The Latin psalter

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521860062.026

24 - The Latin psalter

from Part II - Format and Transmission

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2012

Richard Marsden and

E. Ann Matter

Theresa Gross-Diaz

Show author details

Richard Marsden: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
E. Ann Matter: Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The psalter contains the complete book of Psalms, comprising 150 poems originally composed in Hebrew between the tenth and third centuries bce. For monastics, secular scholars and the laity alike, this was arguably the single most important book of the Bible. Among Christians of medieval Europe, it was generally agreed that the psalms were immediately and obviously about Christ: Aquinas summed up a millennium of exegetical opinion when he held that the psalms comprised ‘all theology’ and ‘everything concerning the Incarnation’. The psalter was at the core of both monastic and secular liturgy. For monks, it was the foundation of prayer and the sovereign guide to contemplation; for church writers, it was the cardinal text for trying out new approaches and teaching new ideas; for preachers, it was an inexhaustible handbook for constructing sermons. Clergy and laity knew the psalter better than any other book; and they knew it as a book – that is, not only orally, through sermons and liturgy, but in written form, for they owned it, commissioned it, even learned to read from it. The language of the Latin psalter was the language of the Middle Ages, its phrases so well known that they echo throughout sacred and profane literature of the time, and enrich the vocabulary not only of medieval Latin but of Romance languages. Its verbal images form a significant part of the artistic heritage of medieval Europe.

Text and versions

Though the history of the text of the Latin Bible is covered elsewhere in this volume, two points can usefully be emphasised here. The first is that the book of Psalms presents an exception to the gradual but ultimately overwhelming acceptance across Europe of Jerome's translation of the canonical Old Testament according to the Hebrew text. Instead of his final ‘Hebrew’ version of Psalms, his earlier ‘Gallican’ translation prevailed. The second point is that the text of this Gallican psalter was itself not entirely stable in the Middle Ages, largely due to its very importance in the liturgy and lives of western Christians. Both of these points need some explanation.

Type: Chapter
Information: The New Cambridge History of the Bible , pp. 427 - 445

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521860062.026 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aquinas, Thomas, In psalmos Davidis expositio, in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis opera omnia, vol. xiv (Parma: Typis Petri Fiaccadori, 1863; photographic repr. New York: Musurgia, 1949), p. 148.Google Scholar

De doctrina Christiana, ed. J. Martin, CCSL 32 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1962), pp. 1–167, at p. 42.

‘Psalterium Romae dudum’, in Biblia sacra iuxta vulgatam versionem, ed. R. Weber et al., 2 vols., 4th edn (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1994), vol. i, p. 767.

Leroquais, V., Les psautiers manuscrits latins des bibliothèques publiques de France (Macon: Protat Frères, 1940–1), p. xxxGoogle Scholar

de Bruyne, D., ‘Le problème du psautier romain’, RB 42 (1930), 101–26Google Scholar

Estin, C., Les psautiers de Jérôme. À la lumière des traductions juives antérieures, Collectanea Biblica Latina 15 (Rome: San Girolamo, 1984), p. 27.Google Scholar

Brou, L., ‘Le psautier liturgique wisigothique et les éditions critiques des psautiers latins’, Hispania Sacra 8 (1955), 337–60.Google Scholar

Contreni, J. J., ‘Carolingian Biblical Studies’, in U.-R. Blumenthal (ed.), Carolingian Essays. Andrew W. Mellon Lectures in Early Christian Studies (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1983), pp. 71–98Google Scholar

Contreni, , Carolingian Learning, Masters and Manuscripts (Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Variorum, 1992), item v.Google Scholar

Bullough, D. A., ‘Roman Books and Carolingian Renovatio’, in his Carolingian Renewal: Sources and Heritage (New York and Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991), pp. 1–38, esp. pp. 2–8.Google Scholar

Fischer, B., Lateinische Bibelhandschriften im frühen Mittelalter, VLB 11 (Freiburg: Herder, 1985), p. 344–5.Google Scholar

McKitterick, R., Charlemagne. The Formation of a European Identity (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2008), pp. 335–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

McNamara, M., The Psalms in the Early Irish Church (SheffieldAcademic Press, 2000), pp. 98–103.Google Scholar

Gretsch, M., The Intellectual Foundations of the English Benedictine Reform, CSASE 25 (CambridgeUniversity Press, 1999), pp. 21–3.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibson, M., T. A. Heslop and R. W. Pfaff (eds.), The Eadwine Psalter. Text, Image and Monastic Culture in Twelfth-Century Canterbury (London and University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

King Alfred's Old English Prose Translation of the First Fifty Psalms, ed. O’Neill, P. P. (Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America, 2001), pp. 31–4Google Scholar

Lobrichon, G., ‘Riforma ecclesiastica e testo della Bibbia’, in M. Maniaci and G. Orofino (eds.), Le Bibbie atlantiche. Il libro delle Scritture tra monumentalità e rappresentazione (Milan: Centro Tibaldi, 2000), pp. 15–26.Google Scholar

