Allcott, Hunt and Gentzkow, Matthew. 2017. “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(2): 211–236.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance. 1998. “The Uncivic Culture: Communication, Identity and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics.” Political Science & Politics 31: 741–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance. 2008. “Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age” pp. 1–24 in Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2012. “The Logic of Connective Action.” Information, Communication & Society 15: 739–768.Google Scholar

Berelson, Bernard. “What ‘Missing the Newspaper’ Means” in Lazarsfeld, Paul and Stanton, Frank (eds.) Communications Research, 1948–1949. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Blumler, Jay G. and McQuail, Denis. 1968. Television in politics: Its uses and influence. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Lynn and Marchi, Regina. 2017. Young People and the Future of News. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Esaiasson, Peter and Narud, Hanne Marthe (eds.). 2013. Between-Election Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Gans, Herbert J. 1979.Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2011. “Ideological Segregation Online and Offline.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1799–1836.Google Scholar

Gottfried, Jeffrey and Shearer, Elisa. 2016. “News Use across Social Media Platforms 2016.” Pew Research Center, May 26. https://pewrsr.ch/27TOfhzGoogle Scholar

Guess, Andrew. 2016. “Media Choice and Moderation: Evidence from Online Tracking Data.” Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved May 26, 2017. www.dropbox.com/s/uk005hhio3dysm8/GuessJMP.pdf?dl=0Google Scholar

Hamilton, James F. 2016. “Hybrid News Practices” pp. 164–178 in Witschge, Tamara,Anderson, Chris W., Domingo, David, and, Hermida, Alfred (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Hindman, Matthew. 2008. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Howard, Philip N. 2005. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchison, Marc L., Schiano, Salvatore, and Whitten-Woodring, Jenifer. 2016. “When the Fourth Estate Becomes a Fifth Column: The Effect of Media Freedom and Social Intolerance on Civil Conflict.” International Journal of Press/Politics 21(2): 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe: International Change in Post-Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 65: 991–1017.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Josephi, Beate. 2016. “Digital Journalism and Democracy” pp. 9–24 in Witschge, Tamara, Anderson, Chris W., Domingo, David, and Hermida, Alfred (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Karpf, David. 2016. Analytical Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Keane, John. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Kreiss, Daniel. 2012. Taking Our Country Back. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kruikemeier, Sanne, van Noort, Guda, Vliegenthart, Rens, and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2014. “Unraveling the Effects of Active and Passive Forms of Political Internet Use: Does It Affect Citizens’ Political Involvement?” New Media & Society 16(6): 903–920.Google Scholar

Kümpel, Anna Sophie, Karnowski, Veronika, and Keyling, Till. 2015. “News Sharing in Social Media: A Review of Current Research on News Sharing Users, Contents, and Networks.” Social Media + Society 1(2): 1–14.Google Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew. 2016. “(Mis)Perceptions of Political Polarization in the American Public.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1): 378–391.Google Scholar

Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. “A Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century” pp. 1–28 in Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.) The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Amy, Gottfried, Jeffrey, and Barthel, Michael. 2017. “Trump, Clinton Voters Divided in Their Main Source for Election News.” Pew Research Center, January 18. Retrieved June 19, 2019. https://pewrsr.ch/2joeTvaGoogle Scholar

Negroponte, Nicholas. 1995. Being Digital. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Neumann, W. Russell, Bimber, Bruce, and Hindman, Matthew. 2011. “The Internet and Four Dimensions of Citizenship” pp. 22–42 in Shapiro, Robert Y. and Jacobs, Lawrence R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nicey, Jeremie. 2016. “Semi-Professional Amateurs” pp. 222–235 in Witschge, Tamara,Anderson, Chris W., Domingo, David, and Hermida, Alfred (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2013. “Mundane Internet Tools, the Risk of Exclusion, and Reflexive Movements – Occupy Wall Street and Political Uses of Digital Networked Technologies.” The Sociological Quarterly 54: 159–228.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa. 2014. “Watchdog Journalism” pp. 525–541 in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E., and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Oser, Jennifer, Hooghe, Marc, and Marien, Sofie. 2013. “Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification.” Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papacharissi, Zizi A. 2010. A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Pingree, Raymond. 2015. “Effects of Online Political Messages on Their Senders” pp. 139–151 in de Zuniga, Homero Gil (ed.) New Technologies and Civic Engagement: New Agendas in Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Postman, Neil. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Project for Excellence in Journalism. 2010. “How News Happens: A Study of the News Ecosystem of One American City.” Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved June 19, 2019. www.journalism.org/2010/01/11/how-news-happens/Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Robinson, Sue. 2007. “‘Someone’s Gotta Be in Control Here’: The Institutionalization of Online News and the Creation of a Shared Journalistic Authority.” Journalism Practice (1–3): 305–321.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schudson, Michael. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Silverman, Craig. 2016. “This Analysis Shows how Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook.” BuzzFeed News, November 16. Retrieved June 19, 2019. https://bit.ly/31GpLujGoogle Scholar

Silverman, Craig and Singer-Vine, Jeremy. 2016. “Most Americans Who See Fake News Believe It, New Survey Says.” BuzzFeed News, December 6. Retrieved June 19, 2019. https://bit.ly/2ZBSYVAGoogle Scholar

Spenkuch, Jörg L. and Toniatti, David. 2016. “Political Advertising and Election Outcomes.” CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 5780.Google Scholar

Stolle, Dietlind and Micheletti, Michele. 2013. Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 2017. #republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Waisbord, Silvio and Amado, Adriana. 2017. “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1330–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zukin, Cliff, Keeter, Scott, Andolina, Molly, Jenkins, Krista, and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2006. A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alonso, William and Starr, Paul. 1987. “Introduction” pp. 1–6 in Alonso, William and Starr, Paul (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 1991 [1983]. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Anderson, Margo J. 1988. The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Margo and Fienberg, Stephen E.. 2000. “Race and Ethnicity and the Controversy Over the US Census.” Current Sociology 48(3): 87–110.Google Scholar

Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, David. 2003. “Geographical Knowledge and Scientific Survey in the Construction of Italian Libya.” Modern Italy 8(1): 9–29.Google Scholar

Balogh, Brian. 2009. A Government Out of Sight: The Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-Century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Balogh, Brian. 2015. The Associational State: American Governance in the Twentieth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Boltanski, Luc. 1987. The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boltanski, Luc and Thévenot., Laurent 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Translated by Catherine Porter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1999. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field,” translated by Loïc J. D. Wacquant and Samar Farage, pp. 53–75 in Steinmetz, George (ed.) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2012. Sur l’état: Cours au collège de France, 1989–1992. Paris: Raisons d’agir/Seuil.Google Scholar

Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers and Cooper, Frederick. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity.’” Theory and Society 29(1): 1–47.Google Scholar

Bruno, Isabelle and Didier, Emmanuel. 2013. Benchmarking: L’État sous pression statistique. Paris: Zones.Google Scholar

Bruno, Isabelle, Didier, Emmanuel, and Vitale, Tommaso. 2014. “Statactivism: Forms of Action between Disclosure and Affirmation.” PArtecipazione e COnflitto 7(2): 198–220.Google Scholar

