2008). Augenblick: The Concept of the “Decisive Moment” in 19th- and 20th-Century Western Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark (1991). Nietzsche and Political Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Mark (2004). “Beyond a Joke: Nietzsche and the Birth of ‘Super-Laughter’The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 27: 117.Google Scholar
Weichelt, Hans (1910). Friedrich Nietzsche: Also sprach Zarathustra. Erklärt und gewürdigt. Leipzig: Dürr’schen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Welshon, Rex (2004). The Philosophy of Nietzsche. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
White, Richard (1997). Nietzsche and the Problem of Sovereignty. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North (1978). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, eds. Griffin, D. R. and Sherburne, D. W.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (2001). “Introduction.” In GS (2001), vii–xxii.Google Scholar
Wirth, Jason (2005). “Nietzsche’s Joy. On Laughter’s Truth.” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 10 (1): 117139.Google Scholar
Woodward, Ashley (2017). “Postmodern Reflections on the Nietzsche and Transhumanism Exchange.” In Tuncel (2017a), 231–247.Google Scholar
Wotling, Patrick (2020). “Enjoying Riddles: Epicurus as a Forerunner of the Idea of Gay Science?” In Nietzsche and Epicurus: Nature, Health and Ethics, eds. Acharya, V. and Johnson, R. J., 159172. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Young, Julian (2010). Friedrich Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Gabriel (2015a). “What Zarathustra Whispers.” Nietzsche-Studien, 44: 231266.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Gabriel (2012). “The Relation between Sovereignty and Guilt in Nietzsche’s Genealogy.” European Journal of Philosophy, 20 (S1): 107142.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Gabriel (2015b). “Life, Death, and Eternal Recurrence in Nietzsche’s Zarathustra.” The Agonist: A Nietzsche Circle Journal, 8 (2): 6980.Google Scholar
Zavatta, Benedetta (2019). Individuality and Beyond. Nietzsche reads Emerson. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zavatta, Benedetta (2021, forthcoming). “Nietzsche e a arte da sátira (Nietzsche e Mark Twain).” In Nietzsche e as Artes, eds. Constâncio, J. and Mayer Branco, M. J.. Lisboa: Edições Cotovia.Google Scholar
Zittel, Claus (2011). Das ästethische Kalkül von Friedrich Nietzsches Also Sprach Zarathustra. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keith Ansell-Pearson, University of Warwick, Paul S. Loeb, University of Puget Sound, Washington
  • Book: Nietzsche's ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra'
  • Online publication: 09 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108855143.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keith Ansell-Pearson, University of Warwick, Paul S. Loeb, University of Puget Sound, Washington
  • Book: Nietzsche's ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra'
  • Online publication: 09 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108855143.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keith Ansell-Pearson, University of Warwick, Paul S. Loeb, University of Puget Sound, Washington
  • Book: Nietzsche's ‘Thus Spoke Zarathustra'
  • Online publication: 09 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108855143.013
Available formats
×