American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010 and January 1, 2017). Retrieved July 8, 2017 from www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspxGoogle Scholar

Australian Psychological Society. (2007). APS code of ethics. Melbourne, Australia: Author. Retrieved from www.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/APS-Code-of-Ethics.pdf.Google Scholar

Baez, H. B. (2013, January 26). Personality tests in employment selection: Use with caution. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved from www.cornellhrreview.org/personality-tests-in-employment-selection-use-with-caution/.Google Scholar

Bartram, D., & Coyne, I. (1998). Variations in national patterns of testing and test use: The ITC/EFPPA International Survey. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14(3), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaty, J. C., Nye, C. D., Borneman, M. J., Kantrowitz, T. M., Drasgow, F., & Grauer, E. (2011). Proctored versus unproctored Internet tests: Are unproctored noncognitive tests as predictive of job performance? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Begley, S. A., Trankiem, J. Y., & Hansel, S. T. (2014, October 14). Employers using personality tests to vet applicants need cautious “personalities” of their own. The employment beat. Fortune, 189, unpaginated. Retrieved from www.forbes.com/sites/theemploymentbeat/2014/10/30/employers-using-personality-tests-to-vet-applicants-need-cautious-personalities-of-their-own/#74edd68d1ab2.Google Scholar

Buchanan, T. (2007). Personality testing on the Internet. In Joinson, A. N., McKenna, K. Y. A., Postmes, T., Reips, U.-D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 447–459). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Canadian Psychological Association. (2017). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists. (4th ed.). Ottawa, Canada: Author. Retrieved from www.cpa.ca/docs/File/Ethics/CPA_Code_2017_4thEd.pdf. (Accessed September 19, 2017).Google Scholar

Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment. (1996). Statement on the disclosure of test data. American Psychologist, 51, 644–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coyne, I., & Bartram, D. (2006a). Design and development of the ITC Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 133–142. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coyne, I., & Bartram, D. (2006b). Introduction to the special issue on the ITC guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6, 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelstein, L. (1967). The Hippocratic Oath: Text, translation and interpretation. In Temkin, O. & Temkin, C. L. (Eds.), Ludwig Edelstein: Ancient medicine: Selected papers of Ludwig Edelstein (pp. 3–64). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, B., & Levy, P. E. (2015). Using feedback in organizational consulting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The International Taskforce on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2014). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations (6th ed.). Retrieved from www.assessmentcenters.org/Assessmentcenters/media/2014/2014-Final-Presentations/International-AC-Guidelines-6th-Edition-2014.pdf (accessed January 30, 2016).Google Scholar

International Test Commission. (2014). The ITC guidelines on the security of tests, examinations, and other assessments. Version 1.0 Final Version Document reference: ITC-G-TS- 20140706. Published online [www.intestcom.org]. Retrieved from www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_security.pdf (accessed February 7, 2016).Google Scholar

Jeanneret, P. R., & Zedeck, S. (2017). Legal and ethical issues in employee selection. In J. L. Farr & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 599–630). New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar

Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists. (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology (2013). American Psychologist, 68, 791–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantrowitz, T., & Dainis, A. (2014). How secure are unproctored pre-employment tests? Analysis of inconsistent test scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karim, M. N., Kaminsky, S. E., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: An exploratory experimental study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefkowitz, J., & Lowman, R. L. (2017). Ethics of employee selection. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 575–598). New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

London, M., & McFarland, L.A. (2017). Assessment feedback. In J. L. Farr & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 406–426). New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar

Lowman, R. L. (Ed.). (2006). The ethical practice of psychology in organizations (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowman, R. L. (Ed.). (2013). Internationalizing multiculturalism: Expanding professional competencies in a globalized world. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowman, R. L. (Ed.). (2016). An introduction to consulting psychology: Working with individuals, groups, and organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Lowman, R. L. (Ed.). (in press). Ethical issues and standards in research and applications of industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In Ones, D.S., Anderson, N., & Kepir Singagil, H, SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, 2e, V1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Lowman, R.L., & Cooper, S.E. (2018). The ethical practice of consulting psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowack, K., & Mashihi, S. (2012). Evidence-based answers to 15 questions about leveraging 360-degree feedback. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64, 157–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearlman, K. (2009). Unproctored internet testing: Practical, legal, and ethical concerns. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poeppelman, T., & Blacksmith, N. (2015). The realities of Internet testing: Security considerations and best practices. TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 53(2), 54–59.Google Scholar

Professional Board for Psychology. (2006). Rules of conduct pertaining specifically to the profession of psychology. Health Professions Act, 1974. South Africa.Google Scholar

Putka, D. J., (2017). Reliability and validity. In Farr, J. L., & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 3–33). New York: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reynolds, D. H., & Dickter, D. N. (2017). Technology and employee selection. An overview. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 855–873). New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shen, W., Sackett, P.R., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., Steiner, D.D., …, Cook, M. (2017). Updated perspectives on the international legal environment for selection. In J.L. Farr & N.T. Tippins (Eds.). Handbook of employee selection (pp. 659–677). New York: Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group).Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. R., & Hulsherger, U. R. (2010). Employee selection in Europe: Psychotechnics and the forgotten history of modern scientific employee selection. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 921–941). New York: Routledge (Taylor and Francis Group).Google Scholar

Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Retrieved from www.siop.org/_Principles/principles.pdf.Google Scholar

“Summary by language size.” (2016). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Retrieved from https://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/size.Google Scholar

Tippins, N., Beaty, J. Drasgow, F., Gibson, W. M., Pearlman, K., Segall, D. O., & Shepherd, W. (2006). Unproctored Internet testing in employment settings. Personnel Psychology, 59, 189–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turkish Psychological Association. (2004). Turkish Psychological Association Ethics Code. Retrieved from https://www.psikolog.org.tr/turkey-code-eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Weber, K., & Dwoskin, E. (2014). Are workplace personality tests fair? Growing use of tests sparks scrutiny amid questions of effectiveness and workplace Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/are-workplace-personality-tests-fair-1412044257.Google Scholar

Wunder, R. S., Thomas, L. L., & Luo, Z. (2010) Administering assessments and decision making. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 377–398). New York: Psychology Press (Taylor and Francis).Google Scholar