Buck, Peter. 1982. “People Who Counted: Political Arithmetic in the Eighteenth Century.” ISIS 73(266): 28–45.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay” pp. 196–233 in Law, John (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel. 1998. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics” pp. 1–57 in Callon, Michel (ed.) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carroll, Patrick. 2006. Science, Culture, and Modern State Formation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Choldin, Harvey M. 1994. Looking for the Last Percent: The Controversy Over Census Undercounts. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Clemens, Elisabeth S. 2006. “Lineages of the Rube Goldberg State: Building and Blurring Public Programs, 1900–1940” pp. 187–215 in Shapiro, Ian, Skowronek, Stephen, and Galvin, Daniel (eds.) Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Patricia Cline. 1982. A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cohn, Bernard S. 1987. An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John L.. 2006. “Figuring Crime: Quantifacts and the Production of the Un/Real.” Public Culture 18(1): 209–246.Google Scholar

Crook, Tom and O’Hara, Glen. 2011. “The ‘Torrent of Numbers’: Statistics and the Public Sphere in Britain, c. 1800–2000” pp. 1–31 in Crook, Tom and O’Hara, Glen (eds.) Statistics and the Public Sphere: Numbers and the People in Modern Britain, c. 1800–2000. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Curtis, Bruce. 2001. The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840–1875. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Curtis, Bruce. 2002. “Foucault on Governmentality and Population: The Impossible Discovery.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 27(4): 505–533.Google Scholar

DaCosta, Kimberly McClain. 2007. Making Multiracials: State, Family, and Market in the Redrawing of the Color Line. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Dandeker, Christopher. 1990. Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Duany, Jorge. 2002. The Puerto Rican Nation on the Move: Identities on the Island and in the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, Mark. 2000. “‘Mark One or More’: Counting and Projecting by Race on US Census 2000 and Beyond.” Social & Cultural Geography 1(2): 183–195.Google Scholar

Emigh, Rebecca Jean, Riley, Dylan, and Ahmed, Patricia. 2015. “The Racialization of Legal Categories in the First U.S. Census.” Social Science History 39(4): 485–519.Google Scholar

Emigh, Rebecca Jean, Riley, Dylan, and Ahmed, Patricia. 2016a. How Societies and States Count, Volume 1: Antecedents of Censuses from Medieval to Nation States. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Emigh, Rebecca Jean, Riley, Dylan, and Ahmed, Patricia. 2016b. How Societies and States Count, Volume II: Changes in Censuses from Imperialist to Welfare States. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Epstein, Steven. 2007. Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40.Google Scholar

Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Stevens, Mitchell L.. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 49(3): 401–436.Google Scholar

Espiritu, Yen Le. 1992. Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Translated by Hurley, Robert. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1979a. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1979b. “Governmentality.” Ideology & Consciousness 6(Autumn): 5–21.Google Scholar

Frankel, Oz. 2006. States of Inquiry: Social Investigations and Print Culture in Nineteenth-Century Britain and the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Furner, Mary O. and Supple, Barry. 1990. “Ideas, Institutions, and State in the United States and Britain: An Introduction” pp. 3–39 in Furner, Mary O. and Supple, Barry (eds.) The State and Economic Knowledge: The American and British Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garfield, Simon. 2013. On the Map: A Mind-Expanding Exploration of the Way the World Looks. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Volume 1: Power, Property and the State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1985. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Volume 2: The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Beatty, John, and Krüger., Lorenz 1989. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, David Theo. 1997. Racial Subjects: Writing on Race in America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1981. “How Should We Do the History of Statistics?” Ideology & Consciousness 8(Spring): 15–26.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1982. “Biopower and the Avalanche of Printed Numbers.” Humanities in Society 5(3–4): 279–295.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1986. “Making Up People” pp. 222–236 in Heller, Thomas C., Sosna, Morton, Wellbery, David E., Davidson, Arnold I., Swidler, Ann, and Watt, Ian (eds.) Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1995. “The Looping Effects of Human Kinds” pp. 351–394 in Sperber, Dan, Premack, David, and Premack, Ann James (eds.) Casual Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hannah, Matthew G. 2000. Governmentality and the Mastery of Territory in Nineteenth-Century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harley, J. B. 1989. “Deconstructing the Map.” Cartographica 26(2): 1–20.Google Scholar

Hess, Volker. 2005. “Standardizing Body Temperature: Quantification in Hospitals and Daily Life, 1850–1900” pp. 109–126 in Jorland, Gérard, Opinel, Annick, and Weisz, George (eds.) Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Higgs, Edward. 2004. The Information State in England: The Central Collection of Information on Citizens since 1500. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Higgs, Edward. 2011. “The State and Statistics in Victorian and Edwardian Britain: Promotion of the Public Sphere of Boundary Maintenance?” pp. 67–83 in Crook, Tom and O’Hara, Glen (eds.) Statistics and the Public Sphere: Numbers and the People in Modern Britain, c. 1800–2000. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Charles. 1987. “The Meaning and Measurement of Ethnicity in Malaysia: An Analysis of Census Classifications.” Journal of Asian Studies 46(3): 555–582.Google Scholar

Hochschild, Jennifer L. and Powell, Brenna Marea. 2008. “Racial Reorganization and the United States Census 1850–1930: Mulattoes, Half-Breeds, Mixed Parentage, Hindoos, and the Mexican Race.” Studies in American Political Development 22(1): 59–96.Google Scholar

Humes, Karen and Hogan, Howard. 2009. “Measurement of Race and Ethnicity in a Changing, Multicultural America.” Race and Social Problems 1(3): 111–131.Google Scholar

Igo, Sarah E. 2007. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jepperson, Ronald L. 2002. “Political Modernities: Disentangling Two Underlying Dimensions of Institutional Differentiation.” Sociological Theory 20(1): 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kertzer, David I. and Arel, Dominique. 2002. “Censuses, Identity Formation, and the Struggle for Political Power” pp. 1–42 in Kertzer, David I. and Arel, Dominique (eds.) Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kertzer, David I. and Arel, Dominique. 2006. “Population Composition as an Object of Political Struggle” pp. 664–677 in Goodin, Robert E. and Tilly, Charles (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

King, Rebecca Chiyoko. 2000. “Racialization, Recognition, and Rights: Lumping and Splitting Multiracial Asian Americans in the 2000 Census.” Journal of Asian American Studies 3(2): 191–217.Google Scholar

Kitsuse, John I. and Cicourel, Aaron V.. 1963. “A Note on the Uses of Official Statistics.” Social Problems 11(2): 131–139.Google Scholar

Lam, Tong. 2011. A Passion for Facts: Social Surveys and the Construction of the Chinese Nation-State, 1900–1949. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lampland, Martha. 2010. “False Numbers as Formalizing Practices.” Social Studies of Science 40(3): 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1986. “The Powers of Association” pp. 264–280 in Law, John (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levitan, Kathrin. 2011. A Cultural History of the British Census: Envisioning the Multitude in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Loveman, Mara. 2005. “The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power.” American Journal of Sociology 110(6): 1651–1683.Google Scholar

