Adorno, Theodor Wiesengrund. 1993. Three Studies on Hegel [1943]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Allison, David B. 1993. “Nietzsche’s Identity.” In The Fate of the New Nietzsche, ed. Ansell-Pearson., Keith Aldershot: Avebury. 15–42.Google Scholar

Amery, Jean. 1980. At the Mind’s Limit, trans. Sydney Rosenfeld and Stella Rosenfeld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Anon, . 1900. “Nécrologie. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900).” Revue de métaphysique et de morale vol. 8, September 1900, supplement 1, p. 13.Google Scholar

Ansell-Pearson, Keith. 2021. “How to Make Sense of Nietzsche As a Sceptic.” In Nietzsche on Making Sense of Nietzsche, ed. Beland Martine, Dana, Denat, Céline, Piazzesi, Chiara, and Wotling, Patrick. Reims: Editions et presses de l’université de Reims. 71–93.Google Scholar

Appel, Sabine. 1995. Naivität und Lebenskunst: Die Idee der Synthese von Leben und Geist in Thomas Manns Hochstapler-Memoiren. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1971. The Life of the Mind. 2 vols. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 2007. “Great Friend of Reality: Adalbert Stifter.” In Reflections on Literature and Culture, ed. Young-Ah Gottlieb, Susannah. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 110–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariew, Roger. 1992. “Descartes and the Tree of Knowledge.” Synthese vol. 92, no. 1: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, . 1882. On the Parts of the Animals, trans. William Ogle. London: Kegan Paul & Trench.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2016. De anima, trans. Christopher Shields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Michel. 1900. “Frédéric Nietzsche.” La Revue blanche vol. 23, September 15: 113–121.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Michel. 1902. “André Gide: L’immoraliste.” La Revue blanche vol. 29, November 15: 470–474.Google Scholar

Aschheim, Steven. 1994. The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany 1890–1990. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Babich, Babette E. 2006. “The Genealogy of Morals and Right Reading: On the Nietzschean Aphorism and the Art of Polemic.” In Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays, ed. Acampora, Christa Davis. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield. 177–190.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bambach, Charles. 2010. “Nietzsche’s Madman Parable: A Cynical Reading.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly vol. 84, no. 2: 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barish, Jonas A. 1966. “The Antitheatrical Prejudice.” Critical Quarterly vol. 8, no. 4: 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1983. “Aphorism and Argument.” In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, Kevin. La Salle, IL: Hegeler Institute. 91–107.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan. 2009. Soul of the Age: The Life, Mind and World of William Shakespeare. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Baumbach, Manuel, ed. 2022. Cento-Texts in the Making: Aesthetics and Poetics of Cento-Techniques from Homer to Zong! Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst. 1996. “Nietzsche in the Twentieth Century.” In The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, ed. Magnus, Bernd and Marie Higgins, Kathleen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 281–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belaval, Yvon. 1973. “Le siècle des Lumières.” In Histoire de la philosophie. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar

Benne, Christian. 2015. Nietzsche und die historisch-kritische Philologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Benne, Christian, and Zittel, Claus, eds. 2017. Nietzsche und die Lyrik: Ein Kompendium. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernays, Jacob. 1850. “Heraklitische Studien.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 7: 90–116 (also in Jacob Bernays, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, ed. Hermann Usener, Berlin 1885, vol. 2, 37–64).Google Scholar

Berry, Jessica N. 2010. Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, Thomas. 2009. The Sacred Universe: Earth, Spirituality and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bertram, Ernst. 1907. Studien zu Adalbert Stifters Novellentechnik. Dortmund: Fr. Wilh. Ruhfus.Google Scholar

Bertram, Ernst. 2009. Nietzsche: Attempt at a Mythology, trans. Robert E. Norton. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Best, Stephen. 2018. None Like Us: Blackness, Belonging, Aesthetic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackhall, Eric A. 1948. Adalbert Stifter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice. 1949. La part du Feu. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Blanchot, Maurice. [1969] 1993. The Infinite Conversation, trans. Susan Hanon. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 82. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Bloch, Peter André. 2002. “Gide, disciple de Nietzsche, face au nihilisme européen.” In André Gide et la tentation de la modernité, ed. Kopp, Robert and Schnyder, Peter, Paris: Gallimard. 130–153.Google Scholar

Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, Harold. 1982. Agon: Towards a Theory of Revisionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold. 2020. Take Arms against the Sea of Troubles. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Blum, Léon. 1962. “A Theoretical Outline of ‘Beylism.’” In Stendhal: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Brombert., Victor Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 101–114.Google Scholar

Bouveresse, Jacques. 2006. “Défendre la vérité désarmée.” Interview, Nouveaux regards. http://pmsimonin.fr/lexique/2008/laicite/bouveresse2.htm.Google Scholar

Bouveresse, Jacques. 2016. Nietzsche contre Foucault: Sur la vérité, la connaissance et le pouvoir. Marseille: Agone.Google Scholar

Bouvier, David, and Dasen, Véronique, eds. 2020. Héraclite: Le temps est un enfant qui joue, Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Božovič, Miran. 2018. “Diderot on Nature and Pantomime.” European Legacy vol. 23, no. 6: 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branham, R. Bracht. 1996. “Defacing the Currency: Diogenes’ Rhetoric and the Invention of Cynicism.” In The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, ed. Branham, Robert Bracht and Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile. Berkeley: University of California Press. 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branham, R. Bracht. 2004. “Nietzsche’s Cynicism: Uppercase or Lowercase?” In Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition, ed. Bishop, Paul. Rochester, NY: Camden House. 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bremer, Dieter. 1999. “Die Spannung von Nähe und Ferne in Nietzsches Auseinandersetzung mit Heraklit und Platon.” In “Jedes Wort ist ein Vorurteil”: Philologie und Philosophie in Nietzsches Denken, ed. Riedel, Manfred. Cologne: Bölhau. 191–206.Google Scholar

