Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:39:51.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - The Good, the Bland, and the Ugly

Volunteering, Civic Associations, and Participation in Politics

from IV - Civil Society: The Roots and Processes of Political Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2020

By
Sara Compion  and
Thomas Janoski
Edited by
Thomas Janoski ,
Cedric de Leon ,
Joya Misra  and
Isaac William Martin
Thomas Janoski
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Cedric de Leon
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Joya Misra
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Isaac William Martin
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

The value of volunteering and associational groups for social political life has long interested scholars studying modern democratic societies. Since Alexis de Tocqueville published his seminal work on Democracy in America in the 1830s (2001), much focus has been on the good that volunteering in civic associations does for fostering pro-social behavior and for building public participatory processes in democratic governments. A more recent and critical view asserts that the work of civic associations can also be socially corrosive, paternalistic, intolerant of outsiders, geared toward corporate self-interest, and actively antidemocratic. In addition, much volunteering in civic groups is shallow, menial, apolitical social activity that holds little, if any, transformative social potential.

Keywords

volunteeringcivic associationsparticipationdemocratic/ anti-democratic movements
Type
Chapter
Information
The New Handbook of Political Sociology , pp. 681 - 714
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, Rebecca. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addison, John T., Teixeira, Paulino, and Zwick, Thomas. 2010. “German Works Councils and the Anatomy of Wages.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 63(2): 247–270.Google Scholar
Akintola, Olagoke. 2006. “Gendered Home-based Care in South Africa: More Trouble for the Troubled.” African Journal of AIDS Research 5(3): 237–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akintola, Olagoke. 2008. “Defying All Odds: Coping with the Challenges of Volunteer Caregiving for Patients with AIDS in South Africa.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 63(4): 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, Jeffrey. 2006. The Civil Sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney. 1965. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
America Speaks. 2014. “America Speaks: A Legacy of Critical Innovations in Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Engagement.” Washington, D.C. Retrieved April 14, 2019. http://ncdd.org/rc/wp-content/uploads/AmericaSpeaks_Legacy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Backer, Larry Catá. 2017. “Commentary on the New Charity Undertakings Law.” The China Nonprofit Review 9(2): 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2005. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo and Ganuza, Ernesto. 2016. Popular Democracy: The Paradox of Participation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, Delia. 2013. The Simple Art of Voting: The Cognitive Shortcuts of Italian Voters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, Delia and Bearman, Peter. 2007. “Dynamics of Political Polarization.” American Sociological Review 72: 784–811.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, Delia and Diani, Mario. 2007. “The Integrative Power of Civic Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 113(3): 735–780.Google Scholar
Baldassarri, Delia and Gelman, Andrew. 2008. “Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology 114(2): 408–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldassarri, Delia and Goldberg, Amir. 2014. “Neither Ideologues nor Agnostics: Alternative Voters’ Belief System in an Age of Partisan Politics.” American Journal of Sociology 120(1): 45–95.Google Scholar
BBC. 2018. “Germany Coalition Deal Reached After Months of Wrangling.” BBC News February 7. Retrieved March 15, 2019. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42973419Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell, Greene, Steven, and Huckfeldt, Robert. 2002. “The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 57–73.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert, Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William, Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven. 1996 [1985]. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Paul, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee, William. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boesten, Jelke, Mdee, Anna, and Cleaver, Frances. 2011. “Service Delivery on the Cheap? Community-based Workers in Development Interventions.” Development in Practice 21(1): 41–58.Google Scholar
Bolin, Niklas, Aylott, Nicholas, von dem Berge, Benjamin, and Poguntke, Thomas. 2017. “Patterns of Intra-Party Democracy across the World” pp. 158–184 in Scarrow, Susan, Webb, Paul, and Poguntke, Thomas (eds.) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borgonovi, Francesca. 2008. “Divided We Stand, United We Fall: Religious Pluralism, Giving and Volunteering.” American Sociological Review 73(1): 105–128.Google Scholar