Loveman, Mara. 2007a. “Blinded Like a State: The Revolt against Civil Registration in Nineteenth-Century Brazil.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 49(1): 5–39.Google Scholar

Loveman, Mara. 2007b. “The U.S. Census and the Contested Rules of Racial Classification in Early Twentieth-Century Puerto Rico.” Caribbean Studies 35(2): 13–47.Google Scholar

Loveman, Mara. 2014. National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Loveman, Mara and Muniz, Jeronimo O.. 2007. “How Puerto Rico Became White: Boundary Dynamics and Intercensus Racial Reclassification.” American Sociological Review 72(6): 915–939.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Donald A. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. “Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28(1): 29–55.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1968. Negations: Essays in Critical Theory. Translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Martin, Aryn and Lynch, Michael. 2009. “Counting Things and People: The Practices and Politics of Counting.” Social Problems 56(2): 243–266.Google Scholar

Mayrl, Damon and Quinn, Sarah. 2016. “Defining the State from within: Boundaries, Schemas, and Associational Policymaking.” Sociological Theory 34(1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mezey, Naomi. 2003. “Erasure and Recognition: The Census, Race and the National Imagination.” Northwestern University Law Review 97(4): 1701–1768.Google Scholar

Miller, Peter and Rose, Nikolas. 1990. “Governing Economic Life.” Economy and Society 19(1): 1–31.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Timothy. 1999. “Society, Economy, and the State Effect” pp. 76–97 in Steinmetz, George (ed.) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Mora, G. Cristina. 2014. “Cross-Field Effects and Ethnic Classification: The Institutionalization of Hispanic Panethnicity, 1965 to 1990.” American Sociological Review 79(2): 183–210.Google Scholar

Mukerji, Chandra. 2009. Impossible Engineering: Technology and Territoriality on the Canal du Midi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Murdoch, Jonathan and Ward, Neil. 1997. “Governmentality and Territoriality: The Statistical Manufacture of Britain’s ‘National Farm.’” Political Geography 16(4): 307–324.Google Scholar

Nobles, Melissa. 2000. Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Nobles, Melissa. 2002. “Racial Categorization and Censuses” pp. 43–70 in Kertzer, David I. and Arel, Dominique (eds.) Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Census. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ostler, Jeffrey. 2002. “Review of Matthew G. Hannah, Governmentality and the Mastery of Territory in Nineteenth-Century America.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 33(2): 312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panofsky, Aaron and Bliss, Catherine. 2017. “Ambiguity and Scientific Authority: Population Classification in Genomic Science.” American Sociological Review 82(1): 59–87.Google Scholar

Patriarca, Silvana. 1996. Numbers and Nationhood: Writing Statistics in Nineteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Perlmann, Joel and Waters, Mary C.. 2002. “Introduction” pp. 1–30 in Perlmann, Joel and Waters, Mary C. (eds.) The New Race Question: How the Census Counts Multiracial Individuals. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Petersen, William. 1987. “Politics and the Measurement of Ethnicity” pp. 187–233 in Alonso, William and Starr, Paul (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Poovey, Mary. 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science in Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Prévost, Jean-Guy. 2009. A Total Science: Statistics in Liberal and Fascist Italy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Prewitt, Kenneth. 1987. “Public Statistics and Democratic Politics” pp. 261–274 in Alonso, William and Starr, Paul (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Prewitt, Kenneth. 2013. What Is Your Race?: The Census and Our Flawed Efforts to Classify Americans. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Robbin, Alice. 2000. “Administrative Policy as Symbol System: Political Conflict and the Social Construction of Identity.” Administration & Society 32(4): 398–431.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, Clara E. 2000. Changing Race: Latinos, the Census, and the History of Ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Nikolas. 1991. “Governing by Numbers: Figuring out Democracy.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 16(7): 673–692.Google Scholar

Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter. 1992. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173–205.Google Scholar

Rose-Redwood, Reuben. 2012. “‘A Regular State of Beautiful Confusion’: Governing by Numbers and the Contradictions of Calculable Space in New York City.” Urban History 39(4): 624–638.Google Scholar

Rule, James B. 1973. Private Lives and Public Surveillance. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Saiani, Paolo Parra. 2012. “Democracy and Public Knowledge: An Issue for Social Indicators” pp. 225–242 in Maggino, Filomena and Nuvolati, Giampaolo (eds.) Quality of Life in Italy: Research and Reflections. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Simon. 1988. “Astronomers Mark Time: Discipline and the Personal Equation.” Science in Context 2(1): 115–145.Google Scholar

Schiaffino, Andrea. 1974. “L’organizzazione e il funzionamento dello stato civile nel regno italico (1806–1814). Problemi di utilizzazione a fini di ricerca demografica.” Cahiers internationaux d’histoire économique et sociale 3: 341–420.Google Scholar

Schware, Robert. 1981. Quantification in the History of Political Thought: Toward a Qualitative Approach. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Schweber, Libby. 2006. Disciplining Statistics: Demography and Vital Statistics in France and England, 1830–1885. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, Martin and Miles, Ian. 1979. “The Social Roots of Statistical Knowledge” pp. 27–38 in Irvine, John, Miles, Ian, and Evans, Jeff (eds.) Demystifying Social Statistics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Sherman, Sandra. 2001. Imagining Poverty: Quantification and the Decline of Paternalism. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Skerry, Peter. 2000. Counting on the Census? Race, Group Identity, and the Evasion of Politics. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Snipp, C. Matthew. 2003. “Racial Measurement in the American Census: Past Practices and Implications for the Future.” Annual Review of Sociology 29: 563–588.Google Scholar

Spencer, Rainier. 1999. Spurious Issues: Race and Multiracial Identity Politics in the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Stapleford, Thomas A. 2009. The Cost of Living in America: A Political History of Economic Statistics, 1880–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Starr, Paul. 1987. “The Sociology of Official Statistics” pp. 7–57 in Alonso, William and Starr, Paul (eds.) The Politics of Numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Sudnow, David. 1967. Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Thompson, Debra. 2010. “The Politics of the Census: Lessons from Abroad.” Canadian Public Policy 36(3): 377–382.Google Scholar

Timmermans, Stefan and Epstein, Steven. 2010. “A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Towards a Sociology of Standards and Standardization.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 69–89.Google Scholar

Urla, Jacqueline. 1993. “Cultural Politics in an Age of Statistics: Numbers, Nations, and the Making of Basque Identity.” American Ethnologist 20(4): 818–843.Google Scholar

Vertesi, Janet. 2015. Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Volume 1. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Kim M. 2006. Mark One or More: Civil Rights in Multiracial America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Woolf, Stuart J. 1984. “Towards the History of the Origins of Statistics: France 1789–1815” pp. 79–194 in Perrot, Jean-Claude and Woolf, Stuart J. (eds.) State and Statistics in France 1789–1815. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Woolf, Stuart J.. 1989. “Statistics and the Modern State.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31(3): 588–604.Google Scholar

Zaret, David. 2000. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Zuberi, Tukufu. 2001. Thicker than Blood: How Racial Statistics Lie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. Michael. 2016. Computational Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amenta, Edwin, Caren, Neal, Chiarello, Elizabeth, and Yang, Su. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 287–307.Google Scholar

Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete.” Wired, June 23.Google Scholar

Anduiza, Eva, Cantijoch, Marta, and Gallego, Aina. 2009. “Political Participation and the Internet.” Information, Communication & Society 12(6): 860–878.Google Scholar

Bail, Christopher. 2014. “The Cultural Environment: Measuring Culture with Big Data.” Theoretical Sociology 43(3–4): 465–482.Google Scholar

Barbera, Pablo. 2015. “Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data.” Political Analysis 23: 76–91.Google Scholar

Barbera, Pablo, Wang, Ning, Richard Bonneau, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nalger, Tucker, Joshua and Gonzalez-Bailon., Sandra 2015. “The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests.” PLOS ONE 10(11): 1–15.Google Scholar

Beieler, John, Brandt, Patrick T., Andrew Halterman, Phillip A. Schrodt, and Simpson, Erin M.. 2016. “Generating Event Data in Near Real Time: Opportunities and Challenges” pp. 98–121 in Michael Alvarez, R. (ed.) Computational Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Benkler, Yochai, Roberts, Hal, Faris, Robert, Solow-Niederman, Alicia, and Etling, Bruce. 2015. “Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate.” Political Communications 32(4): 594–624.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2015. “Three Patterns of Power in Technology-Enabled Contention.” Mobilization 19(4): 421–439.Google Scholar

Berger, J. M. 2013. “#Unfollow: The Case for Kicking Terrorists Off Twitter.” Foreign Policy February 20. Retrieved July 5, 2018. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/02/20/unfollow/Google Scholar

Berger, J. M.. 2014. “How ISIS Games Twitter.” Atlantic, June 16. Retrieved July 5, 2018. https://bit.ly/1n55aDdGoogle Scholar

Berger, J. M. and Morgan, Jonathon. 2015. The ISIS Twitter Census: Defining and Describing the Population of ISIS Supporters on Twitter. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar

Best, Rebecca H., Carpino, Christine, and Mark, J. C. Crescenzi. 2013. “An Analysis of the TABARI Coding System.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 30(4): 335–348.Google Scholar

Bimber, Bruce. 2014. “Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11(2): 130–150.Google Scholar

Bond, Doug, Bond, Joseph, Churl Oh, J. Jenkins, Craig, and Taylor, Charles Lewis. 2003. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Event Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research 40: 733–745.Google Scholar

Bond, Robert M., Fariss, Christopher J., Jones, Jason J., et al. 2012. “A 61-Million Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.” Nature 489: 295–298. DOI:10.1038/nature11421Google Scholar

Boulainne, Shelley 2009. “Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-analysis of Research.” Political Communication 26(2): 193–211.Google Scholar

Boulainne, Shelley. 2015. “Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Current Research.” Information, Communication & Society 18(5): 524–538.Google Scholar

Brandt, Patrick T., Bagozzi, Benjamin E., Orazio, Vito D’, Khan, Latifur, and Gao, Yang. 2017. “The Automated Discovery of Protest Stories From Text.” Paper presented at the “Democracy, the State and Protest” conference. Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus. May 11–12.Google Scholar

Bruns, Axel, Highfield, Tim, and Burgess, Jean. 2013. “The Arab Spring and Social Media Audiences: English and Arab Twitter Users and Their Networks.” American Behavioral Scientist 70(7): 871–898.Google Scholar

Brym, Robert, Godbout, Melissa, Hoffbauer, Andreas, Menard, Gabe, and Zhang, Tony H.. 2014. “Social Media in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising.” British Journal of Sociology 65(2): 266–292.Google Scholar

Cambria, Erik, Schuller, Bjorn, Xia, Yunqing, and Havasi, Catherine. 2013. “New Avenues in Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2): 15–21.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel and Cardoso, Gustavo (eds.). 2005. The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. Washington, D.C.: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar

Chang, Ray M., Kauffman, Robert J., and Kwon, Young O.. 2014. “Understanding the Paradigm Shift to Computational Social Science in the Presence of Big Data.” Decision Support Systems 63: 67–80.Google Scholar

Chen, Hsinchun, Chung, Wingyan, Qin, Jialun, Reid, Edna, Sageman, Marc, and Weimann, Gabriel. 2008. “Uncovering the Dark Web: A Case Study of Jihad on the Web.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(8): 1347–1359.Google Scholar

Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 2013. Introduction to Computational Social Science: Principles and Applications. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Conover, Michael D., Ferrara, Emilio, Menczer, Filippo, and Flammini, Alessandro 2013. “The Digital Evolution of Occupy Wall Street.” PLOS ONE 8(5): E64679.Google Scholar

Conover, Michael D., Goncalves, Bruno, Ratkikewicz, Jacob, Flammini, Alessandro, and Menczer, Filippo. 2011a. “Predicting the Political Alignment of Twitter Users.” 2011 IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk, and Trust and IEEE International Conference on Social Computing. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6113114Google Scholar

Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., and Menczer, F.. 2011b. “Political Polarization on Twitter.” Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://bit.ly/2Rmg5QVGoogle Scholar

Costello, , Matthew, J. Jenkins, Craig, and Aly, Hassan. 2015. “Bread, Justice or Opportunity? The Determinants of the Arab Awakening Protests.” World Development 67: 90–100.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Edward M., Robison, Kris, and Craig Jenkins, J.. 2018. “The Globalization of Contention: The Effects of International Media and Globalization on Protest, Terrorism and Guerrilla Warfare.” Department of Sociology, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Daniels, Jessie. 2009. Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Daniels, Jessie. 2018. “The Algorithmic Rise of the ‘Alt-Right.’” Contexts 17(1): 60–65.Google Scholar

Davenport, Christian and Ball, Patrick. 2002. “Views to a Kill: Exploring the Implications of Source Selection in the Case of Guatemalan State Terror, 1977–1995.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(3): 427–450.Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F.. 2012. Liberation Technology: Social Media and the Struggle for Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Diani, Mario. 2000. “Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real.” Information, Communication & Society 3(3): 386–401.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul, Nag, Manish, and Blei, David. 2013. “Exploiting Affinities Between Topic Modeling and the Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of Government Arts Funding in the U.S.” Poetics 41: 570–606.Google Scholar

Durso, , Rachel, J. Jenkins, Craig, Martin, Andrew, and Stearmer, Matthew. 2018. “How to Study Political Activists: A Petition Survey Approach.” Social Science Research 73: 207–220.Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer. 2013. “Studying Online Activism: The Effects of Sampling Design on Findings.” Mobilization 18(4): 389–406.Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer, Copeland, Lauren, and Bimber, Bruce. 2017. “Routing Around Organizations: Self-Directed Political Consumption.” Mobilization 22(2): 131–153.Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer and Kimport, Katrina. 2011. Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer, Kimport, Katrina, Prieto, Greg, Rush, Carly, and Reynoso, Kimberly. 2010. “Changing the World One Webpage at a Time: Conceptualizing and Explaining Internet Activism.” Mobilization 15(4): 425–446.Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer, Maher, Thomas V., and Elliott, Thomas. 2017. “Youth, Activism and Social Movements.” Sociology Compass 11: e12465. DOI:10.1111/soc4.12465Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer and Schussman, Alan. 2003. “The New Site of Activism: On-line Organizations, Movement Entrepreneurs and the Changing Location of Social Movement Decision-Making.” Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 24: 155–187.Google Scholar