Bruford, Walter H. 1975. The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation: “Bildung” from Humboldt to Thomas Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. 1960. Institutes of the Christian Religion, Vol. 1, ed. McNeill, John T., trans. Ford Lewis Battles. Louisville, KY: Westminster Press.Google Scholar

Came, Daniel. 2013. “The Themes of Affirmation and Illusion in The Birth of Tragedy and Beyond.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 209–225.Google Scholar

Carson, Rachel. 2022. Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. 2020. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms [Philosophie der symbolischen Formen]. Berlin: B. Cassirer, 1923], Vol. 1, trans. Steve G. Lofts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. 2005. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Maudemarie. 1991. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Maudemarie. 1997. “From the Nietzsche Archive: Concerning the Aphorism Explicated in ‘Genealogy’ III.” Journal of the History of Philosophy vol. 35, no. 4 (October): 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Maudemarie, and Dudrick, David. 2012. The Soul of Nietzsche’s “Beyond Good and Evil.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Maudemarie, and Dudrick, David. 2013. “Beyond Good and Evil.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clemens, Justin. 2020. “Critique This.” Overland, no. 238: 15–19.Google Scholar

Coccia, Emmanuele. 2018. The Life of Plants: A Metaphysics of Mixture. London: Polity.Google Scholar

Colin, René-Pierre. 1979. Schopenhauer en France. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Compagnon, Antoine. 1989. Proust entre deux siècles. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C. 1965. Nietzsche As Philosopher. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Darlu, Alphonse. 1899. “Classification des idées morales du temps présent.” Revue bleue vol. 11, no. 10 (March 11): 289–296.Google Scholar

Deacy, Susan. 2008. Athena. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del Caro, Adrian. 2004. Grounding the Nietzsche Rhetoric of Earth. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and Philosophy, trans. Hugh Tomlinson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1997. Essays Critical and Clinical, trans. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1971. “La mythologie blanche: la métaphore dans le texte philosophique.” Poetique vol. 5: 1–52.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1974. Glas. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Spurs: Nietzsche’s Styles, trans. Barbara Harlow. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1984. Otobiographies: L’enseignement de Nietzsche et la politique du nom propre. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1985. The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1995. The Gift of Death, trans. David Wills. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews, 1971–2001. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2007. “Introduction.” In Selected Writings, ed. Kofman, Sarah. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2019. La vie la mort (Séminaire 1975/1976). Paris: Éditions du Seuil (Life/Death, trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1973–6. Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1983. Principles of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 2006. A Discourse on the Method, trans. Ian Maclean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. 1800. Œuvres, Vol. 14, ed. Naigeon, Jacques-André. Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar

Diderot, Denis. 1966. Rameau’s Nephew and D’Alembert’s Dream, trans. Leonard Tancock. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann. 1901 (1909²). Herakleitos von Ephesos, Griechisch und Deutsch. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann. 1902. “Wissenschaft und Romantik.” Sitzungsberichte der königichen-preussischen Akademie zu Berlin vol. 4: 25–43.Google Scholar

Diels, Hermann, and Kranz, Walter. 1952. Die Fragmente Der Vorsokratiker, Griechisch und Deutsch.Berlin: Weidmann (= DK).Google Scholar

Dilcher, Roman. 1995. Studies in Heraclitus. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar

Donnellan, Brendan. 1982. Nietzsche and the French Moralists. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Downing, Eric. 1993. Artificial I’s: The Self As Artwork in Ovid, Kierkegaard, and Thomas Mann. Tubingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drabinski, John E. 2012. “Affect and Revolution: On Baldwin and Fanon.” Phaenex: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture vol. 7, no.2: 124–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drapela, Nathan. 2020. “A Matter of Taste: Nietzsche and the Structure of Affective Response.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy vol. 63, no. 1: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, Robert. 1892a. “La Philosophie du Marteau.” Le Banquet, no. 3 (May): 65–74.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Robert. 1892b. “Frédéric Nietzsche et Peter Gast.” Le Banquet, no. 6 November: 161–167.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2000. “The Poet.” In The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Atkinson, Brooks. New York: Modern Library. 287–307.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2003. “Beauty.” In The Conduct of Life., ed. Packer, Barbara L., Slater, Joseph, and Wilson, Douglas Emory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 149–164.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 2010. “Poetry and Imagination.” In Letters and Social Aims, ed. Meyerson, Joel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1–42.Google Scholar

Fantino, Enrica, Muss, Ulrike, Schubert, Charlotte, and Sier, Kurt, eds. 2017. Heraklit im Kontext. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Féré, Charles. 1888. Dégénérescence et criminalité. Essai physiologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2011. “Genealogy and Morality.” American Dialectic vol. 1, no. 3: 346–69.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2020. “Romanticism and The Birth of Tragedy.” In Romanticism, Philosophy, and Literature, ed. Forster, Michael N. and Steiner, Lina. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2022. “Nietzsche: Three Genealogies of Christianity.” Genealogy 6/38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N. Forthcoming. “Skepticism about Logic in Germany at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century.” In The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Analytic Philosophy, ed. Conant, James and Held, Jonas. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1984. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” In The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul. New York: Pantheon. 76–100.Google Scholar

Fouillée, Alfred. 1902. Nietzsche et l’immoralisme. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Fraisse, Luc. 2013. L’Éclectisme philosophique de Marcel Proust. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Franz, Michael. 2017. “Heraklit und das Artemision. Die Erfindung eines neutralen Standpunkts in der Politik.”In Heraklit im Kontext, ed. Fantino, Enrica, Muss, Ulrike, Schubert, Charlotte, and Sier, Kurt. Berlin: De Gruyter. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick, Samuel. 2012. Narratives Unsettled: Digression in Robert Walser, Thomas Bernhard, and Adalbert Stifter. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Fromm, Erich. 1960. The Sane Society. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1986. “Poetry and Mimesis” and “Philosophy and Poetry.” In The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays, ed. Bernasconi, Robert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 116–123 and 131–140.Google Scholar

Gagliano, Monica, Ryan, John C., and Vieira, Patricia I., eds. 2017. The Language of Plants: Science, Philosophy, Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. 2013. “Nietzsche’s Philosophical Aestheticism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Gaultier, Jules. 2006 (1902). Le Bovarysme. Essai sur le pouvoir d’imaginer. Reprint ed. Buvik, Per. Paris: Presses de l’Université de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

de Gaultier, Jules. 2007 (1892). Le Bovarysme: La psychologie dans l’œuvre de Flaubert. Reprint ed. Buvik, Per. Paris: Éditions du Sandre.Google Scholar

Gemes, Ken, and Janaway, Chris. 2006. “Nietzsche on Free Will, Autonomy and the Sovereign Individual.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supp. Vols., vol. 80.Google Scholar

George, Stefan. 1907 (1901). “Nietzsche.” In Blätter für die Kunst. Berlin: Blaetter für die Kunst.Google Scholar

Germana, Michael. 2017. Ralph Ellison, Temporal Technologist. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghosh, Amitav. 2022. The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gide, André. 1997. Journal, II, 1926–1950, ed. Sagaert, Martine. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar

Gide, André. 1999. “Lettre à Angèle [VI] Friedrich Nietzsche.” In Essais critiques, ed. Masson, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade. 34–43.Google Scholar

Gide, André. 2001 (1924). “Si le grain ne meurt.” In Souvenirs et voyages, ed. Masson, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar

Gilman, Sander L. 1976. “Parody and Parallel: Heine, Nietzsche, and the Classical World.” In Studies in Nietzsche and the Classical Tradition, ed. O’Flaherty, James C., Sellner, Timothy F., and Helm, Robert Meredith. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 199–213.Google Scholar

Gilman, Sander L., Blair, Carole, and Parent, David J., eds. 1989. Friedrich Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gilman, Sander L., and Reichenbach, Ingeborg. 1985. Begegnungen mit Nietzsche. 2nd rev. ed. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Golomb, Jacob. 1997. Nietzsche and Jewish Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gooding-Williams, Robert. 2001. Zarathustra’s Dionysian Modernism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gooding-Williams, Robert. 2006. “Foreword: Supposing Nietzsche to Be Black. What Then?” In Critical Affinities: Nietzsche and African American Thought, ed. Scott, Jacqueline and Franklin, A. Todd. Ithaca: State University of New York Press. vii–xviii.Google Scholar

Gori, Pietro. 2019. Nietzsche’s Pragmatism: A Study on Perspectival Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, Herbert. 2004. “Argumentation and Heraclitus’ Book.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy vol. 26: 1–17.Google Scholar

Grätz, Katharina, and Kaufmann, Sebastian. 2017. Nietzsche als Dichter: Lyrik Poetologie-Rezeption. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grundlehner, Philip. 1986. The Poetry of Friedrich Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2021. Prose of the World: Denis Diderot and the Periphery of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gump, Margaret. 1974. Adalbert Stifter. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar

Gusman, Simon. 2022. “The Secret Smiles of Things: Sartre’s Realism Reconsidered.” Human Studies, no. 45: 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hackett, Helen. 2022. The Elizabethan Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Häfner, Ralph, Kaufmann, Sebastian, and Sommer, Andreas Urs, eds. 2019. Nietzsches Literaturen. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halévy, Daniel, and Gregh, Fernand. 1892. “Frédéric Nietzsche.” Le Banquet, no. 2 (April): 33–35.Google Scholar

Hall, Michael. 2011. Plants and Persons: A Philosophical Botany. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamlyn, David. 1999. “Schopenhauer and Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer, ed. Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammerschlag, Sarah. 2010. The Figural Jew: Politics and Identity in Postwar French Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammerschlag, Sarah. 2016. Broken Tablets: Levinas, Derrida and the Literary Afterlife of Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatab, Lawrence J. 2018. “What Kind of Text Is Zarathustra?” The Agonist vol. 11, no. 2. Spring. https://agonist.nietzschecircle.com/wp/what-kind-of-text-is-zarathustra-by-lawrence-j-hatab.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. 1928–1941. Sämtliche Werke. Jubiläumausgabe in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Glockner, Hermann. Stuttgart: Fromman.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1961. Nietzsche. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1967. “Who Is Nietzsche’s Zarathustra?” Review of Metaphysics vol. 20, no. 3 (March).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Nietzsche, Vols. 1 and 2, trans. David Farrell Krell. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1998. Pathmarks, ed. McNeill, William. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, Erich. 1988. “Rilke and Nietzsche with a Discourse on Thought, Belief and Poetry.” In Heller, Erich, The Importance of Nietzsche: Ten Essays. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 87–127.Google Scholar

Hemsterhuis, François. 2010. Ma toute chère Diotime: Lettres à la princesse de Gallitzin, 1785, ed. van Sluis, Jacob. Berltsum: Van Sluis.Google Scholar

Henry, Anne, ed. 1989. Schopenhauer et la création littéraire en Europe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Higgins, Kathleen Marie. 1987. Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, Kevin R. 2003. Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundation of His Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobson, Marian, ed. 2013. Denis Diderot, Satyre seconde: Le Neveu de Rameau. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar

Hobson, Marian, ed. 2016. Denis Diderot, Rameau’s Nephew: A Multi-media Bilingual Edition, trans. Kate E. Tunstall and Caroline Warman. Cambridge: Open Book.Google Scholar

Höfele, Andreas. 2016. “Nietzsche’s Shakespeare.” In Höfele, Andreas, No Hamlets: German Shakespeare from Nietzsche to Carl Schmitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollander, Dana. 2008. Exemplarity and Choseness: Rosenzweig and Derrida on the Nation of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hölscher, Uvo. 1968. Anfängliches Fragen: Studien zur frühen griechischen Philosophie. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht [Extracts from sections II and IV of the chapter on Heraclitus (“Orakel-Stil,” pp. 136–141, “Gleichnis und Spruchform,” pp. 144–149) are translated in Alexander P. D. Mourelatos, ed. The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 229–239, under the title “Paradox, Simile and Gnomic Utterance in Heraclitus.”]Google Scholar

Hölscher, Uvo. 1979. “Die Wiedergewinnung des Antiken Bodens: Nietzsches Rückgriff auf Heraklit.” Neue Hefte für Philosophie vol. 15, no. 16: 156–182.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cumming. New York: Continuum (1st ed. 1944).Google Scholar

Humphries, Jefferson. 1987. The Puritan and the Cynic: Moralists and Theorists in French and American Letters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, Richard. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hussain, Nadeem J. Z. 2004. “Nietzsche’s Positivism.” European Journal of Philosophy vol. 12, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, Drew A. 1997. “Caring for Myth: Heidegger, Plato and the Myth of Cura.” Research in Phenomenology vol. 27: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janaway, Christopher. 1997. “Nietzsche’s Illustration of the Art of Exegesis.” European Journal of Philosophy vol. 5, no. 3: 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janaway, Christopher. 2009. “Plato and the Arts.” In A Companion to Plato, ed. Benson, Hugh H.. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. 388–401.Google Scholar

Jardine, Alice, and Menke, Anne, eds. 1991. Shifting Scenes: Interviews on Women, Politics and Writing. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Jarrety, Michel. 1991. Valéry devant la littérature: Mesure de la limite. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Jauss, Hans Robert. 1983. The Dialogical and the Dialectical Neveu de Rameau: How Diderot Adopted Socrates and Hegel Adopted Diderot. Protocol of the Forty-Fifth Colloquy, 27 February 1983, ed. Herzog, William R. II. Berkeley, CA: Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture.Google Scholar

Jensen, Anthony K. 2004. “Nietzsche’s Unpublished Fragments on Ancient Cynicism: The First Night of Diogenes.” In Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition, ed. Bishop, Paul. Rochester, NY: Camden House. 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, Milbank, ‘Can Morality be Christian’, The Word Made Strange (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), 219–32.Google Scholar

John, Milbank, “Sublimity: The Modern Transcendent,” in Transcendence ed. Regina Schwartz (London: Routledge, 2004), 211–234Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark and Lakoff, George. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. 1985. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. 1988. Nietzsche’s Zarathustra, Vol. 1, ed. Jarrett, James L.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, Walter. 1968. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Walter. 1980. “Nietzsche and Rilke” and “Philosophy versus Poetry.” In Kaufmann, Walter, From Shakespeare to Existentialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 219–241 and 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, Walter, ed. 1989. Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar

Klonosky, Richard J. 1984. “Being and Time Said All at Once: An Analysis of Section 42.” Tulane Studies in Philosophy vol. 32: 62–68.Google Scholar

Klossowski, Pierre. 1963. “Nietzsche, le polythéisme et la parodie.” in Un si funeste désir, ed. Klossowski, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard. 173–212.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1983. Nietzsche et la métaphore. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1986a. Nietzsche et la scène philosophique. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1986b. Pourquoi rit-on? Freud et le mot d’ésprit. Paris : Galilée.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1987. “Nietzsche and the Obscurity of Heraclitus.” Diacritics vol. 17, no. 3: 39–55 (trans. Françoise Lionnet-McCumber; French original in Sarah Kofman. 1990. Séductions. De Sartre à Héraclite. Paris: Galilée. 89–137).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1990. “Conversions: The Merchant of Venice under the Sign of Saturn.” In Literary Theory Today, ed. Collier, Peter and Geyer-Ryan., Helga Cambridge: Polity Press. 142–166.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1993a. Explosions II. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1993b. Nietzsche and Metaphor, trans. Duncan Large. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1994a. Le Mepris des Juifs: Nietzsche, les Juifs, l’Antisemitisme. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1994b. Rue Ordener, Rue Labat. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1994c. “Les mains d’Antelme: Post-Scriptum à Paroles suffoquées.” Lignes, no. 21: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 1998. Smothered Words, trans. Madeleine Dobie. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Kofman, Sarah. 2007. Selected Writings, ed. Albrecht, Thomas, Albert, Georgia, and Rottenberg, Elizabeth G.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kovari, Sarolta. 2018. “Nietzsche, Gerber und die Frage nach der Sprache.” Nagyerdei Almanach vol. 1, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. 1991. Strangers to Ourselves, trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. 1993. The Subject of Philosophy, ed. Trezise, Thomas, trans. Thomas Trezise, Hugh J. Silverman, Gary M. Cole, Timothy D. Bent, Karen McPherson, and Claudett Sartiliot. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 83. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Laks, André. 2007. “Écriture et prose: un autre récit des débuts de la philosophie grecque.” In Histoire, Doxographie, Vérité. Études sur Aristote, Théophraste et la philosophie présocratique, ed. Laks, André. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. 167–179.Google Scholar

Laks, André. 2011. “L’Héraclite physicien de Schleiermacher.” In The Presocratics from the Latin Middle Ages to Hermann Diels, ed. Primavesi, Oliver and Luchner, Katarina. Stuttgart: Steiner. 281–309.Google Scholar

Laks, André, and Most, Glenn W.. 2016. Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (=LM). [Heraclitus in Vol. III/2, Early Ionian Thinkers].Google Scholar

Lamb, Peter, and London, Douglas Burnham. 2019. The First Marx: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Lampert, Laurence. 1986. Nietzsche’s Teaching: An Interpretation of Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Large, Duncan. 2001. Nietzsche and Proust: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Large, Duncan. 2013. “Nietzsche et compagnie: La pluralisation de la première personne.” In Nietzsche, un art nouveau du discours, ed. Denat, Céline and Wotling, Patrick. Reims: EPURE, Éditions et Presses universitaires de Reims. 103–125.Google Scholar

Large, Duncan. 2017. “‘Lorenz Sterne’ among German Philosophers: Reception and Influence.” Textual Practice vol. 31, no. 2: 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Lawrence, D. H. 2019. “Poetry of the Present.” In Life with a Capital L. Essays chosen by Geoff Dyer. London: Penguin. 77–83.Google Scholar