Chopik, William, O’Brien, Ed, and Konrath, Sara. 2017. “Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48(1): 23–38.Google Scholar
CIVICUS. 2018. State of Civil Society Report 2018. London, Washington, D.C., Geneva, and Johannesburg: CIVICUS.Google Scholar
Clawson, Dan. 2003. The Next Upsurge: Labor and the New Social Movements. Ithaca, New York: ILR of Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Legitimacy” pp. 17–34 in Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip (eds.) The Good Polity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy” pp. 67–92 in Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Compion, Sara. 2017. “The Joiners: Active Voluntary Association Membership in Twenty African Countries.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28(3): 1270–1300.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian and Jennings, Jeremy. 2004. “The Third Democracy: Tocqueville’s Views of America after 1840.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 391–404.Google Scholar
Curtis, James, Baer, Douglas, and Grabb, Edward. 1992. “Voluntary Association Membership in Fifteen Countries: A Comparative Analysis.” American Sociological Review 57: 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, James, Baer, Douglas, and Grabb, Edward. 2001. “Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies.” American Sociological Review 66: 783–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2001. Writings on Empire and Slavery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis. 2003 [1835 and 1840]. Democracy in America and Two Essays on America. Translated by Isaac Kramnick. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dekker, Paul and Halman, Loek. 2003. “Values and Volunteering” pp. 1–17 in Dekker, Paul and Halman, Loek (eds.) The Values of Volunteering. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul and Garip, Filiz. 2012. “Network Effects and Social Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology 38: 93–118.Google Scholar
Druckman, James, Levendusky, Matthew, and McLain, Audrey. 2017. “No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Inter-Personal Discussions.” American Journal of Political Science 62(1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James and Nelson, Kjersten. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 729–745.Google Scholar
Edwards, Michael. 2009. Civil Society, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 2011. Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare’s End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 2013. The Politics of Volunteering. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2008. Employee Representatives in an Enlarged Europe, 2 volumes. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Fantasia, Rick and Voss, Kim. 2004. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Leela (ed.). 2018. Feminists Rethink the Neoliberal State: Inequality, Exclusion and Change. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 2011. When the People Speak. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James and Laslett, Peter (eds.). 2003. Debating Deliberative Democracy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. and Luskin, Robert C.. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40(3): 284–298.Google Scholar
Fleming, Ted. 2000. “Habermas on Civil Society, Life World and System: Unearthing the Social in Transformation Theory.” Teachers College Record. Retrieved January 27, 2002. www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10877Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2006. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon and Wright, Erich Olin (eds.). 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald and Putnam, Robert. 1999. “The Growth of Voluntary Associations in America, 1840–1940.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 24(4): 511–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, Nectar. 2017. “Why Foreign NGOs Are Struggling with New Chinese Law: Thousands Could Be Operating in a Risky Legal Limbo.” South China Morning Post. Retrieved June 13, 2017 . https://bit.ly/2Y5G7KkGoogle Scholar
Geng, Changjuan and Meijs, Lucas. 2016. “The Democratic Implications of NPOs and the Control Strategy of the State.” The China Nonprofit Review 8(1): 3–26.Google Scholar
Goncharenko, Roman. 2017. “NGOs in Russia: Battered, but Unbowed.” Deutschewelle. Retrieved November 11, 2017. https://bit.ly/2WAmcCMGoogle Scholar
Gulik, Gauri van. 2018. “Turning Orbán’s Hateful Rhetoric into Reality” Amnesty International. Retrieved March 23, 2019. https://bit.ly/2YawmKOGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 2002. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan and Lee, Taeku. 2011. Why Americans Don’t Join the Party: Race, Immigration and the Failure (of Political Parties) to Engage the Electorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Helsley, Robert W. and Strange, William C.. 1998. “Private Government.” Journal of Public Economics 69(2): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henneghan, Tom. 2019. “Germany Continues Payments to Churches a Century after Deciding to Stop.” National Catholic Reporter. February 13. Retrieved April 15, 2019. https://bit.ly/30ovuUdGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander. 2018. Politics at Work: How Companies Turn their Workers into Lobbyists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilger, Jeffrey. 