Faris, Robert, Roberts, Hal, Etling, Bruce, Othman, Dalia, and Benkler, Yochai. 2015. “Score Another One for the Internet? The Role of the Networked Public Sphere in the U.S. Net Neutrality Policy Debate.” Berkman Center Research Publication #2015–4. Retrieved July 2, 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2563761Google Scholar

Fisher, Dana R. and Boekkooi, Marje. 2009. “Mobilizing Friends and Strangers: Understanding the Role of the Internet in the Step It Up Day of Action.” Information, Communication & Society 13(2): 193–208.Google Scholar

Foos, Florian, Kostadinov, Lyubomir, Marinov, Nikolay, and Schmiddelfennig, Frank. 2018. “Does Social Media Promote Civic Activism? A Field Experiment with a Civic Campaign.” King’s College London. Retrieved June 18,2018. www.florianfoos.net/research/activism/activism.htmlGoogle Scholar

Foster, Ian, Rayid Ghani, Ron S. Jarmin, Frauke Kreuter, and Lane, Julia. 2017. Big Data and Social Science. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Frenkel, Shera. 2018. “How a Fake Group on Facebook Created Real Protests.” New York Times, August 14. Retrieved September 5, 2018. https://nyti.ms/2WJSHlEGoogle Scholar

Gaby, Sarah and Caren, Neil. 2012. “Occupy Online: How Cute Old Men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 U.S. Users to OWS on Facebook.” Social Movement Studies 11: 367–374.Google Scholar

Garrett, R. Kelly. 2006. “Protest in an Information Society: A Review of Literature on Social Movements and New ICTs.” Information, Communication & Society 9: 202–224.Google Scholar

Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate.” Journal of Communication 59(4): 676–699.Google Scholar

Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Taddy, Matt. 2017. “Measuring Polarization in High-Dimensional Data: Method and Application to Congressional Speech.” Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved July 7, 2018. http://web.stanford.edu/~gentzkow/research/politext.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. “Annals of Innovation – Small Change – Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker, October 4. Retrieved January 12, 2018. https://bit.ly/1Csy7XOGoogle Scholar

Goel, Sarad, Anderson, Ashton, Hofman, Jake, and Watts, Duncan J.. 2016. “The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion.” Management Science 62(1): 180–196.Google Scholar

Golder, Scott A. and Macy, Michael W.. 2014. “Digital Footprints: Opportunities and Challenges for Online Social Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 129–152.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Bailon, Sandra, Borge-Holthoefer, Javier, and Moreno, Yamir. 2013. “Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion.” American Behavioral Scientist 57(7): 943–965.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Bailon, Sandra, Borge-Holthoefer, Javier, Rivero, Alejandro, and Moreno, Yamir. 2011. “The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network.” Scientific Reports 1, Article no. 197. Retrieved June 11, 2017. www.nature.com/articles/srep00197Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Bailon, Sandra and Wang, Ning. 2016. “Networked Discontent: The Anatomy of Protest Campaigns.” Social Networks 44: 95–104.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.Google Scholar

Griepentrog, Brian, Sean Marsh, Sidney C. Turner, and Evans, Sarah. 2016. “Using Social Marketing and Data Science to Make Government Smarter” pp. 246–265 in Michael Alvarez, R. (ed.) Computational Social Science. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grimmer, Justin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grimmer, Justin and King, Gary. 2011. “General Purpose Computer-Assisted Clustering and Conceptualization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 108(7): 2643–2650.Google Scholar

Grimmer, Justin and Stewart, Brandon. 2013. “Texts as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21(3): 267–297.Google Scholar

Han, Hahrie. 2016. “The Organizational Roots of Political Activism: Field Experiments on Creating a Relational Context.” American Political Science Review 110(2): 296–307.Google Scholar

Hargittai, Eszter and Sandvig, Christian (eds.). 2015. Digital Research Confidential: The Secrets of Studying Behavior Online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Marc, Vissers, Sara, Stolle, Dietlind, and Maheo, Valerie-Anne. 2010. “The Potential of Internet Mobilization: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Internet and Face-to-Face Mobilization Efforts.” Political Communication 27(4): 406–431.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Daniel J. and King, Gary. 2010. “A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science.” American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 229–247.Google Scholar

Howard, Philip N. and Hussain, Muzammil. 2011. “The Role of Digital Media.” Journal of Democracy 22(3): 35–48.Google Scholar

Hussain, Muzammil M. and Howard, Philip. 2013a. “What Best Explains Successful Protest Cascades? ICTs and the Fuzzy Causes of the Arab Spring.” International Studies Review 15: 48–66.Google Scholar

Hussain, Muzammil M. and Howard, Philip. 2013b. Democracies’ Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

InternetWorldStats. 2019. “Internet Growth Statistics.” Retrieved June 15, 2019. www.internetworldstats.com/emarketing.htmGoogle Scholar

Japec, Lilli, Kreuter, Frauke, Berg, Marcus, et al. 2015. AAPOR Report on Big Data. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: American Association of Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. Craig, Charles Lewis Taylor, Marianne Abbott, Maher, Thomas V., and Peterson, Lindsey. 2012. “The World Handbook of Political Indicators iv: An Introduction and Codebook.” Columbus, OH: Mershon Center for International Security Studies, The Ohio State University. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://sociology.osu.edu/worldhandbookGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, J. Craig, Charles Lewis Taylor, Marianne Abbott, Maher, Thomas V., and Peterson, Lindsey. 2018a. “Global Conflict Data: Introducing the World Handbook of Political Indicators iv.” SocArXiv Papers. DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/MXB9PGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, J. Craig, Charles Lewis Taylor, Marianne Abbott, Maher, Thomas V., and Peterson, Lindsey. 2018b. “Constructing Reliable Event Data: Human and Machine-Coding of World Handbook of Political Indicators iv.” Department of Sociology, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. Craig and Maher, Thomas V.. 2016. “What Should We Do about Source Selection in Event Data? Challenges, Progress, and Possible Solutions.” International Journal of Sociology 46: 42–57.Google Scholar

Jewkes, Stephen and Vukmanovic, Oleg. 2017. “Insight-Suspected Russian-backed Hackers Target Baltic Energy Networks.” Reuters, May 11. Retrieved June 18. 2019. https://reut.rs/2WeuT4XGoogle Scholar

Jost, John T., Barbera, Pablo, Bonneau, Richard, et al. 2018. “How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation and Social Networks.” Advances in Political Psychology 39(1): 85–118.Google Scholar

Karpf, David. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Eli and Lazarsfeld, Paul F.. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

King, Gary and Lowe, Will. 2003. “An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design.” International Interactions 57(3): 617–642.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2013. “How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression.” American Political Science Review 107(2): 326–343.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2014. “Reverse-Engineering Censorship in China: Randomized Experimentation and Participant Observation.” Science 345(6199): 1–10.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Pan, Jennifer, and Roberts, Margaret E.. 2017. “How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, not Engaged Argument.” American Political Science Review 111(3): 484–501.Google Scholar

Kitchin, Rob. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Kitchin, Rob and Gavin McArdle. 2016. “What Makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the Ontological Characteristics of 26 Datasets.” Big Data & Society January–June: 1–10.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Lorenzini, Jasmine, Wuest, Bruno, and Makarov, Peter. 2017. “Protesting Europeans in Time of Crisis: A Thirty Countries Study.” Paper presented at the “Democracy, the State and Protest” conference. Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus. May 11–12.Google Scholar

Lazer, David and Wojcik, Stefan. 2017. “Political Networks and Computational Social Science” in Victor, Jennifer N., Montgomery, Alexander H., and Lubell, Mark (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.9Google Scholar

Lazer, David and Radford, Jason. 2017. “Data Ex Machina: Introduction to Big Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 43: 19–39.Google Scholar

Lewis, Kevin, Gray, Kurt, and Meierenrich, Jens. 2014. “The Structure of Online Activism.” Sociological Science 1: 1–9.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Suzanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics 47(1): 42–101.Google Scholar

Luo, Jiebo, Amit Singhal, Stephen P. Etz, and Gray, Robert T.. 2004. “A Computational Approach to Determination of Main Subject Regions in Photographic Images.” Image and Vision Computing 22: 227–241.Google Scholar

Macfarquhar, Neil. 2016. “A Powerful Russian Weapon: The Spread of False Stories.” New York Times, August 18. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://nyti.ms/2bP9J94Google Scholar

Macintosh, Ann. 2004. “Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making.” Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2004. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://bit.ly/2WbnHqgGoogle Scholar

Maher, Thomas V. and Jenkins, J. Craig. 2018. “Getting Attention: Explaining the Difference Between National and International New Coverage of Contentious Events.” Department of Sociology, Purdue University, IN.Google Scholar

Marwell, Gerald and Oliver, Pamela. 1993. The Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCaughey, Martha and Michael Ayers, D.. 2003. Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Meier, Patrick. 2015. Digital Humanitarians: How Big Data Is Changing the Face of Humanitarian Response. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Meraz, Sharon and Papacharissi, Zizi. 2013. “Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt.” International Journal of Press/Politics 18(2): 138–166.Google Scholar

Metzger, Megan M. and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2017. “Social Media and EuroMaidan: A Review Essay.” Slavic Review 76(1): 169–191.Google Scholar

Meyer, David. 2015. The Politics of Protest: Social Movements in America, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mian, Atif and Rosenthal, Howard. 2016. “Introduction: Big Data in Political Economy.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2(7): 1–10.Google Scholar

Mohr, John W. and Bogdanov, Petko. 2013. “Introduction: Topic Models: What They Are and Why They Matter.” Poetics 41: 545–569.Google Scholar

Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Murdie, Amanda. 2013. “The Ties that Bind: A Network Analysis of Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations.” British Journal of Political Science 44: 1–27.Google Scholar

Musawi, Mohammed Ali. 2010. Cheering for Osama: How Jihadists Use Internet Discussion Forums. London: Quilliam Foundation.Google Scholar

Nakashima, Ellen and Warrick, Joby. 2012. “Stuxnet Was the Work of U.S. and Israeli Experts.” Washington Post, June 2. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://wapo.st/2HVXgRiGoogle Scholar

Nardulli, Peter F., Althaus, Scott L., and Hayes, Matthew. 2015. “A Progressive Supervised-Learning Approach to Generating Rich Civil Strife Data.” Sociological Methodology 45: 148–183.Google Scholar

Nekmat, Elmie, Gower, Karla K., Gonzenbach, William J., and Flanagin, Andrew J.. 2015. “Source Effects in the Micro-Mobilization of Collective Action via Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society 18(9): 1076–1091.Google Scholar

Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Sean P. 2010. “Crisis Early Warning and Decision Support: Contemporary Approaches and Thoughts on Future Research.” International Studies Review 12(1): 87–104.Google Scholar

O’Halloran, Sharyn, Samir Maskey, Geraldine McAllister, David K. Park, and Kaiping Chen. 2016. “Data Science and Political Economy: Applications to Financial Regulatory Structure.” RSF 2(7): 87–109.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1966. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Oser, Jennifer, Hooghe, Marc, and Marien, Sofie. 2013. “Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification.” Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 91–101.Google Scholar

Parmeggiani, Paolo. 2009. “Going Digital: Using New Technologies in Visual Sociology.” Visual Sociology 24: 71–81.Google Scholar

Pearce, Katy. 2015. “Democratizing Kompromat: The Affordances of Social Media for State-sponsored Harassment.” Information, Communication & Society 18: 1158–1174.Google Scholar

Perlroth, Nicole. 2017. “Russian Hackers Who Targeted Clinton Appear to Attack France’s Macron.” New York Times, April 24. Retrieved September 5, 2018. https://nyti.ms/2Mtmaw1Google Scholar

Perlroth, Nicole and Corkery, Michael. 2016. “North Korea Linked to Digital Attacks on Global Banks.” New York Times, 26 May. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://nyti.ms/27UI1OgGoogle Scholar

Polletta, Francesca, Chen, Pang Ching Bobby, Gardner, Beth Gharrity, and Motes, Alice. 2013. “Is the Internet Creating New Reasons to Protest?” pp. 17–36 in van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien, Roggeband, Conny, and Klandermans, Bert (eds.) The Future of Social Movement Research: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Processes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Raleigh, Clionagh, Linke, Andrew, Hegre, Havard, and Karisen, Joakim. 2010. “Introducing ACLED: An Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47: 651–660.Google Scholar

Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M. and Tingley, Dustin. 2016. “Navigating the Local Modes of Big Data: The Case of Topic Models” in Michael Alarvez, R. (ed.) Computational Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rohlinger, Deanna A. and Bunnage, Leslie. 2015. “Connecting People to Politics Over Time? Internet Communication Technology and Activist Persistence in MoveOn and the Tea Party Movement.” Information, Communication & Society 18(5): 539–552.Google Scholar

Salehyan, Idean, Hendrix, Cullen S., Hamner, Jesse, Case, Christina, Linebarger, Christopher, Stull, Emily, and Williams, Jennifer. 2012. “Social Conflict in Africa: A New Database.” International Interactions 38(4): 503–511.Google Scholar

Sanger, David E. 2017. The Perfect Weapon: War, Sabotage and Fear. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Sanovich, Sergey, Stukal, Denis, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2018. “Turning the Virtual Tables: Government Strategies for Addressing Online Opposition with an Application to Russia.” Comparative Politics 50(3): 435–482.Google Scholar

Schrodt, Philip A. 2012. “Precedents, Progress and Prospects in Political Event Data.” International Interactions 38(4): 546–569.Google Scholar

Schrodt, Philip A. and Gerner, Deborah J.. 2000 “Cluster-based Early Warning Indicators for Political Change in the Contemporary Levant.” American Political Science Review 94: 803–817.Google Scholar

