Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of Russian Literature
- The New Cambridge History of Russian Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- On Transliteration, Names, and Dates
- Introduction
- History 1 Movements
- History 2 Mechanisms
- History 3 Forms
- History 4 Heroes
- 4.1 The Saint
- 4.2 The Ruler
- 4.3 The Lowly Civil Servant
- 4.4 The Peasant
- 4.5 The Intelligent
- 4.6 The Russian Woman
- 4.7 The New Person
- 4.8 The Non-Russian
- 4.9 The Madman
- 4.10 The Émigré
- Index
- References
4.3 - The Lowly Civil Servant
from History 4 - Heroes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 December 2024
- The New Cambridge History of Russian Literature
- The New Cambridge History of Russian Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- On Transliteration, Names, and Dates
- Introduction
- History 1 Movements
- History 2 Mechanisms
- History 3 Forms
- History 4 Heroes
- 4.1 The Saint
- 4.2 The Ruler
- 4.3 The Lowly Civil Servant
- 4.4 The Peasant
- 4.5 The Intelligent
- 4.6 The Russian Woman
- 4.7 The New Person
- 4.8 The Non-Russian
- 4.9 The Madman
- 4.10 The Émigré
- Index
- References
Summary
The bureaucratic hierarchy established by Peter I’s Table of Ranks in 1722 irrevocably shaped the Petersburg text, above all through the poor insignificant copy clerks immortalised in nineteenth-century Russian literature. Aleksandr Pushkin, Nikolai Gogol and Fedor Dostoevskii all produced characters who became permanent literary icons as hapless cogs in the bureaucratic machine. The critic Vissarion Belinskii touted Gogol’s ‘realism’, promoting his use of ‘social types’ – characters recognisable from real life – to effect social change. Yet Gogol’s clerks were hardly realistic, let alone typical. Clearly the most salient prototypes for literary clerks are the literary clerks preceding them; these precursors (rather than any real-life models) became the ground on which new iterations of the hero emerged. The figure of the lowly civil servant persisted through the nineteenth century and into the twentieth and twenty-first, its copying itself becoming a medium for both cultural memory and artistic innovation.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Cambridge History of Russian Literature , pp. 719 - 736Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024