Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:54:05.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Licensing and Certification

from Part I - Common Assessment Methods Deployed with Internet Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2017

By
John A. Weiner  and
David Foster
Edited by
John C. Scott ,
Dave Bartram  and
Douglas H. Reynolds
John C. Scott
Affiliation:
APT Metrics
Dave Bartram
Affiliation:
CEB-SHL
Douglas H. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Development Dimensions International
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Next Generation Technology-Enhanced Assessment
Global Perspectives on Occupational and Workplace Testing
 , pp. 36 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. 101–336. 26 July 1990. 104 Stat. 328.Google Scholar
Baker, & McKenzie, (2006). Worldwide guide to termination, employment discrimination, and workplace harassment laws. Ithaca, NY: Cornell ILR School Digital Commons.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. E., & Zhang, M. (2016). Validity and automated scoring. In Drasgow, F. (Ed.), Technology and testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co.Google Scholar
Cizek, G. J. (Ed.). (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Conradt, C. (2012). The game of work. Layton, UT: Gibbs Smith.Google Scholar
Davey, T., & Nering, M. (2002). Controlling item exposure and maintaining item security. In Mills, C. N., Potenza, M. T., Fremer, J. J., & Ward, W. C. (Eds.), Computer-based testing: Building the foundations for future assessments (pp. 165–191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Feinberg, R. A., Raymond, M. R., & Haist, S. A. (2015). Repeat testing effects on credentialing exams: Are repeaters misinformed or uninformed? Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 34(1), 34–39.Google Scholar
Foster, D., & Miller, H. L., Jr. (2009). A new format for multiple-choice testing: Discrete-Option Multiple-Choice. Results from early studies. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(4), 355–369.Google Scholar
Foster, D. F., & Zervos, C. (2006). The big Internet heist. Poster presented at the Association of Test Publishers annual conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. M., & Weiner, J. A. (1998). Generating random parallel test forms using CTT in a computer-based environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 4.Google Scholar
Gierl, M., & Lai, H. (2013). Educational measurement: Issues and practice: Instructional topics in educational measurement (ITEMS). Module: Using automated processes to generate test items.Google Scholar
Gulino v. The Board of Education of the City of New York and the New York State Education.Google Scholar
The International Standards Organization (ISO) (2012). International Standard ISO/IEC Standard 17024:2012 ISO.Google Scholar
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Test equating. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Krogue, K. (2012, September 18). 5 gamification rules from the grandfather of gamification. Forbes.Google Scholar
Lord, F., & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mehrens, W. A. (1995). Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices. Paper 6.Google Scholar
Moore, G. (circa 1970). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law (accessed May 21, 2016).Google Scholar
National Commission for Certifying Agencies (2016). Standards for the accreditation of certification programs. Washington DC: Institute for Credentialling Excellence.Google Scholar
Peng, C. J., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1980). A note on Huynh’s normal approximation procedure for estimating criterion-referenced reliability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17(4), 359–368.Google Scholar
Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Batter. In Drasgow, F. & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (Eds.), Innovations in cauterized assessments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sergeant, (2012). Verification and validation of simulation models. Journal of Simulation, 7, 12–14.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. (2015). How a law to protect disabled Americans became imitated around the world. Retrieved from www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/07/24/425607389/how-a-law-to-protect-disabled-americans-became-imitated-around-the-world.Google Scholar
US Copyright Office, Library of Congress (2000). Copyright basics. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
US Copyright Office, Library of Congress (2015). Circular 38a.0915. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Department of Labor, Department of Justice, & Civil Service Commission (1978). Section 60–3, Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. 43 FR 38295.Google Scholar
Weller, J., Henderson, R., Webster, C., Shulruf, B., Torrie, J., Davies, E., Frampton, C., & Merry, A. (2014). Building the evidence on simulation validity: Comparison of anesthesiologists’ communication patterns in real and simulated cases. Anesthesiology, 120, 1.Google Scholar
Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2015). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×