Schrodt, Philip A., Gerner, Deborah J., and Yilmaz, Olmer. 2009. “Conflict and Mediation Event Observations (CAMEO): An Event Data Framework for a Post-Cold War World” pp. 287–304 in Bercovitch, Jacob and Gartner, Scott (eds.) International Conflict Mediation: New Approaches and Findings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Seber, George A. F. 1982. The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters, 2nd ed. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.Google Scholar

Shumate, Michelle and Dewitt, Lori. 2008. “The North/South Divide in NGO Hyperlink Networks.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 13: 405–428.Google Scholar

Shumate, Michelle and Lipp, Justin. 2008. “Connective Collective Action Online: An Examination of the Hyperlink Network Structure of an NGO Issue Network.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(1): 178–201.Google Scholar

Shumate, Michelle and Weber, Matthew S.. 2015. “The Art of Web Crawling for Social Science Research” pp. 201–222 in Hargittai, E. and Sandvig, C. (eds.) Digital Research Confidential: The Secrets of Studying Behavior Online. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sifry, Micah L. 2014. The Big Disconnect: Why the Internet Hasn’t Transformed Politics (Yet). New York: OR Books.Google Scholar

Singh, Abhishek N. and Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.. 2016. “New Media, Governance and Transparency in India” pp. 122–142 in Narayan, Sunetra Sen and Narayanan, Shalini (eds.) India Connected: Mapping the Impact of New Media. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar

Skirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of the Republican Party. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Slomczynski, , Kazimirez, J. Jenkins, Craig, Tomescu-Dubrow, Irina, et al. 2017. “SDR Master Box.” Retrieved June 15, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VWGF5Q, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:HIWud4wueVRsU8wTN+lySg==Google Scholar

Slomcyznski, Kazimirez, Tomescu-Dubrow, Irina, and Craig Jenkins, J.. 2016. Democratic Values and Protest Behavior: Harmonization of Data from International Survey Projects. Warsaw, Poland: IFiS.Google Scholar

Slomczynski, Kazimirez, Tomescu-Dubrow, Irina, and Craig Jenkins, J.. 2019. The Survey Data Recycling Project. Retrieved June 15, 2019. https://bit.ly/2ZC1xQeGoogle Scholar

Stearmer, S. Matthew. 2016. “Diaspora Social Movements in Cyberspace: Epistemological and Ethnographic Considerations.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Suh, Chan S., Vasi, Ion Bogdan, and Chang, Paul Y.. 2017. “How Social Media Matter: Repression and the Diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street Movement.” Social Science Research 65: 282–293.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2): 175–195.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.. 2007. Republic-com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sutherland, William J. 1996. Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tamkin, Emily. 2017. “Ten Years After the Landmark Attack on Estonia, Is the World Better Prepared for Cyber Threats?” Foreign Policy, April 27. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://bit.ly/2HCvY4 HGoogle Scholar

Theocharis, Yannis, Lowe, Will, van Deth, Jan, and Gema Garcia-Albacete, G. 2015. “Using Twitter to Mobilize Protest Action: Online Mobilization Patterns and Action Repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi Movements.” Information, Communication & Society 18(2): 202–220.Google Scholar

Theocharis, Yannis and Jan, van Deth. 2018. “The Continuous Expansion of Citizen Participation: A New Taxonomy.” European Political Science Review 10(1): 165–189.Google Scholar

Tomescu-Dubrow, Irina and Slomczynski, Kazimirez. 2016. “Harmonization of Cross-National Survey Projects on Political Behavior: Developing the Analytic Framework of Survey Data Recycling.” International Journal of Sociology 46(1): 58–72.Google Scholar

Tsai, Chun-Wei, Lai, Chin-Feng, Chao, Han-Chieh and Vasilokos, Athanasios V.. 2015. “Big Data Analytics: A Survey.” Journal of Big Data 2(21). DOI:10.1186/s40537-015-0030-3Google Scholar

Tsur, Oren, Calacci, Dan, and Lazer, David. 2015. “A Frame of Mind: Using Statistical Models for Detection of Framing and Agenda Setting Campaigns.” Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://aclweb.org/anthology/papers/P/P15/P15-1157/Google Scholar

Tucker, Joshua A., Yannis Theocharis, M. E. Roberts, and Barbera, Pablo. 2017. “From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media and Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 28(4): 46–59.Google Scholar

Tufecki, Zeynep. 2014. “Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls” pp. 505–514 in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014. Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1403/1403.7400.pdfGoogle Scholar

Tufecki, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tufecki, Zeynep and Wilson, Christopher. 2012. “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication 62(2): 363–379.Google Scholar

Unknown author. 2014. “GDELT and the Problem of Decontextualized Data.” Posted May 14. Retrieved June 15, 2019. https://bit.ly/2Omlhl4Google Scholar

Vaccari, Cristian, Valeriani, Augusto, Barbera, Pablo, et al. 2015. “Political Expressions and Action on Social Media: Exploring the Relationships Between Lower- and Higher-Threshold Political Activities among Twitter Users in Italy.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20: 221–239.Google Scholar

Vaillant, Gabriela G., Tyagi, Juhi, Akin, Idil Afife, Poma, Fernanda, Schwartz, Michael, and Arnout, van de Rijt. 2015. “A Field-Experimental Study of Emergent Mobilization in Online Collective Action.” Mobilization 21(3): 281–303.Google Scholar

van Aelst, Peter and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2002. “New Media, New Movements? The Role of the Internet in Shaping the ‘Anti-Globalization’ Movement.” Information, Communication & Society 5(4): 465–493.Google Scholar

van Laer, Jeroen. 2010. “Activists Online and Offline: The Internet as an Information Channel for Protest Demonstrations.” Mobilization 15(3): 347–366.Google Scholar

Vasi, Ion B., Strang, David, and Arnout, van de Rijt. 2014. “Tea and Sympathy: The Tea Party Movement and Republican Precommitment to Radical Conservatism in the 2011 Debt-Limit Crisis.” Mobilization 19(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Vasi, Ion B. and Suh, Chan S.. 2016. “Online Activities, Spatial Proximity, and the Diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street Movement in the United States.” Mobilization 21(2): 139–154.Google Scholar

Veltri, Giuseppe Alessandro. 2017. “Big Data Is Not Only About Data: The Two Cultures of Modelling.” Big Data & Society January–June: 1–4.Google Scholar

Vissers, Sara, Hooghe, Marc, Stolle, Dietlind, and Maheo, Valerie-Anne. 2012. “The Impact of Mobilization Media and Off-Line and Online Participation: Are Mobilization Effects Medium Specific?” Social Science Computer Review 30(2): 152–169.Google Scholar

Vissers, Sara and Stolle, Dietlind. 2014. “The Internet and New Modes of Political Participation: Online versus Offline Participation.” Information, Communication & Society 17(8): 937–955.Google Scholar

Wagner-Pacifici, Robin, Mohr, John W., and Breiger, Ronald L.. 2015. “Ontologies, Methodologies and New Uses of Big Data in the Social and Cultural Sciences.” Big Data & Society July–December: 1–15.Google Scholar

, Walgrave, Stefaan, W. Lance Bennett, Jeroen van Laer, and Breunig, Christian. 2011. “Multiple Engagements and Network Bridging in Contentious Politics: Digital Media Use of Protest Participants.” Mobilization 16(3): 325–349.Google Scholar

Walgrave, Steffan and Wouters, Ruud. 2014. “The Missing Link in the Diffusion of Protest: Asking Others.” American Journal of Sociology 109(6): 1670–1709.Google Scholar

Ward, Michael D., Andreas Beger, J. Cutler, and Radford, Benjamin. 2013. “Comparing GDELT and ICEWS Event Data.” Analysis 21: 267–297.Google Scholar

Warshaw, Christopher. 2016. “The Application of Big Data in Surveys to the Study of Elections, Public Opinion and Representation” pp. 27–51 in Michael Alvarez, R. (ed.) Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wikipedia. 2018. “Russian Interference in the 2016 Elections.” Retrieved September 5, 2018. https://bit.ly/2QKAsXMGoogle Scholar

Wikipedia. 2019. “Stormfront (website).” Retrieved June 18, 2019. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stormfront_(website)Google Scholar

Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2017. “How Social Media Is Changing Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(9): 1970–1991.Google Scholar

Adams, J. 2005. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, J., Clemens, E., and Orloff, A.. 2005. “Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology” in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Addams, J. 2002 [1915]. Democracy and Social Ethics. Chicago: Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E., and Su, Y.. 2010. “The Political Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 287–307.Google Scholar

Beamish, T. 2015. Community at Risk? Biodefense and the Collective Search for Security. : Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A.. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.Google Scholar

Berezin, M. 1999. “Political Belonging: Emotion, Nation, and Identity in Fascist Italy” pp. 355–377 in Steinmetz, G. (ed.) State/Culture: State-formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Billington, J. H. 2007 [1980]. Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E.. 2007 [1999]. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E.. 2005. “The New Spirit of Capitalism.” International Journal of Political and Cultural Sociology 18: 161–188.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L.. 1983. “Finding One’s Way in Social Space: A Study Based on Games.” Social Science Information 22: 631–680.Google Scholar

Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L.. 2006 [1991]. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1984 [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P.. 1993 [1985]. “Principles for a Sociology of Cultural Works” in The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P.. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Edited and with an introduction by John Thompson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L., and Farage, S.. 1994 [1991]. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory 12(1): 1–18.Google Scholar

Brint, S. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brubaker, R. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Callon, M. 1998. “The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics” pp. 1–57 in Callon, M. (ed.) The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Camic, C. 2011. “Bourdieu’s Cleft Sociology of Science.” Minerva 49: 275–293.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L. and Pedersen, O. K.. 2014. The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, S. D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Post-colonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Champagne, P. 2005. “‘Making the People Speak’: On the Social Uses of and Reactions to Public Opinion Polls” pp. 111–132 in Wacquant, Loïc (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar

Christin, O. 2005. “Ancien Régime Ballots: A Double Historicization of Electoral Practice” pp. 91–110 in Wacquant, Loïc (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu and Democratic Politics. London: Polity.Google Scholar

Cohn, B. S. 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, A. J. 1998 [1886–1930]. The Voice of Anna Julia Cooper: Including a Voice from the South and Other Important Essays, Papers, and Letters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Davies, W. 2014. The Limits of Neoliberalism. New York: SAGE.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 2011 [1922]. Human Nature and Conduct. Minneola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B.. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists and the Transformation of Latin-American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dulio, D. A. 2004. For Better or Worse?: How Political Consultants Are Changing Elections in the United States. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. 1992 [1890–1900]. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen Fields. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M.. 1963 [1903]. Primitive Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Emigh, R., Riley, D., and Ahmed, P.. 2016. Changes in Censuses from Imperialist to Welfare States: How Societies and States Count. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J.. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99(6): 1411–1454.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. and Stevens, N.. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology 49: 401–436.Google Scholar

Evans, P. B., Skocpol, T., and Rueschemeyer, D (eds.). 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eyal, G. 2006. The Disenchantment of the Orient: Expertise in Arab Affairs and the Israeli State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Eyal, G. and Buccholz, L.. 2010. “From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions.” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 117–137.Google Scholar

Fligstein, N. and Mara-Drita, I.. 1996. “How to Make a Market: Reflections on the Attempt to Create a Single Market in the European Union.” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1–33.Google Scholar

Fligstein, N. and Stone Sweet, A.. 2002. “Constructing Politics and Markets: An Institutionalist Account of European Integration.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 1206–1243.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Foucault, M.. 2009. Economists and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fourcade, M. 2011. “Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’.” American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1721–1777.Google Scholar

Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. 2001. “Politics, Institutional Structures, and the Rise of Economics: A Comparative Study.” Theory and Society 30: 397–447.Google Scholar

Franklin, B. 1970 [1751]. “Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 13(4): 469–475.Google Scholar

Geva, D. 2013. Conscription, Family, and the Modern State: A Comparative Study of France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Geva, D.. 2015. “Selective Service, the Gender-Ordered Family, and the Rational Informality of the American State.” American Journal of Sociology 121(1): 171–204.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. 1987. Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Go, J. and Krause, M.. 2016. “Fielding Transnationalism: An Introduction.” Sociological Review Monographs 64(2): 6–30.Google Scholar

Goldstone, J. A. (ed.). 2003. States, Parties, and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., and Polletta, F. (eds.). 2001. Passionate Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. L. 1997. Gender and the Politics of Welfare Reform: Mothers’ Pensions in Chicago, 1911–1929. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gorski, P. 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gramsci, A. 1971 [1929–1935]. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Grossman, M. 2009. “Going Pro? Political Campaign Consulting and the Professional Model.” Journal of Political Marketing 8(2): 81–104.Google Scholar

Groves, J. M. 2001. “Animal Rights and the Politics of Emotion: Folk Constructs of Emotions in the Animal Rights Movement” pp. 212–229 in Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., and Polletta, F. (eds.) Passionate Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Hirschman, D. and Berman, E.. 2014. “Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economists.” Socio-Economic Review 12(4): 1–33.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. (ed.). 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. M. 1997. The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. M.. 2005. “Culture, Knowledge, and Politics” pp. 115–134 in Janoski, T. and Misra, J. (eds.) Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jasper, J. M.. 2011. “Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 285–303.Google Scholar

Jung, M. and Kwon, Y.. 2013. “Theorizing the US Racial State: Sociology Since Racial Formation.” Sociology Compass 7(11): 927–940.Google Scholar

Karabel, J. 1996. “Towards a Theory of Intellectuals and Politics.” Theory and Society 25: 205–233.Google Scholar

Krause, M. 2016. “‘Western Hegemony’ in the Social Sciences: Fields and Model Systems.” Sociological Review Monographs 64(2): 194–211.Google Scholar

Lamont, M. 2012. “Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Annual Review of Sociology 38: 201–221.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World” pp. 141–170 in Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M. (eds.) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Laurison, D. 2014. “Positions and Position-Takings among Political Producers: The Field of American Political Consultants” in Grenfell, M. and Lebaron, F. (eds.) Bourdieu and Data Analysis. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Laurison, D.. 2015a. “The Right to Speak: Differences in Political Engagement among the British Elite.” The Sociological Review 63(2): 349–372. DOI:10.1111/1467-954X.12294Google Scholar