2010. “The State of Participatory Democratic Theory.” New Political Science 32(1): 43–63.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, David. 1998. “Civil Society in South Africa: Learning from Gender Themes.” World Development 26(2): 227–238.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Mendez, Jeannette, and Osborn, Tracy. 2004. “Disagreement, Ambivalence and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks.” Political Psychology 25: 65–95.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 2008. Inventing Human Rights. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 2003. “Modernization and Volunteering” pp. 55–70 in Dekker, Paul and Halman, Loek (eds.) The Values of Volunteering. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 2018. Cultural Evolutions: People’s Motivations are Changing, and Reshaping the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Baker, Wayne. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 19–51.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary R. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andrew. 2009. “China Still Presses Crusade against Falun Gong.” New York Times, April 27.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 1998. Citizenship and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 2009. “The Spirit of the Civil Sphere: Activating Static Conceptions of Volunteerism and Citizenship.” Comparative Social Research 26: 263–293.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 2010. “The Dynamic Processes of Volunteering in Civil Society: A Group and Multi-Level Approach.” Journal of Civil Society 6(2): 99–118.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas and Wilson, John. 1995. “Pathways to Volunteerism: Family Socialization and Status Transmission Models.” Social Forces 74(1): 271–292.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas, Wilson, John, and Musick, Marc. 1998. “Being Volunteered: A LISREL Analysis of Citizenship Attitudes and Behaviors as Causes of Volunteering.” Sociological Forum 13(3): 495–519.Google Scholar
Jeffres, Leo, Atkin, David, and Neuendorf, Kimberly. 2002. “A Model Linking Community Activity and Communication with Political Attitudes and Involvement in Neighborhoods.” Political Communication 19: 387–421.Google Scholar
Kardos, Peter, Leidner, Bernhard, Pléh, Csaba, Soltész, Péter, and Unoka, Zsolt. 2017. “Empathetic People Have More Friends.” Social Networks 50: 1–5.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu and Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Edward and Berry, Jonathan. 2003. The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat and What to Buy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kew, Darren and Oshikoya, Modupe. 2014. “Escape from Tyranny: Civil Society and Democratic Struggles in Africa” pp. 7–23 in Obadare, Ebenezer (ed.) The Handbook of Civil Society in Africa. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David, Pappi, Franz, Broadbent, Jeffrey, and Tsujinaka, Yutaka. 1996. Comparing Policy Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Konrath, Sara, O’Brien, Edward, and Hsing, Courtney. 2011. “Changes in Dispositional Empathy in American College Students over Time: A Meta-Analysis.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 15(2): 180–918.Google Scholar
Krause, Monika. 2014. The Good Project: Humanitarian Relief NGOs and the Fragmentation of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lang, Achim. 2016. “Germany” pp. 29–46 in Fierlbeck, Kathrine and Palley, Howard (eds.) Comparative Health Care Federalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1960 [1948]. The Peoples’ Choice, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lecher, Wolfgang, Platzer, Hans-Wolfgang, Rub, Stefan, and Weiner, Klaus-Peter. 2002. European Works Councils: Negotiated Europeanisation: Between Statutory Framework and Social Dynamics. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lecher, Wolfgang, Platzer, Hans-Wolfgang, Rub, Stefan, and Weiner, Klaus-Peter. 2015. “Realizing the Promise of Public Participation in an Age of Inequality” pp. 247–250 in Lee, Caroline, Walker, Edward, and McQuarrie, Michael (eds.) Democratizing Inequalities. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Caroline W., McQuarrie, Michael, and Walker, Edward T.. 2015. “Rising Participation and Declining Democracy” pp. 3–23 in Lee, Caroline, McQuarrie, Michael, and Walker, Edward (eds.) Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Lorie, Gossett, Loril, and Kramer, Michael. 2013. “New Directions in Volunteering” pp. 407–416 in Kramer, Michael, Lewis, Laurie, and Gossett, Loril (eds.) Volunteering and Communication: Studies from Multiple Contexts. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lichterman, Paul and Eliasoph, Nina. 2014. “Civic Action.” American Journal of Sociology 120(3): 798–863.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments” pp. 1–64 in Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Cheng-shan Frank and Lucas, Laura. 2005. “The Political Independent: Cross-pressures and the Rejection of Party Identifications” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Convention in San Francisco. September 1–14.Google Scholar
Lizza, Ryan. 2007. “The Relaunch: Can Barack Obama Catch Hillary Clinton?” New Yorker, November 26: 72–84.Google Scholar
Lizza, Ryan. 2008. “The Iron Lady: The Clinton Campaign Returns from the Dead, Again” New Yorker, March 17: 36–66.Google Scholar
Long, Ya. 2013. “Constructing Transnational Actorhood: The Emergence and Transformation of the AIDs Movement in China, 1989–2012.” Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Lührmann, Anna, Dahlum, Sirianne, Lindberg, Staffan I., et al. 2018. Democracy for All? V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2018. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg and the European Union.Google Scholar
Lukensmeyer, Carolyn, Goldman, Joe, Brigham, Steven. 2005. “A Town Meeting for the Twenty-First Century” pp. 154–163 in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J., Parkinson, John, et al. 2012. “A Systematic Approach to Deliberative Democracy” pp. 1–26 in Mansbridge, Jane and Parkinson, John (eds.) Deliberative Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mattes, Robert. 2007. “Democracy without People: Political Institutions and Citizenship in the New South Africa.” Afrobarometer Working Paper Series, No. 82. Retrieved October 10, 2013. www.afrobarometer.orgGoogle Scholar
Mbembe, Achille. 2000. On Private Indirect Government. Cape Town: Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, Michael. 2015. “No Contest: Participatory Technologies and the Transformation of Urban Authority” pp. 83–101 in Lee, Caroline, McQuarrie, Michael, and Walker, Edward (eds.) Democratizing Inequality: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. 1966. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchial Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Susan L. 2014. Making Policy Public: Participatory Bureaucracy in American Democracy. New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moyo, Sam. 2008. African Land Questions, Agrarian Transitions and the State: Contradictions of Neo-liberal Land Reforms. Oxford: African Books Collective.Google Scholar
Mueller, Steffen. 2012. “Works Councils and Establishment Productivity.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 65(4): 880–898.Google Scholar
Musick, Marc and Wilson, John. 2008. Volunteers: A Social Profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2002a. “The Consequences for Cross-cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 838–855.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2002b. “Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practices.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 111–126.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana and Martin, Paul. 2001. “Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media.” American Political Science Review 95(1): 97–114.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana and Mondak, Jeffery. 2006. “The Workplace as a Context for Cross-cutting Political Discourse.” Journal of Politics 68(1): 140–155.Google Scholar
Neocosmos, Michael. 2017. “Can NGOs Play an Emancipatory Role in Contemporary Africa?” Chapter 1 in Matthews, Sally (ed.) NGOs And Social Justice in South Africa and Beyond. Pietermaritzburg: University of Kwazulu-Natal Press.Google Scholar
Niedermayer, Oskar. 2000. “Parties and the Party System” pp. 166–187 in Helms, Ludger (ed.) Institutions and Institutional Change in the Federal Republic of Germany. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nilson, Sten S. 2002. “Half a Century of Cross-Pressures: A Thesis Reconsidered.” Political Studies 50(2): 354–161.Google Scholar
Oskamp, Stuart and Schultz, P. W.. 2005. Attitudes and Opinions, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Painter, Kimberly. 2013. “Deliberative Democracy in Action: Exploring the 2012 City of Austin Bond Development Process.” Applied Research Project, Texas State University.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York:Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert with Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Rafaella. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Matt. 2017. Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Qvortrup, Matt. 2018. Government by Referendum. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Paul B. and Selbee, L. Kevin. 2003. “Do People Who Volunteer Have a Distinctive Ethos” pp. 91–109 in Dekker, Paul and Halman, Loek (eds.) The Values of Volunteering. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2018. “Election Thumping on the Cards for Merkel Coalition Parties: Polls.” Reuters World News, October 18. Retrieved April 15, 2019. https://reut.rs/2XwMwgOGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Geoffrey. 2000. German Politics Today. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joshua, Leeper, Thomas, and Druckman, James. 2016. “Do Disagreeable Political Discussion Networks Undermine Attitude Strength?” Political Psychology 39(2): 479–494.Google Scholar
Rotolo, Thomas and Wilson, John. 2004. “What Happened to the Long Civic Generation?” Explaining Cohort Differences in Volunteerism.” Social Forces 82: 1091–1121.Google Scholar
Rotolo, Thomas and Wilson, John. 2014. “Social Heterogeneity and Volunteering in US Cities.” Sociological Forum 29(2): 429–452.Google Scholar
