American Psychological Association. (2006). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291–304.Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (2011). Contributions of the EFPA Standing Committee on Tests and Testing to Standards and Good Practice. European Psychologist, 16(2), 149–159.Google Scholar

Bartram, D., & Burke, E. (2013). Industrial/organizational testing case studies. In Wollack, J. A. & Fremer, J. J. (Eds.), Handbook of test security (pp. 313–332). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Black, M. M., & Matula, K. (2000). Essentials of Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Blickle, G. (2003). Ethics. In Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment, vol. 1 (pp. 373–378). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Burke, E. (2009). Preserving the integrity of online testing. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(1), 35–38.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W.-Z., Zhang, J.-X., & Zhang, J.-P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603.Google Scholar

Church, A. T. (2009). Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology. European Journal of Personality, 23, 153–182.Google Scholar

Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, R., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers and Education, 59(2), 661–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Bartram, D., Boben, D., Egeland, J., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Frans, O., Gintiliené, G., Hagemeister, C., Halama, P., Iliescu, D., Jaworowska, A., Jimenez, P., Manthouli, M., Matesic, K., Schittekatte, M., Sümer, C., & Urbánek, T. (2011). Testing practices in the 21th century. Developments and European Psychologist’s Opinions. European Psychologists, 17(4), 300–319.Google Scholar

Foster, D. (2013). Security issues in technology-based testing. In Wollack, J. A. & Fremer, J. J. (Eds.), Handbook of test security (pp. 39–84). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gierl, M. J., & Haladyna, T. M. (2013). Automatic item generation: Theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.Google Scholar

Gregory, R. J. (2011). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2015). ABAS-3: Intervention planner. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D. (2014). A quantitative segmentation of stakeholders’ opinions about legal test usage. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the International Test Commission, San Sebastian, Spain, July.Google Scholar

International Test Commission. (2001). International guidelines for test use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93–114.Google Scholar

International Test Commission. (2012). International guidelines on quality control in scoring, test analysis, and reporting of test scores. Retrieved from www.intestcom.org (accessed March 6, 2017).Google Scholar

International Test Commission. (2014). International Guidelines on the Security of Tests, Examinations, and Other Assessments. Retrieved from www.intestcom.org (accessed March 6, 2017).Google Scholar

International Test Commission. (2015). International Guidelines for Practitioner Use of Test Revisions, Obsolete Tests, and Test Disposal. Retrieved from www.intestcom.org (accessed March 6, 2017).Google Scholar

ISO. (2011). International standard for assessment service delivery procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings ISO 10667-2. Retrieved from www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=iso+10667-2&sort=rel&type=simple&published=on (accessed January 10, 2015).Google Scholar

Joinson, A. N., & Paine, C. B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet. In Joinson, A., McKenna, K., Postmes, T., & Reips, U.-D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 237–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., Lichtenberger, E. O., Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Kaufman, N. L. (2005). Essentials of KABC-II assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Kingston, N. M., Tiemann, G. C., Miller, H. L., & Foster, D. (2012). An analysis of the discrete-option multiple-choice item type. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(1), 3–19.Google Scholar

Leach, M., & Oakland, T. (2007). Ethics standards impacting test development and use: A review of 31 ethics codes impacting practices in 35 countries. International Journal of Testing, 7, 71–88.Google Scholar

Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar

Lord, W. (2007). NEO PI-R: A guide to interpretation and feedback in a work context. London: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nel, J. A., Valchev, V. H., Rothmans, S., van de Vijver, F., Meiring, D., & de Bruin, G. P. (2012). Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 915–948.Google Scholar

Oakland, T. (2012). Testing resources help promote test development and use in emerging countries. Presented at the 8th Conference of the International Test Commission, Amsterdam, July.Google Scholar

Oakland, T., & Harrison, P. L. (2008). ABAS-II: Clinical use and interpretation. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Phelps, R. P. (2009). Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Ramsay, M. C., Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2002). Essentials of behavioral assessment. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. C. (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Traub, R. (1997). Classical test theory in historical perspective. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(4), 8–14.Google Scholar

Vannest, K. J., Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2008). BASC-2 intervention guide. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar

Vannest, K. J., Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2009). BASC-2 classroom intervention guide workbook 1: Externalizing and school problems. Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar