Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:49:30.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - On Sen on the Capability of Capabilities

The Story of a Not-For-Profit Enterprise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

By
Gay Meeks
Edited by
Flavio Comim ,
Shailaja Fennell  and
P. B. Anand
Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Shailaja Fennell
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
P. B. Anand
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
New Frontiers of the Capability Approach , pp. 12 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

++Agarwal, B., Humphreys, J. and Robeyns, I. (2003). ‘Exploring the challenges of Amartya Sen's work and ideas: An introduction’. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3): 3–12.Google Scholar
Anand, P., Santos, C. and Smith, R. (2009). ‘The measurement of capabilities’. Chapter 16 in Basu, K. and Kanbur, R. (eds.). Volume I: 283–310.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
++Atkinson, A. B. (1999). ‘The contributions of Amartya Sen to welfare economics’. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2): 173–90.Google Scholar
Basu, K. and Kanbur, R. (eds.) (2009). Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honour of Amartya Sen. Volumes I and II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2009). ‘Agency goals, adaptation and capability sets’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1): 3–19.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. and Vizard, P. (2011). ‘“Operationalizing” the capability approach as a basis for equality and human rights monitoring in twenty-first-century Britain’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1): 91–119.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. (2006a). ‘The capability approach’. In Clark, D. A. (ed.) (2006b): 32–45.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. (ed.) (2006b). The Elgar Companion to Development Studies. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. (ed.) (2012). Adaptation, Poverty and Development: The Dynamics of Subjective Well-Being. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A. and Meeks, J. G. (2016). ‘What of equality?’ Working paper.Google Scholar
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M. and Alkire, S. (eds.) (2008). The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cord, R. (ed.) (2017). The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics. Volume 2. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. S. (2005). ‘What do economists analyse and why: Values or facts?’ Economics and Philosophy, 21(02): 221–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P. S. (2007). ‘Reply to Putnam and Walsh’. Economics and Philosophy, 23(3): 365–72.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. S. (2009). ‘Facts and values in modern economics’. Chapter 22 in Kincaid, H. and Ross, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 580–640.Google Scholar
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
++Evans, P. (2002). ‘Collective capabilities, culture and Amartya Sen's Development as Freedom’. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2): 54–60.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1958). ‘Moral beliefs’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 59: 83–104.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and Vices: and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Foot, P. (2001). Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
++Gasper, D. and van Staveren, I. (2003). ‘Development as freedom – and what else?’ Feminist Economics, 9(2–3): 137–61.Google Scholar
Gasper, D. (2007). ‘Adding links – Dialogue, adding persons, and adding structures: Using Sen's frameworks’. Feminist Economics, 13(1): 67–85.Google Scholar
Glover, J. (1990). Utilitarianism and Its Critics. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. (2011). ‘About freedom and its multiple dimensions’. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Gotoh, R. and Dumouchel, P. (2009). Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graaff, J. de V. (1957). Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. (1991). ‘Benevolence’. Chapter 1 in Meeks, J. G. (ed.): 7–11.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (2012). Preference, Value, Choice and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H. and Wang, S. (2017). ‘Social foundations of world happiness’. Chapter 2 in Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. and Sachs, J. D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. and Sachs, J. D. (eds.) (2017). World Happiness Report 2017. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Available at: http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2016/Google Scholar
++Hill, M. T. (2003). ‘Development as empowerment’. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3): 117–35.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, S. and Tiwari, M. (eds.) (2014). The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
++Klamer, A. (1989). ‘A conversation with Amartya Sen’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1): 135–50.Google Scholar
Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Leijonhuvud, A. (1973). ‘Life among the Econ’. Western Economic Journal, 11(3): 327–37.Google Scholar
Meeks, J. G. (1985). ‘Utility in economics: A survey of the literature’. Chapter 2 in Turner, C. F. and Martin, E. (eds.) Surveying Subjective Phenomena. Volume 2. US National Science Foundation, New York: Russell Sage Foundation: 41–92.Google Scholar
Meeks, J. G. (ed.) (1991). Thoughtful Economic Man: Essays on Rationality, Moral Rules and Benevolence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meeks, J. G. (2017). ‘Amartya Sen (1933–)’. Chapter 47 in Cord, R. (ed.): 1045–78.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. London: Fraser's magazine.Google Scholar
Peter, F. and Schmid, H. B. (eds.) (2007) Rationality and Commitment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. (2005). ‘Sen on freedom and gender justice’. Feminist Economics, 11(3): 149–64.Google Scholar