Le Rider, Jacques. 1999. Nietzsche en France, de la fin du XIXe siècle au temps présent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Le Rider, Jacques. 2005. “Gabriel Monod.” In Malwida von Meysenbug. Une Européenne du XIXe siècle, ed. Le Rider, Jacques. Paris: Bartillat. 301–351.Google Scholar

Le Rider, Jacques. 2017a. “Proust et Nietzsche.” Revue d’études proustiennes vol. 5, no. 1: 209–234.Google Scholar

Le Rider, Jacques, ed. 2017b. Nietzsche dans la littérature française au tournant du XIXe et du XXe siècle, in Cahiers de l’Association internationale des études françaises no. 69, May.Google Scholar

Le Verrier, Charles. 1901. “Nietzsche.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale vol. 9 (January): 70–99.Google Scholar

Lecznar, Adam. 2020. Dionysus after Nietzsche: The Birth of Tragedy in Twentieth-Century Literature and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leiter, Brian. 2002. Nietzsche on Morality. 2nd rev. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lemm, Vanessa. 2009. Nietzsche’s Animal Philosophy: Culture, Politics and the Animality of the Human Being. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Lemm, Vanessa, ed. 2015. Nietzsche and the Becoming of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Lemm, Vanessa. 2020. Homo Natura: Nietzsche, Philosophical Anthropology and Biopolitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Lemm, Vanessa. 2021. “The Work of Art and the Death of God in Nietzsche and Agamben.” In Agamben and the Existentialists, ed. Dickinson, Colby and Norris, Marcos. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 83–99.Google Scholar

Lemm, Vanessa. 2022. “Posthumanism and Plant Studies.” In Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, ed. Herbrechter, Stefan, Callus, Ivan, Rossini, Manuela, Grech, Marija, de Bruin-Molé, Megen, and Müller, Christopher John. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Leopold, Aldo. 2020. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lepenies, Wolf. 1985. Die drei Kulturen: Soziologie zwischen Literatur und Wissenschaft. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1934. “Quelques réflexions sur la philosophie de l’hitlérisme” re in Les imprévus de l’histoire. Paris: Fata Morgana. 27–41.Google Scholar

Loeb, Paul. S. 2018. “Nietzsche’s Futurism.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies vol. 49, no. 2: 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovin, Clifford R. 1967. “Blut und Boden: The Ideological Basis of the Nazi Agricultural Program.” Journal of the History of Ideas vol. 28, no. 2: 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löwith, Karl. 1933. “Kierkegaard und Nietzsche.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte vol. 11: 43–66.Google Scholar

Löwith, Karl. 1967. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Magnus, Bernd, Stewart, Stenley, and Mileur, Jean-Pierre. 1993. Nietzsche’s Case: Philosophy as/and Literature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

de Man, Paul. 1979. Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

de Man, Paul. 1983. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Introduction. Wlad Godzich. Theory and History of Literature, Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. 1969. Confessions of Felix Krull Confidence Man (The Early Years), trans. Denver Lindley. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. 1975. Letters of Thomas Mann 1889–1955, trans. Richard Winston and Clara Winston. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. 1989. “Felix Krull.” In Death in Venice and Seven Other Stories, trans. Helen T. Lowe-Porter. New York: Vintage. 359–402.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. 1990a. “[Der autobiographische Roman].” In Mann, Thomas, Gesammelte Werke in Dreizehn Bänden. 13 vols. Frankfurt: Fischer. 11:700–703.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. 1990b. “Bekenntnisse des Hochstaplers Felix Krull.” In Mann, Thomas, Gesammelte Werke in Dreizehn Bänden. 13 vols. Frankfurt: Fischer. 7:263–661.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas. 1990c. “Nietzsche’s Philosophie im Lichte unserer Erfahrung.” In Mann, Thomas, Gesammelte Werke in Dreizehn Bänden. 13 vols. Frankfurt: Fischer. 9:675–713.Google Scholar

Manolescu, Georges. 1905. Ein Fürst der Diebe: Memoiren. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar

Manolescu, Georges. 1906. Gescheitert: Aus dem Seelenleben eines Verbrechers. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, Jaap. 1992. Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos As a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marder, Michael. 2013. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc. 1999. Cartesian Questions: Method and Metaphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. 1975. Early Writings, ed. Colletti, Lucio. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. 2015. “Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception.” Ergo vol. 2, no. 29: 737–777.Google Scholar

Mauldon, Margaret, trans. 2008. Denis Diderot, Rameau’s Nephew, and, First Satire. Introduction and notes by Nicholas Cronk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mayfield, D. S. 2015. Artful Immorality – Variants of Cynicism: Machiavelli, Gracián, Diderot, Nietzsche. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGill, Scott. 2005. Virgil Recomposed: The Mythological and Secular Centos of Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meijers, Anthonie. 1988. “Gustav Gerber und Friedrich Nietzsche.” Nietzsche Studien 17.Google Scholar

Melville, Herman. 2018. “Hawthorne and His Mosses.” Moby-Dick, ed. Parker, Hershel. New York: Norton. 544–559.Google Scholar

Mendes-Flohr, Paul. 1997. “Zarathustra’s Apostle: Martin Buber and the Jewish Renaissance.” In Nietzsche and Jewish Culture, ed. Golomb, Jacob. London: Routledge. 233–243.Google Scholar

Merchant, Carolyn. 2006. “The Scientific Revolution and The Death of Nature.” Isis, no. 97: 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merimée, Prosper. 1989. “The Etruscan Vase.” In Carmen and Other Stories, trans. Nicholas Jotcham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 93–116.Google Scholar

Michaelis, Paul. 1886. “Rev. of Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse.” Berlin National-Zeitung vol. 39, no. 672 (December): 1–2.Google Scholar

Middleton, Christopher. 1996. Selected Letters of Friedrich Nietzsche. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Monod, Gabriel. 1897. “Enquête sur l’influence de Taine, 1828–1893: Quelques opinions sur l’œuvre de Taine.” La Revue blanche vol. 13 (January): 263–295.Google Scholar