Ruiter, Stijn and de Graaf, Nan Dirk. 2006. “National Context, Religiosity, and Volunteering: Results from 53 Countries.” American Sociological Review 71: 191–210.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester, Wojciech Sokolowski, S., and Associates. 2004. Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 2015. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay, Brady, Henry, and Verba, Sidney. 2018. Unequal and Unrepresented: Political Inequality and the People’s Voice in the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry. 2013. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schofer, Evan and Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion. 2001. “The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review 66: 806–828.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1953. The TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1997. “The Tocqueville Problem: Civic Engagement in American Democracy.” Social Science History 21(2): 455–479.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2004. “Voice and Inequality: The Transformation of American Civic Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 3–20.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris (eds.). 1999. “Making Sense of the Civic Engagement Debate” pp. 1–23 in Skocpol, Theda and Fiorina, Morris (eds.) Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2016. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smilde, David. 2011. “Participation, Politics, and Culture – Emerging Fragments of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Democracy” pp. 127 in Smilde, David and Hellinger, Daniel (eds.) Venezuela’s Bolivarian Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Staab, Silke. 2009. “Families, Women and Volunteers: The Limits of Unpaid Care in Development Context.” Peripherie 29(114–115): 194–214.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1993. “West European Labor in Transition: Sweden and Germany Compared.” World Politics 46(1): 23–49.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520.Google Scholar
Thorpe, Charles. 2010. “Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy.” Minerva 48: 389–411.Google Scholar
Trajan, J. Ricardo. 2016. Participatory Democracy in Brazil. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Lowell. 1998. Fighting for Partnership: Labor and Politics in Unified Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
United States, Bureau of Labor Statistics (US-BLS). 2016. “Volunteering in the United States, 2015.” Economic News Release. February 25. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved July 7, 2018. www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htmGoogle Scholar
United States, Internal Revenue Service (US-IRS). 2018. “Tax Information for Churches and Religious Organizations.” Retrieved August 27, 2018. https://bit.ly/2bkN5ItGoogle Scholar
van Biezen, Ingrid and Piccio, Daniela Romee. 2013. “Shaping Intra-party Democracy: On the Legal Regulation of Internal Party Organizations” pp. 27–48 in Cross, William and Katz, Richard (eds.) The Challenges of Intraparty Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Gulik, Gauri. 2018. “Turning Orbán’s Hateful Rhetoric into Reality.” Amnesty International. https://bit.ly/2YawmKOGoogle Scholar
van Ingen, Erik and Dekker, Paul. 2011. “Changes in the Determinants of Volunteering.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40: 6842–6702.Google Scholar
van Ingen, Erik and Wilson, John. 2017. “‘I Volunteer, Therefore I am’: Factors Affecting Volunteer Role identity.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 46: 129–146.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward T. 2014. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward, McQuarrie, Michael, and Lee, Caroline. 2015. “Rising Participation and Declining Democracy” pp. 3–26 in Lee, Caroline, Walker, Edward, and McQuarrie, Michael (eds.) Democratizing Inequalities. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, Tina. 2002. “The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in African Development” pp. 230–252 in Belshaw, Deryke and Livingstone, Arthur Ian (eds.) Renewing Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policy, Performance and Prospects. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiertz, Dingeman. 2016. “Segregation in Civic Life: Ethnic Sorting and Mixing across Voluntary Associations.” American Sociological Review 81(4): 800–827.Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 2000. “Volunteering.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 215–240.Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 2012. “Volunteerism Research: A Review Essay.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41: 176–212.Google Scholar
Wilson, John and Janoski, Thomas. 1995. “The Contribution of Religion to Volunteer Work.” Sociology of Religion 56(2): 137–152.Google Scholar
Wilson, John and Musick, Marc. 1997. “Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work.” American Sociological Review 62(5): 694–713.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 2004. Saving America? Faith-based Services and the Future of Civil Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 2011. Remaking America: Heartland Middle America since 1950. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 2018. Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ye. 2003. “China’s Emerging Civil Society.” Brookings Institution, Working Papers by CEAP Visiting Fellows, Washington, D.C. Retrieved April 23, 2018. https://brook.gs/2V3NwImGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan (ed.). 2005. The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×