Qizilbash, M. (2011). ‘Sugden's critique of the capability approach’. Utilitas, 23(1): 25–51.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1975). ‘A Kantian concept of equality’. Cambridge Review: February.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Kelly, E. (ed.). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2016). ‘Capabilitarianism’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3): 397–414.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2009). Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M. and Ross, D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Third edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1967). ‘The nature and classes of prescriptive judgements’. The Philosophical Quarterly, 17(66): 44–62.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970a). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970b). ‘The impossibility of a Paretian Liberal’. Journal of Political Economy, 78(1): 152–57.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1973). On Economic Inequality. (Expanded edition 1997 with substantial annexe by J. E. Foster and A. K. Sen). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1974). ‘Rawls versus Bentham: An axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem’. Theory and Decision, 4(3–4): 301–9.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1977). ‘Rational Fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory’. [The Herbert Spencer Lecture 1976]. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4): 317–44.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1980a). ‘Equality of what?’ Chapter 6 in McMurrin, S. M. (ed.). The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Volume 1. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 195–220.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. *(1980b). ‘Description as choice’. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 32(3): 353–69.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982a). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982b). ‘Rights and agency’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11(1): 3–39.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1983). ‘Liberty and social choice’. Journal of Philosophy, 80(1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985a). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Republished Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985b). ‘Goals, commitment and identity’. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1: 341–5.Google Scholar
+Sen, A. K. (1985c). ‘Well-being, freedom and agency: the Dewey Lectures 1984’. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4): 169–221.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1987). The Standard of Living. (Hawthorn, G. (ed.), with comments by Muelbauer, J., Kanbur, R., Hart, K. and Williams, B.). [The 1985 Tanner Lectures, Clare Hall]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1991a). ‘Beneconfusion’. Chapter 2 in Meeks, J. G. (ed.): 12–16.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1991b). ‘Freedom and social choice’, The Arrow Lectures, published in revised version in Sen, A. K. (2002), Part VI.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1997). ‘Maximisation and the act of choice’. Econometrica, 65(4): 745–79.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1998). ‘Amartya Sen – Biographical’. Stockholm: Nobel Foundation. Available at www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1998/sen-bio.html.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999a). ‘The possibility of social choice’. American Economic Review, 89(3): 349–78. [1998 Nobel Lecture, Stockholm: The Nobel Foundation. Available at www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1998/sen-lecture.html.]Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1999b). Development as Freedom. New York, NY: Knopf. Oxford and Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2002). Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2004). ‘Disability and justice’. Keynote speech at the World Bank 2004 conference on ‘Disability and Inclusive Development’. Available at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-SdEGXlABLwJ:siteresources.worldbank.org/DISABILITY/Resources/280658-1172606907476/DisabilityDevelopmentWB.doc+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2005). ‘Why exactly is commitment important for rationality?’. Economics and Philosophy, 21(1): 5–14. [Reprinted in F. Peter and H. B. Schmid (eds.).]Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2006a). ‘Reason, freedom and well-being’. Utilitas, 18(1): 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2006b). ‘The human development index’. In Clark, D. A. (ed.) (2006b): 256–60.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2007). ‘Comment: Rational choice: discipline, brand name, and substance’. In Peter, F. and Schmid, H.B. (eds.): 339–61.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2009a). The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2009b). ‘Response’. Chapter 13 in Gotoh, R. and Dumouchel, P. (eds.).Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2017). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Expanded edition. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stewart, F. (2006). ‘Basic Needs Approach’. In Clark, D. A. (ed.) (2006b): 14–18.Google Scholar
++Sugden, R. (1993). ‘Welfare, resources and capabilities: A review of Inequality Reexamined by Amartya Sen’. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(4): 1947–62.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (2006). ‘What we desire, what we have reason to desire, whatever we might desire: Mill and Sen on the value of opportunity’. Utilitas, 18(1): 33–51.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (2008). ‘Capabilities, happiness and opportunity’. Chapter 12 in Bruni, L., Comim, F. and Pugno, M. (eds.) Capabilities and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 299–322.Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, Happiness and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vizard, P. and Burchardt, T. (2014). ‘Using the capability approach to evaluate health and care for individuals and groups in England’. In Ibrahim, S. and Tiwari, M. (eds.) The Capability Approach from Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Warnock, G. J. (1967). Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1987). ‘The standard of living: interests and capabilities’. In Sen, A. K. (1987, ed. Hawthorn, G.).Google Scholar
Wood, J. C. and Wood, R. D. (eds.) (2007). Amartya Sen: Critical Assessments of Contemporary Economists. Volumes I and II. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×