Montinari, Mazzino. 2003. Reading Nietzsche, trans. Greg Whitlock. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

More, Nicholas D. 2014. Nietzsche’s Last Laugh: Ecce Homo As Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morland, Jacques. 1902. “Enquête sur l’influence allemande.” Mercure de France vol. 44, no. 155 (November): 328–332.Google Scholar

Mornet, Daniel. 1927. “La véritable signification du ‘Neveu de Rameau.’” Revue des deux mondes vol. 40, no. 4: 881–908.Google Scholar

Morrison, Toni. 1989. “Unspeakable Things Unspoken: The Afro-American Presence in American Literature.” Michigan Quarterly Review vol. 28, no. 1: 1–34.Google Scholar

Mouraviev, Serge. 2003. Heraclitea III/1 Recensio: Memoria. Testimonia de Vita, Morte ac Scripto. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar

Mouraviev, Serge. 2011. Heraclitea IVA. Refectio. Liber a nobis restitutus. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar

Müller-Lauter, Wolfgang. 1971. Nietzsche: Seine Philosophie der Gegensätze und die Gegensätze seiner Philosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nathan, Emmanuel, and Topolski, Anna, eds. 2016. Is There a Judeo-Christian Tradition? A European Perspective. Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts, Vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nealon, Jeff T. 2016. Plant Theory: Biopower and Vegetable Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Nectoux, Jean-Michel. 1999. “Miroirs de Vinteuil. Portrait de l’artiste en mélomane.” In Marcel Proust: L’écriture et les arts, ed. Tadié, Jean-Yves and Callu, Florence. Paris: Gallimard. 43–53.Google Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander. 1981. “‘Getting Used to Not Getting Used to It’: Nietzsche in The Magic Mountain.” Philosophy and Literature vol. 5, no. 1: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nehamas, Alexander. 1985. Nietzsche: Life As Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ngai, Sianne. 2020. Theory of the Gimmick: Aesthetic Judgement and Captialist Form. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich. 1979. Der Kynismus des Diogenes und der Begriff des Zynismus. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich. 1980. “Der ‘Kurze Weg’: Nietzsches ‘Cynismus.’” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte vol. 24, no. 1: 103–122.Google Scholar

Niehues-Pröbsting, Heinrich. 1996. “The Modern Reception of Cynicism: Diogenes in the Enlightenment.” In The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, ed. Branham, Robert Bracht and Goulet-Cazé, Marie-Odile. Berkeley: University of California Press. 329–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nola, Robert, and Sankey, Howard. 2014. Theories of Scientific Method: An Introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, Jana. 2021. Posthuman Legal Subjectivity: Reimagining the Human in the Anthropocene. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Marcos Antonio. 2018. “Existential Choice As Repressed Theism: Jean-Paul Sartre and Giorgio Agamben in Conversation.” Religions vol. 9, no. 106: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okiji, Fumi. 2018. Jazz As Critique: Adorno and Black Expression Revisited. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Oliver, Kelly. 1993. “A Dagger through the Heart: The Ethics of Reading Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals.” International Studies in Philosophy vol. 25: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliver, Kelly. 2015. Earth and World: Philosophy after the Apollo Missions. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paz, Octavio. 1973. The Bow and the Lyre, trans. Ruth L. C. Simms. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Pearson, Roger. 1988. Stendhal’s Violin: A Novelist and His Reader. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry, trans. 2018. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pinto, Louis. 1995. Les Neveux de Zarathoustra: La réception de Nietzsche en France. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Poe, Edgar Allan. 1986. “Philosophy of Composition.” The Fall of the House of Usher & Other Writings, ed. Galloway, David. London: Penguin. 430–443.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 1998. “Unconscious Agency in Nietzsche.” Nietzsche-Studien vol. 27: 153–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, James I. 2000a. The Invention of Dionysus: An Essay on “The Birth of Tragedy”. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 2000b. Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 2010a. “Nietzsche, Rhetoric, Philology.” In Philology and Its Histories, ed. Gurd, Sean. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. 164–191.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 2010b. “Theater of the Absurd: Nietzsche’s Genealogy As Cultural Critique.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly vol. 84, no. 2: 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, James I. 2012. “Nietzsche’s Genealogy As Performative Critique.” In Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, ed. Boer, Karin de and Sonderegger, Ruth. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 2018. “Untimely Philology: Nietzsche, Classics, and Modernity.” In A New Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche, ed. Stern, Tom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 2022. “How Ideal Is the Ancient Self?” In The Possibility for Idealism in the 21st Century, ed. Kroupa, Gregor andSimonti, Jure. Berlin: De Gruyter. 3–26.Google Scholar

de Pourtalès, Guy. 1991. Journal II: 1919–1941. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 1971. Contre Sainte-Beuve précédé de Pastiches et mélanges suivi de Essais et articles, ed. Clarac, Pierre. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 1978. Correspondance de Marcel Proust. Tome IV: 1904, ed. Kolb, Philip. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 1988. À la recherche du temps perdu, ed. Tadié, Jean-Yves, Vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 2002. Carnets, ed. Callu, Florence and Compagnon, Antoine. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 2003a. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 2: In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. James Grieve. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 2003b. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 3: The Guermantes Way, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. Mark Treharne. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 2003c. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 5: The Prisoner and The Fugitive, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. Carol Clark. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Proust, Marcel. 2003d. In Search of Lost Time. Volume 6: Finding Time Again, ed. Prendergast, Christopher, trans. Ian Patterson. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Raymond, Christopher C. 2019. “Nietzsche’s Revaluation of Socrates.” In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, ed. Moore, Christopher. Leiden: Brill. 837–880.Google Scholar

Reich, Hauke. 2012. Rezensionen und Reaktionen zu Nietzsches Werken: 1872–1889. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, Karl. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der Philosophie. Bonn: Friedrich Cohen.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, Karl. 1982. “Heraklits Lehre vom Feuer” [1942] and “Heraclitea” [1942]. In K. R., Vermächtnis der Antike. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 41–71 and 72–97.Google Scholar