Dahan, G., ‘La critique textuelle dans les correctoires de la Bible du XIIIe siècle’, in A. de Libera, A. Elamrani-Jamal and A. Galonnier (eds.), Langages et philosophie. Hommage à Jean Jolivet, Études de Philosophie Médiévale 74 (Paris: Vrin, 1997), pp. 365–92.Google Scholar

Light, L., ‘Versions et révisions du texte biblique’, in P. Riché and G. Lobrichon (eds.), Le moyen âge et la Bible, Bible de tous les temps 4 (Paris: Beauchesne, 1984), pp. 55–93Google Scholar

Lobrichon, G., ‘La Bible des maîtres du XIIe siècle’, in Bernard de Clairvaux. Histoire, mentalités, spiritualité. Colloque de Lyon-Cîteaux-Dijon, SC 380 (Paris: Cerf, 1992), pp. 209–36Google Scholar

Lang, K. P. A., Die Bibel Stephan Hardings. Ein Beitrag zur Textgeschichte der neuetestamentlichen Vulgata (Bonn: Neuendorff, 1939).Google Scholar

Wilmart, A., ‘Nicolas Manjacoria, Cistercien à Trois-Fontaines’, RB 33 (1921), 136–43Google Scholar

Weber, R., ‘Deux préfaces au Psautier dues à Nicolas Maniacoria’, RB 63 (1953), 3–17.Google Scholar

Light, L., ‘Roger Bacon and the Origin of the Paris Bible’, RB 111 (2001), 483–507.Google Scholar

Dahan, G., Lire la Bible au moyen âge (Geneva: Droz, 2009), pp. 176–7Google Scholar

Black, J., ‘The Divine Office and Private Devotion in the Latin West’, in T. Heffernan and E. A. Matter (eds.), The Liturgy of the Medieval Church (Kalamazo, MI: MIP, 2001), pp. 45–72.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, M., Consorting with the Saints. Prayer for the Dead in Early Medieval France (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994), p. 73Google Scholar

Foley, E. B., The First Ordinary of the Royal Abbey of St-Denis (Fribourg: Fribourg University Press, 1990), p. 66.Google Scholar

Palazzo, E., Histoire des livres liturgiques. Le moyen âge. Des origines au XIIIe siècle (Paris: Beauchesne, 1993)Google Scholar

Harper, J., The Forms and Orders of Western Liturgy from the Tenth to the Eighteenth Century. A Historical Introduction and Guide for Students and Musicians (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991)Google Scholar

Taft, R., The Liturgy of the Hours in East and West. The Origins of the Divine Office and its Meaning for Today (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1986).Google Scholar

de Hamel, C., The Book. A History of the Bible (London and New York: Phaidon, 2001), p. 142.Google Scholar

Kershaw, P. J. E., ‘Eberhard of Friuli, a Carolingian Lay Intellectual’, in P. Wormald and J. Nelson (eds.), Lay Intellectuals in the Carolingian World (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007), pp. 77–105.Google Scholar

Dove, M., The First English Bible. The Text and Context of the Wycliffite Versions (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007), pp. 6–11Google Scholar

Angenendt, A., Braucks, T., Busch, R. and Luttenbach, H., ‘Counting Piety in the Early and High Middle Ages’, in B. Jussen (ed.), Ordering Medieval Society (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001), pp. 15–54.Google Scholar

Shaffern, R., The Penitents’ Treasury. Indulgences in Latin Christendom, 1175–1375 (University of Scranton Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Lobrichon, G., ‘L’evangélisme des laïcs dans le midi (XIIe–XIIIe siècles)’, in D. Dalarun (ed.), Évangile et évangélisme (XIIe–XIIIe siècles) (Toulouse: Privat, 1999), pp. 291–310.Google Scholar

Riché, P., ‘Le Psautier, livre de lecture élémentaire d’après les vies des saints mérovingiens’, in Études mérovingiens. Actes des journées de Poitiers 1er–3 mai, 1952 (Paris: Picard, 1953), pp. 253–6Google Scholar

Grundmann, H., ‘Die Frauen und die Literatur im Mittelalter’, Archiv für Kunstgeschichte 26.2 (1935), 129–61.Google Scholar

Map, Walter, De nugis curialium. Courtiers’ Trifles, ed. and trans. M. R. James, rev. C. N. L. Brooke and R. A. B. Mynors (Oxford: Clarendon, 1983)Google Scholar

Smith, L., The Glossa ordinaria. The Making of a Medieval Bible Commentary (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009) p. 78, and in this volume, Smith, ch. 20.Google Scholar

Minnis, A. and Scott, A. B. with Wallace, D. (eds.), Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism c. 1100–c. 1375. The Commentary Tradition, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), pp. 69–71Google Scholar