Reschke, Renate. 2017. “‘Die Welt ist ein Spiel des Zeus … ‘: Friedrich Nietzsches ästhetische Sicht auf Heraklit.” In Heraklit im Kontext, ed. Fantino, Enrica, Muss, Ulrike, Schubert, Charlotte, and Sier, Kurt. Heraklit im Kontext. Berlin: De Gruyter. 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rex, Walter E. 1998. Diderot’s Counterpoints: The Dynamics of Contrariety in His Major Works. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar

Riccardi, Mattia. 2021. Nietzsche’s Philosophical Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Jean Paul. 1963. Vorschule der aesthetik; nebst einigen Vorlesungen in Leipzig über die Parteien der Zeit. I. Oder Miserikoridas-Vorlesung über die Kunst für Stilistiker (1813). In Werke, Vol. 5, ed. Muller, Norbert. Munich: Carl Hansen.Google Scholar

Ridley, Aaron. 2013. “Nietzsche and the Arts of Life.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, ed. Gemes, Ken and Richardson, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rilke, Rainer Maria. 2011. Letters to a Young Poet, trans. Charlie Louth. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Robertson, Michael. 2012. “Nietzsche’s Poet-Philosopher: Towards a Poetics of Response-ability, Possibility, and the Future.” Mosaic vol. 45, no. 1: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robichaud, Denis J. J. 2018. Plato’s Persona: Marsilio Ficino, Renaissance Humanism, and Platonic Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rolls, Allistair, ed. 2006. Sartre’s Nausea: Text, Context, Intertext. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosen, Stanley. 2004. The Mask of Enlightenment: Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, Thomas G. 1988. “Das Kuckuckskapitel.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte vol. 62, no. 3:540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Donald A., and Konstan, David, eds. 2005. Heraclitus: Homeric Problems. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Sabot, Philippe. 2004. “Gide disciple de Nietzsche? L’Immoraliste en 1902.” In Le Moment 1900 en philosophie, ed. Worms, Frédéric. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin. 1857. Causeries du lundi. 3rd ed. 15 vols. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar

Sainte-Beuve, Charles Augustin. 2014. Menschen des XVIII: Jahrhunderts, ed. Overbeck, Ida and Urs Sommer, Andreas, trans. Ida Overbeck. Berlin: Die Andere Bibliothek.Google Scholar

Sand, George 1956. Winter in Majorca, trans. Robert Graves. Mallorca: Valldemosa Edition.Google Scholar

Santaniello, Weaver Santaniello. 1997. “Nietzsche and the Jews: Christendom and Nazism.” In Nietzsche and Jewish Culture, ed. Golomb, Jacob. London: Routledge. 21–54.Google Scholar

Santayana, George. 1940. The Realm of Spirit. London: Constable and Company.Google Scholar

Santayana, George. 1968. “Shelley: Or the Poetic Value of Revolutionary Principles.” In Selected Critical Writings of George Santayana, ed. Henfrey, Norman. London: Cambridge University Press. 57–81.Google Scholar

Santayana, George. 1989. “The Poetry of Barbarism.” In Santayana, George, Interpretations of Poetry and Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 103–131.Google Scholar

Santayana, George. 2009. “The Elements and Function of Poetry.” In The Essential Santayana: Selected Writings, ed. The Santayana Edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 265–282.Google Scholar

Santini, Carlotta. 2014. “The History of Literature As an Issue: Nietzsche’s Attempt to Represent Antiquity.” In Nietzsche As a Scholar of Antiquity, ed. Jensen, Anthony K. and Heit., Helmut London: Bloomsbury Academic. 159–179.Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1984. Existentialism and Humanism. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2004. The Transcendence of the Ego. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2013. Nausea, trans. Lloyd Alexander. New York: New Direction.Google Scholar

Schaberg, William H. 1995. The Nietzsche Canon: A Publication History and Bibliography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Schacht, Richard, ed. 1994. Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morals. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 1958–2020. Kritische Friedrich–Schlegel–Ausgabe, ed. Behler, Ernst with Anstett, Jean Jacques and Eichner, Hans. 36 vols. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. 1968. Gespräch über die Poesie, ed. Eichner, Hans. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1838. Sämtliche Werke, Siebenter Band: Hermeneutik und Kritik mit besonderer Beziehung auf das Neue Testament, ed. Lücke, Friedrich. Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1998a. Herakleitos der dunkle, von Ephesos, dargestellt aus den Trümmern seines Werkes und den Zeugnissen der Alten (1808). In Kritische Gesamtausgabe, I/ 6, ed. Schmid, Dirk. Berlin: De Gruyter. 107–241.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1998b. Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings, ed. and trans. Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schober, Angelika. 1993. “Diderot et Nietzsche.” Diderot Studies vol. 25: 89–107.Google Scholar

Schonfield, Ernst. 2008. Art and Its Uses in Thomas Mann’s Felix Krull. Bithell Series of Dissertations. London: Maney.Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur, 1912. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, ed. Berndl, Ludwig. Munich: Georg Müller.Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1966. The World As Will and Representation, Vol. 2, trans. Eric F. J. Payne. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2010. The World As Will and Representation, Vol. 1, trans. Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman, and Christopher Janaway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, Grant F., ed. 2002. The Letters of John Keats. Based on the Texts of Hyder Edward Rollins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schrift, Alan. 1990. Nietzsche and the Question of Interpretation: Between Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schrift, Alan. 1995. Nietzsche’s French Legacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scott, Jacqueline, and Franklin, A. Todd, eds. 2006. Critical Affinities: Nietzsche and African American Thought. Ithaca: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sedgwick, Peter R. 1997. “Nietzsche As Literature / Nietzsche As ‘German’ Literature.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies, no. 13: 53–71.Google Scholar

Shea, Louisa. 2010. The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sier, Kurt. 2012. “Warum ist Heraklit so schwierig?” In Die Geburt der Griechischen Weisheit, ed. Kath, Roxana and Rücker., Michaela Halle: Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Regionalstudien Vorderer Orient, Afrika, Asien der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. 41–56.Google Scholar

Silk, Michael. 2016. “Nietzsche’s Socrateases.” In Socrates in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, ed. Trapp, Michael. London: Taylor and Francis. 37–57.Google Scholar

da Silva, Denise Ferreira. 2007. Toward a Global Idea of Race. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg. 1986. Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, trans. Helmut Loiskandl, Deena Weinstein, and Michael Weinstein. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Sjögren, Christine Oertel. 1972. The Marble Statue As Idea: Collected Essays on Adalbert Stifter’s Der Nachsommer. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Sloterdijk, Peter. 2011. Bubbles: Spheres I. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar

Sloterdijk, Peter. 2014. Globes: Spheres II. Macrospherology. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar

Small, Helen. 2020. The Function of Cynicism at the Present Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snell, Bruno. 1926. “Die Sprache Heraclits.” Hermes vol. 61: 353–381 (= Gesammelte Schriften, Gottingen, 1966, 129–151).Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C. 2003. Living with Nietzsche: What the Great “Immoralist” Has to Teach Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sommer, Andreas Urs. 2019. Kommentar zu Nietzsches “Zur Genealogie der Moral”. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spinoza, Benedict de. 2018. Ethics Proved in Geometrical Order, ed. Kisner, Matthew J., trans. Michael Silverthorne and Matthew J. Kisner. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean. 2012. Diderot, un diable de ramage. Paris: Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staten, Henry. 1990. Nietzsche’s Voice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Stendhal, . 1962. Racine and Shakespeare, trans. Guy Daniels. New York: Crowell-Collier.Google Scholar

Stern, J. P. 1971. Idylls and Realities. Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature. London: Methuen and Company.Google Scholar

Stifter, Adalbert. 1994. Bunte Steine. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Stifter, Adalbert. 2005. Nachsommer. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Stifter, Adalbert. 2009. Indian Summer, trans. Wendell Frye. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Stifter, Adalbert. 2021. Motley Stones, trans. Isabel Fargo Cole. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Shannon. 2011. “Sad versus Joyful Passions: Spinoza, Nietzsche, and the Transformation of Whiteness.” Philosophy Today vol. 55 (Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy [SPEP] Supplement): 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swales, Martin, and Swales, Erika. 1984. Adalbert Stifter: A Critical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tadié, Jean-Yves. 1996. Marcel Proust: Biographie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Tanner, Michael. 2000. Nietzsche: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thoreau, Henry David. 1998. A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Trahan, Elizabeth Welt. 1957. “Friedrich Nietzsche’s Literary Criticism and Its European Background.” Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar

Tuncel, Yunus. 2014. “Why Do Poets Lie Too Much? Nietzsche, Poetry and the Different Voices of Zarathustra.” The Agonist vol. 8. bit.ly/43iPqc2.Google Scholar

Ullern, Isabelle, and Michaud, Genette. 2018. Sarah Kofman et Jacques Derrida: Croisements, Ecarts, Différences. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Usher, Mark D. 1998. Homeric Stitchings: The Homeric Centos of the Empress Eudocia. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Valéry, Paul. 1957. “Poésie et pensée abstraite.” In Œuvres, Vol. 1, ed. Hytier, Jean. Paris: Gallimard, La Pléiade. 1314–1339.Google Scholar

Valéry, Paul. 1986. “Cartesius redivivus.” In Cahiers Paul Valéry 4, ed. Jarrety, Michel. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Valéry, Paul. 2004. “Lettre à Pierre Louÿs du 15 février 1899.” In Gide, André, Louÿs, Pierre, and Valéry, Paul, Correspondance à trois voix, ed. Fawcett, Peter and Mercier, Pascal, Paris: Gallimard. 878.Google Scholar

Valéry, Paul. 2015 (1972). Collected Works of Paul Valéry, Volume 8: Leonardo, Poe, Mallarme, trans. Malcolm Cowley and James Lawler. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Valéry, Paul. 2017. Sur Nietzsche, ed. Jarrety, Michel. Paris: La Coopérative.Google Scholar

Valk, Thorsten, ed. 2009. Friedrich Nietzsche und die Literatur der klassischen Moderne. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vico, Giambattista. 1999. New Science, trans. David Marsh. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wampole, Christy. 2016. Rootedness: The Ramifications of a Metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weil, Simone. 2002. The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties towards Mankind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Westerdale, Joel. 2013. Nietzsche’s Aphoristic Challenge. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Alan. 1990. Within Nietzsche’s Labyrinth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” Science vol. 155, no. 3767: 1203–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiedemann, Eva Sophie. 2004. Adalbert Stifters Kosmos. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Wilcox, John T. 1974. Truth and Value in Nietzsche. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Wilcox, John T. 1997. “What Aphorism Does Nietzsche Explicate in ‘Genealogy of Morals’ Essay III?” Journal of the History of Philosophy vol. 35, no. 4 (October): 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilcox, John T. 1998. “That Exegesis of an Aphorism in Genealogy III: Reflections on the Scholarship.” Nietzsche-Studien vol. 28: 448–462.Google Scholar

Wilde, Oscar. 1905. De Profundis. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar

Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. 1997 “Magic-Media Mountain: Technology and the Umbildungsroman.” In Reading Matters: Narratives in the New Media Ecology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 29–52.Google Scholar

Wohlfart, Günther. 1991. Also sprach Herakleitos Heraklits Fragment B52 and Nietzsches Heraklit Rezeption. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Charles T., and Shank, John Bennnett. 2019. “Denis Diderot.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/diderot (Accessed July 12, 2022).Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 2008. “Poetry, Fiction, and the Future.” In Woolf, Virginia, Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 74–85.Google Scholar

Wysling, Hans. 1982. Narzissmus und illusionäre Existenzform: Zu den Bekenntnissen des Hochstaplers Felix Krull. Thomas Mann Studien, Vol. 5. Bern: Franke.Google Scholar

Young, Julian. 2014. The Death of God and the Meaning of Life. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar